Slashdot Mirror


Robots That Bounce on Water

inghamb87 writes "The way water striders walk on water was discovered years ago. The insect uses its long legs to help evenly distribute its tiny body weight. The weight is distributed over a large area so that the fragile skin formed by surface tension supports the bug on the water. However, the ability of water striders to jump onto water without sinking has baffled scientists, until now." If nothing less, you need to see the picture: it's awesome.

137 comments

  1. Walking on water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our new water-walking robotic overlords.

    1. Re:Walking on water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoting an article: "Scientists hope to adapt this technology to the obvious sector; creepy sounding robots."

  2. Jesus by hernyo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did Jesus use the same technology?

    1. Re:Jesus by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, that was Mecha-Jesus.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:Jesus by Kranfer · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a jew, I am forced to say yes... along with his Jedi powers of turning water into wine and healing as well. ::smirks::

      --
      -- Josh
      "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    3. Re:Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He didn't exist.

    4. Re:Jesus by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that these are talents jews have, including yourself and Jesus? Cool! By converting to judaism, can others get these talents, or does it only pass from the mother? Right now all I can do is turn wine into water. That's what I love about diversity: you get to learn all sorts of interesting things about other cultures and races. I wonder what other powers people are keeping secret...

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    5. Re:Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo, sir. Bravo.

    6. Re:Jesus by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No, but politicians often use this technology to avoid submersion in their own bullshit.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Jesus by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Actually, we can't do any of that. The only super-power Jews possess is that of irrational self-criticism.

    8. Re:Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a jew, I would expect you would have been smarter then this. You mean "than this", my feeble gentile.
    9. Re:Jesus by Kranfer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I do keep hollywood in mind. Since Jesus used this technology, I now expect a "When Jesus Attacks" to be put on the air, since there is currently a writers strike. Boards below the water is so low tech... a Mech Warrior Jesus Christ is much more interesting to be made into a movie...

      --
      -- Josh
      "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    10. Re:Jesus by Abreu · · Score: 1

      By converting to judaism, can others get these talents, or does it only pass from the mother? I think the prerequisites for that prestige class are a lot more strict... Besides the (racial?) requirements, you probably need some divine feats... not to mention the strict alignment restrictions...

      All in all, you are better off taking a few levels of sorcerer...
      --
      No sig for the moment.
    11. Re:Jesus by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the SciFi channel exclusive: JeSquito vs MaPyton!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:Jesus by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      But, but, Mel Brooks said that one in ten Jews is really funny.

      (love the GOV coat)

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    13. Re:Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Jewish friend calls this his Jewish magic...

    14. Re:Jesus by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      One in ten isn't really much of a people-wide ability (though it is true, and some families have more Funny Jews than others).

      BTW, what's a GOV coat?

    15. Re:Jesus by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      As a jew, I am forced to say yes... along with his Jedi powers of turning water into wine and healing as well. ::smirks::

      Last I checked, Jesus was Jewish...

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    16. Re:Jesus by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Blazing Saddles, Mel Brooks (playing the governor) wears a coat with GOV on the back. In Hebrew, Gov mean back. Funniest thing I've ever seen.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    17. Re:Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because the Jewish prophet Moses speaking to an inflamed privet is MUCH less ridiculous.

    18. Re:Jesus by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Lol, that reminded me of a George Carlin sketch, in which, while narrating Jesus, he describes one of his diciples who got jealous and tried to invent some water walking shoes, with hillarious results.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    19. Re:Jesus by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Last I checked, Jesus was Jewish..."

      What? You actually walked up to him asked him to 'whip it out' and verified his circumcision?

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    20. Re:Jesus by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Slashdot needs a "+1 Troll" besides the "-1 Troll" mod. For posts like yours. Applause.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    21. Re:Jesus by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      As a jew, I am forced to say yes... along with his Jedi powers of turning water into wine and healing as well. ::smirks::

      Last I checked, Jesus was Jewish...


      I think his point is that as a Jew, implying that Jesus' miracles were "mind-tricks" at best and total BS at worst beats the alternative that they actually killed the Messiah.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    22. Re:Jesus by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but Jesus was a level 4 druid: http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/SRD:Druid_Spell_List

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    23. Re:Jesus by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Blasphemer! That would be UltraJesus!

    24. Re:Jesus by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      What? You actually walked up to him asked him to 'whip it out' and verified his circumcision?

      Naw - my time machine is out for repair. I just read the bible instead.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    25. Re:Jesus by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think his point is that as a Jew, implying that Jesus' miracles were "mind-tricks" at best and total BS at worst beats the alternative that they actually killed the Messiah.

      Sorry for the totally off topic post but that kinda drives me crazy when Christians blame the Jews for killing Jesus. Of course they killed him because they were ALL Jewish - including Jesus. The Jewish leaders had him killed for sacrelige, very much like the Christian leaders in the dark ages had fellow Christians killed for similar reasons.

      Not saying you are saying this but when Christians blame the Jews for killing Christ as some sort of conspiracy against the Christians, they are completely forgetting that the religion known as Christianity did not come until long after Jesus was dead. In his time and shortly after, it was simply a sect variation of Judaism.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    26. Re:Jesus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the reason people say the jews killed the messiah is not to really pass blame, but to say that they should have known better considering Daniel's prophecy at Daniel 9:25,26 which says that from the going forth of the command to rebuild and restore jerusalem until the messiah would be 7 and 62 weeks. No messiah appeared after 69 literal weeks, so the jews knew it would mean 69 weeks of years, a day for a year. That's why the accounts of jesus' life said the jews were in expectation of the messiah appearing at the time ...

      There is no other prophetic timing in the Bible set as a precedent. We only know of literal time and a day for a year . . . that being the case, it's a bit too late to look for another messiah now. And even if he does come, he'll still have to die. Daniel 9:24 clearly states that at the end of the 62 weeks, the messaiah would be cut of. Isaiah 53 states that the twig of jesse would be despised and killed as well ...

      So that being said, many think the jews of the 1st century, not modern day jews, should have known better for prophetic reasons. I'm not saying either that modern christianity is what jesus intended either ...

  3. Grammar!!! by dsginter · · Score: 4, Funny

    If nothing less, you need to see the picture: it was awesome.

    There. Fixed that for you.

    --
    More
    1. Re:Grammar!!! by PlatyPaul · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, if you don't mind the sources, check out this alternate coverage (with pictures):

      Telegraph.co.uk article
      ENN article

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    2. Re:Grammar!!! by chaoticgeek · · Score: 1

      this is not all that cool looking IMO... I was expecting to see a lil robot jumping from the surface of water.

      --
      hello
    3. Re:Grammar!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: yes I understand the site is slashdotted.

      However, isn't "it's" an accepted contraction for both "it is" and "it was?"

      </rain>

    4. Re:Grammar!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There. Fixed that for you. Your grammatical prowess astounds me, especially when you are dissing someone with a purely succinct sentence like "There."

      Furthermore, there is a huge difference between "I am cool" vs "I was cool". Just as there is a difference between "It is awesome" and "It was awesome". Are you implying that it is no longer awesome? Learn English dude.
    5. Re:Grammar!!! by inaneframe · · Score: 1

      The conjunction in "it's awesome" does not have to be "it IS awesome", it can just as well be "it WAS awesome." There ya go.

      --
      "Creationists make it sound as though a 'theory' is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night." -Asimov
  4. I for one... by Bazman · · Score: 4, Funny

    welcome our new water-walking robotic overlords... with some surface-tension reducing soap :) Muahahahahahah!

    1. Re:I for one... by dsginter · · Score: 4, Informative

      with some surface-tension reducing soap

      I'm gonna take a guess to say that you learned this from Mr. Wizard?

      I remember this episode well - it is a simple but very awe-inspiring (at least from a geek's perspective) experiment. It goes like this:

            1) Fill a cookie tray with water
            2) Pepper the top of the water in order to *see* the movements of the surface tension
            3) Carefully place a small amount of soap in the center of the tray
            4) Watch the pepper scatter to the edges of the pan as the tension breaks

      If you have a kid, then you need to go do this experiment with them NOW!

      RIP Don Herbert - you are one of the main reasons that I am a geek today.

      --
      More
    2. Re:I for one... by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

      IIRC, he used lycopodium powder on the surface. Not quite sure why that stuck in my brain for the last 20 years.

      And yes, I think a lot of us owe our geekness to Mr Wizard. Off the top of my head, I remember the water displacement in the blue barrel with the kid who was freezing, the snow melting in the microwave, the telescope, the papercutting and jumping through it, the illusion of fading into a skeleton, and one of those shorts in it where they heated the pebbles to provide better traction on ice.

    3. Re:I for one... by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      Alternate experiment:

      Create a "boat" out of aluminum foil. Shape it like a square with a triangle appended to one edge, and fold slightly. Cut a small slit on the back of it (opposite the point), and place carefully on the surface of the pan filled with water. Carefully place a small drop of dish soap onto the slit, and watch the surface tension propel your boat forward!

    4. Re:I for one... by SQLGuru · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry....all of my foil is being used to make hats.

    5. Re:I for one... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Whew. I thought you were going to say that you put a water strider on a pan of water and then sank it. I was all ready to call PETA, make popcorn and watch the fun.

    6. Re:I for one... by PolarBearFire · · Score: 1

      Paper works just as well in this experiment. Used to do it all the time when I do the dishes.

    7. Re:I for one... by ahsile · · Score: 1

      The one that always stuck with me was the water pressure/pump experiment. Trying to pull water up as many stories as you could with a giant straw!

    8. Re:I for one... by ahsile · · Score: 1

      Er, atmospheric pressure.... not water pressure.

    9. Re:I for one... by RpiMatty · · Score: 1

      I learned this one in high school.
      Take a small pitri dish or something similar and fill with milk.
      Place drops of several colors of food coloring in different areas.
      Place a drop or 2 of dishsoap in the middle.
      Watch the colors swirl all around as the soap reduces the surface tension.

    10. Re:I for one... by dstiggy · · Score: 2, Funny

      1) Fill a cookie tray with water
      2) Pepper the top of the water in order to *see* the movements of the surface tension
      3) Carefully place a small amount of soap in the center of the tray
      4) Watch the pepper scatter to the edges of the pan as the tension breaks
      5)???
      6)Profit!!!

      fixed that for you
    11. Re:I for one... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      I see a sudden spike in the sales of PhotoFlow(tm) in the near future. Especially among paranoid organized crime syndicates who happen to be next to lakes.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    12. Re:I for one... by raddan · · Score: 1

      I personally learned this one from my photo tech class in high school (do they still have that class anymore?). There was a chemical that we dipped our developed and fixed film in to prevent water spots from forming on them as they dried. Water just ran right off onto the floor. My teacher casually brought up soap when explaining how this works. Ah, soap! I knew it had a use ;^)

    13. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you don't mean gravity? Would the experiment not work in a vacuum with gravity?

    14. Re:I for one... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, he used lycopodium powder on the surface. Not quite sure why that stuck in my brain for the last 20 years. I know why it is stuck in mine: he used it in several experiments, both with water and also to simulate a grain mill explosion. And I'd watched the same episodes repeat countless times on Nickelodeon back when it didn't have commercials other than for shows on the network (listing air times in four timezones).

      I don't recall him ever using the word "hydrophobic", but I think he did say "meniscus" once.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    15. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Photo-Flo is what the stuff is called.

  5. Move along, nothing to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...already Slashdotted

    1. Re:Move along, nothing to see here... by LameAssTheMity · · Score: 1

      WTS Google Cache

      Seriously, are you new here?

    2. Re:Move along, nothing to see here... by Antity-H · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm the text-only version is recommended since the images are loaded from the original site which is undergoing a nuclear meltdown right now.

      http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/?p=592&strip=1

    3. Re:Move along, nothing to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/12/07/sciwater107.xml

      Different article, linked from the original. This one has a video and isn't so slashdotted. Yet.

  6. My Life IS RUINED! by explosivejared · · Score: 3, Funny

    All my life I've been waiting to see an awesome picture about FRIKKIN ROBOTS THAT BOUNCE on water, and now it's apparently slashdotted! I'm gonna cry now.

    P.S. Hey taco if this is just some sick joke, and you gave a busted url, I'll kill you! Robots on water... you don't play around with that!

    --
    I got a catholic block.
    1. Re:My Life IS RUINED! by ookabooka · · Score: 5, Informative

      See, my life just got better because I have a great excuse to karma whore. Yay nyud mirror

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    2. Re:My Life IS RUINED! by sammydee · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it just make so much more sense if all slashdot links used the coral cache?

      Or would that just ruin the fun?

    3. Re:My Life IS RUINED! by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it just make so much more sense if all slashdot links used the coral cache?

      No! Please don't...

      Some of us are "working," and can only access pages on ports 80 or 443 due to the corporate firewall. Coral cache is useless to us.

    4. Re:My Life IS RUINED! by Sitelutions · · Score: 2, Informative

      We're working on it - it should be responsive now. After a few friendly suggestions, they've installed WP-Cache on their site, and they've also been advised to submit static HTML pages in links to /. and Digg, or use Coral Cache.

      - Sitelutions Team

  7. Mirror Please by module0000 · · Score: 1

    Site is being destroyed by /. - give us a mirror!

    --
    Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Mirror Please by ookabooka · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No problemo bud, here is a google cache (I posted a different mirror this time, so it's not redundant)

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
  8. The Picture Might Be Worth It... by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But I believe we've had a theory for this for awhile now. In August of 2003, MIT published some information on the subject. Here's a link:

    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2003/robostrider.html

    Here's some relevant content from that link:

    MIT researchers report in the Aug. 7 issue of Nature that they now understand how the insects known as water striders skim effortlessly across the surface of ponds and oceans.

    And:

    Using mathematics, high-speed photography and a variety of flow visualization techniques, Bush, mathematics graduate student David L. Hu and mechanical engineering graduate student Brian Chan uncovered the true way in which water striders walk on water.

    As the insect rests on the surface, the tips of its thin legs create miniscule valleys. It sculls the middle set of its three pairs of legs like oars, causing the water behind those legs to propel it forward as the surface of the valley rebounds like a trampoline. Although the rowing motion does create tiny waves, "the waves do not play a significant role in the momentum transfer necessary for propulsion," the researchers wrote. "The momentum transfer is primarily in the form of subsurface vortices."

    1. Re:The Picture Might Be Worth It... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's how they walk on water. This is how they jump.

    2. Re:The Picture Might Be Worth It... by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      Oh! Gotcha. Unfortunately, I'm still trying to get the article to load, and I must have misread the summary.

      Thanks.

    3. Re:The Picture Might Be Worth It... by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Article Content (even Google cache is REALLY slow):

      The way water striders walk on water was discovered years ago. The insect uses its long legs to help evenly distribute its tiny body weight. The weight is distributed over a large area so that the fragile skin formed by surface tension supports the bug on the water. However, the ability of water striders to jump onto water without sinking has baffled scientists, until now.

      A team of researchers at Seoul National University, led by Ho-Young Kim and Duck-Gyu Lee, has finally answered that question. By using a highly water-repellent sphere, which mimicked the actions of the water strider's highly water-repellent legs, they were able to determine a small range of speeds at which the sphere or insect could hit the water and not sink.

      If the sphere hit too fast, it would shoot through the surface of the water. If it hit too slow, it would not bounce back and sink. The water strider is one of the fastest moving insects in the world. It can travel up to 100 times the length of its body in one second, equivalent to around 400 mph in human terms.

      Scientists hope to adapt this technology to the obvious sector; creepy sounding robots. One team at Carnegie Mellon University has already developed a small spider robot that can walk on water like the strider.

      The Korean scientists believe their discovery will help create robots that can travel over still bodies of water. They say the robots can be used to explore or monitor water quality. Also they could, and it's highly likely that they will, be used as a form of spy robot.

      While this is all well and good, and a touch unnerving since it reminds me of several scary sci-fi books, I'll be a lot more interested when they invent something that allows humans to walk on water this quickly.

    4. Re:The Picture Might Be Worth It... by tonsberg · · Score: 1

      A team of researchers at Seoul National University, led by Ho-Young Kim and Duck-Gyu Lee, has finally answered that question. By using a highly water-repellent sphere, which mimicked the actions of the water strider's highly water-repellent legs, they were able to determine a small range of speeds at which the sphere or insect could hit the water and not sink.

      This does remind me of the cutting-edge technology developed in Britain say, oh, 65 years ago? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouncing_bomb
      Good to know they've finally miniaturized it. =)
    5. Re:The Picture Might Be Worth It... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Yes, as the summary stated, how they walk on water was discovered a while ago. How they get onto the water from land without breaking the surface tension was what this new research was about.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    6. Re:The Picture Might Be Worth It... by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      Yes, this was pointed out a few hours ago, and I responded. Feel free to check the thread. You know, RTFT? ;)

  9. Rather short on information... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I managed to view the site before it went down in flames under the slashdot effect. The picture was cool, but the article left much to be desired:

    How big is the robot?
    How much does it weigh?
    How fast can it move?
    How is it controlled?
    What is the range of speeds for this that was mentioned in the article?
    They mentioned applying it to sampling water quality, but wouldn't that disrupt the surface tension to sample the water right under the robot?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Rather short on information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You left out the most important question of all:

      Does it give you 30 seconds to comply?

    2. Re:Rather short on information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on /. would a comment filled with questions be moderated +Informative.

  10. Great by gowakuwa · · Score: 2, Funny

    So Jesus was an insectoid alien or an intergalactic robot? Either way it had to be hard to intelligently design him, or her.

    1. Re:Great by damaki · · Score: 1
      --
      Stupidity is the root of all evil.
  11. Baffles science? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here's a related link: http://www.livescience.com/animals/041103_water_strider.html

    This one is erroneous in at least one way. It suggests that tiny bubbles trapped in hairs on the bug's legs make it float. Tosh! The bubbles are too small to make it boyant. What the bubbles do is increase the surface area which, in turn, increases the amount of surface tension "skin" that the bug walks on and therefore the carrying capacity.

    As most fly fishermen would tell you, surface tension is far stronger than you'd think. Hatching bugs struggle to get through the surface tension which keeps them under the surface. Once they break through they are able to sit and walk quite easily.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Baffles science? by adagioforstrings · · Score: 1

      According to the article it is the "jumping onto water without sinking" which was baffling, not the walking part, which, as you pointed out, has been understood for some time.

  12. Fantastic! by east+coast · · Score: 1

    If nothing less, you need to see the picture: it's awesome.

    If you're one of the four people who got to see the picture before it became Slashdotted....

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  13. Old News? by KJACK98 · · Score: 1

    The original article link is down, so can't tell if its old news, but I remember reading a similar article on slashdot earlier about the 'baffling' mystery of water striders being solved?

    MIT Robot Walks On Water
    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/26/0141229/

  14. Slashdotted! by whtmarker · · Score: 1

    Here is the cached image.

  15. Slashdot Repellent by richdun · · Score: 1

    Here's the Telegraph story linked in the blog entry we just hosed:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/12/07/sciwater107.xml

    Yes, it's dated July 12, 2007. Yes, you must be new here.

    1. Re:Slashdot Repellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that in Europe it's read as December 7.

    2. Re:Slashdot Repellent by richdun · · Score: 1

      Doh! That's what I get for posting when I should be studying for finals.

  16. Never, ever, EVER do that! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 5, Funny
    If nothing less, you need to see the picture: it's awesome.

    Never put a line like this in a /. summary. Do you want Congress to pass a law classifying /. as some kind of cyber-terror weapon? You can almost see smoke coming out of the ground around these poor bastards' data center.

    1. Re:Never, ever, EVER do that! by Sitelutions · · Score: 1

      The traffic isn't that bad. We just had to talk to them a bit about caches and linking directly to dynamic pages. We also temporarily raised the caps on their virtual server and adjusted the Apache configuration for this type of traffic.

      -Sitelutions Team

    2. Re:Never, ever, EVER do that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How nice of you to create a slashdot account just so you could tell us how wonderful you are.

    3. Re:Never, ever, EVER do that! by Sitelutions · · Score: 1

      Well, we're keeping an eye on things. Would you rather work with a host who lets things run into the ground?

    4. Re:Never, ever, EVER do that! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

      I applaud your attention and help to your customer(s). I would most certainly prefer to work with someone who can help deal with surges, DDOS, rootkits, and the many other problems that plague web sites. My hat is off to you.

    5. Re:Never, ever, EVER do that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Would you rather work with a host who lets things run into the ground?

      I'd rather work with one who doesn't employ logical fallacies, for one. Your reply makes no sense.

  17. building a vessel that floats on almost any thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which is likely what we'll be coming across, as opposed to water, the way things are going. will the 'robots' be able to 'bounce' on acidic goop?

    corepirate nazi execrable costs outweigh benefits
    (Score:-)mynuts won, the king is a fink)
    by ourselves on everyday 24/7

    as there are no benefits, just more&more death/debt & disruption.

    fortunately there's an 'army' of light bringers, coming yOUR way

    do not be afraid/dismayed, it is the way it was meant to be.

    the little ones/innocents must/will be protected.

    after the big flash, ALL of yOUR imaginary 'borders' may blur a bit?

    for each of the creators' innocents harmed (in any way), there is a debt that must/will be repaid by you/us, as the perpetrators/minions of unprecedented evile, will not be available.

    all is not lost/forgotten/forgiven.

    no need to fret (unless you're associated/joined at the hype with, unprecedented evile), it's all just a part of the creators' wwwildly popular, newclear powered, planet/population rescue initiative/mandate.

    or, is it (literally) ground hog (as in dead meat) day, again? many of US are obviously not interested in/aware of how we appear (which is whoreabull) from the other side of the 'lens', or even from across the oceans.

    vote with (what's left in) yOUR wallet. help bring an end to unprecedented evile's manifestation through yOUR owned felonious corepirate nazi glowbull warmongering execrable.

    some of US should consider ourselves very fortunate to be among those scheduled to survive after the big flash/implementation of the creators' wwwildly popular planet/population rescue initiative/mandate.

    it's right in the manual, 'world without end', etc....

    as we all ?know?, change is inevitable, & denying/ignoring gravity, logic, morality, etc..., is only possible, on a temporary basis.

    concern about the course of events that will occur should the life0cidal execrable fail to be intervened upon is in order.

    'do not be dismayed' (also from the manual). however, it's ok/recommended, to not attempt to live under/accept, fauxking nazi felon greed/fear/ego based pr ?firm? scriptdead mindphuking hypenosys.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creators. providing more than enough of everything for everyone (without any distracting/spiritdead personal gain motives), whilst badtolling unprecedented evile, using an unlimited supply of newclear power, since/until forever. see you there?

    "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."

  18. The picture is mirrored here by module0000 · · Score: 1
    --
    Trackball users will be first against the wall.
  19. Tying 2 slashdot stories together by roguegramma · · Score: 1

    Congrats you just violated the copyright on that image and made your PC subject to random $eizure and $elling off http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/10/1522241.

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB
    1. Re:Tying 2 slashdot stories together by whtmarker · · Score: 1

      I copied the image from google cache to google blogger. I wasn't aware google cache held the copyright on all of the images it caches.

  20. This will fail to be commercially deployed. by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 1

    (*) It will be fought by entrenched fishing interests

  21. This is a crock of shit by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is not science. This is bullshit.

    The "robot" spreads its weight out using the whole length of its legs in contact with the water. That is nothing like a water strider.

    A water strider walks on the **ends** of its legs (feet, if you will). For a far better description see http://www.livescience.com/animals/041103_water_strider.html.

    The only similarity is that they both use surface tension.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:This is a crock of shit by PolarBearFire · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have trouble disagreeing with you. I looked at the pic expecting a robot analog of a water strider. Instead it was really disappointing. You can get the same exact effect using a common paper clip on a cup of water! Maybe I can attach a small motor to it and call it a water bouncing robot. I got to tell you man, these scientists are seriously making the 21st century suck.

    2. Re:This is a crock of shit by dotancohen · · Score: 0

      It's science for the headlines. NASA pioneered it by sending humans where robots should go, albeit at a time when it was appropriate (space race). Remember these assholes? Making up 2.5 meter scorpions from a 46 centimeter claw. Assuming the claw-body ratio of modern scorpions, that would still make for an impressive 1.75 meter scorpion. But no, these idiots had to exaggerate, to break records. Science is being perverted. Bah.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:This is a crock of shit by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is not science. This is bullshit.

      Of course it's fucking science, even if it isn't exactly what you hoped it would be. What makes this "not science"?!

      The "robot" spreads its weight out using the whole length of its legs in contact with the water. That is nothing like a water strider.

      So? So our robots aren't nearly as light as a water strider (I guarantee you the robot pictured weights a lot more than 15x a water strider), and require much greater surface area to stay afloat. Also we can't create legs with the tiny micro-hairs that allow the strider to stay afloat and jump on water so easily. What do you know, nature still wins, and we still have a lot of work to do to duplicate it.

      If that's the standard, pretty much all science is bullshit.

      The only similarity is that they both use surface tension.

      Well according to your link water striders don't even rely on surface tension.

      Nevertheless: Water-walking robot. Some people would think that's cool. But that would be those of us who appreciate advancements in the state of the art, not those who think anything less than the end goal is a 'crock of shit'.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:This is a crock of shit by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      The "robot" spreads its weight out using the whole length of its legs in contact with the water. That is nothing like a water strider. The real strider does a quite similar thing with a length of its leg horizontal to the water. I can't fathom how you think this is nothing like that. It just has a higher percent of the leg horizontal in contact with the water because the body of the robot weighs more and the legs need to support more weight.
    5. Re:This is a crock of shit by MorpheousMarty · · Score: 1
      Oh god I'm kicking myself for typing this but the geek in me won't let go. From the article the grandparent linked to

      The insect dances up and down to avoid being submerged by raindrops, and it can pack 15 times its body weight without sinking. So if the robot is 15x the weight of a strider, they might as well just take off the legs and put the rest on a real strider.
    6. Re:This is a crock of shit by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So if the robot is 15x the weight of a strider, they might as well just take off the legs and put the rest on a real strider.

      Yeah, that's why I said the robot clearly weights a lot more than 15x a water strider. Look at it, it's a block of metal. It's much more dense and vastly larger than a water strider -- not surprising given the state of robotics. There's no possible way a water strider could hold up that robotic body, it's not even within an order of magnitude of being capable.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  22. Mirror / Additional Content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Coral Cache seems to have a mirror of the image.
    http://aycu05.webshots.com.nyud.net:8090/image/34684/2000802596361707173_rs.jpg

    The article also links to this one, which has a different water walking robot overlord picture.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/12/07/sciwater107.xml

  23. Link not working. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Anyone got a mirror for the mirror?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Link not working. by wizardforce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anyone got a mirror for the mirror?
      here's your mirror mirror
      http://www.enn.com/sci-tech/article/26913
      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  24. Water Striders... by homgran · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember going to a conference presentation by John Bush back in 2005 which detailed the physics behind water striders. His presentation was very good, and the video footage he presented was absolutely fantastic (see here and here). I think the work referenced in the main article isn't quite as groundbreaking as they'd have you believe. There has been quite a lot of work in this area over the last five years.

    1. Re:Water Striders... by JWedg · · Score: 1

      At the first link, he puts dye into the water and photographs the striders from below showing the vortices they create when they move. Beautiful! You MUST check them out. And the vids at the 2nd link are interesting though not quite what I'd hoped for. Still, worth a look.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    2. Re:Water Striders... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, not only did they censor the pictures of the mating water striders, but they hid their faces to protect their identities too! I'm glad to see some researches take privacy concerns seriously.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  25. hah by jovius · · Score: 1

    Oh, the laughter of the water striders... see you in a million years, suckers!

  26. slashdotted by Mini-Geek · · Score: 1

    I got through, and uploaded it to imageshack in case it goes down again or I was just lucky in getting through.
    http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6365/slashdottedqf9.jpg

    --
    do {print "Mini-Geek Rules!\n";}
    until ($TheEndOfTheWorld);
  27. Re: I wasn't aware google cache held the copyright by roguegramma · · Score: 1

    Well, google cache doesn't hold the copyright.

    While the cache excuse might work, it also means the cache has to stop distribution whenever the original site wishes to end distribution (exercising their rights).

    This is bad especially for the wayback machine since right now they operate in a legal hole (not a loophole at all).

    IMHO IANAL INSOTSC

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB
  28. Re:Forget the mirror.. Use the source! by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

    I hunted for the video. In my search I came upon the original site, not the article talking about the site.

    http://nanolab.me.cmu.edu/projects/waterstrider/

    Here is the actual project including how it works (Pizo) photos of both prototypes, the light and dark one, and detail on the robotics in it.
    It includes 3 videos including the walking on water video.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. oblig. Futurama by owlnation · · Score: 1

    well, bounce my shiny metal ass

    1. Re:oblig. Futurama by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      Say, you heard that on TV!

      Actually, this is a far cry from bouncing a Slinky down the stairs...

  31. So how do the striders do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how they control the the speed at which they hit the water? Wings? Do they use their legs as shock absorbers?

  32. Bigger version of the "awesome" picture by SiliconEntity · · Score: 3, Informative

    That picture is not actually from the new research, it is from old work at Carnegie-Mellon. Here is a bigger version:

    http://nanolab.me.cmu.edu/projects/waterstrider/STRIDE_water_strider_big.jpg

    It is part of the work of the NanoRobotics Labaratory at CMU.

  33. Doesn't seem economical by stonefry · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a little boat be just as efficient (if not more) without all of the robot research.

  34. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0, Troll

    MOD PARENT UP!!! It is NOT a troll. Disgusting moderation system.

    I suppose Slashdot editors have played video games instead of learning how the world works. Live in a fantasy world, throw away your life.

  35. Mitochondrial DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those powers are passed down from the mother via midichlorian DNA.

  36. Speculation, speculation by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Of all the so-called sciences, paleontology has to be the most contrived.

    Modern scorpions do not have a fixed claw-to-body ratio. Non-poisonous scorpions tend to have larger more powerful claws, sometimes by a factor of 3 or more. Using modern claw to body ratios would give a size of somewhere between approx 1.5 and 5 metres. Of course that assumes that claw-to-body ratios have been constant over time.

    One just needs to look at the fiddler crab to see how stupid it is to make claw-to-body comparisons and such assumptions. The fiddler crab has two different size claws, one approximately the width of the crab and the smaller one approx 20% the width of the crab.

    Still, the giant scorpion is far less contrived than many paneontological "discoveries". You often see beautifully detailed drawings and descriptions of animals with the only physical evidence being a tooth fragment.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Speculation, speculation by dotancohen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Really, it's that bad. It's not only in science, I see bullshit super-accurate results where the data is so foggy that it makes me angry. Case in point: last week I told the wife to pull over so that we could fill up. The needle was buried below E and the gas light was on. She said "not now, there's another 62 kilometers in there". The computer has a kilometer-to-empty feature. You know how that bad boy works? It's got a float in the gas tank on an arm connected to a potentiometer. Even assuming that the gas level stayed perfectly level, and the arm did not move with the vehicle movement, and the potentiometer was 90% accurate, and the driving conditions were constant and always have been, I doubt that the thing could be accurate to +-10 kilometer. The engineers had real nerve trying to imply accuracy to the kilometer. That, or there's a 2.5 meter scorpion working at Ford.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  37. wow by 40ozFreak · · Score: 1

    That picture is really bad ass. It's a shame that everything cool, technologically speaking, automatically has a military purpose for spying.

  38. Almost Complete by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is worm-like robots that burrow through the earth. And of course earwhig robots that burrow into your ear, and tick robots that attach to your skin and suck your blood. Cock roach robots won't need to do anything except run around and freak people out because they're so icky. Then, without a shot being fired, hasta la vista Sarah Conner.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  39. the icon image from the address line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The little address line icon is a pot leaf at that site. So maybe that is how it walks on water, it just gets a little elevated.

  40. Yeah, but ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... can they carry lasers?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  41. Other Planets! by sckeener · · Score: 1

    Come on! The first thing I thought of was 'cool! we can do Rover's on Europe or Titan where we have liquid gas!

    I see more use for this in space than here. A spy robot that walks on liquid? I'd love to see pictures from Titan where it walks out over the liquid air.

    And I'd have to say that such a robot would be a true all terrain robot...it could zip around the coast lines looking for life.

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  42. Duck-Gyu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A team of researchers at Seoul National University, led by Ho-Young Kim and Duck-Gyu Lee...
    Am I the only insensitive clod who read the names of the research team leaders and thought "Well, Duck Gyu too!"
  43. Woo Hoo!!! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Wait 'til I get this out on the 'hooch!

    Hey y'all! Watch this!

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  44. water repellant material from oak ridge by Darth+Cider · · Score: 1

    Last week, Oak Ridge announced development of a material that is virtually unwettable, a nanoetched powder that acts on surface tension and can be applied as a coating to almost any surface. A boat with a coated hull would become a water strider - one continuous stride. Much cooler news than this article.

  45. Jesus Cyborg (batteries not included) by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 2, Funny
    Some how I think this robot will be marketed for evangelical purposes. And for that reason IT MUST BE DESTROYED!

    *In the voice of that BS Billy Graham book advert*
    Have you ever wondered why God never allowed for you to have the rich fullfilling life you think deserve? Are you tired of waiting for the rapture for God to smite democrats, Catholics, Muslims, people who hate George Bush, teachers who teach Darwinism, the Internet, and everyone else except for you and all your elitist God-fearing friends?
    Introducing the Billy Graham Jesus Cyborg.
    The Jesus Cyborg has been programmed using Bible technology by scientist who reject Darwinism and embrace Kirk Cameron's Banana ideology. Impress your friends. Forcible convert non-believers to your beliefs. Had enough with UN diplomacy? Send it to the Middle East to blow up Israeli-hating hethens! Use it to protest homosexuality at military funerals. Wherever your need to assert your crazy fundamental religious ideologies, or find the TV remote to watch Fox News, the Jesus Cyborg is there with the good book in one hand, a metal claw in the other, and a 12 gauge shotgun strapped to it back. Best of all It "walks" on water!. You can have your very own Jesus Cyborg for an annual donation to the Crystal Cathedral of $1000

    Warning! The Jesus Cyborg may have grand dillutions of what faith is. Keep indoors at all time and do not let it out side for any reason. Children should be supervised when using Jesus Cyborg as should small animals and the invalid. Jesus Cyborg runs on a combination of batteries and old peoples medication. Jesus Cyborg will generally try to escape the house once a month and try to solicit religious propoganda to the neighbors. If he escapes, contact them immediately and tell them to turn off all the lights. Made in China, so beware of lead paint.
    There is only one question I have for this robot: Would Jesus Cyborg wear a Rolex on His Television Show?
    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  46. Seems pointless by DeeQ · · Score: 1

    The real question, can it water ski?