Slashdot Mirror


Note To Criminals — Don't Call Tech Support

Billosaur writes "Darwin Awards, here he comes: Ars Technica has up a story about a would-be identity thief who did himself in by calling tech support about printer drivers. Timothy Short must have thought he'd hit the mother-lode when he stole a PC and a Digimarc printer from the Missouri Department of Revenue, perhaps with dreams of cranking out thousands of fake ids. Problem: he could not unlock the computer he stole and without the necessary drivers, he couldn't use the printer. Ever resourceful, Short called Digimarc tech support a couple of days later (twice), which brought him to the attention of a Secret Service agent, who recognized his voice from a recording of the calls. Short now faces a $250,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison."

69 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. oblig. by Shteven · · Score: 3, Funny

    haha

    1. Re:oblig. by mw13068 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Invalid markup!

      Ha ha!

    2. Re:oblig. by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

      there should be a word for someone who has only ever made one logged in comment at slashdot and completely failed it in the process.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is: Shteven

    4. Re:oblig. by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

      before this day is over, I will tell someone 'You just pulled a shteven'. Yeah- my entertainment threshold is just that low.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    5. Re:oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like how he also managed to spell "Nelson" wrong. That kind of losership requires true talent. :-)

    6. Re:oblig. by foobsr · · Score: 4, Funny

      losership

      Even Google thinks 'Did you mean: leadership'. Maybe failing miserably comes in handy these days.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    7. Re:oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ohh god, a new meme.

    8. Re:oblig. by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Parent has used "Neilson" tags. He should be modded overrated.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:oblig. by mstahl · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, comment fails to post YOU!

      Wait wait, mods, I've got more! I, for one, welcome our new one failed comment posting overlords!

    10. Re:oblig. by LocutusMIT · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even Google thinks 'Did you mean: leadership'. Maybe failing miserably comes in handy these days. Hey, now. "Losership" is a perfectly cromulent word.
  2. Did the printer castrate him? by evildarkdeathclicheo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, Darwin awards? Unfortunately, criminals are still allowed to procreate and spread their genes. So unless he's either dead or rendered an eunuch, we're still screwed. -W

    1. Re:Did the printer castrate him? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not all dumb people are criminals. Well, not unless being stupid is outlawed.

    2. Re:Did the printer castrate him? by s.bots · · Score: 2, Funny

      unless being stupid is outlawed. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, except for idiots."
      I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood, and laugh at the stupidity that was once rampant our nation.
      I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of idiocy, will be transformed into an oasis of intelligence.
      I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their minds.
      I have a dream today.
    3. Re:Did the printer castrate him? by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We can dream of that future.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    4. Re:Did the printer castrate him? by twistedcubic · · Score: 4, Funny

      He probably suffers from lead poisoning, that's all. No need to trample on the disabled.

    5. Re:Did the printer castrate him? by Eddi3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey look, an Albert Einstein quote. Also, it's "And I'm not so sure about the former."

  3. idiot. by andreyvul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    use driverguide or google, ya moron!

    --
    proud caffeine whore
  4. Fake ID's by jcicora · · Score: 3, Funny

    Geez, talk about a close call for people living in Misery...I mean Missouri

    1. Re:Fake ID's by JK_the_Slacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got a news flash for him: I'm from Missouri. Nobody outside the state knows it exists, and everybody in the state knows each other. Either way, nobody would have believed he was who he said he was anyway.

      Note: St. Louis doesn't count. They seceded years ago.

      --
      I'm waiting for a "-1 somepeoplejustshouldn'tgetmodprivileges" meta-moderation.
    2. Re:Fake ID's by cromar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, I didn't know you were on here, JK. How's your mom?

      -A fellow Missourian

  5. Why ?? by Saija · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why the Department of Revenue uses a laptop with sensitive information, making easier to stole than a desktop?
    Inquiring minds want to know...

    --
    Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    1. Re:Why ?? by Major+Blud · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same reason anyone uses a laptop; mobility. Revenue employees need to take data out of the office and into the field to conduct on-site audits and make collections. I work with a State revenue agency that was really worried about losing one of these laptops. They just got through implementing a third-party encryption scheme to protect the data on the hard drives from prying eyes.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    2. Re:Why ?? by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where do you see in the article that this was a laptop? The article always says "PC" so it appears to be a desktop or workstation. A better question how in the world did he steal this large set up. I seen one of these things for mid-scale ID production from my former workplace and it is not small so he must of had some help and a very large truck or SUV to steal it.

    3. Re:Why ?? by Saija · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right spanish is my native language and thanks for the tip.
      Muchas gracias viejo !

      --
      Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    4. Re:Why ?? by Stooshie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's easy to steal a desktop from a public building. It happened in a local hospital. Two guys dressed in work clothes walked in, found an empty office, took away the desktop and walked out with it. Thankfully they didn't have to worry about opening the door while carrying the equipment. The security guard did that for them!!!

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    5. Re:Why ?? by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Informative

      You say you have an inquiring mind - so I hope you wont take offense if I point out that your question would have been better phrased this way - "Why would the Department of Revenue use a laptop with sensitive information, making it easier to steal than a desktop?"


      Or "Why would the Department of Revenue use a laptop for sensitive information, making it easier to steal than a desktop?" since the type of computer equipment in the frame of usage is the subject, not the equipment itself with the modifier of sensitive information being on it.

      A far better sentence would have been "Why would the Department of Revenue keep sensitive information on a laptop, where it is easier to steal, than on a desktop?"
  6. Low IQ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Probably used too much leaded gasoline when he was younger.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Low IQ... by blackcoot · · Score: 3, Funny

      there isn't a jury around that wouldn't buy a temporary insanity plea in that case.

      not that i have a raging psychotic hatred for dell tech support.

  7. In the realms of funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...My current province of residence uses a standard Fargo ID printer to crank out Driver's Licenses. I happen to have a Fargo printer for my current workplace.

    It would take NOTHING in terms of effort to crank out fake ID's - hell, the province in question (at least at this point) doesn't even use any fort of hologram or anything to secure the ID.

    I mean, this guy is braindead for calling for tech support to use his stolen goods - but at least through his stupidity & security measures they caught him. If I was an ass, I could easily crank off what I wanted to without anyone being the wiser.

    (Posted as AC, not because I do anything wrong, but I'd rather not have anyone realize the stupidity of this province & take advantage of it just out of my location in profile)

    1. Re:In the realms of funny.... by giminy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mean, this guy is braindead for calling for tech support to use his stolen goods - but at least through his stupidity & security measures they caught him. If I was an ass, I could easily crank off what I wanted to without anyone being the wiser.

      Actually, almost every printer worth its salt (any color printer that could print money/fake ids/whatever) these days puts a watermark on every document they print. The Secret Service, when they found a fake ID printed with your (company's) printer, would just look up the watermark ID, call the manufacturer, and find out it was printed at your work. A simple check of the printer's logs/q&a session with your network administrator would probably reveal that it was you who did the printing...

      At least if the guy had stolen the printer and not been caught, the SS folks would have had to resort to 'human interactive' methods to track down the fake ID producer. Given this guy's IQ, even if he had gotten the printer working successfully he probably would have been caught (some college student with a fake ID would probably rat on whoever he bought it from in a bargain to get terrorist charges slapped on his record).

      Reid

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    2. Re:In the realms of funny.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:In the realms of funny.... by George+Beech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ummmm so they would be able to trace the printer back to the agency he stole it from??? I'm sure he is scared of that happening.

  8. Funny - But still in the gene pool by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is funny, really funny. But it's not Darwin funny which unless I'm mistaken are feats of stupidity which remove you from the gene pool. Stealing a ID printer and asking for drivers, to make fake IDs, while funny it isn't as funny as trying to steal the legs off an abandoned yet erect water tower.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  9. Please Hold by Trub68 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hello tech support, yes I'll hold" KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK "Hmmm must be the pizza"

  10. Another story from 1993.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Australian University of Newcastle Engineering Department once had a undergraduate lab of Sony NEWS BSD Unix workstations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_NEWS , possibly one of the first institutions in the country to roll out such a setup. As you may of guessed, the lab was soon broken into and several of the machines stolen.

    About a week later, Sony Australia Support got a call.. from someone asking how they could install MSDOS onto the machines. The Rep handling the NEWS said they could courier and C.O.D replacement diskettes to the caller... got their address, and then said "Actually, could you do me a favour, and please return those stolen computers to the University of Newcastle..."

  11. Yes, the Darwin Awards mention is accurate by VorpalEdge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe the intent is to say that he will end up as a Darwin Award winner in the future, even if he hasn't yet managed the feat.

  12. Note To Non-Criminals -- Don't Call Tech Support by Lust · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one should call Tech Support - it's too frustrating.

  13. won't help by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well that would be true if, as shown on TV and movies, criminals are fiendishly clever Snidely Whiplashes, twirling their thin mustaches slowly as they ponder deeply the implications of their next criminal caper.

    But they're not. Pretty much anyone with an IQ above 90 figures out before he's 12 that crime does not pay, in the long run, and he goes into other lines of business as an adult. That doesn't mean he has to give up being antisocial or deploying his uglier personality traits to advantage, of course. Would-be rapists and contract murderers can become divorce lawyers, bullshit artists and con-men can go into subprime lending or telemarketing, and so forth. You can be a very successful legitimate businessman instead of a crook with some fairly small adjustments in your choice of victim and methodology.

    So as a rule those we have left in the actual criminal class tend to be irredeemably stupid, the kind who pull stunts like this -- and who would not learn anything useful by reading the story, since they lack the ability to generalize the lesson.

    1. Re:won't help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pretty much anyone with an IQ above 90 figures out before he's 12 that crime does not pay, in the long run, and he goes into other lines of business as an adult.

      No, it's because they think it's wrong. Many forms of crime do pay well.

      Many IT people know a great deal about identity theft, how hard it is to catch, have access to lots of data, and know how to cover their tracks pretty well. It's also a nonviolent offense so you'll probably get off lightly if caught.

    2. Re:won't help by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many forms of crime do pay well.

      Not if you subtract the penalties. For example, running 10 kg of coke at a time across the Mexican border pays very well. At first. But you'd very quickly come to the attention of the relevant authorities (the existing Mexican drug gangs) and be flayed alive and fed to dogs as an example to others. Intelligent people realize making $10 million with a day's work doesn't compensate for the risk of being eaten by dogs before you celebrate your 25th birthday.

      You won't be able to think of a good counterexample, by the way, because society is so constructed that any activity which is highly profitable, can be engaged in by most anyone, and is insufficiently noxious to really piss people off is legal or at least quasi-legal (meaning perhaps only technically illegal). Why would it be otherwise? You think our ancestors were not able to dream up pretty much every conceivable scam and method of gathering power and influence (which is all money is)? The basic questions of what fundamental activities are and are not tolerable have been settled for centuries, if not millenia.

      All that happens is that technology changes, and briefly enables old scams to surface under new disguises. It takes a little while for people to figure out how to categorize the new activity, but they do, and then it gets filed either under legitimate (if sometimes unsavory) business or crime that gets seriously punished. No doubt the length of time this takes enables a few lucky (?) entrepreneurs to retire rich while the issue is still in flux, but they won't be leaving the business to their children. So it's a dead end, if you're at all intelligent.

      Many IT people know a great deal about identity theft...

      And so what stops them from becoming identity thieves...? Their Christian consciences? The good of the many outweighs the good of the one? Please. I realize this is /. and all, where we venerate the geek, but don't make me laugh coffee out my nose.

      The reason IT people don't become identity thieves is because they can make a better living as IT managers. Not just in terms of plain salary but in terms of the pleasure of good work-related company (it's hard to get invited to parties with pleasant looking, sweet-natured, single women if you're a sneak and a thief), and in not having to look over your shoulder all the time.

      Of course, I don't deny many of them might not have Walter Mitty daydreams of running up the Jolly Roger and turning piratical, slitting a couple of throats over in marketing and force sundry managers to walk the plank. Who doesn't?

  14. Couldn't Unlock.. ?? by madsheep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Problem: he could not unlock the computer he stole and without the necessary drivers, he couldn't use the printer. So um... how did he unlock the computer? I'm not quite following that part.
  15. Waaaiiit a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the Secret Service just happened to be listening to the tech support line, hoping to recognize a criminal voice? I believe this is what they call a "buried lead" - the story should be, Secret Service Listens to Tech Support Lines. I assume, perhaps naively, that the secret service was listening in on the hope that their thief would call, and that they therefore had a warrant, but this un-addressed bit of the story is disturbing to me. My first question was "how did the Secret Service agent hear the voice to begin with?" Maybe he was moonlighting as a phone support monkey.

    1. Re:Waaaiiit a minute... by UninvitedCompany · · Score: 3, Informative

      One might conclude that the Service listened to a recording of the conversation. Many if not most tech support and customer service calls are recorded.

    2. Re:Waaaiiit a minute... by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was a specialized stolen printer, a kind intended to print government IDs. I don't think it was like your deskjet.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
  16. DAMN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    And here I thought getting printer drivers from HP was tough.

    1. Re:DAMN! by kcbanner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Naw, just a lengthy process...the 700mb printer driver downloads are a bit of a drag.

      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  17. Gary Glitter by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reminds me a bit of former UK pop star Gary Glitter. His career ended in tatters after a PC World technician discovered child porn on his PC while repairing it. Easily the best example of why criminals shouldn't call tech support (especially when you keep incriminating evidence on your bloody computer...)

  18. Missouri by djdavetrouble · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't get it, can you Show Me?

    --
    music lover since 1969
  19. Just the tip of the (criminal element) iceberg? by uofitorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is funny and all. But I can't help but wonder how often this kind of thing goes on that we aren't aware of and is perpetrated by non-Darwin candidates. I mean, news is only "news" when it's interesting and unusual (given that it's usually reported by a for-profit institution).

    --
    "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
    "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
  20. Finally! by kcarlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    A positive result from calling vendor tech support! And resolution in record time!

    --
    Free Adam Smith! (Or best offer.)
  21. would've been caught anyhow by viscus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Had he been able to get the printer working with his computer, he probably would've promptly made a posting to his local Facebook network reading: "HAY GUYS I CAN HOOK YOU UP W/ FAKE ID LOL" and been busted anyway.

  22. Re:Ha. by xaxa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think he's outdone by the the Chinese gang who took £26billion of fake English notes (in the non-existant £500,000 denomination) to the Bank of England and asked for it in current currency. How stupid do you have to be to take fake, non-existant currency to the Bank of England to convert it to current money? That's the central bank in England, and issues all the currency.

  23. It Takes More Than Just Technology... by morari · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remember a few years back when a group of preps and jocks from the local private school were busted for selling fake IDs. These kids' mommies and daddies had their bank accounts stuffed well enough for them to afford to properly produce, en mass, said IDs. The fakes were so perfectly manufactured that the only way anyone ever caught on is that the drunken little snobs failed to spell "license" correctly!

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    1. Re:It Takes More Than Just Technology... by kd5ujz · · Score: 4, Informative

      One way to spot a fake Texas DL is to check the word "Directive" (In the sentence "Directive to physician has been filed at tel #") on the back of the license. The first "i" will not have a dot.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    2. Re:It Takes More Than Just Technology... by Afrosheen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually I just checked mine, and since the authentic license (like mine) is missing the dot on that i, the fake will *have* the dot on the i. I guess that's what you meant to say.

    3. Re:It Takes More Than Just Technology... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Could be similar to the way cartographers sometimes include deliberate errors in maps such as misspelt streets or a small imaginary cul-de-sac. Helps spot the most obvious knock-offs.

    4. Re:It Takes More Than Just Technology... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Phone book companies do this, as well. They include fake phone numbers in their books; if a competitor uses their (copyrighted) data they can easily find out just by taking the competitor's book and looking for the fake number.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:It Takes More Than Just Technology... by myth_of_sisyphus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Back in the day I came into possession of an ID that vaguely resembled me. It was worth more than gold to me.

      One night at a club the bouncer scrutinized the ID and then asked me what my sign is. I had no idea. I memorized everything else on the ID but didn't think to figure out the astrological sign. His kung-fu was good.

      I immediately countered with an exasperated "I'm an atheist, if I don't believe in god why would I believe in stars directing my fate?"

      He had no answer to that and let me in.

    6. Re:It Takes More Than Just Technology... by andyr · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tell them Faeces. It takes them a little while to register ..

      --
      Andy Rabagliati
    7. Re:It Takes More Than Just Technology... by Random832 · · Score: 2, Informative

      UK spelling:
      license = verb
      licence = noun

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    8. Re:It Takes More Than Just Technology... by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny

      One night at a club the bouncer scrutinized the ID and then asked me what my sign is.
      God, I hate that, it's such a cheesy chat-up line.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  24. While we're on the topic... by citking · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When I was working for a small Midwestern university as a network consultant we had a lab machine disappear. It would seem that, the last time the hardware was placed back in the lab, another consultant forgot to run the security cable through the PC's security plate.


    At this particular university the networking equipment we had (DEC repeaters) didn't have the subnetting capabilities to split nthe "business" side of the network from the "student" side of the network. Thus, until the network equipment was to be upgraded over the following summer, students were required to have an Intel, 3Com, or Xircom NICs to reduce the chance of some off-brand card storming the network. Of course, this rule was unpopular with students since these cards tended to cost a bit more than the PowerPipes cards available at Best Buy's bargain bin for $4.99. We kept track of the MAC addresses of students' cards to avoid the "Hey, let me borrow your MAC address" and also had a table that we updated with the first 3 pairs of octets in the MAC address. So, to say we enforced this policy with due diligence is an understatement.


    The machines we had for the people who conducted university business were also equipped with 3Com cards. We always inventoried these machines upon arrival and saved the MAC addresses in the database as well to keep people from borrowing one from the lab machines. Yes, the process was annoying and, as I said, it was eliminated once the network equipment was replaced.


    My boss, the helpdesk manager, tried in vain to search the repeaters for the missing lab machine's MAC address. Finally, one Friday about 2 weeks after the computer disappeared we decided to try again on a lark.


    Bingo! We found the machine coming off of a port in one of the residence halls. A quick call to the university police and we were on our way over to the room where the MAC address was currently being used.


    The guy who was in the room at the time denied having stolen anything and granted the officer permission to search. The officer gave me the go-ahead to open the student's machine and, lo and behold, there was the NIC with our MAC address on it (3Com does an excellent job of putting it top-center for easy reference). The student said that he purchased the card from a store and that it was his and that this whole thing was a huge misunderstanding...


    ...right up until the point where we broke out the UV light and found our university's security stamp on about 3 places on the card.


    After that the student was arrested on the spot. Last I heard he was expelled and was ordered to pay back the $1500 cost of the machine (he had taken a few choice parts and tossed the rest. It was a Gateway; I would have done the same).


    It just goes to show that even the smart ones get caught from time to time. If you're going to steal technology it's probably best to get the hell out of dodge after doing so and NOT call tech support or, in this case, plus a stolen NIC into the network.

    --
    "This food is problematic."
  25. hey hey HEY! by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is Slashdot, we don't have room for reasonable discourse!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. Re:harsh by taustin · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you RTFA, it makes it entirely clear. But I guess that's just too much trouble. It has, like, words and stuff in it.

  27. Re:harsh by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just out of curiousity:
    Did you buy your relatively low ID from someone on ebay?
    I mean... it doesn't take too much time on /. to learn that people don't RTFA.

    --
    Your ad could be here!
  28. A vicious circle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't print a drivers license without the drivers. Can't get drivers without a drivers license.

  29. Re:harsh by Technician · · Score: 2, Insightful

    10 years for stealing a printer? Seems a little harsh.


    Try swiping a "Printer" from Fort Knox.. It's the intended application and who it was stolen from is the problem. It was an ID printer. If you want years, grap a printing press and the plates for a few $20's from Fort Knox. It is not the same as stealing a newsprint press or an HP inkjet.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  30. Re:Ha. by nurd68 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, he might not be as dumb as you think.

    For a time, I worked at the subcontractor who manufactured the printers for Digimarc for their Missouri program. We customized the driver and firmware such that each printer had an "unlock code" individually keyed to each printer - basically a one way (computer->printer) public/private key encryption. The computer would get the public key, encrypt a "hello there" type message, and the printer would decrypt it with the private key. If you fail to encrypt it, nothing happens. If you encrypt it with the wrong key, nothing happens. So, it was implicitly tied to that workstation. If you can't get into that workstation, you can't print. If you try to print it on another machine, it doesn't work, even if you have the driver.

    Now, you can always get the private key from the workstation, but we counted on the solution provider to secure the workstation, which it looks like they did in this case.