Slashdot Mirror


A Virtualized Linux System For Windows

getupstandup1 writes "Ulteo today unveiled their Virtual Desktop (screenshots, download) which is a free, full Linux desktop that runs seamlessly on Windows. It's interesting because it's not running under Xen or VMWare, but instead uses the coLinux patch, which they claim allows the system to achieve 'great performance, close to a native installation on the PC.' No need to reboot the system anymore to switch from Windows to Linux." We discussed Ulteo when the Ubuntu-derived distro was announced a year back.

280 comments

  1. As opposed to... andLinux? by Briareos · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is it just me, or did this already exist? Doesn't sound that new to me...

    np: Saul Williams - Grippo (Saul Williams)

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    1. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, Ulteo is kde, andLinux is gnome. Otherwise identical.

    3. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll vouch for the underpinnings of andLinux and Ulteo, which is coLinux. I've been using it for years (an Ubuntu distro) and it's extremely solid, reliable, and efficient. It's a great way to have your Linux dev world near at hand, while needing a Windows box for other reasons. (In fact, I run my home PBX smoothly in a coLinux service on an XP PVR box.)

      I hear so little about coLinux, I feel like it's one of Linux's best kept secrets. It's cool that we're starting to see meta-distributions based upon it.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    4. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by rdradar · · Score: 1

      anyone finds the default password for Ulteo? It didnt ask any on setup.

    5. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by kesuki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Is it just me, or did this already exist [andlinux.org]? Doesn't sound that new to me.."

      What worries me, is this runs in 'system managment mode' sounds like colinux is a perfect system to design a 'stealth' rootkit around...

      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/11/2044216&from=rss

      great just great, as if paid hackers needed any help designing and deploying system managment mode rootkits, with colinux they can put a full LAMP server on somone's windows box and they'd never notice, except that their bandwidth and memory keep getting used up...

    6. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      great just great, as if paid hackers needed any help designing and deploying system managment mode rootkits, with colinux they can put a full LAMP server on somone's windows box and they'd never notice, except that their bandwidth and memory keep getting used up...

      It might be better though. With a LAMP server it is traceable, which would make it much easier to take down then say Storm which uses P2P for communication.
      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    7. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by redxxx · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe you may have that backwards. I run andLinux, cause it is useful for certain stuff and I can't just run linux, and it is KDE. There is another xcf or something version.

      KDE in windows is going to be the better bet down the road for a lot of stuff, because you have to leap through fewer hoops with the filesystem, at least as far as most applications are concerned.

      It's kinda amazing being able to get an awful lot of stuff just running apt-get from a terminal, while inside XP. A real VM is far secure of course. Security decent hardware firewalls and no small amount of obscurity doesn't bother me too horible.

    8. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by hedwards · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's kinda amazing being able to get an awful lot of stuff just running apt-get from a terminal, while inside XP. A real VM is far secure of course. Security decent hardware firewalls and no small amount of obscurity doesn't bother me too horible. I was trying to figure out what the point of this really is.

      Running Win apps on Linux is because there isn't a replacement for it or one that interoperates. Running Linux in a VM on Windows is good for things like security, but running Linux apps on Win just because, seems like an odd choice to me. Especially since one can get OO.org for Win, Firefox for win, Thunderbird for win, Gimp for win etc. Ok, so the last one is kind of cludgy. (Or it was last time I checked a few years ago, I'm sure it's much less so now)

      There probably are a few which don't have Win versions, but VMs can be had for free, if you're a home or non-commercial user.
    9. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Windows programs aren't that great. It would be nice to be able to run Gnome when I'm forced to use Windows though (for things like Illustrator).

    10. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear so little about coLinux, I feel like it's one of Linux's best kept secrets.

      I have often thought the same thing. I saw a discussion here on /. once about it and looked at the site and went "WTF?!" I have made the switch to linux, so I havn't taken the time to try it out, but it looks fairly stable and usable.

      I guess it makes sense, most people don't have much need to run linux apps on windows...the usual gains(stability, whatever, apps? ha!) isn't there. I saw another comment...running this on a windows-bound corporate computer would make a lot sense if you are used to certain GNU apps and are forced to Windows..

    11. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some of us who use Windows are ex-Unix/BSD/Linux users, and miss some Unix software. There is of course CygWin, but it's awful, and VMs tend to be too resource hungry on systems like laptops. There's also Microsoft's Unix subsystem, but it's not widely used, so not widely supported.

      I haven't tried this (or any other coLinux derivative), but it sounds interesting, especially if it's able to run on a laptop without draining the battery. I'd like to be able to run some of the software (mostly command-line) that I miss from my pre-Windows days (i.e. my pre-university days, since I'm not studying anything related to computing), but using Linux alone is a complete non-starter, for various reasons, including missing features compared to Windows, lack of hardware support, lack of good power management on a lot of hardware, lack of support for applications I need to use, etc.

    12. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      If you can get a mythtv front end working this way with an acceptable frame rate for video playback, I'd definitely be interested.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    13. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      with an acceptable frame rate for video playback On what sort of hardware? 1080p or standard definition? It makes a huge difference, you know...
    14. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you noticed any stability problems or issues with drivers and power management? I'd really like to have Linux running under Windows (Vista) on my laptop, but my hardware is pretty new, so I'm not sure about the Linux support for it, and I don't know how coLinux/andLinux handles this sort of thing. Last time I tried running Linux (Gentoo on the bare metal), there were a lot of problems getting certain hardware to work, getting standby to work, getting decent battery life, etc. As long as coLinux doesn't interfere with the power management, though, I wouldn't mind having to access the network through Windows (e.g. via an OpenSSH tunnel) or something.

    15. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Right now I'd settle for *anything* playable that doesn't chew 100% on my windows desktop with a AMD 3500+ CPU.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    16. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by DaitanGio · · Score: 1

      What are the differences between coLinux and andlinux.org?
      I'd like to switch from vmware to this solution for my pc used at work... is it worth to?
      Thank you!

      --
      -- Giovanni Daitan Giorgi http://gioorgi.com http://www.siforge.org
    17. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by ranulf · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've been using andLinux for some weeks now and it's integration with Windows is very good indeed.

    18. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by andrikos · · Score: 4, Funny

      OO.org for Win, Firefox for win, Thunderbird for win, Gimp for win etc Did you mean OO FTW, Firefox FTW, Thunderbird FTW, Gimp FTW, etc?
    19. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      The only reason I installed andLinux-KDE was to use Kile Latex editor (as I do not like any of the Windows editor such as WinEDT or Tecnixcenter, etc). I tried to use sshfs/fuse too but unfortunately I believe the ssh modules or fuse modlues have not been ported yet.

      I agree that people doing this kind of linux to windows ports should focus on applications that are *not* available in Windows (both user applications like Kile or low end stuff like fuse functionality). Instead of Firefox, OpenOffice, GIMP and all that stuff that you can easily install and run in windows natively.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    20. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by loftyhauser · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm an engineer/professor, and I teach computational fluid dynamics. I develop, test and run numerical simulations on UNIX systems, but I require a Windows system (for applications, mostly). I've found that andLinux is great for developing the applications on my Windows system. I tend to use command line tools, mostly, which are a pain in the MS world. Have you ever tried building a UNIX makefile code on Windows? And cygwin just doesn't cut it (OpenMPI doesn't work).

    21. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by nickos · · Score: 3, Informative

      coLinux is a version of the Linux kernel that can run as a task under Windows. andLinux is a distro which uses coLinux and runs on Windows.

    22. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me its not "just because" - For me, the reason is that some idiot very high up in the stratosphere of my organisation have decided that I must use Windows for political /"strategic" reasons, even though I maintain Solaris and Linux servers.
      I would kill to get gnome-terminal or *any* decent terminal (must have tabs) to run on my WinXP machine.

      Unfortunately, I couldn't get Virtual Desktop to run successfully after the install.

      Jesus.. all I want is a fecking gnome-terminal that installs *easily*. I've tried cygwin (couldnt find gnome-terminal in their packages) and Virtual Desktop - no success yet.
      Suggestions anyone?

    23. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Talking about security, let's use the most unsecure system out there to host a very secure os....hence give the illusion of security to any of the people wanting to learn to use linux ...
      ANDDDDDD because they hear from *nix geeks everywhere, that there are practically no viruses for linux, they will think "Hey i dont need an anti virus for windows anymore cuz I am using linux now"

      Atleast with VMWare they needed to be extra smart to have a blue pill that runs in the astral part of the RAM, now, they will only need a few scripts, and a few kids!!!

      "The most unholy of unions!"

      ps- for the nix newbies "if you run nix on windows, you ain't running nix!"

    24. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If you have a good network connection to a *nix box you could always run an X server on your windows box and then run gnome-terminal using remote X.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    25. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      quite some adaptation would be needed, while the core of colinux runs in kernel mode many of the management functions (such as actually making it run) and communication functions are controlled by user mode daemons which are as visible as any other process. CPU time used by colinux ends up attributed to the colinux-daemon process, not sure about memory.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    26. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      found by trial and error username:password
      me:me
      root:root

    27. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

      Yea I hear you hedwards. Apart from programmers who would probably use a full VM program anyway I don't see the use of this "application." Windows on Linux is useful for obvious reasons, there are things Windows can do that Linux can't (for various reasons) but there's nothing Linux can do that Windows can't.

    28. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by lutz7755 · · Score: 1


      why wouldn't you just run secureCRT? I mean, I like the linux desktop as much as the next slashdotter. But if I'm forced into a windows machine at work (I am) just run a windows terminal. It works fine, has tabs, fowards X, all that stuff.

      On yeah, and get Console2 to replace the normal command console that windows has (OMG - resizable windows!?). And there are a number of GNU tools compiled under windows to run a shell (bash, vi, ssh, grep, awk, etc etc)

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/

      http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/
      (they're old, but they work)

      http://win-bash.sourceforge.net/
      (also old, but works)

      I've combined all three to get a useful windows machine.

    29. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was trying to figure out what the point of this really is. Embedded development. Being able to download Crosstool compile the ARM linux kernel and modules etc. whilst at work, under windows is... fantastic.
    30. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your a developer it's great. Cygwin only goes so far.

    31. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Running Linux in a VM on Windows is good for things like security

      For... security of your Windows machine? So that in case a virus attacks your Linux machine it won't get out? Uh...

      Especially since one can get OO.org for Win, Firefox for win, Thunderbird for win, Gimp for win etc.

      So by that logic, you should never need to switch from Windows to Linux, right?

    32. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      why wouldn't you just run secureCRT? I mean, I like the linux desktop as much as the next slashdotter. But if I'm forced into a windows machine at work (I am) just run a windows terminal. It works fine, has tabs, fowards X, all that stuff.

      I'll second that emotion.

      SecureCRT is a godsend for windows users. With it, plus unixutils and xming I have nearly all the tools I need to admin several tens of unix servers from my workstation.

      I have no reason to change to Linux. I did try, but I missed secureCRT session manager and rdesktop was (is?) still a bit flakey for my taste (specially remote clipboard sharing) and since I also admin several windows servers, I need to be able to log on to domains and use mmc snap-ins (do they work under wine?)

      There are several reason to choose an open source OS, but lack of alternatives on windows is hardly one of them.

      --
      No sig
    33. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by zerkon · · Score: 1

      I use MythTv Player on my windows boxen... Works decently

    34. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by mdu · · Score: 1

      I don't see Ulteo as being near as flexible as andLinux. andLinux lets you run apt-get (or aptitude, etc.) to install any other Ubuntu packages you want. Ulteo only has a subset of applications that they allow. From the Ulteo FAQ:

      Q: Can I install extra software onto the virtual linux Desktop, or am I only able to use the bundled applications? If so, how?

      A: You can already benefit from many other apps by going to the panel, select "Desktop apps" or "Games", and switch to "Edge" mode in "other settings". This will add a 2GB compressed layer with many apps that you can choose from "All apps" in the panel. It will take a little time to download though, and once done you have to restart the VD.

      There's more to the FAQ such as warnings to not use too many other packages because it will break future upgrades due to the way they built the system.

    35. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      I need to use Windows for various reasons. However, I also want a powerful commandline, and I'm used to many of the GNU and Linux tools. It's hard to beat any of these:

      rsync -avz ~/src/application app1.example.com:
      ls --color
      wget --spider www.example.com
      vi foo
      for host in HOST1 HOST2 HOST3 DB1 DB5; do ssh $HOST 'cat /etc/issue'; done
      ssh -X host.corp.example.com /usr/bin/some-Xwindow-application

      Sure, some applications already exist on Windows, but many of these do not.

      Since I'm running all these commands, why not take it a step further and organize my workspace with a bunch of terminal windows using term or rxvt (Much better then the default Cygwin window).

      I've been using Cygwin for these tasks for years, but Cygwin is buggy and not always up to date. I'd love a little more competition in this area.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    36. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, I still have no use for an OS that can't run Windows programs.

    37. Re:As opposed to... andLinux? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      There's also Microsoft's Unix subsystem, but it's not widely used, so not widely supported.

      And honestly, when was the last time Microsoft released an update for this software? It was released in early 2004 and never seemed to get another update from what I could tell.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  2. No 3d acceleration by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, unfortunately the video output is as snappy as VNC or VMWare. Virtualize the 3d graphics driver already.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:No 3d acceleration by JamieKitson · · Score: 0

      Yeah, let's try getting wine up and running.

  3. I Spend Three Weeks.. by Bryansix · · Score: 0

    Getting Ubuntu to work with Virtual PC 2007 and NOW they tell me?! Geez. Although it IS typical with Slashdot.

    1. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Took me 30 minutes with VirtualBox, sounds like an issue with your choice of virtualisation software not linux.

    2. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by mwolfe38 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure which is worse, trying to get ubuntu installed through virtual pc or relying on slashdot for all of your technology advice.

    3. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Ya, I spent a week trying to compile Virtual Box too. If I was at home I would use the non-free version which is compiled already but this is at work so I needed the GNU version. Eventually I gave up on VirtualBox.

    4. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by secolactico · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. Everybody knows that we come to slashdot for legal and romantic advice.

      --
      No sig
    5. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Well it works now. Plus I didn't reply on Slashdot. I researched this well enough. I WAS going to use VirtualBox but I couldn't get it to compile. Dependency hell consumed me.

    6. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by mwolfe38 · · Score: 1

      Hint, try wikiepdia. To narrow that list down a bit, try virtualbox, qemu, vmware server (or workstation if you are willing to pay) Currently I'm using virtualbox, but I had used vmware server for a year or two and liked it a lot. However, Virtualbox is easier to install/update on my ubuntu host since it has premade deb packages for ubuntu. Also, virtualbox seems to be about as fast as vmware and it has seemeless mode (check youtube if you don't know what that is)

    7. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Three weeks? It took me three seconds to find this article using Google... three weeks ago!

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    8. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Don't give up. VirtualBox is DEFINITELY worth it. I run Windows on it and everything works except videogames (that's what Wine is for ;-) )

      Here's an installation guide for Ubuntu, they tell you how to compile from sources.

      http://www.howtoforge.com/virtualbox_ubuntu

    9. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Oops, you meant compiling on windows? ^^; I understand you man.

    10. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you brought it up.
      There is this girl. She is hot.

      I like her, she doesn't know I exist.
      I want her, but I am an anonymous coward. How should I proceed to subpoena her for a date?

    11. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      go to doctor and have your subpoena replaced by a normal sized poena.

    12. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Though, not necessarily in that order...

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    13. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up! Restraint orders are just another way to say "I love you".

    14. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by play_in_traffic · · Score: 1

      Just boot up another virtual girl friend and go on a virtual date. -P-i-T

    15. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Anonymous Coward wants first post, he takes first post

      When Anonymous Coward wants a troll mod, he takes the troll mod

      When Anonymous Coward wants a woman, he takes the woman. Why don't you just take her?

    16. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. If you are running Ubuntu, they have the GPL'd version in their repos. If you have any type of Debian-based system it might work and you could always try alien if you have an RPM based system. If you are using Gentoo.... You should be used to compiles that take a week or more :)

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    17. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Indeed. Everybody knows that we come to slashdot for legal and romantic advice."

      If I took that advice I'd be pounding my pud in prison...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    18. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that drove me nuts too, I though Ubuntu was a piece of shit but it turns out Virtual PC was the problem.

      Try http://virtualbox.org/, it works much better.

    19. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Either way the whole idea is nucking futs. Why would your bother to try a run a more secure and stable OS on top of an unsecure and unstable 'Work In Progress' (P)OS. Now I can understand wanting to access the windows OS from Linux to play computer games because of the number of titles available and that way your work and internet connections are kept secure from the vagaries of what is basically a games console but why the hell would you try to conduct important work and financial activities as an extension to a windows PC game console. Talk about trying build multi storey structures upon foundations of jello ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by harry666t · · Score: 1

      > 100% Overrated

      How can a post be "overrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?

    21. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Yes, but even with that information it WOULD NOT RUN on my machine. I had to go back to Gusty Gibbon and get THAT to run. Then I had to update. Factor in some wasted time trying to get Virtual Box to run and the fact that I'm at work and have other things to do and you get three weeks.

    22. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm at work. I support a Microsoft environment. I don't like it but that's what I do. So That's what I have to run.

    23. Re:I Spend Three Weeks.. by sporkme · · Score: 1

      Was it score 1, overrated? Score 0, overrated?
      1. mod+1 [positive adjective]
      2. mod-1 overrated -> should read score 1, overrated
      3. mod-1 overrated again -> should definitely read score 0, overrated
      4. ???
      5. profit
      You must be new here, moderation serves no purpose whatsoever but to make the poster feel gratified and to make me^W the moderator feel powerful.

  4. Now, more masculine! by Champ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm going to have to look into their "application balls" -- the applications I have now are all effete and neutered.

    1. Re:Now, more masculine! by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their application balls just don't appeal to me. Personally, their system tray vagina sounds like something I'd prefer, even if it's not all that pretty.

    2. Re:Now, more masculine! by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 4, Funny

      That sir, is the most disturbing thing I've heard today. My hat is off to you.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Now, more masculine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to have to look into their "application balls" -- the applications I have now are all effete and neutered.

      Their application balls just don't appeal to me. Personally, their system tray vagina sounds like something I'd prefer, even if it's not all that pretty.
      That sir, is the most disturbing thing I've heard today. My hat is off to you.

      Tough act to follow, but my first thought (after I'd recovered the errant coffee all over my moneitor) was:

      "But it's virtualized, so isn't it more like a system tray fleshlight than a system tray vagina?"

      I'm not sure what's more disturbing. The thought itself, or the fact that I actually thought that. Oh well. Might as well share my pain with the rest of y'all.

    4. Re:Now, more masculine! by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

      Your reply is perfectly cromulent

    5. Re:Now, more masculine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their application balls just don't appeal to me. Personally, their system tray vagina sounds like something I'd prefer, even if it's not all that pretty. Damn!!!!!! that was the funniest thing I've seen all week.

      Thanx :)
  5. Sweet by DanWS6 · · Score: 2

    What games does this let me play?

    1. Re:Sweet by DanWS6 · · Score: 1

      nevermind.. I see it's a desktop and not an os running under vmware. I should learn to read.

    2. Re:Sweet by maxume · · Score: 1

      I thought you were making a joke about all the great linux games that could be run on Windows using this software.

      (there is OS virtualization going on though http://www.ulteo.com/home/en/virtualdesktop?autolang=en )

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Sweet by DanWS6 · · Score: 1

      I was making a joke about the lack of games on linux. That's the one main thing that keeps me from switching to linux. I'm afraid that one day I'll just have to buy a console and give up PC gaming so I don't have to deal with Microsoft anymore.

    4. Re:Sweet by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      Irony would dictate that you consider the options and elect to buy an Xbox 360.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Sweet by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Informative
      As a primarily Linux user, I'm more than happy to help people getting to grips with it if they choose to give Linux a try - but likewise I respect anyone who gives good reasons why Linux is not for them.

      But can we please stop with the "I won't run Linux because of lack of games" statements because they are meaningless.

      Firstly, nothing stops you dual-booting both Linux and Windows in order to understand some of the benefits Linux could potentially bring to you.

      Secondly, the fact that there are so few modern games on Linux is not a fault of Linux itself. Yep, maybe it's because the Linux user base is much smaller than Windows and/or maybe it's because we Linux users are spoilt by getting so much software for free that we've forgotten how to pay for games, both are acceptable reasons to justify the fact that games companies won't port games to it. After all, games companies are businesses and if they see a way to make money, then they will do it.

      Thirdly, if you're into modern graphics intensive games then, yes, it's probably a bad idea to use Linux. But software like DOSBox, Wine, countless platform emulators & Open Source games means that there is actually a *HUGE* catalogue of games you can play perfectly on Linux. Yes, that catalogue probably won't include Call Of Duty 4 but as you start going through the back catalogue of games, the further you go back the more ways you will find to play them on Linux.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    6. Re:Sweet by DanWS6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have two boxes. One runs XP which I use for gaming and web surfing, the other runs Gentoo which I use for development as well as a media box/file server. Right now both machines are in the same room so I sometimes use the GUI on the linux box but no KVM and one monitor/keyboard/mouse is a pain. That wouldn't be such an issue if DVI KVM's weren't so insanely expensive.

      Firstly, nothing stops you dual-booting both Linux and Windows in order to understand some of the benefits Linux could potentially bring to you. Yes there is, I have no desire to dual boot. I don't want to do and thus I choose not to, just like I choose not to give up my XP box because I choose to be able to play games.

      But can we please stop with the "I won't run Linux because of lack of games" statements because they are meaningless." I'll stop with that statement just as soon as I can load up Crysis, TF2, HL2, etc and get the same if not better performance as running them under XP (but not vista because that's just too easy). =D Believe me if NVidia opened up their drivers and game developers started releasing linux binaries for major games I'd have no problem switching over to linux only.
    7. Re:sweet by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I cant wait for WINE to support it.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    8. Re:Sweet by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Yes there is, I have no desire to dual boot. I don't want to do and thus I choose not to, just like I choose not to give up my XP box because I choose to be able to play games.

      To be honest, it's precisely what I do - I'm also a Gentoo person with an XP box for gaming and a few "must have" applications. So it doesn't bother me too much that I can't run modern games on Linux because I have an XP installation.

      Yep, it's a bind having to keep two OSes up to date, I agree but to me it's no biggie.

      Believe me if NVidia opened up their drivers and game developers started releasing linux binaries for major games I'd have no problem switching over to linux only.

      Well, I have four PCs at home, all of them running XP, Gentoo or dual-booting both and I am paying for my stupidity now in having put ATI Radeon cards in three of those machines about a year ago and now deciding I want to game on Linux a lot more. None of the machines are high spec particularly but I've just ordered two of the three nVidia 7600GT cards I intend to buy as replacements for the ATIs because of the ultra-crap drivers ATI keeps churning out for Linux. So whilst neither nVidia or ATI has open sourced their drivers, nVidia has done a whole lot more for Linux gaming already by keeping their Windows and Linux drivers pretty much in sync.

      Anyway, it's not just about open source drivers - what about DirectX? To me, that's a bigger factor in restricting gaming on Linux.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    9. Re:Sweet by DanWS6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If those knuckleheads ever finalized the OpenGL3 spec it might get more love from game developers and thus make it easier for games to be ported to linux.

    10. Re:Sweet by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Yes, it would make it easier - but would the game companies actually do it?

      After all, most of them have been creating games in DirectX for 95% of the world's PCs for years - would they really go to the trouble of changing to OpenGL just to get a few more PCs and piss Microsoft off?

      I don't like it any more than you do - but I'm being the pragmatist here! :-)

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    11. Re:Sweet by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      The problem i had when i kept trying to switch to linux (1998-2000) was that i was dual booting with windows to play games. whenever i had a problem in linux and couldnt fix it within a day or so, i would simply go back to windows, or if i booted into windows to play tribes (which was often) then i simply wouldnt leave and ended up deleting my linux partition because i never used it.

      what made me finally switch to linux (2000) was when i learned from a friend that tribes ran in linux under wine. i blew away windows and was determined to get linux to work. problems like X not working needed to be fixed, as i was a college student and i needed to type papers. i had to figure out internet, sound, and all kinds of crap to make it usable for school and tribes (and later tribes 2). because i didnt have windows to fall back on any more, i was forced to understand.

      dual booting is not the way to switch to linux (imo). linux and windows are different, people need to embrace the differences and make a choice. who wants to reboot to play a game, reboot again to look at the internet and chat? i dont think many people do, and its easier to just use windows than jump back and forth.

      things are a HELL of a lot easier now than in 2000, and of course a hell of a lot easier in 2000 than in 99, etc... a LOT more stuff will run in wine and similar apps now than before. the gaming argument is certainly valid, but its getting thinner.

    12. Re:Sweet by eldepeche · · Score: 1

      I bought a Radeon X800 for my new computer because it was the second-highest-performing video card with Free drivers. (The X850 cost way way more.) With every distro I've tried, I need to make at most one xorg.conf tweak, and all the games based on the Q3 engine work perfectly. I've never even tried the non-free drivers just because everyone complains about them constantly.

    13. Re:Sweet by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      I dunno. I don't run Linux because I can't effortlessly run my games on it. I don't wish to dual-boot an OS, and Linux, for me, has no advantage whatsoever over Windows. I don't really see how "can't run games" isn't a valid reason.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    14. Re:Sweet by BrentH · · Score: 1

      That's the whole point isn't it: Q3-based games... As in, games of at least 4 years old... Gamers do not even want Q4 anymore, and even UT3 seems to be a passed station. Every 3-6 months there's a new game in town that gamers /have/ to play. /That's/ gaming in the sense that most use it, not being a diehard Q3-fan playing on 640x480 because then you can bunnyhop faster.

    15. Re:Sweet by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      I think that dual booting does give people time to adjust to Linux, secure in the knowledge that if they need to do something quickly while they figure out Linux, they can boot Windows and just do what they need to.

      But otherwise I agree with you - just being bloody-minded about it and forcing yourself to ***MAKE IT WORK*** under Linux is a great learning curve if nothing else.

      From my perspective, I'm going off the whole PC games scene anyway. I'm in my 40s, been an avid gamer for 20+ years and, as such, I've a heap of classic favourite games that I keep going back to like Doom, Quake and Civilization anyway - so with the exception of Half-Life 2 and Galactic Civilizations 2 expansions, I just don't buy any other PC games any more.

      Most of the old stuff runs happily in Linux so I'm happy also - though I fully accept that modern games are a reason some gamers will probably never try Linux.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    16. Re:Sweet by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      To be honest, the "last straw" for me was not discovering that there's an incompatibility with the latest ATI drivers and the latest 2.6.25 Linux kernel.

      Sure, maybe give ATI some more time to fix the problem - but then again, my old nVidia 6200 board has had better frame rates under Linux than my newer ATI X1950 Pro board (when the ATI drivers don't crash my X-Server) for over a year now - so I'm not holding my breath for ATI to fix anything soon.

      Yes, the free ATI drivers work okay for 2D and desktop but I've never done much else with them because I'd always read that they couldn't do a lot with 3D - maybe I'm wrong...

      But at the same time, the nVidia card in Linux just works - installing the nVidia drivers is never a problem, the kernel version never seems to be that much of an issue and one or two occasional changes in xorg.conf is no biggie.

      Nope, it's "bye bye ATI" for me - they're being swapped out for nVidia 7600GT boards now and the ATIs can go on eBay.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    17. Re:sweet by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Do you know if wine supports Ulteo Virtual desktop yet?

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    18. Re:Sweet by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I think that dual booting does give people time to adjust to Linux, secure in the knowledge that if they need to do something quickly while they figure out Linux, they can boot Windows and just do what they need to.
      I think that dual booting is a poor choice for your main machine. At least if you are anything like me you will frequently have a lot of stuff open which you really don't want to have to close to reboot into another OS. So the linux install will probablly end up forgotten unless there are some important things you need the machine for that can only be done in linux.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    19. Re:Sweet by eldepeche · · Score: 1

      So run Windows. All I meant is that there do exist well-supported video cards in Linux-land, and you can use them to play native games (not in Wine) with great performance. The GGP was talking about Linux gaming, and for the games that are actually supported on Linux platforms, the Radeon X8?0 works well.

  6. Near native performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's interesting because it's not running under Xen or VMWare, but instead uses the coLinux patch, which they claim allows the system to achieve 'great performance, close to a native installation on the PC.' Doesn't VMWare (and most modern virtualization programs for that matter) run near native already? All the new major processors have the virtualization extensions built in. (I didn't mention Xen because it doesn't run on Windows)

    In fact, wiki has a list. Look under the "Guest OS speed relative to Host OS" column: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_virtual_machines#More_Details

    Most are native or near native.
    1. Re:Near native performance by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't VMWare (and most modern virtualization programs for that matter) run near native already?

      Yes, But I think that this doesn't virtualize the entire OS just a part of it which would make it run faster.
      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Near native performance by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Here's my understanding of how it works:

      Virtualized code can run and access memory when in the userspace ring exactly like native code. The kernel ring takes some hacking, and when you run on top of another OS, access to disk will have to go through the other OS, which slows things down somewhat.

      So yes and no: some things happen at native speeds, some are slowed down. What does this mean for the performance of your favorite application? That depends on what it does. Editing and saving code in emacs should be non-noticably slower. A good candidate for major slowdown is databases, since they tend to hammer the disk pretty hard.

    3. Re:Near native performance by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      In theory yes, in practice colinux beats vmware in some areas but loses out in others (the disk and network code seem to be particular bottlenecks). And colinux has no native GUI system so you have to use the network to run your GUI.

      IMO the free (as in beer) versions of vmware have removed most of the reason to use colinux.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Near native performance by MarkVVV · · Score: 1

      VMware still uses it's binary translator. It doesn't leverage VT (or AMD-V) yet, because it claims it's slower than the software binary translator. Ps.: They only use VT for Intel 64-bit CPU's when running a 64bit guest os.

  7. But... by Kingrames · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it have native support for wine?

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    1. Re:But... by HappySmileMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope so, Firefox now works great in Wine, so I can run Firefox in Wine, on Linux, on Windows, and if I have that copy of windows running in a virtual machine on my MacBook I'll be a god.

    2. Re:But... by mwolfe38 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thats not bad, but I prefer doing all of my work on the command line in a cygwin instance of windows xp guest on an ubuntu host running windows hyper v through wine.

    3. Re:But... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      A god...with no dates. What good is that?

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    4. Re:But... by Joebert · · Score: 1

      At least untill your battery dies 5 minutes later.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    5. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something way wrong with our moderation system here if a reply like that to the topic of "Virtualized Linux System for WINDOWS" is modded as insightful rather than funny. Give me a break! This is insightful; that was funny.

    6. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot. None of us have dates.

    7. Re:But... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      well it doesn't have built in GUI support so you would have to use networked X or XVNC or similar.

      other than that I would imagine wine would run just fine.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope so, Firefox now works great in Wine, so I can run Firefox in Wine, on Linux, on Windows, and if I have that copy of windows running in a virtual machine on my MacBook I'll be a god. Good god. I'm going to have to try that when I get home. :)
  8. Re:Just wondering by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linuces. The 'x' is only the nominative singular form, for everything else you use c + ending.

  9. Other way around, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all in favor of any projects like this that ease the transition from Windows to Linux. But I do wish it was the other way around: I want to run Windows safely inside a sandbox inside Linux.

    If you are surfing the web from inside your virtual Linux, you are using the Windows networking stack. This will be more secure than using IE under Windows, but it's still using the Windows networking stack. I'd feel better if it was the Linux networking stack trying to fend off the various attacks your system can suffer from the Internet.

    1. Re:Other way around, please by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think this will happen in as much depth as you are hoping. While Linux is 100% free and open source, it makes porting it to a proprietary OS easier then doing the reverse. WGA and other things don't help.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Other way around, please by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      This is why there's a ReactOS project. In a month or so they'll have version 0.3.5 running.

    3. Re:Other way around, please by Petaris · · Score: 1

      I want to run Windows safely inside a sandbox inside Linux. Why not just run it in VMware, Xen, or //s then? If you want to sandbox it anyway then you may as well. And now there is cool stuff like VMware's Unity for Linux (VMware Fusion for Mac has had this for a while and its nice, though I don't use it often) which lets you make the apps look like they are running without the virtual machine.

      Just a thought,
      --
      ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
    4. Re:Other way around, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed -- basically your only choice is to rewrite the entire Windows code base, using open source licensing, so that it can run within Linux (that is, the Wine and ReactOS projects!)

      True, Wine isn't exactly the same thing as coLinux, but I can imagine a project such as coReactos which would aim to do run a Win32-compatible kernel on top of Linux... though you're probably better off just using emulation at that point.

  10. Can it use your 3d card? stuff on the usb ports? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can it use your 3d card? stuff on the usb ports? firewire? other add in cards?

  11. Re:Just wondering by sveard · · Score: 1

    index => indices
    linux => linuces
    I think

  12. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Names don't get pluralised.

  13. Worst of both worlds by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why on earth would anyone want to run Linux on a Windows box? That's like building your house on a dung hill.

    Though I suppose it comes in handy for accessing those Linux only web sites. ;)

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Worst of both worlds by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Though I suppose it comes in handy for accessing those Linux only web sites. ;)


      Or linux-only apps (And here I thought Linux meant freedom).
    2. Re:Worst of both worlds by Vectronic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But... isnt a house on a dung hill, better than just standing on a dung hill by itself?

      Especially since, you can make the air seem a little more fresh with freshners, take a shower, get out of the sun, etc.

    3. Re:Worst of both worlds by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But... isnt a house on a dung hill, better than just standing on a dung hill by itself?

      Actually, in this case putting the dung hill on top of the house makes the most sense. You get the benefits of living in a house that's not built on a dung pile, and you still get the benefits of the dung pile!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Worst of both worlds by Grakun · · Score: 1

      But... isnt a house on a dung hill, better than just standing on a dung hill by itself? Especially since, you can make the air seem a little more fresh with freshners, take a shower, get out of the sun, etc. Or you could save all of that time and money you'd waste trying to get rid of the smell, and simply build your house elsewhere. Think of all the productive things you could do with that time, if you didn't have to spend it trying to wash off that shitty odor.
    5. Re:Worst of both worlds by Joebert · · Score: 1

      But... isnt a house on a dung hill, better than just standing on a dung hill by itself?

      Only untill you realize it's a piece of crap & try to sell it.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    6. Re:Worst of both worlds by Nimloth · · Score: 1

      Add to that the fact that the applications currently supported almost all run natively for Windows (Firefox, Thunderbird, Gimp, Skype, OO.o, etc).
      Why would I want to run the Linux version of these on Windows, when the Windows version works just fine natively without the overhead?

    7. Re:Worst of both worlds by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would find it nice when I want to use one of the many free applications on Linux that are not available on winblows.  k3b comes to mind...

    8. Re:Worst of both worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on earth would anyone want to run Linux on a Windows box? That's like building your house on a dung hill.

      Wait, wait, wait. Not to disparage your linky Drinkpoo but, if running Linux on Windows is like building your house on a dung hill, wouldn't this be more like building a dung hill on your house?
    9. Re:Worst of both worlds by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      No, wine is not the same as building a dunghill on your house. It is like making your use look like a dung hill to a few select visitors.

      To accomplish a dung hill on your house, you have to run Linux native and use KVM with hardware virtualization support to build the dung hill.

      That's exactly what I do. I get the benefit of a solid house, as well has ability to go to the dung hill when absolutely needed.

    10. Re:Worst of both worlds by smchris · · Score: 1

      I suppose that means running XP on qemu is being anally retentive.

    11. Re:Worst of both worlds by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would anyone want to run Linux on a Windows box? That's like building your house on a dung hill.

      Sounds just as bad as running Windows on top of DOS.
    12. Re:Worst of both worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why on earth would anyone want to run Linux on a Windows box?"

      True. It would be simpler to just run Windows, but disable all the integration between the apps, and scramble all of the GUIs and hotkeys so no two work the same. Oh, and make sure that some apps have to be updated by recompiling from source, while others just update themselves and still others use various arcane packaging schemes. Did I leave anything out?

    13. Re:Worst of both worlds by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Plus then you can grow grass on top and live like a hobbit.
      Or you could use the dung to generate methane to power the house, or grow potatoes? At least get a septic tank..

      (A water-tight analogy)

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    14. Re:Worst of both worlds by turing_m · · Score: 1

      and you still get the benefits of the dung pile!
      Funniest line I've read on slashdot in weeks. Classic.
      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    15. Re:Worst of both worlds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That dung hill has - unfortunately - been deemed "strategic" in my organisation and as a consequence, I'll have to use something like this in order to maintain the several thousand unix servers we support.
      I prefer standing inside a house on a dung hill than slowly sinking into the dung hill itself.

    16. Re:Worst of both worlds by Neil+Jansen · · Score: 1

      The only thing I miss when I'm running Windows is the Gnome desktop. Sure I can re-skin the windows and switch to the Ubuntu startup sounds, but it's not the same. Compiz Fusion for XP or 2000 would also be pretty cool.

  14. Re:Just wondering by ZerMongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except Linux is a name, and thus not subject to normal endings. E.G. Phil Falux's family is not the Faluces. It's the Faluxs. Thus, Linuxs is probably the most correct form, though Linuxes wouldn't be in very bad taste.

  15. Re:Just wondering by sveard · · Score: 1

    I see. But I've got an excuse: english is my third language ;)

  16. Re:Just wondering by _KiTA_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    index => indices
    linux => linuces
    I think I prefer the incorrect Linuxen, if only because I can then imagine giant penguins being used as cattle.

    I would include a sound effect (i.e., Mooooo~) here, but I have no idea what kinda sound effect Penguins do. Perhaps...

    SEGFAUUUUUUUUT~~~~
  17. Re:Just wondering by mdfst13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    index => indices According to Merriam-Webster, indexes is also a valid spelling. In fact, indexes is listed prior to indices, which suggests that it is the preferred spelling.

    Cecil Adams has an interesting discussion of Latin/English pluralizations hidden in a discussion of the proper plural of penis.
  18. Re:Just wondering by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I would include a sound effect (i.e., Mooooo~) here, but I have no idea what kinda sound effect Penguins do.


    The correct sound is Quork!, it seems.
  19. Re:Just wondering by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In fact, indexes is listed prior to indices, which suggests that it is the preferred spelling.

    Either that, or that the dictionary is in alphabetic order, as is the norm for dictionaries...

  20. Re:Just wondering by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 2, Funny

    Linuxoj?

    --
    All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
  21. Konami unavailable for comment by Dwedit · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Ulteo Logo looks like a dead ringer for Konami's old logo.
    I guess this means you need to press Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A to get the thing to boot properly?

    1. Re:Konami unavailable for comment by pablomme · · Score: 1

      No, but if you do it while it's running you get a Blue Screen of Kernel Panic.

      --
      The state you are in while your HEAD is detached... - wait, what?
    2. Re:Konami unavailable for comment by bloodninja · · Score: 0

      Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A Contra!
      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
    3. Re:Konami unavailable for comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this means you need to press Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A to get the thing to boot properly?

      Actually it was Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A B A Start to get your 30 lives in Contra. Man, I can't believe you broght that up! That was like 20 years ago now. Man I must have done that combination 1000's of times! Good memories man.
  22. Re:Just wondering by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Funny

    So Tux becomes Tuces? :D

  23. Re:Can it use your 3d card? stuff on the usb ports by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    In order: no, no, no, no.

    I've run colinux, it provides you a console and a virtual network interface and that's about it. The console has some slow graphics.

    The only one of those I know how to actually get you is to run Cygwin's OpenGL-equipped X server, and then use XDMCP to connect to your colinux VM.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. sweet by RJBeery · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't wait to run WINE on it..

  25. ssa backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why would you want linux running in windoze? Isnt this backwards?

    1. Re:ssa backwards? by xs650 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes it's backwards, it's like making a shit sandwich with the shit on the outside of the bread.

  26. Linux on Windows by typhoonius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, the stability and security of Windows with the application availability of Linux.

    1. Re:Linux on Windows by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      I know the parent was trying to make a joke, but there is some truth for the "application availability of Linux"

    2. Re:Linux on Windows by bloodninja · · Score: 0

      Amarok? Kate? Konqueror? It's really only the KDE applications that I miss when I have to use Windows. I'd love to hear about others.

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
  27. Is it possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to install Wine on Ulteo, and run Unteo within Wine, and run Wine within that instance of Ulteo... Etc?

    1. Re:Is it possible... by jaxtherat · · Score: 1

      *oblig*

      Doomsday device? Ah! Now the ball's in Farnsworth's court!

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
  28. Erm, isn't this backwards? by Keck · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I tend to prefer having the MORE stable OS be the one with direct hardware access, and the flakier OS standing on the other's shoulders. Vmware is the only way I've run windows at home at all in many years, and it works out just fine for me.

    --
    A computer without Microsoft is like ice cream without ketchup.
    1. Re:Erm, isn't this backwards? by corychristison · · Score: 1

      I've found that even WINE is holding it's own now.

      Photoshop CS2 now runs great under WINE. And with it's recent 1.0 RC1 release it's gaining more and more support as it drags its feet to the finish line.

      I know it will never be finished, but it sure works great for those few programs I need (Photoshop, DVD Shrink, and, well, that's about it.)

    2. Re:Erm, isn't this backwards? by Keck · · Score: 1

      Good point! I've used it for a few random shareware apps here and there; a .swf unpacker, etc. I did use crossover office for quite a while, too, on boxes where I didn't need a full windows installation in a VM.

      --
      A computer without Microsoft is like ice cream without ketchup.
    3. Re:Erm, isn't this backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Unfortunately, where I work, we're required to use FIPS 140-2 compliant disk encryption; at the moment, the products we've seen work with Windows, but not with Linux in any type of a dual-boot configuration. If your disk encryption software requires that you be logged into Windows in order to access the hard drive, you're stuck with something like this or VMware - which will bring a laptop to its knees.

      Thoughts?

    4. Re:Erm, isn't this backwards? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I tend to prefer having the MORE stable OS be the one with direct hardware access, and the flakier OS standing on the other's shoulders.

      But what if the flaky OS also has smelly feet besides dandruff?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    5. Re:Erm, isn't this backwards? by Keck · · Score: 1

      Thick socks and cocoa butter.

      --
      A computer without Microsoft is like ice cream without ketchup.
  29. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Tux becomes Tuces? :D

    If:
    Box -> Boxen
    Then:
    Tux -> Tuxen

  30. is this just anti-wine? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    Does it translate linux api/abi calls to windows ones or is it doing something else to avoid being an emulator?

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    1. Re:is this just anti-wine? by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      If it uses COlinux it is a linux disk image that is mounted with the kernel running through the NT kernel as a service. It is a full X install that exports all data to the display ( a running windows port of an Xserver ). At least that is what I am assuming, I already set up colinux to do this on my laptop a while ago, using debian sarge when it first went to old_stable.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  31. Re:Just wondering by Pec · · Score: 1

    Linuxoj? Esperanto Plural? long time not seeing it.
    --
    This is a .sig
  32. Re:Just wondering by Larryish · · Score: 2, Funny
  33. Re:Just wondering by secolactico · · Score: 1

    but I have no idea what kinda sound effect Penguins do. Perhaps...

    Last penguin I heard was singing Boogie Wonderland, so who knows...

    --
    No sig
  34. Some usable things are there... by Dri · · Score: 1

    One of these will someday appeal to PC gamers who only care about their FPS in various obscure games. If we could provide them with a one-click Linux native in Windows we will have loads of new Linux users. This will of course need 3D ACCELERATION (caps) as Compiz is what they usually want. :)

    VMware is doing 3d acceleration the other way around in one of their products which are in beta. Accelerated Windows in a VM in Linux. But, doh! Won't win any gamers over with that one. -1 FPS and it gets the boot!

    --
    Girls are strange. They don't come with a man page.
    -- Michael Mattsson
    1. Re:Some usable things are there... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Now, I just got this from a quick google search, but it looks like it's already out.

      If so, I may just have reason to try Linux again.

    2. Re:Some usable things are there... by Dri · · Score: 1

      Yes, basic Direct3D, like the screensaver works. But if you wanna play games that use shaders and so on you have to get the beta.

      --
      Girls are strange. They don't come with a man page.
      -- Michael Mattsson
  35. You're DOING IT WRONG! by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

    Oy vey. Talk about a solution in search of a problem. WINE exists because there is a huge amount of Windows applications that would be ideal to run on Linux. What on earth is the point of this? Am I just missing something completely obvious?

    1. Re:You're DOING IT WRONG! by Kirkoff · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are a bunch of linux/x apps that I use at home I'd love to be able to use on my windows box at work. Think of stuff like Kate for text editing.

      --
      There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
    2. Re:You're DOING IT WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but you can. I give you the KDE windows port.

      http://windows.kde.org/

    3. Re:You're DOING IT WRONG! by bloodninja · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oy vey. Talk about a solution in search of a problem. WINE exists because there is a huge amount of Windows applications that would be ideal to run on Linux. What on earth is the point of this? Am I just missing something completely obvious? At the university I _have_ to use Windows. I even have a hard time booting LiveCDs. So I depend a lot on portableapps.com and my USB flash drive. If I could get a whole Linux environment up, running at near-native performance (not like qmeu that barely runs) then I'd be set.
      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
  36. Re:Just wondering by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

    Thus, Linuxs is probably the most correct form

    I can't believe that got modded Insightful. What sort of illiterate moderators do we have on here?

    English words ending in x add es to make a plural. Do you say "boxs"??

    It is a proper noun anyway, so if you need a plural, you should say "distributions of".

    I also hope there was no seriousness in the suggestions that plurals in -ces and -ii would be appropriate.

  37. Don't criticize the Holy Trinity of the Internet by fistfullast33l · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ubuntu, Apple, and Barack Obama.

    Honorable Mention: Ron Paul

    Special Slashdot Addition: Nintendo

  38. Re:Just wondering by AlexBirch · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're right, so your post is like fex, and when you post a second time you have feces.

  39. Re:Just wondering by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

    Some list words in decreasing order of popularity, though.
    At least my Oxford's does that.

  40. I don't know... by tehBoris · · Score: 5, Informative

    But isn't that project you linked more like Wubi?

    Instead of being a Windows port of the Linux kernel (yeah... weird) like and/coLinux is, it is a Windows based Linux installer, which stuffs the whole distro's file system into a single file in your Windows' partition.

    1. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coLinux isn't a Windows port of the Linux kernel. It's a Linux-specific virtualization platform.

  41. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, *I* thought this was clever!

  42. Re:Yet another QuantumG troll by FLEB · · Score: 1

    Who runs 3D accellerated stuff in a VM anyways?

    Perhaps if 3D-accelerated VMs were more widespread...

    --
    Information wants to be free.
    Entertainment wants to be paid.
    You just want to be cheap.
  43. Awesome if you want to run your Linux apps at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to be integrated very well into the Windows desktop: open windows show up in the taskbar, you can print to Windows printers, store files in "My Documents". I would not even consider Ulteo for my own machines, but on a Windows desktop at work, this will give me access to most of my fave Linux apps. Not bad!

  44. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a clue:
    It's never ii.
    Never.
    I don't care what you think you know about Latin, but we speak English, and in English you pluralize with -s or -es.

    Some prescriptivists with a Classical fetish in the past have promoted words like "cacti", but the reality is that "cactuses" is perfectly acceptable modern English.

    Even if -s or -es turns out to be wrong, you'll just look like you made an understandable mistake.
    If you use -i or (even worse) -ii and it's wrong, then you'll look like an utter moron.

  45. Yeah, it's not that new, but... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    Indeed, coLinux has existed for several years. And for much of that time there have been distros specialized to use it. But the way these things work is that some new feature starts out in obscure specialist projects and slowly migrates to the larger distributions. When Ubuntu itself picks up coLinux support, that will also be newsworthy.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  46. Re:Just wondering by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

    In fact, indexes is listed prior to indices, which suggests that it is the preferred spelling.

    Either that, or that the dictionary is in alphabetic order, as is the norm for dictionaries...

    Most dictionaries list alternative spellings and plurals after a noun. This is most likely to what the GP was referring.

    E.g.: index, noun (pl. -dexes or esp. in technical use -dices)

    --
    Stop! Dremel time!
  47. Re:Yet another QuantumG troll by VisceralLogic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who runs 3D accellerated stuff in a VM anyways?

    Also, who runs 3D accelerated stuff in Linux?

    --
    Stop! Dremel time!
  48. Please for the love of Gods... by AngelWind · · Score: 1

    make MythTV work on this! Since I see no distributed frontends that don't suck or won't work correctly in Windows, this may finally be the answer to all those prayers. My girlfriend is not interested in running Linux, but she sometimes wants to watch her shows while she's running raids in WoW. This would make her very happy as running her shows through a SMB share doesn't help since the shows use their own naming scheme that doesn't exactly tell her what it is.

  49. Re:Yet another Slashdot stalker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, as long as you stop trolling I'll be glad to accomodate your request. The sacrifice would be worth it for the huge improvement in quality we'd see here.

  50. Reiser remembered it in Jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I seem to be able to remember too that 10 years ago someone showed me this at work and I was in awe. And then it crashed.

    1. Re:Reiser remembered it in Jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, it was nearly 10 years ago when I started running Windows in VMware on Linux (I was on the pre-1.0 beta team).

  51. Maybe it's YMMV by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    I didn't find it to be all that slow from a screen refresh standpoint. I haven't tried any OpenGL stuff yet but that I mostly do on a native Linux box, not via virtualization.

    I guess "Pick the right tool for the job" is what comes to mind.

  52. Re:Yet another Slashdot stalker by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    You're the only one who thinks it is a troll.. I think you're just upset that it is +5 and you disagree.

    BTW - there is one VM that does virtualization of 3d hardware.. VMWare Fusion. Back when I worked for VMWare they were talking about doing it, but it was always pushed off to the next release. It's for the Mac so I haven't used it, so I don't know how great it is, and there's probably good reasons why it can't be done on Windows or Linux hosts.

    Also, the Cygwin/X server (that Ulteo uses) currently uses the Mesa 3d library for OpenGL support, which is completely software with no 3d acceleration. This is the easiest route to add OpenGL extensions to Cygwin/X and is better than nothing, but I imagine that eventually someone will start calling the Windows OpenGL implementation instead and then Ulteo will be massively better.

    I don't know who you are, but you seem to have an axe to grind and I think if you just stop and be a little reasonable you'll see that I'm not "trolling" or whatever - I just have different opinions to you. Wouldn't the world be boring if we all automatically agreed?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  53. The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by fm6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whenever people hear a word that ends with "s" (or that sounds like it should), they assume that there's some silly grammatical rule that they need to know about. There is a rule, but it's so hard to follow, you shouldn't even try.

    Here's the rule: a lot of words that end with "-us" (not all of them! more on that in a moment) are borrowed from Latin. In that language, a noun ending with "-us" is a singluar form (dominus, lord; servus, slave) that takes a plural form ending in "-i" (domini, lords; servi, slaves). In theory, it's more "correct" to use foreign inflections with foreign words. So instead of "octopuses", "styluses", and "circuses", people say "octopi", "styli", and "circi".

    No, wait, nobody says "circi", do they? It's the "correct" usage, because it's a Latin word, but the established usage is "circuses".

    The other examples I gave are commonly used, but are in no sense "correct". "Octopus" does not come from Latin: it's a Greek word, and the Greek plural is "octopods". "Stylus" is Latin, but it's misspelled Latin: the Romans spelled it "stilus". It got changed to "stylus" because somebody thought it was somehow derived from the Greek word "stylos". But it's not, so the "correct" way to refer to that thing that comes with your PDA is "stilus" and "stili".

    But to heck with being "correct". It's the tar baby of the literate. Just use the rules you learned in grade school and be done with it.

    1. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by hedwards · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But to heck with being "correct". It's the tar baby of the literate. Just use the rules you learned in grade school and be done with it. What's correct is what the vast majority of people do. That doesn't mean that using words like alot is really proper, but with the number of people misspelling that one, we may as well just admit that the spelling has changed, it would save an awful lot of red ink.

      These sorts of arguments pop up frequently, and really as long as people can tell what is being said, there isn't really a good reason to argue too much about it. The speakers of the various languages will figure out a spelling, which will then be declared archaic and replaced with something knew. It's been happening for millenia.

      Really, we ought to be migrating towards rules which are like the ones in grade school, except easy to understand and predictable. Some irregularities are going to crop up. But those should really be reserved for times when the alternative can't be pronounced.
    2. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by fm6 · · Score: 1

      What's correct is what the vast majority of people do. Incorrect! If that were true, all the common idioms that most people use would be "correct". Most people use double negatives, but try putting one in your English class essay!

      In theory, "correct" English is the language used by the most educated people. But since those people can't quite agree as to exactly what it is, it's pretty much a myth.

      ...as long as people can tell what is being said, there isn't really a good reason to argue too much about it. But a key purpose of the rules is to facilitate communication. If you don't get at least a little anal about grammatical rules, it's darn easy to be misunderstood. Or at least sound silly: "Walking up the stairs, the clock struck 3."

      The Rules serve another purpose: to help identify the "literate" Elite and distinguish them from the "illiterate" multitude. I don't suppose you consider that a valid reason to worry about grammatical rules (I certainly don't) but it is the main reason people do.

    3. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suddenly feel more stupider.

    4. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by Curien · · Score: 1

      Double-negatives aren't always incorrect.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    5. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only that octopus is greek, not latin, so the plural is "octopodes".

      Oh, and not all latin words ending with "-us" have a plural form ending in -i. (Domus, -us, see: romanes ite domum)

    6. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by journeymanmetal · · Score: 1

      >which will then be declared archaic and replaced with something knew. >replaced with something knew. >something knew >knew Gods, I hope you're not suggesting we switch to your way of spelling a simple three-letter word everyone learned to spell before they got to school.

    7. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by potmosgraecus · · Score: 1

      No. "Octopus" is the latin form. The greek form is "Oktapous". But Linux is not in any way a word with a latin ending. Nor does it seem like possible to be used in plural form in a sentence of any kind.

    8. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

      correct potmosgracaecus. "Linux" is a proper noun - a name so it uses the same rules for a name.

    9. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by fm6 · · Score: 1

      For example?

    10. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The Greek spelling is omicron kappa tau omega pi omicron upsilon sigma. Greek has its own alphabet and transliterating to the Latin alphabet is purely a matter of convention. Your transliteration assumes that Greek letters are equivalent to the Latin letters they most resemble. That would be too easy!

      In English, Greek loan words are always spelled using a phonetic convention. Hence "-ous" becomes "-us". Kappa is never transliterated as k (don't ask me why) but as C. Hence "cinema" instead of "kinema".

      The Romans didn't use K until they conquered Greece and started reading a lot of Greek. Then they used K for Greek words and C otherwise. That's why we have two "kuh" letters.

      So the presence of C identifies "octopus" as a Greek word! Strange, but true.

      As for Linux: We all know it's not Latin. Lighten up, this thread is supposed to be humorous.

    11. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by sporkme · · Score: 1

      When my aunt was young, she sat down to the dinner table and declared that she had no appetite because of something she had seen while riding her bike that that evening. When the family asked her why she couldn't eat, she exclaimed, "Have you ever seen a dead dog riding on a bicycle with its guts hanging out?"

      Her father asked, "Well, wouldn't his guts get tangled in the spokes?" She burst into tears.

      Double negatives are not always correct.
      Double negatives are always not correct.

    12. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me failed English? That's unpossible!

    13. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the rule: a lot of words that end with "-us" (not all of them! more on that in a moment) are borrowed from Latin. In that language, a noun ending with "-us" is a singluar form (dominus, lord; servus, slave) that takes a plural form ending in "-i" (domini, lords; servi, slaves). As another AC has pointed out, that's not a totally correct description of Latin inflection. You are thinking of 2nd declension masculine nouns and adjectives, but there is more out there. Some examples:

      In the famous saying "Cuius regio, eius religio", "cuius" and "eius" end in "-us", but are genitive singular.

      In the prayer Ave Maria (Hail Mary), the words "peccatoribus" and "mulieribus" end in "-us", but are ablative plural.

      The word "corpus" is nominative singular, but it is 3rd declension neuter, so its nominative plural is "corpora".

      The word "domus" is nominative singular, but it is 4th declension, so its nominative plural is "domus".

      Of course, this illustrates your point that we shouldn't demand people to use foreign loanwords in a quasi-correct way according to their source language. It would mean learning a large set of rules for the foreign language, plus the language may have regional dialects or various changes over the centuries. (In the later days of Latin, authors started to treat "domus" as though it were second declension.)
    14. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 1

      but circa isnt greek! its latin. and female. haha. i never knew about circi until now. oh, and anyways ain't a word. unless you accept that living languages are always adapting and evolving and in a living language anything can be proper grammar. including but not limited to: linux, linuxs, linuxes, linuxen, linuxi, and linuxassses.

    15. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by potmosgraecus · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the lesson about my own language, but I would tend to insist that a) in greek there is an alpha between tau and pi (instead of an omega) b) the word (like virtually all greek loanwords) has entered english through its latin form, not directly from greek.

    16. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I'm not telling you about your own language. I'm telling you about classical Greek. Unless you're really old, you speak modern Greek. Languages do change over the centuries, as your spelling illustrates.

      Also, we're not just talking about Greek, we're also talking about the weird conventions English has for handling non-Latin alphabets. So your claim for superior knowledge would be irrelevant even if it weren't fallacious.

    17. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by potmosgraecus · · Score: 1

      The "weird conventions" (as they seem to you) used in transliteration from Greek to Latin alphabet, are not weird at all.

      First of all, almost all Greek words used in English are not directly borrowed from the Greek language. They travelled first through the Latin language. English-speaking nations never came in direct contact with Greek-speaking nations. Therefore, the "weird conventions" are just the rules for transliteration from Greek to Latin. Of course English-speaking people are not using the alphabet in the same way as the Latin-speaking Romans did. That's why the rules of Greek-to-Latin transliteration seem "weird conventions" to you.

      Secondly, I will insist that the word "octopus", in that exact form, cannot be declined with the rules of the Greek language (i.e. it cannot be "octopodes" in the nominative of the plural), because it has been adapted to the Latin declination system. So, knowing that in Greek the original word is spelled omikron-kappa-tau-ALPHA-pi-omikron-upsilon-sigma, makes this matter clearer.

      I also have studied the many older forms of my language for many many years, enough to prove my claim would not be fallacious, even if it was irrelevant.

    18. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by fm6 · · Score: 1

      According to the OED, both spellings were used, though the omega spelling was more common. From the assumption that the alpha spelling is the only "real Greek" spelling, you build a complicated argument that contradicts a lot what I know about social and linguistic history. I'm hardly on expert, but it's obvious you aren't either.

      I could attempt to correct you on several points, not just the history you've got wrong, but the way you keep misrepresenting what I've said. But would it penetrate? Obviously not.

      So I'll just repeat the central argument that you find it convenient to ignore: the Romans spelled Greek loanwords with a kappa using K , not C. This is not my pet theory, this is widely accepted as the way the letter K was invented. So if "octopus" had come by way of Latin, it would be spelled with a K.

      This is the key detail of my argument. You haven't refuted it. You haven't even contradicted it.

      If you're just going to ignore my arguments, please take your insults and your poorly informed theories and go bother somebody else.

    19. Re:The Humorless Language Nazi Explains it All by potmosgraecus · · Score: 1

      adieu

  54. Vs. Cygwin by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to use Windows on my work computer, but I need to run some unix apps, primarily C++ apps that I compile using g++. So, I use Cygwin. Is this a potential replacement, and if so, why?

    --
    The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    1. Re:Vs. Cygwin by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is a potential replacement. It should have far better compatibility (as the apps would be running in their native environment, not a compatibility layer), but it might (maybe) be slower. Last time I tried Cygwin, though, it had HORRIBLE data transfer rates (which caused ClamWin to be PAINFULLY slow), so it's possible the coLinux solution is simply faster (depending on how the distro is setup).

    2. Re:Vs. Cygwin by tangent3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, and definitely I would say it seems that coLinux was made with being a better alternative to cygwin/mingw in mind. I've been happily using AndLinux (Kubuntu + coLinux distro) running on my Windows XP for C++ development.

  55. Think up some better lies......... by budword · · Score: 1

    GIRLFRIEND and WoW. Haha. AND, girlfriend who PLAYS WoW. This is slashdot buddy, we know you are making it up.

    1. Re:Think up some better lies......... by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      Bagh, stop giving him a hard time. Maybe she's emulated... or maybe he used Wine. ;)

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    2. Re:Think up some better lies......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a funnier joke that he tries to make it seem like a heterosexual would use that faggot ass fuck shit excuse for an operating system. unless he's a she and that makes sense because than her butch dyke girlfriend probably likes to record the gay bitch channel. fucking dyke cunt whores.

    3. Re:Think up some better lies......... by AngelWind · · Score: 1

      Someone's bitter...better go use that free hand of yours to relieve some of that pent up tension, because that's all you're going to get with language like that.

  56. Re:Yet another QuantumG troll by beaverbrother · · Score: 1

    Who runs 3D accellerated stuff in a VM anyways? People who want to run linux, play games and not dual boot.
  57. Re:Just wondering by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Some prescriptivists with a Classical fetish in the past have promoted words like "cacti", but the reality is that "cactuses" is perfectly acceptable modern English. In general, I agree with you. However, "cactus" is sort of different because it's not Classical Latin, it's Scientific Latin. If you said "cactus" to a Roman, he wouldn't have thought you were talking about a thorny succulent, because he never would have seen one — it's a New World plant. In Classical Latin, "cactus" refers to the cardoon.

    The modern usage comes from Linnaeus's arbitrary appropriation of the word to describe a quite different family of plants. So your prescriptivist would be a nonclassical type.

    Of course, it's still silly and pretentious to say "cacti".
  58. No real point for end users? by Rossjman1 · · Score: 1

    While this may be a well suited way of emulation for developers (although nothing can beat a real pure Linux install), I just don't see the point for end users. Considering that most Linux applications are also ported to Windows, there isn't any real use for the average user. And I know some people here are going to say that the ports are not as quick or executed as well as the Linux counterpart, but doesn't the bloat of this virtualized Linux-in-Windows system outweigh the crappyness of the Windows port?

  59. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That makes sense, after all, if you run Linux on a Server Box you obviously run Linices on your server boces!

    A pox on you theory, in fact... two poces!

  60. Re:Yet another QuantumG troll by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

    Who runs 3D accellerated stuff in a VM anyways? I'd love to be able to do so. KOTOR 2 doesn't run under Vista for me, so I have to keep an XP install around if I want to play it.
    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  61. Re:Just wondering by Kalriath · · Score: 1

    Except that the plural of Box is not Boxen. Stop making up words.

    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  62. I've been waiting for this by TekPolitik · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been waiting for this, because what I have always really wanted was to combine the application compatibility of Linux with the operating system reliability of Windows.

  63. We need Linux applications not a virtual desktop by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    "Babygirl you on the right track
    But you going the wrong way"

    With respect to Timbaland ft. The Hives - Throw It On Me.

    It is great to promote Linux, but the big reason why most people don't use Linux is not because they cannot run it, but because Linux doesn't run the software they want to use.

    Be it commercial games like Worlds of Warcraft, or the business applications that they need to run their business.

    Look, the real reason why Vista doesn't take off is because Vista won't run most legacy Windows programs.

    WINE doesn't cut it, nice try, but you either have to tweak WINE or used a hacked/cracked version of the commercial software that has been modified to work with WINE due to copyright protection.

    Another reason why people don't use Linux is lack of third party driver support. Most people can get video and audio support, but wireless, NIC, winmodems, forget it unless you like using NDISWrapper and hope you can hack the Windows drivers to work properly without dropping your connection. Either that or try experimental drivers that need kernel headers and code tweakings to be able to work with modern gcc compilers and Linux kernels.

    Run Linux in a virtual machine, fine and dandy. It is one more step towards weening people off of Windows and into Linux. Now all you need are the software programs and drivers that most people need to get things done.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  64. Re:We need Linux applications not a virtual deskto by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Be it commercial games like Worlds of Warcraft, or the business applications that they need to run their business. Wow, can you pick a worse example or what? World Of Warcraft runs on Linux.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  65. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, so did i

  66. Re:Yet another Slashdot stalker by kramulous · · Score: 1

    Looks like you need to add "Anonymous Coward" to your friends list.

    --
    .
  67. Re:Just wondering by tpheiska · · Score: 1

    It depends on how pro-latin english speaker you are. Those words belong to the third declension and if you consider linux to be a latin-based word it would indeed be linuces. But then you also have antenna, pl. antennae and datum, pl. data.

    "All linuces I have worked with have some malformed datum bits when connected to several wireless antennae"

    --
    "wahts woring iwth my tyoping?"
  68. Re:Yet another Slashdot stalker by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Yeah, he's fucked me there.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  69. Re:Legal and romantic advice. by felixdzerzhinsky · · Score: 1

    How can I get a divorce from my wife and a brand new Asian girlfriend?

    --
    "Flags are bits of colored cloth that governments use first to shrink-wrap people's brains..."
  70. Re:We need Linux applications not a virtual deskto by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    "WINE doesn't cut it, nice try, but you either have to tweak WINE or used a hacked/cracked version of the commercial software that has been modified to work with WINE due to copyright protection."

    Please read how to get Worlds of Warcraft working under WINE, the average person doesn't want to take that many steps to make it work, plus using a hacked/cracked version that might have a trojan inside of it stealing data.

    What I am talking about is having a Worlds of Warcraft native Linux version, just insert the CD, install, then play. No messing around with command lines, using malware cracked versions to patch it with, tweaking system files, changing WINE configurations, using WINE addons, and even still having game freezes and lockups even if everything is configured correctly.

    You are just too damn stupid to read my entire post, aren't you? Most Linux geeks are like that.

    Windows users don't want to do half-a-million steps, and use malware hacked files, and then still have freezes and lockups just to get WINE working properly to run games inside of it. They don't even want to RTFM or RTFA about what they need to do to force WINE to work the way they want it to work or Linux for that matter. They want an OS that works the way they want it to work, and native software programs that don't need crappy things like WINE to work, and native driver support for their third party software that is reliable, and an easy to use and configure OS that doesn't need complex steps to use, it shouldn't force the average user to read books or web pages, or to even think, it should be intuitive enough to work that the user just clicks the mouse a few times and takes no less than a few minutes to get things working. This isn't that hard to figure out. But really stupid people don't understand that, and thus they fail to see why Linux hasn't caught on as well as Windows has, or even Mac OSX is catching on. Windows and Mac OSX don't need too much work to get things to work, unlike Linux.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  71. Re:We need Linux applications not a virtual deskto by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Yes, you are telling me all sorts of new things here that I didn't know before. Thank you so much for enlightening me and no doubt everyone else on this site.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  72. Re:Just wondering by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    English words ending in x add es
    to make a plural. Do you say "boxs"?? No, I say "boces".

  73. Backwards by Skylinux · · Score: 1

    No need to reboot the system anymore to switch from Windows to Linux." OK, but it is the wrong way. To me Windows XP is a gaming OS at best and because I install/uninstall games the OS gets screwed up every 6 months to 1 year. So why would I run my rock solid installation of Linux on top of something that is guaranteed to crash eventually....

    Now if this where reversed, Windows on top of Linux with close to full speed and with full 3D support for my nVidia card, I would be taking out my credit card. But not like this.
    --
    Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    1. Re:Backwards by BrentH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know what I do these days is running Ubuntu inside a (seamless) virtual machine in Windows. Windows has to be native for the games, and it doesn't matter how often Windows is borked, the Ubuntu VM image is on a different partition and as soon as I've reinstalled windows I can load that image up and *boom* my entire desktop with all my sweet little apps are there again without reinstalling anything. Best of both worlds. The only thing better (aside from Linux supporting my games ;)) would be virtualizable graphics, so that I can run Linux native and Windows in a virtual machine.

  74. Re:Just wondering by tpheiska · · Score: 1

    I also hope there was no seriousness in the suggestions that plurals in -ces and -ii would be appropriate.

    How about radius, radii? I think there's no contest there.
    --
    "wahts woring iwth my tyoping?"
  75. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the original plural form is probably "Linuxit", as Finns pronounce it that way. (Suffix is 't'. A stemming vowel 'i' is added for pronounciation.)

  76. it was though... by samjam · · Score: 4, Funny

    it was though, a perfectly cromulent word.

  77. Re:Do it the right way by Technician · · Score: 1

    Why would you want linux running in windoze? Isnt this backwards?

    It can be done, but only for older versions.

    http://win4lin.net/content/

    I haen't tried it. I use windows so seldom that I couldn't justify the cost. I simply dual boot instead for free.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  78. Re:Can it use your 3d card? stuff on the usb ports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order: no, no, no, no. Thanks to clarify, I was getting lost!
  79. Re:Yet another Slashdot stalker by vux984 · · Score: 1

    It's for the Mac so I haven't used it, so I don't know how great it is, and there's probably good reasons why it can't be done on Windows or Linux hosts.

    Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if Vista could pull it off. The whole underpinnings of 'aero glass', in terms of the hardware abstraction layer its got, are essentially exactly what you'd need to 3d accelerate a VM.

  80. that's easy enough by alizard · · Score: 1

    Buy an (female) Asian sheep. That takes care of the "girlfriend" part. Get caught by your wife and several of her friends with you and the sheep having wild, passionate sex. The divorce should follow quickly Glad I could help.

    DISCLAIMER: you said nothing about looking for good advice.

  81. think of it as an incentive to by alizard · · Score: 1

    back up very, very regularly.

    Also note that one can already run VMware Server using a Windows host, though I don't quite understand why anyone would want to. I'm using a Windows VM to run W98SE (I'm running Eudora/Windows and waiting for Eudora/Linux to become ready for prime time) and instead of having it crash daily on native hardware, it crashes every few weeks in a VM. I have no more idea than you do why one would prefer an unstable host and a stable VM to the reverse.

    The only downside I've noticed with VMware Server is that there are some kinds of DOS graphic modes the virtual video card just won't do.

  82. the proprietary VirtualBox by alizard · · Score: 1

    is available as a .deb from Sun for personal use for free. Main difference? USB access from the VM. (which is extremely useful)

    1. Re:the proprietary VirtualBox by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Ya but I needed VirtualBox on windows; not the other way around.

  83. Re:Just wondering by dargaud · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what kinda sound effect Penguins do Check it out on my sig then (or the associated FAQ page).
    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  84. Re:We need Linux applications not a virtual deskto by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    Another reason why people don't use Linux is lack of third party driver support.

    I liked your argument until you made this statement.

    Corporate IT people keep the makes and models of user desktops and laptops to a minimum. This means that they can roll out Windows PCs quickly and just using one of a handful of build images if they need to rollout a new machine or rebuild an existing one.

    Yes, drivers under Linux can still be a problem - but with diligent hardware selection, that problem goes away.

    So it still comes down to the fact that if you keep to a fixed but supported subset of hardware, Linux is as easy (or with a modular kernel easier) to get hardware working as it is under Windows.

    You just need to spend a little more time researching what hardware works well first...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  85. Odd choice for "supported" apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Under the "supported applications" they list:

    KPdf to deal with your PDF documents

    But under the installation requirements they indicate a PDF reader is needed... seems like if I had to have a PDF reader to install it in the first place, I've probably already got a solution for "dealing" with those pesky PDF documents.
  86. Mirrors? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    First, I can't believe they've never heard of Bit Torrent. They're actively asking for mirrors because they are overloaded. -sigh-

    Second, why all the irrationality on here? This -does- serve a purpose for some people. I prefer Quanta Plus as my web IDE and as far as I know, there isn't a version that runs on windows yet. I'm hoping someone will make it run on KDE4-Win soon and save me the hassle of something like this.

    But even once I get that, there are other apps that I'll want to be able to run (or test!) in Linux, even if I'm actually in Windows at the time.

    I just bought a tablet PC and as much as I love Kubuntu, tablets and tablet PCs do not run well with Linux. I'm not going to sacrifice functionality that I already have just to run Linux, but I would prefer that 'free' (as in speech) software run on it as well. Lemme say that again more clearly: I should be free to run it on any operating system I choose.

    This helps support that freedom, and I like it.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Mirrors? by TexasDex · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      The Cheese Stands Alone.
  87. A castle built on sand by Jerry · · Score: 1

    (nt)

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  88. Texmaker by backwardMechanic · · Score: 2, Informative

    You may like Texmaker. It's developed by the guy who originally wrote Kile, but doesn't depend on KDE so runs on anything. I switched because I wanted to use the same editor under Win and Linux, but actually prefer it now.

  89. WinE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one having trouble getting this to work in WinE?

    1. Re:WinE? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      It isn't going to work in wine, wine only emulates win32, colinux uses a custom driver to do it's dirty work.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  90. Re:Yet another Slashdot stalker by Friggo · · Score: 1

    There is virtualization of 3D hardware in the current beta for VMWare Workstation 6.5.

  91. MOD PARENT FUNNY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Come on mods!! Why do you give fuckheads, like this, points??

    Whenever people hear a word that ends with "s" (or that sounds like it should), they assume that there's some silly grammatical rule that they need to know about. There is a rule, but it's so hard to follow, you shouldn't even try.

    Here's the rule: a lot of words that end with "-us" (not all of them! more on that in a moment) are borrowed from Latin. In that language, a noun ending with "-us" is a singluar form (dominus, lord; servus, slave) that takes a plural form ending in "-i" (domini, lords; servi, slaves). In theory, it's more "correct" to use foreign inflections with foreign words. So instead of "octopuses", "styluses", and "circuses", people say "octopi", "styli", and "circi".

    No, wait, nobody says "circi", do they? It's the "correct" usage, because it's a Latin word, but the established usage is "circuses".

    The other examples I gave are commonly used, but are in no sense "correct". "Octopus" does not come from Latin: it's a Greek word, and the Greek plural is "octopods". "Stylus" is Latin, but it's misspelled Latin: the Romans spelled it "stilus". It got changed to "stylus" because somebody thought it was somehow derived from the Greek word "stylos". But it's not, so the "correct" way to refer to that thing that comes with your PDA is "stilus" and "stili".

    But to heck with being "correct". It's the tar baby of the literate. Just use the rules you learned in grade school and be done with it. So, it's incorrect, but since "circi" sounds odd, we should continue to say "circuses", but Linuces is wrong, and if we add an "s" to the suffices, of wait, that's not plural, or is it plurii, and . . . but, hold on a sec . . . shouldn't it be Linux's'es', . . . um, now I'm confused.

    Or are you just breaking my balls?

    Pretty funny, Humorless Language Nazi.

    Basically, what you are saying is: Here are the rules, well, sort of, but don't follow them anyway, because they're too confusing and you're too stupid, and I'll still criticize you for being incorrect anyway, so just keep doing it the way you're doing it, you illiterate piece of shit.

    Now, fuck off and learn to take a joke, you asshole.
  92. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that the plural of Box is not Boxen. Stop making up words.


    http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/B/boxen.html

    Lurk more.
  93. Tickets for the application balls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello, my NGO in China would like to purchase tickets for the Ulteo application balls. We would also like to have the following information: 1) Will the dress be formal? 2) We have been told the events in Huan Hung Lo have been cancelled due to the earthquakes, is this correct? 3) What are the ticket prices for groups of 50 or more? 4) Where/how may the tickets be purchased? Thanks in advance!

  94. Usefulness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know that this is a beta, but the damn thing uses up 97% of my CPU. If this is supposed to be a way to use Windows apps and Linux apps in the same environment, it doesn't work when the VM pegs the CPU near 100%.

  95. offtopic - Re:Just wondering by spidercoz · · Score: 2, Informative
    As I stated in another thread on another site yesterday, siting references to fake online dictionaries does not constitute proof that this is, in fact, a word.

    Read more.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  96. Re: Phat Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work on Phat Linux years ago and I have to say this is different.
    Phat used a loop back file, that is its whole filesystem was contained
    in a Windows file. But one still had to reboot to swtich between Windows
    and Linux.

  97. Wow, It Really Works! by bratwiz · · Score: 1

    Now I can run my Linux apps as slowly as my Windows apps!

    Yay!!!

  98. thank you by namekuseijin · · Score: 0

    But no, never had any need to boot Windows ever again.

    --
    I don't feel like it...
  99. Re:Just wondering by BrianGKUAC · · Score: 1

    Right on. So I should start referring to them as Linux boces. Awesome.

    --
    Menus: Linux=function, Windows=vendor, OS X=as little as possible. Makes a statement, don't you think?
  100. Re:Yet another Slashdot stalker by sporkme · · Score: 1

    Lately I have been using TeamViewer for Windows remote support. It is a lot easier for end users to configure. It even has a standalone executable and can start as a service. Sometimes I have to work on machines remotely from Vista, so it's a no-brainer. It is faster than the online linux desktop offered by Ulteo, but that's not saying much - as always, VNC-type things are slow as hell.

  101. Re:We need Linux applications not a virtual deskto by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    I am only stating the obvious. Most people on this site already know the obvious but ignore it because it hurts their ego. They try to sell people on Linux and WINE and ignore that it is a pain in the ass to get Worlds of Warcraft to work for the average person, who feels it is too much work and go back to using Windows. Sure it can work, but at what cost? Most people are too busy with family life and working a full time job to spend the extra hours it takes to read a WINE Howto, but the average Slashdot reader is either unemployed or is not married, and has the extra time to kill in order to get Worlds of Warcraft or (Insert Software Name Here) working in WINE under Linux. Not like most here have a social life at all, much less a job, due to the fact that their ego is so huge they look like a jerk to normal people.

    It is not a problem with enlightenment, it is more of a problem of evolution and social skills, the average Slashdot reader cannot help it as he/she was born that way. They even ignore that being a jerk and telling a normal person to RTFA or RTFM is actually going to help them, instead of hurt them emotionally and psychologically. Some of us actually have read or taken a class in Software Psychology, but obviously the average Slashdot readers and Linux and WINE coders have not.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  102. Software Psychology by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    It just figures that Wikipedia does not have an entry on it. Most colleges don't teach it any more, or even how to write standard code and debug programs anymore. It is starting to become arcane knowledge and a dead skill like Latin, DOS/VSE JCL, or PL/1.

    Software Psychology is very important and Apple does it much better than Microsoft does it. Linux and Unix in general do not even try to follow Software Psychology and just are written for computer geeks with commands like "kill" that go against what Software Psychology teaches.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  103. Re:We need Linux applications not a virtual deskto by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Again, I can't take seriously anyone who thinks it is actually called Worlds of Warcraft.

    You're an idiot, go away now.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  104. Re:Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But:
    ox -> oxen

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ox

  105. phatlinux isn't the same thing at all by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    phatlinux isn't the same thing at all. Ulteo and andLinux let me run Windows and Linux at the same time.

    phatlinux is just an installer. If you want to use Linux, you still need to reboot.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."