Slashdot Mirror


New Nerve Gas Antidotes

SoyChemist writes "Scientists from Korea and the Czech Republic have discovered new drugs that can counteract the chemical overload caused by nerve gas. All of the experimental medications belong to a family of chemicals called oximes. Those molecules reactivate the enzyme that is damaged by the chemical weapons. Last year, the FDA approved the first combined atropine and oxime auto-injector for use by emergency personnel. Israel has been providing them to their citizens since the first Gulf War."

110 comments

  1. Combined, yes. But not new. by lecithin · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Last year, the FDA approved the first combined atropine and oxime auto-injector for use by emergency personnel."

    I don't know the history, but in 1987(and certainly earlier) the US military had this for the 'troops'. It was in 2 injectors, not one.

    atropine and 2 pam chloride (a oxime)

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
  2. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Funny
    In Australia you can get atropine inhalers for extraordinary cases of asthma. Good for snake bite too.

    Although I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  3. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Novae+D'Arx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like you said - Pralidoxime and Atropine injectors are extremely old-school for the US military. Although I'm happy that there are new drugs for treating nerve gas poisoning, TFA makes it sound like the "new" drugs are still completely untested - only on petri dish models, if I read it correctly. So, while there is promise, there are no human or animal efficiency results yet, no toxicity tests - all kinds of things are needed to prove that these new molecules are appropriate to replace the old ones.

    That's the thing about new drugs - they look wonderful and promising for a while in the lab, then you stick them in a monkey and his testicles melt or his hair falls out. Oops - back to the drawing board.

    Anyway, I'm skeptical but hopeful. I've had biochem weapons training in the Army, and nerve gases are effing nasty. More power to providing more survivability...

  4. What's it good for? by mmarlett · · Score: 1

    So, will this work on participants in the OS Flame Wars? They seem to be acting like they were hit with nerve gas over at "Leopard As The New Vista right now. Maybe they just need some tranquilizers.

  5. better explanation by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pralidoxime has been used with Atropine for a long time it seems, Atropine lessening the effects of acetylcholine its self and Pralidoxime is sacrificed to reactivate acetylcholine esterase [which helps remove acetylcholine after it is done with its job]
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pralidoxime

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:better explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are an excellent quoter!! A+++++ would read again!!1!!11!!!

  6. Blah, blah, blah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah. I saw this in that "Rock" movie about a bazillion years ago where Sean Connery pretended he wasn't British and Nick Cage pretended he could act.

  7. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by ExtraT · · Score: 1

    As an Israeli citizen I can assure you that the threat of chemical attack on Israeli civilian population is very real. All enemies of Israel posess chemical weapons and have repeatedly stated their willingness to use them against civilians.

  8. Are you trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel is as much to blame as anybody for the problems in the Middle East. Read up on some damn history that doesn't confine itself to Nazi death camps and the 1976 Olympics, just for a change!

  9. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by wizardforce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The continued attacks upon Israel to this day are a clear signal that Israel just can't communicate effectively with its neighbors.
    or maybe it has something to do with the fact that a lot of people were displaced from land which later became Israel and rather than burying the hatchet, that hatred was passed from generation to generation. Israel has key cities which are important to all three major religions in the area especially Jerusalem. The city is divided into sections with each religion getting a piece. Old religious buildings originally built for one religion were re-purposed for another, a good example is/was the temple mount. Israel really didn't need to do much after its formation to seriously tick off countries in the region, its very existence was enough.
    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  10. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The FDA isn't going to approve it without sufficient testing. Although there's no way they exposed a human to nerve gas and then used these drugs to see if it worked, there's no way that kind of test will EVER happen. The best they can do is what they've already done and that was sufficient to get it approved.

    Also, these drugs don't need to be tested as thoroughly as other drugs that would be taken on a normal basis. For example, the Advil you buy at the store had better damn well be tested enough that you know what's going to happen when you take it, because you take it on a normal basis. But a drug to counteract a nerve toxin is only going to be taken if you've been exposed to the nerve toxin. At that point, it's either die from the nerve toxin or have at least some chance of survival by taking this new drug. If it kills you, you were going to die anyway, if it doesn't then you live.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  11. TRRROOOOLLLLLLL!!!! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    Troll in the dungeons!

    But yeah, like the Israeli said, we Jews have this paranoid fixation on staying alive. The Israelis also have this thing for living in the rightful homeland of the Jewish people. When combined, you get the government giving civilians anti-nerve-gas tablets.

  12. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    That's kind of an irrelevant argument, though. If these lands are so valuable as religious resources, then every single occupier of that land would have had to keep the surrounding countries at bay for the entire occupation. Since that is clearly not the case, given the long periods of relative peace prior WWI, I don't see how having "key cities" is in any way apropos to the conversation unless you are also arguing that Israel is in some way preventing foreign pilgrims from accessing these monuments.

    As for the land claims, as I've mentioned, there has been quite a bit of time to reach a settlement on the majority of those claims. Are you saying that Israel has no fault in this and that it is purely a matter of the claimants not "burying the hatchet"?

  13. Excuse to piss in public by YU5333021 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm being serious here... In the case that I ever end up in a public space where it becomes obvious that a nerve gas has been released, (and there is no clear way of getting out ie. subway system, sports venue...) I would take off one of my socks and piss on it.

    ???????

    This was commonly done in WWI during nerve gas attacks. With lack of gas masks, the best way to protect yourself was to breathe through a cloth soaked in ammonia. Piss being the easiest source of it.

    The modern gases may be way more advanced than what was used in early 20th century, so my approach may come across as dumb, but if they find my dead body sucking on a piss stained sock, I won't care much. I'll be dead.

    1. Re:Excuse to piss in public by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many nerve agents are absorbed through the skin, though getting a lungful won't do you any favors either. In the event of aerial disbursement, you'd have better chances with a poncho, rain coat, or even wearing a garbage bag. Unfortunately for you, in the event people are still able to move (and react), you would likely be knocked over and trampled in the resulting panic while trying to get your sock off.

    2. Re:Excuse to piss in public by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether to laugh or not. Interesting.

    3. Re:Excuse to piss in public by ArcherB · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm being serious here... In the case that I ever end up in a public space where it becomes obvious that a nerve gas has been released, (and there is no clear way of getting out ie. subway system, sports venue...) I would take off one of my socks and piss on it.

      If you really worried about it, you could just carry around a water filter. They make small ones for sports bottles, although, I don't know how easy they are to breathe through. Either way, they seem to have the same stuff in them as modern gas masks. It may work in a pinch and no one runs over your ass while you are standing there DIH, too panicked to piss on a sock.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:Excuse to piss in public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So everyone make sure your bladder is always half full...

      If you have to go to the washroom make sure to stop pissing half way!
      It can save your life!

    5. Re:Excuse to piss in public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here lies old YU, done in by the mob.
      The gas didn't get him, though it would have done a good job.
      Halfway down he slid has left sock,
      but his piss was already unleased in his jock.

    6. Re:Excuse to piss in public by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Informative

      ammonia was "effective" for preventing poisoning from previous gas attacks because a lot of these gases were acidic/electrophillic. Phosgene in particular would hydrolyze to CO2 and hydrochloric acid in your lungs thus causing you to drown in your own lung fluids. Ammonia is a base thus neutralizing a lot of the hydrochloric acid produced. Urine contains a number of nitrogeneous compounds one of which is Urea which hydrolyzes into Ammonia and CO2.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    7. Re:Excuse to piss in public by Khyber · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ammonia. One ppm you smell it. two ppm you're dead.

      I'll take my chances with the nerve gas.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Excuse to piss in public by Jbcarpen · · Score: 1

      somehow I doubt that anyone has ever died by breathing the vapors coming off of urine. (Though some may have wished that they could)

      --
      GENERATION 667: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
    9. Re:Excuse to piss in public by piojo · · Score: 1

      Ammonia. One ppm you smell it. two ppm you're dead.

      I'll take my chances with the nerve gas. I'm sure this isn't the whole story. Perhaps this assumes several hours of exposure? A friend of mine cleans his floors with ammonia, and it's overpowering. I'm reasonably sure that the quantity in the air is well over twice the minimum that would be necessary for me to smell it. But his family is alive and healthy. This can't be true, or my friend would be dead.
      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    10. Re:Excuse to piss in public by bagsc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Piss won't help with any nerve agent. That tactic was partly effective against chlorine gas, which is soluble in water, so any water soaked rag will partly protect you. I say 'partly,' because even if your lungs and mucous membranes in the mouth and nose were protected in low concentrations of the gas, your eyes and skin are not. If it's a high concentration, you can see and smell it coming, so you get a chance to run. Of course, if you're stuck in a high concentration of chlorine gas, you're pretty much boned.

      Oh, and the ammonia neutralizing chlorine is also not true.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poison_gas_in_World_War_I

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    11. Re:Excuse to piss in public by dintech · · Score: 1

      In the case that I ever end up in a public space where it becomes obvious that a nerve gas has been released, (and there is no clear way of getting out ie. subway system, sports venue...) I would take off one of my socks and piss on it.

      In between the time of realising and building my 'filter' I would probably already have used up my supply. Ooops...

    12. Re:Excuse to piss in public by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      I'm being serious here... In the case that I ever end up in a public space where it becomes obvious that a nerve gas has been released, (and there is no clear way of getting out ie. subway system, sports venue...) I would take off one of my socks and piss on it.



      Nice gesture, but completely futile.



      This was commonly done in WWI during nerve gas attacks.



      No nerve gasses were used in WWI. Mustard, phosgen, chlorine, etc. aren't nerve gasses.



      With lack of gas masks, the best way to protect yourself was to breathe through a cloth soaked in ammonia. Piss being the easiest source of it.



      Pretty much every real nerve gas is also absorbed through the skin. A gas mask won't protect you, and your sock method won't either.

    13. Re:Excuse to piss in public by PolarBearFire · · Score: 1

      Wait till some Homeland Security dumbass issues the first false alarm and you'll be know as the guy with pissed soaked lips yelling at people to do the same ;)

    14. Re:Excuse to piss in public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked in a fertilizer factory using a lot of ammonia. As long as you can actually inhale the air, the consentration of ammonia is not a big deal. If you can't breathe anymore it's time to get out of there (duh.) However, you won't die unless you pass out from lack of oxygen. I don't know the consentration, but you will stop being able to breathe long before you can see the brown gas filling the factory :)

    15. Re:Excuse to piss in public by GottMitUns · · Score: 1

      There were no nerve agents used during WWI as far as I know. They only used irritants - chlorine, mustard etc.

    16. Re:Excuse to piss in public by jamiethehutt · · Score: 1

      This was commonly done in WWI during nerve gas attacks. With lack of gas masks, the best way to protect yourself was to breathe through a cloth soaked in ammonia. Piss being the easiest source of it.

      Thankfully there was no such thing as nerve gas during ether world war. They used chlorine gas which dissolved in the moisture in the victims lungs to make hydrochloric acid which then dissolved their lungs.

      Nerve gas however doesn't even need to be inhaled, it's absorbed through the skin where it overloads the nervous system and I don't actually know much about how it works other than that...

    17. Re:Excuse to piss in public by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If you really worried about it, you could just carry around a water filter.
      No, if you really worried about it you'd carry a full NBC suit around everywhere.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Excuse to piss in public by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Modern nerve agents are absorbed through the skin in lethal amounts. Holding your breath, wearing a respirator, or sucking through a piss-drenched sock is not going to help you. Try to get away from the nerve agent, get outside, and hope there wasn't a lot of it.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    19. Re:Excuse to piss in public by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Why? Are you hoping to persuade him to cancel Bionic Woman or Journeyman before you die, so you can feel that at least you left the world a better place? Or is this retribution for whoever allowed Dane Cook to host two episodes of Saturday Night Live?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    20. Re:Excuse to piss in public by YU5333021 · · Score: 1

      replying to myself... I said I was being serious. I lied. It was supposed to be a joke. I'm appalled by my informative mod.

      On the other hand, it has sparked a good discussion where people have shown clearly why such an approach would not work. Thanks to all :)

    21. Re:Excuse to piss in public by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Well, if he's on his hands and knees LONG enough, he might get AmmoKnesia...

      Hopefully, he's not scrubbing floors in an adult male porn studio... He might WISH he could get amnesia from ammonia...

      (Coffee commercials of the 70s come, umm arrive to mind:

      Maxwell house... Good to the last drop

      Mountain Grown Folgers

      Fill it to the rim... with Brim...

      And... Ball Park Franks... the PLUMP when you cook'em.. BOOM BOOOM BOOOOM...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    22. Re:Excuse to piss in public by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Yeh, you die, but get a major boner first...

      How... comf..farting

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    23. Re:Excuse to piss in public by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Yeh... a major pissing contest... Survival of the fittest.... (or fit test... depending on how much yoo-rhine you need...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    24. Re:Excuse to piss in public by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Given the typical 'merkun diet, I'd venture to say that breathing in such urine/urea in quantitiy needed to offset the chemical agent could be more harmful to one's health than the chemical agent.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  14. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by theMerovingian · · Score: 2, Informative


    then you stick them in a monkey and his testicles melt or his hair falls out

    Military members are statutorily barred from suing the government for injuries arising in the line of duty. See here.

    Government contractors are also immune from products liability suits, so long as the product in question was designed according to military specifications. See here.

    Things the recruiter doesn't tell you... Hopefully the government tests carefully before using!

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
  15. "Begging the question" by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    Okay, here's today's English lesson.

    Beg the question

    This phrase is so misused that its incorrect meaning has almost become the primary meaning.

    The incorrect meaning I am referring to is "which brings up the question..." This usage ignores the original meaning which was to point out a logical flaw in an argument where the arguer has tried to establish a point based on a proposition which is assumed.

    The Israelis also have this thing for living in the rightful homeland of the Jewish people.

    Doesn't that beg the question?

    1. Re:"Begging the question" by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      So you want to debate whether Israel is the rightful homeland of the Jewish people in a thread off an article about a nerve-gas antidote?

      Yeah, you're a troll. Go take a class in Israeli history.

    2. Re:"Begging the question" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You brought it up.

      Israel is a white European religious colony-state - and has been an increasingly expensive luxury item for the west for decades now.

    3. Re:"Begging the question" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You started it!

    4. Re:"Begging the question" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No land is rightful.

      Jews murdered and displaced millions of Palestinians who were living there. They didn't do shit to the jews. Gee, wonder why they're pissed now?

    5. Re:"Begging the question" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source?

    6. Re:"Begging the question" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't do shit to the jews. Actually, the Arabs conquered us and made us second-class citizens in our own homeland. They just didn't do it in living memory, so nobody cares.

      Welcome to the Middle East.
    7. Re:"Begging the question" by DavidShor · · Score: 1
      ""What would they do with the 50,000 civilians in the two cities ... Not even Ben-Gurion could offer a solution, and during the discussion at operation headquarters, he remained silent, as was his habit in such situations. Clearly, we could not leave [Lydda's] hostile and armed populace in our rear, where it could endanger the supply route [to the troops who were] advancing eastward. ... Allon repeated the question: What is to be done with the population? Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture that said: Drive them out! ... 'Driving out' is a term with a harsh ring ... Psychologically, this was one of the most difficult actions we undertook. The population of [Lydda] did not leave willingly. There was no way of avoiding the use of force and warning shots in order to make the inhabitants march the 10 to 15 miles to the point where they met up with the legion. (Soldier of Peace, p. 140-141)" -Yitzhak Rabin, former Prime Minister of Israel.

      "At least 55% of the total of the exodus was caused by our (Haganah/IDF) operations." To this figure, the report's compilers add the operations of the Irgun and Lehi, which "directly (caused) some 15%... of the emigration". ... This leads to a figure of 73% for departures caused directly by the Israelis. In addition, the report attributes 22% of the departures to "fears" and "a crisis of confidence" affecting the Palestinian population. As for Arab calls for flight, these were reckoned to be significant in only 5% of cases..." - "The emigration of Palestinian Arabs in the period 1/12/1947-1/6/1948" by SHAI military intelligence of Haganah.

      "Israeli vans with loudspeakers drove through the streets ordering all the inhabitants to evacuate immediately, and such as were reluctant to leave were forcibly ejected from their homes by the triumphant Israelis whose policy was now openly one of clearing out all the Arab civil population before them .... From the surrounding villages and hamlets, during the next two or three days, all the inhabitants were uprooted and set off on the road to Ramallah.... No longer was there any "reasonable persuasion". Bluntly, the Arab inhabitants were ejected and forced to flee into Arab territory.... Wherever the Israeli troops advanced into Arab country the Arab population was bulldozed out in front of them"-O'Ballance, Edgar (1956): The Arab-Israeli War 1948. London: Faber and Faber, p. 147, 172.

      I could go on and on. Nobody with any knowledge of history disputes that Israel expelled at the very least, ten's of thousands of Palestinians.

    8. Re:"Begging the question" by DavidShor · · Score: 1
      I am an Israeli Jew, and well aware of Israeli history.

      Jews have about as much right to live in Israel as the Roma Gypsies have a right to live in Kashmir. Persecution is not a consistent justification for the creation of a religious state.

      Moreover, even accepting the validity of that tenuous concept (that persecuted people have the right to a homeland), there is reason that the Jews had to have Israel. They could have settled in West Texas, Belize, Uganda, etc. Past persecution definitely did not justify the mass expulsion of native Palestinians.

      Yes, they were expelled, they did not run away. The idea that Palestinians all fled because of the words of their Arab leaders was a propaganda myth told by a fledgling state to keep their people together. Israel opened their state archives in the 1980's, and their records indicate that indeed, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were kicked out of their homes. I've provided some evidence earlier in the thread, but if you wish, I'd be glad to provide credible Israeli sources.

    9. Re:"Begging the question" by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Jews have about as much right to live in Israel as the Roma Gypsies have a right to live in Kashmir. Persecution is not a consistent justification for the creation of a religious state. What, you claim the Roma are from Kashmir? Actually, Wikipedia says they came from Punjab and Rajasthan.

      Jews don't have a claim to Israel because we were persecuted; we have a claim to it because it's where we come from. And while I agree that driving out Palestinians is a Bad Thing, their presence (especially given how they got there) does not negate our right to our homeland.

      But why should I bother arguing with a self-hating Israeli? If you try to talk to one, the rest want your attention.
  16. Chelle would have loved these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when I was flooding the Enrichment Center with a deadly neurotoxin.

    I can show you, too. Just wait a moment while I warm up the neurotoxin emitters.

    -- GLaDOS

  17. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by neapolitan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Exactly - every doctor learned this back in medical school; atropine is a temporary fix (anti-cholinergic) and pralidoxime allows regeneration of AChesterase to some degree so your body can naturally remove it. It's a little bit of a juggling act, and needs monitoring for levels. Most (civilian) MDs see something like this with pesticide spray (farmer inadvertently sticks his hand in liquid "nerve gas" organophosphate bug spray, etc.) not chemical attacks, but we all get training in this (standard emergency medicine situation).

    The new drug is also an oxime -- you can look at the compound and it "looks" like two pralidoxime molecules joined together with a short linking segment (compare this to this. The goal is potency -- I've never personally injected pralidoxime, but I understand its effects on regeneration are limited.

    Interestingly enough, in the otherwise healthy individual atropine would "just" cause your heartrate to skyrocket. If I were Nick Cage in that scene, I would go ahead and inject it into a vein, not the heart. Intra-cardiac injection can be used, but only as a last, last resort (e.g. the person is about to go unconscious, they are the only ones who can deliver the medication, no IV to use / no way to reliably otherwise introduce the drug, etc. etc.) It makes for dramatic movie moments, though!

    --
    Slashdotter, ID #101. UIDs are in binary, right?
  18. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by sholden · · Score: 1

    And of course if it kills your family gets to sue the drug company, even though you were going to die anyway. Win/win.

  19. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by wizardforce · · Score: 1

    If these lands are so valuable as religious resources, then every single occupier of that land would have had to keep the surrounding countries at bay for the entire occupation. Since that is clearly not the case, given the long periods of relative peace prior WWI, I don't see how having "key cities" is in any way apropos to the conversation unless you are also arguing that Israel is in some way preventing foreign pilgrims from accessing these monuments.
    Israel has been conquered 34 times last count because of these holy sites, the land that later became Israel was under the control of the Ottoman empire which the former state of Palestine was broken into pieces, one for Israel and a planned Islamic state. After the six-days war, Israel gained more territory which lead to the displacement of even more people. Israel also had the habit of retaliating in response to suicide bombings and other violent aggression which didn't help things either.

    Are you saying that Israel has no fault in this and that it is purely a matter of the claimants not "burying the hatchet"?
    No, don't assume that I am condoning anything that Israel did or did not do, the issue is a little more complicated than "Israel doesn't communicate effectively enough". There are a good number of people in the area that view Israli occupation of religious sites to be repulsive to say the least regardless of how open the sites really are to pilgrimages.
    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  20. FDA approval doesn't mean its safe by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    The FDA isn't going to approve it without sufficient testing.
    While I agree it will be thoroughly tested, I don't think that's enough reason for people to get comfortable... While I think they do a pretty reasonable job considering, the FDA has approved many things that have turned out to be anything but safe.
    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    1. Re:FDA approval doesn't mean its safe by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Well... They have an easy one this time. It only has to be safer than nerve gas.

  21. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great now I know that when a terrorist throws a nerve gas bomb I can survive and watch how Jack Bauer kills all of the terrorists.

  22. Atropine is SCARY by yamamushi · · Score: 1

    I remember way back when, drinking some belladonna tea to get the hallucinatory effects of atropine.. http://erowid.org/experiences/exp.php?ID=30718 My experience posted up on Erowid, gah it's scary stuff.

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
  23. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Belial6 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You know, 8 years ago, I would have agreed that this would never be tested, and I don't think the FDA will, but 8 years ago, I would not have believed that bringing someone to the edge of drowning to force a confession or get information would be something the US government would openly admit to either. If the government is openly admitting to basically the same kind of actions that were condemned as atrocities committed by the witch hunters of early America, I don't see how there would be much issue for them to perform chemical experiments on secret prison inmates.

    I also think that the genie is out of the bottle, so if this line does get crossed, I don't think it will be limited to only one party or the other.

  24. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Entropius · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sadly there's one bit of military equipment that desperately needed testing before being used in the line of duty, but didn't receive it: the current Commander-in-Chief.

  25. one little thing overlooked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The test subjects had all been subjected to abnormal levels of radiation, throwing off their ATC readings. If you had actually read the information contained in the public reports and... uh, been a doctor, you would have found that over half of the patients tested positive for antidepressants marketed in the United States. ZERO PERCENT of the patients NOT on the drugs tested positive for any of the "criminal" symptoms.

    Just thought I'd throw that out there.

    LOL @ my bot-check word being "receptor"

  26. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by dirtsurfer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey man, you want a hit of this? This stuff'll melt the testicles off a monkey

  27. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by Entropius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The whole thing is a wonderful ball of insanity, as everybody thinks that their own interpretation of the Invisible Friend in the Sky wants them to occupy some particular patch of dirt.

    If anyone's technically to blame for the problems in the Middle East, it's the Jews -- the ancient Jews, who were the first to invent the eternally-PMS'ing, cranky, smite-happy, horse-blinders-distributing warmongering Jehovah.

    The world would be a much more peaceful place if the three Abrahamic religions vanished tomorrow.

  28. Nothing new here by mysterious_mark · · Score: 2, Informative

    The US Military has been using Atropine auto injectors since the 70's, but there's no requirement for FDA approval. There's also a auto injector of Pam-2 chloride to be used to neutralize the toxicity of the Atropine. The Atropine and Pam-2 chloride injectors are issued in a box of two each that each soldier/sailor/marine carries when at 'MOPP' level anticipating a chemical attack or training for such. Anyone whose been through basic training or who has trained with a combat related unit probably has fond memories of long hours spent in MOPP suites, gas masks, and practice with the fake injectors for training. The only difference I see with this new antidote is that's its FDA approved for civilian use. Mark

    1. Re:Nothing new here by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a doctor I will point out the difference for you.

            if we're talking about oximes - we're talking about carbamate/organophospate poisoning. These chemicals interact with an enzyme called acetyl cholinesterase, present in the synapses of nerves. As you probably know/remember, acetyl choline is a key neurotransmitter in the brain and the parasympathetic nervous system, as well as the terminal motor connection. When these poisons are applied, they reversibly (carbamates) or irreversibly (organophosphates) bind to acetyl choline and inhibit it.

            What this does is prevent the breakdown of acetyl choline in the synapses and terminal motor plate, resulting in excessive parasympathetic stimulation (blood pressure drop, sweating, mucosal secretion, etc), muscular paralysis, and CNS effects. But it's the muscular paralysis (especially the respiratory muscles) that kill you.

            Now, what atropine does is bind to acetyl choline receptors. The idea here is that if I have more acetyl choline in the synapse but block the receptor, then the neurons won't be stimulated as much (because the receptors are blocked even if the neurotransmitter concentration is through the roof). This works in cases of mild intoxication (such as carbamates, where the inhibition of acetyl choline is reversible and will decrease over time). This does NOT work with organophosphates (because the enzyme is junked and new enzyme needs to be synthesized, which will take days/weeks).

            Now oximes, which have been around for a while, are compounds that are capable of breaking off the organophosphate from its binding site on acetyl cholinesterase. As far as I recall when I studied medicine a few years ago, this only worked within the first few hours of intoxication, because the newly bound protein eventually went a structural reconfiguration which made the process irreversible. However if these scientists have come up with an oxime that is capable of undoing the damage even after the conformational change of the protein, this is newsworthy indeed.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Nothing new here by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      correction (for not proofreading), last line of first paragraph - the poisons bind to acetyl cholinesterase, not acetyl choline. Sorry, it was a typo.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  29. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

    I don't know the history, but in 1987(and certainly earlier) the US military had this for the 'troops'. It was in 2 injectors, not one.

    Now it's in one. That's what's new.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  30. YU's epitaph (without spelling errors) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here lies old YU, done in by the mob.
    The gas didn't get him, though it would have done a good job.
    Halfway down he slid his left sock,
    but his piss was already released in his jock.

  31. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


    It's not about religion or about not forgetting the past. It really isn't. There is an ongoing situation that remains today. We have now a whole generation of displaced people who grew up in refugee camps. The palestinian people are embargoed with all entrances and exits controlled by Israeli forces. Their government ministers can't even visit another country without Israel's permission and trade and supplies have been blocked as a means of punishing the Palestinian people. When the Palestinian people elected by a clear majority a government that the Israeli's didn't approve of (Hamas), trade was blocked, international assets frozen and money withdrawn (the Palestinians are not allowed financial independence in much the same way that a person pinned in a wrestling match is not allowed to get an arm free). Israel even bombed a power station to ensure that electricity became more expensive and unreliable.

    Israel now supports an alternative government that it does approve of which has tried, with partial success, to overthrow the one that was elected. The militia of this government has even been allowed abroad so that they can receive free training from the US or UK military (I forget which, I think US). Hamas was elected because they proved more trustworthy to the Palestinian people who were tired of the corruption of the previous government, had been heavily involved in preserving order, keeping schools and surgeries going. Hamas were the ones that got that British journalist released earlier this year. But Hamas are not liked by the Israeli and US governments. Hence the punishment of the Palestinian people for electing them.

    The deputy leader of Hamas indicated that they would be willing to negotiate peace and accept the state of Israel. That is inconvenient to Israel as it doesn't really help them denounce the group as terrorist. But when a majority of a people elect a party, you can't really say that they're a terrorist group and that friction with them is terrorism. It is friction with a country, and to negotiate peace you have to engage with them, not install a government that will say what you want them to say and pretend that it's the will of the people.

    Now what in all that depends on religious differences or past wrongs? The greatest trick of the Israeli government is to say that they are synonymous with the jewish people. That to be jewish is to support the Israeli government and that to condemn the Israeli government for its collective inhumanity is to be against the jewish people. That's a lie and it's one that Israel has used to great effect over the last forty years. There are many deeply religious people on all sides that would welcome peace and co-existence in a city that is holy to all of them. But power and money keep getting in the way.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  32. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having had NBCDC training in the navy. I'm not sure I would want to survive the after effects of a nerve agent.

  33. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The principles of the Hamas are stated in their Covenant or Charter, given in full below. Following are highlights.

    "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it."

    "The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up. "

    "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors."

    "After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying." [taken from www.mideastweb.org/hamas.htm]

    "Israel will rise and will remain erect until Islam eliminates it as it had eliminated its predecessors." [http://www.palestinecenter.org/cpap/documents/charter.html Preamble]

    Doesn't sound like a peaceful government to me. How do you reckon that Hamas doesn't want to co-exist with a Jewish Israel state? Hamas is a _recognized_ terrorist organization due to its actions. Suicide bombing, declared jihad, and the obliteration of the Jewish state of Israel are the key points against Israel.

    Furthermore, Hamas swayed Palestinian public opinion by promising social programs. All I've seen this government do in the last year is fight a civil war inside Gaza. How is increasing violence between Gaza refugees helping the Palestinians in that region?

    As far as refugees, also consider that nearly 700k - 900k Jewish residents in Arab states were expelled out of Israel's surrounding neighbors. Compare this with the 750k displaced Moslem Arabs from the State of Israel. More Jews were displaced from their home in more countries and moved into Israel than Arabs had from Israel to neighboring countries. Many of these from countries that are not direct neighbors with Israel. The Middle East conflict is not entirely centered around countries sharing borders with Israel, and yet no one holds Yemen, Morocco, and other North African nations at fault for brutal state-sponsored discrimination of ethnic and religious peoples. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_lands]

    Everyone enjoys throwing out facts about the displaced Moslem Arabs, but consider also the displaced Jewish residents abroad. Only then can your argument hold any ground.

  34. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    Hopefully the government tests carefully before using!



    Of course they will ! Why, they've got plenty of test subjects that can't sue if anything goes wrong.

  35. You cannot come to terms with hatred by Shivetya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Israel has the unfortunate problem of being an overly convienent scapegoat for its neighbor's internal problems. What better way to refocus the ire of your own people by pointing them to Israel. As such Israel has to take steps that others see as extreme or even ludicrous. No reasonable party would use nerve gas on a civilian population, right? Same as no reasonable party would bomb civilians with suicide/homicide bombers, right?

    Read : When dealing with an unreasonable enemy you take steps that most sane people would consider unreasonable.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  36. Don't freak out over ammonia. by Neuticle · · Score: 1

    You've obviously never been around a farm where ammonia tanks are kept. Hell, I probably fart more than 2ppm! A quick google check gives exposure limits of 25-300ppm depending on regulation authority and exposure type, and the LC50 for a mouse was over 5000ppm@1 hour!

    I know a grizzled old farmer who could take a deep breath of fresh air, and without a mask or goggles, shut off a valve when some meth-head broke in and left one open. He'd done it multiple times. Granted, the guy is a complete badass, but still, ammonia is safe enough to use as a household cleaner (albeit not anhydrous).

    You want real chemical weapons?
    I was an EMT near the Umatilla Chemical Weapons depot, home of a lot of the USA's nastiest chemical weapons. Things that will kill in 100 mgs or less. (VX, GB etc, now being safely disposed of). We had the atropine injectors on standby for disasters, and given the deteriorating state of the bunkers and munitions, that's a good thing.

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
    1. Re:Don't freak out over ammonia. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Things that will kill in 100 mgs or less. (VX, GB etc, now being safely disposed of).



      I think you mean 100 ug, not mg. A substance that you need milligrams of in order to kill a human (e.g. potassium cyanide) is "relatively non-toxic" when compared to nerve agents.

    2. Re:Don't freak out over ammonia. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      (VX, GB etc, now being safely disposed of).

      Today, they're actually taking _some_ effort in disposing of the stuff. I recall that a while ago, the procedure to dispose of VX was "fill old ship with VX munitions and sink it in the middle of the Atlantic ocean".

    3. Re:Don't freak out over ammonia. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      How about a pharm with atropine, steroids AND phosgene??? Hell, you could save yourself from growing hair excessively, from pharting 12ppm, but get to drown...

      (Anyone still using phosgene in refrigeration plants? We did aboard ship in '85...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    4. Re:Don't freak out over ammonia. by Neuticle · · Score: 1

      For direct liquid-on-skin exposure, yes- less than 100mcg is quite leathal, but that is now how VX is delivered as a weapon. It is a possible handling accident scenario though. For inhalation, the dose is estimated (obviously this hasn't been tested on humans in a controlled trial) around 30-50 mg*min/m^3. So it's really just semantics :) I think we can agree it is pure nasty.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VX_(nerve_agent)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umatilla_Chemical_Depot

      --
      "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  37. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by MrConspiracy · · Score: 1

    Right. The Mark I was two separate auto-injectors (2-pam chloride is somewhat more formally 2-pralidoxime chloride) Duodote is nice because it's in one package and it's now officially safe. Massachusetts, at least, allowed EMS to carry Mark I's to stick themselves and "fellow authorized emergency responders" with, and indeed gave them away for a while. The catch was that they don't have an especially long shelf life, so some private companies didn't bite because they would have been required to restock them at cost. It doesn't look like anything's going to change now.

  38. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

    A typical dose for atropine is 0.4 mg and is that very useful for colds and before surgery or dental work becuase it dries you up pretty good and ounces stuff isn't running down your throat; for nerve gas antidote that typical dose of atropine is 2.0 mg and it's not unusual for a second dose to be give 10 minutes later if the patients heart rate isn't at 120 and is very usful for keeping gallons of stuff from running down your thorat. We also classify nerve agent as reversable and irriversable i.e. a trversable agent is one where an antidote will reactivate the ACE denatured by the nerve gass, these oximes will only work with the reversables; if you get into something irreversable like VX the oximes are useless.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  39. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by budgenator · · Score: 1
    you stick them in a monkey and his testicles melt or his hair falls out.

    Pvt Snuffy " Sarge look at me, I sat down on that nerve agent antidote injecter and acccidently stuck myself in the ass; now my hair is falling out and my testicles are melting!"

    Sgt Rock "I don't know what you bitching about there Soldier, if the Government wanted you to have a pair, they'd have issued them to you, and that hair shit is purely cosmetic, you wannna look good for the enemy or something, I hear they like pretty boys if you know what I mean?

    Pvt Snuffy " But Sarge"

    Sgt Rock " No buts about it, here sign this "Statement of Charges" so we can take the cost of that wasted injector outa your pay, the money you save not buying condoms and getting hair cuts should just about cover it. Now suck it up and drive on HURRRAH!"

    We had a guy, he sort of the accident waiting to happen type, and he had gotten a hold of a live atropine autoinjector that was expred. In a NBC class he was intending to demonstrate the injector by activating it aganst a piece of cardboard; so what happened is he injected it through the cardboard and into his thumb and he's walking arround with the needle stuck in the bone! So we had to ship him off the the ER to get a tetanus shot, the needle pulled out and monitor him for fifty time the normal dose of atropine in his system. Years later I saw him again and he managed to cut the same thumb off to the first joint with a table saw.
    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  40. Terminology Error by em+guy · · Score: 1

    Generally, nerve agents are not gasses they are liquids. The V series agents (i.e. VX) are persistent, non-volatile liquids meaning that they don't evaporate or produce vapors at a significant rate. The G series agents (i.e. GB aka sarin, which was used in the Tokyo subway attack) are also liquids. They are much more volatile and produce harmful vapors, but they are liquids at room temperature not gasses.

  41. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by budgenator · · Score: 1

    The problems with the movie is the auto injetors are normally injected IM into the v. Lateralis, 2 at 2 mg atropine each (and I did mean 2.0 not 0.2 mg) if the victim is symptomatic and the second problem is most military nerve agnets have a biological half-life of about two weeks (atropine is what about 6 hour?) and you can absorb LD-50 in about 18 seconds so your pretty shit-outa-luck with out a chem suit and protective mask. Also the agent like VX would persist in that enviroment for about a year.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  42. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by budgenator · · Score: 1

    The Palestinians left at the urging of their "Arab Brothers" and when they did their "Brothers" stuck them in the refugee camps permantly for the PR value that sticking them in camps and blaming Isreal woulkd have. They could have became Isreali citizens way back when, and if they did instead of leaving, Isreal would be voting on makeing Islam the official religion today!

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  43. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 80's, I was working on a project where we modified rabbits to enable them to withstand sarin. The interesting part of that, was that it took 36 hours +- 2 hours before the rabbits reacted to our treatments. This will nullify that work.

  44. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Parent post gets modded 'insightful' instead of 'flamebait' or at the very least 'offtopic'? What's it got to do with nerve gas treatments?

  45. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by oh2 · · Score: 1

    I was trained as a NBC specialist for a swedish civil defence unit in the mid nineties and we had a comprehensive education about nerve agents and countermeasures. The Swedish armed forces and civil defence units had autoinjectors with atropine and a combination of enzymes. The enzymes were developed by the army and helped counteract the toxicity of the nerve agents. It was a single injector, not several as other countries use. Valium in low doses was also to be distributed when there was a danger of chemical attack, it has no effect on the nerve agents but supposedly reduced panic and would help you get the protective gear on faster, lol. I doubt that any really effective antidotes can be made to nerve agents. The lethal dose is so small even with the weakest ones like Tabun and Sarin and they are so fast acting.

    --

    Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

  46. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone involved in this area of research I can assure you that oximes are not new, but are still being investigated as one of the only effective treatments.

    An overview as to how they work.

    The organophosphate (nerve agent) binds to acetylcholinesterase (nerves) and butyrlcholinesterase (blood) enzymes at first in a non-permanent fashion. Through a process called aging the binding becomes permanent. Oximes can stop the permanent bonding if given quickly enough.

    Atropine and oximes are used by many countries as autoinjectors. Different countries use their favorite oxime. 2-PAM, and HI-6 are two examples.

    All of this is out in the literature and has been for a long time.

  47. Uhhh, thanks! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Boy, To Girl: They may release nerve gas. I don't want to die...a virgin.

    Girl: Oh, don't worry! I've got this antidote injector right here!

    Boy: That's...that's just great.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  48. New Nerve Gas...what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please change the title of this article to: New Nerve Gas Anecdotes

  49. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by budgenator · · Score: 1

    OBTW the OSHA and Army reg's require an annual testing respirators (Gas Masks) with an "irritant smoke" the civs use an smoke, but the Army uses CS, but there is no requirement to remove the mask in an irritating environment, other than a slightly sadistic tradition. I was in the NG and one year we were scheduled to use the gas-shack at Fort Custer, I had everything set up ready to go and was waiting for some troops, when the Marines began to arrive. I told the Marine Reserves NBC NCO, that we were scheduled but the more the merrier. The Marines road-marched 12 miles to the gas-shack with full rucksacks on a nice hot sweaty day went into the chamber that had about 3 times more CS in the air than I'd have used, and then started to do calisthenics in there. I'll tell you what, the guys that had a good seal had a GOOD seal, so I sent my guys through with the Marines, Muhahahaah. It amazed me how many people had a good seal and fit until they bent over or move a certain way.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  50. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by Entropius · · Score: 1

    Now what in all that depends on religious differences or past wrongs?

    The fact that Israel had to be founded where it is. If the Jewish people wanted a homeland, there are plenty of places that aren't already occupied by crazies, but it *had* to be Jerusalem/Israel because of the religious implications. Note the name of the movement: they're not "Jewish nationalists", they're "Zionists", since it's important to have not just *any* homeland but to have *Zion*. We could have given them West Texas, for instance, which is pretty empty and has a climate roughly similar to Israel. But that won't do, since it's important to occupy the same patch of dirt as those people a long time ago who *first* got the idea of cutting off the end of your penis.

    My comments aren't meant to condone the nasty things either the Israelis or Palestinians have done, but to point out that all the friction is at heart caused by religious desires.

  51. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by Entropius · · Score: 1

    Not every post has to be a reply to the original article.

    Some posts can be replies to other posts. This is why we have this nifty "threaded" comment model, where posts can be replies to each other.

    Neat, huh?

  52. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd spotted that, thanks all the same for the sarcasm.

    Not sure how that works with the 'offtopic' mod then?

    I'm neither Jewish, nor pro or anti Jewish, by the way.

    Just thought that this was a tech board primarily, not a soapbox for loonies.

    (Althought I do love the humour!)

  53. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    They also misrepresent the downsides of atropine use.

    Basically organophosphates (including certain pesticides and all current generations of nerve gasses) work by disabling cholinesterase. When this enzyme is disabled, Ach builds up in nerve endings and never stops, hence the nerve essentially loses its off-switch. Eventually the muscles whcih support breathing seize up and/or paralyze from overstimulation, and the subject dies.

    Atropine works by binding to the same receptors as ACH without activating them, hence turning off the nerves artificially. It is toxic, and the combination of the two together ought to have some interesting side effects (which interestingly have been known since ancient times-- there were certain Greek cults which used a combination of muscarine-producing mushrooms and belladonna in initiation rituals). At very least, the subject would be incapacitated for the duration of the poisoning.

    However, if you can re-activate the cholinesterase directly, then the level of side effects from the poison go way down.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  54. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    But, how much do we know of whether China, Japan, Russia, and even the USA (at Aberdeen Proving Grounds/Georgia/name some not-really-heard-much-about-place in USA) DID test on live persons, maybe prisoners granted early release for participation?

    If the FDA IS approving of them then viable results must have happened. As to whether "early release" is true, it could mean early release from "corporeal day-to-day existence". Can't have parolees blabbing that they got out early for accepting horrid injections with antidotes working just fine in minutes. That could reinvigorate then-USSR efforts to make even more irreversible chemical agents.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  55. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Yep, I remember that I too had to go thru the two-arms injection/cattle door, too. Simultaneous injections in each arm, almost like a hypo spray in Star Trek, IIRC...

    Most of us got sick for a few days, up to a week or more for some. Cold-like symptoms, tho some felt like it was the flu. We were told it was to keep us all from becoming sick from one another as with 70-90 ppl in a given barracks all sorts of bugs/illnesses converge to further weaken those weak or sick upon arrival to boot camp.

    Thing is, we never knew what REALLY was in those injections. But, I still have my hair, my balls and nothing seems mutated. Any lapses in memory might be from my own nutritional habits, or from messing around with paint chips on the walls as a kid. But, there COULD be some latent effects from my exposure to JP-5 we used for cleaning the UNREP span wires various equipment aboard ship. Imagine what Jet Engine technicians were/are exposed to. All those compounds into the skin, inhaled, absorbed into they eyes/mucous membranes...

    yeesh...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  56. What's the analogy here? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Sigh.

    The phrase isn't misused. In the absence of the rhetorical term called "begging the question," the words in the phrase "begs the question" are, in fact, equivalent to "raises [or asks for] the question."

    It really has dual meaning: the meaning of the words themselves and the historical usage of the phrase in rhetorical circles.

    Consider also, the phrase, "You're a dick." It could mean that the speaker is implying you're a member of the fraternity of people named, "Richard." It could also be a slang figure of speech calling you out as a pedantic jackass who wants to pretend s/he's superior to people by declaring one common use of a phrase as inferior to another common use of that phrase.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  57. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new nutless monkey overlords.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  58. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by EricTheMad · · Score: 1

    Valium in low doses was also to be distributed when there was a danger of chemical attack, it has no effect on the nerve agents but supposedly reduced panic and would help you get the protective gear on faster, lol. The CANA auto-injector used by the US military contains Valium But it's used to prevent seizures in soldiers exposed to nerve agents. Although, I understand an unusually large number of CANA injectors turned up as "field losses" after Desert Storm.
    --
    -- Remember, we're not happy until you're not happy. -- Local FAA Inspector --
  59. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this marked as flamebait? The US government has demonstrated that there really are no lines it's unwilling to cross.

    Why would nerve-gas antidote testing be that much worse than the Tuskegee syphilis experiments, for instance?

  60. Re:Combined, yes. But not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those jet injectors did suck. But at least it was only in boot camp that I had to deal with that.

    Dunno 'bout the JP-5... It's also a mild laxative if it gets into the potable water supply because some grape nut somehow found a fitting adapter he shouldn't have had, didn't notice the blue pipe, and fate had the valve lineup just right. (Nothing that fast-cycling the reserve tanks and flushing with a bit extra calcium hypochlorite couldn't fix in a few days...) I'm still living, so it couldn't have been that bad...

    But it's stuff like the dry cleaning solvents, PD-680 and some tetracloride something or other for removing oil & grease from things that bugged me. Didn't have too much of a smell, fumes could still get you a little woozy, and it could dry out the hands and make them itch a lot if gloves weren't handy (or more often the case too clumsy and ill-fitting to be practical under some senior chief's "get 'er done" timeframe.)

  61. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Think about it again more carefully.

    If they really did have such deadly weapons of mass destruction, why haven't they tried using them to kill lots of us who are their enemies? It's not as if they are afraid of dying or afraid of the IDF (remember all those homicide bombers before the security barrier went up?).

    They are also not short of crazy people who would use them against us. So why no attacks?

    They've got lots of missiles they keep sending into our country. So why haven't they put any deadly chems inside their missiles?

    Obviously they don't have any such weapons. It's just the usual scare politics to frighten us to spend more of our taxes on defence industry which pays money to our corupt politicians to expand defence industry.

  62. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by DavidShor · · Score: 1
    "Doesn't sound like a peaceful government to me. How do you reckon that Hamas doesn't want to co-exist with a Jewish Israel state? Hamas is a _recognized_ terrorist organization due to its actions. Suicide bombing, declared jihad, and the obliteration of the Jewish state of Israel are the key points against Israel."

    Ever read Irgun's charter? The highlight was the part where they said, "Political violence and terrorism" were "legitimate tools in the Jewish national struggle for the Land of Israel". Kind of radical, considering they were the second largest militia in the 48 war, and that their ministers served in high-ranking posts in Israeli government.

    Seriously, every independence movement used terrorism, including ours. Get over yourself and get off your moral high ground. Keep in mind, Israel has killed far more innocent civilians than the Palestinians have. You might say "it's only because of the terrorists", or you can even say "they use human shields"(And by the way, my first cousin is in the Sayeret Egoz of the IDF, and he assures me that they use human shields too). Nevertheless, the fact remains: More people that are innocent have died because of Israel's actions than the Palestinians'. Yes, the intentions were different, but that is of little concern to the innocent man who was killed.

    I'm not condemning Israel. I am just pointing out that your moral language is useless and inconsistent in this argument, and that Israel has no moral authority in this conflict.

    "Furthermore, Hamas swayed Palestinian public opinion by promising social programs. All I've seen this government do in the last year is fight a civil war inside Gaza. How is increasing violence between Gaza refugees helping the Palestinians in that region?"

    Don't you think that had anything to do with Israel's complete embargo into the country after their victory? The West Bank's GDP decreased by over 40% over the course of two months after Israel shut down all trade and aid. There was absolutely no money for new social programs, and a great deal of them had to be shut down.

    "As far as refugees, also consider that nearly 700k - 900k Jewish residents in Arab states were expelled out of Israel's surrounding neighbors. Compare this with the 750k displaced Moslem Arabs from the State of Israel."

    Two rights do not make a wrong. My parents were some of those Jews who were displaced(Morocco), but they had nothing to do with the forced expulsion of the Palestinians from their homes.

    By the way, most of those countries, Morocco included, have granted an unlimited right of return to the Sephardi Jews. Is Israel prepared to do such a thing?

  63. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by DavidShor · · Score: 1
    "The Palestinians left at the urging of their "Arab Brothers" and when they did their "Brothers" stuck them in the refugee camps permantly for the PR value that sticking them in camps and blaming Isreal woulkd have."

    That is not true, at all. Look up Operation Dani, where the Arab cities of Ramle and Lydda were emptied. Let me quote Yitzhak Rabin, a former prime minister of Israel.

    ""What would they do with the 50,000 civilians in the two cities ... Not even Ben-Gurion could offer a solution, and during the discussion at operation headquarters, he remained silent, as was his habit in such situations. Clearly, we could not leave [Lydda's] hostile and armed populace in our rear, where it could endanger the supply route [to the troops who were] advancing eastward. ... Allon repeated the question: What is to be done with the population? Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture that said: Drive them out! ... 'Driving out' is a term with a harsh ring ... Psychologically, this was one of the most difficult actions we undertook. The population of [Lydda] did not leave willingly. There was no way of avoiding the use of force and warning shots in order to make the inhabitants march the 10 to 15 miles to the point where they met up with the legion. (Soldier of Peace, p. 140-141)"

    New documents from Israel's state archives indicate that most of the Arabs were expelled from Israel, they did not run away. In fact, Israeli SHAI military intelligence documents from the time indicate that the words and actions of the "Arab brothers" were only responsible for 5% of the total exodus.

    Please reread your history.

  64. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by DavidShor · · Score: 1

    Could I have a source?

  65. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by DavidShor · · Score: 1

    How many times has it been conquered in the last 500 years? And how many times in the period from 1500-1900?

  66. Re:Why does Israel continue to be a pariah in the by budgenator · · Score: 1

    point taken, but still you'd think that their "Arab Brothers" and fellow Muslims could have found better accommodations after all these years for them

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds