Slashdot Mirror


African Americans and the Video Game Industry

An anonymous reader writes "African Americans spend more money and time playing video games than whites, yet only 2% of game developers are black. This past week, MTV's Multiplayer blog interviewed five black game industry professionals for their perspective on race in the industry. Intelligent Gamer summarizes and highlights portions of this lengthy series of interviews."

68 of 646 comments (clear)

  1. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really?

    Who cares?

    I never knew there had to be any specific percentage of "African-Americans" participating in any activity.

    And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"?

    1. Re:Who cares? by spintriae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? No. Can you point out where in the article any African-Dane was referred to as an African-American?
    2. Re:Who cares? by SL+Baur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a dumb article. The vast majority of *top* game designers/programmers are Japanese. With few exceptions the best games are all Made In Japan. Do I care if there may not be a single gaijin of any color employed in a Japanese game company? Nope. So why should it matter in the US (where the games are nearly all crap anyway)?

    3. Re:Who cares? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's no such thing. They'd be called Danish.

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Miseph · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as I know, "black" is acceptable most of the time, but a little on the blunt side. I use it, and despite being a scrawny white guy I've never gotten my ass kicked for saying it or even gotten a dirty look.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    5. Re:Who cares? by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups.

      That's utter bull. Every nation does the same, even the ones that insist they don't. If you have blocks of people in your country who have a separate culture and separate rules that they want to live by, it's foolish to ignore that and refuse to classify them.
    6. Re:Who cares? by urbanriot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree completely. The US has so many problems with race, because they seem pay so much specific attention to racial differences and continually bring up 'problems' or 'insight' into these differences. It's especially amusing when groups that don't belong to these minorities are the ones discussing these 'issues'.

      Who cares?
    7. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      blocks of people in your country who have a separate culture and separate rules that they want to live by And what culture/rules do the people labelled as African Americans live by?

      Classifying people in such a way doesn't make sense. The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black. Grouping them into a sub-culture based on their ethnicity is really stupid, and a testament to the persisting prejudice that runs through the US. This is a perfect example of modern, widely practised, racism.
    8. Re:Who cares? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A certain percentage of the US population is X: white, therefore it is expected that an equivalent percentage of American Y: Chinese Restaurant owners are too. If they are not, it indicates some sort confounding variable that might (and in this case almost certainly does) indicate some sort of social inequity that needs to be addressed. Maybe it's not not social "inequity", but personal choices made by all parties involved. Sure, with different values of X and Y, your mileage may vary.
    9. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as I know, "black" is acceptable most of the time, but a little on the blunt side. I use it, and despite being a scrawny white guy I've never gotten my ass kicked for saying it or even gotten a dirty look.

      I've told my Ethiopian (and decidedly black) boss that the clients I'm expecting are black, or reminded him that it was the black couple I'm refering to, not the Filipino or Chinese or White couples he saw me with earlier.

      What other distinction am I supposed to make? "The tall people with dark hair and brown eyes"? From his office 40' from the front door he can observe their skin colour and estimate their height but their eyes are a tad more tricky.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    10. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To simply call one an 'African-American' because of skin color implies that 'African-American' is a color which it is not but a hijacked term for what it really means. Language evolves. The term "African American", like it or not, is applied to people who are black - true geo-ethnic heritage rarely comes into it (and your example is purposefully misleading - the term "African American" is not just confined to people who have been born in Africa, but also used to describe descendants of African immigrants).

      Besides, you miss the point: by classifying people in this way, we presume that they share commonalities (such as culture or "rules" as the GP puts it) when in fact these things are stereotypes.

      Put simply, why is an American with African heritage an African American, when a white American with European heritage is simply American?
    11. Re:Who cares? by xigxag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your link misses the entire point of the term "African American," which is not a fancy P.C. word for "black people," but a term used to identify people in a specific cultural group, with certain overall traditions, customs, and apparently gaming habits. It's come into commonplace usage because it's a unique phrase which sets that group off from other cultural, ethnic and racial groups in America. Exactly like Pennsylvania Dutch, who are called "Pennsylvania Dutch" even though they aren't really Dutch and don't all live in Pennsylvania. And, check it: someone might actually be from the Netherlands and move to Pennsylvania, oh no, what do we call them?

      Regarding black Americans and the notion of "well, let's just call them black Americans." True, you could do exactly that. But how is it more accurate? I'd venture to say that there are extremely few black people who are truly "black" skinned, and lots who are on the pale side of brown. They're just called "black" by convention, even if it's not 100% precise. Furthermore, America doesn't equal the USA, it's two continents. We call USA-ians "Americans" also by convention. There's no escaping it, we're stuck using a non-precise moniker one way or another. "African American" is just one more, and happens to be the one that people generally find less offensive when compared with Negro, Afro-American and nigger. It leads one to wonder, is the constant self-righteous outrage over the term "African American" based on logic (I've argued here, no) or based upon an anger that the blacks among us have the gall to object to being called whatever the hell we feel like calling them?

      To answer the parent post's question directly, obviously black people in Denmark aren't African-Americans, just like Russians aren't Poles, even if they wind up in the same country. But if by chance a black person from Denmark moves to the US and gets called African-American, it's not going to cause the universe to self-destruct. Real world categories are heuristic, not absolute.

      As for the pic of Chiwetel Ejiofor, who cares? Oops, maybe some ijit misidentified him as African American. What does that prove? I accidentally called my Scottish friend Irish one day, According to Genius Maddox, I guess my dumb mistake means that Scotland and Ireland don't make any sense.

      Now, on to people of color. No argument from me: that's nauseatingly P.C.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    12. Re:Who cares? by t0rkm3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, they were invented as a means to create separation so that benefits can be awarded based on a particular racial profile.

      I'm Native American therefore I am _entitled_ to certain benefits. African-Americans, Asian Americans, Native American (Non-Polynesian) are all ethno-types that are treated differently by college scholarships, gov't jobs, gov't benefits, and EOE demographics.

      Maybe if we didn't have to categorize ourselves for this that and the other, then we wouldn't spend so much time worrying about which bin we belong in.

    13. Re:Who cares? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Australia we really dont care too much.

      Would we get that same viewpoint from an aboriginal?

    14. Re:Who cares? by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups. Wow, that's utterly insane. Please, what country are you from? Would you care to describe how your country is different? Heck, anything to support your statement would be nice.

      Since Denmark was mentioned, maybe you should read some news--there have been some major riots and political happenings there over religion/race within the past month!

      I'm by no means claiming the US is perfect--it's not. But look at Australia--beach riots a year or two ago over Muslims. Look at France--ghettoization and discontent from Muslim/African populations that is hard to find an equivalent of in America in the last several decades. Balkans--banned from soccer matches for racist taunts. Chinese--discrimination against Uighur and Tibetan citizens. And where I've come across the most openly racist (against black Africans) people--Egypt. People don't even pretend.

      Hell, if there is one constant across the world it's racism..

      FWIW, I've heard Cuba actually has a remarkably egalitarian society--at least with regards to race--but it's so hard to hear reliable things about Cuba that I don't know..
    15. Re:Who cares? by k3r3nsky'sr3v3ng3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. I'm not really sure how it is in the north (I live in AL) , but we had this black speaker come for our black history month assembly in February and talk to us for about three hours about "heroes of the African-American community". He, who claimed to have a degree from Tuskeegee on civil rights, always referred to blacks as "African-American". Of course, we got the usual droning on about the history of slavery and civil rights (but oddly enough, affirmative action was never mentioned). The thing that got me was that Lyndon Johnson, despite granting blacks their civil rights, didn't get mentioned once in the speech. Of course, most ordinary people still refer to blacks as blacks and whites are referred to as whites and hispanics (whose population is rapidly growing in the south) are referred to as Mexicans. Unfortunately, many of the people, black, white, or otherwise, do a very poor job of disproving stereotypes of their particular ethnic group. Many blacks drive cars with big ass rims blaring terrible rap/r&b music. Many whites drive their full-size trucks with the stars and bars stickers and straight-pipes blaring some awful country music. It seems to me that ethnic groups are compartmentalized and stereotyped because many among them do their best to be as distinct as possible. Usually its just the media and activists that try to snuff-out any intelligence by using hyphens. Its almost a double standard, people want their hyphens and recognitions and affirmative-action benefits, but they get all pissy about stereotypes.

      --
      "We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security." Dwight Eisenhower
    16. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Language evolves. The term "African American", like it or not, is applied to people who are black - true geo-ethnic heritage rarely comes into it (and your example is purposefully misleading - the term "African American" is not just confined to people who have been born in Africa, but also used to describe descendants of African immigrants).

      False. Ask someone from the West Indies if they're "African American" and see what they say. It's a stupid politically correct catch-phrase invented by whites too afraid to say the word "black" or "negroe" and who thought "coloured" was too passe (and overly generic).

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    17. Re:Who cares? by markdavis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then why is it that "Africian Americans" refer to "European Americans" as "white"? Do you think Caucasians are any more "white" than Negros are "black"?

      I think what irritates people the most about the term "Africian American" is not that it is not particularly accurate, but that it conveys some special social standing that is not equally applied to all other racial groups.

    18. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fact: Black activists in the 1960s started calling themselves "African-American" instead of Negro in order to connect their fight for civil rights to the various independence movements in Africa happening at the same time. It caught on more over time. Malcolm X noted the term in his autobiography.

      Fact: That still doesn't mean everybody with black skin is African-American or that the term is any less nonsensical or over-used.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    19. Re:Who cares? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're both right. If you need to describe someone on appearance alone, most people in the US would not object to the word "black". A certain subset of people who would be described as "black" choose to identify themselves as African-American.

      It is no more complicated than that.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    20. Re:Who cares? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With few exceptions the best games are all Made In Japan.

      Wow, that's stirring up a hornet's nest. I'm calling BS, or at best "matter of taste", on that one buddy.

    21. Re:Who cares? by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And I'm a white guy who was born in Africa and is now an American citizen. I have no problem referring to myself as African-American just to see the look on a person's face. Or being called white, or telling American born blacks who refer to themselves as African-Americans that they aren't 'African' enough.

      I don't know that I've vocalized it but I've often wondered where the white women were at when I walked into a bar.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    22. Re:Who cares? by Hucko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Direct hit. I'm a taxi driver and while I had a negative opinion of the welfare benefactors I had the same opinion as gp until I began taxi driving. Australia is racist... unfortunately. I am forever having people hop into my cab and begin a conversation with a phrase similar to "How do you put up with the Aboriginals?" I now respond in kind with a simple "Aboriginals? Nah, they are pretty good most of the time. Every troublemaker I've had with has been trouble with the Caucasians... much like yourselves..."

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  2. Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why must everything be devolved down to race? I do not care if developers are black, white, green, purple, etc.. as long as they make a good quality product. The question should be, are the developers putting out a quality product? In my honest opinion, game developers fail in this task 60% of the time. It may sound like I do not want Diversity, on the contrary, I want diversity. Diversity is what helps keep things fresh and new. I just think we spend too much time worrying about race and not enough on quality. This is my opinion, like any opinion, it may not please everyone. No offense is intended or meant.

    1. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't hear anyone complaining that a lot of basketball teams are mostly (or at least disproportionately African-American). Chances are its that way because they have the most talent and not cause the coach hates whites. I would hope by this point any reasonable company would hire based on skills and not on some basis as ignorant as race. If there aren't a lot of African-American game programmers, its probably because there weren't any qualified candidates that applied, that there are higher caulcasian per capita in the area, or because perhaps African-Americans are perhaps less inclined to the line of work (seen arguments along these lines for women so maybe it applies here too?).

  3. Is this really surprising? by pokerdad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this the natural result of the socio-econic situation of said racial group in the US, the high cost of college in the US, and the fact that most employers in said industry want a college degree?

    1. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. More african-americans are poor, and video games are a very cheap form of entertainment. Also, poor people have less educational opportunities.

      This is not about color, this is about money.

      If you want to talk about race, talk about why more african-americans are poor. The games thing is just a symptom.

    2. Re:Is this really surprising? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >> If you want to talk about race, talk about why more african-americans are poor.

      The real reason is rap music and BET. If you're filling your head with fantasies about rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling) on a 24x7 basis, it's no wonder that you turn out violent and illiterate.

      But the same thing is true of some white people with their "pro-drunk driving and wife beating music". Just look at the literacy rates of people who listen to Lee Greenwood and Toby Keith: It's next to zero.

      It's not a shock that people who listen to Toby Keith end up being jack-booted jingoists or people that listen to Jay-Z and Dr. Dre end up morally bankrupt.

      It's just simple programming:

      Garbage in Garbage out.

      Until you understand how this process works, you're not likely to be a game developer.

    3. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't this the natural result of the socio-econic situation of said racial group in the US, the high cost of college in the US, and the fact that most employers in said industry want a college degree?

      Nonsense. I'm in Canada and the High School I went to was full of lower class people living in bad apartments and rooming houses. The people who moved on and did something with their lives were the ones who showed motivation and determination; nothing to do with skin colour.

      Man do I ever get tired of hearing these stories about how the poor blacks can't afford college because society is holding them down. I went to school with Blacks (African and West Indies alike), Whites, Asians, Indians (both from India and the Native Canadian variety), Sri Lankens, Pakistanis, Europeans and a whole host of every other "ini" and "ean" you can imagine. Some had their parents paying their way but most were there through part time work, savings, grants, scholarships, loans and student lines of credit. I don't care where you're from or what your background - if you want something you work for it. If you don't, sit around and complain about how unfair life is.

      But hey, let's make sure to placate "visible minorities" by giving them specialized scholarships! Or, if you're not dark enough but you have the right set of genitalia you could always apply for a scholarship for women! When did scholarship money become about what a person looks like rather than their drive, ambition and abilities anyways??!

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    4. Re:Is this really surprising? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's what being poor means.

      Me, my dad was an engineer, and coincidentally(?) I did pretty much the same thing, went through college, and now make a middle-class living. It never really occurred to me to be a politician, or an entrepreneur, or a pro athlete. Even now I don't have a clue how one becomes those things. Could I become something different if I plunged in and figured it out? Probably (except pro athlete), but - and here's the point - I didn't. I traveled the road that was before me (which luckily put me at about the 90% percentile of earners in the US). What if I'd been born poor? How about you?

    5. Re:Is this really surprising? by Secret+Rabbit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1) This is about something in the US NOT Canada.

      2) There IS socio-economic relation between poverty and Blacks in the US.

      3) There IS basically ZERO students loans programs in the US.

      4) Stop applying your life experience to a country in which it does NOT apply.

      5) I am Canadian.

      But a question. Did these people that "moved on and did something with their lives" go on into the games industry? Because, that is what we're talking about after all.

    6. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's troll because it isn't politically correct. Factuality be damned.

    7. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If life isn't unfair you shouldn't complain about it?

      Complaining is intended to achieve what, exactly? Is it going to make people realize the err of their ways and usher black people into the gaming industry and anywhere else they feel slighted? Or is it intended to them give extra incentives to blacks and other minorities so that when they do enter the work force they're resented by their co-workers? "Oh, (s)he's an affirmative action hire."

      Or life isn't unfair for black people in the USA right now?

      Strawman. Life is unfair for everybody starting the moment you're born. Get over it. You have two choices; sit and moan or get up and do something to make your life more fulfilling, for whatever definition of fulfilment you may have.

      What, centuries of racism just vanished in the last 40 years when lynching became embarrassing?

      Oh boo hoo. There are still ignorant people out there. I'll ask again; does affirmative action help, or hurt the cause of minority acceptance in the work place?

      Have you ever heard an otherwise racially neutral person utter a phrase like "Yeah, it's easy to get a job if you're a ${racial_slur}!"?!? Is it more fair to swing the pendulum in the opposite direction and discriminate against the Anglo Saxon Caucasian Males because we've had it so good up 'till now?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    8. Re:Is this really surprising? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >A small hint for you; if you go looking for it, you can find various forms of discrimination everywhere you go. Keep looking; I'm sure you're only helping the cause.

      As a Canadian, I don't think you could even begin to know. I invite you to come down to South Carolina and see it for yourself. We do things like redistrict black people so that their votes don't even count.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    9. Re: Is this really surprising? by PAKnightPA · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I would disagree. I think you imply that listening to music about "rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling)" makes one desire to drop out of school, join a gang, etc. This is not true. For example, A very large portion of my music library is this kind of music. I personally like it a lot. I would go so far as to call some of Dr. Dre's work classic. Yet I attend an elite university, and certainly wouldn't ever think of committing violent felonies.

      What you are saying is the same thing Jack Thompson says about violent video games. Rap music doesn't turn you into a gangbanger any more than playing Counter Strike trains you to be a violent killer. Frankly, I am surprised you were modded up by the same people who would probably mod you way down if you were agreeing with Mr Thompson. Oh well...

    10. Re:Is this really surprising? by Starrk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's troll because it isn't politically correct. Factuality be damned. There is more than mild political incorrectness in that post.

      If you're filling your head with fantasies about rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling) on a 24x7 basis, it's no wonder that you turn out violent and illiterate." Since he's talking about the wealth of black people as a whole, the implication here is that black people as a whole are likely to be violent and illiterate. Not sure if that's what he meant, but it comes across as a gratuitous insult. Which would be trolling.
    11. Re: Is this really surprising? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Playing a musical instrument is even better for you. Just do a quick search:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=music+makes+you+smart [google.com] I did. That search returns just as much information contradicting your point as supporting it. This one says:

      Here's where the Mozart madness began. In 1993, the journal Nature published an article by scientists at the University of California-Irvine. In their experiment, students listened to a Mozart sonata, a relaxation tape, or nothing at all for ten minutes, and then took a spatial reasoning test. ...

      And even after a 1999 review showed that 12 subsequent studies had failed to verify the famous 1993 one, people still believed in the magic of Mozart.
      ...

      That's right. There's a catch. In a University of Toronto at Mississauga study, music has been shown to increase IQ points in six-year-olds who took weekly singing or piano lessons. If your kids learn to sing or play an instrument, they just might become smarter.

      So, yeah, PLAYING an instrument may increase your intelligence - but most of the links in your search trying to link listening to intelligence are (surprise!) selling classical music products.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    12. Re:Is this really surprising? by Starrk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh and if you believe gangster rap causes a lot of real-life violence, I hope you believe many video games also cause real-life violence. After all, both claims are based on the same "logic".

    13. Re: Is this really surprising? by floodo1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      your friends turn you into gangbangers. DUH.

      but maybe you don't like to hear that, so maybe its about how the streets feel dangerous, and television makes the streets feel dangerous. probably about how television, movies, and games make it "seem cool to be in a gang." It might have something to do with very little adult guidance. It might have to do with being poor, living in the ghetto, and having nothing and nothing to do. it might be that a gang provides you with the family you never had. it might be that you can't make decisions correctly and need help.

      all of these reasons support "Garbage in Garbage Out" but also show that music is far from the only or most important factor. The parent's parent fails to realize that people might be attracted to the music precisely because they are illiterate or already have fantasies of rape, murder, or general mayhem. It's quite possible that the music represents and outlet, not an input

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
  4. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm "african american", even though I was never alive in africa. I also develop games and program as a hobby.

    The funny thing about the geeks of my generation, is that most of us don't really care about race. You're a noob if you don't know how to recompile your kernel, not because you happened to be born a specific hue.

    Didn't everyone get the memo that the media doesn't really represent the people anymore? There isn't much to get over.

  5. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The difference is - slaves in US were of a specific race, different from that of their masters. So, it is easy to recognize those who descended from slaves, and keep milking the "underprivileged" story forever. Interestingly enough, new immigrants from African countries get to essentially piggyback onto the same story even when they are not descendants of the slaves and were never subject to discrimination in US. Oh well, every groups of people looks for competitive advantage.

  6. In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I gotta say, it's VERY rare I see any black people at programming related events. But.. it's also pretty rare to see women. A connection? Perhaps.

    More than any other group I've come into contact with, programmers typically seem to be socially-stunted and have personality and mental issues (particularly depression, narcissism, and semi-autistic disorders). Thankfully, these issues tend to translate well into becoming great programmers.

    In comparison, most black people and women I've come across, tend to be more outgoing and sociable. If I had the social skills most women and black folks seem to have, I probably wouldn't be a programmer either, because there are a lot more interesting things to do in this world if you don't mind interacting with regular people.

    So perhaps we shouldn't lament why there aren't more women, blacks, whatever, in the software industry, but feel some relief that they're not mentally damaged enough to find the industry that interesting in the first place.

    1. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You are stereotyping : 1. programmers, 2. African-Americans 3. Women.

      You seem like you have good intentions. Why don't you hush and read the comments posted by others.

  7. Here we go. by UseCase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As I read some of the post here "N#$%^ are stupid" etc.... I can't help but to think that the real reason is that the development industry in general is skeptical of a person of color's capability to design and develop software. I currently work as a senior software engineer on a few key development project in the telecom industry and to tell you the truth it has been a battle to get where I am. No matter what I want to believe about merit and talent, there is an underlying "how did you get in, here?!" sentiment floating around the development industry when it comes to blacks doing design and engineering work. It is a real shame that we as an industry can't just be above all of this a hire people based on there capability. Sad world......

    1. Re:Here we go. by Swift+Kick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason you find skepticism in any industry for the capabilities of a colored person is because of the bang-up job the so-called 'civil rights leaders' have done yelling and screaming about how minorities cannot achieve anything without assistance.
      It is exactly what affirmative action has turned into; rather than give those a real opportunity to those who work hard for it, it became just another way to 'milk the system', so instead of having those most capable, you end up favoring those who are the loudest (regardless of color).

      You may refer to this as the 'soft bigotry of lowered expectations'. You might think that it's yet another racist thing, but can it be really racist when those directly responsible for it are your from your own race?

      As long as you have 'reverse discrimination' (which is what affirmative action effectively is), you cannot and should not complain that you're not evaluated on your own merits. Don't blame the industry; blame the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons.

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  8. here we go again by EllynGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Racism, just like sexism, is so deeply ingrained in most people they're totally blind to it, and even worse, are just like the first commenters to this article- self-centered clueless twits who would rather die than listen to a different point of view, especially from someone pointing out a problem or trying to correct a wrong. (I have to wonder why y'all take it so personally, and always twitch like a gaffed fish when these subjects come up? Guilty conscience?) Nobody is asking for racial quotas, though there is always at least one guaranteed slashtwit to bring it up. Most of us would settle for you fine members of the "there is no problem, just quit whining" club to shut up and keep out of our way, instead of filling the heavens with your complaining over the audacity of anyone who has been mistreated to actually stand up for him or herself, and try to make some changes.

    --

    we will end no whine before its time

    1. Re:here we go again by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of us would settle for you fine members of the "there is no problem, just quit whining" club to shut up and keep out of our way, instead of filling the heavens with your complaining

      Have you listened to yourself lately? We need a -1:Hypocrisy modifier.

      You could make the same point with less words....
      A: Shut up!
      B: How dare you tell me to shut up. You shut up!
      A: No you shut up!
      B: No you!!!
      A and B: SHUT UP!!!!

      How about we let EVERYONE have their say. Depending on the intent, the point of view that this is a waste of time may be just as valid as the point of view that something ought to be done about it. Quit telling people to shut up and state your case effectively to convince the maximum number of people that there is actually an issue. Sure would beat childish rants, even if they are modded up.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:here we go again by EllynGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ""What the hell is wrong with a community that instantly rejects any suggestion of racism?"

      NOTHING. Nothing is wrong with them, because a) we're all tired of hearing it, b) the situation is changing, gradually, but it is changing, c) the problem is often somewhere else, like equal quality of education, d) many of us "young adults" live in multi-cultural and multi-ethnic societies, and in the tech industry work with people of many races, and it is the older generation who insist on repeatedly highlighting what they see as racism, thus further fueling the segmentation of groups of people based on race and creating barriers.""

      Wow, so much wrong, so little time...I'm soooo sorry you're tired of hearing about it. You know why you're hearing about it? Because it is still a problem. The people affected by racism don't have the luxury of going "oh, I'm so sick of this! So I won't pay attention to it any more!" I love your claim that bringing attention to a problem exacerbates it. Good logical geek thinking there!

      Yes, it is very slowly changing. Very very slowly. Change comes because people work for it and don't shush because the tender sensibilities of people like you can't handle it. Why did you even read the article, since it's not a subject you want to hear about? Or waste your time commenting? It makes you uncomfortable. But you'd rather blame people than ignore it or say "yeah, it's a problem." Nobody expects YOU to try to change things for the better- the least you can do is shut your ignorant mouth and keep out of the way.

      You did not RTFA nor do you have an open mind, because if you had you would have seen there was no rhetoric of any kind. Just thoughtful expressions of personal experiences. And here you are, and a hundred other idiotic slashdotters, claiming those personal experiences are all wrong, and you are right. That's some world-class arrogance, don't you think? Why is it so hard for you accept that people are treated poorly for extremely stupid reasons like skin color? Why does it bother you so much that you tie yourself in knots denying it? It is not a solved problem.

      --

      we will end no whine before its time

  9. Stop with this racial coddling by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't want to read one more article about how african american people are under represented in this, that, or the other. It makes me angry even to see such headlines because yes racism exists but we only fuel racism by carving out sectors of society by race and speaking to how disadvantaged they are. Why are we not discussing how there are too few Indian characters in modern-day computer games, or Phillipino's, or any other race? Because blacks are a racial crux that we like to fall back on and discuss whenever matters of race and equality come into play.

    I personally work with people of all races from all over the world, and though I can't say I have absolutely no prejudices whatsoever I certainly do not consciously discriminate against anyone because of their ethnicity. And I think a very large percentage of the current/next generation are the same - we're growing up in multi-cultural environments with mixed ethnicity and we're learning to value our differences rather than look on them negatively. It is the older generation who still wants to talk about the past, who still wants to talk about stereotyping and martyrdom. TFA does nothing to break from the conventional mold, and it's infuriating to me.

    In college [Computer Science] courses, I was typically one of maybe four black students, and I was certainly the only black female. In the industry, the makeup is pretty much the same. It's intimidating at times. I'm one of a handful, but I don't let these things hold me back. It's intimidating at times? Is it really? Were you singled out at college, or because you were too aware psychologically of your ethnicity did you single yourself out and limit your interactions between the other black students? Today, do your coworkers look at you funny when you walk down the hallway? Does the conversation stop at the water cooler when you arrive? Do you have to use a specially designated bathroom? No. Why is it intimidating? It's intimidating because you are all too aware of your race and concern yourself with the possibility of prejudice, not because it necessarily exists.

    On counting the number of black women at GDC: "The grand total was six, including myself, and I hear that [the Game Developers Conference] had an attendance of over 18,000 this year." And how many white women were there? I hazard a guess at not too many, based on the industries history of mainly male developers. Yes, women are still under-represented in certain industries, too. But if they work as hard as men and are equally qualified over time the situation finds a more natural balance.

    I think a lot of folks are just now starting to see it as a career choice. Young people are starting to realize that game development is something you can make a real living at. It's not like running off to join the circus. There are curriculums that are centered specifically around it, and the industry is looking for talent above all else. A-ha! Some intelligence. There may not be a lot of african american developers because we're only now promoting it to those teens as a viable career choice!

    I could go on. If we want to end racial bias and under representation, I support the free market model: Provide people equal opportunities not by artificially advantaging one group above another or by continually highlighting racial under-representation, but through a good education across all people, and simply let things work themselves out over time. The problem will obviously not go away tomorrow, but does that really mean we have to keep highlighting it today, over and over, repeating the same old talking points?
    1. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Roxton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your proposed solution does not demonstrate a complete understanding of the problem.

      I'm white, and was raised in a good middle-class home. My use of language, my body language, my preferred attire, my attitudes, my ethics, and my social expectations are all in line with what professional white employers are looking for, because I was raised in a similar environment to them. There's a generational difference, but it's one that any competent employer is expecting.

      People underestimate how much implicit learning goes into making someone behave the way they do. You can't just change use of language, etcetera overnight. And why should you? It's elitist and wrong to assume that someone should abandon their culture in favor of the culture that is in power.

      Now, black is not a culture, but blacks in America happen to be composed of dramatically different cultural constituents than white, so it's a useful if imperfect marker for cultural differences.

      The unintended subtext of your suggestion is that the weaker cultures will eventually be abandoned in favor of the larger, more profitable cultural hegemony.That solution may work, but I don't think it's a good one. We need to change the attitudes of the employing class towards people who are different, and we need to make it possible for different people to become a major part of the employing class.

      That's not the whole picture of course - not by a long shot - but I think it raises an important point that you've either disregarded or implicitly handled inappropriately. You have to keep driving home that a problem exists before attitudes will change.

    2. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Stellian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      racism exists but we only fuel racism by carving out sectors of society by race and speaking to how disadvantaged they are. No amount of wishful thinking and pretends will make race inequality go away by itself. If there is a strong correlation between race and academic success - when common sense dictates that there should be no such correlation - we need to know why the hell it's that way: talking about it is a first step into fixing it.
      You position is basically like saying, disabled people in our town choose not to use the subway - the fact that there's no wheelchair access in the station has nothing to do with it.
      If there's no disabled person to be seen in the subway, and no black in a cube farm, we need to ask ourselves some questions - and simply asking the questions is not fueling discrimination, but helping us understand the problem, if there is one.
  10. What a crock of **** by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "programmers typically seem to be socially-stunted and have personality and mental issues"

    Who modded this crap insighful? Where did you get that , Cliched Quotes R Us? I know plenty of coders who are perfectly normal people , in fact I don't think I've ever met one who was the alleged stereotype aspergers and I only ever met one who I'd have called socially stunted.

    "In comparison, most black people and women I've come across, tend to be more outgoing and sociable."

    Women tend to be more outgoing than men. Black people ? It varies just as much as whites or asians. Are you just making this up as you go along? sounds to me like you've never mixed with anyone and are just going by the lyrics on your Craig David albums,

    "because there are a lot more interesting things to do in this world if you don't mind interacting with regular people."

    Yeah , like not posting trite made up crap you pulled out of your arse on slashdot.

  11. Not a suprising result by prefec2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the US black people are over represented in the lower class. This means, the percentage of black people belonging to the lower class in relation to all black people in the US is high than compared to the whole US society. In the lower class it is more common that young especially young male humans have an interest in gaming. This does not mean that in other classes young male do not game. It just says that the possibility that you like gaming and additionally do it quite often, increases when you are in a lower class. In Europe you get similar results. In Germany for example you can make the same analysis and you will get as a result: Turkish people are unrepresented in the gaming industry. But over represented in the gamers league. The cause is quite similar. If you are poor you get worse education. This is a institutional problem. Means schools treat you different when you are poor then when you are rich. So you get bad grades, which isn't helpful in getting to university or college. At least their is a way out of it. The Scandinavian found it. They help every kid. And they help the parents. But they are not on the "competition trip" like the USA, UK or Germany.

  12. The take on GTA by IorDMUX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So "GTA III," -- a Mafioso stereotype with a huge amount of cinema fiction to support that. It's sort of a cultural joke. We all know that Italians aren't like that but we know Mafioso gangsters are. Do we remove race from it? No, they're just gangsters. "Vice City" is just '80s "Miami Vice." So even with the Cubanos and Latinos we know all Cubanos aren't like that. "San Andreas" gets scary because it's basically what people think black people are.
    So... he's saying that blatant stereotypes are okay, as long as they are not of black people? Am I missing something?

    I've seen all three games. I'm Italian. My wife is Latina. And I'm not offended by any of it. But this interviewer seems to be saying that my lack of offense is because there is some fundamental difference in the race portrayals... I thought it was that I can choose to be offended or to be entertained by any of these blatant, joking, stereotypes.

    I don't get it.
    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
  13. Rationalized view on things by G3NE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Copied this insightful comment from the article link. I took the liberty to post it here for some additional views (I apologize in advance for any copies I posted by accident as "Anonymous Coward").

    Author: Areala

    Any time you bring race or gender bias into any particular medium, there's going to be problems. And while I can certainly see that there is a disparity, the first thing one has to look at is that numbers don't tell you everything.

    Being female, when I was growing up, I heard all the time about how women were paid less than men, and how terrible this was. And while the numbers are true, they don't tell the whole story. Women, by and large, simply tend to go after jobs that traditionally pay less. Female teachers outnumber male teachers in every school in the US, for example--this is not because men are being "held back" from teaching by an elite group of high-powered females in schools and universities, it's because there are more women interested in the job than men, and fewer males are getting their degrees and licenses than females are. Numbers alone are meaningless without a reason to go along with them.

    On the subject of ethnicity, the only counterpoints I can offer to the subject of "bias" against any particular ethnicity are as follows. First, the majority of gamers are male, and the majority of game developers are male; this isn't surprising considering that males (especially in the teenage demographic) are statistically more interested in gaming than females. We're not the rare birds we once were, but we're still not as common. Boys use video games as bonding experiences and social experiences. By and large, girls tend to bond and socialize in other ways. Men are more apt to enter the field of game design because, statistically speaking, they are more apt to be interested in it than their female counterparts are (remember the teacher analogy). It's not that the top-tier of every gaming company is conspiring to keep women out, it's that they're having a hard time finding any who are at all interested in the field period. Black or white, asian or european, it's going to be guys right now who are filling the ranks. And gaming isn't the garage-based hobby it was twenty years ago--with budgets of games in the next generation hovering in the double-digits of millions of dollars for a major, AAA title like Final Fantasy, Grand Theft Auto, or Gears of War, and gaming revenue surpassing Hollywood in terms of dollars generated, gaming companies are only interested in hiring the best people for the right positions. If you can't program, or you aren't as good a designer as somebody else, or you lack the experience a company is looking for, it doesn't matter what colour your skin is or whether you have two X chromosomes: the job will not be yours. Plain and simple.

    Point two is something that an awful lot of people seem to forget about gaming when this topic comes up for discussion, and that is that video games are all about fantasy. There's a reason why Microsoft has not made a multi-platinum-selling video game about a geeky programmer who works a 9-5 job programming the next iteration of Windows; it's a fantasy that appeals to so few people that those who would be interested in playing the game are already doing it in real life.

    Fantasy in games is all about getting to do things that you can't do in real life, either because of physical, social, ethical or legal ramifications or because the universe we inhabit is not the same as the universe of a video game. No matter how hard we might want it, none of us will be able to be Joan of Arc leading an attack on the English in an effort to restore France's deposed dauphin to his rightful place on the throne. Unless we play a video game.

    Since gaming is all about fantasy, it stands to reason that the things we want to fantasize about most are the things we will never, ever get to do in real life. There's a reason Madden NFL sells millions of copies with each year's release: there are millions of people all over the world

  14. Re:who cares by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And being a "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into computers. Give it up. You can't change the definition of a word yourself. The overwhelming majority of English speakers have already decided the definition; and that definition most definitely has something to do with race. :)

  15. Hint: you're CANADIAN. by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Believe it or not, race DOES play a different factor in a society with a huge black minority that's been systematically oppressed for most of the past 3 centuries.

    I'm guessing the black people you grew up with, poor and otherwise, didn't grow up in an entirely-black-and-Latino ghetto, weren't marked by heavy urban accents, and probably didn't even have to grow up in an area with utterly failed justice and education systems.

    If you honestly think that your initial economic situation doesn't have any impact on educational level and success in life, you're a moron.

    1. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Believe it or not, race DOES play a different factor in a society with a huge black minority that's been systematically oppressed for most of the past 3 centuries.

      So you believe placing further stigma on a person's race relative to their career is going to help, or hurt this cause?

      I'm guessing the black people you grew up with, poor and otherwise, didn't grow up in an entirely-black-and-Latino ghetto, weren't marked by heavy urban accents, and probably didn't even have to grow up in an area with utterly failed justice and education systems.

      I'm not going to get into a pissing match over who has the worst schools because that could go on all day. Justice systems? Ditto. As for urban accents? Yes, I've seen people cling to ghetto slang to the point where they steadfastly refuse to speak anything approaching proper English. I've seen these people fail miserably. I've also seen many people from "urban ghettos" emerge with a fair to excellent command of the English language succeed in life.

      So how is it exactly that oppression is holding these people back? Are there really droves of white men going around forcing these people to call every one of their peers "bro" or "niggah" or "homie" and thereby preventing them from entering the workforce in a meaningful way?

      If you honestly think that your initial economic situation doesn't have any impact on educational level and success in life, you're a moron.

      The implied ad hominem aside; didn't you read the part where I said I completed high school in a lower class area? Socio-economic progress to these people was installing a CD player in their $200 car, if they could afford a $200 car in some cases.

      Yes, I watched groups of people who preferred to smoke drugs, skip classes or become sports obsessed jocks and also groups of people who worked hard and avoided all that nonsense. Guess which group broke free from their poor socio-economic upbringing and guess which ones now serve hamburgers (or reside in jail)? Hint: Many of the aforementioned have served me various foods and beverages since commencement. I'm sure that means I'm oppressing them, right?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but it probably means you're a self-serving, materialistic asshole that has no problem stepping over people to make money.

      Actually I've been slowed in my own career advancement because I take the time to impart my gained knowledge and wisdom on new employees rather than furthering myself, but that's really immaterial to your ad hominem approach so we'll move right along.

      Nothing personal, just my observation. Those who succeed aren't smarter, nor do they work *harder*.

      So success is nothing more than exploitation? Has nothing to do with knowledge or ability to work smart or hard? Interesting.

      It's always convenient to blame poverty on behavior. The problem is I hear you saying - "If you just sell out your soul, your ethnicity, your language, your culture, and everything that makes you an individual person, you too can succeed!"

      Did I say people had to sell out their soul or their ethnicity or language? Funny, but I don't recall making that claim. However there are certain things that make people "an individual person" that are simply barriers to success in the work force. Lack of personal hygiene can be a pretty big barrier. A person's chosen vernacular and the frequent use of profanity is a distinct barrier to entry in most business and retail sectors. Is that really a problem? Seriously? You mean I should be able to approach a client and ask them "Yo mo'fucker, what's up wit' choo today niggah?" Really? Amazing. I had no idea how deeply I was involved in this systematic persecution.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  16. White/Black/Whatever by lorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me or are all these "problems" only problems in areas where "white" is the dominant (or substitute "white" for "male" and compare it to female)? Just let everyone do whatever it is they do that they are good at and enjoy. Nothing gets better cause you use somekinda quota to get more people in from different groups just for the sake of diversity.

  17. White Guilt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    WHITE GUILT!! Don't buy in to it! We owe blacks nothing anymore, they leech off of hardworking people... 1 in 9 black youths is in jail, blacks are a MINORITY yet a MAJORITY of welfare recipients, they have scholarships *just for them*, and it's easier for them to get into college thanks to affirmative action... BUT WHITES SHOULD STILL FEEL GUILTY ABOUT ISSUES SUCH AS THIS !?

  18. Simple Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you don't have/want a job, you're gonna play a lot of video games. This sounds racist, but it isn't, there are a lack of job opportunities in low income areas with a heavy black population. Sell some drugs, steal from your neighbors, and you'll have enough money to buy a console and some games. But, why then would you not go to work in the video game industry? Why bother? It's too much work, too much school, and you'll have to move away from all of your best friends. It's all really a lot harder than it sounds, most people from low income areas don't want to pack up everything and set out on a dream, which is essentially what entering the video game industry is. It's a pretty silly argument, talking about lack of opportunities in the video game industry, it all stems back to lack of opportunities in elementary schools in low income ares.

    All of that being said, I would love to hear a story about a group of black men and women who had brilliant game ideas and started their OWN game development studio in a basement and went on to make millions. It will happen eventually, with these numbers of blacks playing games it statistically must happen, it's only a matter of time. I'm kind of excited now.

  19. so?? by mattkime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the vast majority of rappers are black, but the majority of rap fans are white.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  20. African American? by nurb432 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Either you are an American or you aren't. If you aren't, then go back where you came from.

    No 'qualifiers' allowed.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  21. Re:Yes please by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So a lot of the people who it actually occurred to are probably dead?

    You're joking, right? You think your grandparents' economic and educational opportunities have no effect on where you are now? Poverty is usually multigenerational.

  22. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Depends on who you're talking to. What gets lost in these discussions is that many of the white (and other ethnicity) people that you see today were not slave owners but rather descendants of immigrants, people who came here with little or nothing. And certainly relatively recently. Many people you see today are only 3rd generation americans, if that, and those immigrant ancestors certainly did not come to a land of sunshine and lolipops. They came to a land of uncertainty, hatred, discrimination, poverty and hard work. But these people managed to rise in just 3 generations and quite successfully. Now of course YMMV and things do not always translate from one group to another perfectly. But one would expect to see a rise at least equivalent to that of most second generation americans.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  23. In Other News... by r0bVious · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Interestingly, 99% of people who purchase gasoline received from Big Oil aren't as rich as the people who "provided" it. Aren't statistics fun!

  24. Re:stupid by Arccot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And? If we truly want to live in a society of racial equality, we need to stop calling attention to stuff like this. Ignoring possible inequality does not lead to equality. Pointing out places where racism may be occurring allows us to look and see if that's the case, or if there is another underlying reason for the result. From there, we, as a society, can decide what to do, if anything, about it.