Slashdot Mirror


A Mythbuster's Biggest Tech Headaches (and Solutions)

An anonymous reader writes "The Mythbusters' Jamie Hyneman shares his top tech annoyances. Hyneman runs down the little things that bug him about everything from tools (exotic chargers) to cars (useless features). He also notes that there's a lot of room for improvement on PC desktops: 'In addition to being buggy ... extra features tend to bog down your system by demanding more processing power and memory. Computer-makers: Don't load up operating systems with features and then make us sweat to figure out how to get rid of the fat ... There's another solution available to consumers: Switch to a Linux-based OS such as Ubuntu. Since most Linux OSs are free, there's no business reason to bloat up the system with feature frills.'"

40 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. No offence, by pwnies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But it seems like this is just a fairly famous person telling us what we already know. Nothing new or insightful here IMHO.

    1. Re:No offence, by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention the article's free of any "fixes" promised in the first paragraph. The best we get is "it should be like this!" Uh, yeah, it should, but got anything more practical?

      I love Jamie and Adam, but he needs to realize that engineering!=profits, hence all these annoyances.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:No offence, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, no, not to a geek. But the general public might find some of it enlightening.

      Also, it's kind of nice to get support for this kind of view from a celebrity. It's like "no, you're not crazy. Jamie Hyneman Agrees!!".

      I am in total agreement with his stance on Vista for example. (I find it almost hilarious that MS now includes a movie editor, MSN, media this and media that, but still doesn't provide a decent text editor.)

    3. Re:No offence, by SQLGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you want devices to be single function, always look for the ones endorsed by the AARP.

      Layne

    4. Re:No offence, by samkass · · Score: 4, Funny

      And ironically, I had to click away a jumping JavaScript pop-in window in order to see the page talking about bloat and loading up an interface with crap.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    5. Re:No offence, by king-manic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Personally, I think that's one of the iPhone's "sleeper" features that hasn't really been touted. There are by now tens of millions of iPod docking ports, docking cables, adapters, etc., around. IMHO, all phones should just pay Apple some minimal sum and standardize on the iPod port for their recharge/data cables. In the meantime, the iPhone is the only phone you can take virtually anywhere on the planet and borrow a cable from someone to recharge it. (of course, it would be nice if it could get service anywhere on the planet for reasonable money, but that's another story.) I think my mini-USB on my motorola Q does that job just fine. Charging, docking, syncing etc... Why not standardize that (most smart phones use that anyway). I think it's less a sleeper feature and more "Apple going it's own way" or "monolithic megalomaniac corporation attempting to force new standards down our throats a la Sony".
      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    6. Re:No offence, by mal3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You must have gotten that Motorola Q from someone other than Verizon. If you plug a regular USB cable into a Verizon phone(my old RAZR), you get an "Unauthorized Charger" message. They may have changed since then, but you can't be certain that just because the plug is standard the charger is too.

      --
      Non gratis rodentus anus
    7. Re:No offence, by nwf · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm with you -- mini and micro USB is much more standard than the iPod and there's no reason Apple couldn't have used USB instead. It would've possibly cost more, sure, so they did something proprietary like everyone else.

      In fact, there is. Getting L+R audio and video can't be done via USB and plug it into a stereo and/or TV with minimal electronics. Plus, there are ways to remote control the iPod via the connector, although I suspect that could be done via USB pretty easily.

      I don't think they even had micro USB when the iPod came out, either.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
  2. Shame he didn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..share it on his TV show, where it might have mattered. Posting it here is just preaching to the choir, so to speak.

    1. Re:Shame he didn't... by sjaguar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What we need to do is to get a whole bunch of people to write in to see some PC myths.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
    2. Re:Shame he didn't... by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, he "posted" it to Popular Mechanics, a magazine frequently read by people who will understand the issue, but may not have encountered Vista or Linux before.

  3. Bloat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since most Linux OSs are free, there's no business reason to bloat up the system with feature frills.

    But Mandriva have never let a little thing like that stand in their way.

    1. Re:Bloat? by yoyhed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since most Linux OSs are free, there's no business reason to bloat up the system with feature frills.
      Are you kidding me? I've always thought that the eyes that follow your mouse around were an essential feature to an OS.
      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
  4. Adam by cruff · · Score: 5, Funny

    I though for sure his top tech annoyance would have been Adam Savage. :-)

  5. And another thing. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about web articles that have more words than ads. Come on. This paragraph-at-a-time stuff is more annoying than even Vista.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  6. So if Jamie represents Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and Adam seems to like Apple, who gets Microsoft?

    My guess is Buster.

    1. Re:So if Jamie represents Linux... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think Buster's had a chair thrown at him just yet.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  7. Corrected for him... by InsaneMosquito · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I want to be nagged in my car, I'll bring my wife.

  8. Things will be getting simpler, and are already. by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All my phones in recent years use a USB port to charge. My new iMate Ultimate 6150 does, my previous HTC Trinity did, my wife's Motorola phones do. I won't buy a phone without a USB port to charge with. We carry around a small AA charger that has a USB port on it to charge devices on the go, it works great for long flights or any sort of travel away from a USB port.

    In my car I tossed the 12V "cigarette lighter" from the dash to the truck. I also increased its power from a small 5A fuse to a 10A fuse, so I can run a reasonably sized 120V inverter (also in the trunk) to power a few devices on-the-go.

    In the place of the dash 12V adapter, I installed a nice custom panel with 3 USB ports. They're high power ports, so I can charge a phone, a GPS receiver, and a plethora of other devices that use USB to charge. In the future I'd like to connect one port to a radio so I can play music on-the-go without my iPod.

    In the past, I've had relatively complicated small PCs to run my music system, but I'm seeing more and more options for in-vehicle PCs running Linux. Eventually I think we'll see a system that works well and is cheap. Since we only buy used cars, tossing the radio is one of the first things we do, and it's at most a loss of maybe $25 worth of electronics.

    There are many things I wish were modernized, standardized, and more open. First, vehicle information is very proprietary. Why is it that cars can't report status information via a simple USB connection? All the information is either there, or could be generated VERY cheaply. I ran out of wiper fluid two days ago (lots of snow in Chicago lately), and I sat there thinking how lame it is that the wiper fluid reservoir doesn't have a simple sensor to detect low fluid (it's a 2001 vehicle, not THAT old). Even that could be transported across a USB chain with regular updates. Heck, a $2 sensor could even sense fluid at 3 levels. Simple enough.

    At home, we have a DC run throughout the house wherever we upgraded our power, and I'm seriously thinking of changing it to USB charging. AC in the home is useful, but so many devices use DC (and the dreaded overheating wall-warts!) that I'm shocked that more devices aren't standardizing on DC. 18V, 5A+, not a big deal -- but so many devices could use it (charging tools, video games, cell phones, even some computer monitors). Simple, without needed ANOTHER heat-generating and wasting transformer. My laptop is DC, too, yet I need the darned transformer throughout the house.

    But I still see more and more devices standardizing in many ways. Over time, manufacturers are seeing that power is a commodity, not a profit maker. I tell my friends and family to stop buying products that use proprietary charging hardware. With tools, the battery situation is frustrating, but I think we'll see some changes there. I like the idea of having a standard 6V pack, and just adding more if you need 12V or 18V. Even better would be a "serial/parallel" switch so you could go from 6V 1A to 6V 2A or 12V 1A with the flip of a switch. Ahh, to dream.

  9. Re:Obligatory... by chubs730 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't even count on my two hands the girls I know personally who are as good if not better looking than she is.
    This is to be expected, it can be difficult to stretch a value of zero across ten fingers.
  10. There is a business reason for crap software!! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason is that they get paid to install crap software on your computer!

    Remember when the promise of cable TV was that you wouldn't have to watch commercials because you were already paying for TV? That didn't last long... the promise was broken and now you pay for TV service *AND* you have to watch commercials.

    You pay for magazines and news papers and with the exception of consumer reports (at least that was the case in the past) you get commercial ads in there too!

    It seems no business can resist the temptation to sell their customer's eyes to advertisers and other parties. It's a very bad business practice and one that eats at the trust that customers have with their vendors and service providers. But it's so common place these days that to do otherwise would be an exception rather than the rule. It's not an excuse for bad behavior, it's just a fact.

    Dell does a lot less of that than others and you can certainly request that anything be loaded or not loaded as well. But the average consumer doesn't know this and so they are victimized by having their computers compromised right out of the box.

    But there is a business reason for the extra crap-ware to be installed... they get money when they do it.

  11. non standard screws by artdwpmt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not specifically a tech issue, but affects numerous tech products as well.

    What really drives me nuts is non standard screws intended to prevent you from opening your device.
    (Unless of course you have the special magic screw driver.)

    I really hate these. I love opening things, to fix them or just for the fun of seeing how they're made.
    I bought it, it belongs to me, don't prevent me from trying to have a look inside if I want to.

  12. You've missed the point by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...because we're on Slashdot. We all know what Jamie is saying is true.

    But he's near-famous. He has a show that millions of people watch. And he's saying that Vista blows, and why it blows, and that Ubuntu kicks its ass.

    And he's saying it in Popular Mechanics. You see those everywhere. My barber has a rack of them by his waiting bench. So does my doctor. You see PM magazines all over a doctor's waiting area.

    It's called getting the word out.

    A lot of us here on /. complain about how Joe Sixpack has no clue about computer issues. Well - now Joe Sixpack has an opportunity to be sitting in a dentist's office, and see a PM magazine with Jamie on the cover and think "Hey cool - think I'll read that. That's the show where they blow stuff up. It'll be interesting to hear what he has to say."

    And suddenly he's exposed to the problems with Vista, and the joys of Ubuntu by a person he respects and likes. Maybe he'll call up his geeky cousin later on in the day on Jamie's recommendation and ask him what this Ubuntu thingy is.

    This is how mindshare happens. A war is a million little battles, and we just won one.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:You've missed the point by DariaM84 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree. Even for someone who's heard of Linux, sometimes the sheer number of distros out there can be overwhelming. Now this theoretical reader has a place to start.

    2. Re:You've missed the point by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that this is Ubuntu we are talking about. The Ubuntu forums are VERY newbie friendly, and very tightly moderated to eliminate forum trolls.

      Of course, if you had spent any time AT ALL on the Ubuntu forums, you would know that. The only people who generally don't get help are those that go in with a snotty, arrogant attitude. Although even they are OFFERED help, but their own attitude usually gets in the way of them being able to absorb it. I have myself been a Linux newbie, and have even recently, well out of my newbie stage, gotten stuck on an oddball issue now and again, and have always been able to find friendly and useful help on the Ubuntu forums.

      Honestly, that is what drew me to Ubuntu. While it is a very useful distro, I found the greatest draw was the near complete LACK of the classic Linux community snobbery that so often pervades web forums and IRC channels. Ubuntu users, particularly the more experienced ones, seem to be just generally nicer people.

      Of course, I have seen their moderators in action, and have seen flame posts vanish within moments of being posted. So I'm sure that a crack moderator staff has at least something to do with that. However, even THAT redounds well to Ubuntu. It shows that the community and Canonical understand that good PR is very often a key to success. And that the web forums are the Ubuntu community's public face. So they work hard to keep it looking good and working smoothly by stamping out any trolls and "cult of personality" types.

      Ok, I'll get off the fanboy soapbox for now. I guess I'm just saying that your point really has no merit, as it doesn't jibe with the reality of the Ubuntu forums that I have experienced on a regular basis.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  13. Deliberate by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of these annoyances are very deliberate. HDMI is intended to be non-interoperable and failure-prone. OEM Windows preloads contain extra bloatware because bloatware makers paid to have their crap installed. Tools use nonstandard battery packs, in order to sell proprietary replacement packs.

    These aren't engineering failures. They are just examples of products that are made to serve interests other than the user's.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Deliberate by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 3, Informative

      He wasn't describing them as "engineering failures." He was describing them as annoying or troublesome when used for his purposes. There is a big difference.

  14. Re:Obligatory... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kari is pretty much average.

    Granted, she's not Catherine Deneuve, but hot body+cute face+understanding of physics and engineering is not average, not by a long shot. Either you spend too much time in your basement or you're banging Playboy models on a regular basis.

    I'll leave it up to the reader to decide which is the most likely scenario ;)

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  15. a small 5A fuse to a 10A fuse by wiredog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope you upgraded the wiring. I have scars (well, one) from a wire that was undersized for the load. It started to melt. Across the fuel line...

  16. Well, if they ever get low on cash... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    It says of her on the Mythbusters website: Sculptor, painter, actor and one-time-only backside-model.

    I guess that was the airplane toilet episode. I wonder whatever happened to that model Jamie made...

    I can only imagine what that'd bring on eBay.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  17. Re:Geekgasm by berzerke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, I'm somewhat surprised Jamie mentioned Linux. I have noticed in some (past) shows they show a computer screen in a few camera shots and I recognized AOL. AOL is rarely the choice of the computer literate. Since Mythbusters seems to avoid product placements, I believe the fact I could spot AOL was more an accident than intentional. Haven't seen it lately though.

    Still, going from the choice of the not computer literate to talking about Linux as a desktop OS, in a non-computer tech magazine...that's a sign of progress. Is that another crack I hear forming in MS's empire?

  18. Re:Things will be getting simpler, and are already by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

    In my car I tossed the 12V "cigarette lighter" from the dash to the truck. I also increased its power from a small 5A fuse to a 10A fuse, so I can run a reasonably sized 120V inverter (also in the trunk) to power a few devices on-the-go.


    Drawing twice the power than the wire was fused for is a good way to need another car soon. Unless you also upgraded the wire, I wouldn't recommend changing the fuse size.

    I have a reasonably sized inverter in my trunk also, next to the battery. 1KW will power most anything except hair dryers you care to bring along.

    At home, we have a DC run throughout the house wherever we upgraded our power,

    This is not a good idea. Volts X Amps = Watts in DC circuits. To run a 100 watt laptop cross the house on 12 volts with less than 10% voltage drop requires a huge wire. Do the math.

    http://www.otherpower.com/cgi-bin/webbbs/webbbs_config.pl?noframes;read=6346

    Don't forget a 50 foot cord is a 100 foot DC path.

    To cut your loss in the wire by 100 as in a 10$ loss is now a 0.1% loss, go from 12 volts to 120 volts. That is the simple reason for the big inverter in the trunk. I can run a 100 foot 14 AWG extension cord and have less than 1% voltage drop in the cord to a 100 Watt laptop.

    From the page "14AWG = .00297 ohms / foot". Doing the math, a 100 foot 14 gauge extension cord is 200 feet of wire with a resistance of .00297 ohms per foot. 0.00297 X 200 = 0.594 ohms. To get 100 Watts at the far end of the wire at 12 volts, you need to deliver 8 and 1/3 amps. That amprage going on that almost .6 ohm wire will have a voltage loss of 0.594 X 8.3333 or 4.9499 volts. To get 12 volts out, you need to put in 12 + 4.9499 volts. Volts X Amps in the wire is the power lost.. Let's see, lost 4.94 volts along 200 feet while carying 8.3333 amps. That's 41 Watts. In short to drive a 100 watt load, you toss out almost 1/3rd of your power in the wire.

    Now using the same cord and laptop but now using 120 volts. Instead of needing 8.3333 amps for the 100 watts, we now need 1/10 of that or 0.8333 amps. Our voltage loss is now 1/10th what it was or 0.49499 volts at 1/10th the current. We now lose 1/100th the power in the wire we were before while still delivering 100 watts to the laptop. Now the wire has a loss of 0.41 Watts. I don't need to boost anything to make up for it.

    I'm shocked that more devices aren't standardizing on DC. 18V, 5A+, not a big deal -- but so many devices could use it (charging tools, video games, cell phones, even some computer monitors). Simple, without needed ANOTHER heat-generating and wasting transformer. My laptop is DC, too, yet I need the darned transformer throughout the house.

    Do the math and you won't be shocked at all. I would rather lose 5 watts in a laptop power supply than 40 watts in the 50 foot wire from the battery fuse box to the laptop.

    I've standardized on 120 VAC for almost everything. As a bonus, I don't have to buy special 12 volt CF bulbs at $15 each. I can use the buck a bulb ones instead. It's all about saving money. A 1 KW inverter is chaep and can be located very close to the battery to keep loss minimum in the low voltage wire.

    http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11234952&search=inverter&Mo=13&cm_re=1_en-_-Top_Left_Nav-_-Top_search&lang=en-US&Nr=P_CatalogName:BC&Sp=S&N=5000043&whse=BC&Dx=mode+matchallpartial&Ntk=Text_Search&Dr=P_CatalogNam

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  19. Standards and poor design choices by Emetophobe · · Score: 4, Informative
    His first four points are all about a lack of standards:

    1. Cordless tools and equipment--all with different kinds of battery packs and chargers.
    2. Flashlights and other small electrical devices that run on exotic batteries.
    3. Cellphones that all come with different chargers and power-supply units.
    4. AV equipment that has different types of hookups and remote-control protocols.

    And his other three points are all about bloat and poor design choices:

    5. Computer operating systems loaded with stuff I don't want and will never use.
    6. Automobiles with obnoxious electronics.
    7. Cars designed to make it tough to do maintenance.

    Overall he makes some pretty good points.

    In response to his first three complaints, I don't think companies will ever give up their non-standard battery packs... they make too much money on replacement batteries.

    As for complaint #4, I thought AV equipment was pretty well standardized already. All of my TV and AV equipment accept the same types of audio cables. I'd agree with his point about remotes though. I've never owned a "universal remote" that "just worked".

    In complaint #5, Jamie is mainly complaining about the bloat in Windows (more specifically Vista). I think the problem is that Operating Systems like Windows have to be designed with a wide user base in mind, so they have to have features that only 10% of the users would use. It would be nice if Microsoft actually made a modular OS where I could uninstall everything that I don't use (Outlook and IE for example). I have to give Jamie props for advocating Linux in the article.

    Here's a quote from complaint #5 which I totally agree with:

    And high-tech companies--stop messing with us on your treadmill of upgrades while making the old stuff obsolete. It may be that any software company that didn't routinely upgrade its product would go out of business. But what if the rest of the world worked this way? Oh, I lost a sock. I need to get a whole new wardrobe because the replacement sock is version 2.0.1, and the stores now only sell version 2.0.3.

    His main complaint in #6 is that he doesn't like cars that beep at him to buckle his seatbelt and he doesn't like cars that auto-lock the doors. Personally, I don't mind these features, but I can understand why someone might find them annoying. As for all the other electronics going in cars nowadays, I don't mind them. If you've ever driven in a BMW, you'd probably fall in love with all of the electronics. Whenever I drive in my toyota, I'm constantly adjusting the temperature as it's always fluctuating between too hot or too cold (I can never seem to find that comfort zone). But in a Beamer, I can set the temperature to 22C and forget about it. Some electronics I can live without, like those onboard navigation screens, but others I tend to enjoy.

    And finally, complaint #7 is all about poor design choices (in cars). Here's his example of a bad design: "One late-model sedan I worked on required the removal of a front wheel, plus a bunch of other stuff, just to replace the battery". I'm not a mechanic, and I have little to no experience under the hood, but are a lot of cars really designed this poorly? I can't think of any car where I actually had to remove a tire just to change the battery (Does anyone know what car Jamie was talking about?).

    1. Re:Standards and poor design choices by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >I think the problem is that Operating Systems like Windows have to be designed with a wide user base in mind, so they have to have features that only 10% of the users would use.

      Sort of.
      It's more that Windows is designed with a wider base of user *experience* in mind -- they hand you everything and you use it. A la carte, the *nix way, is great if the user knows enough to go decide what's needed. My linux system can load drivers for stuff Windows has never heard of: Amiga file system management, USB-to-serial IC's. But 90% of the people who use computers will never need any of that, so the Windows system of one-package-to-rule-them-all, one-package-to-bind-them works great. But just try to get support or drivers working on Windows for any hardware that's not sold at Best Buy. (I bought a Philips webcam a while back. It works with Windows98. There is no other version of Windows that can work with it. But a tiny bit of tweaking and my linux systems, one from 9 years ago and one brand-new, could both handle it.)

      >I'm not a mechanic, and I have little to no experience under the hood, but are a lot of cars really designed this poorly?

      Other people have already talked about the specific case of the battery behind the wheel. Things I've seen on cars I've worked on: having to remove the wheel to change the oil filter, on a Saturn; having to remove part of the power steering booster to change the rearmost spark plug, on an Oldsmobile; and having to wrap the CV boots with plastic bags before removing the oil filter so it doesn't drip on them and dissolve the rubber seals, on a Subaru. I've been told that on some rear-engine Porsches you had to remove the engine to change the spark plugs, and on some '85-90 Corvettes you had to remove part of the intake manifold to change the spark plugs. On my dad's '64 Ford, there were no hydraulic lifters, so every 3000 miles or thereabouts, I had to relash the valves -- manually adjust for the wear in the valve train. I had to do that on my '84 Nissan, actually, but then all the clearances were quoted cold, so that wasn't too bad. On my '71 Datsun, they were quoted hot, so you'd run the engine, then quickly pull off the valve cover and start measuring clearances between really hot pieces of metal, trying to adjust them accurately. But the '64 Ford was the king of annoyance, because the adjustment was specified WHILE THE ENGINE WAS RUNNING. You want a bad time: try adjusting a nice hot threaded bolt with a locknut, while it's jerking through about 15 degrees of movement 400 times a minute, while hot oil is spraying out of the valve train lubrication lines, and you have to feed a feeler gauge between the bottom of the bolt and the top of the pushrod during the brief moment they're not in contact. Oh, and the cam was sufficiently aggressive that at idle the car was continuously backfiring through the carburetor so there were occasional blasts of flame from right in front of you.
      Compared to that, what's a little hassle like removing a wheel to replace the battery? I was so glad to see that car go, even if it did have the hottest engine Detroit ever made.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  20. Re:Things will be getting simpler, and are already by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All my phones in recent years use a USB port to charge. My new iMate Ultimate 6150 does, my previous HTC Trinity did, my wife's Motorola phones do. I won't buy a phone without a USB port to charge with. Do you mean that the phones have a standard usb/mini-usb socket on them so you can use a standard usb cable, or that the cable has a usb plug on one end and a proprietary phone plug on the other?
  21. Screw *ALL* OS's! by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Personally, I decided to forgo BIOS's and OS's altogether and just work directly in Assembly.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  22. Going to make some guesses here without RTFA by BeeBeard · · Score: 4, Funny

    His chief complaints are:

    1. Electric mustache trimmers far more newfangled than the reliable steam-powered models.

    2. Local beret dealer insists on selling them in outlandish, inefficient colors such as "blue" and "red" instead of the more streamlined "black" model.

    3. Technological advances in promulgating human rights laws make it no longer possible to keep hyperactive co-host safely chained to a radiator in the basement between tapings.

  23. Re:Ubuntu no better by ericrost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My apologies, but ATi has given the linux community (up until late last year) NO support to produce free drivers for them, and the drivers they put out at that time, while existant, may as well have not been built. Those cards (I have one sitting on a shelf) are just no-go under Ubuntu. nVidia vs ATi is a great example of what open specs, cooperation, and transparency get you. nVidia provided decent binary drivers (they had their issues at times) and has worked with the community to develop an open source driver.

    ATi, however, crapped out drivers that don't work for years. Unfortunately, the answer is that you're SOL. I battled with a 9800 all in wonder pro for close to a month under gentoo then ubuntu before I just dropped back and made that machine into a server. So yes, the answer if you would like to use your machine with Ubuntu is to get a better video card. Sorry you had it put to you so rudely before, but that's what open development on one side and closed on the other gets you: winners and losers. If only they were all open.

  24. Re:Obligatory... by misleb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Drop some weight?? What? Did she gain a lot of weight lately and I just haven't seen recent episodes? Because I don't think I've ever seen her and thought "wow, if only she'd lose a few pounds." Or are you one of those guys that has to be able to count the ribs on a girl before she's considered hot? Ick.

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death