Slashdot Mirror


Free IMAP On Gmail

A number of readers are writing in to tell us that Google is rolling out IMAP support for Gmail accounts. Several people say that some of their gmail accounts offer the IMAP option (in Settings, Forwarding and POP/IMAP) and others do not.

104 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. But... by JK_the_Slacker · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I thought that only Apple would release an iMap? Had me fooled.

    --
    I'm waiting for a "-1 somepeoplejustshouldn'tgetmodprivileges" meta-moderation.
    1. Re:But... by dwater · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nope, google beat them to it, even though they are gSlow. They really dropped the iBall on this one.

      --
      Max.
    2. Re:But... by JK_the_Slacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Holy crap! It's a map with Missouri on it! Somebody call the Weather Channel, they need to see this. CNN too.

      --
      I'm waiting for a "-1 somepeoplejustshouldn'tgetmodprivileges" meta-moderation.
    3. Re:But... by nuzak · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, Brooklyn ends in "fuckin' a". Actually most things from there end in fuckin' a.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  2. Well it's about fucking time by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are they out of "beta" now?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Well it's about fucking time by Laebshade · · Score: 2, Informative

      Still in beta, but this is great news. I use gmail exclusively, and came to the realization, as others had already pointed out, that doing so is foolish. Imap support will make it easier to make full backups. Just last week I did a complete backup with a linux box and pop3 access to the gmail (with getmail/tar/bzip2). Now I can just keep an imap client running on my home system to constantly keep copies of the mail (once I get the imap option in gmail, that is). Thanks Google!

    2. Re:Well it's about fucking time by dwater · · Score: 3, Funny

      Google are experts on the whole Web-2.0 thing - it's good to see them finally getting hang of the Email-1.0 thing too.

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:Well it's about fucking time by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Informative

      I dunno. POP3 and IMAP4 are both serious enhancements to the MUA experience.

      I'd peg UUCP as 1.0 -- straight copying of files and appending to a mailbox on the machine where the mail was read. Mail path directed by sender through well-known hosts.

      1.5 would add SMTP, and the ability to deliver over TCP/IP using berkeley name resolution (DNS) without the need for well-known hosts. Mail is still read on the machine it is delivered to.

      2.0 seriously enhances the user experience, by allowing the user to retrieve e-mail from a central repository (mail server) to be read by a (potentially offline) MUA via POP2. 2.1 would be POP3, 2.2 would be IMAP, 2.2.3 would be IMAP4.

      IMNSHO. :)

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  3. Got me excited there for a minute. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just went and checked; no IMAP option for me. Just the usual POP ones.

    It'd be nice to get IMAP, though. Right now I basically only do Gmail from one machine, because when I access it from another one, either via Gmail's web interface or via a standalone POP client, everything gets screwed up. There's no tracking of which messages I read through the web interface when I later get them via POP, and emails that I send through the web pop up in my Inbox in Mail later. It's okay if I'm going to be away for a while, say on vacation or something, but it's obnoxious enough that if I'm away for a day or so, I just let it go.

    IMAP would be a huge step up.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just checked my two account it appears that my oldest one has the imap link and the newer one doesn't yet

    2. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by AxemRed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same here... I just checked, and I only have an option available for POP. When I clicked on the "learn more" link, it explained POP and gave me a couple of other links. One of those links was titled "what about IMAP." When I clicked on that, it said that the document was not available. Ya, I would really like IMAP a lot more than pop.

    3. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by wnknisely · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Same here. The account I set up back when Gmail was only available to blogger users is now IMAP enabled. The Google App accounts are still POP only. Hopefully it will only be a couple of days till they're all IMAP capable.

      --
      In illa quae ultra sunt
    4. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by finiteSet · · Score: 4, Informative

      IMAP is an option for me and I only registered my Gmail account a month or so ago. I put off getting a Gmail account for quite some time only because it lacked IMAP support - I couldn't be happier with this development.

      --
      If we start buying CDs then the terrorists have already won.
    5. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by Spikeles · · Score: 3, Informative

      To get IMAP to show up you need to change your GMAIL Display language to "English(US)" in the "General" Tab.

      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    6. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by eealex · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about your case, but when I changed my language settings from Japanese the English(US) the IMAP option comes out!

    7. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      To get IMAP to show up you need to change your GMAIL Display language to "English(US)" in the "General" Tab.

      Nope. Already is, but no IMAP. :(

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by Cardcaptor_RLH85 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That probably just refreshed your pages to bring up the IMAP option. Switching from English(US) to English(UK), saving the changes, and changing back, did absolutely nothing for me ^_^

    9. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      FYI, I don't have an 'IMAP option'. But it still works...

      Just configure your client to use imap.gmail.com as the server, with SSL enabled.

    10. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by smurfsurf · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got the setting ones I logged out and logged in again. Try it, perhaps it works for you as well.

    11. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by r3m0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it "kinda seems" like they randomly distribute user profiles between (dozens/hundreds/thousands) of mail stores and mail access points, and the software of each system is being upgraded seperately.

    12. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just tried setting up my gmail account as IMAP in Thunderbird, but got an error that "IMAP is not enabled for this account".

    13. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by hondoslack · · Score: 4, Informative

      From google help: "Don't fret if you don't see "IMAP Access" yet under the Settings menu. We're rolling it out to everyone over the next few days." RTFM

      --
      "...Teach a man to fish; you have fed him for a lifetime" -he has to want to fish, otherwise he won't learn!
    14. Re:Got me excited there for a minute. by ejasons · · Score: 2, Informative

      That probably just refreshed your pages to bring up the IMAP option. Switching from English(US) to English(UK), saving the changes, and changing back, did absolutely nothing for me ^_^

      Interestingly, it did work for me. I didn't have the IMAP option, changed to English-UK, then back to English-US, and the IMAP option was there...
  4. Size of headers? by Psychor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not sure exactly how they're going to implement this, since I can't see the option in my account as yet. I would imagine they'd have to limit it somehow though, since for accounts with thousands and thousands of emails sitting around in them like mine, the size of even downloading the headers via IMAP would be fairly prohibitive?

    I would guess they'll limit support to a few hundred of the latest mails only or something like that, but if anyone has checked it out and has any information that'd be useful.

    1. Re:Size of headers? by HeavyD14 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I went in and downloaded every header from my All Mail folder, right from "Gmail is different, here is what you need to know" from 3 years ago to my latest email from 2 minutes ago. It took a minute or two, but they all came through.

    2. Re:Size of headers? by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever turned on a new feature on a few hundred thousand servers?
      Thought not.

      I assume that it will take up to a week for them to roll it out to everyone.

    3. Re:Size of headers? by Jay+L · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ever misdirected your snark at a reply instead of the original post?

      Thought so.

    4. Re:Size of headers? by empaler · · Score: 2, Informative

      YMMV, but GCALDaemon will set you up, The guides were all made before they made a GUI configurator (GCALDaemon/bin/config-editor.sh), which makes it so easy it ought to be a crime. HTH :)

    5. Re:Size of headers? by Jay+L · · Score: 2, Funny

      You will. And the company that will bring it to you is AT&T.

  5. A bit late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would have been nice when I started. Now my gmail inbox is a mess. Currently, my Thunderbird inbox is clean and my gmail account has 20,000 or so unread messages. Does anyone know if it's possible to get google to replace its stuff with mine?

    1. Re:A bit late... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This would have been nice when I started. Now my gmail inbox is a mess. Currently, my Thunderbird inbox is clean and my gmail account has 20,000 or so unread messages. Does anyone know if it's possible to get google to replace its stuff with mine? Why wouldn't you just sync up your Gmail account to a folder in Thunderbird (once you have the option, of course), delete everything currently in your account, and then copy the contents of your Thunderbird inbox to it?
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  6. Labels or Folders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I personally hate "Labels", but how will Gmail support something basic like folders?

    1. Re:Labels or Folders? by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Isn't that the same? And you could tag a single mail with multiple labels, which is essentially like making a shortcut on every folder/label? I use very basic labels but yes I agree, labels should have an option to have a folder like interface.

    2. Re:Labels or Folders? by dwater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't much like the labels either.

      I've been a satisfied Fastmail user for several years now. Apart from gmail being free (FM has free accounts too, but they're ad supported or something - I pay for their premium service), I don't see any advantage in their interface.

      I wonder if this new imap service will help people who already have stuff in folders (like me) move to gmail? I tried gmail a while ago and it was a pain to set it up to do the same as fastmail was doing automatically (ie use plus-addressing). Perhaps I'll give it another try, afterall, free is good.

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:Labels or Folders? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I personally hate "Labels", but how will Gmail support something basic like folders? Well, since you can do everything you can do with Folders, with Labels, I expect it really won't be that hard.

      All you need to do for a 'folder' is have a label that says "present in xyz folder." So to put a message in a folder you just tag it with that, and then the 'folder' itself is just a view that only shows messages with that tag. How the messages are actually stored on disk is irrelevant to the user. This means you can use database storage schemes that are much more efficient for large sites than flat files.

      The obvious advantage to a user of tags vs folders is that you can have a single message in more than one psuedo-folder in a tag-based system; in a true folder-based system, you either need to make a copy of the message in order to store it in two folders, or you need to do something nasty with symlinks/pointers.
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:Labels or Folders? by Bronster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We still have better support at FastMail though :)

      (yes, I do work for FastMail - was wondering if we'd get mentioned in this thread)

      Oh - and we're responsible for most of the bugfixing that's happened in the past few releases of Cyrus thanks to being early adopters and thanks to me spending far too much time reading C code for my sanity.

    5. Re:Labels or Folders? by daemonc · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wondered that myself, but don't have the option to try it out yet. Fortunately Google did a good job of explaining the Label to Folder mapping here: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=77657

      --
      All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
    6. Re:Labels or Folders? by dwater · · Score: 2, Informative

      > We still have better support at FastMail though :)

      Indeed, support is excellent. I particularly appreciate the RSS feed to the status weblog, and the fact that is has accurate and honest commentary on any current problems - not that there's much traffic on there, but it happens from time-to-time (nothing that's affected me though - well, not recently).

      Kudos on the Cyrus work too, btw. I had a go at implementing it at one point, but the project 'changed direction'[1]

      Max.

      [1] out-sourced to some provider called Luxsci (also pretty good, IMO) because running a server requires a fair amount of on-hand expertise that we couldn't rely on long-term. I really wanted to use FM - there were some options but you guys weren't geared up for the commercial setup we wanted.

      --
      Max.
    7. Re:Labels or Folders? by the_wesman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      hi - no offense to your viewpoint, but I find this unfathomable - at work, we use ms outlook/exchange and I despise organizing things into folders - the reason is that some things are applicable to multiple categories - for example, my company has multiple software products and each has a build and automated test cycle - so when product B is built, I get an e-mail about the build, and when it's smoke tested, I get another e-mail - I would like to label these as "product B" (for both e-mails) and "build results" and "test results" for the others, respectively - seems to me that you only gain functionality this way - using gmail's implementation as an example: you can then click on the label that says "product b" and see all the stuff (build and test results) for that product exactly the same way you would as if there were folders ... actually, I just thought of a difference: you don't get a folder hierarchy ... dunno, that doesn't seem like a huge loss to me - is that why you prefer folders? seriously - I'm baffled as to why anyone would prefer folders vs a label/tag system.... to each his own - cheers
      -w

      --
      calling all destroyers
    8. Re:Labels or Folders? by wdavies · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a huge loss? I have folders with dozens of entries. If I didnt have folder hierarchies I would be fucked in browse only mode. Therea subtle distinction: For example:
      I could have a Work folder from John, and a Friends folder with a John Sub-folder. Tags alone cant fix that, unless they are nestable. I'd end up having to create a Work_John label inside a Work tag...

      True, Each to their own organization style. But Googles tags SUCK ass for this philosophy.

      Also -- I have been completely unable to fix their TAG and THREAD conflation. Lets say I send a 100 emails for a wedding invite. I'd like a filter that would apply 'bounced_wedding_invite' tags. But if you do this, ALL replies in the thread get this tag. God knows who does their QA, or whether their PM's have any sense of usability.
      I've tried to get it fixed thru friends at Google, but as far as I know it still sucks. Which is why I'm sticking with Good Ole Eudora and POP gmail.

    9. Re:Labels or Folders? by Beavertank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except that it does kind of matter, at least to me. I'm connecting to my Gmail account using my palm and Agendus mail and it wants to pull 4000-some emails (400mb worth, I don't want 400mb worth of old emails on my palm thanks). I've tried labeling everything that comes in now as "New" and telling it to pull only things from the "New" folder but it doesn't quite work like that because its a label, not a folder.

      Doing it over POP was annoying, but still useful when I was away from useful computers for long periods but still needed to be in touch, IMAP should have solved all the POP issues I'm sure everyone has run into... except now, to do it, I either have to pull 4k emails or delete all of my old archives.

      So yeah, folders are (sometimes) important to end users. Thanks.

      If, by some rare chance, someone figures out how to make labels work exactly as folders do (at least in the eyes of portable mail clients) I might just kiss you... assuming you share the method with me.

  7. I have it. by vitaflo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Shows up on mine. Given I was a very early adopter of gmail, I wonder if they aren't doling it out to the old timers first.

    1. Re:I have it. by UltraMathMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sweet me too! Don't know if I'll use it or not though, I kind of like the interface - or perhaps it's that I'm just used to it :)

      --
      Registered Linux User #423733
    2. Re:I have it. by AWeenieMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have the option on an account that is about 18 months old and another one that is about a month old. So, it doesn't seem to be related to when accounts were created.

  8. my account was enabled by brjndr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I checked and had IMAP enabled, so I changed it on my iPhone too. My iPhone has folders for all my labels now too, and it you click on the folder it downloads the last 50 (or 25, based on your settings) of that label.

    Previosly sent mail is in 'sent mail' folder under a 'Gmail' parent folder. Mail sent from the iPhone is in actual 'sent' folder. At least it's not emailing me a copy of my sent mail anymore.

  9. Old fashioned way to get IMAP by AncientPC · · Score: 2, Informative

    *requires own domain

    1) Create an e-mail account on your domain dedicated for this one purpose.
    2) Forward your gmail account to above account.
    3) Access above account via IMAP.

    I hate POP3 as I routinely check my e-mail across multiple devices / computers daily. POP3 with server copy just doesn't cut it.

  10. Some have it, some don't, not totally obvious by Coopjust · · Score: 4, Informative

    OK, some interesting bits:

    -My Gmail account created late 2004 has it, as well as a friend from a month later.
    -My Gmail account created summer 2005 does NOT have it.
    -My "Google Apps for your domain" account, late 2006, has it, admins and regular users.
    -Unlike typical announcements, it's not showing in the upper right. You have to go into your preferences. If you see a "Forwarding & POP" tab, you lack it. If you see a "Forwarding & POP/IMAP" tab...obviously, you have it.
    -All your labels become Subfolders in a "[Gmail]" folder that sits next to your inbox. It also has the spam and All Mail folders (If you have a lot of email, it understandably take FOREVER to load the first time--- "Processing 1 of 7000 email headers")


    It's a great move that's likely to keep me on Gmail, but it seems to play a lot nicer with Outlook 2003 on Win XP Pro than Evolution on Ubuntu Gutsy.One email account is perfect, the other is horrible, and other than the username they have the same exact settings. The one that doesn't work has 600 email headers to download, and the other one downloaded 7,000 in a snap.

    1. Re:Some have it, some don't, not totally obvious by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My personal GMail account does have it.
      My personal domain G Apps account does not.
      1 of the 3 G Apps domain accounts that my company has does have it.

      The other reply said 'it's random, don't look for a pattern' but I've done major rollouts, and doing it randomly is a serious headache. I think it's much more likely they're doing it by server and if your account is on a server they've rolled out, you've got it. It'll look random, but won't really be.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  11. You might need to log out/log in by Eagle7 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I did not have IMAP in my account when I checked (as soon as it was posted on /.). I logged out of Gmail, and logged back in, and suddenly the option was there in settings. YMMV (but hopefully it will work).

    I'm curious how they are implementing labels equaling folders... I see folders in Apple Mail for all my labels, and I see labels messages in my Inbox and in the label folder. I haven't started trying use cases to figure out how deleting, moving, and copying messages in Mail relates to the labels in Gmail.

    --
    _sig_ is away
  12. Can you use it to upload mails? by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the deficiencies of gmail has been that it's very painful to put all your old emails into it. I'm thinking maybe imap will fix this. I happen to be one of the lucky ones who got imap, so I'll keep you posted.

    --
    Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
    1. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ok I just tested it. In fact you *can* use this to upload emails!!! hooray! Now I can use gmail as my primary/only email repository!!!!!

      --
      Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
    2. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by Carthag · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Care to give a bit more details on how you do this? I wouldn't want to accidentally delete all my mails and have to look through backups.

    3. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by abes · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's an option in the settings to pull email from up to 5 (?) sources on the GMail page. There are several settings that allow you to optionally move or copy the emails. I did the move option, so I could check if any mail didn't make it across.

      On the whole it worked great, EXCEPT that the date of the mail got messed up, it took the entire day, and the order was a bit strange. I ended up having to sort by date sent rather than date received. It was also a big pain in the ass to get random mail from my old account throughout the day.

      On the other hand, once it was finished, I had stored 5 years of emails from my school account. There's still a few emails that never made the transfer, and I'm not completely sure why yet.

    4. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by master811 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You'll need Outlook. Any version will do I think, other email clients might work though in my experience Outlook Express doesn't work and neither does the Windows Live Mail client. Thunderbird should work though, but of course if you have a hotmail account or you use exchange, your only option will be to use Outlook. Basically with Outlook simply copy/move your folders (right click or drag) that you need from an existing imap/pop/mapi account whatever and put them into the google imap account. It should be that simple, of course it'll mean uploading the email you copy, so if you have a lot of it or are on a slow connection it will take time.

    5. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by gnuman99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sure Google is very happy about it too. Targeted advertising people, targeted advertising.

      So maybe good for NSA and other 3 letter agencies - they don't even have to try to intercept email these days anymore. People store it conveniently for them on Google.

      gmail, hotmail, instant messanger, facebook, myspace, slashdot, etc. The distributed Internet has become very modular these days. People are worried about root DNS hosts. Imagine what people would do if you took down only a handful of these domains. 1/2 the people online would be lost.

    6. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by laejoh · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'll need Outlook.

      I'm on Debian, you insensitive clod!

      That's the non-free repository, no?

    7. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by stavros-59 · · Score: 5, Funny

      gmail, hotmail, instant messanger, facebook, myspace, slashdot, etc. The distributed Internet has become very modular these days. People are worried about root DNS hosts. Imagine what people would do if you took down only a handful of these domains. 1/2 the people online would be lost.

      So it wouldn't be all bad then

    8. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by stu42j · · Score: 2

      I'm sure Google is very happy about it too. Targeted advertising people, targeted advertising. Except that if you only ever use IMAP, you never see any ads. I suppose the hope is that most people will use both IMAP and the web interface and that allowing IMAP will increase usage overall.

    9. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by jbarr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your coment was funny, but for those who may not know, on the IMAP Settings screen in Gmail is a link to instructions on how to configure Thunderbird and several other email clients. Here's the direct link: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=77662

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    10. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thunderbird works just fine (and a lot better than Outlook) for IMAP. When you go into settings to enable IMAP, there's a little link below that will detail for you how to use IMAP with gmail from common email apps (including Thunderbird).

      The servers are:
      imap.gmail.com
      smtp.gmail.com

      The username fields are:
      yourusername@gmail.com

      Once you've added a gmail account to thunderbird, you can add your other IMAP/POP3 accounts (if you haven't already), and drag+drop email between them and gmail.

      Well, that's the theory anyhow. Right now the gmail IMAP server is a bit slow and won't actually let me in... probably being slashdotted :-)
      However, I've done the same between various POP3/IMAP accounts before (note that if you drag from IMAP to POP3 it won't appear on other machines with the same POP3 account, since mail in that format stores on the local machine).

    11. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suppose the hope is that most people will use both IMAP and the web interface and that allowing IMAP will increase usage overall.

      Well certainly. Gmail's interface still far exceeds any traditional mail client. Using Outlook at work is the worst experience in my day. The benefit of imap is that I will be able to use my iPhone properly until the SDK is released, when hopefully Google will be able to develop a 3rd party client for my phone.

      Does anyone know of any mail experience available that is superior to gmail?

    12. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Using Outlook at work is the worst experience in my day.

      You obviously don't have to use Lotus Notes.

    13. Re:Can you use it to upload mails? by zkam · · Score: 2, Informative

      IMAP Behavior Chart from gmail help:
      https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=77657

  13. being rolled out gradually to random subset users by asserted · · Score: 5, Informative

    no point in looking for rollout patterns, user participation is being gradually ramped up and it's done in subsets of users that are basically random.
    at some point roll out will reach 100% and everyone will have the option. a little more patience is all that is needed :)

  14. Re:IMAP WEEE!!! by cs · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You write:

    I always wondered why they chose POP over IMAP in the first place.
    I'm only guessing, but think about the server resource usage. Everything they offer at present (web, pop) involves a client connecting, sucking briefly, and letting go. IMAP connections tend to be much longer lived, and that's a serious allocation issue with millions of users.
    --
    Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 cs@cskk.id.au http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
  15. No. by asserted · · Score: 2, Informative

    this is really a random fraction, staged rollout. Just wait and you'll have it too in due time :)

  16. Re:IMAP over SSL? by Coopjust · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, the IMAP connection is secured via SSL.

  17. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is there that you can do with folders but not with labels? I never understood the resistance, personally. I've always considered labels more powerful and therefore better, but maybe I manage things differently than most people--I set up a bunch of filters and now every single message I get is appropriately labeled, then "archived" (so that it doesn't show up in my inbox).

    That way, the few things left unclassified await me in the inbox (and I can filter them if need be), but everything else is under an appropriate label (and because I mark *everything* as read once I'm done with it, it doesn't really matter that there's one message with two or more labels).

    1. Re:Why? by funfail · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Subfolders are *not* the same thing as creating another tag/label. There is a hierarchy and expand/collapse metaphor.

      That said, it is possible to combine both, like in Lotus Notes. It calls them folders, but they are actually nested tags.

  18. Anyone seen support for IMAP IDLE functionality ? by slincolne · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Has anyone seen if this supports the IMAP IDLE mode of operating ?

    This is where your clients stay connected, and the server notifies the mail client when there is mail waiting, rather than having the client repeatedly polling the server.

    If/when they get this working it will be fantastic for those of us with mobile devices who can't afford a high end data plan.

    PS - if you have a Gmail account, and you can't see the IMAP option in settings, log completely out of gmail, close the browser window, and then connect and check again - that's all it took for me to find this nice new feature ;-)

  19. Mailbox size jumped too by frdmfghtr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Recently my mailbox capacity was approaching 3 GB...it seems to have taken a big jump to 4.3 GB in the last week or two. ANybodty else notice a capacity jump?

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    1. Re:Mailbox size jumped too by maxume · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Mailbox size jumped too by Mini-Geek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slashdot posted this article several days ago.
      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/13/111211

      --
      do {print "Mini-Geek Rules!\n";}
      until ($TheEndOfTheWorld);
  20. Yes. by asserted · · Score: 3, Informative

    it does.

  21. New Accounts Come With It? by JStegmaier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to test a theory, I created another account on Gmail, and it had IMAP right from the get to.

  22. Have it too, even does SSL by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been wondering for a while if they'd roll out IMAP, but I was pleasantly surprised to see the supported SSL for IMAP. For them I'm certain the overhead is marginal, it's still a nice mail service.....if you don't mind the google indexing your mail.

  23. Re:IMAP WEEE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The POP3 RFC: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1939.txt is 23 pages. The IMAP RFC is 108 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3501.txt

    Why do you think?

  24. IMAP: switch to "English (US)" interface language by frik85 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You have to switch your language to "English (US)" to get the IMAP options in your GMail settings.

    Other interface languages will get the update and therefore the translation sync later, as usual.

    --
    My favourite operating system is ReactOS; binary compatible to WinNT series :P
  25. Re:The more suckers the better !! by garbletext · · Score: 3, Informative

    Right, but they can build a program to do it, then have the robot summarize the most salient points of your life, from a marketing perspective, to whoever. Manually reading everyone's email would be tedious. Google has developed advanced tools so they can profit off you without needing to.

  26. Re:imap with multiple accounts? by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use an MUA that doesn't suck? Even Outlook 2003 supports multiple IMAP accounts. Thunderbird has supported it since the Netscape Communicator 4 days. Actually I can't think of a client off the top of my head that supports IMAP and doesn't support multiple profiles.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  27. Re:IMAP: switch to "English (US)" interface langua by soilheart · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well. I have English (US) and no IMAP options. So it's probably not only that right now.

  28. Re:The more suckers the better !! by Khaed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except they only profit off me if I use their free service, or e-mail someone who does.

    Also, gmail or not, anyone who e-mails anything even remotely private is an idiot. Google reading e-mail is the least concerning part of any unencrypted e-mail. It always strikes me as really odd when people complain about what Google does to the equivalent of electronic postcards.

  29. Depends on interface language by tokul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    US English shows up as POP/IMAP and has IMAP options. Russian shows up as POP and does not have IMAP options.

  30. Leopard by sam.thorogood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This co-incides slightly with Mac OS X Leopard, in that, the instructional video talked about "how easy it was to automatically use GMail accounts in Mail. Well, I think support by Google may have been pivotal.

  31. In other GMail news.... by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Informative

    Offtopic, but Google's been making some other new changes to GMail over the past few weeks. The most noticeable of them is that the disk space counter has been sped up dramatically. I'm at 4.3GB right now, which is close to 1.5 times as much space as I had two weeks ago.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  32. Warning: Gmail IMAP support is ASCII only!!! by bertilow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just tried the new shiny IMAP support in Gmail. All my messages seemed to download quickly and easily, and all seemed well. But a closer look revealed the horrible truth: All non-ASCII characters in all messages (received or sent) have turned into question marks (two or more for each character). So beware!

    It seems that Google have fired all employees that know anything about character encoding issues. Google used to do such things very well, but that is falling apart in a very ugly way. Google Groups was the major example, but now Gmail IMAP has probably taken its place as the major Google character encoding debacle. If it weren't for the fact that the Google Groups character encoding bugs (major bugs!) have remained unsolved (with no reaction whatsoever from the programmers) for a very long time now, I would have supposed that these IMAP bugs will quickly be solved. But I'm not very optimistic, actually.

    1. Re:Warning: Gmail IMAP support is ASCII only!!! by Leto-II · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got a bunch of UTF-8 (with Chinese characters) and GB2312 (also Chinese) encoded emails that worked just fine. But then I've got some others with the same encoding that don't work, and have ? as you said. The only difference I can see is that the mails that work used base64 content-transfer-encoding and the ones that didn't work just use straight 8-bit content-transfer-encoding.

      All the mails I sent myself through Gmail look fine. Lots that I received look fine. But there's some I received that don't work.

      Whether this will be fixed or not I dunno... But it's not all broken as you said.

      --
      Do not anger the worm.
    2. Re:Warning: Gmail IMAP support is ASCII only!!! by bertilow · · Score: 2, Informative

      But it's not all broken as you said.

      True. After searching through my messages I managed to find a few that have not been totally destroyed. But it's still broken enough, I'd say, like "several thousand e-mails turned into garbage"-broken.

    3. Re:Warning: Gmail IMAP support is ASCII only!!! by Barraketh · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work for Google, so I know for a fact that we have not "fired all employees that know anything about character encoding issues". We have an internationalization team which works with most customer facing Google products. I personally have tried this with foreign emails written in KOI8-R, UTF-8, GB2312, and ISO-8859-1 charsets. Please go to here to contact the gmail team with this issue, or you can reply to me directly with more details (specifically which character set and content transfer encoding were used in the mangled emails), and I will forward your issue to the right people.

      Barraketh

    4. Re:Warning: Gmail IMAP support is ASCII only!!! by flynns · · Score: 3, Informative

      You have to click through a couple menus so that they send your problem to the right place. Here, try this link: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/request.py?contact_type=gtag_headers&ctx=gtag_headers&bug_topic=Incoming+Encoding+Garbled&submit=Click+here+to+report+your+issue.

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    5. Re:Warning: Gmail IMAP support is ASCII only!!! by Bronster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, fantastic to see a response. Even though you guys are opening up right into a major segment of our customer base (I work for FastMail.FM, and good IMAP access is one of our selling points, so much so that I spend a lot of my time enhancing and bugfixing Cyrus), I'm glad that IMAP is an option for Gmail users, because IMAP is an all round better protocol than POP3 for serious use (and people are less likely to lose email if the only copy isn't on a flaky laptop hard drive somewhere).

      That said, IMAP doesn't map well to gmail's style of doing things already, and it's also less of a fit to how people would _like_ to use email generally. Single mailbox IDLE, no "submit" command that both sends an email out and copies to your Sent mailbox, etc.

      Do you know if Google has any plans to develop a newer protocol, and if so if you'd be willing to share it so a larger base of implementations could develop around it? Unfortunately I have both a young family and a non-existant travel budget so I can't easily get to the conferences, but I'm really interested in improving mail access protocols to keep non-centralised email relevant in these days of Facebook and similar services sucking users into them.

  33. Re:The more suckers the better !! by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, they can build a program to process the mails you are sending through their service and target you with ads...
    If you have an issue with an automated process accessing your mail and taking actions based on the content of it, you'd better not use a spam filter either... Infact, you probably shouldnt use email at all unless you can find a mail server which isnt a program.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  34. Re:IMAP over SSL? by AVee · · Score: 5, Funny

    You've got to wonder, is that a security measure or anti-competitive behaviour. "It's our user, only we get to read his email."

  35. Re:IMAP WEEE!!! by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Informative

    To the contrary -- IMAP connections persist but take nothing but an entry in a kernel + daemon table. POP has to make the full TCP handshake, SSL handshake, POP login, check the mail and disconnect every freaking 10 minutes. Even if there's some sort of keepalives to involved, they're a single packet in both ways instead of a full connection with authentication and what not.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  36. Re:The more suckers the better !! by dakameleon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Equivalent to 1st class mail is encrypted email - email sent "in the clear" bounces around so many servers that might do something else with it (like filing away a copy in the interests of "ensuring delivery"), you should assume that it's more or less public. You're concerned about things hanging around just on the gmail server? Welcome to the digital age.

    --
    Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Re:The more suckers the better !! by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right. The Post office archives all postcards for later access, any time, any place, ... for ever and ever. But then it goes one further - it opens my, I had assumed because I knew no better, 1st class mail (or any kind for that matter), and DOES THE SAME TO IT.

    Standard cleartext email, the kind of stuff that all email clients send by default, is basically a plain text file. There is no encapsulation or encryption at all. There is nothing preventing anyone and everyone along the way from reading it - much like a post card.

    If you don't want anyone reading your email you can use any number of encryption tools to make it harder for unintended recipients to read it - but not impossible.

    And if you're worried about Google retaining a copy of every email... Well, so can every single mail server that touches that message. As it gets relayed from one server to the next there is absolutely no guarantee that your message is not retained. There may very well be servers out there retaining copies for all of eternity...backing them up to tape...printing them out...

    Quite simply, if you are concerned about security and/or privacy, email is the last way you want to communicate with anyone.
    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  39. Re:You don't need Outlook for either of those by InvisiBill · · Score: 2, Informative

    You'll need Outlook. Any version will do I think, other email clients might work though in my experience Outlook Express doesn't work and neither does the Windows Live Mail client. Thunderbird should work though, but of course if you have a hotmail account or you use exchange, your only option will be to use Outlook. Basically with Outlook simply copy/move your folders (right click or drag) that you need from an existing imap/pop/mapi account whatever and put them into the google imap account. It should be that simple, of course it'll mean uploading the email you copy, so if you have a lot of it or are on a slow connection it will take time.

    Thunderbird can access Hotmail and other webmail accounts with the Webmail extension. I'm using it to access my Hotmail and Yahoo accounts. Likewise, Exchange is usually configured to support POP and/or IMAP, meaning any decent mail client can pull emails from it. See http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Connecting_POP_And_IMAP_Clients_To_MS_Exchange_Server.html for details. That won't give you access to all the other features, but it will let you get to your mailbox.

  40. iPhone support? by Pep1n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will this allow push Gmail, yahoo style, on the iPhone?

  41. Re:IMAP WEEE!!! by Sancho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sure that no small part of it was designing a way to handle the protocol. Since Gmail does labels instead of folders and archives mail to remove it from the inbox, it definitely acts a bit differently from the way that we traditionally think of mail. Mapping those functions to IMAP functions was probably non-obvious.

  42. GMail Team on IMAP by nherc · · Score: 2, Informative

    The GMail Team has finally officially commented on the addition of IMAP to GMail on the public About GMail "What's New" page.

    Also, the Official Gmail Blog has more information on the Gmail IMAP implementation and how it works across devices.

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
  43. LDAP by famebait · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Very cool.

    Now just to sound like an annoying ingrate, here's my remaining list:
    * LDAP-access to the contacts
    * mobile sync for calendar
    * mobile sync for contacts, notes, etc.

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  44. Re:The more suckers the better !! by Traxxas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes please spam directly to my computer with a domain name assigned to it that will be a major pain in the ass to change.

  45. Oops, forgot the SSL by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just to add to that. I missed a few steps.
    Set the following option under "server settings"/"security settings"

    Use secure connection: SSL

    You'll also want to add the smtp server:
    Server Name: smtp.gmail.com
    Port: 587
    Username and Password: yourusername@gmail.com
    Use secure connection: TLS