Slashdot Mirror


Tellme Founder Tells Yahoo Not to Worry Over Microsoft Takeover

Tellme founder and previous Yahoo co-founder, Mike McCue hasn't spoken to past-partner Jerry Yang since the Microsoft takeover bid for Yahoo, but he wanted to let his friend know that being acquired by Microsoft isn't such a terrible proposition. "After being assured that Tellme would be able to retain its Silicon Valley office, identity and quirky culture, McCue negotiated an $800 million sale to Microsoft and agreed to stay on as general manager. It's a decision that he says he doesn't regret 10 months into the marriage. 'We are pretty much doing everything we were doing before - just a lot more of it,' said McCue, 40. Because of the vast differences in size, the Tellme deal obviously isn't an apples-to-apples comparison to Microsoft's proposed $40 billion acquisition of Yahoo, which contends it's worth even more money despite a two-year earnings slump."

117 comments

  1. I was in a MSFT acquisition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    They told us we could keep our independence but almost immediately a VP decided we should be assimilated.

    1. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by pdusen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny how you have no identity and gave none for your company.

    2. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Funny how you have no identity and gave none for your company. Microsoft Mindwipe 2007 (tm).

    3. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by Headcase88 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I hate how they totally changed the interface from Microsoft Mindwipe 2003.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    4. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by andruk · · Score: 0

      AFAIK there were no changes from Mindwipe 2003, that's just silly.

      Everyone knows that Microsoft has good reasons for changing interfac...*bzzzt* ...what was I saying?

    5. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks for this question, we are now number one result for Microsoft Mindwipe 2007.

      Yahoo!!!

    6. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by pdusen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Ah, hello troll. I love you guys! I was wondering when you'd be out to play.

      Seriously, I don't care if Microsoft is Nazi Germany. You can't just say "This article is wrong because I saw the opposite happen!" and then not offer any information to back up your claim. That's ridiculous.

    7. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how you have no identity and gave none for your company. We all saw Hotmail and MS is still the same company run by same kind of people. As there are thousands of people working at Yahoo I personally know one advanced engineer who was about to re-apply for Yahoo and cancelled his plans right after MS news leaked out. Basic as that, that "proposal" is actually hurting Yahoo right now.

      Posting this as AC since we are dealing with a search engine company here.

    8. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this question, we are now number one result for Microsoft Mindwipe 2007.

      Yahoo!!! Sadly, it doesn't even appear on the first page on Yahoo!. Shenanigans, perhaps?

    9. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by yiantsbro · · Score: 1

      Evil Shenanigans.

    10. Re:I was in a MSFT acquisition by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      Hey what's the name of that restaurant you like with all the goofy shit on the walls and the mozzarella sticks?

  2. Given Yahoo's assistance in Totalitarian China... by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...it'd be employees of Microsoft in that part of the world that need fear this takeover. Of course, when you let Wall Street rule the world, human rights gets thrown out of the window and into the next county.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  3. If Ms gave me $800 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't exactly be complaining about it.

  4. Who wouldnt be? by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Getting paid $800 million i would gladly let Bill Gates rape my company anyday. Asking someone recently given that kind of money what they think is pretty useless.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Who wouldnt be? by dattaway · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to the day when we all work for and are citizens of Microsoft. No more worries about competition, wars, or being sued for using Linux.

    2. Re:Who wouldnt be? by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

      Getting paid $800 million i would gladly let Bill Gates rape my company anyday Hell, for $800 million dollars, I'd let him rape me! That's a statement he can stand behind.
    3. Re:Who wouldnt be? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      t's a new low, even for Slashdot. Seriously.

      Get over yourself. Super duper seriously.

      Actually, GP makes a good point, albeit in a slightly flamebait fashion. What exactly do you expect the CEO of a company that was recently acquired by the 800 lb gorilla of the IT industry to say, other than cozy, uplifting platitudes?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:Who wouldnt be? by dattaway · · Score: 1

      You must not remember the old days when people made an honest living.

    5. Re:Who wouldnt be? by tsa · · Score: 1

      And when was that exactly?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    6. Re:Who wouldnt be? by Znork · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Asking someone recently given that kind of money

      It's not the money. While I'm sure the recipient of that kind of money would be hesitant to comment negatively, the keyword here is recently.

      Ten months into an acquisition and a company of Microsofts size has barely noticed it's got a new appendage. They probably haven't even finished connecting internal networks or handed out ID's, never mind hooking up finance and reporting systems.

      See if 'anything's changed' in five years, once functional units have been merged into the mainstay and the real estate unit wonders why they have this expensive office in silicon valley, the culture unit has been briefed in the new culture is busy holding chairthrowing contests, and 'identity' is something you put in the corporate directory and 'identity management' deals with.

    7. Re:Who wouldnt be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, for $800 million dollars, I'd let him rape me! You know, technically it isn't rape if you let him.
    8. Re:Who wouldnt be? by Macthorpe · · Score: 3, Funny

      For $800 million dollars, I'd put up a pretty convincing performance.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    9. Re:Who wouldnt be? by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Funny

      unless its like a settlement you get after the subsequent rape trial... You are correct though if you agree to the 800mil up front that makes you a high priced whore, not a rape victim.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    10. Re:Who wouldnt be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      potato pota... erf that doesn't work in comments

    11. Re:Who wouldnt be? by smitth1276 · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't useless. Their opinion is INFINITELY more valuable than yours, which seems to be based solely on what you think will make you "cool" on slashdot. Oh, and 1996 called... they want anti-Microsoft hyperbole back.

    12. Re:Who wouldnt be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      potato pota... erf that doesn't work in comments po-TAY-to, po-TAH-to--works for me. Let's call the whole thing off.
  5. previous co-founder? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    it's impossible to be a "previous co-founder" without a time machine. You're always the co-founder no matter if you're still with the company or not.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:previous co-founder? by DeAgua · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure that your tag should be:

      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm:

      SELECT * FROM internet WHERE search_term = @search_term ORDER BY Popularity

    2. Re:previous co-founder? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      it was a direct quote from the Slashdot April Fools SQL on Rails story's video :P I know it makes no sense as an SQL statement :P

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  6. Re:Given Yahoo's assistance in Totalitarian China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So I take it you've never bought anything made in China? Or is it only evil if other people help totalitarian governments and if you don't have to pay more money for your toys?

  7. Yahoo by Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo by Microsoft will give Google lots of headache. It won't be named MicroWho? It's going to be Yahoo by Microsoft..... YAHMic!

    1. Re:Yahoo by Microsoft. by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      Yahoo! Powered by Microsoft

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
  8. Re:Given Yahoo's assistance in Totalitarian China. by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What does that have anything to do with it? And nobody give me some smart answer- I mean directly, that has nothing to do with what we think about Yahoo's decisions about China.

  9. Tellme? by jo42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tellme is so popular I had to Google them to find out WTF they do.

    Either that or I live under a rock...

    1. Re:Tellme? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I was a tellme early adopter. They lied and cheated, and I went elsewhere. Ant this was before Win 3.1 AFAICR.

      I still have the documents somewhere, in case I ever get round to suing them. They are in the same league as Zango, and 180 solutions.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:Tellme? by hab136 · · Score: 1

      I was a tellme early adopter. They lied and cheated, and I went elsewhere. Ant this was before Win 3.1 AFAICR.

      Care to elaborate?
    3. Re:Tellme? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Informative
      It was a very long time ago, but the essence of it was that they claimed to be a low cost ISP, with free bundled modem. When in fact the modem was a lame 2400 baud thing when I was already operating 56k, and the "internet" they offered was a walled garden, which you could easily break out of, but if you did, you were billed at a hideous rate without warning, so that I ended up with huge bills.

      In short, their business model relied on deceptive practices, and overcharging. I recall endless bills for things which I had just clicked on, and was unaware would cost me.

      I was not young and naieve, but came from a background of Usenet and Fidonet, and saw no reason why this stuff should be chargeable.

      Cancellation was a chargeable offence too: you were tied to a lengthy contract.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    4. Re:Tellme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about http://www.tellme.com/ ?

      They seem to have started in 1998 which is well after Windows 3.1.

    5. Re:Tellme? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      They [Tellme] are in the same league as Zango, and 180 solutions.
      ... which still doesn't enlighten us as to what they actually do ...
      The Google top line result has the strap line "Tellme 800 services allow voice query for stocks, sports, news, weather, and horoscopes." I suspect that the "800" refers to the US "free call" telephone system, in which case that implies
      1. advertising all over the place (to pay for everything else)
      2. some significant voice-recognition processing power somewhere. (They also mention "VoiceXML", whatever that is. Sounds very SemanticWeb-ish.)
      3. Tellme (and hence MS) know all about what you're interested in at this moment in time, and are probably going to target the most attention-grabbing (read : distracting) adverts they can find at you
      4. the extremely slow-loading Flash (?) advert at http://www.tellme.com/ talks about some one who's interested in sports, but not interested enough to be doing his sport himself, someone who can't find a cup of coffee with his eyeballs in a city, someone who's stupid enough to not be at the airport in plenty of time, and someone who doesn't know how to manage her finances. All people to avoid, I think.
      So, unusually for an advert, it's quite informative. People who use Tellme are likely to be people you don't want to waste time on, or be in business with. After all, you can get all of that (apart form the stocks information) with a pocket radio while getting on with most other things and without the adverts.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    6. Re:Tellme? by jshazen · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have mod points, but rather than mod parent *un*informative, I thought I'd explain. You're either misremembering the company that you're talking about, or there was some other company called Tellme that went out of business.

      1) The Tellme that the article talks about is a phone automation company, not an ISP.
      2) Until recently, Tellme has had clients in the Fortune 100, and has not charged individuals to use the service. (Tellme does have a *free* service (1-800-555-TELL) for the general public.)
      3) Tellme was founded in 1999, significantly after win3.1 and 2400 bps modems.

      Disclaimer: I work for Tellme (a Microsoft subsidiary), but my comments do not reflect any official opinion or policy.

  10. Give up Flickr by tsa · · Score: 1, Funny

    I will give up my Flickr account the moment MS takes over Yahoo. That'll teach them!

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Give up Flickr by jzhos · · Score: 1

      right, they will be so scared.

    2. Re:Give up Flickr by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yeah I guess MS will blow off the whole deal now! ;)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:Give up Flickr by tsa · · Score: 1

      But seriously, what else can I do to make them know I don't like their deal? I just want to have as little to do with MS as possible.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  11. The 'Borg' icon really makes sense by giminy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the first time in a long time that the borg icon for MS makes entirely too much sense...you will be assimilated, etc.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  12. Re:Given Yahoo's assistance in Totalitarian China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oddly enough the original poster's comment had two sentences, the second of which was a general note about the effect of money. I simply wanted to point out that getting on a high horse doesn't have much effect when you're covered in shit yourself already. The US government and probably every single person on slashdot helps the Chinese government grow and maintaining it's power. We give it money, we give it economic growth, we give it technological progress and we all ignore it's continual humanitarian abuses. We argue that this is better in the long term ,we argue that we are actually helping the Chinese people and so on.

    Nonetheless every large company is China has probably had one government order or another requesting information on it's workers, or on it's customers or wiretaps or whatever. The exact same thing is done in the US, the police sometimes request things from companies and companies give that information up. If your company does business in China it can either follow it's laws or not do business there, no one seems to mind the former as long as they can save some money (including likely every single slashdot poster when they buy computer parts).

  13. Re:Tellme by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Informative

    I dunno about popular.
    But I know of them, because part of their service line is to do Directory Assistance matches which gleefully tells you they are "powered by Tellme".

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  14. McCue has no direct connections to Yahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Tellme founder and previous Yahoo co-founder, Mike McCue hasn't spoken to past-partner Jerry Yang

    This is wrong. McCue has no direct connections to Yahoo in his past. He founded Paper Software which was purchased by Netscape where he stayed on as a VP. He eventually started Tellme Networks with Angus Davis in 1999. Prior to Paper I believe he was at IBM.

  15. Biased by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not saying that the guy is biased but let's just think about this for a second. Anyone who've agreed to be bought by Microsoft has already found Microsoft to be a good match. In other words, if Microsoft wasn't a good match, the deal would have never gone through and we wouldn't have this article. It's kind of like asking a bunch of BMW owners what they think of BMWs. Most of them would have positive things to say, especially the new owners (which is similar in this case). To get an accurate picture we need to ask those who turned down Microsoft why did they turn them down as well as those who accepted the offer.

    To be fair, many of my coworkers are former Microsoft employees and most of them did have positive things to say about the work environment. Obviously, it wasn't the end all and be all of places since they did leave after all.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Biased by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't the he an employee of Microsoft?
      Surely he would be a brave person to bite the hand that feeds him... especially such a big hand, attached to a long arm at that.

      --
      BM3
    2. Re:Biased by name*censored* · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, but Microsoft's hand has it's fingers in a lot of pies, so it would be tasty to bite. Which means that umm..

      Wait, what were we talking about?

      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    3. Re:Biased by initialE · · Score: 1

      Conversely, anyone that doesn't agree to be bought by Microsoft knows that if they want your technology bad enough, they will just clone it. Citrix -> Terminal Services, Netscape -> Internet Explorer and IIS, Oracle -> SQL Server. They might not succeed, but in either case you're facing competition and uncertainty just by saying no.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    4. Re:Biased by DarkOx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I think you're point is generally correct SQL Server has little to do with Oracle. SQL Server is instread the poster child for why you never partner with M$ on a development project. M$ licensed Sybase for the core of SQL Server and the two oranization agreed to continue to share code. Now M$ went and spent all their engergy doing things very tightly coupled to Windows and therfore not useful to the cross platform Sybase product.

      They then marketed SQL Server more agressively and cheaper, sucking up all the oxygen as per usual. This has turned Sybase into pretty much a legacy vendor like Novell without Suse. Really its kinda similar to Windows and OS/2.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Biased by dirk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While it's true that he may be biased, asking people who have turned down MS won't tell you anything, because they have no knowledge of what happens when MS buys you. What this guy is trying to get across (for either his own personal reasons or as an MS employee)is that a lot of the fears and FUD you hear about MS taking over a company (they will just fire everyone and keep the tech, they will totally assimilate you and change your culture, they will just buy you and bury your tech and push theirs, etc)are not true. Asking someone who didn't get taken over by MS what MS does when they take someone over is just silly, as they don't know. If you want to know if something is true, you ask people who have been through it, not someone who avoided it because of the rumours.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    6. Re:Biased by autophile · · Score: 1

      Isn't the he an employee of Microsoft? Surely he would be a brave person to bite the hand that feeds him...

      Sure, if he spoke out against the merger, he'd be biting the hand that feeds him. But his third choice was to remain silent.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    7. Re:Biased by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What this guy is trying to get across (for either his own personal reasons or as an MS employee)is that a lot of the fears and FUD you hear about MS taking over a company (they will just fire everyone and keep the tech, they will totally assimilate you and change your culture, they will just buy you and bury your tech and push theirs, etc)are not true. Asking someone who didn't get taken over by MS what MS does when they take someone over is just silly, as they don't know. If you want to know if something is true, you ask people who have been through it, not someone who avoided it because of the rumours.

      But even a cursory examination of other incidences of MS buyout should prove him wrong, and you don't need to be in one of these assimilated companies to know.

      For instance, the "they will just buy you and bury your tech and push theirs" is certainly true. It happened to FoxPro, after all. FoxPro customers are still mad about this, after all this time. Secondly, look at what happened to Hotmail; it's nothing like it used to be when it ran on Linux (this also falls into the "they will totally assimilate you and change your culture" charge).

      Does anyone really think MS would let Yahoo keep doing things the same way after a buyout? Don't ask this loser with his tiny little company; ask Hotmail (oh, sorry, "Windows Live Hotmail"). I'm sure they wouldn't continue to run Yahoo on BSD servers, for one, and they'd be using the crappy MSN search engine too. And then why would they even bother keeping Yahoo Mail around? They'd just roll everyone over into Windows Live Hotmail accounts. Sounds like assimilation and culture-changing to me.

  16. Maybe, Maybe Not by OakLEE · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I think a good segment of Yahoo's workforce won't have to worry so much, an acquisition like this is not going to happen without dead weight being trimmed off.

    Assuming the merger occurs Microsoft, regardless of its promises, will have to start integrating Yahoo into MSN or vice versa. It would make no sense to run two competing operations under one roof. Thus we can safely assume that either MSN or Yahoo's upper management are toast, unless Microsoft is completely idiotic and wants to integrate the two, which would create all sorts of loyalty and corporate culture conflicts.

    After management, who gets fired next depends on what Microsoft is buying Yahoo for.

    If you believe what Microsoft says, it is buying Yahoo for engineering talent, then most of the Yahoo's content departments become redundant and will be eliminated, while the engineers and IT people stay.

    If you believe that Microsoft is buying Yahoo because MSN's content is shit poor, then the content people are safe. The engineers and IT people become redundant as Yahoo moves over to a Microsoft-based back end. (For those who think that's impossible, remember that Microsoft moved Hotmail from BSD to Windows 2k with relative efficiency.)

    If you believe (as I do) that Microsoft is buying Yahoo for its account/user base, then every employee at Yahoo is conceivably expendable since the value in Yahoo would lie in one of its raw assets (users) and not in the organizational structure of the company itself. Buying solely for the user accounts, would obviate the need for Yahoo as an entity.

    Regardless of how you view it though, Yahoo as a completely separate and intact operation under the Microsoft umbrella is impossible just because it competes on a lot of fronts with MSN, and unless Microsoft's plan involves completely dismantling its MSN unit, some consolidation of the two is going to have to occur.

    --
    The sun beams down on a brand new day, No more welfare tax to pay, Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light...
    1. Re:Maybe, Maybe Not by MBC1977 · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true...AOL Messenger and ICQ come to mind, though your probably right that the userbase is the real objective.

      --
      Regards,

      MBC1977,
    2. Re:Maybe, Maybe Not by norbac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming the merger occurs Microsoft, regardless of its promises, will have to start integrating Yahoo into MSN or vice versa. It would make no sense to run two competing operations under one roof.

      Not really. In the end all they want is online advertising. It may make sense to adopt a single advertising platform, but keep both properties (MSN, Yahoo) separate to appeal to the broadest possible audience.

    3. Re:Maybe, Maybe Not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would make no sense to run two competing operations under one roof.

      Sure it does, as long as Microsoft can build a critical mass in the ad busines to compete effectively against Google.
    4. Re:Maybe, Maybe Not by SargentDU · · Score: 1

      If you believe (as I do) that Microsoft is buying Yahoo for its account/user base, then every employee at Yahoo is conceivably expendable since the value in Yahoo would lie in one of its raw assets (users) and not in the organizational structure of the company itself. Buying solely for the user accounts, would obviate the need for Yahoo as an entity.

      That may be foolish, because one reason I use Yahoo! is that it is not Microsoft, and if acquired, I will leave Yahoo! like I would avoid a leper.

    5. Re:Maybe, Maybe Not by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you believe that Microsoft is buying Yahoo because MSN's content is shit poor, then the content people are safe. The engineers and IT people become redundant as Yahoo moves over to a Microsoft-based back end. (For those who think that's impossible, remember that Microsoft moved Hotmail from BSD to Windows 2k with relative efficiency.)
      I agree with the parent post in general, and even this point isn't bad, except for the "relative efficiency" part, even with the built-in "relative" disclaimer. Not only were there problems with the migration to Win2K (including a statement in 2001 that the migration had been completed, which was later retracted), but we also have to remember that Microsoft tried really hard to migrate Hotmail to Windows NT and failed. Microsoft acquired HoTMaiL in 1997, but couldn't migrate to NT at all, and only managed to make the Win2K migration 4 years after the acquisition. Since Microsoft had stated publicly that Hotmail was going to be migrated to NT, it's pretty easy to look at the whole story and say "ouch."

      I remember reading some internet columnist talking about the failed NT migration in 1999 or so, and I just found a description with references at the Wikipedia page on Hotmail. Specifically, the development history part and in the footnotes.

      It occurs to me now that Microsoft must have really believed the NT migration would not be hard, or the public statements about it before it was done would not have been made. The recent internal Microsoft e-mail exchange about the meaning of "Vista Ready" shows me that there are still a lot of decision-makers at Microsoft who really don't understand where their product sits in technical terms. They know its market position, but they don't appear know the real technical differences between Windows and other OSes.
      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    6. Re:Maybe, Maybe Not by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true...AOL Messenger and ICQ come to mind, though your probably right that the userbase is the real objective. People giving up ICQ didn't move to AIM, they moved to MSN Messenger. So AOL basically lost users to Microsoft.

      Microsoft-Yahoo? People will move to Google and hosting (with services) will move to Amazon.

      My "Yahoo mail" account was acquired in 1998, I know the exact time since I cancelled my Hotmail account right after MS bought them. The day this deal works, I am packing and going to somewhere else. Lots of people thinking exactly what I think and I am sure Yahoo lost users just by this "proposed deal" in the news. If it actually happens, they better tell their FreeBSD servers to prefetch deluser command ;)

    7. Re:Maybe, Maybe Not by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      While I don't doubt that this is true for you and a number of Slashdot folks, I'd be seriously surprised if over 1% of Yahoo!'s userbase would jump ship over it.

      (Now, if Microsoft changed a bunch of stuff that they liked about Yahoo! thereafter, that's another story.)

    8. Re:Maybe, Maybe Not by value_added · · Score: 1

      I remember reading some internet columnist talking about the failed NT migration in 1999 or so, and I just found a description with references at the Wikipedia page on Hotmail. Specifically, the development history part and in the footnotes.

      I knew the OP's comment was rubbish, but it didn't occur to me that Wikipedia had a page devoted to the subject. Thanks for the heads up.

      For anyone who hasn't seen the Wiki page, it's an interesting read. Even more interesting is the information cited in the footnotes. Admittedly, much of it is "old" history, but not so old as not to be relevant in any discussion involving Microsoft or their technology.

  17. Mike McCue did not co-found Yahoo by disassembled · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mike McCue is not a co-founder of Yahoo. Prior to starting Tellme in 1999, he founded a company called Paper Software, which was subsequently bought by Netscape, but he was never directly involved with Yahoo.

    The article is admittedly ambiguous about this point--it introduces Jerry Yang as a co-founder of Yahoo, and in the process, it inadvertently implies that he co-founded it with McCue.

    1. Re:Mike McCue did not co-found Yahoo by aguenter · · Score: 1

      "Tellme founder and previous Yahoo co-founder, Mike McCue hasn't spoken to past-partner Jerry Yang since the Microsoft takeover bid for Yahoo..."

      There's nothing ambiguous or implied in the way that sentence is structured. It pretty clearly states him as being a co-founder of Yahoo.

      You could make the argument of implication if it read "Tellme founder Mike McCue hasn't spoken to past-partner and previous Yahoo co-founder, Jerry Yang, since the Microsoft takeover bid for Yahoo..."

    2. Re:Mike McCue did not co-found Yahoo by disassembled · · Score: 1

      There's nothing ambiguous or implied in the way that sentence is structured. It pretty clearly states him as being a co-founder of Yahoo. The Slashdot story is both unambiguous and wrong in this respect. I was referring to the original article to which the Slashdot story links, which says:

      Mike McCue hasn't talked to Yahoo Inc. co-founder Jerry Yang since Microsoft Corp. ambushed the Internet pioneer with an unsolicited takeover bid a month ago. I don't think the author of this article meant to imply that McCue co-founded Yahoo with Yang, but I can see how the Slashdot editors read it that way. For the record, once again, McCue is not a co-founder of Yahoo.
  18. In other news... by imasu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Locutis of Borg tells Riker that "it's not so bad in here!"

  19. Interesting aspect by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
    But this seems to indicate that the bid on Yahoo was far below what it should have been.

    Maybe this means that the bid on Yahoo should have been $400 billion instead.

    But they should also consider the fact that a company is strongly depending on it's employees, and this means that if enough employees disagrees they just leaves and the purchase will be an empty shell.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  20. 800 million.... by seifried · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For 800 million dollars I'd be willing to tell people pretty much anything about how great MSFT is.

  21. Obligatory Futurama comparison by blake182 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brain slug infected man tells non-brain slug infected man not to worry about brain slug infection.

    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama comparison by iphayd · · Score: 1

      Would that be microslug?

  22. I wouldn't be so cavalier about it by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, there are hundreds of hungry VPs in Redmond and they have buddies who they might not mind seeing in Tellme's general manager seat. They're a lot better connected than he is.

    1. Re:I wouldn't be so cavalier about it by holygoat · · Score: 1

      Have you thought about the consequences that would have on employee retention?

  23. Oblig Simpsons quote by RSevrinsky · · Score: 4, Funny

    Moe: [slowly] It's not so bad, Homer. They...go in through your
                          nose and...they let you keep the piece of brain they cut out.
                          Look!
                            [holds up a jar with a piece of brain in it]
                          Ooh! Hello! Hello there! Who's that big man there? Who's
                          that?
    Bart+Lisa: [droning] Join us, father.
            Marge: [droning] It's bliiiissss...
            Homer: Nooo!

    - "Treehouse of Horror V"

  24. Tell me what the hell is Tellme ... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

    I had never heard of this $800 million company, so I immediately visited their website http://www.tellme.com/.

    Actually, that's a lie, after watching Flash load their site for about 30 seconds (on a 4 Meg broadband connection) I gave up.

    Can someone please tell me what this Tellme thing is please.

    1. Re:Tell me what the hell is Tellme ... by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      It took me less than 3 seconds on my 20 Meg connection, so you need to chat to your broadband provider.

      Not that you were missing much, mind - the website is pretty vague. Looks like directions/locations/directory services.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    2. Re:Tell me what the hell is Tellme ... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      THIS IS ZOMBO.COM!

      http://www.zombo.com/

      you can do anything....anything at all....

    3. Re:Tell me what the hell is Tellme ... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      30 seconds on an 8Mbit connection got me slowly up to 35% and then I bailed out. Whetever they do, they need to fire their Web designer and/or hosting company

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    4. Re:Tell me what the hell is Tellme ... by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Apparently, they are a

      provider of voice services for everyday life, including nationwide directory assistance, enterprise customer service and voice-enabled mobile search. because

      [...] [they] and Microsoft share a common vision around the limitless potential of voice as a way to find information, connect with people and enhance business processes, any time and from any device.

      `the limitless potential of voice as a way to find information'... whoever wrote that should be chaired.

    5. Re:Tell me what the hell is Tellme ... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      It took me less than 3 seconds on my 20 Meg connection

      20 MB/s unfortunately is prohibitively expensive for an individual - and probably most businesses, considering that 85% of all businesses have a gross revenue of less than £100,000 per annum - in most of the world.

      Tell Me again why I should care about a company whose message has been made unavailable to me through the needless use of bandwidth.
      Or perhaps that's what their business is really doing - in my day they called that churn and it's already been shown to be a failed business model !

    6. Re:Tell me what the hell is Tellme ... by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Except it's 20Mbps, not 20MBps, and it's only 5 times faster than yours, and it only costs me £35 per month.

      Seeing as you're using pounds, not dollars, you must be oblivious to the speeds available in your own country.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  25. he doesn't even have to be lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    You are right that they money counts, but the guy was probably rich anyway. He probably believes what he is saying. The thing he's not pointing out is that his was a friendly take over. That means that the board and management all the way down the line stay intact. Yahoo is a hostile takeover and that's going to be a nightmare. In this guys case, they clearly agreed with him and trust him. In the Yahoo case, they are automatically kicking out the top level and so will be changing the entire direction of the company. In Yahoo's case, they have to; as quickly as possible; put their own people in charge of everything. Just for the simple fact that the people at the bottom will realise that all their own projects and work are now threatened and will so many of them will hate Microsoft.

    I think that; if this is the best example they can come up with then the entirety of Yahoo should now be preparing for total war on Microsoft. History says that you can't work with or even discuss with Microsoft. There are only two possibilities. Be submerged into Microsoft like this guy or alternatively fight them with all your energy. The middle road of doing your own thing whilst not giving in as taken by Lotus, Borland, Netscape etc. and now handset manufacturers like Ericsson and even to some extent Nokia leads to long term Extinction. The mistake Yahoo has made is that it should have invested more into Linux but at the same time try to make that investment untouchable by Microsoft. As many people as possible should be trying to get the Yahoo board to agree to relicence their work projects under the AGPLv3. Things which will not allow MS to close them down just in order to destroy them.

  26. Reminds me of .. by ElektroHolunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    "They float all down here, Richie. When you're down here with us, you'll float too!"

  27. Phophecy by adolf · · Score: 1

    I like your comparison, and would like to use it as a source of causation!

    I really like my BMW. It turns 13 (and 160k) soon. We've only been together for about three short years -- far longer than a lot of tech companies ever last, but it's a very short time in BMW years. Since the acquisition, this car has taught me much, such as:

    1. How to countersteer. I thought I'd already known how to countersteer from my years of driving a Firebird, which was loose like a two-dollar whore. I've since learned that all that an American car can teach is how to handle slight corrections at relatively low speeds, since they suffer from such comparatively lousy handling. By the time I get the rear end of the 325i to break loose, I find that the car is invariably either going sideways into oncoming traffic down a rain-slicked hill at 50MPH, or headed sideways toward a concrete wall at more than 80MPH. It is thus a far better teacher than the Firebird, and this makes me an even more attentive and alert student. (Though I swear that my beard grows another grey hair every time it decides that I've got something new to learn.)

    2. Thou Shalt Not use Aftermarket Pads and Rotors, lest Thou shall Suffer Interminable Brake Squeal, and Lo, heads will Turn.

    3. Driving and working on the BMW is a lot like operating a UNIX box in that the car, like UNIX, is perfect. If something isn't going right, it's obviously because I've done something wrong. It might seem to the lay person that the rear shock mounts, which were plainly designed to rip themselves apart, and the alarmingly-expensive-to-fix/astoundingly-expensive-to-prevent way in which the differential may exit vehicle (!) while ripping a huge hole in the sheet metal that it bolts to, but make no mistake. These seemingly faulty items do not detract from the pure and honest perfection in which it was created. And, much like ksh, more, yacc, and dd's stupidly unique command line syntax, these characteristics do defy any clear explanation as to why they exist. But the Lord works in mysterious ways, as they say, and I think it's just God's will that one become proficient at fixing the rear end of an E36 BMW, just as one should spend some months trapped in ksh (instead of bash) while using more (instead of less) in order to fully appreciate all the simple beauty that life offers every day.

    Based on this, I'd like to conclude, based on my experience as a BMW owner, that a Microsoft buyout of Yahoo would entail the following:

    1. Microsoft will learn from its younger acquisition how to start with a simple and universally popular resource, and then turn it busy and hideous, only to simplify it again, before finally letting just some of the bloat back in, just like yahoo.com. This plainly suggests that, with Yahoo's teachings, whatever follows Vista is sure to be an improvement. Unless they manage to turn themselves into a sausage creature first.

    2. Clearly, this means that Yahoo will continue to run FreeBSD (however dead it may be) instead of some incarnation of Windows, lest the noise of grinding metal deafen all who bear witness.

    3. Since BMWs are like UNIX, and UNIX is like FreeBSD, then all of these are perfect. However, if Microsoft is to Windows as Yahoo is to FreeBSD, then Windows must also be perfect. This part obviously should NOT be permitted to transpire; A perfect incarnation of Windows would create a time rift with a strong likelihood of sending us all back to the stone age. It's shameful that the EU seems to be rather impotent against Microsoft, because the US sure isn't going to do anything even AFTER Diebold gives the next election to McCain.

    Which means, in conclusion, that we're fucked. In the event of a Microsoft-Yahoo buyout, please collect your cyanide tablet by the door on your way out. Thank you.

    (Aren't you glad you used a car analogy on Slashdot?)

    1. Re:Phophecy by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      I don't have any mod points, so I give you an honorary funny.

  28. Re:Tellus! by Ox0065 · · Score: 1

    Soooo????? TellUs!!!!! WTF do they do?

    --
    thx e
  29. not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSN also turned over evidence. It was not just Yahoo. The only SE that did not turn over direct evidence was Google (though they do censor, like the others, but they point out that censoring took place, unlike the other 2).

  30. Sounds much like... by jshark · · Score: 1

    "Drink the cool aid. We'll all be fine."

    --
    If you're gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough.
  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Difference between Yahoo and MS by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (Thanks to a hotmail victim friend)

    Safari 3 on OS X Leopard:

    Hotmail: "This is hotmail light version, to get all hotmail features upgrade to Internet Explorer 6"
    Yahoo: "Yahoo mail beta works with Safari 3 now!"

    That is the difference between MS and Yahoo.

  33. Re:Given Yahoo's assistance in Totalitarian China. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    ...it'd be employees of Microsoft in that part of the world that need fear this takeover. Of course, when you let Wall Street rule the world, human rights gets thrown out of the window and into the next county. Since when Microsoft is heroically fighting for human rights in China?

    Stop that illusion, no Fortune 500 company with billions of dollars plans will stand up against Chinese politics. Some do it publicly, some doesn't. The so called "good guys" bothers me more since they think I am stupid.
  34. cliff notes version. by eshefer · · Score: 1

    brief summery of the text:

    "I, for one, welcome our new redmondian overlords. You should too"

  35. Re:Given Yahoo's assistance in Totalitarian China. by NewAndFresh · · Score: 1

    Isn't this where import taxes are supposed to come into play?

    --
    Welcome to Costco, I love you.
  36. it won't be as bad as you think??? by peektwice · · Score: 1

    The cash that they'll give you and your shareholders to acquire Yahoo will make the ass-ramming less painful, unless you use Yahoo or work in the trenches at Yahoo. Then it'll just be a regular painful M$ ass-ramming.

    --
    Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
  37. It's power, not money by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    After $100m or so you really have no use for money. You can but a couple of holiday homes in interesting locations and park a few cars in each driveway and moor a yacht off each private jetty and never need to worry about money again.

    After that, money is just power. If you only get $800m instead of $900m you'd feel screwed over. You gave Bill some of your power.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  38. Look at what happened to Bungie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft gave the once-proud company wads of cash and pretty much clusterfucked their creativity. C'mon, let's work on ANOTHER version of Halo. Microsoft will rape Yahoo, pure and simple.

  39. What the hell are you talking about? by holygoat · · Score: 1

    Tellme has never been involved in anything like that.

  40. "10 months into the marriage" - "lol" by unity100 · · Score: 1

    and only "lol" is all i can say.

    if how a marriage is to be in future was to be understood from its first 10 months - man, i cant even find anything to say on that

  41. Who gives a flying fuck by melted · · Score: 1

    It's an 80K+ people company. Couple dozen folks leave - big deal. Makes it easier to move these jobs to Hyderabad.