Slashdot Mirror


BBC "Not In Bed With Bill Gates"

whoever57 writes "The BBC's head of technology denied rumors that a secret deal with Microsoft was behind the XP-only launch of the BBC's iPlayer. According to Ashley Highfield, the reason that the player only supports Windows XP is that only a small number of Linux visitors have come to the BBC's website. Why he would expect a large number of Linux-based visitors to the site when the media downloads are Windows XP only is not clear. He also thinks that 'Launching a software service to every platform simultaneously would have been launch suicide,' despite the example of many major sites that support Linux (even if this is through the closed-source flash player)."

26 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. Lame reason. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is 'a small number of linux users' a reason for going with this? What is wrong with using a format that is available everywhere (including portable players!) as a matter of course?

    1. Re:Lame reason. by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 5, Funny

      Never mind. The title creates an image that I'm not going to be able to get out of my head anytime soon.

    2. Re:Lame reason. by twicepending · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the Article "We have 17.1 million users of bbc.co.uk in the UK and, as far as our server logs can make out, 5 per cent of those [use Macs] and around 400 to 600 are Linux users"

      Now I imagine that relates to visitors to the rather useless BBC front page, using the same info as used to compile the blog post at http://www.currybet.net/articles/user_agents/2.php> which claims that only 0.41& of BBC visitors use Linux.

      I'm a regular visitor to various bits of the BBC web site and I regularly come across other Linux users and just about the one thing we have in common is that we very rarely visit the front page - like most experienced computer users we go straight to sub-site we want.

    3. Re:Lame reason. by philicorda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have this in reverse.
      Making the videos only work in Windows specific media players is more effort than using a common freely available codec.

      At an extreme, having a single page with links to the videos in mpeg format would have taken one person a day to set up.

      They may have their reasons, but technically the simplest solution is often... the simplest one.

    4. Re:Lame reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or...... you cater to your audience. I don't see the problem with any of this. I STILL haven't coded my website to be compliant with Konqueror or Safari. That's not to say they don't work in either, I just don't care because the ratio of Windows and IE+Firefox to Safari+Konqueror+every_other_OS_specific_browser_ever is something like 100:1.

      The demographic on /. might include every weird browser out there (I'm looking at you Opera.) Slashdot is not "the norm" by any means. I run MANY websites with very comprehensive statistics to verify my claims.

      BY THE WAY I'm aware that this is due to a proprietary and closed source player, hence the issue. It's not like you can't:
      A) Get your news elsewhere
      -or
      B) READ, instead of watch video.

    5. Re:Lame reason. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sounds like some people need to start running a site spidering program through TOR using non-windows user agents.

      Personally, I've browsed the BBC websites (I don't know that I've ever been to the front page) via Mac OS X, Mac OS 9, various Linux flavours, FreeBSD, PalmOS, and even Windows Mobile. I don't think I've been there once via a Windows-based browser (except maybe some of the news articles).

      It would be extremely interesting to see how his metrics are being compiled.

    6. Re:Lame reason. by Nasarius · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not so. The Flash media server can do streaming content without FLVs (see Fabchannel.com, for example). Streaming-only media in an obscure, proprietary format is about as secure as it gets.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    7. Re:Lame reason. by Heddahenrik · · Score: 3, Funny

      0.86% of the Elftown users, use Linux, so 0.41% seems plausible.

      But we can all go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/ and bump that number to 50% ;)

  2. BBC's charter by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The interesting bit here is the Beeb isn't really a commercial organization. They're a public entity which is strictly required to keep itself free of commercial and political influence.

    1. Re:BBC's charter by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The interesting bit here is the Beeb isn't really a commercial organization. They're a public entity which is strictly required [wikipedia.org] to keep itself free of commercial and political influence.

      They're also required to account for their spending and for keeping costs down. If they proposed a completely open player and it was a significant amount of money more than the Microsoft one then they would have to justify why they went with the costly option.

      Granted I've not worked in a non-profit organisation, but even so, I think that justifying a larger spend on something that affects less than 0.004% of visitors is going to be a very tough sell for anyone.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  3. A wise designer once told me... by JetScootr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "You don't decide how big to build the bridge by counting the number of people swimming the river."
    Cuz once the bridge is up, hundreds more who couldn't swim the distance will want to cross.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  4. Stats not about iPlayer by paintswithcolour · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Why he would expect a large number of Linux-based visitors to the site when the media downloads are Windows XP only is not clear."

    It should be clarified that he was talking about the root bbc.co.uk site NOT the iPlayer site, so it is clearer why the would expect Linux users to visit the site.

    1. Re:Stats not about iPlayer by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He is throwing numbers out doesn't know what the hell he is talking about. Linux visitors to the BBC site has to be a hell of a lot higher than that. 400 to 600 hundred linux users? I got more than that when I was was working for a local Virginia newspaper! We had over 100,000 visits per day, linux users were running steady at about 2%. The problem with linux users was you never knew which browser they were going to use, opera, firefox, konqueror even EI running under wine.

  5. Did even the submitter read the article? by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because if they had, it would have been perfectly clear that by "the BBC website" he meant bbc.co.uk, as that's actually part of the referenced quote. Given that the site is one of the most popular in the UK, and is used by people from all walks of life, I'd say that their OS usage stats stand fair chance of being representative of reality...

  6. Based on Kontiki so no Linux version by Bushcat · · Score: 3, Informative
    Why he would expect a large number of Linux-based visitors to the site when the media downloads are Windows XP only is not clear

    iPlayer is based on Kontiki (owned by Verisign). Windows only, unless you're prepared to jump through virtual hoops, AFAIK. Reading through the user agreement: it's targeting UK-based computer users. Hmmm. Shall we build a Windows, Mac or Linux player? No-brainer, really, when the P2P distribution layer is Windows only.

    1. Re:Based on Kontiki so no Linux version by kebes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shall we build a Windows, Mac or Linux player? No-brainer, really, when the P2P distribution layer is Windows only. Sure... but isn't that backwards?

      Generally you shouldn't pick your technology (programming language, toolkit, etc.) and then pick your audience based on what it supports. Instead, you should write out a list of requirements, and then pick the technology that satisfies all those needs. In this case, if one of the requirements was: "Must be available to all fee-paying persons with computer access (i.e.: must be platform agnostic)" then an OS-specific technology would never have been chosen in the first place.

      I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, and assume that this is a result of mis-management (e.g. not thinking very hard about requirements) rather than corruption (e.g. collusion with software companies), but in any case I question their planning process.

      (And to those who may respond that "must support DRM" was one of the requirements in the initial design, and could only be satisfied using Windows-only software, I would then say that placing content protection above equal treatment of fee-paying users was, again, a poor design decision for an organization like the BBC.)
  7. Why not design for open in the first place? by Nomen+Publicus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Beeb did it because it was the cheapest, easiest, but not best, option.

    That said, it was a really stupid move and managed to get everybody from the smallest Linux hacker to the UK government commenting in public about the policy.

    Creating an open "player" for all platforms would have taken more resources at first, but from that point on all future platforms would be supported by the people who use the platform.

    Sadly, the Beeb needs closed source to implement the no-save and timed delete features forced on them by others.

  8. Love the summary by toleraen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why he would expect a large number of Linux-based visitors to the site when the media downloads are Windows XP only is not clear. Hey Fudmitter, he's not talking about the media site, he's talking about news.bbc.co.uk. Still that seems a little low. We should have upped those numbers for him and linked his site directly in the summary...
  9. Re:1% of user base by xra · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sad to say I have to agree with her. With the exception of Slashdots' visitors the majority of the computer users run Windows. That is why the company I write software for only develops browser applications for windows. You do not have to write separate browser applications, just one application that wouldn't be restricted to MS technologies. This way you would ensure that regardless of their numbers linux (and other non-windows) users would have access. No extra cost here.
  10. oh god, not this again... by greebowarrior · · Score: 5, Informative

    When will people stop whining about iPlayer being XP only? There's no secret Microsoft alliance, and no great conspiracy.

    The main reason why iPlayer uses Windows DRM is because the companies who produce content for the BBC didn't want their shows streamed without some kind of rights management, because, god forbid, it should end up on bit torrent. The cause of this is most likely ignorance on their part, because, as we all know, DRM stops piracy, saves lives, cures cancar and ends world famine.

    The core code behind iPlayer is completely cross-browser, having worked on some of it, I know that it conforms to BBC New Media guidelines, which specifically state that all HTML, JavaScript, etc must be compatible with all major browsers (we even tested major elements of it in Firefox, and quite a few of the developers worked on Mac/Linux boxes)

    There has always been a plan for a Mac/Linux version of iPlayer, but the current DRM requirements being imposed on the iPlayer Core team make it somewhat difficult for them to actually get working on it

  11. Guys, what did you expect? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Guys, what did you expect? by EvilMole · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Huggers joined in May 2007. The first closed trial of iPlayer started in 2005, with Windows Media: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergrated_Media_Player, http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbimp/F2824809?thread=2535012

  12. Re:Of course it was by teh+kurisu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If MS and the BBC were in cahoots, don't you think there would be a Vista version? Microsoft doesn't want you buying XP any more.

  13. Re:Definitely a screwup somewhere by goddidit · · Score: 5, Funny

    An incovenient truth: There really is only about thousand linux users.
    However they are a very vocal minority and because it's somewhat cool to be a linux guy
    some people claim that they run linux when infact they don't.
    I personally run Windows Vista Home Basic but I pretend to be a linux expert on various internet forums.
    Linux's "popularity" is really just a scam to fool newbies into thinking that people actually run linux.
    Then the newbies try actually installing linux and fail miserably,
    you must really be a kernel hacker to install it.
    Frustrated newbies then ask questions on the various forums and on irc and everybody answers to them in complete gibberish. We all get a good laugh that way (expect the noobs, they try the bogus solutions and fail once again).

    --
    This .sig is exactly 120 characters long.
  14. Nation shall speak peace unto nation by rx-sp · · Score: 3, Informative

    This man is clearly a small-minded idiot who the BBC should be ashamed to have on their staff. Frankly, I don't care a jot about support for Linux or Mac. That's not where I'm coming at this from. I'm coming at this from the simple tenets of the BBC's constitution, that "Nation shall speak peace unto nation". This is on the plaque outside Broadcasting House, the BBC main HQ. It's why the BBC has offices in eastern countries you've never heard of. It's why the BBC broadcasts programs for minorities. It doesn't say "Nation shall speak peace unto nation provided they're running a compatible operating system". That's like it saying, "National shall speak peace unto nations provided they have white skin", or "Nation shall speak peace unto nation provided they support the British government's war on terror". There are no bars here, for any reason, trivial or otherwise. It really is disgraceful that this man is in a position of power in the BBC. It shows how far standards have slipped in the BBC. The iPlayer project will very probably be cancelled anyway because another fuckwitt is running the BBC and has massively overstretched the organisation, so that it's now cutting back by billions of pounds. Generation X has all growed-up and they're simply not up to the job.

  15. Interview on Groklaw by Snart+Barfunz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read this if you think iPlayer is a good idea - http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071021231933899

    Mark Taylor of the UK Open Source Consortium makes the point that the BBC has spent 100 million pounds on the iPlayer project. They're also going broke and will have to sell their flagship London headquarters building for - guess how much?

    So, this project has already beggared the BBC. Am I too paranoid in seeing this as the first step in yet another Microsoft 'embrace and extend' play? They've had ambitions to own broadcast TV for ages. If they can prove their DRM works for a major broadcaster over the net, next step will be to DRM the broadcast TV. After that, if your TV doesn't have Windows Inside, you'll be shit out of luck.

    --
    --- Yx3 = Delilah ---