Slashdot Mirror


Getting Grubby & Demystifying Linux Booting

davidmwilliams writes "Linux users can boast long times between reboots, but even so, the startup screens will grace your display at some time. Here's just what your computer is doing during this process, what the messages mean, and how you can take control."

30 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. Redhat specific by Janosh · · Score: 3, Informative

    The aritcle is wery redhat specific.

    --
    When i Moderate something -1 Flamebait, why do i not get another modpoint?
    5--1 = 6
    1. Re:Redhat specific by freeweed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah. chkconfig, eh. :)

      It's also rather light on content. 3 pages to say "yeah, this runs, and a bunch of other stuff that I won't talk about happens".

      This might have been useful in 1999.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Redhat specific by Procasinator · · Score: 5, Funny

      Be wery, wery quiet.... I'm hunting grubby webhats!

  2. Bad article by vidarlo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nothing new, and the author has apparently not used any other distros than the Redhat based ones. Nor has he heard about lilo or syslinux. First page of article looks like the man page of grub, listing the format for the menu.lst file of grub. Since it mentions selinux and redhat, I bet most of that page is copied more or less in verbatim from Redhat's manual. And since such a short article is split over 3 pages, and last page is laden with icons for digg, slashdot etc. I believe this is just an attempt to get some readers... Just don't bother to RTFA!

    1. Re:Bad article by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just don't bother to RTFA!
      I don't think you have to worry: we won't RTFA anyways.

      But seriously, it's not that confusing: BIOS finds and starts grub, which finds and starts kernel, which finds and starts init, which finds and starts everything else listed in the correct sets of /etc/init.d scripts.
      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Bad article by weeboo0104 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not sure I agree about this being a bad article. Sure the things the author goes into are things that are second nature for experienced linux users, but people who have only been exposed to Red Hat or Fedora might not be familiar with all of the logs that are collected in /var/log and might not really know just how useful grep and dmesg can be. It might not warrant it's own webpage, but I hope the author considers posting it as a sticky to Linuxquestions.net

      --
      It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
    3. Re:Bad article by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, but that's very *very* distro-specific.

      Slackware-based distros, for example, use runlevel 4 for X instead of RL 5. They also have *all* init scripts in /etc/rc.d, and the scripts are started on basis of whether they're executable. Anything runlevel-specific, like login managers and X servers are then loaded from /etc/rc.d/rcX.S where X is the runlevel.

      that's to say nothing of distros that aren't even using SysV init, like the current version of Ubuntu and anything BSD-based.

      It was pretty obvious that the author hasn't done his research, and that it's a pretty poor attempt at explaining stuff. I was rather hoping for an article where the author would actually parse the output of dmesg and explain, line for line, what everything meant. That would actually be informative. Instead, he gave information that was specific to RedHat Linux, a lot of which doesn't apply to other distros. I wouldn't even be complaining so much, except that he didn't even bother to write it specific to the most popular Linux distro. RedHat was the most popular when I started with Linux, over a decade ago. These days, that crown belongs to Ubuntu. If you're going to write something distro-specific, at least write it for the most popular one.

      Obligatory disclaimer: The last version of RedHat that I used was RedHat 6.0. When 7.0 came out, I switched to Slackware. I now use Zenwalk (slack-based, formerly MiniSlack, http://www.zenwalk.org/), having switched at Zenwalk 2.4. I have tried other distros, including Ubuntu, and still prefer Slackware-based distributions, and I find that the Zenwalk community and package management tools are the best of that breed.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  3. No Upstart? by dzelenka · · Score: 3, Informative

    How can you have an article about init without even mentioning upstart? Ubuntu has been using it since 6.10.

    --
    Bah!
    1. Re:No Upstart? by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because nobody can find any documentation on upstart?

      I think you didn't do your homework.
      --
      I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
  4. Pathetic by Anrego · · Score: 4, Informative

    That article was just pathetic.

    The concept to write an article about the boot process actually sounds cool, seeing as how there is quite a bit text that whips by on start up which many (even long time) Linux users don`t understand.

    This article however, was a really lame attempt to do so. It was very general, without even so much as a sample of text from dmesg. And what was there was very distro-specific. It just provided a quick over view of the major parts of the boot process, and didn`t even do that very well.

    Anyway, as someone said before, don`t even bother reading TFA..

  5. Windows refugees by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article won't help, however... It is not nearly detailed enough for learning anything. For the recent immigrants from Windows, it is a great roadmap.
    1. Re:Windows refugees by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And there are apparently quite a few Windows immigrants. More how-to and helping them get their Linux-legs is a good thing. And they will need all levels of articles too.

    2. Re:Windows refugees by Cprossu · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who currently has a 55 day uptime on his main XP box, I shall add a few others to the list

      3. If explorer.exe doesn't crash and not unallocate it's memory (which I suppose could be taken care of by a third party shell, but most of them will end up pulling explorer up for something anyway , and a decent amount of them are unstable when run for a very long time, a way around most explorer crashes has been for me to check the little known box that will load another explorer process for every window that is needed so that when one crashes it 'possibly' won't take the rest of them out)

      4. If general memory leaks don't take a substantial amount of your physical ram. (All I can say is I've personally had the most trouble with .net framework or vb based programs thieving memory and not returning it). (yay for firefox actually giving up the gobs of ram it takes once you close it after a week)

      5. If you don't pick up any viruses on the way (and your virus protection 1. requires no reboots during updates and 2. is programmed decently well)

      although a few things will plague any OS's stability,
      for an example,

      If your UPS/battery doesn't run out of juice during a given outage. (however I suppose you could circumvent this with proper usb drivers and hibernation, but there could be a technicality as then it might not count as continuous uptime)

      or

      If a piece of critical hardware fails

      Any OS can be stable (well, I take that back, except ME) just as long as you monitor it like crazy and keep everything up..

      Although I will admit that I am spoiled by my smoothwall and it's 280 something day uptime (the silly UPS's battery died less than a year ago leaving it unpowered in an outage), although even that's nothing compared to the old fridge VAX we had at the place I worked, which had a non-rebooting uptime of 5 1/2 years, good old VMS.

    3. Re:Windows refugees by crhylove · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's what would help Windows immigrants:

      An easy way to record video and post to YouTube.
      An EASIER way to make mp3s out of a CD (out of the box).
      Distros defaulting to the obvious preferable applications: Thunderbird, VLC, etc.
      Some more decent games besides Urban Terror and Emulators.
      More and Better Hardware companies supporting Linux.
      Easy and Fast Videoconferencing via speex and h.264
      Not needing to configure Grub at all.
      Also (in Ubuntu), not having an infinite list of growing kernels to choose show up in Grub.
      More improvements to Gimp and Open Office so they can actually replace Photoshop and MS Office.
      Never, Ever getting Error 22 again on boot.

      I mean, there are REAL things that Windows refugees need, and I don't think a half-ass tutorial about grub is it.

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  6. It's Web 2.0 by SignupRequired · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ever since somebody decided "Web 2.0" existed, there's been a big slew of these awful new "IT stuff" sites that look like they've been designed using a checklist of Web 2.0 mainstays and buzzwords. User ratings? Check. Submit news? Check. Blogs? Check. Annoying multipage articles? Check. Attention whoring abuse of social bookmarking sites at the end of every article? Check. More banner ads than content on any given page? Check. User comments? Check. Half of it is actually a decade old and was pioneered by Slashdot, but thanks to the magic of buzzwords, everything old is new.

    And with all of this stuff in place, they invariably fail to even attempt the final hurdle: creating decent content. Instead of picking one of the two available routes (create good content vs Slashdot-style aggregation), they seem to like to go halfway, with awkward "stories" like this half-boiled Red Hat GRUB HOWTO masquerading as "Breaking News".

    Sure, maybe these are probably all honest people trying to kick-start their journalism careers. But if so, what the hell are they doing throwing this crap around? Even Katz was more interesting than this trash.

  7. An Article about init by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 2, Informative

    As sad in previous posts this Article is about init, which is about to be obsoleted by upstart (at least in ubuntu and debian, but i think others will follow). Upstart can work as a drop-in replacement for init, and has done so in Ubuntu 6.10. Here is an old but nice Article about Linux Booting, that includes init and upstart.

    --
    I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
    1. Re:An Article about init by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Informative

      I still am not sure that upstart will be in Debian anytime soon.

      It just seems to sit in experimental. The fact that sysvinit stays marked as required and tries to re-install itself and remove upstart doesn't help.

      Grub2, on the otherhand, has been offered for the past couple months during installation.

  8. Ubuntu's fast resume patch for grub by schwaang · · Score: 3, Interesting
    By way of making lemonade, here's a post by an Intel engineer to ubuntu-kernel-devel about a proposed grub patch that would make resuming from hibernation much faster:

    Below is the work theory of our "grub fast resume" patch
    The normal swsusp2 resume process is:
    "grub" -> "kernel" -> "initrd" -> "resume from the hibernate"
    Our "grub fast resume patch" can work as below:
    "grub" -> "resume from hibernate"

    Our "grub fast resume" patch can resume the saved hibernation image from
    grub directly that will save much time to load and run kernel and
    initrd. The patch does not change any kernel code.


    [I use hibernate on Fedora all the time, so I'd love to see a patch like this go in to Fedora's grub. Thing is, the patch is apparently based on swsusp2, and I'm not sure Fedora's kernel uses the swsusp2 version of hibernation.]

    In a reply to the post, a debian guy points out that grub is legacy at this point, and that they are looking to move to grub2.
    1. Re:Ubuntu's fast resume patch for grub by pintpusher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a pretty cool little bit. It only makes sense, if the entire system is imaged onto the harddrive, why not just pull up that whole image from the bootloader and run it from there. Obviously there's more to it than just that, but still its a concept that makes sense.

      I see potential problems though if you've got changing hardware. By loading the kernel, you can reprobe the hardware (haven't watched a resume in a while to see if it actually does, but at least the mechanism is there). If you just drag in the whole image and restart execution one potentially changed hardware, that's a problem. But then I don't know whether hibernate handles changing hardware very gracefully anyway. blah blah blah rambling.

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
  9. Re:What does Grub Offer that Lilo Doesn't by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure I could go into more detail by doing a little research, but in short:
    GRUB is intended to be more generic than LILO and thus runs on more OSes and platforms. The developers probably got disgusted with dealing with LILO, SILO, PALO, boot0, etc... on different machines.

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  10. Linux users can boast long times between reboots by Tim+Ward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sigh. More climate change deniers.

    Look kids, it's time to grow out of willy-waving contests about how long you can keep it up, and turn the ****ing thing off when you're not using it.

  11. Re:Linux users can boast long times between reboot by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would be a GREAT idea, if only you showed us your secret way of resuming from cold boot within 0.5 seconds when the machine recieves a tcp syn packet on port 80.

  12. Re:What does Grub Offer that Lilo Doesn't by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Part right, part wrong.

    LILO copies a kernel image to its boot area. It doesn't matter if you change the kernel on the hard drive, because LILO's installed image won't change until you invoke the "lilo" command. I've actually seen LILO successfully boot a kernel and initrd (which panicked) after I had formatted a drive and removed all of the partitions, because I hadn't bothered to wipe the MBR.

    With GRUB, however, it's live. If you make a change to your menu.lst file, that change will take effect immediately. And while admittedly, I don't use GRUB, I don't think there's actually a test utility that will tell you whether your menu.lst is properly configured without rebooting. Correct me if I'm wrong, as I frequently am. The recovery console is useful, but as I'm often tinkering with things, I prefer to have a bootloader that's static, and won't change until I explicitly tell it to. There's also the "lilo -v -t" command to test when I make a change to /etc/lilo.conf.

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  13. Climate Changes? Ask me if I Care by fast+turtle · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm not willy-waving bragging about uptimes even though I leave my system on 24/7. It's because I'm running 2x Folding at home Clients.

    As to climate change, hell yes we're suffering climate changes but are the man-made or because we've entered the 50 year increased solar activity period of the 100 year cycle? The other question is who pays for the demanded changes and will they do any damn good? The damn research has gone about finding a solution the wrong way.

    Instead of looking at how to cut energy demands by

    getting rid of all parasitic electronic loads

    and you'd be surprised how fast those parasitic loads add up. The simple example is a 5watt load that's on 24/7. That consumes 1kw every 8d:6h, meaning just under 3kw in a month. Check how much is being used by the tv/stereo/surround sound, digital clocks, cordless phones, cable box, printers and such and you'll get an idea why the average household now uses more then 7.5kw per month.

    Now go and check all of your electronics and see if they're actually off instead of in standby before you bring up global warming again.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  14. Re:What does Grub Offer that Lilo Doesn't by DaleGlass · · Score: 3, Informative

    LILO copies a kernel image to its boot area. It doesn't matter if you change the kernel on the hard drive, because LILO's installed image won't change until you invoke the "lilo" command. I've actually seen LILO successfully boot a kernel and initrd (which panicked) after I had formatted a drive and removed all of the partitions, because I hadn't bothered to wipe the MBR.


    No, it doesn't. You can read the LILO technical documentation if you don't believe me.

    The fundamental thing about LILO is that unlike Grub, it's incapable of actually reading the filesystem the kernel is on. The way it works is that the boot sector contains the location of the map file, and the map file contains the list of sectors that make the kernel. There's no "boot area" as such. It's trivial to verify that the map file isn't the kernel, as it's tiny (78KB on one of my boxes)

    The reason LILO booted for you is simply because a format didn't overwrite the data areas of the disk. Since LILO doesn't read the FS itself, it doesn't matter to it that all the metadata is gone. So long the boot sector is there, the map's data is there (even without metadata indicating the filename, etc), and the kernel's data is there, it'll boot.

    LILO however will completely mess up if you are unlucky. Overwriting the kernel without calling "lilo" afterwards might work if it just happens to write over the same sectors and uses the same number of them. Or maybe the new kernel is written somewhere else entirely, in which case you'll boot the old kernel and it'll break later when something reuses the space taken by the old version.

    The recovery console is useful, but as I'm often tinkering with things, I prefer to have a bootloader that's static, and won't change until I explicitly tell it to. There's also the "lilo -v -t" command to test when I make a change to /etc/lilo.conf.


    The problem with LILO is that you can screw it up without touching LILO itself. For example, delete the active kernel. It'll probably work anyway, right until something reuses the space previously taken by the kernel. Then boom, doesn't work anymore. With grub it doesn't matter if you make a bad config file, or delete a needed kernel. So long there's a kernel on disk, grub can boot it.
  15. Re:What does Grub Offer that Lilo Doesn't by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Informative

    GRUB, unlike LILO, is able to read filesystems and recognize kernel images too

    Lilo probably overcame this a while ago but there is also problem reading beyond 1024 cylinders

  16. Re:Linux users can boast long times between reboot by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some of us use the things for stuff like serving web pages. In that case a couple of hundred days between power cycles or reboots is a pretty short time.

  17. do it from scratch by doti · · Score: 2, Informative

    A good way to know about the boot process is to install Linux From Scratch.

    I always got annoyed about things that run on my computer that I don't know what it is, and if removing it would break anything. LFS clarified for me many dark-spots about the boot process. I even ran the installed system for almost a year, but it got harder to keep up-to-date with package versions, and I came back to using a normal distro.

    --
    factor 966971: 966971
  18. Re:Rob Malda says by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's technical enough to divide the Moorlocks from the complete Eloi that call the beige box on their desk a "hard drive".

  19. Re:What does Grub Offer that Lilo Doesn't by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

    LILO copies a kernel image to its boot area.

    No, it doesn't. When you run lilo to install a kernel, it finds out which set of physical disk blocks contain the kernel image and stores the address of those blocks in the boot area. At boot time, it loads from that address. Note that if your file system were in the habit of moving files around, it might break LILO.

    I've actually seen LILO successfully boot a kernel and initrd (which panicked) after I had formatted a drive and removed all of the partitions, because I hadn't bothered to wipe the MBR.

    It didn't matter that the partitions were removed because LILO doesn't know or care about partitions. It was able to load the kernel because the disk blocks containing the kernel hadn't been overwritten.

    I don't use GRUB, I don't think there's actually a test utility that will tell you whether your menu.lst is properly configured without rebooting.

    No, I don't think there is, but that's because it's not really necessary.

    GRUB lets you edit the configuration from the bootloader, so if you happen to have messed up your menu.lst, it's no problem. Try to boot, see that it can't load the kernel, pop back to GRUB, look at the configuration you're trying to boot, tweak the config, try to boot that. Repeat until the system boots. In a worst-case scenario, you can even use the GRUB command line to explore the system, find a bootable kernel and boot it even with *no* menu.lst. This is better than LILO, because it even accommodates situations where the system may have changed. Being able to test your LILO config does no good if the config has been invalidated because disks have been swapped around, or if you forgot to update LILO after installing a kernel and removing the old one.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.