Slashdot Mirror


India and US to Cooperate in Space Exploration

p1234 writes "India and the US plan to cooperate in the exploration and use of outer space. India's first mission to the moon, Chandrayaan-1, is scheduled to be launched later this year. This is the culmination of long-term planning on both sides of the Atlantic. Apart from India's moon mission, Nair said a probe of Mars by India was very much on the agenda.'Our scientific community would like to see what new things we can find. It is not just for the sake of sending a probe to Mars. Yes, we have an agenda by 2012, by then we should have a Mars mission.'"

153 comments

  1. Cooperation? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Funny

    India gets permission to use our moon landing sets in the American desert far from prying eyes :)

    1. Re:Cooperation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      India gets permission to use our moon landing sets in the American desert far from prying eyes :)
      Yep you know the one, right next to the secret government weather control complex and the Roswell flying saucer testing facility.
    2. Re:Cooperation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Indian version will be a musical.

    3. Re:Cooperation? by DaCentaur · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha ha ha!!! You have a good point there, Brian.

    4. Re:Cooperation? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Well now I see they're rolling out the million-plus UID model.

  2. Of course there will cooperation. by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0, Troll

    We supply the money. The Indians supply the cheap labor.

    1. Re:Of course there will cooperation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh??? How is that "supplying" anything? Money is just pieces of paper. You can indefinitely print them, with no limit. Sounds like a good deal -- print worthless crap, Indians do all the work.

      Seriously, why do they agree to this?

    2. Re:Of course there will cooperation. by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      you can exchange money for goods and servies. I didn't realize it was that complicated.

      when you print an endless amount of money, it becomes worthless, therefor not suitable in exchange for goods and servies.

      think before posting please, and read up on inflation while you're at it.

      --
      Gone!
    3. Re:Of course there will cooperation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Huh??? How is that "supplying" anything? Money is just pieces of paper. You can indefinitely print them, with no limit. It seems that you missed the entire currency debate during the end of the Stone Age.
    4. Re:Of course there will cooperation. by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      I think this guy could supply plenty of the funds India isn't all poor, they just have a larger wealth divide then most western countries.

      --
      We are all just people.
    5. Re:Of course there will cooperation. by knight17 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I also don't know why Americans are shouting so much about outsourcing these days, since they get things done by issuing paper.

  3. Call centers in space... by owlnation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we are outsourcing NASA?

    1. Re:Call centers in space... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 0, Troll

      ..to space :)

    2. Re:Call centers in space... by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      Wow, I think we're setting a record for outsourcing jokes. Keep 'em coming...

      "Hello, this is Ramadaiariaki...I mean Doug. How may I help you with your satellite's solar panels today?"

    3. Re:Call centers in space... by Joaz+Banbeck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, we are cooperating with the Indians because they are the natural opponents of two of our probable future oppoenents: China and Pakistan. Pakistan is most likely to be the source of an islamic nuclear bomb, and China is on track to become a true superpower to contest the US like Russia did in the 60s, 70s, and 80s.
      This is Machiavellian geopolitics. Having a friend on the Asian continent will be useful much like having Israel for a friend in the Mid-east.

    4. Re:Call centers in space... by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Bangalore, we have a problem..."

    5. Re:Call centers in space... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having a friend on the Asian continent will be useful much like having Israel for a friend in the Mid-east. Gee, I sure hope not.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Call centers in space... by supremebob · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and YES, we already tried rebooting it!

    7. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yet another propagation of the misquoted phrase.. It was never "Houston, we have a problem;" it was:

      Houston, we've had a problem.

      </pedant>

    8. Re:Call centers in space... by Iftekhar25 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I don't think anyone on either side of the Atlantic is considering the possibility of Pakistan's nuclear capabilities falling into the hands of Islamic extremists.

      Even at the peak of anti-American sentiments after the invasion of Afghanistan, the hard-liner Islamic political parties never got more than 11% of the popular vote. Most political parties in Pakistan are moderate, and the nukes are buried deep in the military chain of command, which is secular.

      Pakistan remains firmly in the pocket of the United States. And there's enough inertia from both Pakistan and the United States to make sure that these traditional allies remain that way.

    9. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another propagation of the misquoted phrase.. It was never "Houston, we have a problem;" it was: ...

      "Houston, I have a problem: my anal-retentive crewmate keeps correcting me on worthless trivia, making it hard to concentrate on the dials."

    10. Re:Call centers in space... by Nemilar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pakistan is most likely to be the source of an islamic nuclear bomb,

      They are islamic and they do have a bomb already.

      --
      Nemilar http://www.techthrob.com - Visit Me!
    11. Re:Call centers in space... by XchristX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even at the peak of anti-American sentiments after the invasion of Afghanistan, the hard-liner Islamic political parties never got more than 11% of the popular vote. The Muttahida Majilis-i-Amal and their Islamic brownshirts, Jamaat-e-Islami, control enough arms, ammunition and al-Qaeda/Hizb-ut-Tahrir/Tablighi-whatever-whatever-glorious-Fidayeen-Lashkar-Hizbul support to stage a nationwide coup very soon. Even 11% supporters is enough for a sufficiently fanatic bunch to gain power by force.

      Most political parties in Pakistan are moderate, and the nukes are buried deep in the military chain of command, which is secular. No, large sections of Pakistan army, as well as the ISI (Pakistani secret police) are controlled by generals covertly sympathetic to Islamic fanatics. Pakistan is an Islamist ticking time bomb. Add to that serious grievances raised by Pakistan's Muhajir Urdu and Baluch minorities being discriminated against and systematically marginalized by the Punjabi majority, full blown sectarian conflicts between Sunni and Shia Muslims (the Shilpa-e-Shahaba is not dead), as well as full blown civil war from independence activists in Balochistan and Waziristan (so what really happened to Nawab Akbar Bugti?) , and we have a dangerously volatile situation there. And not everyone has forgotten 1971 Bangladesh (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_atrocities ).
      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    12. Re:Call centers in space... by b0nafide · · Score: 1

      If that's Machiavellian geopolitics, what's the name of the science of classifying thermonuclear radiation by religious orientation? i.e. that proton certainly is decaying in an islamic fashion, don't you think? oh yes, you can tell by the way it periodically spins towards mecca... ...?

    13. Re:Call centers in space... by khallow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seriously, I don't think anyone on either side of the Atlantic is considering the possibility of Pakistan's nuclear capabilities falling into the hands of Islamic extremists.

      If that is true, then there are a lot of government officials being grossly negligent in their duties. If I were the US president, I'd already have a military strategy for destroying or smuggling out those Pakistani nukes in case their government were replaced with a radical islamic government.

      Even at the peak of anti-American sentiments after the invasion of Afghanistan, the hard-liner Islamic political parties never got more than 11% of the popular vote. Most political parties in Pakistan are moderate, and the nukes are buried deep in the military chain of command, which is secular.

      11% is more than enough. And we don't know how secular the military chain of command will remain. Given what has happened in the past with the Pakistani nulcear program, this isn't something that I'd rely on.

      Pakistan remains firmly in the pocket of the United States. And there's enough inertia from both Pakistan and the United States to make sure that these traditional allies remain that way.

      Pakistan isn't firmly in anyone's pocket. And given how shaky (and illegitimate) their government is right now, you're whistling in the dark.

    14. Re:Call centers in space... by PHPfanboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, you're right.

      Stick with the Saudi's, they make a good market for your multi-billion dollar defense deals and keep your dollar high. Unfortunately they don't tend to show off the fireworks for your enemies' buddies to covet and last time they publicly demonstrated the capabilities of American industrial technology, you got a few thousand dead civilians in New York and a recession.

      Better luck with poverty-stricken Egypt, Baathist Syria, little poor Jordan, crumbly Lebanon and war-torn Iraq.

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    15. Re:Call centers in space... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe he meant a bomb which works by compressing Muslims until they reach critical mass? Do they then split into a Jew and a polytheist and emit a high-energy atheist (which then collides with another Muslim causing a chain reaction)?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we are mission control and now we see that a whole crew has gone to its great reward, yes,
      oh my......maybe the ultras did it!....and all the crore we paid for that...

    17. Re:Call centers in space... by amorsen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      11% is more than enough. Better than the US though, where the militant religious party has been known to get around 50% of the popular vote.
      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    18. Re:Call centers in space... by snick_hill · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you are privy to the progress India has made in the last few years.Talking to call center rep in India was the only way you could have known that there existed a foreign nation called India. And that is all you would ever come to know, unless you step out of that little hut of yours and see what are the nations that might possibly have an important role to play in American affairs in the future.please step out of your hut and look at the world outside.Americans have managed to garner a notorious reputation for being ignorant about other cultures.and please, when you reply back, do tell me your academic qualification so that I can decide whether or not to consider your further opinion. If your comment was only in light humor, then I laugh along with you: ha, ha , ha.

    19. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha! great thinking!!!!

    20. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    21. Re:Call centers in space... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Better luck with poverty-stricken Egypt, Baathist Syria, little poor Jordan, crumbly Lebanon and war-torn Iraq. All of whom might not be in such dire straits if it weren't for the US's 'friendship' with Israel in the first place. Those billions upon billions of US dollars spent on building up Israel might have been strategically used to make all of those other countries better places. Interesting you didn't mention Dubai, guess it would kind of contradict your rant.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    22. Re:Call centers in space... by thecrusher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure. And this policy has worked so well in the past. And calling India a democracy is a joke. Ask any of the Indian programmers you work with. Anyway...I see moves like this as less about any rational policy and more about a number of disparate motives colluding to drive policy. Just one example, you have Boeing which despite their advertisements would love regional destabilization that keeps our troops in hard way. Boeing executives *do* profit from war. And with the current tax cuts that favor the extremely weathly the most, they really profit. And since the space race isn't militarized enough (for Boeing) and since the US domestic population wouldn't like to see a weaponized space program...Boeing needs a proxy to create a crisis. So in the 1990's Boeing started working with the Chinese. And surprise! Soon after that the Chinese were a good 50 years ahead. The US government fined Boeing for this but it was just a slap on the wrist. What Boeing wanted they got, a more dangerous China which they would use to drive more revenue to themselves from American taxpayers to protect us from the dangers they create. Why do you think Boeing needs to run ads about how much they care? So I see making India a real player in space is just a perfect way to cause more tension and therefore more danger and therefore more for Boeing and others to "protect" us from. Its awesome!

    23. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it isn't like having Israel for a "friend" in the Middle East. If it is then we can expect to park a few million troops along the Himalayas to protect the Indians from the Chinese in 5 or 10 years. And Israeli "friendship" comes with a whopping dollar price tag. The 6.2 million Israelis get a $3 billion annual gift from US taxpayers, withs multi billion dollar bonuses at fairly regular intervals (like the 10 billion last year). If we paid the 1.1 billion Indians at that per capita they'd get over half a trillion a year. No, I hope an alliance with India doesn't look anything like the one with Israel.

    24. Re:Call centers in space... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Better than the US though, where the militant religious party has been known to get around 50% of the popular vote. There's nothing like that in the US.
    25. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thats great!

    26. Re:Call centers in space... by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no rant here :-| Those I listed were all Soviet allies prior to 1967 (when US and Israel strategic alignment started in the shape it is today) and have been (with the exception of Lebanon) military dictatorships for the past 40 years. Before then, Israel got most of its arms from France and the UK, so I dispute your claim that Israel is the source of all those countries political, economic and social problems. I'd look at the Sykes-Picot treaty, the division of the Ottoman empire and the invention of all the countries in the region by France and the UK as perhaps more likely. Dubai: 1.5 million people comprised of over 80% expats. That's not a good strategic gamble, besides you already have the 7th fleet stationed in Bahrain.

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    27. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Friend" Israel? This "friend", the biggest per capita welfare case in history, lives off the American taxpayer to the tune of $3 billion a year, not counting bonuses like the $10 billion that the self-proclaimed "worst Congress in history" sent them last year.

      If India becomes proportionately as "useful" to us as Israel it will cost us half a trillion a year in direct aid, and we'd have to park a few million troops in the Himalayas.

    28. Re:Call centers in space... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      so I dispute your claim that Israel is the source of all those countries political, economic and social problems. Try again. That's not even close to what I said.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    29. Re:Call centers in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hinduism is Oxymoron.

      Instead one should ask what is Casteism.

      Castes were created in 12th century...

      Hinduism's caste system is a religious-based system of separating groups and keeping one class (the Brahmins) over everyone else. In America there is no system in place today that forces people to remain separate or keeps one class subservient to another. If you were born the son of a street sweeper, but excelled, you could become a doctor or lawyer or some celebrity or entrepreneur - and at the same time you would be fully accepted by your peers.

      Not so in India. The caste system freezes everyone in place. It is extremely difficult - almost impossible - for someone from the lowest caste to rise in education and social status. A Dalit would never be allowed to marry into one of the higher castes and would never be accepted as an equal. And for a Dalit to make it into medical school or become a member of high society in India is very rare indeed.

      Only by escaping from the grasp of Hinduism do they have much of a chance.

  4. It's just a plan to get CHEAP astronauts! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    -1 troll

  5. mutual benefit? by peektwice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not trying to troll here, but it would seem that India could use our already sizable knowledge of space exploration, and we can use cheap engineers. I wonder if this has anything to do with the general decline in engineering enrollment at US Universities?

    --
    Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
    1. Re:mutual benefit? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and we can use cheap engineers.

      You must not be a US engineer.

    2. Re:mutual benefit? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      More to the point, enrollment in engineering and scientific curriculae is not exactly down in the U.S. ... it's enrollment by American citizens that is down. China and India are packing our schools, especially China. What's going to happen once they've sucked us dry of whatever knowledge they feel they need is another story.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:mutual benefit? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Studies by the Rand institute and other research organizations have shown there is NO "engineer/sci shortage". Thus, it is a corporate myth that the US is not graduating enough. However, it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy if offshoring drives down wages in those fields.

    4. Re:mutual benefit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you ever seen what kind of mathematics is teached in American colleges?

      Math110 has less content than most math classes in the first year of high school in Europe!

      Maybe there are enough US engeeners around, but are they good for anything?

    5. Re:mutual benefit? by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      Correctin spalling on /./

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:mutual benefit? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, it's true the the primary education system in the U.S. is deficient, but that just means colleges have to provide remedial training.

      Besides, good engineers are the ones that don't depend upon what they learn in school for everything anyways.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:mutual benefit? by samkass · · Score: 1

      I guess the answer to your final question depends on whether we let them stay in the country and work for our economy or deny them H1Bs and send them home to set up outsourcing businesses and improve China's economy.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    8. Re:mutual benefit? by protobion · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I propose a different perspective. Have any of you actually thought, that all instances of cooperation of the US with China or India may not necessarily involve the other two countries supplying the "cheap labour". If you RTFA, NASA is actually providing 11 instruments to be on board the moon vehicle. No doubt , it will provide its knowledgebase as well. ISRO and NASA have a long history of co-operation.

      Satellites are not launched everyday, moon missions still more infrequently. The usual way to obtain access to space for whatever reasons is often to provide some payload to a party who's going to launch a vehicle anyway. Not too long ago, India launched a military satellite for Israel. What India is providing here, is the excellent satellite launching infrastructure it has due to an active space program. The US space program was always geared towards manned-missions.

      Let me end this rant by saying that developments in all fields do not have to reflect the trends in IT (where India does provide a cheap back-office). It's time people got off the idea that the US always provides the money, the knowledge, while other countries are sources of cheap brainless workers. Appreciate the achievements of others.

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    9. Re:mutual benefit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree about the fact that shool is not enough.
      But it still needed.

      And the time spent catching up on basic skills (that should have been tought in high school) steals time from other learning.

      Let's face it: in 4 years you can learn only a fixed amount of things.
      Who will get more of it? The one that comes well prepared or the one that needs to start almost from scratch?

      I have nothing against Americans, but the school system is fundamentally broken, and it is no surprise that companies look elsewhere for workers.
      It is not the lower pay! It is the knowledge base that comes with them.

    10. Re:mutual benefit? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have a sweet job at a small biotech startup in Silicon Valley. I was born in Philadelphia and I'm as white as white guys come. So who else works at this company?

      The CEO, the CFO, and one of our principal investors are all from Iran. The CTO, the DBA, and my supervisor are from India. (The CTO is writing a tech book for a well-known publisher; I expect it will be reviewed here in a few months.) The principal database curator, the statistician, and three people on the dev team are Chinese nationals. The product manager is from the former Soviet Union; so is one of the UI devs and our street-smart IT guy. The head of tech support is Indian (OK, technically Canadian); she manages an offshore team of scientists in South America who import data into the system all day. We also just hired two additional Indian employees whom I haven't really met yet.

      And then there are three white guys including me- AFAIK the only U.S. citizens. Maybe a few others are too (I've never really thought about it). Half of the people where I work came from a company that was originally started by another white guy. He lost faith in the future of the United States a few years ago, sold his business to a Fortune 500 corporation here (which promptly mismanaged it into oblivion), and took something like 10 or 20 million dollars back home to Australia.

      I read threads like this one, I watch the news, and I listen to all the bloviating over Iran, over India and China, and it all just seems surreal to me. I wonder what the future holds for this place.

    11. Re:mutual benefit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a physics student at an American public university. I don't know what it's like for engineers, but my first year of undergrad I started with MATH 241, vector calculus. Most of us skipped the very low-level classes. They had 1xx-level physics classes, but physics majors started at 2xx level. Overall, I'm very happy with my undergrad education. I think anybody who tried to tell me that American university science programs suck is full of shit.

    12. Re:mutual benefit? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Math110 has less content than most math classes in the first year of high school in Europe!

      In practice, most engineers don't use that stuff often anyhow in the real world. US schools are just more practical.

    13. Re:mutual benefit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of racist asinine BS. Where do you think all these people are going to end up? In Iran? In China? In India? No. All of them will become US citizens and valuable ones at that. This is exactly how the US has been building herself for the last century and a bit and you are very likely an import as well. What are you? Polish (OK, technically American)?

      Twit.

    14. Re:mutual benefit? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      What a load of racist asinine BS. Where do you think all these people are going to end up? In Iran? In China? In India? No. All of them will become US citizens and valuable ones at that.

      Who even cares "where they end up"? If we're lucky they'll stick around, but you shouldn't blithely assume people will always want to keep coming here and staying here because the U.S. is so great. I just think it's funny to see everyone bashing India, China, and especially Iran at the same time I'm depending on immigrants from those exact countries for my paycheck.

      This is exactly how the US has been building herself for the last century and a bit and you are very likely an import as well. What are you? Polish (OK, technically American)?

      Italian, English, Spanish, French, Polish, Irish, German, Scottish, Cherokee, and Nicaraguan- just like you.

    15. Re:mutual benefit? by khallow · · Score: 1

      I guess my response here is that one needs to consider comparative advantage. It makes sense for India to provide the cheaper labor and the US to supply the knowledge. Because that's where the relative strengths of the two countries are at the moment. Frankly, the IT trend is purely economic and it's foolish to ignore economics especially in something as expensive as space launch services.

    16. Re:mutual benefit? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I read threads like this one, I watch the news, and I listen to all the bloviating over Iran, over India and China, and it all just seems surreal to me. I wonder what the future holds for this place. I have two scenarios.

      1. Soft Landing: The British model. Gradual decline from preeminence, rolling back of military commitments globally. Remains a respected power on the American continent, a strong voice among equals on the global stage, no longer considered a super-power in terms of economy, wealth, standard of living, conventional military, retains strategic nukes to no purpose, like dirt-poor descendants of nobility holding on to useless heirlooms from a happier age.

      2. Hard landing: Post-soviet-style meltdown, possibly becoming as bad as the fall of the Roman empire. Just how bad it gets depends on the quality of the craven leaders running things. Could end up with a severely stratified society divided between ultra-rich and dirt poor, eradication of the middle-class, America becomes a country we no longer recognize. Can always get worse if the leaders of the declining times decide to start a few foreign wars to "jumpstart" the economy.

      Thems my two scenarios.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    17. Re:mutual benefit? by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      we cannot be reading the same post as you cause i dont see the racist anything anywhere ?

    18. Re:mutual benefit? by phoenix51 · · Score: 1

      yeah....a truly factual reply among all!...i think dat India has developed a reputation of being among the newest in the elite club of space engineers.........this co-operation will provide an opportunity to explore new things on moon....(and probably mars too).....why our friends from other part of atlantic cant accept the change..........well lets think bout the mutual benefits that this co-operation would bring to us all

    19. Re:mutual benefit? by nareshov · · Score: 1

      I read threads like this one, I watch the news, and I listen to all the bloviating over Iran, over India and China, and it all just seems surreal to me. I wonder what the future holds for this place. Nothing much.
  6. NASA Offshoring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Outsourced astronauts? Now that's what I call REAL offshoring!

    1. Re:NASA Offshoring? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now that's what I call REAL offshoring!

      I coineth a new term: "Moonshoring"

    2. Re:NASA Offshoring? by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      how about 'Mooning'

    3. Re:NASA Offshoring? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      To the shores of the Sea of Tranquility...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    4. Re:NASA Offshoring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about 'Mooning'

      Sigh, being mooned by "free" trade.

    5. Re:NASA Offshoring? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      To the shores of the Sea of Tranquility...

      Right next to Pinkslip Crater.

  7. It is good. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    If India buys some technology and know how from USA, it will help reduce the trade deficit USA has with India. But if NASA sells some of the technology to India, where will it set up the tech support center?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:It is good. by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Well, how far is the american economy from india outsourcing tech support to us?

    2. Re:It is good. by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Funny

      If India buys some technology and know how from USA

      But they'll invent curry-in-a-tube.

    3. Re:It is good. by Kyojin · · Score: 1

      But that'd be an awesome thing! Oh for my mod points back...

  8. This is geopolitics 101 by miletus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like the previous deals on nuclear power, this is an attempt to bribe India away from getting too friendly with China and Iran, and buying U.S. arms instead of Russian. Science has nothing to do with it.

    1. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      this is an attempt to bribe India away from getting too friendly with China and Iran, and buying U.S. arms instead of Russian.

      India will have the last laugh because they will have bribes and weapons from all three, in the end.

    2. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Something which makes the US a nicer partner for India is that English is a fairly widely understood language in India, whereas neither Russian nor Mandarin are. Beats me how much of a factor that would be, though.

    3. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think Iran's in any position to bribe India at the moment.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    4. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Oil

    5. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by evilviper · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Like the previous deals on nuclear power, this is an attempt to bribe India away from getting too friendly with China and Iran, and buying U.S. arms instead of Russian.

      China and India are likely to be very serious rivals, rather than friends. Both have huge populations, and are developing countries trying to break into high-tech. Being right next to each hurts rather than helps.

      Iran seems an extremely unlikely partner as well. India is an open democracy, with a far freer society, and are not predominately Muslim. I also don't see much that Iran could offer India to begin with, as India is technologically much further along.

      Russia... Maybe... Though India has much stronger economic ties with the English speaking western world than it does with Russia. Are Indian car makers trying to buy the Range Rover and Jaguar brands so that they can sell such branded vehicles to Russia? China? Iran? Not likely.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Something which makes the US a nicer partner for India is that English is a fairly widely understood language in India, whereas neither Russian nor Mandarin are. Beats me how much of a factor that would be, though.

      Probably not much of one. There are already more people in China who can speak English than there are in the U.S.

      By 2025 China will have more English speakers than the entire rest of the world.

    7. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by XchristX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Iran seems an extremely unlikely partner as well. India is an open democracy, with a far freer society, and are not predominately Muslim. I also don't see much that Iran could offer India to begin with, as India is technologically much further along.
      India's greatest strength over Iran is it's liberal education, particularly in colleges and universities. That is why the technocrat generation in India is much larger and better trained than the ones in Iran.
      Interestingly, a lot of Iranian students are now interested in pursuing higher education in India, particularly after Ahmadinejad expelled liberal professors from Iranian Universities, and Iranians have a harder time getting into western universities because of political problems. I spent a summer in the Inter-University Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics in Pune, India and there were several Iranian students with very progressive and liberal outlook , unlike the Ayatollahs (they got me hooked on Dariush Mehrjui http://www.opendemocracy.net/arts/iranian_cinema_2595.jsp films) who were all cursing the Islamic theocracy in Iran.
      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    8. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      India and Russia have a long history of excellent relations, especially in arms trade.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    9. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Oil is a fungible resource. If Iran won't sell to them, someone else will.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    10. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by STrinity · · Score: 1

      If this is Geopolitics 101, you flunk. China and India are rivals not friends, and they aren't going to get in bed with any country that would side with Pakistan if it got taken over by an Islamic fundamentalist dictatorship.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    11. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oil is a fungible resource. If Iran won't sell to them, someone else will.

      How dare you accuse other countries of infecting our oil with mold!

    12. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by miletus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Iran has gas, India needs gas, and there was a pipeline deal from Iran to India through Pakistan, which pretty muched got nixed because of U.S. pressure.

      Russia has historically strong ties with India and still sells it a lot of weaponry. With the rise of a the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as an emerging military alliance between Russia, China, various Central Asian countries, and now Iran, India has to choose whether to ally with her neighbors or the U.S. The stakes are pretty high geopolitically.

    13. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Like the previous deals on nuclear power, this is an attempt to bribe India away from getting too friendly with China and Iran, and buying U.S. arms instead of Russian. Science has nothing to do with it.
      I can't beleive that got modded insightful.

      I hate to jump on the bandwagon, but, as others have pointed out, there is exactly zero chance of India and China being friendly any time soon. And, secondly, while I understand that it's considered "cool" these days to assign eeeevil motives to all US interactions with other nations, not EVERYTHING has to be about warfare and power. For fucks sakes, we should all be excited about the fact that for the first time in history, a nation other than Russia is capable of rivalling the US space effort! And other nations are close behind! This is an AWESOME time to be alive! We're going to see cooperation and competition in new frontiers! And all you can think is "aw, it's those damn yanks trying to take over the world again"? What's WRONG with you???
    14. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Russia has historically strong ties with India and still sells it a lot of weaponry. With the rise of a the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as an emerging military alliance between Russia, China, various Central Asian countries, and now Iran, India has to choose whether to ally with her neighbors or the U.S. The stakes are pretty high geopolitically.

      No need to worry here folks. SCO is already in bankrupt!

      --
      Be relentless!
    15. Re:This is geopolitics 101 by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Like the previous deals on nuclear power, this is an attempt to bribe India away from getting too friendly with China and Iran, and buying U.S. arms instead of Russian. Science has nothing to do with it.

      I'm curious: Have you seen the foreign policy documents, or the transcripts of interviews with chief diplomats, that support your claim? Or are you just guessing?
      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  9. Astronauts have had it too good & expect too m by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Funny

    They expect their employers to train them, then they expect these huge salaries starting from their first day in outer space.

    NASA really had no choice. Either NASA had to get around the H1-B laws, or hire illegal alian astronuts. And Sigourney Weaver advised against that.

  10. Popcorn reek, except 10x worse by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They aren't going to be cooking eye watering curry in cramped space vehicles and stations, are they?

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  11. Correction: 4 (Re:This is geopolitics 101) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Correction, that's 4, not 3.

  12. Jokes by Teun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I see several jokes about cheap engineers or bad education, the scariest example of the latter is probably the statement in the summary about 'both sides of the Atlantic'.
    It really makes me wonder where India borders the Atlantic...

    A likely indication the summary was done with some US-style geography classes :)

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Jokes by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      'both sides of the Atlantic'. It really makes me wonder where India borders the Atlantic...

      The borders have been offshored too.

    2. Re:Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India doesn't have to border the Atlantic Ocean to be on the opposite side of it relative to the US. Just look at a map. To get to India from the US traveling east, one can start in the US, travel clear across the Atlantic, travel over Africa and the Middle East, and then arrive in India. Thus India is on the opposite side of the Atlantic Ocean.

      It's no different than saying that France and Ukraine are on opposite sides of the Czech Republic. That statement is completely true, even though neither France nor Ukraine borders the Czech Republic.

    3. Re:Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, India and the USA are on the same side of the Atlantic now?

    4. Re:Jokes by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Thought that part was probably more likely written by an american than an indian.

    5. Re:Jokes by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 1

      If you start in Utah and move east long enough (including crossing the Atlantic) you eventually end up in Nevada. Therefore, Nevada and Utah are on opposite sides of the Atlantic, even though they border each other.

      -:sigma.SB

      --
      WARN
      THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    6. Re:Jokes by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not so obvious when considering that the earth is round and that the countries in question are almost exactly on oposite sides.

      Its like being in Australia and saying that Greenland is on the other side of India. It makes you go "wtf has India got to do with greenland and australia?"

    7. Re:Jokes by notnAP · · Score: 1

      Well, we had outsourced that article to them, but they haven't been reachable via email lately.

    8. Re:Jokes by relaxinparadise · · Score: 1

      'thank you, come again"

      apu @ quickie mart

  13. Sharing of knowledge will help US and India by mohanbabu · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a great opportunity for both countries to share the best scientists on both sides. This mission http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/about_chandrayaan.htm is very critical and challenging for Indian scientists. They need every help they can get to pull this. In the past, when US denied supercomputing facilities, Indian went and reinvented the wheel http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2906865.stm (although the effort was worth it).With relations improving between two countries, it will be foolish and immature not to accomplish.

    This effort will NOT face any opposition like the Nuclear deal. The nuclear deal went down the drain because the stupid "left" politicians played the "Indian congress government is surrendering to US" card. They also threatened to withdraw their support which would have collapsed the Congress ruling party http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/wm1688.cfm. This time, they will make sure this deal is made and take the bragging rights for landing India on the moon. Yes, the Indian politics is screwed up. But they are not fools to let this deal go away.

    1. Re:Sharing of knowledge will help US and India by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Indian politics is screwed up.

      Of Indian politics I know nothing, but if they're more screwed up than ours I'd be very impressed.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  14. Re:Astronauts have had it too good & expect to by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Either NASA had to get around the H1-B laws, or hire illegal alian astronuts.

    Isn't "alien astronaut" an oxymoron? It hurts my nauts to think about that one.

  15. Re:GOD DAMNIT by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stop being a racist! You ass hole!

    I think the anti-offshoring sentiment is more an anti-corporation movement than an anti-Indian movement. I've seen in detail how corporate lobbyists manipulate the facts to create a "shortage". The bad guys are really the corporate lobbyists who hype free-trade and bribe politicians with campaign donations. We are not a democracy if lobbyists control politicians to such a degree.

  16. Thumbing a lift by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    NASA's just planning for when the shuttles wear-out completely and any replacement vehicles have been lost in the cracks.

    Buying rides in India won't be as embarrassing as begging ones in Russia.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  17. Wrong country to learn from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, so other countries are arranging their priorities the way the US does. Of course, shit like space exploration is a better investment than dealing with widespread problems ON OUR OWN FCUKING PLANET! Poverty? Disease? War? Pfft, who gives a shit when we can waste billions on exploring space?! *wide, greedy grin*

    You know US, you're the country everyone looks up to as an example. Maybe you should lead people down a better road than this. And to other countries, please don't mold your politics after the US.

    1. Re:Wrong country to learn from by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      who gives a shit when we can waste billions on exploring space?

      Do you have any idea what you talking about, what the value of near-Earth space efforts have been? Billions upon billions in economic returns (hell, weather monitoring alone is worth the price of admission.) Space research is hardly wasted. Could all of us do better at managing our world? Sure. But shutting down space programs isn't the way to do that.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Wrong country to learn from by khallow · · Score: 1

      Great, so other countries are arranging their priorities the way the US does. Of course, shit like space exploration is a better investment than dealing with widespread problems ON OUR OWN FCUKING PLANET! Poverty? Disease? War? Pfft, who gives a shit when we can waste billions on exploring space?! *wide, greedy grin*

      I see a couple of responses. First, space exploration is an investment in the future. These others are not. They merely fix problems that shouldn't exist.

      Second, which one of that list is the most important? Why aren't you advocating that all resources go to fix the most urgent problem first? That is, if war is the worst problem, then forget poverty and disease. Focus on war, right? Such an extreme viewpoint would ignore, of course, that there's tremendous synergy in spreading resources around and working on more problems. Well, space has powerful synergies with a lot of Earth-side problems. For example, poverty can be eased by growing the economy into space. The ill effects of war can be lessened by space-based intelligence gathering resources. Wars weren't started because two sides knew too much about each other and what they were doing. Space is the ideal laboratory for environmental technologies like complete recycling of water or biomass, solar power, nuclear power, and space-based industry. By moving people in space, we lessen their Earth-side ecological footprint.

    3. Re:Wrong country to learn from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying space can help to alleviate the problems we face on Earth? Give me a break. If we can't deal with the problems on the surface (of the planet, that is), how do you suppose we're going to magically make things in space work? Economy in space? You do realize nations will just fight over newly found resources the way we do with what we have here at home, right? Getting into space doesn't get away from Earth's problems. Getting into space just means we have more territory to fight over, and a larger ground for more wars.

      No. We shouldn't be imposing our almighty humans-know-everything agenda onto the rest of the universe until we can handle harmony on one tiny little planet first.

    4. Re:Wrong country to learn from by khallow · · Score: 1

      So you're saying space can help to alleviate the problems we face on Earth?

      Yes, I'm saying exactly that. There's plenty of history to back me up too. When humans have pushed the boundaries of what they can do, that usually has resulted in bettering the human condition in some way.

      Give me a break. If we can't deal with the problems on the surface (of the planet, that is), how do you suppose we're going to magically make things in space work?

      Humanity has done a lot of "magical" stuff over the millenia. Problems get solved when someone needs that problem to be solved. One thing I didn't mention was that the grandparent's concerns all had solutions already. We know how to end poverty and most communicable diseases. We know how to avoid war. We don't do these things. And it's not just a matter of money. My take is that in space, some things that we take for granted on Earth, like having a vast ecosystem that you can pollute or a nonproductive elite (that is, a group that controls society but doesn't contribute), can't exist in space. An inability to remove toxic chemicals or other harmful substances from the local living environment could result in the death of a space colony. Similarly, having a number of unproductive members could do so as well. So you actually have a human society that requires some of the things often considered desirable on Earth.

      Economy in space? You do realize nations will just fight over newly found resources the way we do with what we have here at home, right? Getting into space doesn't get away from Earth's problems. Getting into space just means we have more territory to fight over, and a larger ground for more wars.

      Yes, I gather that global GDP on space is somewhere around $100-200 billion now. That employs a lot of people worldwide. Second, we're going to fight anyway, it being one of those things nobody has a good fix for. Might as well do something productive than worry about it.

      Finally, while one can't get away from all problems, you can get away from a hell of a lot of Earth's problems by getting into space. As I mentioned above, the living environment needs to be pretty uncontaminated. But one doesn't have the same constraints on the outside environment. So you can have heavily polluting industries in space, as long as you keep it out of the places where people and other organisms live.

      No. We shouldn't be imposing our almighty humans-know-everything agenda onto the rest of the universe until we can handle harmony on one tiny little planet first.

      If you have some legitimate complaints, then we can talk about those. But I guess I need to point out that while humans don't know everything, they do know a hell of a lot more than anything else we've come across so far. As I see it, there's no time like the present to do great and important things. And we already know how to do the harmony thing on Earth. We chose not to. I see no reason to wait around and waste billions of peoples' lives just because a few losers want to revisit that decision. If you're upset because I'm imposing my "agenda" on a lifeless universe, then maybe that will spur you in turn to do something useful.

    5. Re:Wrong country to learn from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US, you're the country everyone looks up to

      No they aren't. I personally find their values repulsive - greed, arrogance, and a very unhealthy "don't-do-as-I-do-do-as-I-say" attitude. Survival of the richest, dumbed down society is not something to look up to in my opinion.

    6. Re:Wrong country to learn from by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you should take a look at my sig (not that I expect such an obnoxious remark as yours to actually get modded up.) I find people like you that see all Americans in the same light, regardless of who they are and what they stand for, to be just as repulsive.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  18. New Delhi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we have a problem.

  19. Shamless Pun by MrSteveSD · · Score: 0
    From the article.

    "I am honored to sign this agreement with the India Space Research Organization," Griffin said.

    Hmmm. Obviously trying to curry favor there :)
  20. Waiting... by vistic · · Score: 1

    I'm just going to wait and see if any asshats here can post a thoughtful comment about India's space exploration, maybe admiring their abilities and scholastic achievements... without making any asinine semi-racist comments about Indians stinking of curry, having unintelligible accents, being cheap labor, etc...

    So... any yet?

    1. Re:Waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outsource your sense of humor, Chandralamadingdong?

    2. Re:Waiting... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      post a thoughtful comment about India's space exploration, maybe admiring their abilities and scholastic achievements...

      Good God man, why? This is Slashdot, not The Journal of International Relations! Where else would we show off our subtle and sophisticated Western wit (or at least half of it)?

      --
      That is all.
  21. China? by donutello · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're going to title your post geopolitics 101 you should know that there is no danger of India getting too chummy with China. The two countries have several issues including a long-standing border dispute. India is not going to get chummy with China anytime soon. It's more likely the US wants to build India up to be a stronger foil to China in the region.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:China? by craagz · · Score: 0

      India and China are both working towards Peace, apart from Business ties.
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7188646.stm
      a recent visit by the Indian prime minister is only a follow-up of visits by various ministers to China.
      Hu Jintao wants better ties with India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/China/Hu_Jintao_for_closer_India-China_ties/articleshow/2703269.cms
      I think India is trying to be the neutral country it has always tried to be. Recently, India launched an Israeli satellite into orbit. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7199736.stm

      If India or China want to dominate the World after US decline, It is together and not through competition. Given the fact that India has the service industry and China has the manufacturing capabilities. They can feed off each other.. and become strong.

  22. Wow... by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1

    Think of all the paint it's going to take to write the names on all the Indian space doohickeys.

    --
    All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  23. New Catch-phrase by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Houston, we have a pinkslip!"

  24. Just a ruse by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I'll bet somewhere in this "agreement" is a provision that allows big government contractors like Lockheed and L3 to outsource sensitive classified projects to Indian engineering outsourcing firms.

    Science and Engineering in the US are dead. They died when we stopped teaching Math and Science to our kids back in the 90's.

  25. How can we be helping you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're gonna route the angry calls of protest from the Martian residents to Indian call centers?

  26. both sides of the Atlantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the culmination of long-term planning on both sides of the Atlantic.

    Well I sure hope the good folks living on that sub-continent in the Indian Ocean (thousands of kilometers from any side of the Atlantic) had some say in the planning too!

  27. Both sides of the atlantic? by jmdc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um ... India's not on a side of the Atlantic.

    1. Re:Both sides of the atlantic? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Quiet now. We don't need our senators to know that.

    2. Re:Both sides of the atlantic? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I believe the correct relational term is "both sides of the call center".

    3. Re:Both sides of the atlantic? by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      They're still considering inviting India to join NATO, a decision will be made once Australia becomes a full member.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    4. Re:Both sides of the atlantic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um ... India's not on a side of the Atlantic. But it is on a continent which connects to another continent which is on a side of the Atlantic =)
    5. Re:Both sides of the atlantic? by oliderid · · Score: 1

      They're still considering inviting India to join NATO, a decision will be made once Australia becomes a full member.

      Joining NATO doesn't mean that you move a subcontinent and a continent to Europe/Africa (the other side of the atlantic). otherwise you can't expect reinforcement for a billion of years or so. ;-)

  28. And there is more by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Eastern India is very strongly pro China, but the vast majority of India does not really care (though probably considers themselves more western aligned, be it America, UK, or Germany). For India, they need EU AND America. The reason is that China and/or Pakistan is likely to make another play for India. Pakistan will almost certainly fall to the taliban within another 2 years. This is the same group that tore out ancient buddist statues as being against Allah. They will also go after Kashmir in the only way they know; war. China is about to have more problems then they know what to do. They have over population; massive skewing of the sex (many more men than women), and combine that with a real shortage of water (though these last few weeks might seem to suggest otherwise). The glaciers that supply China (as well as parts of India) with water are melting VERY rapidly. India will probably be hurt a bit, but China will take it in the shorts within 10 years. They will NEED to go after the water that now flows to India. India will want support from elsewhere, along the same line that UK had from America in WWII.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  29. I just HAVE to ask by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I have been following this deal for quite some time. I was under the impression that it was still being looked at (though it seemed like the haggling had gone underground). In addition, I did notice the left announced that they had a deal with China to do something similar. What you are suggesting that the US nuke deal truly is dead? If so, will India seriously consider China's deal? China does not have much tech knowhow on building nuclear reactor save what they obtained from USSR and stole from America (of which some of ours was ALLOWED to be stolen; it will cause them problems if they use it; along the same line as when China stole the capacitor tech from japan).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  30. MOD parent up by x1n933k · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the best reply I've read so far.

  31. Huh??? by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    "This is the culmination of long-term planning on both sides of the Atlantic"

    Uh... I'm fairly sure that India doesn't border the Atlantic. Rather, I'm fairly sure they border another ocean, the Indian ocean perhaps.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  32. comments here remind me of blue collar miners by sunilarjun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sad to see the types of comments posted here---remuind me of blue collar miners etc...who would talk of "college educated" guys in the same way---because they were scared their way of living is being disrupted. If you're getting your butt kicked by India and China, learn to innovate---that's what America stands for---I don't hear Bill Gates or Steve Jobs whining like the pathetic folks here.

    1. Re:comments here remind me of blue collar miners by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      But..but..dey took ar jerbs!

      Seriously though, they can innovate too, and while idealistic speeches like that are all fine and good, it's too much to expect us to overcome powerful economic forces with mere innovation. To really compete, legal and economic realities need to be taken into account. Free trade puts us at a severe disadvantage economically that I don't think mere innovation can overcome.

  33. Do NOT expect a civilized society in India... by jawahar · · Score: 0, Troll

    As per BBC, 80% of the Indians live on 20 rupees (25p) a day. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6946800.stm
    20.00 INR = 0.511247 USD as per http://www.xe.com/
    And do NOT expect a civilized society in India...

    1. Re:Do NOT expect a civilized society in India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As per BBC, 80% of the Indians live on 20 rupees (25p) a day. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6946800.stm And that matters how?

      20.00 INR = 0.511247 USD as per http://www.xe.com/ 20? My that's different from a few years ago. Has your currency fallen to half its value in comparison to ours in such a short time? Huh. I know you got screwed with Bush and all but damn, some of that rise is our doing.

      And do NOT expect a civilized society in India... I'm sorry for you. Your ignorance is astounding. I apologise if you've experienced the hillbilly backward-ass Bihar or UP but if you're talking anywhere else, dude wtf? Glass houses eh. All these people, presumably Americans talking about 'bad education' and all, lol wut? Our education system is tough and the students are too. From experience I can tell you that almost any developed country Indians go to, they have a much easier time keeping up. Our idiots are your 'average'. Ultimate was when I was watching 'Beauty and the geek' the grad level questions that they asked? It's the same level as our high school.
    2. Re:Do NOT expect a civilized society in India... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Glass houses eh I don't think that this jawahar guy is American ("jawahar"?). His history of racist posts (and the language of his bigotry) against Indians on slashdot seems to indicate that he's a Sinhalese Fundamentalist or worse, a Periyarite-DMK cult member (and his chanting "God and religion are distinct" gave it away, a classic Periyarite doublespeak mantra).
      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    3. Re:Do NOT expect a civilized society in India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all. --John F. Kennedy

    4. Re:Do NOT expect a civilized society in India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hinduism is the root of all evil in India.

      Hindu parents covertly **brainwash** their children to coerce other kids as per caste hierarchies.
      Hindus are seeding **racism** in our society using their Family aka Caste Names.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Indian_family_names

    5. Re:Do NOT expect a civilized society in India... by jawahar · · Score: 1

      We ruled India and we will rule the World.

    6. Re:Do NOT expect a civilized society in India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. India on the Atlantic by splashbot · · Score: 1

    What's with this "planning on both sides of the atlantic" business, India is not on the Atlantic Ocean, contrary to Mr Columbus's imaginative Thoughts. Come on... pfft

  35. Ah! The India bashers abound on /. by petercr · · Score: 1

    Has anyone even considered the facts properly. The US is collaborating on projects with India not outsourcing stuff.
    Suddenly there's a huge din and cry as to why space exploration is waste of money for India when so many go hungry yadda yadda..
    The indian space org is based on real civilian needs. Most of it is used for weather forecasting to help fishermen and farmers plan their activities, to help in rural literacy programs esp in remote areas. Oh wait, almost forgot to add one more thing, post 9/11, it was India's agency that provided their satellite photos to help the US plan the attacks on the Taliban. India does not send satellites to prove they can too unlike some country (rolls eyes) that did something similar because the Soviets were the first to send a man to space. Most of the launches are based on real needs. Atleast inspite of all the corruption, the political leaders do not get in the way of the space agency when it plans and does so for the benefit of its masses though they do take some of the credit.. hey the Indians're not perfect either.
    And now, once the two countries decide to co-operate, all most of you can do pass "Bangalore, we have a problem" and other "funny" comments.

    Peter

    1. Re:Ah! The India bashers abound on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh wait, almost forgot to add one more thing, post 9/11, it was India's agency that provided their satellite photos to help the US plan the attacks on the Taliban"

      Do you have any certified web links (not conspiracy sites please !) on this ?

      Also, this decision by NASA is mostly on cost saving - while they concentrate more on their Mars missions.

  36. Awesome News by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    Let's hope that cooperation in space lends momentum to helping India modernize.

    India has pursued a positive course in emerging from colonialism in terms of its robust democracy and liberal society (not glossing over internal conflicts, just not enough space to go into it here), and for the most part in its relations with other nations in the world. Sadly, its economic progress has not proceeded along the same lines due to protectionism, corruption, and inability to build up its infrastructure.

    China, on the other hand, has pursued a negative course in emerging from colonialism. Repressive, brutal, nearly always confrontational with its neighbors, and with a collective chip on its shoulder the size of, well, Outer Mongolia. Left unchecked, we're not further than two decades away from its attempting the Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere a-la Chinese. South Korea and Japan, ASEAN, and even Russia would feel a lot better if there were a robust India next to it to help contain its aggression and convert it into something positive.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  37. Re:GOD DAMNIT by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    anti-corporate

    I can't help feeling sorry for the poor devils working in unsafe conditions making things for pennies while the corporates sell them for hundreds of dollars. One may say that progress would be unattainable without the cheap help. Yet, decades ago when shipping was more expensive and risky, there was a sustainable local industry, albeit with lower standards and less propensity to sue for every little work injury, as well as lower wages.

    Automation and technology will likely eliminate the exploitability of many countries. Then there'll be a fairer interaction, like the "cooperation" of space programs rather than sending third world astronauts to far off planets.

    What will happen to business? Many startups can get a foothold in the increasingly competitive world by exploitation, but treating different countries as equals will mean more costs and scarcer resources. It may well be time to ramp up the drive to visit other heavenly bodies.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  38. NASA and the Indians by Emanuel+Goldstein · · Score: 1

    Combining the work ethic of the Indian people with NASA's know how is one of the best idea they have had. Exploration of the moon and beyond is a wonderful idea and will lead to great advances in technology, medicine and science. I hope they are successful and that this leads to a new golden age. That is the hope at least.

    --
    BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!
  39. Wait 'n watch by cyberobe · · Score: 1

    You mean NASA jobs going from immigrant Indians to resident Indians? (Read Indians as Indians+Chinese). Never mind, if US economy and dollor continue on their current path, you will become cheap, enough to get something outsourced to you some day.