Slashdot Mirror


Google Phone Rumors Solidifying

MrCrassic alerts us to an Ars Technica roundup of various reports about Google's rumored gPhone, from CrunchGear, Engadget, and others. Business Week attempts to read into the silence of software developers (who are all, presumably, under NDA) to triangulate Google's plans. Both outlets agree that Google is probably developing its own Linux-based OS for the gPhone, and that it will be open to outside developers.

8 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. 411 by mfh · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hello 411? How come I get more than a million listings for that number? And how come the first 10 listings all go to telemarketers?"

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  2. Competition for the iPhone? by Klaidas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess the gPhone will probably use 3G, be available worldwide and open for developers... Quite a competition for the iPhone, if you ask me. Maybe apple will then listen more to what customers want on their iPhones?

    1. Re:Competition for the iPhone? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think being open for development isn't enough, you also need to spend a couple $100 million or so in marketing...
      If only... if only google had a bunch of money lying around, or access to some sort of communications medium that could present advertising to a wide audience?
  3. Manna for the AI by Sub+Zero+992 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Text, video and image data were only the start. Making voip traffic available for analysis will significantly increase the range and amount of data available for nurturing a nascent AI.

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security - Ben Franklin
  4. Count me in! by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The iPhone occupies a mobile market that is far separate from what Google will be targeting with its series of lower-end, consumer-level devices.

    If they include a built-in flashlight, count me in!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  5. Come on guys, stop and think by Nomen+Publicus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What does Google do? Web apps. What single hardware component would Google want everybody to have?

    A simple, cheap, thin web client that works anywhere where you can get a wireless signal.

    Any voice app would just be a bolt-on goody to the basic device (thanks to skype?)

    Google is in the business of delivering data, they really don't want to share any profit with a middleman such as the phone company. Apple had to do a deal with the devil, but Google as enough money to deal direct with the lost souls.

  6. consumer-level? by m2943 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The iPhone occupies a mobile market that is far separate from what Google will be targeting with its series of lower-end, consumer-level devices

    This statement suggests that the iPhone is somehow not a consumer-level device. In fact, both the Google phone and the iPhone look like they are going to be "consumer-level devices". The iPhone is "high end" in terms of its price. In terms of features, if the Google phone provides Google's applications (mail, docs, YouTube, maps, reader, talk, maybe more) and MP3 player functionality, the Google phone would actually be "higher end" as far as I'm concerned. The iPhone becomes even more expensive and complicated if you consider that the Google phone can just operate over the air, while the iPhone uses desktop syncing.

    I think this could be a serious problem for Apple because the one thing Apple traditionally has going for them over other companies is that other companies make their products too complex. But Google keeps things simple and cheap. Furthermore, on-line services without desktops is clearly where the industry is going: Nokia is coming up with OTA tie-ins, and Microsoft and Yahoo are also busy exposing their web sites through phone software and phone integration.

    1. Re:consumer-level? by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It will be amusing on a certain level if Google, which has been termed a potential 'Microsoft killer,' instead kills Apple.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.