Inside Nvidia's Testing Facilities
An anonymous reader writes "FiringSquad has up a behind the scenes look at NVIDIA's Santa Clara HQ. In addition to the usual shots of the server farm, they spend several pages talking about the Silicon Failure Analysis Lab which is the secret to NVIDIA's success as a fabless semiconductor company. They also have shots of NVIDIA's thermal analysis lab where they run the GPUs at 40 deg C and 0 deg C, and the Performance analysis labs."
"Nothing for you to see here. Please move along." What?
An excellent Article! Finally a change from the mundane 'IT Cable Puller Assembles Software System to blah blah blah' Great to know that people are interested in what real engineers are doing. If course I do like the props given to the NVIDIA IT folks that keep everything humming nicely.
you can take a .22 revolver, put it to your head, pull the trigger, and not go at all..
or is this new comment system completely useless ?
All this renewed interest in corporations has us wanting our dot com parties back. They didn't mention the on-site oil changes. Interesting that the most valuable part of these companies is the lowest paying part: the QA lab. And the QA lab is still powered by 100Mbit ethernet.
Then of course many of U thought runaway housing inflation would force these companies to think about moving elsewhere like, say, Pleasanton. Wrongo. Even with 4x more expensive rents than 2000, Silicon valley is still the king of corporate headquarters.
NVIDIA Tech: Johnson, you've been playing that game for hours, how's it going? NVIDIA Tech 2: We just finished level three and need to tighten up the graphics a little bit. NVIDIA Tech: Great! http://youtube.com/watch?v=j9COTOUH4qU&mode=related&search=
"Time is nothing; timing is everything."
Read that as Santa Clause HQ? Man, maybe I'm catching the Christmas spirit or something. They're already selling the crap in stores.
why use Intel Clovertowns when they have there own real good chipsets for AMD servers / work station systems?
They missed the janitor's closet with the monkey typing on a keyboard where the linux drivers are programed!
I'm puzzled as to what is so "extreme" about 40C? My cat's temperature runs just slightly less than that and it purrs along quite nicely (literally).
I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
40 deg C? So what is that, 104 degrees farenheit? Thats not very taxing at all. Doesnt my laptop pull in 80 deg C?
The article greatly oversimplified the compute HW setup. Nvidia has a many-thousand-node computational grid with servers across a wide variety of size tiers for different job types (mostly chip design/validation). Stuff is tested pretty extensively prior to mass purchase, and what's running a given size tier depends a lot on combinations of demand scheduling and HW vendor model rollout scheduling, both in CPUs and the boxes they sit in.
It is "their"and not "there".
I noticed their later drivers are seriously having problems in Windows. Linux seems fine to me, but Windows drivers' quality are getting worse and worse. I remember 8x.xx versions were pretty stable and had very few issues with them. NVIDIA needs to get its act together on their drivers. Good hardware, but bad software (Windows) these days.
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
His memory misfired, I hate anal retentive people. Just get a grip and read between the lines. Some peoples memories are not as good and there is no edit function on slashdot.
I noticed a part of the article that states that their compute cluster can simulate their hardware in real-time. I wonder if it's a cycle-accurate simulation, and how they write the simulator! It's not that easy to write a fast simulator, even if you can throw massive hardware at the problem.
I have trouble seeing a future for Nvidia and AMD in the GPU business. I'm not sure there's going to be any market left for the GPU within five years. Intel and IBM are serious about their ray tracing ambitions. Larrabee and the proposed 2009/2010 Cell processor are going to be very capable ray tracing parts. IBM's interactive ray tracer is pretty impressive on today's Cell processor, even only using 6 SPUs on the PS3. I'm sure Nvidia will continue to exist as a company as they've already diversified into other components, but I think the future of graphics accelerator parts belongs to Intel and IBM.
Fabless? Or Fabulous?
ATI is releasing specs, and Nvidia isn't, so why should I care about Nvidia? I'm building a new computer soon, and it will definitely have an ATI graphics card (unless Nvidia also promises soon to release specs).
Uh... houses are cheaper in Pleasanton than those near Silicon Valley?
spilled coffee on the keyboard! Will that hurt much?
http://www.firingsquad.com/media/article_image.asp/2253/20
I thought Nvidia used a large cluster of Sunfire servers for their chip simulations.
Anyway, remember kids: NVIDIA is proprietary and undocumented hardware. Buy ATI/AMD instead!
Glass
why use Intel Clovertowns when they have there own real good chipsets for AMD servers / work station systems?
1) Quad core
2) Fast quad core
3) They didn't build their cluster just last month
Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
"At the Enrichment Center, we believe that a highly-motivated test subject and carry out rather complex tasks while enduring the most intense pain, so in case you don't make it through the testing...goodbye!"
"Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
There was an article buried in all those ads? My ADD addled brain couldn't get past the second page.
It's not a troll to say an article isn't news worthy.
That this article polled a measly 61 comments which says it should have never been posted.
Where does Slashdot get its mods+editors from these days?
Some peoples memories
"people's".
All that QA and they still can't get my 6800+ to run under vista w/o immediately blue screening.
I may have overstated things a bit when I said that verifying heat transfer was the primary purpose of testing at elevated temperatures. It's an important thing to verify though. Depending on the level of analysis performed beforehand, you'll have greater or lesser confidence that the product won't overheat, but nothing beats actually sticking a thermometer in/on the device and checking.
Of course in addition to that, you've got all sorts of other issues to look for - differential expansion causing components to separate, solder cracking, adhesives flowing when they shouldn't, verifying that the battery safety circuits work correctly, etc, etc.