Slashdot Mirror


Google Phone Rumors Solidifying

MrCrassic alerts us to an Ars Technica roundup of various reports about Google's rumored gPhone, from CrunchGear, Engadget, and others. Business Week attempts to read into the silence of software developers (who are all, presumably, under NDA) to triangulate Google's plans. Both outlets agree that Google is probably developing its own Linux-based OS for the gPhone, and that it will be open to outside developers.

14 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. 411 by mfh · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hello 411? How come I get more than a million listings for that number? And how come the first 10 listings all go to telemarketers?"

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  2. Competition for the iPhone? by Klaidas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess the gPhone will probably use 3G, be available worldwide and open for developers... Quite a competition for the iPhone, if you ask me. Maybe apple will then listen more to what customers want on their iPhones?

    1. Re:Competition for the iPhone? by mangu · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How about this phone? It has everything a developer could want, right? Or how about this one? Or all of these?


      I think being open for development isn't enough, you also need to spend a couple $100 million or so in marketing...

    2. Re:Competition for the iPhone? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think being open for development isn't enough, you also need to spend a couple $100 million or so in marketing...
      If only... if only google had a bunch of money lying around, or access to some sort of communications medium that could present advertising to a wide audience?
    3. Re:Competition for the iPhone? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, because the unwashed masses LOVE linux. And know what it is.

      The fun number of "people who want to run 3rd party apps on their iPhones" is 2%. Two percent. Most people don't care. They couldn't run 3rd party apps on their old phones and they can't do it yet with their iPhone.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    4. Re:Competition for the iPhone? by Echnin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      About that number though - from the way it's phrased it seems to refer to 2% of iPhone owners; maybe people who wanted to run 3rd party apps didn't buy iPhones? I really, really wanted to buy an iPhone for the form factor, multi-touch, and other goodies, but I really, really need to run a certain app, which, the developers say, *would* have been ported to the iPhone if Apple would have allowed it. In the end, I bought a Windows Mobile phone (HTC Blue Angel) and I hate it in every possible way (the crashing, the slowness, rough UI) except for the fact that it allows me to use this program, which saves my life every single day.

      Apparently, Apple didn't make the iPhone for people like me, but damn I wish they did. Oh, and it would be nice if I could get it some other way than buying it cracked from a shady dealer in Zhongguancun for 6000 yuan. Buying a phone that won't let me substitute the SIM card for a local one when travelling is not an option anyway... In the end, it's Apple's decision what product they want to release, and since they apparently make heaps of money this way through their profit-sharing deal with AT&T, more power to them. Still, though, I wish someone would make a phone for me.

      --
      Lalala
  3. Manna for the AI by Sub+Zero+992 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Text, video and image data were only the start. Making voip traffic available for analysis will significantly increase the range and amount of data available for nurturing a nascent AI.

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security - Ben Franklin
  4. Count me in! by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The iPhone occupies a mobile market that is far separate from what Google will be targeting with its series of lower-end, consumer-level devices.

    If they include a built-in flashlight, count me in!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  5. Post references outdated/old articles by acaeti · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is with this story referencing two very old (August for Ars, September for BizWeek) articles? Perhaps this article would be a bit more relevant: Google 'ready to take on Apple iPhone next year' Sheesh.

  6. Come on guys, stop and think by Nomen+Publicus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What does Google do? Web apps. What single hardware component would Google want everybody to have?

    A simple, cheap, thin web client that works anywhere where you can get a wireless signal.

    Any voice app would just be a bolt-on goody to the basic device (thanks to skype?)

    Google is in the business of delivering data, they really don't want to share any profit with a middleman such as the phone company. Apple had to do a deal with the devil, but Google as enough money to deal direct with the lost souls.

    1. Re:Come on guys, stop and think by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A 700mhz-wireless 4.25"x5.5" tablet running some form of embedded Linux, starts up with a browser connected to a GoogleApps homepage? Let's see - email (gmail), mapping (maps.google.com + gps), phone (skype), word processing, home finance, contact manager (gmail), MP3 & Mpeg playback, online storage (gmail)...

      They could put one in every student's and businessman's hands and still have market left over...

  7. consumer-level? by m2943 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The iPhone occupies a mobile market that is far separate from what Google will be targeting with its series of lower-end, consumer-level devices

    This statement suggests that the iPhone is somehow not a consumer-level device. In fact, both the Google phone and the iPhone look like they are going to be "consumer-level devices". The iPhone is "high end" in terms of its price. In terms of features, if the Google phone provides Google's applications (mail, docs, YouTube, maps, reader, talk, maybe more) and MP3 player functionality, the Google phone would actually be "higher end" as far as I'm concerned. The iPhone becomes even more expensive and complicated if you consider that the Google phone can just operate over the air, while the iPhone uses desktop syncing.

    I think this could be a serious problem for Apple because the one thing Apple traditionally has going for them over other companies is that other companies make their products too complex. But Google keeps things simple and cheap. Furthermore, on-line services without desktops is clearly where the industry is going: Nokia is coming up with OTA tie-ins, and Microsoft and Yahoo are also busy exposing their web sites through phone software and phone integration.

    1. Re:consumer-level? by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It will be amusing on a certain level if Google, which has been termed a potential 'Microsoft killer,' instead kills Apple.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    2. Re:consumer-level? by m2943 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      and there is a little problem with keeping a data connection open all the time. It drains the battery fast.

      That's a problem with your Palm, your chat software, and/or your cellular provider. Persistent data connections are widely used on cell phones and don't drain batteries if implemented correctly.