Slashdot Mirror


Genetic Modification Produces Mighty Mouse

Identity Missing writes "An Ohio laboratory has produced genetically modified mice which 'can run five to six kilometres at a speed of 20 meters per minute on a treadmill, for up to six hours before stopping,' as well as a number of other remarkable feats. An enzyme called phosphoenolypyruvate carboxykinases (PEPCK-C) is apparently responsible, and we should hope that the scientists are correct in saying that athletes won't be modifying their genes any time soon to get it, because it apparently makes the mice more aggressive. If anyone feels a super villain coming on, at least we can rely on these Mighty Mice. A video demonstrates just how much these little guys beat the competition."

13 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. Well, you know the next step... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone will just have to build a better mousetrap!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Well, you know the next step... by salec · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or GM the cats same way, too!

  2. I for one by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Interesting

    hope that these rodents don't escape the lab.

    Ordinary mice are hard enough to control as pests...

    1. Re:I for one by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My suspicion is that they wouldn't do well in the wild. Aggression and strength in the natural world have to be balanced with food requirements, which is basically why not every living thing is super-strong, super-fast, and super-tough. Dire wolves are gone for a reason ... These mice "eat twice as much and weigh half as much," which sounds great to people living in the modern industrialized world, but is a pretty serious liability for a wild animal.

      Also, they may be amazingly tough for mice, but you know, they're still mice. No matter how big and strong they may be, there are still plenty of critters bigger and stronger than they. If their aggression translates into a lack of caution around predators, then they'd essentially be nothing but a nice lean snack for health-conscious cats. ;)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  3. Whatever you do... by lonesome_coder · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...don't make them angry. You wouldn't like them when they are angry...

    --
    If you'd just do what we tell you and quit yer gripin' everything would be chocolate sprinkles and rainbows! -AC
  4. obligatory response by ByOhTek · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, meme botches you!

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  5. Cool. by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

    Overclocked mice! Do they have an overheat problem?

  6. I have a mighty mouse.... by NPN_Transistor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a mighty mouse, yet it can't "run five to six kilometres at a speed of 20 meters per minute on a treadmill", feel aggression, or do "a number of other remarkable feats". All it does is sit in my hand and make clicking noises when I try to pet it. It runs a lot longer than "six hours", but it doesn't seem to do anything else. It doesn't seem to have any eyes or a tail either. I think it might be defective... maybe I should return it to Apple.

  7. Mighty? by robably · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the modified mouse runs on the treadmill for six hours, while the normal mouse has a nice sit down and watches it. Maybe this modification just makes mice stupid.

  8. Smarter mouse? by oo7tushar · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I see is the that the "slower" mouse realizes that they're going nowhere on the treadmill.

  9. RTFA much? by cduffy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ten times as many mitochondria in the muscles.

    1. Re:RTFA much? by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you mean midichloridians.

  10. Re:If they experimented on humans this much... by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it unethical? If you could save thousands of lives by curing a disease, but curing the disease required potentially deadly experiments on a few people, wouldn't it be unethical NOT to proceed with the research? You first.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...