Amazon Sneaks One-Click Past the Patent System
theodp writes "By changing the word 'a' to 'the' and adding the phrase 'purchasable through a shopping cart model,' lawyers for Amazon.com have apparently managed to reinstate two of CEO Jeff Bezos' 1-Click Patent claims that were rejected a month earlier. 'Patent Owner's Rep was informed that the proposed addition to the claims appear to place the claims in condition of patentability,' writes the USPTO in its Ex Parte Reexamination Interview Summary of the 11-15 conference call that was held with five representatives of the USPTO and patent reformer Amazon."
I better hurry patenting the wheel before it's too late... the one purchasable through a shopping cart model that is.
The real news is that this revision was just a means to an end, and apparently the patent office fell for it...
The world's only surviving livewriter.
Will the last sane person in government please switch it to runlevel 6? But run rm -rf /home/uspto first please.
A previous president apparently set a precedent...
Thank you very much!
Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
Let's see:
There. Fixed that for ya.
HAND.
There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT
1. Detailed identity of the copyrighted work that I believe has been infringed upon. This includes identification of the web page or specific posts, as opposed to entire sites. Posts must be referenced by either the dates in which they appear or the permalink of the post
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=368407&cid=21450629
2. Identity of the material that I claim is infringing upon the copyrighted work listed in item #1 above.
'shopping list model'
3. Location of the author copyright notice (for information).
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=368407&cid=21448235
4. Information to permit our company, the provider, to contact you.
http://slashdot.org/~cyphercell/journal/188515
5. Statements
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMCA#Example_of_DMCA_Takedown_ProvisionReproduce the next statements:
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials (didn't you see the © - that's real shit man) described above on the infringing web pages is not authorized by my registered copyright and by the law (gimme money, money, money, bwahhahah). I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner of an exclusive right that is infringed.
cyphercell (843398)
Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism