Dell's Linux, IT Re-Invention
jcatcw writes "An IDG analysis of Dell's attempts to reinvent itself concludes that there are some positive results, but there are problems with the company's supply-chain management and support. One area analysts want to see more improvement: the company's Linux business. 'Jeremy Cole, owner of Proven Scaling, a small consulting firm with offices in the US and UK ... is satisfied with Dell equipment, but said the company needs to show more support for open-source applications and the Linux OS. "It's clear that Dell cares about Linux, in that all their server-class hardware is well-supported by the Linux kernel and they have many people dedicated to making sure that's the case. However, it's not good enough just to boot," Cole said.'"
I buy a lot of computers for work. I work at a charity that has a nifty agreement with Dell that could save me a ton of money. But I stopped buying Dell computers a few years back because I could not get a consistent product from them. I would buy 10 identical computers, open them up and find a zillion different parts from a zillion manufacturers in them. This drives me crazy. I heard tell that Dell was addressing this, but haven't followed up. I switched to Acer a few years back. If Dell wants to sell me computers again they need A. a guarantee that the sub-contracted bits inside are of a consistent quality, and B. a non-Vista option.
Mediocre quality, slow delivery, piss poor service and support...What's not to like?
If you buy a lot of computers and deal with multiple retailers, the contrast can't help but leap out at you. HP, from being craptacular last decade, has done a much better job of "reinventing" themselves than Dell has. Middleman retailers like CDW are fricking lightning fast, and they're really easy to deal with, especially when buying volume.
Contrast this with Dell...I work for a national corporation that does millions of dollars a year in business with Dell...Or used to. We had representatives in corporate who were in direct contact with high-powered Dell salespeople. Did it expedite anything? No. We have top tier support, does it stop them from sending out techs who know less than non-experts on our local staff? I had to help some dumbass fix a printer once, and my printer repair technique is normally limited to bft.
I was a big Dell fan...once. I've yet to see any sign that they've done anything but continue their slide toward the low end of the market.
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
The whole article on one page.
"I've spent my whole life figuring out crazy ways to do things. It'll work." -- Montgomery Scott, "Relics"
No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
What is clear is that people are not happy will Dell's support for desktop deployments and smaller customers. But these are not the area that Dell is interested in. The article and many others show that Dell support for their Linux SERVER products is good. Why would a reasonable person expect Dell to support uses like Desktop and small business when that is not their Linux focus? Dell does not sell Linux for the hobby or home user, it's not realistic to expect them to support these segments of customer.
If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
We have a company that was successful when the founder was running then foundered under his replacement. Now the founder returns and is righting the ship. Who would have thought that Dell would follow Apple's business model?
It's just that the interim weenie was out for profit at all costs. Profit at all costs makes you a lot of money, initially, but one of the costs is your customer base.
It's going to take them a long time to win back the people who they alienated.
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
We've used Dell gear in my last couple of jobs. We had some stupid level of support on our Latitudes at my last job and they'd send people out to replace the hard drives and little rubber feet and everything, which was sort of nice but still annoying to take care of. We use a ton of Dell servers at my new job and at least on the hard drive failures I've seen so far Dell support has been really good at overnighting new drive right out. However, I've always been frustrated by the support levels in the same way as Microsoft licensing. There are too many options, and these options all have different numbers you have to call. Sometimes when I use the online chat support, which is much nicer than sitting on the phone, they kick me away to phone support if I start asking two many Poweredge questions. For Poweredge and linux support I highly recommend their linux-poweredge mailing list. They've got at least a few of their dedicated linux engineers on there but there's good community support as well. Sometimes searching here directly with Google brings back results that you wouldn't have found using the entire intarweb. I'm really pushing for more debian and 64bit support as are many others. OMSA is a beast though. Mebbe IPMI will save the day.
It's clear that Dell cares about Linux, in that all their server-class hardware is well-supported by the Linux kernel and they have many people dedicated to making sure that's the case. However, it's not good enough just to boot,
Ding! On the server side:
Don't get me started on what pieces of shit the "PERC" raid controllers (made by LSI) are...
We use Dell servers and workstation here at work exclusively and never had an issue with them. We have their Gold support and if something goes wrong, within 4 hours a replacement is here. Tech support for the servers has been top notch. But when it comes to home products they are seriously flawed as my little blog post states. How a company can ship over two thousand dollars worth of hardware to me but won't send me a 200 dollar camcorder because they can't verify who I am is beyond comprehension.
However, over the past few years I've been seeing an increase in the number of quality control issues on their PC boxes. Probably from cutting corners in the cost. Something similar happened to Gateway and Packard Bell back in the day. Also, the fact when people called tech support they got someone who barely spoke english and answered questions from a script further served to alienate users.
This time last year I was working on a project for a small mom & pop medical supply company. It was coming time for a new round of Medicare and state certifications, plus the owners were getting ready to sell the company and retire after running it for 25 years and their 15 year old computers running DOS wasn't going to make the cut. Especially when trying to sell the company. (Hey if you buy it, the first thing you have to do is buy $25k in hardware and software (mostly software).
Their software vendor was still in business. They recommended going with Dell (They had some sort of deal with them plus had stated they were able to get support from Dell as opposed to HP or other vendors with their product lines). However, the company was also very upfront with the fact that their software WOULD NOT work on Vista.
I kept telling the business owners they needed to purchase their workstations last January before the switchover to Vista happened. I kept telling them that as soon as Vista was released, they would not be able to get a Dell PC shipped with XP Pro. And I kept getting the: "We have 30k of public aid money coming. We'll buy them when it comes in." Now this was more of a small business owner problem than a Dell problem, but nothing happened for a couple months and I got a phone call at the end of Feb (may have been early March). "We called Dell, and they said they can't(won't) ship a PC workstation with XP pro on it. It's all vista and the software won't work on Vista and probably won't for another year or more!". I was originally hired to back up their data from the DOS box and for my advise on what to do next. (Going to a hosted solution, vs. storing the data locally, which basically meant listen to the sales folks, and then tell the owners of the business my opinion.)
I was nice and checked around and Gateway was the only somewhat major vendor, ironically, that still offered machines you could order with XP pro installed. Well, they ended up buying Dell's with Vista. and eventually spending another $500 downgrading to XP Pro. And that was after 3 months of being the software vendors Vista beta test bitch (And the software vendor still charged the medical supply company $15k with no discount for the honor)
And this wasn't the first time. I also remember this happening in the transition from Windows 2k pro to XP. A lot of my clients at the time liked Windows 2K Pro and saw no major need to upgrade right away. (And I still don't blame them.)
"The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
I work for a large maker of an enterprise wide healthcare application. We sell a complete turnkey system including the hardware (servers and workstations). We used to sell Dell pro-actively as an alternative to Copmpaq/HP. We no longer do so, as we would continually run into problems with poor support, and horrible field engineers (contracted out to Unisys). In one instance, a customer lost a terabyte of data that needed to then be retrieved from tape (the filed engineer started swapping disks between cages in a RAID 0+1 enclosure). After several years of grief, we dropped Dell. If a customer insists on Dell, which som do, we no longer act on their behalf for hardware issues, as we would for an HP shop. Their support contracts cover our software only, and they are on their own as regards hardware support (including negotiating the support agreement itself). As far as I am concerned, Dell sucks, and it will take a WHOLE lot to convince me otherwise.
Since I got interviewed for the article and then quoted in the Slashdot summary, I thought I'd pipe in... I was interviewed by Agam because of my post to Dell's IdeaStorm site about the PERC 5/i RAID controller:
:)
Leverate LSI to Open Source MegaCli — Dell is using LSI's chipset (LSI MegaRAID SAS) in the PERC 5/i controller, but the tools to manage it are closed source and really suck. Vote on it NOW!
It's not for lack of talent in the Dell Linux team. I've been following the Dell Linux server list for years, having been responsible for all-Dell Linux server farms in the past, and Matt Domsch and the team there has been doing great work, considering the obstacles thrown in their way by the randomness of the hardware.
This is constantly-morphing commodity hardware, with light-outs support, RAID, and other details optimized for Windows, and a new interface randomly tossed out the door in each new server model. The hardware lands in the the Linux support group's laps after the fact, and they do they best they can, bound by the proprietariness and sometimes just plain weirdness of the hardware features.
We'll start buying Dells again when they have standalone lights-out management like Sun and HP. They are making slow progress. It's unfair to say their stuff is junk. You can get good support, if you follow their rules.
Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
There is no turn around in Dell. And there was better Linux/BSD support for Linux *before* Dell supported Linux.
We've been a Dell customer for 10 years. The first five years were pretty good. The old PowerEdge servers were pretty nice. But I've never met a Perc card I liked.
What is a Perc card? Well, it is generic term for the card that Dell happens to be rebranding at the moment.
What is rebranding? Well, take a perhaps decent card, screw with it for the sake of vendor lock-in, so that the original vendor's drivers and utilities no longer work with it, degrade its performance beyond measure without any hope of cure, and you have a Dell rebrand.
The new MD1000, while pretty nice arrays, are only officially supported if you use a Perc 5e card. This card is a true Dell rebrand of an LSI MegraRAID. It's a thousand dollar turd. There are no decent utilities (in fact all LSI megaraid utils will NOT work). They even took away some of the simple command line utilities for Linux like lsiutil, and replaced it with a huge, bloated Java application. Can you imagine that piece of bloatware as your only means of talking to your drive array? And FreeBSD support, while the FreeBSD community has made a valiant effort trying to support this piece of shit, still is not worth it. It's lackluster performance at best.
But here's the real kicker about the Perc 5e: It does not allow direct pass through. Yeah, that's right, if you get fed up with it's lame RAID 10 performance (and it is lame we've confirmed that software RAID on Linux and FreeBSD is significantly faster), you can't directly reach your drives. So if you want to implement software RAID, you have to configure independent RAID0 virtual disks in the Perc 5e BIOS. Why? so Dell can lock you in to their proprietary, rebranded, turd card. This is a wonderful new feature unique to the Perc 5 that wasn't there with Perc 4.
But, as we found out, the Perc 4 was an even bigger piece of crap. It was a rebranded Adaptec that had over a year-long history of locking up under heavy loads on Linux systems. They were selling this so-called Linux supported PowerEdge 2650 (boat anchor) for over a year knowing that it locked up under stress:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=92129
We got burned by this and it took us weeks to resolve (went through 3 Perc 4 cards with same result, and ended up putting in a LSI card).
If you need anything with real RAID support, run from Dell. We've been pretty pleased with the MD1000, but that Perc 5 card sums up Dell. Buy a 3ware or Areca instead. Who cares if Dell won't support the MD1000 if you use it, they don't support it anyway. Of all our calls to Dell enterprise support, we've talked to one person who seems to have half of a clue.
There is no such thing as Dell support. And their lame attempt at vendor lock-in only makes it worse. And that is why Dell is drowning.
We've moved to HP. And we've been really happy with our HP servers. Is HP support any better? I can't say. But we don't have near the vendor lock-in and rebranded voodoo we get from Dell.
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Steve_Ballmer
Dell recently moaned about the low uptake on its Linux PCs. I'm not surprised, considering what they were offering.
I have bought several machines from Dell over the past few years, the latest being an Inspiron 550, and have installed Linux on all of them.
Fedora 8 runs beautifully on the Inspiron 550, which is a very inexpensive machine, for which there is no option to buy with Linux installed.
So, really, Dell shouldn't complain about the low uptake on its Linux PCs but should offer more diversity of machines that come with Linux!
Linux/Open Source/Anti Microsoft News
We buy a ton of computers from Dell and HP and the one thing that really bugs me about Dell is that they give price breaks on the same models to consumers first, and then we 'premium' buyers basically have to beg them to match that price. Same models, crappier prices for their business customers. I just don't understand....do they think we can't see their banner ads all over the internet?