Slashdot Mirror


Games Industry Accused of 'Buying Political Clout'

A parent's group is lambasting the Electronic Software Association for announcing its intention to curry political favour in Washington DC. The games industry, for most of its life a much-maligned business sector, has just begun to work towards changing its image with US lawmakers. The Parents Television Council views this as attempting to 'buy influence in Congress', and views the ESA's plans harshly: "'The videogame industry continues to fight meaningful accountability for selling inappropriate material to children. The industry has been exposed repeatedly for its reprehensible behavior and now they are looking for ways to buy friends in the government,' said PTC President Tim Winter. 'Let me be clear of our intentions: Any public servant who cashes a check from the videogame industry will be exposed by the PTC as taking a stand against families, and his or her actions will be communicated to constituents in his or her congressional district.'" I wonder how they feel about lobbying by conservative 'pro-family' groups?

21 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. Welcom to the club by Boronx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder how they feel about lobbying by conservative 'pro-family' groups?

    Or every other business sector that has felt the weight of legislative attention.

  2. Oh bullshit. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What, so it's only a bad thing when the gaming industry does it, and not when every other lobby in the universe does it?

    Screw it. They tried to do it the right way, using reason, and compromise, and common sense, and it didn't work. So now, screw it, they're going to play the game, and it turns out that gaming is a fricking huge industry, and they can blow a ton of money on legislation that is favorable to them.

    So now all the "Think of the Children" politicos are going to have to decide whether they want to keep pretending that they actually care, or whether they want money. Pretty much a no brainer.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Oh bullshit. by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As little as people may like it, the only way that the games industry can get a "positive" message in edgewise is through paid lobbyists. As it is, the only message that most politicians are likely to hear is "games are evil" because the groups that are pushing that message are very well organized.

    2. Re:Oh bullshit. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An honest politician is one who stays bought. Frankly, it's about time the games industry started using its money to bribe the Congresscritters. The Uptight Christians Brigade has been doing it for years, and getting in the way of everybody who just wants to kick back and enjoy the only life any of us are going to get.

  3. Duh. by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone buys political clout, that's how the system works. Lobbying = legalized bribery. So I wonder, how much has the Parent's Television Council donated to various congresspeople?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Duh. by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Funny

      So I wonder, how much has the Parent's Television Council donated to various congresspeople? The technical term for them is congresscritters. If you call them people, others might get the wrong idea and expect things like morals out of them.
      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    2. Re:Duh. by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      I dunno... "congresscritters" sounds sort of cute and fuzzy, and reminds me of this show.

      Just call them what they really are, a term that leaves no room for misunderstanding the nature of the evil that they spread across the earth. "Mostly lawyers."

  4. They have every right to be upset by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The PTC has every right to be upset. An industry they're bullying has decided it's had enough and is fighting back. Once the gaming industry gets political PTC will have to find somebody else to pick on.

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
  5. Arseholes, basically by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'The videogame industry continues to fight meaningful accountability for selling inappropriate material to children.

    Can people stop using the word conservative to describe these groups? One of the cornerstones of conservatism is the belief in personal responsibility, and that includes taking responsibility as a parent, not sitting back and blaming the entertainment industry like some junkie approportioning the blame for his actions onto society.
    If you can't be bothered to make the effort to learn what your children are doing, and enforce whatever rules you consider appropriate for your house, then you have no business complaining. A console/TV/computer is not a surrogate parent, and the games industry is not to blame if you've given your children a TV and Xbox360 in their room to shut them up.

    --
    If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    1. Re:Arseholes, basically by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've seen "conservatives" take the principle of "personal responsibility" to the point of blaming people rear-ended in car accidents for having made the decision to get out on the highway.

      No, what you've got there is an Objectivist. :-)

    2. Re:Arseholes, basically by Alsee · · Score: 2, Informative

      No true Scotsman.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. New Government Program for Protection of Children by Free_Meson · · Score: 5, Funny

    The videogame industry continues to fight meaningful accountability for selling inappropriate material to children. The industry has been exposed repeatedly for its reprehensible behavior and now they are looking for ways to buy friends in the government,' said PTC President Tim Winter. 'Let me be clear of our intentions: Any public servant who cashes a check from the videogame industry will be exposed by the PTC as taking a stand against families, and his or her actions will be communicated to constituents in his or her congressional district.

    I'd like to announce a new program to help screen inappropriate material from children. Tentatively titled the "Federal Universal Child Kinship Oversight and Family Force Act" or F.U.C.K.O.F.F. Act for short. This act empowers the states to appoint guardians over minors based on whatever criteria they find reasonable, though it is expected that minors will be assigned based on a matching of their genetic makeup to that of available guardians. These guardians will be allowed to control the media the minor is exposed to, including but not limited to internet, television, radio, video games, and print media. It is the hope of Congress that this formal delegation will clarify the role of the government in the care of minors.

    Sincerely,

    -Ron Paul
  7. What about the RIAA by KevMar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where is the public out cry against the RIAA?

    The RIAA pulls people in to court instead of generating income. They attack our children and grandparents and threaten to take away our childrens college assistance. Yet the public dont care. Us slashdotters understand it, but the people that should care don't.

    --
    Im a gamer, not a grammer major. This post is full of spelling and grammer mistakes.
  8. "Market Forces" by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    And why not? That clout is for sale!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  9. Logical Fallacy by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I notice how everyone is suddenly becoming defensive and apologetic. "Everyone else does it too" is not an excuse. You already know this -- it's almost cliche now -- and yet we still find people who will excuse the behavior of any corporation with "Meh. It's a corporation. That's what corporations do."

    But that's not why I'm posting. Actually, I find a sense of gratification -- one could even call it glee -- that for once, I'm on the side of the corporations, who are lobbying for something I want, rather than being the "little guy" screaming at the top of his lungs, wishing desperately that he was relevant.

    And that's not why I'm posting, either. I am posting because of this outright fallacy quoted in the summary:

    Let me be clear of our intentions: Any public servant who cashes a check from the videogame industry will be exposed by the PTC as taking a stand against families, and his or her actions will be communicated to constituents in his or her congressional district.

    Oh, I get it. You're with us, or you're with the terrorists.

    Look, am I the only one who sees more possibilities here? If I was trying to get ahead politically, why wouldn't I cash a check from anyone? It's not as if the money itself is tainted. The MPAA could pay me all they want, and I would still legislate against them, not for them. They can threaten to pull funding -- fine, I'll use the last of their own money to buy some ads, exposing how they essentially tried to bribe/blackmail me into writing legislation for them. A message of "I'm doing the right thing, even if it costs me money" should serve to get me re-elected, right?

    It would be much more relevant to ask what that check was for, and to actually look at what that particular public servant does. People who cash checks from the MPAA do tend to write stuff like the DMCA. Are people cashing checks from the videogame industry any more or less likely to write censorship legislation?

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  10. pro family? by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is Pro family another word for 'don't do anything that would make baby jesus cry' or something?
    Good grief. I have a family, I'm reasonably sure I'm pro it, and I like games as they are. If somethings too violent I just don't buy it, end of problem. Do I need someone esle to tell me? Nope, I have a brain.

    Remember when Hollywood started to think that any decent film had to have sex scenes in it? I mean the eighties and early nineties. They weren't legislated into stopping it, although there were the same pressure groups doing the rounds. It was a bums on seats problem. People weren't interested, so they didn't pay for the film, so they dropped the sex thing. There's only been one scene with sex scenes in it that I've enjoyed in recent years, and that's 'Free Enterprise'. There wasn't exactly much in that either. Ok Clerks 2 as well, but that was a donkey....um, bad example...

    If people don't buy enough of the violent games, they'll stop making them, its simple business economics. If they keep on buying them, there's obviously a market, and it will be supplied, no matter what die hard 'pro family' bods say.

  11. I can't take it anymore by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is there a real life Galt's Gultch out there? Is there some place where all the self reliant and independent people went? Where all the people who take responsibility for themselves went to live a better life? A place where someone suggesting the formation of a group called the Parents Television Council would be looked at like a mentally ill person?

    Can I come? I gots mad tech skillz. Please? I'll work really hard. Anything to GET ME THE FUCK OUT OF THIS FUCKING CESSPOOL OF NITWITS THE REST OF THE WORLD HAS BECOME!

  12. Ya know what pisses me off the most? by 7Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that PTC isn't actually what they say they are. They're not a "child friendly" group trying to work with the game industry to get concensus on gaming... they're an anti-video game lobby group who thinks that video games are evil and are out to destroy the industry. They remind me of religious pro-abstinance groups who masquerade as birth-control education.

    I'm personally fairly opposed to video game violence, as I am with TV and cinema... I don't think it's healthy for our culture in general (regardless of age, actually). But I'm also in favor of consensus building, and different interests working together toward the common good. The PTC has shown that they are not trying to build a better game industry, they are trying to tear it apart completely.

    Basically, this gesture says "We can lobby, but they can't, because they're inherently evil". At that point, no reasoning or compromise can be made, we're now in the realm of idiology and theology. Basically, PTC has just declared financial holy war on the game industry.

    I consider myself a pacifist... but in this case, let the war begin.

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  13. It's totally unfair by Aggrav8d · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gaming experts gaming the system? They have way too much experience, they'll run circles around their competitors! At the very least lobbyists should have to get past some kind of jumping puzzle to reach the senate, only to be told their congressman is in another office.

  14. Re:Welcome to the club by KillerCow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Parents Television Council views this as attempting to 'buy influence in Congress'


    As apposed to what they do...
  15. Only one way to deal with this.. by knavel · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's only one way to deal with nutjobs that are so far removed from reality...Respond with an equally removed from reality response. And how pray tell do we, the tech community, do such a thing? By using technology to our advantage. I'm sure someone else remembers Scott Pakin's famous complaint letter generator:

    http://www.pakin.org/complaint

    And a quick search over the PTC's site reveals the email for "Letters to the Editor":

    editor@parentstv.org

    Now go forth, my tech brethren, and fight crazy with crazy!