Slashdot Mirror


Archos 605 WiFi Hacked

Nathan Ramella writes "The ARCwelder project has released a technique dubbed 'Go Fighting Tabby!' which exploits an unquoted system() call through the Archos UI, providing the ability to execute arbitrary code with root access on the Archos 605 WiFi. In doing so, opening the platform up for further hacking. The Archos 605 WiFi runs embedded Linux on an ARM processor, but employs a variety of anti-hack techniques to keep users from modifying its firmware and operating system. Included is a cross-compiled sshd with configuration files to allow for passwordless ssh access to the Archos when it is connected to a WiFi connection. Bricks ahoy!"

102 comments

  1. Why not Nokia N800/810? by isaac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not trying to be flippant here, but I've never heard of this Archos gadget and don't, after a cursory examination, understand why I'd prefer this thing to, say, a Nokia Maemo-based doodad like the N800 or N810? Same screen resolution, wifi, etc - ok, no internal hard drive - and I don't have to jailbreak it to load custom apps.

    Why wouldn't I want to support the company not going out of its way to make my life difficult if custom apps were what I were after?

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    1. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      I have one and I adore it- this is just icing on the cake! Can't wait to get SSH up!

    2. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Not trying to be flippant here, but I've never heard of this Archos gadget and don't, after a cursory examination, understand why I'd prefer this thing to, say, a Nokia Maemo-based doodad like the N800 or N810? Same screen resolution, wifi, etc - ok, no internal hard drive - and I don't have to jailbreak it to load custom apps.

      Why wouldn't I want to support the company not going out of its way to make my life difficult if custom apps were what I were after?

      -Isaac That depends on how you view the device. If you're looking for an internet tablet, the Archos is NOT for you. If you're looking for something you could store a huge library of stuff ready to play on your TV, the Archos would wipe the floor with the Nokia device. If the library of videos isn't interesting to you, then it's a non-choice.
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can think of right now can be summed up in this one pic. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2105/2118990289_c8872b17ed.jpg

      The world is a lot bigger than you know.

    4. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by itsme1234 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you are after custom apps you just don't buy this device. The prices for N800-N810 are about the same as for Archos 605 30GB-160GB. A605 is mainly a video player. If you don't care about the massive storage and you want the 256M or so you can choose the Nokia tablet - sure (or one of the other many linux/wince/palmos devices). Heck, if you don't care about size you can go for the same price with a full blown desktop PC and have a better CPU, run more apps, better screen, input devices and so on.

      Speaking about "why don't you buy" I am quite disappointed by the current offerings for this market (high end PDA/video player). High-end PDA market mid-2004 (!) specs (I think there are at least 5 devices that match more or less the specs below):

      - WinCE/windows mobile (yes, it's M$ but if you need GPS maps for dodgy places this might be your only option - and nobody can complain about lack of apps, need to jailbreak anything, lack of SDK and so on - Hello Apple, are you listening?)
      - wifi (with WPA from day 0)
      - bluetooth
      - usb host (yes you can use your usb stick or external drive)
      - extremely sharp 640x480 display (the devices are much smaller compared to N800)
      - dual expansion slot (CF and SD with CFIO and SDIO, you can add odd peripherals like TV tuner, ethernet card). And of course you can use the existing under-100$ 16GB CF card or the announced 32GB or 64GB CF cards
      - 500-600+ MHz Intel CPU (non-x86). Twice as fast as what you get in most current devices. Forget youtube, that's peanuts-you can play 99% of the divxes and xvids you get DIRECTLY on the PDA without any conversion.

      Again, the above specs are for mid-2004! Of course nobody cared at the time but it seems that the market is slowly picking up. However the dream device seems to be one of the new Intel ultra-small CPUs (x86 compatible) combined with one of these 30-80-160+GB hdds. And it will eventually come (or at least I hope so).

    5. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Eddi3 · · Score: 1

      The Archos 605 is mainly a video player. Videos are big, and require a good screen for viewing pleasure. The Nokia N800/10 has neither: a 16 bit (65k colors) screen, with 128MB-2GB of disk space. The Archos, however, has a 16 million color display, and 30 GB of disk space.

    6. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by bipbop · · Score: 1

      I have 32GB of space (2x 16GB cards) in my n800, but when the 32GB cards hit the market in a few days you'll be able to have 64GB. (The n800 has supported SDHC for quite a while, though before they released the official support you needed a kernel patch.) It's still a tradeoff: it's still less space than a hard drive player could have, for example. But you're not limited to 2GB. Note that the n810 only has one SDHC slot, so you can only expand that to 16GB (or 32GB when the cards come out).

    7. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually have an Archos 605. The reason why I got it was because:
      1. Support for H.264
      2. Pretty big screen to watch movies
      3. Big hard drive to store my movie collection
      4. I didn't know that the N800 actually supported end users who used Linux. I falsely believed that the Archos was the only Media Device I could use my Linux box with.

      However, after buying it, I now regret doing so and can't recommend anybody else to get it. There are issues with updating the firmware; their H.264 codec has playback issues with certain podcasts (most notably the NBC News Podcasts) and I didn't know beforehand that I actually had to PAY to download their web browser plug-in. I hope this hack will let me fix a lot of these issues.

    8. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I hope this exploit will help me unlock my AV700. I have regretted buying this thing for 2 years. Maybe some day I'll be able to do what I want with it I just hope it isn't (even more) obsolete by that time.

    9. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      And once you add in the cost of those sd cards (16gb ones seems amazingly expensive) you are paying a lot more than you would for the archos.

    10. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30GB is not a huge library of stuff. 30GB isn't even enough to hold an mp3 collection let alone videos. In addition, you want to have either flash memory storage or a REMOVABLE hard disk because eventually you are going to drop the thing. Portable USB hard drives are getting cheaper all the time (1.8" 160GB for around $100). In addition, 1.3" drives are getting up to 60GB capacity. With my Nokia 770 in USB host mode, I can easily connect my portable 1,8" USB powered hard drive to my Nokia 770 and either play files on the hard drive or transfer them to flash. If I drop the hard drive, I can just get another one. If you want a device that can play videos, play audio files, browse the internet, do GPS mapping, do spreadsheets, word processing, plotting, book reading, ssh server, ssh client, Internet telephony ect, the Nokia 770 is currently the best choice in the smallest package.

      DRM is also no excuse for Archos not having an SDK. Even with an SDK, nothing prevents Archos from releasing binary only apps that support DRM.

    11. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      The Archos 605 WiFi is 160 GB. Moreover, it can also access files shared from a PC over the network.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    12. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by DJCacophony · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The Archos 605 is 160 gigabytes.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    13. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      The Archos 605 is 160 gigabytes, not 30, and it supports USB host mode just like your Nokia.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    14. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by RailRide · · Score: 1

      There are four models:
      --4GB Flash with a SD slot (accepts SDHC cards)
      --30GB HDD
      --80GB HDD
      --160GB HDD

      I got the 4GB version. My collection of music files--at least the ones I'd want to carry around--isn't large enough to tax it (my last device was a 2GB+MiniSD Avayon MP85) and I was only halfway to filling its onboard memory). I'm also not carrying full DVD movies around, so my video storage needs are extremely light. All that and I didn't want a HDD device in the event it gets dropped.

      ---PCJ

    15. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, the link in the story pointed to the 30GB model. Note that the 160GB model seems to be more expensive. Note that 250GB USB powered hard drives are going for around $150 dollars now. The only thing I can see that the the Archos can do that the Nokia can't is act as a Digital Video Recorder. So, if that's what you want the Device for, then I guess Archos is your choice. If you want an open platform that does play videos, play audio files, browse the internet, do GPS mapping, do spreadsheets, word processing, plotting, book reading, ssh server, ssh client, Internet telephony, games, ect, the Nokia 770 is currently the best choice in the smallest package. Again, if I drop my external hard drive, I can always get another one. Drop your Archos hard drive player 5 times and see how well in operates. I have dropped my Nokia 770 at least 5 times with no ill effects.

    16. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, the link in the story pointed to the 30GB model. Note that the 160GB model seems to be more expensive. Note that 250GB USB powered hard drives are going for around $150 dollars now. The only thing I can see that the the Archos can do that the Nokia can't is act as a Digital Video Recorder. So, if that's what you want the Device for, then I guess Archos is your choice. If you want an open platform that does play videos, play audio files, browse the internet, do GPS mapping, do spreadsheets, word processing, plotting, book reading, ssh server, ssh client, Internet telephony, games, ect, the Nokia 770 is currently the best choice in the smallest package. Again, if I drop my external hard drive, I can always get another one. Drop your Archos hard drive player 5 times and see how well in operates. I have dropped my Nokia 770 at least 5 times with no ill effects. Your Nokia device cannot hook up to a TV and an external drive will require more power. (Not to mention the added bulk of the whole shebang.) The Archos device is a movie player, the Nokia device gets you part of the way (and for a lot of people, that's probably enough.) there.
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    17. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      I have a 604wifi- I want that to be hacked too...

    18. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      might work, and a lot of the time if a programmer writes one vulnerability like this they're going to write others. check the tarball for the 604, theres a lot of a details on how the hack is performed on tfa.

    19. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      There are 4 models: 4gb (+sd slot), 30gb, 80gb and 160gb. They go up in price (and slightly in physical size) as the capacity goes up and the 30gb is the closest in price to the nokia.

    20. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have both. The browser experience on the Archos is vastly superior to the Nokia. Vastly.

    21. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      oh, that's awesome, says it works on the 604wifi too- and the source is on gpl

    22. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the Archos browser experience vastly superior to the Nokia? Which browser are you using on the Nokia?

    23. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      confirmed working on the 604wifi and 700

    24. Re:Why not Nokia N800/810? by Lime+Green+Bowler · · Score: 0

      "30GB is not a huge library of stuff. 30GB isn't even enough to hold an mp3 collection let alone videos."

      Rubbish! I've got 2000 songs on my 30G iPod Video, the entire Pink Floyd Pulse concert video, and Rush R30 concert video. And I've got a third of the drive still free.

  2. display size by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

    I hadn't seen the specs for this device until now, but it sports a 800x480 screen - the same as the EeePc.

  3. Re:Further Info by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

    Some one mod off topic please , minicity troll again

    --
    This package Does Not Contain a Winner
  4. Or Nokia N166/3R? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I hear that model is shiftless.

    1. Re:Or Nokia N166/3R? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The N166/4 is coming out in February, I hope it comes in a better variety of colours

  5. Ditto, and more by mbourgon · · Score: 3, Informative

    What the parent said, but doubly so because, IIRC, the original Archos' were basically saved by the homebrew community, who came up with new, better, firmware for their products. It was a win-win... so why is the new stuff so anti-modder?

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    1. Re:Ditto, and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pure speculation here: that could be a requirement from some other company which makes drivers for some of its parts. They could want hackers kept out of the device in order to minimize the risk of having their drivers reverse engineered through sniffing or other methods.
      Unfortunately, in the embedded market there's a still enormous load of companies that can't make money if they can't be the only one entity on this planet to be able to sell a driver for some piece of hardware.

    2. Re:Ditto, and more by mboverload · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I never understood why companies wanted to make their gadgets unhackable until I read your theory. For some reason it makes me pretty irritated.

      These devices are mini COMPUTERS! If your MP3 player has screen or WiFi then it's obvious it can do more. It's more common that embedded devices just use a processing chip to do all their functions - no more paying for an MP3 decoder chip, MPEG decoder chip, etc. This makes it "easy" to do so much more with them. SO LET US DAMN IT.

      Example: The DS. It should have come with a browser from day one. It's freaking obvious with the two screens. Top screen is for reading and the bottom is to move the magnifying glass around the page.

      If someone who you don't have to pay wants to expand the market for your device why the hell would you stop them?

      The only reason I bought an Xbox 1 was to play videos over my LAN. Of course, I can also play pirated games on it. This is a legit reason a company would want to lock down their hardward. However that is of no concern to Archos -

      they don't SHOULDN'T care what the heck people do with their products as long as they buy them.

    3. Re:Ditto, and more by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that they make up for the cheapness of the device by selling the plugins (posting from a future hacked archos)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    4. Re:Ditto, and more by mboverload · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, this was not the final draft - I was playing with the HTML tags and hit submit instead.

    5. Re:Ditto, and more by mboverload · · Score: 3, Informative

      I WISH TO RETRACT THE ABOVE POST
      IN RELATION TO THIS STORY

      Reason: Unbeknownst to me, Archos has a content portal where you can rent movies and other content. This changes the environment of my post since I was under the assumption they just made MP3 players and did nothing else. With this licensed content they are probably under contract to protect it.

      However, I still believe my post stands on its own when talking about other consumer devices. If anyone has any comments please post

    6. Re:Ditto, and more by wrook · · Score: 1

      As near as I can figure out, this is the thinking that the average business guy has:

      Making money is less about creating a good product and building good customer
      relationships. It's about good timing. Have the right product at the
      right time and at the right price point and you strike it rich. If your
      timing is wrong, no amount of good product or service will save you.

      But timing is ridiculously hard to predict. So instead of concentrating
      of creating a good product that customers want, and supporting it
      so that the customers are happy, put the least amount of effort
      into developing it as possible. Get it out the door fast, fast, fast.

      Likely you will fail, but it doesn't matter because you were fast,
      so you can try again right away. And if you did it right, you
      didn't use your own money. So, keep trying until you strike paydirt.

      But, like I said, timing is difficult. So once you get a success,
      you must hang onto it with a death grip. Don't let anyone else
      compete in your market space. This also means don't allow a
      user to modify it to do something else. Because if they start
      improving the product, you might find yourself redundant
      (especially since you didn't really invest in development
      and may not have the capability to compete).

      So it doesn't matter whether an outside community saved their
      asses in the past. They only see that as part of step one
      (small upfront development cost). If there is success, don't
      share it.

      I personally don't agree with this approach. But I have had
      enough conversations with the "business" side of high tech
      companies to at least partially understand it. However, it's
      one of the big reasons I'm no longer in that industry.

    7. Re:Ditto, and more by Raidedguy · · Score: 1

      Because they sell the ability to play certain codecs for extra, allowing you to run any application, would allow you to bypass this.

    8. Re:Ditto, and more by Pandamonium · · Score: 3, Funny

      If anyone has any comments please post

      No no, wouldn't dream to interrupt your flow as you seem to be doing just fine all by yourself :-)

      --
      Time...line? Time isn't made of lines! It is made of circles. That is why clocks are round.
      -- Caboose
    9. Re:Ditto, and more by internic · · Score: 1

      ...IIRC, the original Archos' were basically saved by the homebrew community, who came up with new, better, firmware for their products. It was a win-win... so why is the new stuff so anti-modder?

      Yeah, I can certainly say that years ago when I bought an Archos Ondio mp3 player I quickly got fed up with the crappy interface. I'd largely stopped using the thing until I downloaded the open source Rockbox firmware. I was really shocked by how incredibly superior the functionality of Rockbox was to the factory installed firmware. I could finally use the player like I should be able to. I probably won't buy another Archos product anyway, due to the problems I experienced with that player, but I certainly wouldn't buy one I couldn't put Rockbox on.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
  6. Re:Further Info by Lingerance · · Score: 1

    Some one mod off topic please , minicity troll again Does anyone have a better solution than the two I've seen? First being a minicity in itself. Second a vain attempt at slashdoting the minicities which encourages them even more (they want traffic).
  7. Great device by sma11s101 · · Score: 1

    I personally own one and use it quite often for searching the web. Considering the price different between this and the N810, its no contest. It does support 3rd party widgets but I'm not sure how many of those are out yet. The web browser itself is quite useable and supports flash which is the only reason I bought it. That and I don't want to be just another ipod user.

    1. Re:Great device by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I have the older 604 Wifi, and like it as well. I still can`t understand why they don`t open it up. In the case of the 604, you can only buy about 30$ worth of software for the thing anyway. Charge the extra money and open the damn thing up. The open source community can probably improve on what you`ve done anyway. Make your money on the hardware and let people use the device the way they want.

    2. Re:Great device by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      I have a 604 WiFi...

      The reason this (and most other consumer devices) do not allow for modifications is real simple. Anyone working with consumer electronics support knows exactly why. What do you do with someone that (a) denies modifying anything and (b) has some unexplicable problem. Do you hang up on them?

      Do you have someone sit on the phone for an hour trying to figure out what the problem might be? After all, they are saying it wasn't modified so it might be some obscure bug that needs to be fixed. How can you tell?

      I suppose you could "open" end-of-life units that there is no support for anymore. But that can compromise the existing codebase for new units as well.

      Nobody has a good answer for this. None that I have heard, anyway. Fortunately, it affects maybe 1% of most devices user base so it doesn't really matter to anyone other than a device owner that wants to muck around with it.

  8. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is terrible! Literally dozens of users are now at risk!

  9. Re:Further Info by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

    Whoops, modded wrong and posting to reverse it.

    --
    I drink to make other people interesting!
  10. Re:Further Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    idiot, you must recognize the minicity troll by now and ignore it, do you really answer every troll?

  11. Re:Further Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That wasn't about the story but that's really cute how do i get a city like that plz?

  12. Possible counter-attacks to myminicity link-spam by Mathinker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > a vain attempt at slashdoting the minicities which encourages them even more

    I would think that it would be possible to try to DDoS the servers themselves by accessing URLs which seem OK but actually don't exist (e.g., take a link to a real myminicity and change the name of the city to a different random string each time). Of course, if the company running the servers is unscrupulous, it could always return ads for what should be 404's. But at the very least, attacking in this way doesn't encourage link spamming from people running the cities. And eventually one could hope that the people paying them for serving the ads would rebel.

    This is of course just academic speculation, actually making such an application, or even encouraging people to access such URLs, might be against the law in the jurisdiction where you live, and I am not recommending that anyone break the law..... of course!

    I'd ask that someone should work up an application like that (anonymously, of course) and post a link to it here, but then a clever myminicity geek could just spoof us with an application that actually accesses his real myminicity. Actually I'd guess it could be worked up in a few lines in Python which most knowledgeable Slashdot users could verify for themselves...

    A totally different way to try to combat would be to choose a random city, access it to obtain the ads, and then click on each ad to find out who is paying for this c**p and then send them email explaining that they are financing link spammers and you are adding them to a list of companies to boycott for financing link spamming by advertising at myminicity.com. To be effective, the list should actually exist and be as widely published as possible.

  13. Re:Further Info by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

    Is this the first antimyminicity myminicity troll?

    --

    Cogito, ergo sig.

  14. In other news by Butisol · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What in the name of baby Jesus in a blender is an Archos 605 WiFi?

    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here's what you do:

      1. highlight what you just wrote
      2. right click it
      3. select Search Google for "..."
      4. ...
      5. profit!

  15. Windows media DRM by garagumu · · Score: 4, Informative

    One reason could be windows media DRM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_(DRM)

    AFAIK, if a device supports "protected windows media", they must comply to some drm security specs from microsoft. One requirement for example, is secure time (user should not be able to reset the device time or change to an earlier time), or that the rng/random seed used to generate keys is "good enough".

    The sad thing is that this device uses linux, but archos is trying to "close" the system, because of a microsoft requirement.

    I don't understand why companies _need_ to support drm'ed media. The Nokia N800 series is very, very open. I suppose it doesn't play drm'ed media, but who wants protected media, anyway? It can play all my mp3's, videos fine.

    1. Re:Windows media DRM by arivanov · · Score: 1
      I don't understand why companies _need_ to support drm'ed media.

      Answer is Apple. The marketing droids have looked at the iTunes/AppleStore and decided that its complete featureset is an essential combination to have in any music device. What they are missing is that it is the iTunes superb ability to manage music collections which is the reason for Apple dominance, not the complete feature set and the iTunes store. Less than 0.1% of the music on iPods is from the iTunes Store. Unfortunately as quite often when Marketing, Internet and Reality meet, it is the Reality which suffers most.

      Instead of pushing to have good GUI front-ends capable to compete with Apple all wannabie marketing and product development teams are pushing to have all items on a ticklist to be able to compete with the full iTunes/Store featureset. In the meantime apple is quietly chuckling while increasing its dominance.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Windows media DRM by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      I have the 160GB version of the Archos 605 (the large storage capacity, and my aversion to Apple, was the main reason for getting it) and managing files couldn't be simpler - it can either mount as a hard drive to be managed with the tool of your choice, or as an MTP device to be managed with WMP, MediaMonkey, etc. Or you can avoid mounting it at all and pull files off your network onto the device over Wifi (or just stream them).

  16. Re:HAPPY NEW YEAR'S by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

    Score 0 Offtopic So what is lamer?
    The story posted as 2008 was ushered in?
    The guy that thought he was clever saying happy new year on the first post of 2008?
    Or myself, writing about the guy that commented on the story that was the first of 2008?

    I think it's all pretty obvious! *hic* /cheers
    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  17. Why they are so anti-modder . . . by Cyberllama · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IIRC, they have previously announced plans to sell added codec support (for instance, I have one of their earlier models and I can play almost any divx/xvid file I download off the internet -- provided they have mp3 audio -- those with AAC audio give me no sound) and that sort of thing. If people start implementing new codecs and making this thing compatabile with more types of media files than it already is, that's one less revenue stream for archos.

    While I don't like this approach, it is understandable and I love my archos quite a bit so I'm willing to overlook it. Heck, if they'd give me the option of playing AAC on *my* model I'd shell out the extra cash for it.

    1. Re:Why they are so anti-modder . . . by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Actually everything, including the codecs and the browser are already installed. Unlocking is acheived by installing a 1.5 Kb license file which is unique for every serial number.

  18. The only reason for keeping my Archos 605 by pawstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am so glad this happened - Archos should be happy too! I bought an Archos 605 during the boxing week specials since I heard that it runs linux under the hood. I was EXTREMELY disappointed when I found out that I could not run any third party apps, especially my own and I was about to return the device ASAP (no returns allowed during boxing week). However, now that the device has been opened up, I am definitely NOT returning it! I am suddenly thrilled with my purchase and I am thinking about BUYING ONE MORE UNIT if I can find another good deal on it! Thats right! I want another one - one as a media player, and another as a linux PDA! What a great little toy it will be! So Archos ... if you want more people like me to support you - don't close the unit up. Open it up and allow for modding. You will loose nothing but gain a wider customer base. (As a side note, a compromise could have easily have been accomplished by Archos by giving an unsupported firmware that opens up the unit but wipes out all the DRM support so no loss there for anyone who wants an open device and does not want to use it for buying/renting media. But honestly, when it comes to DRM, as we all know it doesn't deter the pirates but hurts legitimate users.)

    1. Re:The only reason for keeping my Archos 605 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its running Linux, just download the source they make available and recompile with the options you want. Or don't they comply with the GPL?

    2. Re:The only reason for keeping my Archos 605 by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sometimes companies have a key they sign the firmware with, and will not update to an un-signed key. That is valid with the GPL v2, and I think one of the biggest changes with the GPL v3.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    3. Re:The only reason for keeping my Archos 605 by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I just want to clarify. You bought the unit. It was software locked. This made you mad and you wanted to return it. Then someone hacked it, unauthorized by the manufacturer. Now you're happy, and going to buy a second unit.

      And then you say to the manufacturer, if you want more people like me to support you, open it up.

      But people like you just bought 2 units. So why should the manufacturer bother opening it up?

      Now, if people like you bought 0 units, but would buy 2 units if they were unlocked, that might give them reason to unlock it. But people like you bought 2 units, which is twice as many as they'd expect the normal consumer to buy.

      So where's the incentive?

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  19. Vs the N810 by MrCopilot · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hmm, fork over my cash to a company doing all they can to stifle open source contributions to their device OR Support the open company to community atmosphere of the Maemo project with my $300.

    Decisions, decisions.

    Yeah, I'm gonna have to go Nokia on this one. $299.00 n800

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    1. Re:Vs the N810 by kabz · · Score: 1

      Actually, the link is showing at $219.99, which would be irrestible if it was GSM, instead of just WiFi. Why must Nokia cripple this really cool device without the GSM? Why? Why?

      As it stands, my iPhone actually is a phone, plus a great web browser. I'll pass.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    2. Re:Vs the N810 by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      Why must Nokia cripple this really cool device without the GSM? Why? Why?

      From http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/Semi-Convergence_Can_you_have_your_cake_and_eat_it_with_the_Nokia_N800.php

      The N800 can access the Internet through (in theory) any Bluetooth mobile phone, which makes life a lot easier when you're trying to buy a new phone.

      Except for a few compatibility issues with particular models, you can pretty much get whichever phone you want. Because the N800 can handle all the expensive and demanding Internet and multimedia functions, the only minimum requirement is that the phone can work as a Bluetooth modem. It doesn't even have to be a Nokia, and the N800 can work with GSM, CDMA and 3G phones.

      It's not a phone. Can be used as a Voip Phone (Gtalk, Skype), but it's intended purpose is an Internet Tablet.
      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    3. Re:Vs the N810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why must Nokia cripple this really cool device without the GSM?


      Because adding phoning capabilities would have required a whole layer of closed obscurity between Linux and the GSM radio subsystem, in order to keep the latter unreachable by user written applications. There's no way in this planet and century you can have an open GSM phone, and the N810 makes no exception.
      Also, most people would rather have a phone that only phones and a tablet they can hack without the fear of becoming unreachable.
    4. Re:Vs the N810 by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You can connect it via a bluetooth phone which never has to leave your pocket...
      The N800 is large by necessity of having a fairly big screen, it would make a poor phone at that size.
      You don't even need a Nokia phone, any bluetooth phone with 3g/gprs modem capability will work.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  20. Security through obscurity isn't secure by davidwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many closed-source routers and similar devices have similar vulnerabilities?

    How many of these vulnerabilities are known only to black-hats?

    The nice thing about open source is that both black- and white-hats will find the bugs sooner, and the time interval that the bug is exploitable and unpatched is likely to be shorter.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Security through obscurity isn't secure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if only someone would bother to hack the firmware for ink-jet printers...

      1. It'd be nice to be able to continue printing in B/W for a text document, even if yellow or some other color is empty.
      2. Get rid of pointless expiration dates. It would be nice to be able to use ink bought over six months ago while on discount - it should still be plenty fresh in that sealed container.
      3. And for shits and giggles, show your friends that your All-in-one can play "I'm a Yankee-doodle dandy" or some other silly tune on it's flatbed scanner motor.
      * bonus item * (may or may not apply). Access features which are normally disabled on your model because you didn't pay an extra $50 for some button or whatever.

  21. Active your TinyUrl preview! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Informative

    Go to http://tinyurl.com/preview.php and (with cookies enabled for this site) click "Click here to enable previews". Et voilà - the next time you click the tinyurl, you'll be able to check were you're actually heading. It's not that difficult, is it? It also protects you from shock sites, at least in the case of a notorious full address of the site.

    (Maybe a checker could be integrated into Slashdot itself - it takes but a single HTTP connection to tinyurl.com to fetch the full address and you could cache it locally and instead of [tinyurl.com] display something like [myminicity.com @ tinyurl.com] next to the link. But you can check it yourself right now, no excuses!)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Active your TinyUrl preview! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that, no more trips to holdenville for me well from redirects from tinyurl at least.
        hopefully the spam will abate, chances are we will have to wait till the end of the school holidays

  22. Re:Further Info by snl2587 · · Score: 1

    It has.....evolved......

  23. Re:Or, alternatively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong, Spamboy? Someone ruining your scam?

  24. Re:Possible counter-attacks to myminicity link-spa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a pity myminicity doesn't provide "leave town" links. Counter-population spam might be amusing. In the meantime, you could help sink minicities by providing population to their competitors. For example, the city below "holdenville" in the rankings is "dino-ville". Go there. Give them some population. Knock "holdenville" down a peg. Then find the next city to boost and knock them down again.

  25. Re:Possible counter-attacks to myminicity link-spa by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Frankly, in agreement with the post I replied to, I think any kind of activity within the framework of that game would in the end be counterproductive. What we need to develop is ways to "persuade" the game architects to prevent link-spamming from being profitable for the players of the game, or make games which encourage link-spamming not profitable.

    Bruce Schneier often comments on the problem of these kinds of externalities.

  26. you should have returned it as defective by plasmacutter · · Score: 0, Troll

    was EXTREMELY disappointed when I found out that I could not run any third party apps, especially my own and I was about to return the device ASAP (no returns allowed during boxing week).


    you should have returned it as "defective" (specifically defective by design), and gotten the nokia model everyone's been talking about in this discussion.

    If you can, do it now. They'll probably brick your phone anyway like apple did.
    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  27. Remove the harddrive lock protection! by hack++slash · · Score: 1

    Archos have made some very nice PMPs, but all their PMPs from the AV500 & AV700 onwards have been locked in regards to replacing the harddrive, if you try to replace the harddrive with a different or identical size (even model/make) it refuses to use it.

    They are a bunch of wankers. The harddrive in my AV500 has developed a few errors, the only way I can use the unit is to leave 'dead' files covering the bad blocks and never delete or read them, I've contacted Archos about getting a new drive but they don't want to seem to know - they're too busy peddling their newer units with the same harddrive locking shit.

    I'm glad someone managed to hack the 605, please can someone write an app that can allow anyone to upgrade/replace the harddrive so people can give the middle finger to Archos (and save themselves a fortune for an over-priced harddrive).

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  28. unquoted system() call by cyberst()rm · · Score: 1

    Can someone explain me how system() function is used here to execute arbitrary code?

    1. Re:unquoted system() call by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:unquoted system() call by bubulubugoth · · Score: 1

      That is a sql injection, not a system injection...

      --
      Â_Â
    3. Re:unquoted system() call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't generalize from the example to see how it would work for system() too, then take your computer back to the store where you bought it, because you're too stupid to use it.

  29. Re: Check Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The price is actually 219.00 for the N800 right now!
    Certainly agree with you on this one. Why support some FOSS using anti-FOSS company when you can get a nice N series for less money.

  30. Inside Archos 605 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Archos is based on a TI DualCore DaVinci http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tms320dm6446.html , the mobile version. The DSP side contains codecs that are proprietary to TI. The ARM side contains Linux and a bunch of supporting software to read media files and software for AV Sync. More info regarding the DSP side architecture here http://wiki.davincidsp.com/index.php?title=Codec_Engine_Roles. The codecs are combined into a single DSP image, TI provides Eval codecs that can be used to hack to get more functionality. One can register on TI's website and get the concerning tools from their webiste to compile the DSP side components.

  31. trickle down to gen 4 and non wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will this be able to eventually trickle down to gen 4 devices, and non wifi?

    i've got a 504 with an 80 gig drive, and i'd love to be able to drop a 160 gig (or bigger) drive in, and unlock the dvd/podcasting codecs that are a $30 extra you have to pay to archos.

    archos wrote firmware that will not allow you to install a larger drive, and wrote the firmware so you couldn't roll back after a certain version (that did allow a hard drive swap)

    the ability to attach cameras or other devices and record to the archos was the main selling feature for me. a larger hard drive would mean longer recordings.

  32. Why Not COWON Q5W Instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Cowon has a laundry list of features, and I don't think there is any problem with the WiFi being difficult. The COWON ships with most of the codec support that the Archos wants to sell you. That is just ridiculous.

    1. Re:Why Not COWON Q5W Instead? by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      Hard drive space. Cowon has 30GB, Archos has over 5 times that. If Cowon put a 160+ gig drive in their hardware, I would be all over that shit, but they never seem to get around to it.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  33. An Entirely Different Reason by Karja · · Score: 1

    I personally would spend alot more time at libraries except for the fact that I tend to check out too many books, lose a few, not return them on time, and then have hefty fines. After a few huge bills, I decided to just remove the temptation to be irresponsible. That, and the fact that all the libraries in my area probably have shoot to kill orders upon my appearance.

    1. Re:An Entirely Different Reason by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I'd go so far as to say that this is a radically different reason, unless perhaps you posted your comment to the wrong story. Doh! =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  34. 'Go Fighting Tabby!' by tabby · · Score: 1

    woar!

    --
    I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
  35. Archos HW == Low Quality, Software Equally So by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Archos have made some very nice PMPs, but all their PMPs from the AV500 & AV700 onwards have been locked in regards to replacing the harddrive, if you try to replace the harddrive with a different or identical size (even model/make) it refuses to use it.

    They are a bunch of wankers. The harddrive in my AV500 has developed a few errors, the only way I can use the unit is to leave 'dead' files covering the bad blocks and never delete or read them, I've contacted Archos about getting a new drive but they don't want to seem to know - they're too busy peddling their newer units with the same harddrive locking shit.

    I'm glad someone managed to hack the 605, please can someone write an app that can allow anyone to upgrade/replace the harddrive so people can give the middle finger to Archos (and save themselves a fortune for an over-priced harddrive).

    Ditto.

    I have an AV420, which I bought after work bought the AV300. That was a really nice unit.

    I bought a 704Wifi, which is nice because of its large screen, but I had to take it back twice because the LCD screen had dead pixels on it. Irritating ones, at that. Good thing I bought the damn thing on sale - when they were at their original price, a defect like that would be inexcusable. Spend half a grand, get a screen with dots all over it. And Archos RMA won't touch it because you need at least *4* pixels. 2 sub-pixels don't count, they have to be 4 discrete pixels. Granted, it's an 800x480 screen, but still.

    I bought a 605, and that thing has been a disaster. The first unit was Dead on Arrival, and because local stores didn't have it, I bought it online. It took a month to arrive! (Dead). It took two more months to get it exchanged. And the replacement unit died after two days (I sorta expected it - the replacement unit's hard drive buzzed ever so horribly). I did the RMA and its replacement arrived just before Christmas, when I placed the order ... September 3rd. In November, I bought one at the local store because I was fed up with the whole thing. Funny thing, the first replacement and the one I got from the store had dead pixels. Luckily, its replacement and the exchange I did in store were dead pixel free.

    Awful, just awful quality. And it looks like you have to "baby" the unit just to avoid breaking the hard disk. And the LCD isn't as vibrant or rich as even the iPod. Or Zune. The touchscreen doesn't help but as we see from the iPod Touch, iPhone, Samsung's touchscreen ones, it's possible to have a nice display with a touchscreen. And yes, you still need 4 pixels nonfunctional to get an RMA based on the screen.

    Archos also managed to put in a bunch of ads in the 605. First time you plug in USB, if you click "Charge only", it prompts you to buy the DVR Dock where it can charge faster. If you access the Web icon, it says you need to buy the Web plug-in. Ditto with videos or audio encoded with MPEG2, H.264 (MPEG-4 AVC), AAC, or AC-3. It'll bug you to buy another plug in. (Total cost for plugins - $70). Click "Recorder", and you get another ad for either the DVR dock, or portable dock (with necessary "buy" links). To their credit, they include a "Never bug me about this again". But still... rather than disable the functionality, they just use to to eke a few more dollars from you.

    And yes, I have two of those things. The one I bought retail, and the RMA'd one. Only thing I can say, is the RMA was a brand new unit. Maybe I'll have some fun with this hack.

    Also, the hard drive is locked by the bootloader - unless you can JTAG it, there's no way to fix it.

    Recommendations - buy it retail - not online. Or you'll regret it as there's a very good chance your expensive purchase has defects that you can't exchange or RMA. Also, buy the extended warranty - if you so much as move it when it's spinning, it may start clicking and die spontaneously. Treating it like an iPod, you won't - jerk it around and your hard disk will die from bad sectors. (Unlike

    1. Re:Archos HW == Low Quality, Software Equally So by Tiny+Elvis · · Score: 1

      I've got an AV500 and a 605 and I love both. Both are great but since getting the 605 I haven't used the 500 much. I never had any hard drive problems with either (I have had the 500 for several years) and I have never baby'd them either. I think both have beautiful screens, especially the 605 because of the much higher resolution. No, the 605 is not perfect but its a damn good unit. The hard drive does not 'spin all the time', it comes on periodically while watching. Battery life is about 4-5 hours. Using a tekkeon battery pack with 2700 nimh AAs plugged into the minidock I can get about 9 hours. Also I can do things like stream video from my uPnP server. On the negative side I have heard bad things about Archos support. Luckily I haven't had to call them yet.

  36. Re:Are they allowed to use Linux and close the sw? by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    I thought that is they base their product on Linux (gpl) that they had to disclose the source code of their device. Microsoft can close the software comprising their protected video path bec ause Windows is their's. But I thought that was basically why we didn't have HD players based on Linux...

  37. Got nothing to do with Apple by argent · · Score: 1

    Jobs has consistently said that iTunes only supports DRM because it was required to by the content creators. He said that when the iTunes store opened, he said that when he asked content creators to back down on DRM this year, he said that when EMI went DRM-free.

    The timeline doesn't fit, either.

    The iTunes Music Store opened at the end of 1Q 2003.

    Windows Media DRM shipped in 1999.

    By the time iTMS opened, Windows Media Player 9 had already been augmented by kernel components to prevent even driver-level access to the media stream. That's stronger protection than Apple ever implemented in iTunes, *before* Apple shipped a version of iTunes with DRM.