Slashdot Mirror


Bird Navigation Based On Quantum Zeno Effect

KentuckyFC writes "How birds use the Earth's magnetic field to navigate has puzzled researchers for decades. In recent years, a growing body of evidence has pointed to the possibility that a weak magnetic field can influence the outcome of a certain type of chemical reaction involving the recombination of pairs of ions in bird retinas. The trouble is that the ion recombination is known to happen too quickly for the Earth's weak magnetic field to have any effect. Now it looks as if the quantum Zeno effect explains all, says one researcher (abstract). This is the watched-pot-never-boils effect in which the act of observing a quantum system maintains it for longer than expected. That's extraordinary news because it means a quantum sensor is determining the macroscopic behavior of living birds."

96 comments

  1. Weird by MBCook · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, from reading the article, the birds observing the chemical reaction, thus slowing it down long enough for the magnetic field of the Earth to have a detectable effect when it shouldn't.

    Quantum mechanics is so weird. Neat!

    But when the researchers looked for this, shouldn't that looking have caused the metaphorical pot to be watched thus inducing the effect, or had no one tried to measure this simply because they knew the reaction didn't take long enough (or shouldn't, ignoring quantum mechanics)?

    Bonus questions: The article said that had proved this by using a strong electric field to alter the way this reaction goes. Would it be possible to inject something into the birds that would prevent them from "watching" this reaction, so it would go at it's "normal" speed?

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Weird by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually this reminds me of those Old machines that old astronomers used to try to explain how the heavens worked. Before we knew that we weren't the center of the universe... before the understanding of retrograde motion, they just kept adding gears to these things to make it work closer and closer to what they saw. They thought the answer to everything was "It must be more complex than what we understand". If I have learned anything in my life worth knowing is that the universe than we want to give it credit for.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Weird by aleph42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But when the researchers looked for this, shouldn't that looking have caused the metaphorical pot to be watched thus inducing the effect, or had no one tried to measure this simply because they knew the reaction didn't take long enough (or shouldn't, ignoring quantum mechanics)?

      I didn't have any serious courses on quantum-anything, but I think you are taking this way to
      "philosophically". "Observation" here actually just means interaction with a nearby atom.

      I think that the idea is that the atom is in an "undefined" state (or rather, multiple states at once), and that having an interaction (which should depend on the state) forces it to chose between states. Once this happens (in the bird's retina), I don't think any further interaction can affect anything, and certainly not something as indirect as a human looking at the bird.
      Confusion arise because of the words "observation", "retina" and looking" in the same topic.

      That said, I had the impression that those kind of quantum weirdness (like the living-dead cat) were a good hint that those thing can never scale up to act uppon the "regular" world, were everything is a result of statistics (like air pressure which is the statistical sum of random movement). A good exemple is how intricated atoms could theorically convert information at faster than light speed, but if you actually want to use it then the observation equipement needed will keep you under light speed (and it's not something you can get around). So if this turns out to be true, I will be quite amased.

      Bonus questions: The article said that had proved this by using a strong electric field to alter the way this reaction goes. Would it be possible to inject something into the birds that would prevent them from "watching" this reaction, so it would go at it's "normal" speed?

      Good idea! Let's stick the large electromagnet in the bird's retina, then watch to see if it's flying paterns are different! ;)
      --
      Don't take my posts literally; it's just code to control my botnet.
    3. Re:Weird by nacturation · · Score: 1

      If I have learned anything in my life worth knowing is that the universe than we want to give it credit for. Something missing there... "is simpler" you mean?
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Weird by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Funny
      If I have learned anything in my life worth knowing is that the universe than we want to give it credit for.

      The one thing you've learned in your life, and it makes no sense. That must be depressing. Or maybe it's deeply philosophical.

    5. Re:Weird by PoliTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If you understand, things are just as they are; if you do not understand, things are just as they are." Zen saying

    6. Re:Weird by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Aleph42 covered the basics. Read the linked (in the summary) article on Wikipedia about the quantum Zeno effect.

      "Observation" means interaction. If you take one of these molecules and bombard it with photos, atoms, whatever, it will take longer to switch states. The article seems to imply that it's interaction with the magnetic field itself that is slowing down the reaction.

    7. Re:Weird by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      I have a theory based on this there was no actual process to anything until we startes looking for the process. Reading things like this article seem to confirm my thoughts.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    8. Re:Weird by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      You are correct. I have no idea where those words went :(((((((((

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    9. Re:Weird by laxpeter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure there's a simple explanation.

    10. Re:Weird by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0
      > "Observation" here actually just means interaction with a nearby atom.

      That's not enough to qualify as an observation in this context. What you need is some kind of coupling to the environment. That could be a chain reaction starting with an interaction with a nearby atom and ending up with a macroscopic change. But a nearby atom not coupled to anything else wouldn't do.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    11. Re:Weird by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's that cat again! He took them.

    12. Re:Weird by tenco · · Score: 1
      Statistics in classical mechanics and in quantuum mechanics is not the same. If you have a system of particles, classical you assume that, in principle, you could measure every particles location and speed at a given time which determines the complete state of your system in the future (and which you could compute then, accuracy only limited by the accuracy of your measurement and computing equipment). So, classical, you assume that you have to use statistics because you don't have the right equipment to carry this measurement/computing out and that the variables location and speed of all your system's particles are hidden variables that are there, but aren't accounted for by your theory.

      Which isn't the case in quantuum mechanics. Assuming that there are local hidden variables in quantuum theory leads to the so called Bell's inequalities which should be fullfilled by any theory with local hidden variables. Yet there is experimental evidence that there are quantuum systems which do not fullfill these inequalities. You may also look into the more sophisticated GHZ experiment.

  2. I have a question... by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this a first? Are there any other known instances of quantum mechanics influencing the macroscopic behavior of anything else? Butterflies, for example? And what happens when the poles shift?

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    1. Re:I have a question... by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A damned good question. Could changing magnetic fields of the Earth and the Sun be the cause of the bee syndrome that is killing some 30% of all commercial bees in North America?

      Bees, like birds, just don't seem to get lost very often... until now. There seems to be no practical explanation of why the bees are disappearing. This might do it. Given that bees are smaller, perhaps the effects are greater on bees? Did the article give any clue as to how the volume of chemical might affect the interactions?

      Quite interesting. Given the story of evolution, and knowing that many animals use electromagnetic and quantum type navigation, how likely is it that humans have some similar capabilities?

      Not to get too whacked, but does any of this go anywhere toward explaining ghosts etc?

      All good stuff

    2. Re:I have a question... by peragrin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually the bee problem is mostly identified with pollution. Air born pollution is limiting the range that pollen and other floral scents travel in the air thus limiting the mobility of bees.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:I have a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually the bee problem is mostly identified with a virus.

      "finding IAPV in a bee sample correctly distinguished CCD from non-CCD status 96.1 percent of the time."

      http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070906140803.htm

    4. Re:I have a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to get too whacked, but does any of this go anywhere toward explaining ghosts etc?

      I think your whackometer needs recalibrating.
      That ghosts idea definitely should have outputted "too whacked".

    5. Re:I have a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ...well they are thinking that plants use a type of Quantum gate for Photosynthesis:
      http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/PBD-quantum-secrets.html ...

      It that counts as quantum mechanics influencing macroscopic behavior.

    6. Re:I have a question... by johannesg · · Score: 4, Funny

      The lifecycle of cats is also determined by quantum mechanics.

    7. Re:I have a question... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If this occurs in the retina a pole shift might not have any major effect on bird behavior. Eyes process what the landscape looks like, the possession of the sun, landmarks, and so on. Because the ability to sense 'north' occurs in the eyes, logically, the bird would take into account all information it's eyes gathered. This would provide redundancy and increased accuracy, along with making a pole shift an issue of recalibration, and not relearning entire thought processes.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    8. Re:I have a question... by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... So says a 4 day old slashdot article. Next week we're going to have an article on how the sinking of the titanic influenced thermal currents in the atlantic, reducing El Nino's effect in the pacific, thus causing plants to flower before bees have come completely out of hibernation, leading to starvation.
       
      Clearly, since this is the most recent theory, all previous theories are deeply flawed.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:I have a question... by tuxgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe we're over anal-izing the question. From my own observations as sort of an amateur hobbyist zoologist/ornithologist, birds have brains and memory retention, ie, they posses the ability to learn. Perhaps it's just a matter of older birds remember the way to go and the rest follow and learn the landmarks, to someday become the leader of the migration as well.

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    10. Re:I have a question... by fitten · · Score: 1

      It's Global Warming, er... Extreme Environmental Change (or whatever it is being called now)... everything else seems to be blamed on it, I don't see why this can't be blamed on it as well.

    11. Re:I have a question... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Quantum mechanics influences the behavior of people carrying geiger counters.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    12. Re:I have a question... by Hadlock · · Score: 0

      Well you know that global warming is caused by spent nuclear power waste seeping into the ground water, don't you? All aspects of modern living are eeeeeevil and will haunt us to the end of our days.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    13. Re:I have a question... by clubby · · Score: 1

      anal-izing

      I hope -- oh, God, how I hope -- you mean "analyzing." If I'm wrong, please do not correct me. I don't want to know. :P

    14. Re:I have a question... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apparently the effect is sensitive to only a narrow window of magnetic field strengths, so if something significantly affects the field then the birds get lost. We've had birds through several reversals which argues that birds won't go extinct when it happens again.

    15. Re:I have a question... by RealErmine · · Score: 1

      Clearly, since this is the most recent theory, all previous theories are deeply flawed.
      Please provide an address where I can send the grant money. Thanks!
      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    16. Re:I have a question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for last year when they briefly identified a fungus growing on the bees that did it. For a week. Then it was all about the politcally-motivated stuff.

      Scientists can (and do) lie for profit. Just because they present findings doesn't mean they didn't skew it toward an agenda.

    17. Re:I have a question... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Not to get too whacked, but does any of this go anywhere toward explaining ghosts etc? Sorry, I think you just got a little too whacked.
      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    18. Re:I have a question... by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      I hope -- oh, God, how I hope -- you mean "analyzing." If I'm wrong, please do not correct me. I don't want to know. :P
      Not too many catch the dry humor there. Glad you did. d:-/

      anal-ize - slang for reference to an anal retentive person, like my ex-wife ...

      I put the hyphen in there for clarity ...

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    19. Re:I have a question... by BungaDunga · · Score: 1

      Slashdot had a story about how plants seem to be using quantum physics in photosynthesis- specifically, the electron transport chain is so efficient because of quantum effects. Pretty cool, and if true all oxygen-requiring life on the planet is down to quantum mechanics.

    20. Re:I have a question... by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 2

      The wording "mostly identified with" hardly implies that all previous explanations are "deeply flawed".

      Clearly, since the article in question is only 4 days old your parent poster can't have formed a well reasoned opinion on the matter.

    21. Re:I have a question... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on adding absolutely nothing to the conversation! Including all of your previously searchable posts. Jesus. Go kill yourself now.
       
      Idea: Instead of telling people why they're wrong and leaving it at that, continue on with what you think should be done instead, and what brought you to that conclusion. You'll note you have zero replies to the comments you made - that's because they're not worth reading. Rather than being a jackass to everyone, you might consider constructive critisism. Registering an account on slashdot and then just thread-shitting does nobody any good except to stroke your "i'm awesome and you're completely WRONG-cock". This is the second of this type of reply I've gotten to a highly rated comment in the last month - what is it with you people?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  3. No need for a quantum sensor... by GrosTuba · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dude, we know how birds navigate: they follow roads.

    --
    Who needs a .sig anyway ?
    1. Re:No need for a quantum sensor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it that they follow roads, or use the thermals created by pavement to take some of the work out of flying?

    2. Re:No need for a quantum sensor... by MBCook · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting article, I hadn't seen that.

      Of course, the article says that's what they do when they know the area. They just use the landscape to guide them. When unfamiliar with an area, it says they use the sun, starts, and magnetic field of the Earth to find out which way to go.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:No need for a quantum sensor... by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What color are most roads? What do dark colors do in sunlight? What happens when air heats up? What's the easiest way for a bird to stay aloft?

      Lets all say it together...correllation != causality.

    4. Re:No need for a quantum sensor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. It's good thing that when God created the Earth 6000 years ago that he made sure that there were roads for migratory birds to follow!

    5. Re:No need for a quantum sensor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Periwinkle. Fade, unless you wash with Tide. God kills a kitten. By weighing the same as a duck (or wood, or a witch).

    6. Re:No need for a quantum sensor... by CODiNE · · Score: 1
      From your article :

      "For long-distance navigation and for birds doing a journey for the first time, they will use their inbuilt compasses and take sun and star bearings.

      advertisement

      "But once homing pigeons have flown a journey more than once, they home in on a habitual route home, much as we do when we are driving or walking home from work.

      "In short, it looks like it is mentally easier for a bird to fly down a road and then turn right. They are just making their journey as simple as possible".


      Good way to misrepresent the article. I wonder what that sort of argumentative fallacy is called.

      When the source states A + B, but you cite it as A only. Very nice, I'll keep an eye out for future use of this technique. Not that you did it on purpose, perhaps you only read the title which is also misleading.
      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    7. Re:No need for a quantum sensor... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, roads. You'd be surprised what happens to traffic patterns when you fly your hang glider along the highway.

    8. Re:No need for a quantum sensor... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thus explaining why birds weren't practical until the early 1900s.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  4. This is obviously why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. it is placed on the birds' eyes, and not on their ass. Because that would make it a pain to see all the time.

  5. Cool! by thecountryofmike · · Score: 3, Funny

    Schrodinger's Pigeon?!?!

    1. Re:Cool! by Tangent128 · · Score: 1

      I hope Schrodinger has an indoor cat...

    2. Re:Cool! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      But is it a Ceiling Cat or a Floor Cat? Or a quantum superposition of Ceiling AND Floor cats?

    3. Re:Cool! by Tangent128 · · Score: 1

      a quantum superposition of Ceiling AND Floor cats?
      You mean a hovercat?
    4. Re:Cool! by VShael · · Score: 1

      Schrodinger's Pigeon?!?!
      Aw man! I think it pooped on my car. I'm not sure though.

  6. Frickin' birds by Rastignac · · Score: 1

    What ? Frickin' birds with frickin' quantum zeno effects attached to their heads ??
    Only seen on Slashdot...

    --
    -- Rastignac was here.
  7. Shock news just in.... by Anoraknid+the+Sartor · · Score: 1

    Birds killed by non-dead, non-live cat...

    --
    Find Japanese addresses in English on Google Maps Japan: http://diddlefinger.com/
  8. call ben stein by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Funny
    And cue the ID folks claiming irreducible complexity in

    3...

    2...

    1...

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    1. Re:call ben stein by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      No, they'll deny this. It "proves" that animals have souls.

  9. I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are a gazillion better explanations.

    why recourse to a QM effect?

    1. Re:I call BS by Sylos · · Score: 1

      because "quantum zeno effect" sounds so much cooler than "birds use roadmaps to fly south"

      --
      'Number-memorizing Chinese people.'-Anon
  10. New class of electronic devices. by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow. I want to see the full paper.

    If this is for real, there's a whole new class of electronic devices waiting to be developed. The Zeno effect has been observed experimentally, but only down near absolute zero. If it can be observed at room temperature, it could be useful.

    1. Re:New class of electronic devices. by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      RAIB? (Redundant Array of Independent Birds?) A quad-core 3ghz pigeon?

      My electric bill will be down to nothing, but the birdseed bill will be killing me.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    2. Re:New class of electronic devices. by sp332 · · Score: 1
    3. Re:New class of electronic devices. by Rakarra · · Score: 1


      If this is for real, there's a whole new class of electronic devices waiting to be developed.
      The Zeno effect has been observed experimentally, but only down near absolute zero. If it can be observed at room temperature, it could be useful.

      No, no, clearly this proves that birds brains actually function normally close to absolute zero. The trick is to figure out how they're doing it.
    4. Re:New class of electronic devices. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You could say that you are constantly observing the Zeno effect. The constant interaction of pretty much every macroscopic object suppresses quantum weirdness. The cat can't be both dead and alive because it is constantly being "observed" by bouncing air molecules, photons and whatnot off it.

    5. Re:New class of electronic devices. by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Paper. You'll need to wear suitable shades to protect you from the awfulness of the font in which it is written.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    6. Re:New class of electronic devices. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If this is for real, there's a whole new class of electronic devices waiting to be developed.

      Oh great, iPods that drip white gunk on your windshield.

  11. quantum Zeno effect by ebolaZaireRules · · Score: 1

    My personal email suffers from this - Everytime the boss walks past

    --
    The Bible: Historically verifiable fact from an observers point of view
  12. quantum Zeno effect by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    I think Bob's beer may be somewhat tenuously relarted to this. There is the "quantum beer effect" whare if it is known that there is beer in the fridge, the beer will for some strange reason disappear. Especially if Tami or Amy are around.

    -mcgrew

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  13. Yes. Chlorophyll by oni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chlorophyll works by means of Resonance Energy Transfer and that's also a quantum effect - though admittedly, not as cool as the bird navigation thing.

    I'd be willing to bet that this didn't evolve in birds. A lot of animals perform long distance migrations. In fact, I bet that this sense is found in most animals. We apes are probably the exception. We probably lost it while swinging from trees. But the genes are probably still there. So, one day you might be able to turn this on in your children.

  14. Favorite comment from the arxiv blog entry: by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

    "Kominis is careful not to mention it but the quantum consciousness people are going to be all over this like freshmen at a sorority party."

    Interestingly enough, the Wikipedia article mentions exactly. Personally, I think the Quantum Consciousness idea is hogwash, but that's just because I don't think that that is necessary to explain consciousness. Neural networks are weird creatures, and I'm pretty sure that a good chunk of cognitive ability (including self-identification) can come from that alone.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    1. Re:Favorite comment from the arxiv blog entry: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quantum "consciousness" is a bit misguided, but I think quantum free will may be a valid stance.

      I don't think we're ever going to see a satisfactory empirical explanation for consciousness, which I take to mean our fully packaged internal narration of our brain's activities, which is much more elaborate than simple self-awareness. I have no way of describing the exact nature of my consciousness and I have no way of knowing the exact nature of other people's consciousness. And we have no way of determining what sort of systems have consciousness.

      If someone can show me an empirical model that can predict the nature of a system's consciousness from the system's physical properties I'll change my opinion on this.

    2. Re:Favorite comment from the arxiv blog entry: by argent · · Score: 1

      If someone can show me an empirical model that can predict the nature of a system's consciousness from the system's physical properties I'll change my opinion on this.

      Even if I grant your distinction between self-awareness and consciousness, I think that's rather a hard criterion to meet, since untangling a neural network's referents by observation of the network itself is a hard problem, and you kind of need to do that to pull out how far the neural network is actually modeling itself...

    3. Re:Favorite comment from the arxiv blog entry: by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you want to believe you have free will then you have no choice but to invoke quantum mechanics.

    4. Re:Favorite comment from the arxiv blog entry: by howlingfrog · · Score: 1

      Neural networks are weird creatures

      Creatures are weird neural networks, too.

      --
      The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
  15. Every chemical sensor is a "quantum sensor" by GroeFaZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    because every seonsor has to obey the rules of quantum mechanics. The only difference being which theory is sufficient to explain a certain effect.

    Even if pointing this out may be a bit boring, people should stop mystifiying Science and speak of it as cavemen would grunt of a lightning storm. There's absolutely nothing mysterious about Science, that's the whole point of Science to begin with.

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    1. Re:Every chemical sensor is a "quantum sensor" by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most sensors don't directly make use of specifically quantum effects. They can be described purely in classical terms.

      It's like saying that my car is a relativistic vehicle. Sure, it obeys the theories of relativity, but Newton is more than enough to describe it.

      Or describing my notebook as a quantum computer.

      When people (even non-physicists) talk about quantum mechanical effects, its accepted that they're talking about UNIQUELY quantum mechanical effects. If you see some sort of mysticism in that then that's your misunderstanding.

    2. Re:Every chemical sensor is a "quantum sensor" by jd · · Score: 0, Redundant
      You're totally correct there. However, you should remember that departments get funded by how often their papers get cited, so there is an incentive to make all papers fully buzzword-compliant rather than scientifically correct. In this particular case, it could be argued that the buzzword is appropriate because the effect being utilized is normally only seen at the microscopic level, not the macroscopic as here. However, precisely since the Zeno Effect is normally only seen at the microscopic level, the addition of the term "quantum" is superfluous and therefore likely used more to draw attention to the article than to say anything useful.

      Specifically on the topic of mystifying science, science classes generally don't help much in this regard. They work from older models to newer ones, which in itself isn't necessarily bad (as it teaches how to understand things from first principles and how the ideas developed historically) but because older models introduced fudge factors or were based on incorrect assumptions, those who do not progress far enough in science classes are left with erronious beliefs and superstitions. Even those who do progress to a high level are at risk, because once something is learned, it is very hard to unlearn it.

      The selection of models - and textbooks - is also important. Most textbooks are historically inaccurate (negating the value of the teaching the history of science and assisting in the mystifying and religifying of modern discoveries of historical fact) and many contain errors in the science (such as confusing the terminology, getting the right results for the wrong reasons, and so forth). The teaching of calculus is particularly bad - I've known a lot of bright people left totally confused by it due to the fact that the way it is usually taught misses a lot of mental steps in the process and fails to define terminology. That's a pity. Calculus is so simple that Archimedes could not only derive it from first principles but also discover the first principles as well in only a handful of notes. Combinatorial logic is generally taught as an advanced subject, but the foundations were discovered by cutting up triangles, making it a subject that could be taught at elementary school the same way Venn diagrams and basic set logic are. (It may be, by now, but I've a suspicion the reverse is true, that less science appears at an early age.)

      Finally, the complexity and difficulty of problems is also exaggerated. Stonehenge's 250 tonne massive Sarson stones are local, it's the bluestone granite that was imported and those are much smaller. The Great Pyramid was built after a long history of developing the technology and the difficult parts were probably poured as a form of concrete. (This makes the proposed German concrete Pyramid - a giant cemetary for tens of thousands, which is intended to be three times taller than the Great Pyramid - a direct successor in terms of materials used as well as intended purpose.) The weather isn't horrendously complex, it's merely an unstable chaotic system. The illusion of complexity comes from the fact that it can never be measured accurately enough to model perfectly. Quantum mechanics is not stuffed full of paradoxes, it's merely stuffed full of probabilities. Particle/wave duality, the existence of fields, and other convenient tricks are merely taught to avoid having to explain the mechanics behind the science. In a way, it's worse than caveman logic, because they had the excuse of not having the information available about the underlying principles. Today, no such excuse exists.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  16. I fear the distinction is lost on me by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    That's extraordinary news because it means a quantum sensor is determining the macroscopic behavior of living birds."

    I don't see the novelty. Quantum effects are what determine the behavior, the existence and everything else about the living birds, the dead mammals, the burning stars and whatever else you can imagine.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:I fear the distinction is lost on me by BungaDunga · · Score: 1

      But you can describe an awful lot of phenomena using entirely classical (ie non-quantum) physics. Behaviors that can only be explained through quantum mechanics are interesting, and we rarely see them having effects on the macroscopic world except in carefully designed experiments.

  17. Quantum Xenu Effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Birds are Scientologists now? Actually... that explains a lot...

  18. What do birds see? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm intrigued that this effect happens in avian retinas. Do birds actually *see* magnetic north and south? As in, everything to the north is tinted one color, and everything to the south is tinted another hue?

    Fascinating. Birds (and possibly dinosaurs) see the world as one gigantic rave. Sometimes I feel I'm missing too much by being born human.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:What do birds see? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Do birds actually *see* magnetic north and south? As in, everything to the north is tinted one color, and everything to the south is tinted another hue? Fascinating. Birds (and possibly dinosaurs) see the world as one gigantic rave. Sometimes I feel I'm missing too much by being born human.

      Worse yet, birds have 4 types of color cones in their eyes, and we only have 3. They can see colors we can't. Most sun-dwelling vertebrates can see more colors. The theory is that mammals lost some color ability because the original mammal was a nocturnal creature and didn't need the overhead of extra color cones. Most mammals only have 2 color cones. Primates re-evolved a 3rd one, probably to distinguish fruit quality, although it is not as good as the original because its too closely spaced in the spectrum. Evolution gave us bum eyes.
  19. HHGTTG reference, perhaps. by jd · · Score: 1

    If the question and the answer cancel out, they might take the universe with it.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  20. Too late. by jd · · Score: 1

    A swallow has already patented the technology, along with quantum lifting gear for coconuts.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Too late. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      What, do you mean an African or European swallow?

  21. Lost theories, that's what it is by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    After reading all the comments, I realized striking similarity of the style of wild assumptions of those comments to "theories" about "Lost"

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  22. i think its fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    i just think its fascinating how they stay aloft while carrying all that equipment.

  23. from the schroedinger's-parrot dept by howlingfrog · · Score: 1

    So this article simultaneously is and is not a Monty Python reference?

    --
    The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
  24. Re:Yes. Chlorophyll by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quantum effect this, quantum effect that. The fact that your head doesn't fall off is a quantum effect, without which electrons, protons and neutrons couldn't possibly form stable structures. Everything on a small enough scale is a "quantum effect". Saying that chlorophyll works by means of a quantum effect is like saying that computers rely on a one-is-bigger-than-zero effect.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  25. Quantum Zeno Effect... by u-bend · · Score: 1

    The Zeno Effect must differ from the Xemu effect in that with the latter, the more you observe the event, the more full of crap it is.

    --
    u-bend
  26. Quantum idiot effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe like most other flying creatures they are mearly seeing the polarization angle of sunlight.

    The zeno effect isn't mysterious or magical. People use "observation" to make it seem that way but "observation" really means "interfering with". Your not mearly watching a block of ice melt -- your activly pouring hot water on it and observing the obvious outcome.

    And then TFA has the audacity to bring up "quantum consiousness" ... I pass on such crankery .. no thank you.

  27. Brain? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Makes one wonder if its possible that the human brain takes advantage of some kinds of quantum-level effects. This could mean that our existing neural net model is insufficient, and that the brain is even more complex than we realized. If its possible to take advantage of such forces, then evolution likely would.

  28. Why Birds? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It seems kind of odd that birds would be the first, and perhaps only, animal this affect has been found in nature. But then one realizes that birds face strong evolutionary pressure to weigh as least as possible. Thus, whereas standard chemistry may be sufficient in a land animal, the mechanism may weigh too much for birds, resulting in evolution finding a more complex and indirect, but lighter solution. Of course, this is just speculation at this point.

  29. Going places with Zeno's help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody else appreciate the irony of Zeno helping with locomotion?

  30. Biological use of quantum effects? by damburger · · Score: 1

    I had previously been under the impression that the structures in biological cells were too large to utilise quantum effects, but this seems to contradict that.

    This might merit another look at Roger Penrose's theory that conciousness has a quantum origin, as the main objection to it previously was that there could not be quantum biological effects.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Biological use of quantum effects? by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this article...

  31. Really? by AC-x · · Score: 1

    Birds use the quantum zeno effect to navigate? Is that so? And there I was thinking it was because they had iron oxide crystals embedded in their beaks, oh how silly that all sounds now :)