Slashdot Mirror
How To Communicate Science to a Polarized US Audience
Prescott writes "Given the divisions in the US around subjects like evolution and climate change, scientists face challenges in how to communicate good science to a polarized US public. Speakers at the recent AAAS meeting talked about how scientific information is delivered to and understood by a public that interprets it via personal beliefs, religious and otherwise. 'The talks were organized by Matthew Nisbet, a professor of communications who is a proponent of the framing of science, in which communications techniques borrowed from the political realm are applied to promote scientific understanding. As such, a number of speakers advocated specific frames for publicly controversial scientific issues. Unfortunately, the use of those frames appears likely to generate controversy within the scientific community, and several speakers noted that science faces challenges that go well beyond communicating knowledge to the public. There were some hints of a way forward that might work for both the scientific community and the public, but the challenges appear significant.'"
Use small words.
When communicating with a highly polarized audience, I harken back to my days studying freshman chemistry and the old saying that "like dissolves like".
Therefore, communicating with a highly polar audience requires a highly polar solvent. I find that ethanol works wonders in that regard.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
Precisely. Newton didn't care that the Catholic Church became angry when he said the earth is Not the center of the universe.
He just spoke the truth and passed on the knowledge to anyone who would listen.
The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
Perhaps we should have some forum on transmitting accurate historical information to a deeply confused audience.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
As a somewhat non-conformist Anglican, living in the Enlightenment era, he likely wouldn't have given a flying one *what* the Catholic Church thought.
However, he possibly *did* care that somebody didn't even do the fundamental research to be able to distinguish between himself and Galileo.
Stop trying to trick us into believe your lies, Devil!
There's a good response to all of that.
"Wow. I feel really sorry that you're going to die a God-damned ignorant mystic. Pardon the pun."
Ed R.Zahurak
You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.
Galileo != Copernicus. I know they looked a lot alike, but trust me, they were different people.
The government can't save you.
"Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig."
-- Robert Heinlein
Have gnu, will travel.
You can't take the sky from me...
Did Netwon give up when the Germans bomber Pearl Harbor?! Hell no! And it ain't over now because when the going gets tough.... ...uh... ...the tough get going! Who's with me? What the fuck happened to the scientists I used to know? Where's the spirit? Where's the guts, huh? "Ooh, we're afraid to talk science to a polarized US audience, we might get in trouble." Well just kiss my ass from now on! Not me! I'm not gonna take this.
Newton didn't care that the Catholic Church became angry when he said the earth is Not the center of the universe.
No, Newton said that Leibniz was not the center of the universe.
[Insert pithy quote here]
> (after I'd pointed out that we could easily find objects in the sky well over 6k light years away, and if they were in fact several million/billion light years away, how could the light be reaching us if the universe were only 6k years old?).
Actually this could be possible if the universe expanded very rapidly. In fact the universe is 13.73 million years old, but 93 billion light years across.
What kind of idiot would drink something that was harmful them just because it was sweet and tasted good?!?
*POP* Damn this Coca Cola is good, gotta get my fix of this...
Okay, back to my rant... I mean really, that has to be the definition of stupid!
I only look human.
My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
Well, I've done some inspired coding with Bombay Sapphire. Tanqueray, not so much, and the ol' Knotty Head will have you debugging for a week after.
Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
How deceitful and despicable of the Democrats to try to get elected by invoking a large, invisible thing in the sky. Good thing Republicans wouldn't do something like that!
That's a common misperception among people who haven't read his 23rd century memoirs describing his adventures in time travel.
"Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
Given this information, can you prove Newton != Copernicus?
Copernicus != That Steve guy from down the street. I know Copernicus, Galileo, hell, even Newton, have all taken credit for the ideas of Steve, but now is the time to set the record straight!
To pray is an old english way to say "request". I pray thee, pass the salt. Why you should think that is superstitious is puzzling to me...
It is, if you are alone.
I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!
But its so much EASIER to just call them stupid.