Slashdot Mirror


Florida Judge Smacks Down RIAA

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The RIAA is going to have to face the music in Tampa, Florida, and answer the charges of extortion, trespass, conspiracy, unlicensed investigation, and computer fraud and abuse that have been leveled against them there. And the judge delivered his ruling against them in in pretty unceremonious fashion — receiving their dismissal motion last night, and denying the motion this morning. The RIAA's unvarying M.O., when hit with counterclaims, is to make a motion to dismiss them. It did just that in one Tampa case, UMG v. Del Cid, but the judge upheld 5 of the 6 counterclaims. The RIAA quickly settled that one. When a new case came up in the same Tampa courthouse before the very same judge, and the same 5 counterclaims were leveled against the record companies, I opined that 'it is highly unlikely that the RIAA will make a motion to dismiss counterclaims,' since I knew they'd be risking sanctions if they did. Well I guess I underestimated the chutzpah — or the propensity for frivolous motion practice — of the RIAA lawyers, as they in essence thumbed their nose at the judge, making the dismissal motion anyway, telling District Judge Richard A. Lazzara that his earlier decision had been wrong. The judge wasted no time telling the record companies that he did not agree (PDF)."

51 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. Opps by Ceiynt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi. I'm the judge in this courtroom. I told your ass to get out of here once. you didn't listen. You came back with the same complaint. Guess what happens. I deny any and all settlement offers you offer to the counter-claimer. I will make it pretty damn clear this time your crap will not be welcome in this courtroom again. Prepare for contempt processes. Oh ya, I'm gonna make sure they put you in the same cell as a guy who likes to steal car steroes.

    1. Re:Opps by infonography · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...a guy who likes to steal car stereos?"

      This is the RIAA, they will have much to talk about. Maybe they will;

      a. Offer him a job.

      b. Sue him for music related violations (stereo = music = more then one user = ???? = lawsuit)

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  2. Mass mailing don't work by techpawn · · Score: 3, Funny

    The same process you use to mass mail your legal complaints can not be used to file your legal responses. This is why fellas. This case is going to get messy *grabs popcorn*

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
  3. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by DanWS6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Agreed. The RIAA should be allowed to break the law and use illegal practices to bring all those horrible copyright infringer's to swift and brutal justice. The RIAA's clients are literally losing TRILLIONS of dollars to people who are worse than terrorists. Personally I think RIAA should be able to hire mercenaries to rid the earth of such scum.

  4. I know it won't happen... by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but if there's a supreme being out there somewhere, I'll agree to start praying to it or sacrificing cans of tuna on its altar or whatever the hell it wants (within reason, of course) if only, please, please, please, there's jail sentences for the bastards at the end of this affair.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:I know it won't happen... by Adambomb · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...but if there's a supreme being out there somewhere, I'll agree to start praying to it or sacrificing cans of tuna on its altar or whatever the hell it wants I am already aware of such an entity, in its opinion.

      Too bad it just sits there purring for the most part and is fuzzy, and not so big on the implementation side.
      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    2. Re:I know it won't happen... by D+Ninja · · Score: 3, Funny

      Queue: "I'm in ur courtrooms, denying ur lawyers."
      Wish it was Caturday.

  5. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's the matter, son, the judge upheld all the counterclaims against you? If you litigate as badly as you troll, you're in deep doo-doo.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  6. Pop quiz for you litigation buffs out there by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 5, Funny

    For you litigation buffs out there, let's take a quiz.

    The facts.

    A lawyer just filed a 30-page brief in which he (a) devoted 28 pages to repeating the same arguments he had made in a motion that was decided less than 8 months earlier, and (b) devoted 3 pages to telling the judge that his previous ruling was "wrongly decided".

    Question #1

    What will happen?
    (a) The lawyer will win the motion.
    (b) The lawyer will lose the motion.
    (c) The lawyer will have to find a new line of work.
    (d) Both (b) and (c)

    Question #2

    If you are the client who pays lawyers to do things like that you are
    (a) A smart businessperson
    (b) A moron
    (c) A fool
    (d) Both (b) and (c)

    --
    Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    1. Re:Pop quiz for you litigation buffs out there by gnasher719 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot:

      Question #3: You bill your clients

      (a) a small number of hours for the three new pages
      (b) a huge number of hours for writing the same 28 pages again
      (c) cost of copying 28 pages
      (d) all of the above?

    2. Re:Pop quiz for you litigation buffs out there by Kjella · · Score: 3, Funny

      (c) cost of copying 28 pages Billing at cost? Epic fail. And you gave away three pages for free, double epic fail. This also invalidates the best answer, so it should read:

      (c) cost of copying 31 pages, if the copies had been scribed on gold leaves by tibetan monks
      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Pop quiz for you litigation buffs out there by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 3, Funny

      This one made my day.
      Thanks ! Don't thank me.

      Thank this guy. He provides me with all my best material.
      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    4. Re:Pop quiz for you litigation buffs out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's a trick question!

      The actual answer in all cases is (e).

      (e) The lawyer gets to bill an excessive amount for generating some paper work and having lunch with the judge. He then goes to his $2.4 million dollar home in his brand new BMW and sleep with his trophy wife and later on in the week sleep with his mistress.

      Lawyer's don't care if their motions are granted or not, they only care if they can bill for the time.
      You sound as if this is the case for every lawyer and have the chutzbah to say so to a lawyer with NewYorkCountryLawyer's standing in the community? Amazing.

      You realize of course that you there are many lawyers out there that might sue you over the statement demanding you produce evidence of them owning said $2.4 million dollar home, produce the "trophy wife" and mistress in court as they would like to meet the trophy wife, take her home to the $2.4 million home and in due time visit the mistress. Only thing stopping them would be the full knowledge that your attorney would, if possible, produce all in court at the same time thus informing the trophy wife of the existance of the $2.4 million dollar home and the mistress. Then offer to represent the trophy wife in divorce proceedings to get her the $2.4 million dollar home as well as half your other assets. The trophy wife would no doubt take him up on the offer then get in a lesbian affair with the mistress while the mistress sues you for palimony if applicable in your state of residence or hers if different.
    5. Re:Pop quiz for you litigation buffs out there by hairykrishna · · Score: 2, Funny

      You;re still thinking small. Where's the travel claim? Maybe if you were to hand deliver the to the monks...

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    6. Re:Pop quiz for you litigation buffs out there by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 3, Funny

      I trust argument more than I trust consensus; it's more likely to get us closer to the truth. No it isn't. Yes it is.
      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    7. Re:Pop quiz for you litigation buffs out there by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ding!

      Good day!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  7. Isn't that a reflex amongst corporate lawyers? by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems like an automated system. I think the RIAA's legal team has been replaced by a server farm.

    1. Re:Isn't that a reflex amongst corporate lawyers? by prockcore · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe the RIAA could make the claim that it wasn't them that filed the papers, but a neighbor using their unsecured wifi?

    2. Re:Isn't that a reflex amongst corporate lawyers? by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They have been using a specially modified version of Eliza to generate the motions. They had a team of lawyers file the first couple then simply started up the simulation and it is not filing all the paperwork. This is eventually going to cause a problem when they are asked where the programs law degree is from.

    3. Re:Isn't that a reflex amongst corporate lawyers? by oahazmatt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of RIAA lawyers?

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
  8. Re:Defendants not even asked! by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

    IANAT, but if that's really the definition of "frivious", my dictionary is missing a word.

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  9. Re:Defendants not even asked! by RobBebop · · Score: 4, Funny

    As Keith Olbermann reminds viewers of "Countdown" regularly, the technical definition of "insanity" is trying the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results.

    I've seen that quote attributed to Ben Franklin, but I am sure that Olbermann could have very easily been the originator.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  10. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by n+dot+l · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personally I think RIAA should be able to hire mercenaries to rid the earth of such scum. Are you kidding? Comparing them to terrorists? Mere terrorists?! You want us to use mercenaries?! Christ, next thing you'll be wanting us to liberate them from their evil P2P overlords, or reform them, or stop antagonizing them by meddling in their culture, or something.

    No, these scum are far worse than terrorists; they are a plague, an infectious disease that destroys all it touches. Unrelenting, incurable. Even the courts are at their mercy. Mercenaries are not enough, here. Entire armies are insufficient. Not even the Spanish Inquisition (which nobody expects), could handle this. No, they must be wiped out from orbit, with nukes. It's the only way to be sure.

    Signed,
    The RIAA:
    Creators of the Culture,
    Bearers of the Truth,
    Defenders of the Civilization,
    Champions of Liberty,
    Dearer than Life Itself,
    Dread Rulers of the Abyss (in a good way, we assure you),
    Awesome Enough to Have Many Many Titles,
    Your Beloved Content-Owning Overlords.
  11. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by spun · · Score: 3, Funny

    You wouldn't perchance be that certain talentless hack of a lawyer that NYCL has humiliated before, would you? Maybe you weren't cut out to be a lawyer, you know I hear KFC is hiring.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  12. Re:Pfft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I particularly liked the IP address listed. Maybe it was incomplete to "protect" her online identity. ...

    Plaintiffsâ(TM) agent, MediaSentry, Inc., determined that the individual used Internet Protocol (âoeIPâ) address 131.247.210 to connect to the Internet.

  13. Re:Defendants not even asked! by QMO · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . .trying the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results That's also a very close approximation of the definition of chaos theory.
    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  14. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by Mr+Abstracto · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why does a deaf guy need headphones?

  15. Re:Defendants not even asked! by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Software Debugging - Where doing the same thing over and over gives you different answers. Leading cause of insanity.

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  16. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    from your local friend of thieves always peddling his dubious services here at slashdot, where the people who make the movies we watch are scum, and the people who think the world owes them a living a welcome Epic punctuation/grammar fail.

  17. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    You missed the update. The RIAA and poor recording artists are losing Quadrillions of dollars a second. In fact it's so bad that bands are now resorting to cannibalism. Metallica Ate DEO's drummer and bass guitarist. and Nobody has seen Robert Palmer for a few weeks.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  18. Re:Pfft... by Nullav · · Score: 4, Funny

    131.247.210.* - Guilty by association!

    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  19. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by Eudial · · Score: 3, Funny

    You wouldn't steal a handbag!
    You wouldn't steal a car!
    You wouldn't steal a baby!
    You wouldn't shoot a policeman, and then steal his helmet!
    You wouldn't go to the toilet in his helmet, and send it to the policeman's grieving widow, and then steal it again!

    The IT crowd is funneh

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  20. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the words of the great philosopher, "Nuke 'em till they glow. Then shoot 'em in the dark."
    Words to live by.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  21. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by DJProtoss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Metallica Ate DEO's drummer and bass guitarist. and Nobody has seen Robert Palmer for a few weeks. You make these sound like bad things
    --
    "Success is based on knowing how far to go in going too far"
  22. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by Aranykai · · Score: 4, Funny

    My mom always called that "selective hearing". Apparently, all the men in the family suffer from it severely.

    --
    If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
  23. Re:In the End, It Doesn't Matter by dargon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please don't give them any more lousy ideas, they come up with enough of them on their own, they don't need your help.

  24. Re:In the End, It Doesn't Matter by marxmarv · · Score: 2, Funny

    And who is going to do the actual "seizing" of the equipment? Feds? Local gendarmes? (I can imagine that will go over big in some jurisdictions.....devoting time and manpower to seizing some geek's equipment for sharing music...)

    If the Miller case in Arizona is any guide, I imagine they'll just order you to bring your data in for imaging. An enabled secure delete facility may require some explanation, lest it be construed as destruction of evidence.

    Your sig wins, by the way.
    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
  25. Re:I'm curious by lord+sibn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, but they are lawyers. By definition, they not only deserve it, they have *earned* it. ;)

  26. Re:Not unsual at all. by man_ls · · Score: 2, Funny

    He means your posts exude smug epicaricacy. I don't necessarily agree, but that's the gist of it.

  27. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given that Gwynne died in 1993, I'd guess he wasn't immortal.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  28. Re:Not unsual at all. by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 4, Funny

    He means your posts exude smug epicaricacy. I don't necessarily agree, but that's the gist of it. Thanks for the clarification. I don't know why he couldn't say it in plain English like you did.

    Well if I'm accused of feeling pleasure over the RIAA's misfortune, I am guilty as charged.
    --
    Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
  29. Re:I'm curious by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or perhaps, now that he's given them some more rope, he's sitting back quietly while the RIAA's lawyers continue to demonstrate a pattern of abuse of process, in case they come up with some clearer examples.

    I would kiss a goat, full on the lips, just to watch the RIAA be found to be a vexatious litigant! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vexatious_litigation or just google it.

  30. Re:Defendants not even asked! by Artifakt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm perfectly trasmodic with antipipulation over 'frivious' myself. For a definition, how about "Frivious (Adj.): Any condition both frivolous and trivial.". Since those two words already have substantial but not complete overlap, frivious is very useful for excluding the borderline cases. Now if we just had a word, as the Germans do, for the overlap between sarcasm and irony. (Harlanellisonkeit).

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  31. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by Gewalt · · Score: 3, Funny

    It takes years of training to master that skill.

    --
    Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
  32. Re:Defendants not even asked! by mrbcs · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/26032.html Einstein... should've guessed that one ;-)

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  33. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, there can be only one.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  34. Oh, come on by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Frivious" is a perfectly cromulent word!

  35. Re:More pro-piracy bullshit by neomunk · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, but Keith Richards had his corpse on display, someone ganked it in the fray.

  36. Re:Oops by Eivind · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's hardly a smart move to annoy the judge. This is a pretty accurately aimed footbullet.

  37. Re:Oops by MacWiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hardly a smart move" could be the RIAA's secret motto.

  38. Re:I'm curious by JosKarith · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What they did here was flagrantly incompetent. This surprises you? ;)" Yeah - I expected them to be fragrantly incontinent. Talk about taking the pi55...

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'