Slashdot Mirror


Homer Simpson Drawn With Web 2.0-Style ASCII Art

boogi78 writes "Remember ASCII art? This is the Web 2.0 CSS version of ASCII art featuring Homer Simpson. Here is a CSS G.W. Bush. There's also an program that automatically converts jpegs into 'CSS images,' but it's a Windows executable. I found no sources for it, but I got it to work with WINE."

160 comments

  1. art? by the+brown+guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Remember ASCII art?" If you're asking, you must be new here.
    --
    Orbis terrarum est non altus satis
    1. Re:art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least it's not back in pog form.

    2. Re:art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      if you're asciing, you must be old here.

    3. Re:art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine this used for captchas!

    4. Re:art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vlc has ascii video output

    5. Re:art? by SacredByte · · Score: 1

      Although I would not consider all ASCII arranged to approxomate images to be art. Just look at all those "Slashdot Sux0rz" posts. *shudders*

  2. Original Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Original pouet thread which this spawned:
    http://pouet.net/topic.php?which=5204&page=1

  3. Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by aarku · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sameish idea: DeImg from The Daily Grind Network.

    1. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sameish idea: DeImg from The Daily Grind Network. AKA how to turn a 30k image into a 6 meg browser killing table.
    2. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sameish idea: DeImg from The Daily Grind Network.

      Actually, this is a bit different - and much more unique and impressive, IMHO. I can't get to the first link (slashdotted already), but the Bush portrait and this Homer are both made using overlapping bits of various font characters, sized and colored using CSS, to make the curves and lines of the picture.

      View source on that Homer "image" to see what I mean - the artist basically used font characters as a palette of vectors, and clipped out just the partial shape of each character that he wanted, using CSS properties.

      As a result, instead of bloating to many MB, that Homer picture is only ~16KB. Bush is only ~32KB.

      Translating pixels into an HTML table is not that interesting now.. I mean, I was excited when my brother wrote an app to do that about 8 years ago, and I even wrote a little companion app that parsed ANSI escape sequences and turned ANSI art into HTML tables too, but that was back then. :)

      This, on the other hand, is really original and unique. I'm pretty impressed by it.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by ramk13 · · Score: 1

      I think my browser (Firefox) cried while it was trying to render that table. And my computer isn't that slow (C2Q Q6600 @ 3.0 GhZ). That was ridiculous.

    4. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember doing something similar as well. There was this one program (can't remember what it's called) that would turn a .png file into an easily parsable format, something like: Num rows: X Num cols: Y #CCCCCC #CCCCCC #CCCCCC etc. I then created a script to read this file, and to turn each pixel into a css element and display it in the proper position on the page. It was pretty neat, but it was painfully slow and made it impossible to save the image (short of print screen). It looked just like a real image though.

    5. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 5, Funny

      But of course! That's what Web 2.0 is all about: turning simple applications with a bit of necessary networking into unmanageably complex monstrosities requiring a full data-center and a plugged-up, memory-gobbling web browser to support one measly user and brought to life by the power of Great Cthulhu.

    6. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      In its defense, I've seen stuff like this used to get around firewall or web filtering limitations. ;)

      Gestapo blocking jpegs? Get someone to convert it to an ascii format and render it in the browser.

    7. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      And to make matters worse, they did a picture of George Bush to demonstrate their technology! Talk about a joke!

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    8. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Watch him grow a character at a time:

      http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/200805/css_homer_animated.html

      (apparently the site is down, someone must have already linked it from somewhere that drives traffic)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      While it is nice that you can resise the page text and see it grow, it does take up more space to store the CSS version than the original JPG.

      The software author's example with image.jpg goes from 13322 to 42564 as CSS output.

      Less resolution, bigger size, doesn't make sense to me, other than a cool hack. It's a step above, but much like the mplayer + aalib ascii output for video. It's really not that useful, unless you want to play videos on a 486 or something ;-p

    10. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > While it is nice that you can resise the page text and see it grow, it does
      > take up more space to store the CSS version than the original JPG.

      How about an apples-to-apples comparo? That's probably not an uncompressed (dcam-style) JPG -- so let's compress the CSS. Pretty much any browser more recent than Netscape Navigator 2 will handle deflate.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    11. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 1

      So would this work for captcha images?

      If so would it defeat the captcha breaking algorithms, after all you could not process it as an image and processing the source without it being rendered would be damn near impossible.

      Thoughts?

    12. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by The+Redster! · · Score: 1

      A well-generated source, I think, could make processing without rendering(at least to some degree) difficult. But even if that's true, rendering the CSS is certainly possible (the browser can do it, after all). This would also mean that for a given browser, the CSS must be appropriately rendered to be a usable captcha on that browser. I don't know how hard THAT is, but judging from some of the other comments, that's not going quite 100% for Homer.

    13. Re:Seen this long ago for Mac OS X by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 1

      So would this work for captcha images?

      Interesting thought. I like it just because it's such a cool hack, but it might actually be useful too. :)

      As another poster pointed out, some work would have to be done making it cross-browser-compatible first (and to deal with missing fonts, etc). But aside from that, it might be a useful step forward in the arms race against CAPTCHA crackers.

      It wouldn't be an absolute solution - if I was trying to crack it, I'd probably embed Gecko in to my program, let Gecko render it just as a user would see it, then grab the rendered image as pixels and move on as before - but it would raise the bar somewhat..

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  4. Nothing like having my portrait done in CSS by HomerJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's the most beautiful thing these eyes have ever seen....well except for Marge, when she wears that blue thing with the things.

  5. Web 2.0? by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So now using CSS and JavaScript is a criterion for "Web 2.0"? When will it end?

    --
    "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
    1. Re:Web 2.0? by brucifer · · Score: 5, Informative

      So now using CSS and JavaScript is a criterion for "Web 2.0"? When will it end? When "Web 3.0" hits
    2. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If web 2.0 is dynamic interactive application like content, web 1.0 is all those "boring" sites which came before.

      What was .0 the mid 90s web of sliced to hell images, frames, and animated gif based technologies.

    3. Re:Web 2.0? by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 3, Funny

      When "Web 3.0" hits Ah. Can't wait.
      --
      "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
    4. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ah, if Web 2.0 entails the use of CSS and JavaScript, that must mean Web 3.0 will be coming out with something truly fantastic... perhaps they'll introduce something called HTML? On a more serious note, people who use the terms "Web 2.0" and "AJAX"** should not have jobs. Nor should their bosses if they are actually impressed by "buzz words" that are anything but.

      ** Yes, "AJAX", not "Ajax". It's an acronym, and no amount of "omg let's make it sound more amazing than it really is by making it a normal-looking word" is going to change that.

    5. Re:Web 2.0? by BBrown · · Score: 4, Informative
      Agree. Using CSS is NOT a Web 2.0 application. I would expect better from /.ers.

      Recommend those curious read O'Reilly's definition here:
        http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
       
      Since he coined it, he's probably pretty accurate. A lot of it generally includes user-generated content and the transition from single publisher sites (NYTimes) to community driven sites (blogs, Yelp!, etc.)

      Here's a table he uses to explain the difference:
       

      Web 1.0 -> Web 2.0
      DoubleClick -> Google AdSense
      Ofoto -> Flickr
      Akamai -> BitTorrent
      mp3.com -> Napster
      Britannica Online -> Wikipedia
      personal websites -> blogging
      evite -> upcoming.org and EVDB
      domain name speculation -> search engine optimization
      page views -> cost per click
      screen scraping -> web services
      publishing -> participation
      content management systems -> wikis
      directories (taxonomy) -> tagging ("folksonomy")
      stickiness -> syndication
    6. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Web 2.0 can't really be defined as anything, it's merely a buzzword. It just happens to be associated with ajax 99% of the time and someone made the link with javascript.

    7. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except napster had fuck-all to do with the web.

    8. Re:Web 2.0? by infonography · · Score: 1

      about half of these are right, not to knock your post. but napster was before mp3.com and then redux. so i guess napster is web 2.1

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    9. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about half of these are right, not to knock your post. but napster was before mp3.com and then redux. so i guess napster is web 2.1 Agreed. People who never used the original Napster (such as O'Reilly) probably shouldn't talk about Napster. Meaning over 99% of all people on the web today.
    10. Re:Web 2.0? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Agree. Using CSS is NOT a Web 2.0 application. I would expect better from /.ers.

      However, if you add some XML in there somewhere, it should qualify.

      Since he coined it, he's probably pretty accurate.

      I find it unlikely that anyone counting BitTorrent as a Web application is particularly accurate. Unless, of course, he meant the BitTorrent sites, but how are those principally different from a forum where you could post links to ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    11. Re:Web 2.0? by pbhj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Web 3.0 will be coming out with something truly fantastic... perhaps they'll introduce something called HTML? I know that was a tongue-in-cheek rhetorical question but ... I'm hoping "web 3.0" will have wide use of SVG. When I can design webpages like I design the previews in a vector editor ... no hang on, that might put me out of a job - please stick to the current mess.

      Carry on.
    12. Re:Web 2.0? by omeomi · · Score: 1

      "Web 2.0" is clearly just a meaningless buzz-word, but "AJAX" has a relatively distinct and understandable meaning. The use of the XMLHttpRequest to alter portions of a page without reloading the whole page seems like it should have _some_ name, especially since we all remember a time when it was basically impossible to do. AJAX is as good a name as any other.

    13. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't this be "Funny" not "Insightful"? Now I'm scared...

    14. Re:Web 2.0? by Dan541 · · Score: 2

      I'm sick of the whole "Web 2.0" buzz word that those media asshats keep spreading all over the place.

      It almost as bad as "Information super highway"

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    15. Re:Web 2.0? by Mathinker · · Score: 5, Funny

      If we're really lucky, after that we'll get Web 3.1, Web 3.14, Web 3.141, ...
      But don't hold your breath waiting...

    16. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cynical part of me wants to say that he made that entire list up just for page hits. The intelligent side assures me he did. It just sounds that contrived!

    17. Re:Web 2.0? by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you sure that's the progression? I thought Web 3.1 would be followed by Web 3.11, and then by Web for Workgroups.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    18. Re:Web 2.0? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of web-applications. Why can't someone just write a damned native program anymore?

    19. Re:Web 2.0? by NotBorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Recommend those curious read O'Reilly's definition

      That definition is 5 pages long. No wonder no one knows what it is. Or perhaps "definition" is not really the word you're looking. "Description" would perhaps be a better word.



      From the O'Reilly article:

      "Like many important concepts, Web 2.0 doesn't have a hard boundary, but rather, a gravitational core."


      Sounds kinda fuzzy to me. At any rate it's kind of like the words "gay" and "hacker." They don't mean what they used to mean and you can't really do much about that. Use different wording if you want to be understood.



      The term "Web 2.0" has been pwnt.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    20. Re:Web 2.0? by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What was .0 the mid 90s web of sliced to hell images, frames, and animated gif based technologies.

      mid-90s? I swear I saw all that in MySpace just the other day

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    21. Re:Web 2.0? by harry666t · · Score: 1

      TeX has been written in Web, hasn't it? (:

    22. Re:Web 2.0? by tacocat · · Score: 1

      It's an information tube...

    23. Re:Web 2.0? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Or sewer clogged with garbage depends which way you look it it.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    24. Re:Web 2.0? by KinkyClown · · Score: 2, Funny

      These are all obsolete when Web NT will come out...

    25. Re:Web 2.0? by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Web 95, Web 98, Web 2000, Web ME, Web XP, and Web Vista.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    26. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      web 3.11 for workgroups?

    27. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But by then it'll be so awful that they'll introduce Web New Technology, or 'Web NT' for short.

    28. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I like how you think ajax and javascript are different

    29. Re:Web 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't wait for Web Millenium!

    30. Re:Web 2.0? by encoderer · · Score: 1

      "especially since we all remember a time when it was basically impossible to do"

      Sure, if you mean specifically using the XMLHttpRequest object.

      Personally, I've been using hidden iFrames (and/or <img> tags) and document.write (in the pre DOM 2.0 days) to accomplish the same thing since the late 90s.

      I wrote a tiny framework (which I named Jespecial, a name I still like more than AJAX) in both PHP4 and ASP that would take a server-side array and create a JavaScript array out of it. The array would be pushed down into JS code written on an iFrame refresh.

      I'm just sayin'...

    31. Re:Web 2.0? by omeomi · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember iFrames not working in Netscape 4.7, back when our client's spec sheets would still include Netscape 4.7 (that browser took forever to die), so they were basically useless for me.

    32. Re:Web 2.0? by towelie-ban · · Score: 1

      Web Bob! Web Bob!

    33. Re:Web 2.0? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Winternet Vista.

      The sound you hear when it is released will be a thousand geek voices crying out in terror and then being suddenly silenced.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    34. Re:Web 2.0? by mounthood · · Score: 1
      --
      tomorrow who's gonna fuss
    35. Re:Web 2.0? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Wiki's have existed for more than 10 years.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    36. Re:Web 2.0? by hero_or_what · · Score: 1

      *shudder* Think about Web Vista..

    37. Re:Web 2.0? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Web "Bob" Dobbs! Eternal salvation or triple your bandwidth back!

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  6. Seen it longer ago by mrmeval · · Score: 4, Informative

    pngtopnm | ppmtopgm | pgmnorm | pnmscale -width 80 | ppmtopgm | pgmtopbm | pbmtoascii

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    1. Re:Seen it longer ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, surely just apt-get install png2html would be easier?!

    2. Re:Seen it longer ago by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Ewwwww git that thar HTML thing OFF me! ;)

      Those don't require fancy schmancy lyebraries nor nutin!

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  7. Only one thing to say about this rubbish... by Cryacin · · Score: 2, Funny

    DOH!!!

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  8. Bored? by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Clearly this is the result of having FAR too much free time.

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    1. Re:Bored? by Ardeaem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly this is the result of having FAR too much free time. ...says the guy reading and posting on Slashdot :)
    2. Re:Bored? by MooseMuffin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking as someone with far too much free time, I've never done anything /. worthy. I imagine the same is true of many of us, so lets give the guy some credit.

    3. Re:Bored? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should start employing computer people to keep them out of trouble.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    4. Re:Bored? by Dersaidin · · Score: 1

      You could spend some time reviewing what is or is not /. worthy.

    5. Re:Bored? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Clearly this is the result of having FAR too much free time. Maybe. But it's far more respectable than the hordes of people trying to rehash a Balmer-throwing-chair joke, then the rush for people with mod points to mod it up.
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:Bored? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      To do that takes developers, developers, developers, Developers, Developers! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS!! DEVELOPERS!! DEVELOPERS!!


      (don't use so many caps. It's like Steve Ballmer.)

  9. heh, slashdotted already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like the site FTA is down.

    1. Re:heh, slashdotted already... by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

      I mean really, you'd think a little bit of css wouldn't create _that_ much bandwidth...

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    2. Re:heh, slashdotted already... by Nullav · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google cache. It doesn't animate, but the text-image is somewhat impressive.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    3. Re:heh, slashdotted already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst. Gandhi, not Ghandi.

    4. Re:heh, slashdotted already... by hendridm · · Score: 1

      It doesn't animate, but the text-image is somewhat impressive.

      The animation worked for me (FF3b5).

    5. Re:heh, slashdotted already... by Nullav · · Score: 1

      It works for me on the original site, but it still won't work on the cached page. (FF2.0.0.13)
      Disappointing. I was expecting the picture to move, rather than fade in like that.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  10. Looks like Prodigy art by jmauro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks just like the block art from Prodigy from back in 1990's. All this tech and we're back to the same place as 1995.

    1. Re:Looks like Prodigy art by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      I *liked* Prodigy! Mad Maze, the TI-85 programming board, the Metheglyn Writers' Society... (If anyone by any freak chance recognizes that last one, I would be very surprised).

      NTCA38A... Sad that I remember that.

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    2. Re:Looks like Prodigy art by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I loved Prodigy. I do remember the Mad Maze specifically.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Looks like Prodigy art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or like RIP.

    4. Re:Looks like Prodigy art by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Mad Maze was awesome.

      --
      Why not fork?
  11. Original homer link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    link in summary to some blog doesn't work already.. here's the original link:

    http://www.romancortes.com/blog/homer-css/

  12. Slashdotted by Itninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And only after 25 comments. :O(

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Slashdotted by Nalk · · Score: 1

      Homer still available on the original author's site without the animation here: http://www.romancortes.com/blog/homer-css/

  13. Nothing to see... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The site you are attempting to access is temporarily unavailable.
    If you are the site owner please contact your system administrator.


    Yeah, those are ASCII characters.

  14. Coming Soon: Cmdr Taco's Son's Fingerpaintings by STrinity · · Score: 0

    It's a yellow blur that looks like something a five year old would make upon being first introduced to PaintShop.

    But it's Web2.0, so it must be kewl.

    --
    Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    1. Re:Coming Soon: Cmdr Taco's Son's Fingerpaintings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try checking his blog http://www.romancortes.com/blog/homer-css/ and rescind your foul commentary, cur!

    2. Re:Coming Soon: Cmdr Taco's Son's Fingerpaintings by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Agreed; this must only look correct in IE. FF2 on Linux has his eyes shifted, a hole in his head, a bulge on his neck, and his nose is split in two.

    3. Re:Coming Soon: Cmdr Taco's Son's Fingerpaintings by Tacvek · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks fine on Windows with Firefox and Opera at the very least. However, it requires a specific font (Verdana) which may cause problems with some Linux systems that do not have that font installed.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  15. Slashdotted..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but not forgotten.

  16. Great, now I'm gonna have nightmares. by Perseid · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you think the blocky ASCII Dubya is bad, highlight his text. Holy crap.

    1. Re:Great, now I'm gonna have nightmares. by vsage3 · · Score: 1

      If you think the blocky ASCII Dubya is bad, highlight his text. Holy crap. Just wow
    2. Re:Great, now I'm gonna have nightmares. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Homer looks sharp by comparison.

  17. I really expected teh bush one to be by infonography · · Score: 2, Funny

    goatse

    and I would have felt it was a good likeness.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  18. Remember the printer art? by thewils · · Score: 1

    Those line printers could be coaxed to kick out some interesting pictures. I found some on a cassette tape once while clearing out a cupboard, suitable for a Datapoint machine. I seem to remember I taught myself enough Datapoint assembler to be able to print them out.

    I must have been desperate back then...

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  19. Can't get it to work by mmortal03 · · Score: 1

    I tried it on a 512x512 black and white jpeg, and it stops before it completes the image. What gives?

  20. Working Link by TwilightSentry · · Score: 3, Informative

    As the Homer link doesn't seem to work for me, try: http://www.romancortes.com/blog/homer-css/

    --
    How to enable garbage collection on a system without protected memory: #define malloc() ((void *) rand())
  21. Stupid Human Trick <eom> by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I SAID, !

  22. Scales up really well by Mathinker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The big advantage of this kind of graphic is that it scales up to a nice sharp anti-aliased image as the user increases the text size. Well, at least Homer did when I tried it.

    But of course, properly implemented SVG would do that just as well. It just lacks the super-geekiness of using something in an unintended way to get a useful result. And, of course, this way might have better support in some browsers than SVG.

  23. Nothing to see here, move along by hee+gozer · · Score: 5, Informative

    It needs Verdana from MS TrueType core fonts, so it doesn't work across multiple platforms. The link is slashdotted anyway. Here's a version that's still available: http://www.romancortes.com/blog/homer-css/

    Here's how i see it: http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9183/homeraz4.png

    1. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      It needs Verdana from MS TrueType core fonts, so it doesn't work across multiple platforms.

      o.O

      It does work across multiple platforms. Any platform that supports TrueType fonts, which is more than one, hence "multiple".

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by Nicolay77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the first time I have ever seen the Homer rendered that bad.

      What ugly browser do you use?

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    3. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, many platforms do not support true type fonts. Any platform that does not support TrueType fonts, which is more than one, hence "multiple"

    4. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep looks like the guy did not do a cross platform, cross browser check .... move along

      http://hotimg10.fotki.com/p/a/91_46/240_205/duhhhhhhhh.jpg

    5. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by Kickasso · · Score: 1

      It does work across multiple platforms. The problem (for me) is that it uses Verdana, which is broken w.r.t. Unicode combining accents. It's so bad I just remove Verdana from my Linux machines (I do install MS corefonts).

    6. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by hendridm · · Score: 1

      It needs Verdana from MS TrueType core fonts, so it doesn't work across multiple platforms.
      sudo apt-get install msttcorefonts
    7. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by cerelib · · Score: 1

      The version I see is even worse than that. I am using Firefox 1.5 on RHEL 4. If someone didn't tell me the other one was George W Bush, I would have guessed it just to be some weird modern art of nobody specific.

    8. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to require a certain font because it depends on the specific (known) size of the different characters (as can be seen by the fact that it doesn't look right with another font). Verdana seems like a good choice due to the fact that everyone but you has it.

    9. Re:Nothing to see here, move along by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Here's how i see it: http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9183/homeraz4.png Ah, yes. The fabled "Groening-Picasso Acid 2.5 Font Test."

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  24. The return of RIPscript? by TheKnightShift · · Score: 1

    It's a comfort to know that when the Internet collapses, old-fashioned bulletin board systems will be ready.

  25. Front page perfection by peipas · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ahhh, posts about the Simpsons AND MacGyver on the front page at the same time. I can die now; order has been restored.

  26. zooming - change text size in browser by ayeco · · Score: 1

    Interesting. In Firefox crtl+mouse wheel or ctrl++ to zoom text, as well as css image. Page zoom is different in IE7 (it has always zoomed an entire page, text and images).

  27. Homer by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    See, you're using Web 1.0, so it's rendering Homer more like he was drawn in the early Simpsons cartoons.

  28. Web 2.0? by networkzombie · · Score: 1

    I've been doing this in Web 1.0 for years.
    http://www.dogmatix.com/dk.html

  29. But can I block it? by DJ+Manning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I fear that our advertising overlords will use this to display advertising that I'd otherwise block. The next step in fighting advertising on the web? Block all ASCII charaters from being displayed!!! That'll fix those advertisers.

    1. Re:But can I block it? by TomRK1089 · · Score: 1

      Well I for one welcome our new ASCII-advertising overlords. No, but seriously, I'd rather have passive text ads rather than Flash monstrosities. Especially those damn "You've been selected..." ones that make noise every time.

    2. Re:But can I block it? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I like the Intel ad with the cheetahs. When you wave the mouse over them they watch it with their eyes and bat it with their paws, like big kitties!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:But can I block it? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think you have strayed onto the wrong site. Maybe I can redirect you, do a google search on hollywood skinny people, that will set you right.

    4. Re:But can I block it? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You will never get laid and this is a feature in Natural Selection, not a bug.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  30. D is for dolphin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along similar lines (but not as cool), D is for dolphin.

  31. I think I know what Homer would say by Haoie · · Score: 1

    Woo hoo!!

    ASCII art is still so great, especially on forums and such where it's too much hassle [or you aren't allowed] to post images.

    --
    If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
  32. Re:works with wine? by harry666t · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's funny, how the guy trolling at the windows users didn't get modded down.

  33. SVG is dead! by chrysalis · · Score: 1

    If SVN was working in common browsers, that news would be boring.

    --
    {{.sig}}
    1. Re:SVG is dead! by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      What does SubVersion have to do with it?

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
    2. Re:SVG is dead! by chrysalis · · Score: 1

      SVG of course, stupid typo.

      --
      {{.sig}}
  34. Web 2.0 same old turd but with a new hat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the basic fact is no matter what you do to a turd - polish it, paint it, give it bling - it's still a turd, and there is nothing you can do about that underlying fact.

    C'mon people Web 2.0 is just Web 1.0, its still just scripts, images and text.

  35. How can that be Web 2.0 and Windows? by tacocat · · Score: 1

    How is it possible for something that is WEB 2.0 be only available under Windows or WINE? Seems like a contradiction in terms. I thought Web 2.0 was a new thing that was even more platform independent than ever before.

    1. Re:How can that be Web 2.0 and Windows? by Traegorn · · Score: 1

      The program to generate the images is Windows only. The code it produces is "Web 2.0"

  36. ASCII Simpsons were my usenet crazelet! by jms · · Score: 1

    It's time once again for me to bask in my fleeting moment of USENET glory, when for a few brief shining months 18 years ago, it seemed like half the world was using my Simpsons ASCII art for their signature file.

  37. #ascii by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    that is pretty sweet :-) for any ol' ascii art enthusiasts, come check out #ascii on undernet.

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  38. On the plus side.. by Junta · · Score: 1

    Many of these vendors would have just written Windows clients/apps. I too prefer native apps, but untill the consumer market is more heterogenous, the likely alternative to web apps is native apps for a platform I don't like.

    Of course, in a heterogeneous environment, the developers won't touch native clients with a teen foot pole...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  39. de_img? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get out of there, its gonna blow!

    No, I mean it, that table is xbox huge!

  40. Control-a on the Bush Picture by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you go to the edit menu in your browser and choose "select all" on the George Bush picture, he ends up looking like a Quintesson from the Transformers...which probably explains the last 7 years.

  41. Bandwidth Conservation Society by snoggeramus · · Score: 1

    That's it. I'm going to have to report this guy to the http://www.blackpearlcomputing.com/bpc/Bandwidth_stuff/default.htmlBandwidth Conservation Society.

    Now get off my lawn!

  42. Bad CSS... by Gabbermatt · · Score: 0

    You can't even see Bush's horns.

    Fix your CSS!

  43. Slashdot owes me the cost of two ibuprofen. by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My head hurts whenever I read "Web 2.0".

    Do the world a favor: smack anyone who uses the phrase "web two point oh" in a conversation. Smack them. Smack them hard.

    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    1. Re:Slashdot owes me the cost of two ibuprofen. by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Web 2.0, web 2.0, web 2.0 (sorry, I'm in a mean mood lately).

    2. Re:Slashdot owes me the cost of two ibuprofen. by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

      You're the sort of person that would offer peanut brittle to a person with a mouthful of cavities, aren't you? ;)

      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    3. Re:Slashdot owes me the cost of two ibuprofen. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Do the world a favor: smack anyone who uses the phrase "web two point oh" in a conversation. Smack them. Smack them hard.
      Is that before or after reminding them of the mantra "never use `point zero` versions of anything".
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  44. look at the javascript code on that page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that javascript is not very human-parsable ... i have absolutely NO idea of what it's doing, and frankly, that scares me.

  45. Yeah.... but... by closer2it · · Score: 1

    Does it render correctly on IE?

    Sorry, had to ask... :P

  46. If prefer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jenna Jameson.avi through aalib. That's real acii art.

  47. Web 3.141 ... by wsanders · · Score: 1

    When you get to Web 3.141, you come full circle, and it's web 1.0 again.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  48. This is what I get for using IE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage

  49. This tool is _so cool_ by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been sending goatse pics to unsuspecting web-savvy friends all morning. I haven't pulled off an unsuspecting-goatse in _years_!

    I attach them as HTML source inside text/plain MIME sections

    Nerdy friends then get annoyed at my email-incompetence, save them as .html files and pop 'em open in the browser.

    Whooo hoooo

    Now... who else can I goatse?

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  50. Priorities out of whack by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They build Homer Simpson sketching engines, but we still don't have decent business-oriented AJAX form widgets such as editable grid sheets and outline (tree) browser widgets. Building web forms is still stuck in 1982.

  51. Spelling Bee by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

    How do you spell Homer Simpson?

    oooo(OOO\L(OOOOO\L(O||\\||\\\\((8ooo((8oooo))boOoooooo)boOooooooooo///___CCO(-

    --
    I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  52. Re:works with wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is seriously one of my favorite CmdrTaco exploits. I giggle every time I read it. I don't care too much to hear about him eating shit or wanting to be repeatedly raped by large black men, but I love this one.

  53. How did Asciicam not get mentioned? by quoll · · Score: 1

    If we're discussing ASCII art, then how come the Amazing Instant Asciicam didn't get mentioned?