Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Claim Infrared Helmet Could Reverse Alzheimer's Symptoms

penguin_dance writes "Ready to put on your thinking cap? There's a report out of the UK regarding an 'experimental helmet which scientists say could reverse the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease within weeks of being used'. The helmet is to be worn for ten minutes every day and stimulates the growth of brain cells using infra-red light. The article explains, 'Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair. It is able to penetrate the skin and even get through the skull.' Human trials are due to start this summer." I wont make any nomad-based predictions, but I'll remain on the skeptic side of the fence for now.

27 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Spaceballs The Helmet! by Zymergy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seeing the linked article's image of the 3 Doctor's holding their experimental "Prototype Cognitive Helmet", I can't help but imagine one of them wearing it while reenacting Rick Moranis' doll-play monologue from Spaceballs:

    [Playing with his dolls]
    Dark Helmet: [In Dark Helmet voice] And now Princess Vespa, I have you in my clutches, to have my wicked way with you, the way I want to.
    [In Vespa voice]
    Dark Helmet: No, no, go away, I hate you! And yet... I find you strangely attractive.
    [In D.H. voice]
    Dark Helmet: Of course you do! Druish princesses are often attracted to money and power, and I have both, and you *know* it!
    [In V. voice]
    Dark Helmet: No, no, leave me alone!
    [In D.H. voice]
    Dark Helmet: No, kiss me!
    [V]
    Dark Helmet: No! Stop!
    [D.H]
    Dark Helmet: Yes, yes!
    [V]
    Dark Helmet: Oh, oh, oh! Ohhhh, your helmet is so big!

  2. My only question... by thatseattleguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it work even if I'm wearing my tinfoil hat?

  3. Sunlight? by teeleton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So how is this helmet different from just walking around in the sunshine? It's not like there isn't any infra-red light in ordinary sunlight.

    1. Re:Sunlight? by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Assuming that you live in a place with a regular, consistent source of sunshine.
      Plus older people tend to avoid the sun, as they can't stand the heat / brightness, quite apart from the cancer risks...

      Still, on a lighter note:

      Doctor: I'm sorry, Mr Smith, but your wife's symptoms match either Alzheimer's or AIDS.
      Smith: *gasp* What can I do, Doc?
      Dr: Well, I suggest you take her into town, and leave here there. If she finds her way home, wear a condom!

    2. Re:Sunlight? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how is this helmet different from just walking around in the sunshine? It's not like there isn't any infra-red light in ordinary sunlight.

      The difference is that Virulite (the company who makes the helmet) doesn't get paid when you just walk around in the sun.

  4. Foil, then bake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If infrared will penetrate the skull? Then people in sunny climates should have lessor incidents of the disease?

  5. So... the next logical question is... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Won't it work even better on those of us who don't have the Alzheimer's, yet?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  6. head warmer? by Raptoer · · Score: 2, Funny

    It shines a light on your head in the infrared spectrum... which is basically heat radiation... So it's a head warmer?

    I know IR has more things than heat associated with it, but still... its a head warmer!

  7. Skeptical and yet... by SquierStrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My father has Alzheimer's. Most Alzheimer's patients are very kind and sweet but my father is so bitter that he is always angry because at 55 he realizes his brain is slowly killing him. His short term memory is nil. He walks especially slow and his communication is getting poorer. He was diagnosed in October 2005 and he was showing symptoms before that.

    Frankly, This is an illustration of why our process of developing medications is ridiculous. This may not work (though I resent that "wontwork" tag) but frankly there are at least 3 very promising treatments for Alzheimer's Disease in early trials. But because of the length and the way trials work, if they are successful none of them will emerge from trials early enough to help my father. And frankly, he and my family would be willing to try anything to help him. And in the end the worse outcome is that he doesn't get better. But we will never know. 10 years from now Alzheimer's may be no worse than severe diabetes, MS, Crohn's Disease or what have you: controllable, not curable with a quality of life equivalent to most other people. But because we would rather not kill a dying person to find out if we'll kill them or save them, my father will never get benefit of this.

    --
    Derek Greene
    1. Re:Skeptical and yet... by ilikepi314 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh come on; if one of your family members was given a vaccine and a weekly later developed some severe disease and died (even if they were already dying!), you would again go with the "deliberate malevolence" argument and probably sue someone.

      Sorry, didn't mean to direct that toward you, this was actually meant to be a more general societal thing. Until people get over their sue-happy kick lately, all government entities are going to tread softly, I imagine, particularly those directly related to public health. People have sued for much less than rushing a medicine to market (coffee being hot comes to mind), so can you really blame them? Legal battles drain money from what could have funded more medicine research, etc.

      However, a serious question to the parent especially: do you know how to sign up for the trials, is it too late? Someone somewhere has to be taking it or it wouldn't be a trial. I've never signed up for something like that, so I don't know what the process is and am partially asking out of curiosity myself.

    2. Re:Skeptical and yet... by oncehour · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The McDonalds Coffee incident != Frivilous. Quit eating the dogfood and research the actual facts. The coffee was knowingly and neglectfully above safe levels for hours.

      I will grant that we are a sue happy society, but there's a reason for that. Being an American who's lived in Canada for a couple years I'm noticing there's a lot more government support and government agencies here. The government regulates the corporations so the average Canadian doesn't even need to think of suing. In the US on the other hand, the government tends to be a bit more laissez-faire except when they want to increase barriers of entry for their friends in the industry, and as such the people are the ones that regulate the industry.

      Lawsuits are a form of regulation. Lawyers suing companies for being dickheads is actually noble behavior. I think too many people buy into the "sue-happy" stereotype without considering why it exists. Given the power of lobbying, lawsuits are the only thing that really keeps industry in check by the people.

    3. Re:Skeptical and yet... by AngelofDeath-02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except it actually works the other way around ...
      Corporations have bottomless wallets while the people don't. Your best bet is a class action lawsuit that returns almost nothing per individual, while the corporations can sue you instead.
      I cite the RIAA and the sony rootkit incident.

      Anyway, I see your point, but it's a two way street. Those with money can, and some do, abuse the system. In doing so, they ruin its reputation.

      --
      No, I am not an English major. My posts are subject to typos and incorrect grammar. Do not expect perfection.
    4. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, actually, the mcdonald's coffee case WAS entirely frivolous and a complete mockery of the court system

      Coffee is supposed to be brewed HOT. It is supposed to be served HOT. You spill HOT SHIT on you, and you GET BURNT.

      That woman was sold a cup of coffee that was somewhere between 180-190 F. That's hot, sure. Starbucks sells hotter coffee -- actually the crap sold by starbucks is FAR too hot to drink and tastes like it's been overroasted and brewed too hot and kept too hot for too long, but nobody goes to starbucks to buy a cup of drip coffee. That's another rant.

      Coffee is ideally brewed at 200 F. It's best served very soon after brewing. That means.. it's going to be hot. Very hot. Ideally, again, somewhere between..

      oh god, how can this be? Somewhere between 180-190 F.

      Here's a question. Do you think a reasonable person would expect to be burnt if they spilled coffee on themselves? Hey I'll give you the answer. It's "yes". If there was a reasonable expectation that coffee would NOT burn you, the woman would have a case.

      Fact of the matter is that the coffee was brewed and served correctly and the best thing to do is NOT FUCKING SPILL COFFEE ON YOURSELF AND BLAME SOMEONE ELSE.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    5. Re:Skeptical and yet... by roadsider · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, actually the lawsuit was NOT frivolous. It was actually an exercise in corporate comeuppance.

      The woman, who was elderly and rather frail, originally asked McDonalds to reimburse her for her medical bills incurred for treating second degree burns. While it may be necessary to BREW coffee at 205 degrees, it is not necessary (or prudent) to keep it on the warmer at that temperature, which McDonalds was doing.

      The woman only brought the suit after McDonalds refused her request to compensate her medical bills. Pissed off by McDonald's stonewalling, the jury awarded punitive damages of well over $2 million. This was later reduced to just under half a million.

      The 81 year old woman suffered THIRD DEGREE BURNS because McDonald's kept their coffee 20 degrees hotter than most other restaurants. They were punished because they were irresponsible and arrogant. I remember when I used to buy coffee at McDonald's how hot their coffee was compared to other places I frequented. They deserved what they got.

      According to Wikipedia:

      Liebeck sought to settle with McDonald's for US $20,000 to cover her medical costs, which were $11,000, but the company offered only $800. When McDonald's refused to raise its offer, Liebeck retained Texas attorney Reed Morgan. Morgan filed suit in a New Mexico District Court accusing McDonald's of "gross negligence" for selling coffee that was "unreasonably dangerous" and "defectively manufactured." McDonald's refused Morgan's offer to settle for $90,000.[4]

      Morgan offered to settle for $300,000, and a mediator suggested $225,000 just before trial, but McDonald's refused these final pre-trial attempts to settle.[4]

      McDonald's refused to settle perhaps because, though there had been numerous lawsuits alleging that hot coffee was "defectively manufactured," courts had consistently dismissed the cases before trial on the grounds that coffee burns were an open and obvious danger.

      This was also reported in the Wall Street Journal. See:

      http://www.reedmorganpc.com/wsj_coffee.htm

      Frivolous, my ass.

  8. Symptoms may be reversed in minutes--not weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Another therapy reported in Science Daily shows reversal of Alzheimer's symptoms in minutes, rather than weeks

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080109091102.htm

    From the article:

    "An extraordinary new scientific study, which for the first time documents marked improvement in Alzheimer's disease within minutes of administration of a therapeutic molecule, has just been published in the Journal of Neuroinflammation.

    "This new study highlights the importance of certain soluble proteins, called cytokines, in Alzheimer's disease. The study focuses on one of these cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF), a critical component of the brain's immune system. Normally, TNF finely regulates the transmission of neural impulses in the brain. The authors hypothesized that elevated levels of TNF in Alzheimer's disease interfere with this regulation. To reduce elevated TNF, the authors gave patients an injection of an anti-TNF therapeutic called etanercept. Excess TNF-alpha has been documented in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer's.

    "The new study documents a dramatic and unprecedented therapeutic effect in an Alzheimer's patient: improvement within minutes following delivery of perispinal etanercept, which is etanercept given by injection in the spine. Etanercept (trade name Enbrel) binds and inactivates excess TNF. Etanercept is FDA approved to treat a number of immune-mediated disorders and is used off label in the study."

  9. But seriously, the weather by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    An 80-year-old couple is having trouble remembering things, so they go
                    to the doctor to make sure there's nothing wrong.
                    After an exam, the doctor says, "You're physically okay, but you guys
                    might want to start writing notes to help you remember things."
                    That night they're watching TV when the old man gets up from his chair.
                    His wife says, "Where are you going?"
                    He says, "I'm going to the kitchen to get a glass of water."
                    She says, "Will you get me some Vanilla ice cream?"
                    He says, "All right."
                    She says, "Don't you think you should write it down?"
                    He says, "I don't have to write it down. Vanilla ice cream."
                    She says, "And could I have strawberries and whipped cream?"
                    He says, "All right."
                    She says, "Don't you think you should write it down?"
                    He says, "I don't have to write it down.Vanilla ice cream with
                    strawberries and whipped cream."
                    Twenty minutes later he walks in and hands her a plate of bacon and eggs.
                    She says, "You forgot my fucking toast."

    --
    What?
  10. Weasel words ftw... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...an 'experimental helmet which scientists say could reverse the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease..."

    "Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair..."

    I guess I'm just a cynical bastard now, but having weasel words in a story like this whispers, "snake oil" or, "wishful thinking" to me. Maybe it's because all the people selling quack stuff are careful about how they say things for legal reasons, and now I put too much effort into scrutinizing how medical claims are worded. Call me when it's actually curing Alzheimers in a no-shit, double-blind, randomized study with more than a handful of participants.

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    1. Re:Weasel words ftw... by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess I'm just a cynical bastard now, but having weasel words in a story like this whispers, "snake oil" or, "wishful thinking" to me.

      Uh, they're scientists engaging in very preliminary research, and you're criticizing them because they're being honest about how experimental it is? They aren't making any medical claims whatsoever. They're just basically saying "we found this interesting result in rats, let's see if it also applies to humans."

      Call me when it's actually curing Alzheimers in a no-shit, double-blind, randomized study with more than a handful of participants.

      Well yes, I'm sure if their next stage of research confirms their findings, that's the eventual plan. We'll be sure to call you when their research is complete.

  11. But... by hyades1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will it help me remember what I actually wanted when I went down the steps to the basement?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  12. Re:Not a scientist but ... by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does infrared light have the ability to pass through the skull ?... sounds like snake oil to me... I'll stick with my pyramid hat.

    Yes, infrared light can pass through the skull. In fact, there's a technique called fNIR (functional near-infrared spectroscopy) which uses a system of IR emitters and detectors to measure brain activity. Some links:

    http://www.lab-times.org/methods/m_07_03.html

    http://www.biomed.drexel.edu/fnir/Contents/brain_imaging/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FNIR

  13. Re:Selection pressure for baldness by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe hair BLOCKS infra-red light in sunlight

    Apparently the white hair on polar bears acts like optic fibre. It collects light over a larger surface than the bare skin of the animal and channels it to the body to keep it warm.

  14. a lot harder than it sounds by alizard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    from one of the company's press releases:

    I have spent the last 10 years working with Dr Gordon Dougal, medical doctor and scientist, exploring the effects of infra red light on living cells. We started off using cold sores (herpes simplex) as a clinical model to search for a therapeutic waveband of light within the infrared spectrum. After treating many hundreds of cold sores, and utilising basic scientific principles with the help of Durham University, we were successful in identifying 1072nm wavelength light to be therapeutic with properties antagonistic to harmful ultra-violet light.


    Tried finding 1072nm near-IR emitters lately?

    I just spent 10 minutes searching, the stuff I've seen tops out at about 880 nm.
    1. Re:a lot harder than it sounds by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, and your google-fu is lacking, Sir, because a brief search of my normal LED suppliers gave me this: http://www.roithner-laser.com/LED_diverse.htm which admittedly is 1070nm (2.5mW) nominal output rather than 1072nm. However, given that it's minimum is 1020 and it's maximum 1120 i'd say you're gonna be getting a fairly hefty amount of 1072nm light out of it. I notice they also do a high-power (like 150mW) LED panel which radiates at 1050nm (peak 1000~1100nm), which again isn't right on the money but is gonna give you enough to trial, given that they were talking about this clinical trial dosing patients with about the same amount of IR as regular sunlight. Granted these diodes don't come cheap, with the quoted price for the 1070nm LED being about $20 each, which given the number you'd want could get pretty expensive. But then, what cost is health?

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
  15. Reminder by phorm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry about that, I can remind you...

    Your last words before doing so were "mom, I'm going back to my room now" :-)

  16. Re:I've heard this before......... by El+Torico · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We age because our cells lose the desire to regenerate and repair themselves."

    I have this image of brain cells getting depressed and just hanging around, slowly degenerating.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  17. A bit optimistic by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The wide publicity given to this report is probably unfortunate, given how many people are desperate for a cure.
    Key points:
    This is a case study of one patient.
    Treatment was not double blinded. Patient's family and doctor knew about the treatment.
    From the paper, the degree of improvement sounds a bit short of complete reversal of symptoms

    Upon returning to the clinic one week following perispinal etanercept administration for his weekly dose the patient's wife and son confirmed that he had remained markedly clinically improved throughout the week, a fact which was remarked upon by the family [see Additional file 1]. He was noticed to be less reluctant to join in conversation. On re-examination by author ET prior to repeat dosing one week after the initial dose, the patient correctly identified the year, month, season, day of week and state. He appeared to answer with less frustration, and the examiner's impression was that there was reduced latency of response, and his affect seemed improved. On the FAS test for verbal fluency when asked to list all of the words that start with the letter F in 60 seconds he listed 8 words, and named 5 animals in 60 seconds. The study author has a patent on this treatment strategy.

    Severity of Alzheimer's dementia can vary dramatically from day to day, and many patients show periods of near-complete lucidity.

    I can't help wondering how much etanercept (it is a large protein) is getting into the brain when administered in this way.

    It is widely suspected that Alzheimer's Disease has an inflammatory component, so the approach is not unreasonable, but I worry about large number of patients' families demanding etanercept based on this very preliminary work.
  18. Fascinating Captain. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently the white hair on polar bears acts like optic fibre. It collects light over a larger surface than the bare skin of the animal and channels it to the body to keep it warm.

    Never heard of this before. Too bad it's not true and you are propagating another "urban myth" (although Polar Bears aren't especially urban).

    Thanks for playing.

    And now back to our regularly scheduled program.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!