Slashdot Mirror
Study Shows Males Commonly Mistake Sexual Intent
seattle-pk writes "Males are apparently clueless when it comes to interpreting sexual intent from females, according to a recent study (PDF) from Indiana University's Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences. Men were found commonly to perceive more sexual intent in women's behavior than women were intending to convey. (A campus survey showed that 68% of college females had an experience where a male mistook signs of friendliness for affection.) However, the study also shows that men were quite likely to misperceive sexual interest as friendliness. 'Rather than seeing the world through sex-colored glasses, men seemed just to have blurry vision of sorts, overall,' according to the article. If you're a male who ever mistook the meaning of a barista's smile, looks like you're not alone."
Is this from the same study group that found males like beer?
"She slapped me, that means she wants my bod!"
Table-ized A.I.
women have blurry behavior
I blame geof's speakers.
thanks for posting this info on /. we need all the education about the opposite sex that we need (never mind the mothers whose basements we hermits live in)
Things sure were simpler when we were monkeys.
Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
Why's this story in the "Humor" section? What's so funny about a 30-year old virgin?
Oh, wait..... HAW, HAW!
"Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
Begin with simple statements:
Put down the 20 sided dice and come have a drink with me.
Your guild can raid without you for a night, lets go see a movie.
We can make out while your program compiles.
I know you enjoy moderating that silly Slashdot forum, but we could be having sex right now!
When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
Me is sorry for poor engrish. You ar enco... ecnu... please tell me, when i is wrong.
Au cointraire, mon frere, students are very representative of people who lie on questionares about sex
This study is not worth the e-paper its not written on. That goes for almost all other questinaires about sex too.
Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
Speaking entirely subjectively, my own sexual intent, as a woman, is like a ratchet with a very large reset button, with a mischievous monkey in attendance. The monkey keeps on pressing the reset button at random intervals. A man can interest me, and things can go very well right up until he says or does entirely the wrong thing (and don't ask me to define 'the wrong thing'). At this point, I completely lose interest and go back to being a nun. This is essentially why the man needs to spank the monkey.
In conclusion, we're all idiots.
Obviously. You should be asking her to play Mario Kart.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Always marry an ugly girl, that's the only kind. She'll never ever leave you, and if she does you won't mind. Let's not forget, ugly girls need lovin', too! But then again, discussing sex with women on slashdot is like discussing Ubuntu with your grandmother... neither party knows what the hell is going on...
Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
What? Playing Smash Bros drunk? What an idiotic idea! When you're drunk, your hand-eye coordination suffers. I mean, would you want to lose in Smash Bros? TO A GIRL?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
"I mean, would you want to lose in Smash Bros? TO A GIRL?"
If I got laid afterwards, YES.
This is another case of blaming the user for confusing interfaces,
and another case of blaming hardware for a software problem.