Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Discover Teeny Tiny Black Hole

AbsoluteXyro writes "According to a Space.com article, NASA scientists have discovered the smallest known black hole to date. The object is known as 'XTE J1650-500'. Weighing in at a scant 3.8 solar masses and measuring only 15 miles across, this finding sheds new light on the lower limit of black hole sizes and the critical threshold at which a star will become a black hole upon its death, rather than a neutron star. XTE J1650-500 beats out the previous record holder, GRO 1655-40, by about 2.5 solar masses."

36 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They say LHC-001 will be even smaller!

    (But who will be there to measure...?)

    1. Re:That's nothing... by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's talking out of his hardon-collider.

    2. Re:That's nothing... by sayfawa · · Score: 5, Funny

      There may already be microscopic (more like picoscopic) black holes all around us. The thing with black holes is they are only dangerous if you get close to them. If they are small they can whiz right through us without hitting anything, much like many other particles that pass through us all the time. I'm not saying that creating one would be a good idea, but if, on the off-chance, one were created by the LHC it will probably be innocuous. I wish I could make those sound less like famous last words.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    3. Re:That's nothing... by Tringard · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would guess it is to denote the first to come out of the Large Hadron Collider.

    4. Re:That's nothing... by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 4, Funny

      So thats where all my socks keep going!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    5. Re:That's nothing... by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's talking out of his hardon-collider.
      How exactly did we get from talking about black holes, to talking about gay porn?

      ....

      Actually, nm, don't say it, it's too obvious....
    6. Re:That's nothing... by inode_buddha · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nope. Umatched socks are simply the larval stage of coat hangers.

      --
      C|N>K
    7. Re:That's nothing... by wtansill · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not saying that creating one would be a good idea, but if, on the off-chance, one were created by the LHC it will probably be innocuous. I wish I could make those sound less like famous last words.
      What would be really scary is if the chief scientist says "Hold my beer and watch this" just before pushing the master ignition switch...
      --
      The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    8. Re:That's nothing... by Kingrames · · Score: 3, Funny

      So what you're saying is that the odds of getting sucked into a black hole are proportional to its size. That sounds like something you could write a couple hundred to a couple thousand pages on and get a doctorate out of.

      But... it needs more string theory.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    9. Re:That's nothing... by phirst · · Score: 4, Funny

      001 = First black hole created by LHC. Some people are afraid the LHC-001 is going to destroy the Earth. Presumably you're not one of them, what with your three digit black hole serial numbers...
    10. Re:That's nothing... by electricbern · · Score: 2, Funny

      Eventually every household will have it's own blackhole. Then we will need IPv6 serial numbers for them.

      --
      alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
  2. Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But XTE J1650-500 is so bland! I think we should name it Mooseknuckle.

  3. LHC countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this the point where they say we'll need to re-think our theories on black hole evapouration too? But first, let's switch on the LHC and see what happens...

  4. Black-hole... sheds new light... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    HILARITY!

  5. We weren't the first by cryptoluddite · · Score: 4, Funny

    I see we weren't the first to build a large hadron collider.

    1. Re:We weren't the first by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wikipedia says Goatse.cx was launched in 1999, but Hello.jpg was on IRC before then, so the black hole much have been created quite a while ago quite a while ago.

    2. Re:We weren't the first by treeves · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yuck. I hate those artificial ones. They're full of preservatives. Give me a good old-fashioned, all natural, non-GMO, organic black hole any day.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:We weren't the first by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be new here - 99% of /.ers can easily sustain singularity.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  6. Awwww, little baby one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It may look cute now. But they grow up.

  7. Goldilocks by Dopamine,+Redacted · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, we've now discovered the biggest and smallest black holes known to exist within about a week of each other.

    When we find the most average, space bears will come and blast us into porridge.

    Astronomy kicks ass.

    1. Re:Goldilocks by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Funny
  8. Completely Off topic by ijakings · · Score: 1, Funny

    But is anyone else seeing these Russian bride adverts all over the site?

    True theyve probably got a good market to advertise to, Helena wont need as much inflating as your LatexLove3000 but it just seems odd to see them all over Slashdot.

  9. Re:15 miles across? by Bemopolis · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is the theoretical time before this black hole evaporates through Hawking radiation?

    About 10^68 yr. Bring a book.

    Bemopolis
    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  10. "this finding sheds new light" by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

    "this finding sheds new light" I'm pretty sure it doesn't.
  11. Size does matter by HangingChad · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's not the size of your black hole that matters, it's how you manage your singularity.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  12. Oh shit... by neokushan · · Score: 5, Funny

    If that happens, what are we going to do!? Capitan Picard hasn't been born yet! Hell, even Kirk isn't around yet....

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    1. Re:Oh shit... by evilviper · · Score: 4, Funny

      If that happens, what are we going to do!? Capitan Picard hasn't been born yet! Hell, even Kirk isn't around yet....

      Not to worry, the Enterprise is speeding around the Sun as we speak... Space-whales told them to.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. What the article fails to pont out is ... by celtic_hackr · · Score: 5, Funny

    This newly discovered Black Hole is the final result of a Large Hadron Collider, that caused a microsopic black hole on the third planet formerly circling the former star now known as 'XTE J1650-500'. So, this is not a naturally occuring black hole, but an alien-created one. Sadly this alien species is now extinct so they can't tell us how to avoid their mistake.

  14. Relax by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 3, Funny

    as long as Stephen Hawking is still alive, I am sure he can handle it. After all Stephen Hawking beat all the other great scientists in poker with Commander Data in the far future, so he should be smarter than Picard or Kirk. If anyone knows how to reverse a black hole it would be Hawking.

    Besides never apply a Star Trek solution to a Babylon Five problem.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Relax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But what happens when we apply Battlestar Galactica morals to Star Trek and try to solve them with Babylon Five technology?

    2. Re:Relax by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Funny

      You end up on Moya, fleeing from the Peacekeepers. What else would you expect?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  15. Atkins? by JeffSchwab · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd love to know XTE J1650-500's secret. I've tried diet and exercise, but I'm still only down to 3.9 solar masses and 16 miles across.

  16. Re:Probably Something Stupid by pseudochaos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure you can measure what's going on past the event horizon of a black hole. All you have to do is make your camera's velocity exceed the force created (or rather possessed) by a photon going at the speed of light, and presto! You now have a camera that can probe farther into the gravimetric field of a black hole than light by itself.

    Unless you're one of those General Relativity literalists. *shudder*

    --
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
  17. Re:Probably Something Stupid by Ecuador · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry to break this to you, but you are rather mediocre at technobabble.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  18. I dunno, but... by OneoFamillion · · Score: 4, Funny

    for those wanting to find the article later, I strongly suggest Slashdot's own search instead of googling for the words "teeny", "tiny", "black" and "hole" :|