Slashdot Mirror


NSI Registers Every Domain Checked

An anonymous reader writes "In a developing story, registrar Network Solutions has been caught front-running domain names. Any domain names searched via NSI's whois are being immediately purchased by the registrar, thereby preventing a registrant from purchasing the domain at any other registrar. There are multiple reports of this practice over at DomainState.com." Update: 01/09 01:58 GMT by KD : shashib writes to let us know that NSI has issued a response to the accusations of front running.

72 of 668 comments (clear)

  1. Any way to... by Jaysyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...automate requests with a dictionary? Make them bankrupt themselves purchasing bogus domains?

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:Any way to... by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was just about to post that ;) Best idea ever.... quoting this from DomainState.com: someone could totally script this and run there credit through the roof with the registry hahahahaha.

      Assuming it costs them SOMETHING (even pennies) to register a domain with the central registry then I think this is an absolutely awesome idea. I'll run such a script if someone writes it. In fact maybe I'll write one myself, because screwing over NSI sounds like a much better way to spend my afternoon then doing anything productive ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Any way to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


      uselessdomain00001.com
      uselessdomain00002.com
      uselessdomain00003.com
      uselessdomain00004.com...


      too subtle

      FuckYouNSI00001.com
      FuckYouNSI00002.com
      FuckYouNSI00003.com
      FuckYouNSI00004.com...

    3. Re:Any way to... by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Make them bankrupt themselves purchasing bogus domains?

      I doubt they're making any financial commitment "purchasing" these domains. They're simply putting in a database record, and then removing it within the 5-day grace period (thus removing any liability to any other registrars).
    4. Re:Any way to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In fact maybe I'll write one myself, because screwing over NSI sounds like a much better way to spend my afternoon then doing anything productive ;)

      You must work for the government.

    5. Re:Any way to... by glpierce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They won't lose any money (that's the whole point of "tasting", isn't it?), but that doesn't mean it wouldn't hurt them. If someone made a script that would search for every possible domain (up to say, 50 characters in length), no other registrar would be able to sell anything. There are enough competitors with enough money and enough at stake to pressure ICANN to take action if that happened. They could also theoretically sue NSI for attempting to create a monopoly (I assume there's some law it would break). Of course, that assumes that NSI doesn't pull the plug quickly enough.

      --
      G
    6. Re:Any way to... by kmac06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Screwing over NSI is productive!

    7. Re:Any way to... by misleb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if enough people are scripting bogus names,
      perhaps their database and/or db server will choke.
      THAT will cost them money to bring back online.


      Yeah, but then you'd be arrested as a "terrorist."

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    8. Re:Any way to... by mr_walrus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      which "you"? it would require thousands of people hitting the db at the same time.
      individually no-one would be capable of doing it.

      unless you are orchestrating/controlling a Botnet to do a DoS attack. ...but those who have control over botnets wouldnt be so mean as to direct
      their efforts at NSI would they? :)
      after all, they are already considered terrorists and have nothing to gain :)

      a plain DoS would cost them money in lost business.

    9. Re:Any way to... by Hawke · · Score: 5, Informative

      Er, no. Verisign owns the .com, .net registries. Verisign used to own Network Solutions, but they were spun out several years ago.

    10. Re:Any way to... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Assuming it costs them SOMETHING (even pennies) to register a domain with the central registry then I think this is an absolutely awesome idea. I'll run such a script if someone writes it. In fact maybe I'll write one myself, because screwing over NSI sounds like a much better way to spend my afternoon then doing anything productive ;)

      If you can't write that in under three lines in the scripting language of your choice, you officially lose your nerd card. ;)

    11. Re:Any way to... by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Make them bankrupt themselves in court. Instead of random names, use a dictionary of trademarks, politician's names, law firm names, etc. Get Network Solutions to register authenticdisneymerchandise.com, applemultimediacomputers.com, deweycheathamandhowelimited.com, advicefrommichaelmukasey.org, etc. Then write a letter of appreciation to Disney, about how grateful you are that they're selling Mickey Mouse porn so cheaply.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    12. Re:Any way to... by djtack · · Score: 5, Informative
      Here ya go... One thing, I noticed NSI stops registering domains after about 50 or so.

      #!/usr/bin/perl

      $count = $ARGV[0] || 8;
      @charlist = (A .. Z, a .. z, 0 .. 9);

      while (1) {
      my $domain = "";
      foreach $i (1 .. $count) {

      $word = `dd bs=1 count=4 if=/dev/random 2> /dev/null`;

      $number = unpack I1, $word;
      $number = $number / 2**32;
      $number *= scalar @charlist;
      $number = int $number;

      $domain .= $charlist[$number];
      }

      print `whois -h whois.networksolutions.com $domain.com`;
      sleep 2;
      }
    13. Re:Any way to... by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't believe I forgot the best one. Don't forget Scientology. religioustechnologycenterlicensing.com is a great domain name. Network Solutions should snatch it up at once.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    14. Re:Any way to... by LithiumX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was thinking more along the lines of trademark infringement. Something that would never go to court, but would result in a pretty quick C&D letter from a number of companies who are uncomfortable with their name being auto-registered on a whim.

      I did verify that you have to initiate a purchase before they auto-register. If you simply do a search, they don't do anything (that I can see), but if you click on "Add Domains to Order", it shows up on a general whois a few seconds later, allocated for a year.

      My question is... how long do they keep it? If they were to drop it after say, a few hours... even a few days... I'd consider it a dangerously abuseable practice but little worse. If they keep it any longer than that, it's a few steps shy of a domain hijack.

      Seriously, I think it's just meant to be a service, but I don't see how it offers any kind of service if they allow others to waltz in and register these names themselves (which it sounds like they do, judging from posts on DomainState).

      --
      Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    15. Re:Any way to... by UsualDosage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the rationale behind this isn't entirely malicious. Consider the fact that domains are valuable property. If you were in the process of buying a domain, and had to take the time to fill our user information, credit card information and all of the textboxes that they make you fill out (particularly if you are a first time user), there is a good chance that someone from another registrar could snatch the domain out from under you simply because they were a faster typer, or had previously registered. In this way, if you do a WHOIS search with NSI, the name is locked for a short time to allow you to complete your transaction, and to disallow anyone else who may be following in your tracks to buy you your name before you can.

      It makes sense, and I'm frankly surprised that no one hasn't noticed this before. I for one am glad that someone peeking over my shoulder can buy a domain from their iPhone before I can finish clicking "buy".

      --
      "A true friend stabs you in the front." -Oscar Wilde
    16. Re:Any way to... by the_one(2) · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't discourage him =)

    17. Re:Any way to... by Dan667 · · Score: 4, Funny

      In perl, you could do it in one line with a haiku poem.

    18. Re:Any way to... by SnapperHead · · Score: 5, Funny

      Domain Name: USELESSDOMAIN00001.COM
            Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
            Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
            Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com/
            Name Server: NS1.RESERVEDDOMAINNAME.COM
            Name Server: NS2.RESERVEDDOMAINNAME.COM
            Status: ok
            Updated Date: 08-jan-2008
            Creation Date: 08-jan-2008
            Expiration Date: 08-jan-2009

      Nice, how nice

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    19. Re:Any way to... by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 4, Informative
      Or if you prefer Ruby...

      #!/usr/bin/env ruby -w
      require 'rubygems'
      require "mechanize"
       
      search_form = WWW::Mechanize.new.get("http://www.networksolutions.com/").forms.first
      search_field = search_form.fields.name("domainNames").first
      1.upto 10 do |i|
        puts search_field.value = "netsol-sucks-#{'x'*i}.com"
        search_form.submit
      end
    20. Re:Any way to... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In perl, you could do it in one line with a haiku poem.

      Sure, but nobody could read it.

    21. Re:Any way to... by drgould · · Score: 4, Informative
    22. Re:Any way to... by Rihahn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whoa! Don't use that word!

      Somewhere in an AT&T monitoring center a little light with a handwritten "Terrorist" tag next to it lit up...

    23. Re:Any way to... by dpilot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So if you're domain-shopping, the obvious method is to build a loop like this, and tack your real request somewhere at the back end.

      Then when they get wise to that, and start queuing requests, checking the first N and the last N, you need a back-end loop, as well.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    24. Re:Any way to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just tried 3 domain names. The 1st and 3rd domain name, I used their website search feature. They snagged those 2 up quick. The second domain I searched, I did a "whois -h whois.networksolutions.com ..." and they did not snatch up that domain name. Apparently, they are only snatching searched made through their website interface.

    25. Re:Any way to... by kvezach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about doing a whois on one of the AACS keys? DMCA-tastic!

    26. Re:Any way to... by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well that page does say that they register 600,000 daily. :)

    27. Re:Any way to... by wdr1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You both missed a very key point: they're not paying these domains.

      The simply reserve them using a registrar's 5 day grace period & if nobody buys the domain from Network Solution for 5 days, they simply release the reserve. I.e., it's available again to the general public.

      It's something a registrar can do, that you & I can't. Basically, a loophole that a few trusted companies in the system are exploiting for profit.

      This came up a big back when a registrar would "try" domains, to see if the type-in traffic made more than the cost of registering. (E.g., by using Google's DomainPark for Domain Squatters.)

      The President of GoDaddy wrote about it a little over a year ago:

      http://www.bobparsons.com/DomainKiting.html.

      One registrar in particular, DirectNIC, "registered" 8.4 million domains but only permanently registered -- i.e. paid for -- 51,400.

      Overall, I'm with you in spirit of screwing bastards like this over, but it seems the only way to do so is close the loophole in the system.

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    28. Re:Any way to... by morcego · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about this:

      for i in `seq -w 1 100`
      do
      lynx -dump http://www.nsi.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=dienetworksolutions${i}.com > /dev/null
      done

      --
      morcego
    29. Re:Any way to... by fastest+fascist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously, since the alternative seems to be actually doing something productive, the parent does NOT work for the government.

    30. Re:Any way to... by enoz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure, but nobody could read it.

      Which is quite the irony, because it would be the first ever haiku worth reading.
    31. Re:Any way to... by sp3d2orbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Disclaimer, I worked at a registrar some years ago, not NSI, one of their competitors. As such, I would never advocate anyone scripting lookup information. However, I did have some observations about the approach.

      It may not cost them any money for the domain, but the whole process costs some pennies. There are bandwidth costs, obviously. Not just to the user doing the lookup but between the registrar and their data centers, and the central registry. Harddisk costs for data, logs, analysis, etc.

      A larger cost would be in their database. NS only has ~6.6 million domains under registry. Adding a few hundred thousand domains (even for a few days) could cause some serious indexing and performance issues.

      With all these scripted domains coming in it will mess up any advertising models they have setup. Also, if they haven't been very, very careful, you could trick them into buying the domain by doing a recheck every couple of days. Waiting until the very last second to check the name again may be more than their system is setup to handle.

      Like I've said please don't script them. Knowledge should never be used to maintain the balance of power. Those in authority always have your best interests at heart. When those who love you appear to abuse you it is for your own good. Don't fight the man. Etc, etc, etc.

  2. Please don't disturb me. by flaming+error · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm working on a program to perform millions of random whois searches via NSI.

    1. Re:Please don't disturb me. by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry but what was that again? Sorry, I was working on a program to perform millions of random whois searches via NSI and wasn't paying attention.

      What?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:Please don't disturb me. by hedleyroos · · Score: 5, Funny

      I code in Python. My program is already running :)

  3. I always assumed they did this by Evro · · Score: 3, Informative

    They control a big database and know when someone's about to buy something from one of their competitors, so they instantly buy it so the person has to buy it from them for any fee they want to charge. This is historically one of the most unethical companies around, I always assumed they did this, I'm just glad I got my domain ~10 years ago when it was actually possible.

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:I always assumed they did this by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eleven years ago when I first started working for an ISP, they were called Network Hell, and they had richly earned the moniker then, but their deeds over the last five years makes me think they want to earn some sort of record as the most unethical company in history.

      ICANN didn't have the balls to kill the contract a few years ago, maybe they will finally do the right thing and rid the Internet of this vile vile monster.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  4. Re:Make it cost them ... by anotherone · · Score: 5, Informative

    RTFA. If the user doesn't buy in a few days, they delete the domain- doesn't cost them anything.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  5. Time for it to go by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but its simply time for free domain tasting to go. It costs something like $6 at the back end to register a domain for one year and its a hardship on no legitimate use if they have to pay another $6 to correct a typo.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  6. Well, they're now the proud owners of by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 5, Funny

    network-solutions-hates-non-whites.com
    our-ceo-jacks-off-to-goatse.com
    batman-touched-my-junk-liberally.com

    --
    If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
  7. DNS and Certificate services by Deadplant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The domain name registrars and the ssl certificate services are all run by crooks.
    It is appalling that so much of our security infrastructure relies on this pack of thieves.

    What should be we do to correct this problem?

    Perhaps a consortium of the major Internet providers could start up a new DNS system.
    I'm not talking about Comcast/verizon/aol, I'm talking about Level3, Cogent, Teleglobe etc..

    thoughts?

  8. Re:Use the /. effect to make them screw themselves by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, we can create a link that has a simple php script to have the user check a random domain through them. That way it isn't all coming from one IP Address...

    Who needs a script when you have the power of Slashdot? /me goes off to join the crowd at the whois watering hole...
    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  9. Don't use WHOIS by Antibozo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whether it's NSI or some other registrar doing it, this has been a known issue for a long time. The solution is not to use WHOIS. Instead follow DNS from the root and see if it goes anywhere. E.g.:

    dig the-domain-you-want.com. +trace
    1. Re:Don't use WHOIS by Deadplant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The solution is not to use WHOIS. Instead follow DNS from the root and see if it goes anywhere.


      Nah, that's a workaround.
      The solution is to revoke their corporate charter.
  10. ICANN to the rescue! by EllynGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't worry, ICANN will fix everything and make it right!

    I slay me.

    --

    we will end no whine before its time

  11. Re:Can't be ALL of them. by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Now try to purchase one of those at a different registrar.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  12. Re:Dupedy do dah, dupidee-ay by Xonea · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is no dupe as this shows a specific example of someone practicing it.

    Now you can relly test it; I searched for about 20 domainnames and they are now all registered by NS.

  13. Re:Dupedy do dah, dupidee-ay by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Domains may disappear" is a bit different than "NSI Registers Every Domain checked"

    News does evolve over time... that's why it's news.

  14. Re:Can't be ALL of them. by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Go to networksolutions.com and check the availability of a random domain
    2. Go to some other registrar (domainsatcost.ca worked for me) and try the same thing.

    Mysteriously, the domain is suddenly unavailable.

  15. Big companies who commit big crimes go free..... by Raisey-raison · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I never understand why given that this is blatantly anti competitive, companies aren't immediately prosecuted under anti trust laws with their directors going to prison. And don't forget about some nasty fines and civil penalties. So if we find a college kid who copies a movie we prosecute the f*ck out of them and financially squeeze them until they are thoroughly screwed over. But if you are a big company and you screw over millions of people, you get off scot-free. Apart from the fact that the rule of law is a joke if the powerful are not investigated it would be better for the economy and everyone's standard of living if anti trust laws were enforced. How many extra thousands of dollars every year do we spend on things because they are more expensive than they would naturally be if companies were not violating anti trust laws.

  16. Web form that doesn't log your domain lookup. by suso · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here, use this:

    http://support.suso.org/dns/saferdomainlookup.php

    I wrote it a few months ago after these types of issues started coming up. I provide some transparency so that you can have confidence in trusting it. Of course, you can always use command line whois or DNS tools.

  17. Re:spam the spammers? by the_B0fh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't you mean....

    justchecking.com ?????

  18. Re:Can't be ALL of them. by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 4, Informative

    Criminy, this is bad.

    1. Went to godaddy.com and searched for {obscurewords}.com. It's available.
    2. Went to networksolutions.com and searched for the same. It's available.
    3. Went back to godaddy.com and searched for the same, again. NOT available!

    NS is rotten to the core.

  19. Yes, another confirmation. by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just looked up Network-solutions-antitrust-violation-demo.com. and Network Solutions registered it.

    Time for ICANN to issue a policy under the registrar agreement to enforce section 3.7.9: "Registrar shall abide by any ICANN adopted specifications or policies prohibiting or restricting warehousing of or speculation in domain names by registrars."

  20. Re:The greater irony is.. by oahazmatt · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..that I tested this out using the domain name 'networksolutionsjustlostacustomer.com', which is still up for grabs.. but only via networksolutions, natch.
    Ha! I showed them! I got 'networksolutionsjustlostacustomer.net' at GoDaddy!
    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
  21. PR response from NSI by vmxeo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Domain Name Wire has posted a response from NSI's PR department. Here's the relevent quote from NSI:

    I just got off the phone with Susan Wade, who heads PR for Network Solutions. "This is a customer protection measure to protect customers from frontrunners," said Wade. "After four days, we release the domain." According to Wade, Network Solutions instituted this program as a test over the past few weeks. I asked if Network Solutions is actually acting as a frontrunner by doing this and she said there's a distinction. First, they are not monetizing the domains. Second, they have no intention of keeping the domains. All domains are released after the four day period.

    Translation: So if anyone else does it, it's bad, because they're domain front-running. But when we do it's it's ok, because, uh, we say so. No, really!

  22. Call for more info by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I checked an obscure domain name through them in the last several days and it was available. Lo and behold, it is now registered. I will be calling their support line at 1.888.642.9675, and / or their technical support line at 1.866.391.HELP to figure out what is going on.

    I sure hope I don't take up too much of their time, because 1-800 minutes aren't cheap for them, neither is tying up their support personnel. However, if you're curious about these practices, you might want to speak with them yourself - it's your right after all.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  23. Not a chance by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry pal, this is Slashdot. Source or GTFO.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  24. Network Solutions' Response by linumax · · Score: 4, Informative
    Found it here.

    "This is a customer protection measure to protect customers from frontrunners," said Wade. "After four days, we release the domain." According to Wade, Network Solutions instituted this program as a test over the past few weeks. I asked if Network Solutions is actually acting as a frontrunner by doing this and she said there's a distinction. First, they are not monetizing the domains. Second, they have no intention of keeping the domains. All domains are released after the four day period.
    IMHO, bullshit.
    1. Re:Network Solutions' Response by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Its a lie. if you check Ihaveabigprick.com and its available, 2 days later Joe Schmoe from Poughkeepsie can come along and register it, provided he does it at NetSol. It will show up as unavailable elsewhere, but available at NetSol.

      So, this does nothing to protect you from having your domain registered out from under you provided the other person uses NetSol. The only one it protects is NetSol from having you decide to register it elsewhere with a registrar who doesn't charge NetSol's ripoff price. It's a "feature" solely to benefit NetSol at the EXPENSE of everyone else. Slimy fuckers that they have always been.

      --
      This space available.
  25. Re:It doesn't cost them by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Funny

    Which, might in turn make the vile practice of "domain tasting" (which benefits NOBODY but scammers) to be banned.


    "Don't taste me, bro" --Domain
  26. Re:At 4:24 PM (EDT-US) by Ewan · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not a hold tag, they do actually register it - it's called domain tasting. You can register a domain and keep it for 5 days before you need to either pay for it or release it.

    What NSI are doing is registering the domain for the 5 day period after anyone does a search for the name, making anyone who wants the domain only buy it through them for the 5 days. If after 5 days noone wants it, then NSI can simply release the domain name and not pay a penny.

  27. ICANN SSAC looking for input on front running by vmxeo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just found this in the ICANN Front-running paper. Note the contact email at the end...

    For each instance of suspected domain name front running, the type of information that would be most useful in studying the case includes but is not limited to:

    Method used to check domain name availability (e.g., web browser, application).

    Local access ISP.

    Provider or operator of the availability checking service.

    Dates and times when domain name availability checks were performed.

    Copy of the information returned (e.g., WHOIS query response) in the response to the availability check.

    Whether the domain name was reported as previously registered or never before registered in the response returned from the availability check.

    Copy of the information returned (e.g., WHOIS query response) indicating the name had been registered.

    Copies of any correspondence sent to or received from the registrant perceived to be a front runner.

    Correspondence with the registrar or availability checking service.

    Any information indicating a potential relationship between the availability checking service and the registrant that grabbed the name.

    Please submit incidents to the SSAC Fellow at SSAC-DNFR@ICANN.org.

  28. LOL by cromar · · Score: 4, Funny

    All of a sudden Whois.net seems to be loading much more slowly. I wonder what could be happening!

  29. Re:weren't we just complaining a few weeks ago.. by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...about domains being tasted by spammers etc. that then would try to sell them to you at inflated costs?

    In some ways this is a lot better, so if I have an idea for a domain, go register it at NSI, get sidetracked, go back the next day, the domain would still be available and not stolen by somebody sniffing the whois traffic etc.

    As long as network solutions is upfront with this practise I think it could definitely be spun as a positive vs a negative (check a domain here and you can be sure that you'll be able to register it for up to 5 days after, instead of risking it being stolen or held for ransom). Except if that is their intentions they're not doing it properly. After you perform the search they have a button "Add Domains To Order", that would signify the intention to purchase the domain, but NSI has already purchased it at that point. Or if they're actually concerned about sniffing packets they could taste it for only an hour or so until the user progresses further.

    Here's a test, try searching for a domain from one IP, then try going through the purchase process from another IP. How much do you wanna bet that NSI is more than happy to sell the domain to the different IP? Heck if two different people both have accounts have them search a domain name with one then step through the purchase with another, even with two conclusively different entities I'm sure they'll be happy to take the sale. Note there's no reason a spammer couldn't sniff the domain you searched for, then purchase it from NSI. If NSI doesn't restrict the purchase to the person who made the search they've done absolutely nothing to stop sniffers from stealing domains.
    --
    I stole this Sig
  30. Re:At 4:24 PM (EDT-US) by Tofystedeth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what you're saying is that in addition to the bot that one guy made to autoquery these domains, we should also make bots to give them heavy traffic for the next few days?

    --
    "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Drink deeply or not at all."
  31. Clarification from Network Solutions by shashib · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi my name is Shashi Bellamkonda and I work for Network Solutions. Aprreciate the opportunity to clarify. Here is a response on Circleid http://www.circleid.com/posts/81082_network_solutions_front_running/. Network Solutions is not front running. We've implemented a customer protection measure to help defend our customers against the actions of "front runners" or those persons who register domain names known to have been searched, for the purpose of monetizing them and then selling them at inflated prices either directly to the customer who searched for the domain or through aftermarket channels. The protection measure holds the searched domains at Network Solutions for up to 4 days so customers can take the time to decide whether registration of the domain name will help them build and protect their brand. Network Solutions is not registering these names at the end of the reservation period with the hope of selling them in the secondary market. Likewise, we're not placing any advertisements on these domains to monetize their traffic while they are in the reservation period.

    --
    Social Media Swami | Network Solutions | http://blog.networksolutions.com
    1. Re:Clarification from Network Solutions by Antibozo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the contrary, Network Solutions is effectively monetizing the domains by forcing buyers to purchase them at Network Solutions' inflated prices.

      Furthermore, this concept of protection would only make sense if you thought consumers were searching for a domain both on Network Solutions' lookup system and on that of an another unethical competitor. But why would consumers do that? One lookup is sufficient, and by definition, you know that one lookup occurred on your site, so it's already unlikely that a competitor will have the opportunity. The notion that you're protecting anyone doesn't wash.

  32. Re:At 4:24 PM (EDT-US) by Selivanow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So basically....don't use NSI for domain lookups. Use someone else. Maybe a company that won't try to screw you.

    --
    -- ...trying to make digital files uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet. -Bruce Schneier
  33. These domains are hosted on a wildcard DNS by kindbud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh brother! Another wildcard DNS server (not even RFC compliant, it returns a CNAME for every query, with no glue and no SOA, even when asked explicitly). These domains are parked on ns1. and ns2.reserveddomainname.com. All a spammer needs to do is search NSI for a domain, and it begins to resolve and can be used to spam.

    The following domains are installed on my anti-spam relays' caching nameservers as empty stub zones. It prevents my anti-spam relays from resolving any domains hosted on nameservers that live in these zones. It accounts for a very large percentage of blocked spam on my systems, and I recommend mail admins start blocking domains hosted on wildcard DNS servers. It's quick, easy, painless, and your content filter will thank you for easing its workload (if it could talk and had emotions, that is).

    cheap-dns-host.com
    domainservice.com
    fastpark.net
    namesdiscount24.net
    name-services.com
    names-service.com
    parked.com
    parkingsave.net
    reserveddomainname.com
    versans1.com
    versans2.com
    versans3.com
    versans4.com
    versans.com

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  34. Re:weren't we just complaining a few weeks ago.. by chihowa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How much do you wanna bet that NSI is more than happy to sell the domain to the different IP? Better than that, when you search for it they begin advertising it as for sale. They're perfectly willing to sell it to anybody, as long as they're the ones selling it.
    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  35. NSI doing Creative Commons Abuse, too! by schmiddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I Just followed the link to uselessdomain0001.com. Check out the blue globe logo at the top.. now check out this CC licensed SVG image on Wikipedia: Applications-internet.svg. Looks like someone "accidentally" forgot to include the Creative Commons Share Alike license on that page.. hmmmm.

    I think it's pretty obvious that NSI is just a scummy company, through and through.

    P.S. If uselessdomain0001.com has changed by the time you read this, just check out uselessdomain0002.com or any other similarly tasted domain.

    --
    http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search