Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Examine Dinosaur Skin

jd writes "Fossilized skin from a dinosaur in China is allowing paleontologists a better understanding of what dinosaur skin was like. A tear, caused by a predator, shows that below the scales of the Psittacosaurus was a thick hide comprised of 25 layers of collagen. Other than the multitude of layers, this is very similar in nature to modern shark skin. The gash caused by a predator allowed the skin and the soft interior to be fossilized along with the bones. This is not the same dinosaur that had been reported previously on Slashdot, which was found in South Dakota, although the process and extent of fossilization is very similar."

30 of 96 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Interesting by clsours · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, evolution isn't really all that good at creating new things, but is very good at retaining good designs.

    --
    Seagoon: Shut up Eccles!

    Eccles: Shut up Eccles!
  2. Food Nerd Alert by Misanthrope · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Imagine the amount of gelatin dinosaur stock would contain, it'd put veal shanks to shame.

    1. Re:Food Nerd Alert by iainl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apato-burgers, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  3. Suddenly? by shmackie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How was the flesh preserved, and not eaten by microbes?
    Suddenly covered by sediment seems like odd explanation.

    Like there was all of a sudden a large amount of water full of particulates put on top of this land dwelling animal. Then allowed to settle.
    Weird

    1. Re:Suddenly? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      How was the flesh preserved, and not eaten by microbes? Suddenly covered by sediment seems like odd explanation.

      If this was Trek, I would propose interference from tachyon particles as the culprit.

    2. Re:Suddenly? by RuBLed · · Score: 2, Funny

      How was the flesh preserved, and not eaten by microbes? Suddenly covered by sediment seems like odd explanation.
      The dinosaur was probably buried by his kin after his death. I'm sure the culprit was arrested afterwards and brought to justice...
    3. Re:Suddenly? by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may seem like an odd explanation, but keep in mind that fossils are ridiculously rare. If it weren't for freak accidents we wouldn't have any fossils at all.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:Suddenly? by micromuncher · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are lots of environmental conditions that can discourage decomposition. Cold, pressure, alkalinity, acidity, salinity, [lack of] humidity, etc. Think of bogs and bitumen (tar pits).

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  4. Duplisaurus Paranoidus by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is not the same dinosaur that had been reported previously on Slashdot

    Somebody's a bit sensitive about dupes ;-)

  5. Re:Interesting by Tatisimo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Reading the 'Origin of Species' gives great insight into those ideas. It's gives pretty interesting explanations (though a bit outdated) on why some species seem to revert to old forms (such as why whales look like fish), and why some useful features stay the same through the ages seemingly unchanged. Go on, get it and take it one idea at a time. It's available to everyone as a free audiobook or free text

    --
    Give Kashyyyk back to the Wookies
  6. Re:I was about to make that joke by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great, thanks! Cause every time someone jokes about creationism, God goes back to the Jurassic and kills a dinosaur!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  7. Oh, the fools! by mad-seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

    If only they'd built them with 26 layers!

    1. Re:Oh, the fools! by TuringTest · · Score: 2, Funny

      this is very similar in nature to modern shark skin If only they'd built them with 25 friggin lasers! (on their heads).
      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  8. Re:Interesting by gnick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well put - This is certainly interesting, but it would have been more surprising to learn that they had some completely different and unique skin structure. Sharks and many reptiles have been around a helluva long time because they're very well adapted to their niches.
    ---
    On a side note, I find it pleasantly surprising that Firefox's spell-check happily accepted 'helluva'.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  9. same as shark skin? by DreamerFi · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean we can mount a frikking laser on them?

  10. Re:Interesting by theMerovingian · · Score: 4, Funny


    A tear, caused by a predator, shows that below the scales of the Psittacosaurus was a thick hide comprised of 25 layers of collagen.

    It's like I always say, 25 layers of collagen just isn't enough if you can't outrun your predators.

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
  11. Re:I was about to make that joke by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Funny

    What do you think God was doing when dinosaurs are joking about creationism?

    Right... and we're clever indeed...

  12. Re:Interesting by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 4, Informative

    First, life has gone through BILLIONS of years, not just million. Secondly, mammals and reptiles are very closely related. And finaly, (almost ?) all multicellular species that existed in the last 2 billion years use collagen to make their cells stick together.

  13. Re:Interesting by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Funny

    More interesting is a question how much earlier than europeans chinese began fossilizing their dinosaurs

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  14. And to think... by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How wonderful to consider that this animal's descendants walk among us to this very day. Chubby, piggish little creatures. Omnivorous. Voracious. Almost invulnerable due to their incredibly tough skin. Scavenging when they must, picking off a vulnerable or unwary victim when they can.

    We call them "lawyers".

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  15. Re:Interesting by Morty · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's interesting to me that over the millions of years of evolution life has gone through, we're still using the same basic outlines for anatomy.

    100 million years is the recent past, in evolutionary terms. See the Timeline of evolution.
    Single-celled life evolved about 4 billion years ago. The even bigger leap to multi-celled life was 1 billion years ago. By 100 million years ago, we already had all the big developments except human brains: plants, fish, insects, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, birds, and flowers. So 100 million years ago isn't that old, in evolutionary terms.
  16. Yummy by El+Yanqui · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mmm.. spicy Psittacosaurus rinds.

    --
    Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.
  17. Re:Interesting by WiFiBro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Additionaly "Climbing Mount Improbable" by Richard Dawkins gives a great overview of the various eye in the animal kingdom. Interesting bits are how the eye apparently developed along several lines, and how a choice made early in evolution can hardly be undone, such as the blood vessels being in front of the retina in the eyes of vertrebrates. (Or wait, God did that to protect the retina.)

  18. Re:Interesting by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not surprising if you've ever been to a market in chinatown. They are very much into preserving animals of all kinds in as many ways as possible.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  19. The Fools! by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 2

    If only they'd built them with 26 layers!

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  20. Dakota by Cemu · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...which was found in South Dakota. North Dakota. The article previously covered was found in North Dakota. For those of you who have never been there before, there is a difference - not just geographically either.
  21. Re:Interesting by genner · · Score: 2, Funny

    No it's like saying I'm only days old.
    10,585 days to be exact.

  22. Re:Interesting by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Informative

    First, life has gone through BILLIONS of years, not just million. Secondly, mammals and reptiles are very closely related. And finaly, (almost ?) all multicellular species that existed in the last 2 billion years use collagen to make their cells stick together.

    That's a little misleading. Yes life has been around for billions of years but only primitive celled organisms and bacteria. Thefirst complex life including the first fishes, corals, trilobites and shellfish only appeared in the Cabrian period which started about 570 million years ago. Mammals and dinosaurs came much later.

    --
    Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  23. Re:Interesting by skeftomai · · Score: 2, Informative

    Creationist nonsense...marked interesting???

  24. Re:Interesting by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is incorrect. The first complex multicellular life (excluding various colonial bacteria and the like, which have been around a lot longer) appear in the Ediacaran period about 600-610 million years ago. It's an all-too-common myth that the Cambrian Explosion represents the origins of such life.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.