Slashdot Mirror


Will the Earth's Tail Fry Moon Visitors?

Roland Piquepaille writes "Researchers working for NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission have discovered that the Earth's magnetic tail could be harmful to future astronauts. The moon stays inside Earth's 'magnetotail' for six days every month — during full moon. This can have consequences ranging from lunar 'dust storms' to strong electrostatic discharges, according to one researcher quoted by NASA in 'The Moon and the Magnetotail.' So far, this is pure speculation: no man has been on the moon when the magnetotail hits. As added the same scientist, 'Apollo astronauts never landed on a full moon and they never experienced the magnetotail.' But read more for additional details about how Earth's magnetotail could affect men on the moon."

166 comments

  1. All I know by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I know is, I don't get any tail for six days every month!

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    1. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Meh. That is what towels on the bed and a shower after is for. You're getting ripped off.

    2. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not that he'll understand, he probably doesn't get any tail for the other 24 days either.

    3. Re:All I know by that+IT+girl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, that's nasty D:

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    4. Re:All I know by ABoerma · · Score: 1

      Thereby implying you do get tail the rest of the month? You must be- ah, whatever. Lucky git.

    5. Re:All I know by phreakincool · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet its more than 6 days...just saying. :P

    6. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      who said you could leave the kitchen? Go make me a sandwich sweetie.

    7. Re:All I know by that+IT+girl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Spoken like a true anonymous coward.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    8. Re:All I know by budgenator · · Score: 4, Funny

      All I know is, I don't get any tail for six days every month! on the moon the tail gets you, 6 days a month
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    9. Re:All I know by monoqlith · · Score: 1

      And all I know is....I also don't get any tail the other 24 days.

    10. Re:All I know by eclectro · · Score: 1

      All I know is, I don't get any tail for six days every month! Dude, you get tail?!?! What moon are you from??
      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    11. Re:All I know by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Funny

      She works in IT. She dosen't make sandwiches, she makes the coffee, you insensitive clod!

    12. Re:All I know by that+IT+girl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haha! And people wonder why more women don't take an interest in computers. It's not the computers they're afraid of, it's putting up with all the comments like this... Good thing I can handle it -flex- :D

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    13. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No girls allowed! We don't want cooties!

    14. Re:All I know by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      It's called "being able to take a joke" and I assure you that the men in my company are picked on much, much more than the women are. Of course, I'm not counting all the lame pick-up lines that the ladies have to deal with, but eh :P

    15. Re:All I know by phreakincool · · Score: 1

      No. It's the computers. You can't properly accessorize a biege metal box.

    16. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was what Macs were for.

      -LT

    17. Re:All I know by jtev · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Macs are an accessory. If you want to accesorize then you go with the over priced Alienware computers.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    18. Re:All I know by that+IT+girl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, of course. In fact, I'm secure and know I'm good at my job, so generally I find these comments pretty funny. Especially knowing some of the women that I work with who I just know HAD to have gotten where they are through... unscrupulous means. Nevertheless, it's not exactly a welcoming environment for the average lady, no matter how savvy. ;)

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    19. Re:All I know by that+IT+girl · · Score: 2, Funny

      But you sure can try! When I worked for the computer department in college, I had this one professor whose situation had me stumped. I had to re-install her operating system once every week or two, and even replaced the hard drive once because of bad sectors all over the place. I had no idea what was going on; she swore she just used it for emails and her worksheets, etc. After a while, she called one day, and I finally decided I'd go take a look at it in it's usual environment instead of having her bring it up like usual. And what did I see? About 20 cute but destructive little magnets all over the side of it. x.x She'd been taking them off every time she brought me her computer, so I had no idea they were on usually on there. After I explained why this was a very bad idea and advised her not to put magnets near it, her computer never had a problem again. Fancy that!

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    20. Re:All I know by j01123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And all I know is....I also don't get any tail the other 24 days. Well, you'll get more tail living on the moon than you do living in your mom's basement.
    21. Re:All I know by Raineer · · Score: 1

      Best first post ever.

    22. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Make it yourself!

    23. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It's called "being able to take a joke" Where is the humor in

      who said you could leave the kitchen? Go make me a sandwich sweetie." or

      She works in IT. She dosen't make sandwiches, she makes the coffee, you insensitive clod! I see plenty of misogyny and fear, but no humor. Do you also crack jokes based on race or disability? Well, what's the difference?

      I assure you that the men in my company are picked on much, much more than the women are You reveal your own sexism with this weak attempt at justification. (Incidentally, this fact is much funnier than your stupid joke).

    24. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sudo make me a sandwich.

    25. Re:All I know by pxc · · Score: 1

      For less secure women than you, there's an easier solution, at least here on /.: Don't explicitly state that you're female in your username.

      You don't wanna know what you'd have to do in meatspace...

    26. Re:All I know by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Well now we know who is a card carrying member of the "he-man women haters club".

      No wonder most computer geeks don't have girlfriends and are still single and never got married. Have a nice life living in your mother's basement.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    27. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's funny to me because it's so ignorant and out of step with the times. (I've known guys who thought like this; but that's not funny, it's sad.)

      Of course if the poster really feels that way then it is misogyny! :)

      Also, I can believe the statement about men teasing each other much more than they'd tease a woman, because the threat of harrassment is more prevalent been two people of different gender. IMO.

    28. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is Chunkie Monky? Did he get any tail? ;-)

    29. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The interesting thing is that, before we replaced the job with machines, computation and computer science was dominated by women. It was one of those few "acceptable careers."

      Maybe it's just that I pay more attention to this area more than others, but it seems like IT in general is an unfriendly place to be. It's fairly elitist in almost every aspect. This is the same complaint of a lot of people moving to linux, women in the industry, and foreigners in the US. There's very much a "who let /you/ in here?" attitude.

      Then again, it seems like the people who are genuinely exclusionary are a very small minority; as it's been stated elsewhere, the status quo is very harsh amongst itself. It makes for a stressful situation for most normal people: If I say this to be friendly, will she perceive it as inappropriate? If I say this to rib her, will she take it as hostile? If I don't say anything, will she take it as exclusion? But on the other side: Was he trying to be mean or funny? Is he an awkward person is it because I'm a woman? Is he being friendly or flirty?

      We've all become so self-conscious about what is a real problem, but which has come to dominate so many professional relationships, especially towards introduction. We all need to get over it, but it's the most extreme cases (genuine bigotry or oversensitivity) that hold us all back.

    30. Re:All I know by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I find it quite amusing personally. Perhaps if you were more secure in the fact that Women can be incredible engineers and supremely intelligent people, and not just foodmakers, you'd be able to get the joke as well.

      Poking fun at stereotypes is only amusing to people who aren't racist or sexist. To those who are it tends to seem offensive. I'm perfectly willing to crack disability jokes, if the person I'm talking to knows I'm kidding and won't be offended. Same goes with racist jokes (me and my friends have an ongoing joke about the token black person who appears in many movies and games which we find funny and non-offensive but I'm sure you would think is racist).

      You reveal your own sexism by not being able to accept the fact that the stereotypical woman homemaker isn't the common case anymore, and that it's therefore open for jokes along with all other past stereotypes (for a good example of funny old stereotypes just watch any monty python skit/movie :P)

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    31. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps if you were more secure in the fact that Women can be incredible engineers and supremely intelligent people I am ultimately secure in this fact. So much so that I don't feel the need to cut them down with misogynist humor. Instead, I prefer to treat them and others the way I prefer to be treated myself: with respect.

      Poking fun at stereotypes is only amusing to people who aren't racist or sexist. Your twist, while potentially clever, completely misses the mark. You don't actually believe what you said here, do you?

      You reveal your own sexism by not being able to accept the fact that the stereotypical woman homemaker isn't the common case anymore I don't like any humor based on race, gender, or any other attribute beyond the control of the subject (including height, weight, disability, etc). By your logic, I must be the most prejudiced person ever.

      if the person I'm talking to knows I'm kidding and won't be offended

      me and my friends have an ongoing joke

      not being able to accept the fact that the stereotypical woman homemaker isn't the common case anymore These conditions do not apply to everyone and you assume too much. I wonder if you get a "positive" reaction because your audience doesn't feel the confrontation is worth it. Perhaps you are even known for this type of humor and as a result there is a certain expectation to hear it from you.
    32. Re:All I know by glittalogik · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ditto. I know a couple of friends who have semi-regular Ethnic Slur Days, which used to be fairly superficial with drunken name-calling, and have now (d)evolved to the point of researching historical events to find new things to blame each other for. When it gets to the point where, for example, you're yelling at the token Catalan in the group for Ysabella bringing the Inquisition to the Canary Islands in the late 15th Century, it starts getting downright educational.

      (fucking spaniards.)

    33. Re:All I know by that+IT+girl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Okay! :D

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    34. Re:All I know by AdamTheBastard · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anonymous Coward is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.

    35. Re:All I know by chunk08 · · Score: 1

      We know? He did post AC.

      --
      Do away with our corrupt tax code. Support the Fair Tax
    36. Re:All I know by somersault · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There was a Scotsman, an Englishman and an.. oh wait, you probably wouldn't get it anyway..

      For the record, I think the GP sounds like he has a decent sense of humour, and you're just scared of upsetting people. Personally I think there's a lot of humour to be found in stereotypes, as long as it is the ironic kind and not just vicious racism and the like. I don't mind people making jokes about my ethnicity (Scottish), the fact that I am not a morning person, blah blah blah.

      There have been people at my work who do seem genuinely bigoted and in those cases, your talk of avoiding confrontation and such is valid, but the GP doesn't sound like a bigot. And as an aside, how on earth do you think that weight is 'beyond the control' of the subject (unless they perhaps aren't physically well enough to do exercise). If you get regular exercise and don't eat junk then it's going to be pretty difficult for your body to pile on the pounds. I have a pretty good metabolism (I recognise that some people put on weight more easily than others, I'm 14 stone/196 pounds, 6'2", my sister goes crazy whenever I suggest I'm getting 'fat', because I'm not :p ), but I also am trying to keep more of a reign of my appetite these days. FFS, I hate political correctness so much..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    37. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny BECAUSE we know it's wrong. Interpreted in a certain light, it actually is a cynical remark on the status quo. Everyone always jumps down the throat of everyone else. You all need to get laid.

    38. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, take it with a grain of salt. We all have to get along. I mean, this is the internet right? Of all people, shouldn't slashdot be the place for equality and peace? I'm not sure how this all got started, but can't it stop? Peace everyone.

    39. Re:All I know by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I prefer to treat them and others the way I prefer to be treated myself: with respect."

      My friends and I have a habit of showing respect through joking. I once confused a teacher by getting in a huge joke argument with one of my best friends, which had us both laughing and the teacher wondering how we could be friends and be so mean to one another.

      "These conditions do not apply to everyone and you assume too much"

      They apply to myself and those I consider friends. Ergo we all enjoy such jokes (especially jabs at one of my friends because he's of Dutch origin and just happens to be a very frugal person. The two are entirely unrelated (there's a good reason for his frugality) but we all have fun poking fun at it, even the friend).

      If you don't like such humor then that's fine, perhaps I went a little overboard in my statements because I was in a bad mood. But don't assume that those of us who do enjoy such humor are horrible people either. We happen to enjoy poking fun at someone because of things beyond their control, because it's clearly joking. I myself am often poked fun of for my height, all in good fun because we all know and acknowledge that none of these things are going to change, could be changed, and so laughing at them isn't offensive, because the person knows it's all in good fun (and trust me, they enjoy it just as much as I do, otherwise my best friend would long ago have ditched me :P).

      And no, I'm not particurally well known for this type of humor. It's only in the company of those who I know are mature enough to not be offended, and find the jokes humorous, that I tell such jokes, and even then it wasn't I who started the trend with my friends (believe it or not it was the Dutch friend, who started the trend by [i]poking fun at his own frugality[/i].

      There are many different types of people out there. Some of us can enjoy a good laugh at someone else's expense (especially our own expense), so long as the joke is meant in good fun and not intended to hurt them, and when we get together the stereotypes will fly right out the window and we'll all have a great time making fun of each other, but most of all making fun of people who actually believe the racist, sexist material we use :P.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    40. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you.

    41. Re:All I know by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      Woah, you're saying the women who work in IT have members of the opposite sex trying to ask them out all the time? That must be awful...

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    42. Re:All I know by Opie812 · · Score: 1

      You sound like a real blast to hang out with.

      Please accept my apologies on behalf of all the people who have been blown up throughout history. When I say "blast" I did not mean to infer that they were as boring as you.

      HAND.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    43. Re:All I know by syousef · · Score: 1

      I'm male but when I was 18 working my first IT job (before I went back and got a degree) I'd be asked to make the coffee when visitors came to our office. Fortunately I don't drink coffee and my coffee making skills are truly awful. So I learnt that if you make bad coffee you never get thought of as the coffee boy. Valuable lesson. Do it incompetently enough and you'll not be asked to do it ever again. Like I said I don't drink coffee but by all accounts man that was some undrinkable shit I served.

      Used the same trick recently on a visiting priest that decided to drop by unannounced at 9:30pm and bible bash us while denouncing evolution in the usual way creationists do. Unfortunately he drank the coffee I made - filter coffee made as if it was instant (a genuine but convenient stuff up on my part).

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    44. Re:All I know by JustCallMeRich · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new female overlords. :)

      --
      http://Communityville.com - A free place for new and old neighborhood webmasters to hang out.
    45. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So you're saying it's a little bit like dating with none of the upsides?

    46. Re:All I know by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      then: sudo make me a sandwich

    47. Re:All I know by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, not always true, I know I am a geek, and been one since I was seven, yet I don't have any problems scouting for girlfriends. Although finding the "right one" is not always easy, in general I think the old stereotype of "geeks" not finding girlfriends, is false. I certainly find ladies seek more geeks these days, than the usual jock from the football pitch.

      Mind you I live in London UK, and I am South Asian. I don't think that makes any difference though.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    48. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no astronaut has ever been orbiting the earth and passed through this "tail"??

      right...

    49. Re:All I know by harry666t · · Score: 1

      that's 22 days, full moon cycle is ~28 days dude.

    50. Re:All I know by slyborg · · Score: 1

      Coffee's for CLOSERS!

    51. Re:All I know by arbarbonif · · Score: 1

      I am ultimately secure in this fact. So much so that I don't feel the need to cut them down with misogynist humor. Instead, I prefer to treat them and others the way I prefer to be treated myself: with respect. Wow, I do the same thing! I make fun of them, just like I would prefer to be treated. Respect is highly overrated, 'respect me' is usually perverted to mean 'fear me'. I can respect you and make fun of you at the same time. If I don't respect you, I don't find you worthy of the effort of making fun of you (and for that matter being unable to take a joke will make me respect you less).

      I don't like any humor based on race, gender, or any other attribute beyond the control of the subject (including height, weight, disability, etc). By your logic, I must be the most prejudiced person ever. That is pretty much the conclusion I would come to. That and/or you have no sense of humor. Out of curiosity what would you consider to be something suitable for jokes? I assume that stupidity would fall in the same section as weight and/or disability. I am much more inclined to make fun of people for things they have no control of, because that way (even if it is taken wrongly) it is not an indictment of their choices in life, but a statement on the universe in general.
    52. Re:All I know by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      She works in IT. She dosen't make sandwiches, she makes the coffee, you insensitive clod! technically, wouldn't it be IT working in her?
    53. Re:All I know by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      If you are indeed so secure, why are you posting AC? the people you're complaining about didn't.

    54. Re:All I know by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Funny

      My preferred option for those 6 days is to have a hot standby.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    55. Re:All I know by drik00 · · Score: 1

      You gotta love the fact that this guy posted as an AC...

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    56. Re:All I know by iNaya · · Score: 1

      How dare you deride food makers you occupationist thug!

      "just foodmakers"...

      I respect people who make food much more than IT. Would you rather have an interblag, or would you prefer a nice juicy steak...

      Oh. I'm talking to /. Oh well.

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
    57. Re:All I know by ultranova · · Score: 1

      There was a Scotsman, an Englishman and an.. oh wait, you probably wouldn't get it anyway..

      Well, how could he, when it has such fantastical creatures as a Scotch man ? Everyone knows they all wear skirts there.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    58. Re:All I know by somersault · · Score: 1

      I was wearing my kilt to a wedding on friday actually, but I wear it well ;) Even when I had long hair I still looked pretty manly in it, I have to say :D

      Also, read up on Scotch. I understand it's still used in America, but personally I just think of Scotch as a type of whiskey! :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    59. Re:All I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut your uppermost cockhole, bitch.

  2. If we want to go to the moon by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    We need to test this if we go to the moon. Well that, or get mutant astronauts ;)

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:If we want to go to the moon by Walzmyn · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this be realitivy easy to test? Just shoot something up there and have it sit though one of these episodes and see if anything bad happens. I would think it'd be cheeper than going to Saturn or something.

    2. Re:If we want to go to the moon by arivanov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Russian rovers have happily survived through it.

      They were however idle during the night and ran on electronics which are considerably less prone to radiation problems.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:If we want to go to the moon by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oops... Should have read it again before posting. The happy event happens during full moon when it is nicely lit by the sun so the rovers have indeed experienced it and none of them has observed any such wierd things. They were up there for months so I this is mostly likely not the kind of problem to worry about. It is least likely to be even close to the amount of radiation pounding a station will get during a solar storm.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:If we want to go to the moon by daveime · · Score: 1

      They were however idle during the night and ran on clockwork, elastic bands, and pieces of string which are considerably less prone to radiation problems. There, fixed that for you :-)

    5. Re:If we want to go to the moon by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The moon is always nicely lit with sun light on one side; the reason the full moon is full is because the illuminated day side is facing the Earth's unilluminating night side. That also means that the moon is orbiting into the region that the solar wind "pushes" the magnetosphere toward, which is what creates the posible problem which is most likely worst on the nightside that isn't facing the Earth

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:If we want to go to the moon by Supergibbs · · Score: 1

      Except when a lunar eclipse occurs, then the moon is completely dark for a few moments. It just happened a couple months ago. :-)

      --
      First post! (just in case I am...)
    7. Re:If we want to go to the moon by Supergibbs · · Score: 1

      Except when a lunar eclipse occurs, then the moon is completely dark for a few moments. It just happened a couple months ago. :-)

      --
      First post! (just in case I am...)
    8. Re:If we want to go to the moon by gumbi+west · · Score: 1
      The moon spins about it's polls relative to the sun, but does not spin about its axis relative to the Earth. So the moon has an approximately 29.5 day long "moon day." As such, if you sit in one spot for 29.5 days, you will see one sun rise and one sun set.

      The moon is in the magnetosphere's tail when it is "behind" the Earth (relative to the sun), and it is the solar wind that carries out the magnetic field. During this time, the moon is "sitting" in the area near Earth's shadow (hence, lunar eclipses happens only during a full moon).

    9. Re:If we want to go to the moon by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Doah, I even watched the eclipse too!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    10. Re:If we want to go to the moon by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      The moon is always nicely lit with sun light on one side

      Not always... During a lunar eclipse the moon isn't lit (directly) by the sun.

      </nitpick>

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
  3. Full Moon on Moon? by $0.02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The moon stays inside Earth's 'magnetotail' for six days every month â" during full moon. Wouldn't that be full earth instead?

    --
    If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    1. Re:Full Moon on Moon? by SixArmedJesus · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... it would probably actually be during a "new earth".

      --

      *slight crashing sound*
    2. Re:Full Moon on Moon? by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it would be a "new Earth", which happens from the moon's viewpoint when Earth sees a full moon. A full Earth, from the moon's viewpoint, would happen two weeks later when the moon is "new" and not in the tail at all. Since a "new Earth" and a "full moon" happen at the same time, the full moon reference is perfectly correct and makes more sense.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    3. Re:Full Moon on Moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it would be a "new Earth", which happens from the moon's viewpoint when Earth sees a full moon. It could also be called Earth in transit.
  4. Silly by Robert1 · · Score: 1

    "The ground, meanwhile, might leap into the sky. There's growing evidence that fine particles of moondust might actually float, ejected from the lunar surface by electrostatic repulsion. This could create a temporary nighttime atmosphere of dust ready to blacken spacesuits, clog machinery, scratch faceplates (moondust is very abrasive) and generally make life difficult for astronauts."

    If this were the case, the entire moon's surface-particles floating above the planet 6 days each month, we would have already seen it. If not with naked eyes then with telescopes. We can see localized dust storms on Mars, I can only imagine what a planet-wide de-surfacing would look like. Ridiculous.

    1. Re:Silly by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 1

      If this were the case, the entire moon's surface-particles floating above the planet 6 days each month, we would have already seen it. If not with naked eyes then with telescopes. We can see localized dust storms on Mars, I can only imagine what a planet-wide de-surfacing would look like. Ridiculous.

      Not only that - but moon-dust would be worn against itself, and would not be so abrasive, friction would have done it's work on the particles...

      -- Pete.


    2. Re:Silly by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I'm just amazed how all of the particles drop down into the exact same spots when they are done floating, and how they don't rub against each other causing erosion on the surface. Of course maybe we just can't tell with it being made out of green cheese and all.

    3. Re:Silly by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      So just spray some water on it, that will keep the dust down. :)

    4. Re:Silly by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      If this were the case, the entire moon's surface-particles floating above the planet 6 days each month, we would have already seen it. If not with naked eyes then with telescopes. We can see localized dust storms on Mars, I can only imagine what a planet-wide de-surfacing would look like. Ridiculous.

      No one's suggesting Martian-scale mega-dust-storms. Rising on electrostatic repulsion alone, and lacking any great wind to blow it about, this would not be visible with any telescope from Earth, or even from lunar orbit.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  5. Fix from article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "So far, this is pure speculation: no man has been on the moon" Fixed.

    1. Re:Fix from article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am glad that someone posted this.

    2. Re:Fix from article by phreakincool · · Score: 1

      The various races of aliens that live there don't want us there...they only want our souls.

    3. Re:Fix from article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "So far, this is pure speculation: no man has been on the moon" Fixed.
      One reply seemed to take this seriously, not as a joke, so I'll bite too.

      To believe that the moon landing never happened as per Fox documentary (oxymoron?) you would have to..

      .. believe that Soviet and China was in on the conspiracy, at the height of the cold war when this was a major blow to them. They could easily have disproved a fake moon landing, and choose to let US revel in glory instead..?

      .. believe that all the actual moon rock available to scientists and universities is... what?

      That's just two Occams Razor points, not going into NASAs rebuttals against the so called photo evidence.
    4. Re:Fix from article by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      So far, this is pure speculation: no man has been

      Fixed. After all, I think, therefore I am. The rest of you are just figments of my twisted, self-flagellating imagination...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:Fix from article by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      ".. believe that Soviet and China was in on the conspiracy, at the height of the cold war when this was a major blow to them. They could easily have disproved a fake moon landing, and choose to let US revel in glory instead..?" Well...

      First, they would need better evidence than what the fake moon landing yahoos trot out. Since I haven't seen any, I'd feel pretty secure that it doesn't exist.

      Of course, just for fun, let's say it does exist. Let's say the whole thing was fake and Russia and/or China figured it out. Let's also consider the time period.

      To say that it was "the height of the cold war" is dubious. Remember that Nixon, elected in 1968, ushered in a new era of "Détente." The Soviet Union could have used information about the fake moon landing to gain advantages at the SALT (Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty) talks. Furthermore, there was quite a bit of tension between the Soviet Union and China during the late 1960s and early 1970s. China was looking for an ally in the United States and wouldn't hurt that by bringing forth evidence that the landing was a fraud.

      As you say, the best evidence is the moon rocks. Of course, the Soviet Union has a small amount of lunar soil from their missions to the moon, but they never sent anyone...
    6. Re:Fix from article by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      To believe that the moon landing never happened as per Fox documentary (oxymoron?) you would have to..

      Yep... much like "Michael Moore documentary" or "Al Gore documentary." The words just don't go together in serious conversation.

  6. Not every month by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the moon doesn't pass through Earth's magnetotail every month-- the moon's orbit is inclined to the ecliptic, so some months the magnetotail passes north or south of the moon-- it depends on season and precession.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Not every month by spazdor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quite right. Otherwise there'd be a lunar and a solar eclipse every month.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    2. Re:Not every month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true only if the Earth's magnetotail has a small cross section, akin to its optical shadow. If the tail is rather broad, however, the moon's inclined orbit won't necessarily keep it out of the tail. Do you have specific data on this?

    3. Re:Not every month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary says "six days every month" which implies that the Moon is in it the magnetotail +/- 3 days around full moon, or that the magnetotail spans +/- 36 degrees. The Moon's inclination with the ecliptic is only 5 degrees which is not enough to make it pass North or South of the tail.

    4. Re:Not every month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong. The magnetotail is much wider than you think. Consider that it covers six days worth of lunar orbit (or 72 degrees). The inclination of the lunar orbit relative to the ecliptic is utterly insignificant in comparison.

    5. Re:Not every month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even the most conservative estimate indicates the moon always passes through the magnetotail, because the earth's magnetotail is much larger than the earth's shadow. Here's my calculation. If I made a mistake, please correct me.

      The Magnetotail is 20-25 Re(earth radii) across depending on season(minimum 10 Re in radius); much bigger than the shadow of the earth(2 Re). The moon's orbit is inclined 5% off the ecliptic(the plane of earth's orbit around the sun). The earth's magnetotail is essentially in this plane. The moon is at a distance of 405696 km at apogee (~60 Re). This means even at the point when the moon is furthest from the ecliptic plane (ie apogee is coaligned with the magnetotail) it will still fall inside the magnetotail.

      60.24 * sin((5./180)*pi) = 5.25 Re < 10 Re

      Thus, precession or no, the moon will always be in the magnetotail for at least part of each orbit. It would take extremely extraordinary(read: improbable) solar wind conditions to make the magnetotail thin to 5 Re.

  7. Ahem by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just one example of what might go on that we can't see with regards to lunar dust storms. Took me all of a few seconds to find and there looks to be a lot more to read. Google is your friend.

    1. Re:Ahem by Jerry · · Score: 1

      Moon dust agitated by the passage of the terminator line may account for several things, including the gradual erosion of the footprints left on the Moon by the astronauts, but it won't explain problems due to the Earth's magnetotail.

      In all diagrams of the Earth's magnetic shield and tail one notices that the Earth is at the strongest point of the Magnetic field, and that the Moon is 60 Earth radii away from source of the magnetic fields. Compared to the magnetic field at the surface of the Earth the magnetic field strength in the vicinity of the Moon must be at least 8.6e^-19 weaker. Electrostatic effects of the passage of the Solar Wind must be MUCH stronger, and the astronauts were fully exposed to that with no appreciable harm or side effects.

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    2. Re:Ahem by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      My point was that just because we can't see it from Earth doesn't mean it isn't happening. There's much we do not know.

  8. People on the moon by BklynRaised · · Score: 1

    this article should have read: Roland Piquepaille writes "Researchers working for NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission have discovered that the Earth's magnetic tail could be harmful to future astronauts. The moon stays inside Earth's 'magnetotail' for six days every month â" during full moon. This can have consequences ranging from lunar 'dust storms' to strong electrostatic discharges, according to one researcher quoted by NASA in 'The Moon and the Magnetotail.' So far, this is pure speculation: no HUMAN has been on the moon when the magnetotail hits. As added the same scientist, 'Apollo astronauts never landed on a full moon and they never experienced the magnetotail.' But read more for additional details about how Earth's magnetotail could affect HUMANS on the moon."

    1. Re:People on the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You shut your whore mouth when men are talking.

      And go make me a sammich.

  9. Magneto Tail? by that+IT+girl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one who can't get past the image of the villain from X-Men? ;)

    --
    10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
    20 DRINK COFFEE
    30 GOTO 10
    1. Re:Magneto Tail? by rrohbeck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Am I the only one who can't get past the image of the villain from X-Men? ;) Probably. The majority here are guys, and we don't associate "tail" with "villain from X-Men."

      Or if we do, we won't tell because that would be gay :P
    2. Re:Magneto Tail? by AaxelB · · Score: 1

      Well, it might make sense to think of Polaris, Magneto's daughter, who has the same powers as her father, green hair, and impressive tail.

    3. Re:Magneto Tail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you're ruining my gay fantasy of an X-men villian's tail, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Magneto Tail? by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

      What's a "Magneto"?

      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
  10. Now we know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But read more for additional details about how Earth's magnetotail could affect men on the moon." That's why Jackie Gleason wanted to send ladies to the moon.
    1. Re:Now we know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jackie Gleason was a wife beater, plain and simple.

    2. Re:Now we know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His wife didn't listen. Plain and simple

  11. Mental image: by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny

    Crowd of corpulent Southerners at a Crawfish Tail Fry somewhere on the Redneck Rivera dropping trou' to moon a luxury liner passing by.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Mental image: by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, I live in the South and know PLENTY of people who would do this in a heartbeat!

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
  12. moot by McGiraf · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is moot, as we all know they will not make it thought the Radiation Belt anyway.

    1. Re:moot by McGiraf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      lol, interesting? wtf? Oh, and by the way, the earth is flat. Yup, seriously.

    2. Re:moot by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      An interesting and an insightful, on two false theories. I really hope some moderator is just having fun...

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  13. Easily Fixed by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Valid use for tinfoil hats found at last.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:Easily Fixed by alex4u2nv · · Score: 1

      I think if you're getting tail for 6 days, a rubber hat is the way to go.

  14. Will it harm them? Only if they're real. by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    Dude, visitors are real.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  15. Safe Space Travel by byronne · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alas, the days where one could travel to the moon in comfort and safety are behind us. Now it is nearly as hazardous as trying to merge onto 294.

    --
    "Look, Smithers! I'm Davy Crockett!"
  16. Full Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moon Police Officer #1: Looks like a full Earth tonight.
    Moon Police Officer #2: Yup. All the crazies will be out for sure.

  17. Re:what happened to tags? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what happened to the tags that users were able to contribute in the past? Yes some people were submitting 30 character tags and abusing the system but that was short lived. It's a shame that Slashdot has become less interactive where user feedback and contributions are relegated to the ghetto of comments and paying $10-$20 for an accepted submission like Piquepaille and that Imaginary Property guy. I don't see anything different from previous. The tags are there, and so is the small triangle, clicking on which opens the line where you can enter tags.
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  18. Giant, predictable magnetic distrubance? by toastee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like a great opportunity to harness the energy potential. this could very well be useful.

    --
    - Better to speak your mind than to remain silent, or someone may speak for you.
  19. how about ISS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    why isn't the ISS affected by the "magnetic tail"? It has to pass trough it.

    1. Re:how about ISS? by Washii · · Score: 1

      I'd assume that it isn't ever actually passing in and out of the magnetosphere to cause charge differentials.

      I believe it would have to be further out for that.

    2. Re:how about ISS? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      According to wikkipedia, the closest part of the magnetosphere is 70000km away from the surface, while the ISS is orbiting at an altitide of routhly 350km. In fact, the low altitude of the ISS protects it from most of the nasty radiations that a moon base could receive, so the shielding was not a difficult issue for the ISS.

  20. Simple Solution by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine what it feels like to be a sock pulled crackling from a dryer. Astronauts on the moon during a magnetotail crossing might be able to tell you. Walking across the dusty charged-up lunar terrain, the astronauts themselves would gather a load of excess charge. Touching another astronaut, a doorknob, a piece of sensitive electronics -- any of these simple actions could produce an unwelcome discharge.

    There's a simple solution to the excessive static discharge, all NASA needs to do is get a dryer sheet the size of Michigan. Plus, it would have the added bonus of being able to be used as a giant parachute, ala pre-school... think about how high you could bounce with that thing.

    1. Re:Simple Solution by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      You guys jumped on dryer sheets at your school? Daaaang freaky lil short kids.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  21. MegaMan by kurtis25 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't we defeat magnetotail back in MegaMan 3 using our Plasma Buster?

  22. Roland the Plogger again by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's Roland the Plogger, wrong as usual.

    It's not like this is a newly discovered phenomenon. After all, there have been many unmanned moon landings and equipment has operated through the "magnetotail" many times. The USSR landed two lunar rovers, both of which worked for months. Lunokhod 1 was operational for 322 days, and Lunokhod 2 was operational for about four months. This was in the early 1970s.

    1. Re:Roland the Plogger again by Cecil · · Score: 4, Funny

      This was in the early 1970s.

      See, there's your problem. The magnetotail wasn't so big back then, because of the ozone hole and global warming and oprah winfrey. Also, gnomes did it.

    2. Re:Roland the Plogger again by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, you seen how much metal is in the average SUV? And all that magnetic energy isn't being blocked because we got rid of the Ozone which was regulating it. It's a danger to us all.

      This has been an official message from the Anti Global-Magnetizing association. Always remember to buy cheap cars, since they have less metal in them.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    3. Re:Roland the Plogger again by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Informative
      And Roland got his "for more information" link to his blog through again. Recently the editors have omitted these (though if you look in the firehose, Roland puts his spammy blog link in every submission).

      Tagged "blogspam" and "fuckroland".

    4. Re:Roland the Plogger again by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It's not like this is a newly discovered phenomenon. After all, there have been many unmanned moon landings and equipment has operated through the "magnetotail" many times. The USSR landed two lunar rovers, both of which worked for months. Lunokhod 1 was operational for 322 days, and Lunokhod 2 was operational for about four months. This was in the early 1970s.

      Not to mention the ALSEP instrument packages left behind by the Apollo landing missions - many of them still operational in 1977 when the program was terminated. There have also been a half dozen or so lunar orbiting probes of various kinds.
  23. Electrostatic discharge ? by d3m0nCr4t · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are going to need one hell of a cable to earth that...

    1. Re:Electrostatic discharge ? by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

      Dude, what do you think is the reason for the Space Elevator? Launching stuff into space? Pfft.

      They're secretly going to siphon all the energy off of the earths magnetosphere. They're going to use that electricity to power up the SDI (you don't think they stopped building it did you?). That way if they see any demonstrators in Washington DC they can just Zap them with Masers. (For those who have forgotten what a MASER is, it was invented before the LASER and it does Microwaves.) The other problem is that the Magnetosphere is the only thing keeping the weaker ALIEN mind control rays from forcing us to lose all of our precious bodily fluids. Why do you think astronauts come back all weak & stuff when they've been in space? They get spontaneously weaker? You believed that? No, its because their fluids got DRAINED man!

      Keep yer tinfoil hat on!

      --
      They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  24. Re:All I know [OT] by Hercynium · · Score: 1

    You'd *love* the place where I just started working. Yes, there's certainly a predominance of males in the engineering and IT departments, but it's quite impressive how many women are working here - in highly technical roles - and every day since I got here I get the sense that this company only hires the best they can get. Right across the street from MIT, as you you could surmise, what they get is pretty damn good :)

    --
    I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
  25. Magnetotail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pfft. That's nothing.

    You guys should witness the destruction in the wake of my roommate's burritotail...

  26. Re:how convenient.. by Lijemo · · Score: 1

    The thing is-- It would have been a heck of a lot more difficult to successfully pull off a faked moon landing, and keep it secret (especially without the Soviets calling us on it quite loudly) than it was to actually go to the moon.

  27. Mmmm floating cheese by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good thing to me, not only do you get a lovely platter at the end of your meal, but the thing floats above the plate. Talk about a light meal...

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  28. Will the Earth's Tail Fry Moon Visitors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the Earth's Tail Fry Moon Visitors?

    Is it a stretch to say I read:

    Will the Earth's Soleil Moon Frye Visitors?

    I mean her.

  29. The real question is, of course... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    ...how the moon's magnetotail would affect theoretical people on the Earth. We never went there, you know. It's scientifically impossible.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  30. A name for this effect? by Microsift · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, while the Moon is positioned such that it reflects the Sun's rays back at earth, astronauts could get fried, would that be a Soleil Moon Frye?

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  31. BBQ by Kernel+Violator · · Score: 1

    A George Foreman BBQ on the moon now that would be sweet.

  32. Only a few words by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    I don't know why there seems to such a scare in the article. The Earth's magnetic force is one gauss. This is not something to really be terribly concerned about. I mean really one stinking Gauss. Sure it covers a large distance, but this tail has got to be really weak at even the Moon's closest approach to Earth. It's more likely Earth's gravitational pull has a larger impact and cause of dust storms on the Moon than it's totally lame Magnetic tail.

  33. Tags by isthisorigional · · Score: 1

    where's the 'ohnoitsroland' tag? would have saved me a couple minutes.

  34. This was brought up in 1956 then 2005: by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Informative

    A detailed look at this can be found in this link from Nasa on the topic of moon fountains, which is basically the exact same thing under a different name.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  35. So we send a probe to the moon? by Taelron · · Score: 1

    I mean haven't we already sent probes and satelites to the moon already, why havent they discovered this? So we send a probe to the moon to test this and if it pans out we buy all the astronaugts tinfoil underwear...

  36. Re: your sig by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    01010111 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01100110 00100000 01001001 00100000 01101010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01101110 01111001 01100010 01100010 01101100 01100101 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100010 01101001 01110100 00111111

  37. comment by stalepie · · Score: 1

    No man landed on the moon period, you mean.

  38. Re:what happened to tags? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of the more interesting tags, and some of the less important ones, don't show up anymore. I enjoyed seeing some articles with a "yes" tag and "sharskwithlasers" tags, and then other stories with "yes" and "no" and "maybe" tags all at once. I dislike our current tags, and wish it went back to the original.

  39. Mental Floss! by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    There's a picture I don't want wedged between my insights.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  40. Full Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds funny when you say, 'Apollo astronauts never landed on a full moon and they never experienced the magnetotail.'
    It makes it sound like the moon is physically different when it is 'full'. It should say 'Apollo astronauts never landed on the moon when it appeared full from Earth.'

    Paul

  41. Obvious Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Land on the dark side?

    1. Re:Obvious Solution by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      I trust that's a joke.

  42. Can we use this to genrate power for moon base? by thope · · Score: 1

    If the Earth's magnetotail is strong enough to worry about affects on astronauts, can we use it to our benefit and generate electricty to power the "moon base". If the passage through the magnetic field is periodic, it sounds like a perfect implemntation of generator effect. Plus, with such a strong field - and large capacity storage - it may be possible to generate all required power over the 6 day period of tail crossing and store the remainder for use during tail non-crossing.
    Sounds like it would at least be worth investigating?

    1. Re:Can we use this to genrate power for moon base? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      If I'm remembering my electromagnetism theory correctly you would have to be moving through the magnetic field pretty quickly. The question is, "Is the moon traveling at a high enough velocity to generate enough electricity to sustain the moon base?"

      Remember, earth has it's own magnetic field that we experience every day. However, the earth's rotation is not fast enough to generate a significant amount of electricity. In my college physics class we calculated that if you ran a piece of wire from wingtip to wingtip of the Concorde, the amount of electricity generated by its movement through the earth's magnetic field on it's way from New York to London could make a piece of toast.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  43. Faraday Cage by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they just make the moon base be a giant Faraday cage and not go outside for six days a month?

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  44. Versus hard radiation, magneto-tails are easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Apollo astronauts dealt with hard radiation on their trip to the moon, because they passed outside the magnetosphere. I suspect there's a lot more danger in that than there is in having the tail pass through. Ions are fairly easy to shield -- gamma rays are difficult.

  45. Science Explains All by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    Now at last I have an inkling of how werewolves come to be.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  46. Re: your sig by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 1

    'nibble' is spelled with an 'i'

    --
    "Little is much when little you need."
  47. Re: your sig by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    Oh ye of no sense of humor, and no appreciation for a good bit of wordplay....

    And if you're really feeling pedantic, it depends on when you learned it and where you learned it from. Even Donald Knuth uses nybble.

  48. Aren't we trying for underground facilities anyway by dsmall · · Score: 1

    Given the radiation from "Our Mr. Sun" in daytime, aren't we designing for underground facilities on the Moon anyway?

    Three to six feet of dirt stops quite a bit of gamma . . .

      -- Dave

  49. Re: your sig by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 1

    *begs* You were supposed to say something about certain groups that don't believe in nybbles *cough*Commonwealth hackers*cough*

    --
    "Little is much when little you need."