Slashdot Mirror


TiVo Patent Victory Over Dish Network Upheld

Thomas Hawk writes "An appeals court today shot down Dish Network's last chance to avoid a multi-million lawsuit verdict won by TiVo over their time shifting DVR technology. In addition to having to pay TiVo a minimum of $92 million, Dish Network will also now have to honor a court injunction to turn off DVR software to most of their customers. I hope Dish Network customers like commercials with their daily dose of Dr. Phil."

35 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. The shit's going to hit the fan by JonTurner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Americans are a complacent lot. They'll tolerate taxes and fee increases, regulation, government snooping, abridgement of century-old (and God given) rights, etc. with maybe one in ten thousand even bothering to pick up a telephone or a pen and contact their congressman or senator.

    But if you fuck with their television, you'll see angry roving mobs take to the streets that make "21 days later" look like a tea party. I suspect this will not end well.

    1. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know you joke, but it's the truth. Why else do you think the government organized a huge coupon program to help people get the converter boxes? And kept pushing back the changeover date as well...

    2. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You accept DRM. Acting on the presumption that the consumer is a criminal before the fact is ample evidence that the system - not the consumer - is broken.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    3. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by Cheesey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If he does, then he's not in the minority. I bet 99% of the people who read this post are XBox, PS3 or Wii owners: I think the DRM on those systems is tolerated so widely because it just works. Even nerds who understand the implications are willing to buy into it.

      Some people object to DRM on ideological grounds, but not many. It's like free software versus commercial software. You can decide to use only free software because it fits your personal ideology, but most people use a mixture of free and non-free software. If good free software doesn't exist for a task, then they pay up. Equally, we would all prefer to have no DRM, but we can tolerate it if it means we get to do something that we wouldn't otherwise be able to do.

      --
      >north
      You're an immobile computer, remember?
    4. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Use is not synonymous with acceptance. Toleration or passivity in the face of it is; personally, I'm active in a number of ways, from not allowing DRM of any kind on the commercial executables we produce, to creating PD software that demonstrates the fallacy of the GPL type of approach, to pestering my representatives to stop creating legislation that presumes citizens are criminals absent probable cause, oath or affirmation, and warrant. I donate to causes that support this view, and speak against causes that criminalize legitimate action.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    5. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I disagree. Blu-Ray and HDMI and HDTV and IPTV are all hot technologies with consumers right now and all have very intrusive DRM.

      I think Vista is having trouble in the market because consumers perceive it as incompatible, slow, unstable and annoying (with its attempts to protect users by using a million dialogs). Vista will win out despite consumers because Microsoft has the strength to force a noisy minority to comply. (it's a significantly large minority though!)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As long as you continue to replace DVD players with Blu-Ray players. And continue to upgrade your equipment to DRM-enabled versions, you are accepting DRM. As long as there demand for DRM there will be supply. And providing demand is acceptance when alternatives exist and are actually cheaper.

      Alternative to HDMI - component video, dvi
      Alternative to Blu-Ray - DVD (which has laughable DRM)
      Alternative to iTunes - DRM-free MP3 download(amazon, etc), CDs that are not protected(harder to tell)

      ps - try as we might, we will not be able to defeat the GPL empire. I do MIT license and PD software. But it just gets bundle with a bunch of GPL stuff anyways. GPL's model always wins even if it's the wrong model.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by multisync · · Score: 2, Funny

      Alternative to Blu-Ray - DVD (which has laughable DRM)


      It's DRM none the less, and it is (if I'm not mistaken) a felony to circumvent that DRM in the US. Also, how many VHS tapes are available for rent or sale at your local video store? Watch as studios slowly squeeze out the DVD and force those pesky "consumers" to "upgrade" to Blue-Ray.

      Alternative to iTunes - DRM-free MP3 download(amazon, etc), CDs that are not protected(harder to tell)


      Sure, if you live in the US. Amazon does not sell MP3 downloads to foreign countries. I've read about other services, but none that I have seen offer either the convenience, price and selection of iTunes. If anyone can recommend an alternative that doesn't require me to pay a monthly fee (I prefer ala carte, thank you) and offers a decent selection outside of the US, I'd love to hear about it.

      You are correct about CDs, and I encourage people to continue to buy them for the superior (to iTunes, anyway) audio quality and for the peace of mind that you can rip 'em, put them in a plastic storage bin in the basement and they will likely still be available to be re-ripped if necessary in the future. Until, that is, drives that are able to play CDs become as scarce as drives that can read 5-1/4 floppies.

      (btw, I still have my old Akai turntable and every vinyl album I ever bought, but most suffered irreparable damage at the hands of a dumb-ass teenager who didn't appreciate how precious his music collection would be to him in his old age).
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    8. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by Jonner · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're painting with some very broad strokes there. I receive completely DRM-free and free of cost HDTV broadcast all the time. AFAIK, the FCC neither requires nor allows any kind of DRM on ATSC broadcast, though it has been threatened and defeated (hopefully indefinitely) in the form of the "broadcast flag."

      Also, IPTV does not refer to any particular system or standard, but just the general approach of sending TV over IP. I don't know how many different IPTV systems there are, but there are probably some that don't use DRM.

      Just to nitpick: HDMI doesn't require HDCP all the time, which is why you can plug an HDMI display into a DVI output using a simple converter cable and you can plug a DVI display into an HDMI output as long as the signal is not HDCP encrypted.

      However, I do agree with your main point that DRM is becoming more pervasive and most people buying into it are completely unaware or apathetic. Because I'm opposed to DRM on grounds of principle and because it limits my DIY options, I get my TV and movies from broadcast ATSC and DVDs (the DRM is inconsequential) instead of digital cable and BluRay. When bypassing BluRay DRM is as easy to bypass as CSS, I'll get some of those. Of course, the former options are a lot less expensive too, and I like saving money. I am very aware that not very many people are going to limit their options like I do.

    9. Re:The shit's going to hit the fan by deblau · · Score: 2, Funny

      But if you fuck with their television, you'll see angry roving mobs take to the streets that make "21 days later" look like a tea party.
      I live in Boston. We can get pretty angry at our tea parties.
      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  2. I tried by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was trying to think of something really witty to say, something that would totally make the parent rethink their post and question their whole thought structure on Americans... but all I could come up with was this Family Guy quote:

    "Who touched the thermostat?" ...how sad is that?

  3. Dish DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI this has no effect on anyone with a newer model Dish DVR, i.e. they aren't going to take it away from you. New software was pushed out 6 months ago to replace the infringing software. If you have a real old one, now is a good time to upgrade.

    1. Re:Dish DVR by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, 'next-generation' software was pushed out for all models. Nothing is going to stop working. The article description is highly incorrect.

      --
      Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    2. Re:Dish DVR by danielsfca2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about you or your parents, but our Dish DVR wasn't hard to use in the slightest. It was far superior to the crap Comcast pushes.

      And I'm sure plenty 60-year-olds, no offense intended towards my elders, couldn't figure out how to do more than pause and rewind on TiVo either.

      (I've never had a TiVo because I refuse to pay $15/mo for the rest of my life for a few kilobytes of guide data. When I moved to a no-dish apartment, I built a PC-based DVR that kicks ass).

  4. Responses by ArkiMage · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tivo's:
    http://investor.tivo.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=304285

    Dish's:
    http://dish.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=304293

    The latter includes these tidbits:

    The decision, however, will have no effect on our current or future customers because EchoStar's engineers have developed and deployed 'next-generation' DVR software to our customers' DVRs. This improved software is fully operational, has been automatically downloaded to current customers, and does not infringe the Tivo patent at issue in the Federal Circuit's ruling.

    "All DISH Network customers can continue to use their DVRs without any interruption or changes to the award-winning DVR features and services provided by DISH Network.

    "We intend to appeal the Federal Circuit's ruling to the United States Supreme Court."

    1. Re:Responses by BACPro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If DISH network has corrected the problem with a new software download, why do they need to pursue this to the US Supreme Court?

      It would seem that it is SOP for a manufacturer to EOL a piece of equipment. Tell the users they need to upgrade. There will be some gnashing of teeth, some users will flee, but if the new product is better... Some people need a shove to move on.

      Having said that, I would be pissed off if someone told me I had to abandon a perfectly functional piece of kit and upgrade. I sure a community of terrorists that have hacked their own distro of Linux onto it to maintain functionality could be found. Someone would do it because they could.

      Any idea how this affects Bell Express Vue in Canada? I notice about 3 months ago we received new software that did more things that were TIVO like. Record all eps, record all new eps, priorities and so on...

    2. Re:Responses by 1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If DISH network has corrected the problem with a new software download, why do they need to pursue this to the US Supreme Court? It might have something to do with the $92M judgement.
    3. Re:Responses by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Funny
      ***Since they did the f*cking thing has failed to record the shows I want to watch about half the time.***

      I'm pretty sure that someone -- Verizon? Microsoft? -- has a patent on not doing what is requested about half the time. Another patent infringement? Dish's patent problems may not be over.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  5. RTFA by mrsam · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, Dish can (and if you RTFAed, they will) appeal to the Supremes.

    But, true, Dish has a tough hill to climb. The Supremes only accept a small percentage of all appeals. Dish's goose is mostly cooked.

  6. Re:This will just make tivo look bad by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Knowing Tivo they begged and pleaded for months to get Dish to pay for a license. Either Tivo asked for too much or Dish was uncooperative.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  7. Re:new software was pushed out 6 months .. by Teran9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can look up the press releases from Dish that say that they have updated their software. They are appealing because they don't want to have to shell out the bucks for past transgressions.

  8. Re:This will just make tivo look bad by chris234 · · Score: 2, Informative

    DirecTV used to, but that's irrelevant as this is about Dish Network.

  9. Re:Its not going away by rajafarian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pet peeve - you infringe somebody's patent - not violate it.

    Yeah but violating it sounds funnier.

  10. Re:This will just make tivo look bad by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm rather biased against Echostar, having worked there briefly. Dealing with their HR department several years later to obtain some records was just as unpleasant as actually working for them was. I usually get knowing nods and comments from recruiters whenever I discuss it, so I know it is not just me who has had these sorts of problems with them.


    If their legal department is anything like their HR department, talking to them was pretty much useless. I'd be surprised if Tivo had any recourse other than to sue them. Although I hate software patents and think that many DVR-related ones are completely retarded (TV Guide has one for the guide grid format, for example) I can't suppress a certain amount of glee that this misfortune has fallen upon Echostar. So I'm just going to point at them and go "Ha-ha!"

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  11. Re:This will just make tivo look bad by PuckSR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, but knowing Dish Network...they probably weren't interested in paying someone for technology that they developed.

    The entire patent is bogus. Tivo combined time-shifting with a digital storage device and an on-screen guide. Hmmm. Time-shifting is not patented by tivo. Digital storage of video is not patented by tivo. Dish Network and DirecTV actually hold prior art on the on-screen guide. This seemed like a fairly obvious usage of common technologies.

    Remember. Dish Network is the same company that turned all Viacom channels off for a few weeks because they didn't want to give in to pushy business practices by Viacom. I am not saying this is good or bad, but I am saying that Charlie Ergen(Dish CEO) has big testicles.

    So, I doubt it was that Tivo asked for too much money. I think the fact that TIVO asked for money at all would have put them off.

  12. Re:Die, TiVo by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps it's that Tivo "just works"? If I wasn't gainfully employeed and had tens of hours a week to burn, I'd get a MythTV box. If I wanted to be frustrated all the time when watching TV, I'd get a Comcast DVR system. Tivo's benefit isn't software, or the guide data, it's usability. Those of us with disposable income don't mind paying $15/month to have all of our shows waiting for us and not having a problem when we try to watch them.

  13. Re:Die, TiVo by vrmlguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, not me personally but the guys I went to college with in the mid 90s. They had cable fed into TV tuners and streaming to drives, controlled automatically by TV listens off the Internet. This was an obvious convergence of 1) TV tuner cards, 2) fast-enough processing at affordable prices, and 3) cheap-enough storage. TiVo came along and boxed it all up, then patented what other people had already been doing. Except that you haven't described TiVo's patent. They cover using a circular buffer so you can watch while you're streaming, without saving to a file.

    Even thought I own a DishNetwork receiver, I think that TiVo was right to get their patent and Dish Network shouldn't have fought as hard as they did. TiVo isn't a bunch of patent trolls; they built and marketed hardware which other people copied.
    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  14. Re:Die, TiVo by netringer · · Score: 3, Informative

    TiVo has patents on the "jump to tick" on the timeline and the 8 second jump back among other things.

    No. Those features DID NOT exist until Tivo came out with them, and you won't see them on any other other PVR - due to the patent.

    TiVo's UI and remote and functionality is the absolute best thought out.

    I'm going to have to give it up soon, thanks to DirecTV and TiVo divorcing, and TiVo deciding to diss legacy (Lifetime) customers with the removal of discount rates for additional units.

    I really hate that situation.

    I'll be signing with AT&T UVerse as soon as they get my house address listed as green in the database. I wish they used CableCARDs so I could keep my HD TiVo. *sigh*

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  15. Re:Unlikely by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Replying to this to get a post near top:

    DISH WILL NOT have "to turn off DVR to most of its customers". Anyone using the 622 or 722 (what they ship now as their DVR offerings) is NOT affected. Software was upgraded months ago specifically to get around the patent. If you have a far older DVR, then all this means, is you'll get a free upgrade to the new model, rather than paying for it. A pain in the ass though the patent is, a travesty this is not.

    Mmm, pimping your own misleading blog FTW! It's not like many people in the comments of his own blog entry he submitted didn't point out this RATHER MAJOR DISCREPANCY... but oh noes! Removing scaremongering does not help pageviews, does it?

  16. Re:Its not going away by mr_matticus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, infringement is one method of violation, so you do both. Infringement is more specific and usually the case with a patent claim, but violation is not incorrect.

  17. Bell Expressvu by GrBear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone know how this is going to play out insofar as Bell ExpressVu receivers in Canada?

    They (Bell) use the identical "Echostar" PVR boxes as our neighbours to the south. Sounds to me like Bell is going to have a huff of angry customers too here shortly.

  18. Directv and DRM by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is related, in some way.
    I have a crappy, buggy Directv HR20 HD DVR. I received a message a couple days ago.

    Effective April 15, 2008, DVR recordings of PPV movies will be available for 24 hours of unlimited viewing after purchase. Major movie studios have required that satellite and cable providers alike may no longer allow their customers to view these recordings for longer than 24 hours. During the 24 hour viewing period, you will continue to enjoy all of your DVR features such as pause and rewind.
    It seems if I were to record a PPV movie (I don't, I don't like their PPV prices) I now have only one day to watch it before they are going to remotely erase it from my DVR.
    Unbelievable.
    Now there's DRM for ya!
    --
    .
    1. Re:Directv and DRM by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 2, Insightful
      At the risk of getting flamed into oblivion by the "DRM BAAAAD" crowd... surely if you PPV a movie, you're paying for the right to watch it once. Like going to the cinema - if you want to see it again, you buy another ticket. This is pretty much how Sky advertised their 'Box Office' PPV service - "it's like a cinema in your living room" (IIRC).

      Except in this case you can live-pause the movie while you refill your tub of popcorn, grab another beer, or whatever. Then if you missed a few seconds you can kick it back and watch it again so you don't miss any of the plot.

      For what it's worth, I can't honestly think of any movie I've watched in the last ~4 years that I'd actually watch again...

  19. Re:Unlikely by NateTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to mention that Dish like other large companies who have lost patent cases in the past, will simply "license" whatever tech they infringed upon. The lawyers get paid (again) and Tivo gets a well-deserved cash-flow fix.

    Whoever thinks Dish will simply turn off DVR service with the flick of a switch, is sorely lost when it comes to even simple business tactics, let alone creative thinking.

    --
    +++OK ATH
  20. Re:Die, TiVo by netringer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OMG! The "8 second jump back"! What an amazing, novel concept! Hold us back, lest we froth at the mouth at this momentous innovation!


    Spoken like a person who never had it.

    The innovation is not only that it can jump back 8 seconds, but that there is a single button right your finger to do it. What's obvious is rewind. A one-button "Wait! What was that just now?" rewind is and was novel.

    The jump back is so essential, I've caught myself reaching for it on the car radio.

    I held off buying an iPod until the Apple genius showed how I could backup podcasts sorta the same way (it needs to be ONE button).

    I want jump back in life. I tried to replay things I see out the window!

    What slashdotters should keep in mind was that the founding TiVo developers were Linux hackers - one of us. I suspect those pioneers have been gone from TiVo for years - lost during the early hard times, but we should appreciate that they built what we wanted. That legacy is reflected that TiVo never really came down hard on TiVo hacking. They even knew the hackability was a sales feature. I was surveyed as such years ago.

    Again, what's sad is TiVo's inability to come up with a business model with the film industry and TV services fighting them at every step. It never helped that you couldn't explain the product in a sentence.
    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly