Slashdot Mirror


Ray Tracing To Debut in DirectX 11

crazyeyes writes "This is breaking news. Microsoft has not only decided to support ray tracing in DirectX 11, but they will also be basing it on Intel's x86 ray-tracing technology and get this ... it will be out by the end of the year! In this article, we will examine what ray tracing is all about and why it would be superior to the current raster-based technology. As for performance, well, let Intel dazzle you with some numbers. Here's a quote from the article: 'You need not worry about your old raster-based DirectX 10 or older games or graphics cards. DirectX 11 will continue to support rasterization. It just includes support for ray-tracing as well. There will be two DirectX 11 modes, based on support by the application and the hardware.'"

14 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Poster is really excited by pembo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If one's thing sure. Pity DirectX11 will work on so few platforms.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  2. Surprisingly forward thinking on MS' part by Froze · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or maybe just obvious to anyone in the industry. Since clock speeds are bounded and not getting any faster and you can only lower voltages so much before signals get lost in the noise, the only way forward is in parallelism and ray tracing is wondrously parallelifyable (is that a real word?).

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
    1. Re:Surprisingly forward thinking on MS' part by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe Carmack is wrong?

      Doom and Wolfenstein were clever back in the day, but it wouldn't be the first time that a famous expert was blindsided by a paradigm shift in their field.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  3. Vista only, BTW. by snarfies · · Score: 1, Insightful

    DX10 is Vista-only. I'm going to guess DX11 will be the same. Which means I'll never see it in action, as I will switch to Linux before I switch to Vista.

  4. Re:Call me old and grumpy by Nimey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shit. That reminds me that I'm going to have to ignore Slashdot tomorrow because it'll be full of unfunny-because-they're-trying-too-hard stories.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  5. Re:Only available with Windows 7 by Vigile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is very obviously a lie or joke for early April fools. I didn't know Slashdot fell for them. Did anyone actually read the last page?

  6. Re:Call me old and grumpy by StarvingSE · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's how it used to be before the OMG PONIES era...

    --
    I got nothin'
  7. Windows XP will soon go out of print by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DX11, like DX10, will probably be Vista-only. So will new PCs built with these new chips, if only because Windows XP will have been taken out of print by this July.
  8. Re:Only available with Windows 7 by Shade+of+Pyrrhus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Yeah, for anyone who reads up to the last page, it seems pretty clear that it's not true. Something like this would be more likely announced by Microsoft PR a good while before release, in order to grow some hype.

    TFA states

    "As DirectX 11 is a work in progress, Microsoft does not have an exact timeline. But the source claims that DirectX 11 could be part of Windows Vista by late 2008."
    I don't know where these guys get their information, but even Microsoft does planning ahead of time for products they create - especially if it's to be released the same year! The absurdity climaxes at the third page...do yourself a favor and read it for a little laugh.

    "They also plan to have DirectX 11 ready in time to debut with Windows Vista Service Pack 2"
    Service Pack 2? Sure, SP1 wasn't an improvement and SP2 might be needed - but, again, plans for this would have been more well announced or planned by Microsoft.

    Sorry guys, article is simply BS.
  9. Re:Call me old and grumpy by timster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even that would be passe at this point -- years ago Google announced GMail on April 1 and with the claim that they would offer 1GB of storage a lot of people were tricked into thinking it was an April Fool.

    At this point the obvious creative thing to do would be to skip April 1 and make everyone think that Slashdot had changed their ways, and there would be much rejoicing... then have a hideously annoying gag the next day.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  10. Re:Only available with Windows 7 by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it just me or is this a stupid April fools joke? It's not funny, it's like it's just trying to get your hopes up.

    Ugh.. Get ready for a whole day of hilariously deceptive articles like this..

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  11. Re:Call me old and grumpy by Fneb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're in Malaysia (as stated in the Microsoft's comment bit), which is quite a bit ahead of Europe and the US in terms of time zone. If you look at the date on the article, its '01 April 2008'. So this isn't a pre-April Fool's April Fool's, it just seems like it.

  12. Re:Only available with Windows 7 by im_rotting · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A joke? There is definite possibility of an almost maybe that this is true.

  13. Re:SAY NO TO THE GAY AGENDA by AmigaMMC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually God didn't create anything. Adam, Eve, Steve and all the others CREATED God. Big Difference! And, forgive me if I ask, what is a Gay Agenda and in which bookstore can I find one? I asked my gay friends but they said they stopped using agendas once they graduated from school, now they use laptops. Gateway, Dell and HP don't have Gay Laptops so I'm assuming these people are using generic ones.