Slashdot Mirror


Robot Becomes One of the Kids

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers have found that toddlers treat a small robot as a peer rather than a toy. A team from the University of California, San Diego, placed Sony's QRIO in a classroom of kids aged 18 months to 2 years and watched them interact. Over time the children grew to treat the robot as one of them — playing games with the robot, hugging it, and covering it up with a blanket when its batteries ran down."

47 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. They do the same with a dog.. by moogied · · Score: 5, Insightful
    or any pet for that matter.

    For example.. take this sentence:

    games with the robot, hugging it, and covering it up with a blanket and replace robot with dog.

    Would that be news worthy? No. Why? Because its in the nature of most children to play games and take cares of others(because that is what people do to them.) This does not mean they see it as a peer. They see it as a pet.

    --
    So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    1. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by mdobossy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and replace robot with dog. What I found most interesting, however, is the difference between how the children interacted with 1) a more "robotic" control robot, 2) the "more human" robot when it ceases to act "more human". Sure a kid will nurture/care for a pet, but it is very different than how they treat a stuffed animal/toy.
    2. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The key point is that such experiments allow us to prove to us adults that all the prejudice in the world is the fault of people older than toddlers. To end racial prejudice, toddlers of different human breeds need to be raised together. And so on.

    3. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by Itninja · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To an 18 month old child, I doubt there much difference between the way they treat a pet and the way they treat a peer. For that matter, between nearly any object and a peer. Children will anthropomorphize anything. I've seen kids try to share their PB & J sandwich with a VCR. Is the VCR a peer? I guess in some abstract, childish way, it is. The real test is when they start competing with a parent for the affections of the robot. I still think my Mom likes her Roomba more than me....

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    4. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by joshuac · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still think my Mom likes her Roomba more than me....

      Wrong appliance.
    5. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by blindd0t · · Score: 3, Funny

      These days, it's generally preferred that there's not even a carpet that needs cleaning.

    6. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by dajak · · Score: 2, Funny

      I imagine that I will teach my 10 months old son my prejudices later, just like I am teaching him right now not to torture the cat.

    7. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or he'll grow up and at some point develop some all on his own. I don't think we learn all our prejudices as children. I don't think we learn all our prejudices at all. I think we can come up with them all on our own.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    8. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by corifornia2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I saw we give the robot lasers and a buzz saw and see how the kid treat it then.

    9. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by Kingrames · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Our soldiers serving in Afghanistan and Iraq were the target of a similar study, and you'd be surprised to know that the results were similar. Many of our troops were visibly upset and shaking after the "death" of a bomb-detonating robot designed for the SOLE PURPOSE of walking over to a bomb and detonating it. It even reached the point where they asked for military command to stop using the robots for such "inhumane" missions.

      You make it sound like this is childish behavior, but I think that perhaps even you might exhibit some of it too given enough time with a similar robot.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    10. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by Device666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually very young kids don't treat animals so much different than toys. I have seen a kid trying to use a guineepig as a little toy car. It's also no wonder kids grab the tails of cats, they would do the same with their stuffed whinnie the pooh bear. At a young age they mixup animals a lot calling a horse sheep etc. So it's not that difficult to imagine mixing up pets and robots (toys).

    11. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by pokerdad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure a kid will nurture/care for a pet, but it is very different than how they treat a stuffed animal/toy.

      Being an only child (and a man) nearly all my experience with babies/toddlers has come from my son, so this is admitly anecdotal, but with regards to him you couldn't be more wrong.

      My son frequently feeds, kisses, talks to, and puts his toys to bed. This is in no way limited to human-like or animal-like toys, in fact, his toy cars receive more attention and affection than any others.

    12. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone with a bit more knowledge might be able to expand on this.

      There was a famous experiment where a researcher had his child interact with a Chimp to see if the Chimp would exhibit human behavior. He found out after a while his child actually started to act like the chimp.

      I wonder if the kids acted similar to the robot?

    13. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most people also get upset when something happens to their car (and I don't mean the simple "damn, now I'll have to take the bus" reaction). Its a known fact that people can get attached to mechanical objects. Thats not what this study was about.

      They developed two robots, one very mechanical, and one that giggled and appeared to interact with the children. The children treated the second robot much different from the first robot. The first they treated more or less as a toy, with all the rough treatment that entails. They may well have become upset had it been taken away (as kids do for most of their toys), but they interacted with it differently than they would another child. They second they treated much like they would treat another kid, from how they touched it to how they took care of it. And the most interesting thing was over the long term this interest lasted, while they got bored with the first robot.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    14. Re:They do the same with a dog.. by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dogs are a special case. Domestic dogs have been selectively bred over countless generations to interact with people.

      I remember reading in Science News about a study where the ability of dogs and chimps to pick up on subtle human behavioral cues. Chimps are far, far more intelligent generally than dogs are. Chimps live in social groups that are much more complex, and perhaps human like, than wild dogs. They're our closest living evolutionary relative, other than the bonobo. Despite this, dogs outperformed chimps at interpreting human behavioral cues.

      The cheat in this experiment is that the researchers controlled the robot so it interacted with the children. If completely autonomous robots could approach the level of sophistication of a dog when it comes to interacting with a human, that would be news indeed.

      In any case, kids are a special case. Anthropomorphizing a machine is an act of imagination. The imagination of children is tremendously more vivid than adult imagination. When they run around the house pretending to fly, they are as close to experiencing flight like a bird as they will ever be in their lives. Careful parents make sure any second story windows are securely closed.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  2. yeah.. by resfilter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    most young children also treat inanimate dolls or stuffed animals as peers

    why is this so groundbreaking?

    1. Re:yeah.. by bcharr2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most young children also treat inanimate dolls or stuffed animals as peers

      You raise a good point. The study also utilized another robot that simulated a inanimate doll or stuffed animal. The article states:

      The children also treated QRIO with more care and attention than a similar-looking but inanimate robot that the researchers called Robby, which acted as a control in the experiment. Once they had grown accustomed to QRIO, they hugged it much more than Robby, who also received far more rough treatment.
    2. Re:yeah.. by glittalogik · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...who also received far more rough treatment. Proof that defilement of corpses is a naturally evolved trait.
  3. Cue "Robot Overlord" jokes! by iknownuttin · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...but a new study shows that a giggling robot is sophisticated enough to get toddlers to treat it as a peer.

    "Robot Overlord" jokes are actually on topic!

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  4. A brain the size of a planet by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    and they put me in the middle of a room full of toddlers.

    Life? Don't talk to me about life.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  5. Wait what did that researcher say by techpawn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Over time the children grew to treat the robot as one of them -- playing games with the robot, hugging it, and covering it up with a blanket when its batteries ran down."
    Some researcher said sex with robots in the next 20 years right? Might as well start em early...
    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    1. Re:Wait what did that researcher say by aphexcoil2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you're saying Slashdotters will be able to lose their virginity in 20 years? Sweet!

  6. SF writers got it wrong about "androids..." by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...Androids will not need to mimic human appearance, skin resilience and temperature, etc. with high fidelity.

    Human beings are sufficiently capable of anthropomorphizing... or empathizing... to treat even obviously non-humanoid things as human. (As witness the bonding between humans and pets).

    Robots only need to be reasonably human-like in appearance and behavior, and humans will meet them more than halfway.

    And, of course, and unfortunately, human beings are also capable of treating actual human beings as not human.

    1. Re:SF writers got it wrong about "androids..." by hellergood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed! :)

  7. Too bad Sony cancelled the QRIO... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 3, Funny

    They looked like really slick pieces of technology. Though, if I ever got one, I'd be too tempted to program it to act like Gir...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  8. Not surpised. by Thornburg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As the father of a 2 year old and a 4 year old, I am not at all surprised that the children behaved this way. Kids in that age group have very few prejudices, and have a very down to earth perspective, so if something looks and acts vaguely like they do, they treat it with respect (in their own way).

    Note that the researchers correlate treating something with some respect to treating it like a human. Many people (both children and adults) treat pets or other non-human animals in this manner.

    Robiticists are apparently excited by this, but I'm going to guess (based on the fairly short linked story (yes, I RTFA), that sociologists and/or psychologists will great this with a resounding "DUH!".

    (Disclaimer: I am not a roboticist, sociologist, or psychologist).

    1. Re:Not surpised. by porcupine8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a not-yet-phd'ed proto-psychologist, here's how I'd put it: Kids this age are unclear on what has agency and what doesn't. They are also unclear on the division between themselves and other people - they think that everyone can see what they see, for instance, and knows what they are thinking or feeling to a certain extent and thinks/feels the same way. Add these two together, and they attribute agency to something that *acts* like other things with agency, plus assume that because it has agency, it thinks/feels/has the same needs as they do.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Not surpised. by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a very interesting reading, I think you have your thesis!

      This discussion of course brings up the case of Kismet the Robot, to which many fully mature adults display an emotional response. They may KNOW that the robot has no emotions itself, but a smiley face and big eyes that respond to even a small repertory of facial responses in the human is enough to create the impression of sympathy, and enough to elicit an unconscious smile back from the human.

      Getting people to attribute agency or emotions onto inanimate objects has a long history of course, just ask a Totem Pole ;). A lot of people are convinced their computer has a personality, after all.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  9. May I be the first to say... by the0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Awwwww.

    "...and covering it up with a blanket when its batteries ran down."
  10. Awww...... by EjayHire · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, maybe it's a girl thing, but kids putting a blanket over the robot when his batteries run down is about the sweetest thing I have ever heard.
    -e

    (and she notes that she called it "his", inferring gender to the asexual robot.)

    1. Re:Awww...... by mstahl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah it's not just you. I'm a guy and I seriously awww'd loud enough that the whole office took notice. It's seriously the most adorable thing I've read in a few days.

    2. Re:Awww...... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, maybe it's a girl thing, but kids putting a blanket over the robot when his batteries run down is about the sweetest thing I have ever heard.
       
      (and she notes that she called it "his", inferring gender to the asexual robot.)

      And he notes that the male pronoun is the default in the English language - and does not imply gender. (English lacks gender, unlike many other languages.)
  11. Curious by Cillian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm curious as to whether the kids actually thought the robot was another kid or how much they understood what it was (I can't really remember how intelligent I was at that age...). I'd have thought a better way to make the kids take a consistent interest in the robot would be to make it do something useful, like, say, actually help in the classroom rather than just dance or giggle.

    --
    -- All your booze are belong to us.
  12. Not only that... by Shauni · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People are probably more likely to "socialize" with a robot if they can put it in its own separate category easily. Interacting with a non-human intelligence yet human container is bound to be disturbing (it's one of the sources of the uncanny valley)

  13. Re:So? by Thornburg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mod parent "Didn't RFTA". (aka Overrated)

    The researches had a control robot that didn't interact but was otherwise the same, and the kids treated them very differently.

    Half your point is valid, but the flippant comment is inaccurate and demonstrates that you didn't take the 90 seconds necessary to read the very short article.

  14. Not even reasonably humanoid to love by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not even that. Just take a couple of yellow sponge balls, stick them together, add a couple of simple eyes, a button nose and make it dance.

    Then you have the robot that everyone wants. (But can't have)

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  15. Alphie by kisrael · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was an only child in a neighborhood without many kids.
    I really liked "Alphie", this game playing robot (circa 1979).
    Had him for years, then let some other kids play with him and he broke.

    Lesson learned: other kids suck.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  16. Teddy-bears and dolls by rumli · · Score: 2, Informative

    Children have been hugging and caring for teddy-bears and dolls since forever. Dolls that talk or move get more attention. What's new?

  17. Kids 'n Roombas by bradgoodman · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I just love "researchers"....

    I don't know this study has anything to do with "robots". Children this age engage in all kinds of "imitative" play. And what are they imitating? Their parents - young kids (like mine) will feed, nurse, change, put to bed, their dolls, stuffed animals, etc. The "robot" is just another vehicle (no pun intended) for this.

    That being said, my kids love the Roomba. Before they could even walk, they knew exactly how to turn it on - and would crawl all over the kitchen, chasing it around! My 2-year old son would lie down next to it and put his arm around it! (Until he accidentally turned it on, and he ran screaming away from it smack into a door on the other side of the kitchen!)

    I was shocked the other day when I mentioned some thing about turning on the Roomba, and my 14-month old crawled over to it, pressed the "on" button, then the "clean" button - then when it made its "beep-beep-beep" (meaning it's about to start) - she quickly dropped to her hands and crawled quickly away from it, perfectly perpendicular to what would be it's travel-path off it's docking station. I shouldn't have been surprised, her second and third words were "Robot" and "Roomba"!

    So, they're toys like any other to the kids - but obviously a lot more fun! :-)

  18. Might even be better if they're not too close... by Asmor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's this concept of an "uncanny valley" where basically, something that's too close to human just looks totally off-putting.

    The name is based on a graph of "likability" vs. how realistic something looks... You see that things get more likable as they get closer to being indistinguishable from real, and then all of a sudden when they get very close, but not perfect, it suddenly dips down. As an example, many people find dolls creepy because they look very human-like.

    As always, Wikipedia has more on the subject and probably does a better job explaining it than I do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_valley

  19. Re:Am I the only person... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would you feel better if the kids call their wooden doll as their "new friend"? This has been going on for as long as toys have existed.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  20. Peers by Karl0Erik · · Score: 3, Funny

    Over time the children grew to treat the robot as one of them -- playing games with the robot, hugging it, and covering it up with a blanket when its batteries ran down.

    As a kid, I don't recall covering my friends with blankets when their batteries ran down.

  21. Human-assisted... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Just one very big problem:

    A human operator could also make the robot turn its gaze towards a child or wave as they went away.


    So it isn't just a robot, artificially intelligent enough to fool toddlers. It's something of a human-controlled puppet, with them telling it to do more advanced things than it could figure out on its own.

    So, I guess, basically a PR stunt for Sony.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  22. Re:So? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People said things like "it's trying to get out of the corner" and such. It's not "trying" anything, it's just following a set of equations (that I wrote) which are slightly too simple.

    What's the difference?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  23. Eventually ... by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... robots will become so lifelike that the teachers will try to have sex with them.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  24. Re:I can just see it now... It will become a crime by fractoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh, but is it? And why? Knowing that some people innately prefer children, that humans find it almost impossible to completely control or suppress their sex drive, and that we can't just kill pedophiles out of hand when they are discovered - logically such a device would end up saving children from molestation? Let's assume a pedophile starts with a Roomba, and adds to it piece by piece until it resembles an animatronic underage Real Doll - at what point does it become illegal?

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  25. I can hear it now... by maciarc · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Teacher, I gave Robby my milk cause he didn't have any. Now he's making funny noises..."