Slashdot Mirror


Expert Dissects Estonian Cyber-War

Stony Stevenson points out an iTnews summary of a security researcher's account of the cyber-attacks on Estonia last year. The full report [PDF] is also available. We've discussed this internet-based conflict in the past. From the report: "In the days leading up to the attack, numerous clues pointed to a large-scale operation that was being planned online. Russian-language Internet discussion forums were abuzz with preparations for an online attack. Three days before the expected onslaught, Estonia planned to release the news of the coming strike in hopes that European media attention would oblige the EU to pressure the Kremlin to intervene, whether or not the attacks emanated from the Russian authorities."

172 comments

  1. Estonia planned to release the news by LameAssTheMity · · Score: 2, Funny

    And the mass media scores big again!

  2. Defcon Talk was better by yamamushi · · Score: 3, Informative

    This talk at Defcon 15 was much better: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5362349666961901582

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
    1. Re:Defcon Talk was better by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Really? I found that nearly impossible to watch.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    2. Re:Defcon Talk was better by DetrimentalFiend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm 5 minutes into the talk and he still hasn't said anything even close to interesting but has made a complete ass of himself. I didn't RTFA, but it must be pretty bad if this is "much better".

    3. Re:Defcon Talk was better by emilper · · Score: 1


      hmmm...

      ping -n 5000 -l 1000 localhost
      ping: cannot set preload to value > 3

      did those blogs give info about how to patch and recompile your ping tool ?

      4Mbps hostile traffic brought down a whole country that used to practically live on the internet ? Do they keep all their web servers on a 586 ?

      Estonians use their internet banking all the time and most have not been to a bank in person in the last 10 years ?? How do they give the signature specimen for a new CC when the old one expires ?

    4. Re:Defcon Talk was better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I not have time for questions...

      I not have time for prepare internet warfare

      I not have time to present speech on cyber from Russia

    5. Re:Defcon Talk was better by dintech · · Score: 1

      I know, I had to hide behind the couch!

    6. Re:Defcon Talk was better by yamamushi · · Score: 1

      And yet none of you have figured out that the guy giving the speech is the same guy mentioned in the article.

      --
      - Aetheral Research -
  3. In Estonia... by TRAyres · · Score: 1

    Cyber-War causes real conflict!

  4. Yes, yes, and... by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What are nations going to do about it? Many networks are spanning-tree, not mesh, and far too many countries have far too few cross-border gateways that are independent. The cyberattack could have been shut down within 5-10 seconds, with minimal loss of connectivity, if the network had been designed correctly. DDoS attacks aren't limited to governments - the DoS attacks that led to changes in TCP/IP to limit/block such attacks were the effort of some cybercriminal-wannabe, and that was mid 90s. Today, we have inline proactive intrusion detection systems, congestion blocking for UDP and unresponsive flows, routing algorithms that eliminate single points of failure, and the such. What excuse does anyone have, today, for being vulnerable to this? People are vaccinated against common deadly diseases, networks are (or should be) innoculated against common (and potentially deadly) cyberattacks.

    Estonia I can almost forgive, as they're relatively poor and didn't have much time to go from Soviet-era attitudes to something saner. They should still have done more. What bothers me much more is that the scorecards for US departments make it clear that the US is even less prepared for a cyberwar than even Balkan castoffs.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Yes, yes, and... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Increasingly, people aren't vaccinated against common deadly diseases (apparently, in some areas, vaccination rates are starting to slip below where you want them to prevent rapid spreading). It shouldn't be any surprise that such a lapse in reason is present elsewhere.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Yes, yes, and... by antirelic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah yes, mark it up as it calls out the US for being less prepared than a post cold war soviet satellite when this is in fact, completely incorrect. The US government uses networks completely disconnected from the internet to conduct its real business, as posted repeatedly on slashdot. The fact that people still believe that US governments public websites and points of presence are anything more than public relations has not been keeping pace. But go ahead, mod "insightful" and "interesting" because the post makes a "jab" at the US.

      For the rest of the world who isnt so spun up in anti-US fervor to see what the real problem is.... Vladamirs Putins political party is heavily involved in supporting "youth" organizations which can act for the state, without the state getting any stains on its hands. This may be one of those instances of ultra-nationalists, who have been backed by the state, who act "independently" for the interests of the home nation. While it is irresponsible of the Russian government to allow this type of activity to go on, it is certainly not against their best interests.

      --
      20th century Marxism is not progress...
    3. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean the NIPRNet and SIPRNet? Those are for the Department of Defense.

      As for the regular US government, almost all of their work involves the Internet. Losing access to email and the web would cripple the US government. Including the Department of Defense, since while all classified information goes over the aforementioned secure networks, a lot of the actual work occurs over the regular Internet since it's easier to actually use. Sure, the soldiers in the field would be able to continue dieing for a vague war on terror without the Internet, but the generals and civilian leadership back in the US would be unable to do anything except send email to soldiers.

      And, of course, everything that isn't related to killing people runs over the regular Internet and would be crippled.

    4. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Baltic, not Balkan champ.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    5. Re:Yes, yes, and... by polymeris · · Score: 2, Informative

      Estonia I can almost forgive, as they're relatively poor and didn't have much time to go from Soviet-era attitudes to something saner. They should still have done more.

      Estonia is doing some interesting things online. They seem to have progressed from that Soviet era attitude you mention.

    6. Re:Yes, yes, and... by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      For the rest of the world who isnt so spun up in anti-US fervor to see what the real problem is....

      He's talking to you, Bob.

    7. Re:Yes, yes, and... by emilper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While it is irresponsible of the Russian government to allow this type of activity to go on, it is certainly not against their best interests.

      well, if the high-tech and web savvy Estonians were not able to block the attacks, or, according to the pdf report, even accurately pinpoint the origin of the attack, how could Putin's government do that, except by cutting Russia off the internet or implementing over night a clone of the Chinese FireWall?

      How about some Russians being angry about the whole monument business, and some wise guys taking advantage of that anger to help foster a "nation under siege" and do some nation-building at home ? The government of Russia itself is not innocent of this kind of tactics, proof being the last spate of "patriotic" movies, or the "Brat" series, all of them quite nauseously xenophobic ...

      If the argument used is: the Russians were responsible because the attacks came from Russia, how about dropping all packets arriving from the network blocks assigned to Russia? Not the ideal situation, but at least it will allow your citizen use their online banking accounts or pay their taxes. Or maybe not all attacks originated from Russia, in which case you don't really know who did it.

      How would it be in the interest of the Russian government to appear to the world as a bully? If they wanted to harm any of the Baltic states they could have arranged an "accident" on the pipes that supply them with gas ... They did not hesitate to cut the gas supply of Ukraine, with whom they have much closer and friendly ties.

      This whole Russia-bashing is quite annoying. First, the cold war ended 18 years ago, and hands were shaken, cheeks were kissed, TV shows with USA and SU children holding hands were aired, promises were made that it's a peace without winners or losers, Russia let everybody go their way without much opposition and I personally saw Moskva 1 TV channel (was able to watch it because I lived just across the SU border at that time) arranging to show hot female teens saying stuff that would be unimaginable in USA or any nice Western European country, namely "For me Russia means those that want to stay".

      Second, the cold war did not end because the economy of SU was in collapse or anything like this, the way those political analysts, who in 1989 were predicting the survival of the SU for the next 100 years and inventing terms such as "otomanization", are now clamoring. SU economy was in quite a poor shape, but that was the shape the SU economy was ever since 1917. The collapse began about 1991-1992, when a economy that previously functioned as a single company suddenly was split into a myriad of smaller companies that used to function under central command with their resources directed by the central planning offices and calculated to the milligram, and now did not have the staff, the know-how and the resource buffer to compete against each other. The cold war ended because the Brejnevites and the other leaders of the party wanted to legalize their privileged status, and this happened not only in SU, but in all of the Eastern Europe: just take the Top 500 list of "captains of industry" from any country you like and tabulate it against former "Foreign Trade" officials, local party leaders, diplomats etc. The match would not be perfect, fortunately, but you'll be surprised how many positives you'll find, and how few of the former members of the state apparatus in the Communist governments were left outside. If anybody still imagines that a handful of dissidents that in July 1989 were in prison or home arrest managed to topple the Communist regimes, that person is rather naive, since s/he believes that a state apparatus with complete control over the life of its citizen managed fell to the anger of the righteous.

      Third, what happens right now is that Russia is pushed towards a "Weimar" scenario, with native entrepreneurs of violence doi

    8. Re:Yes, yes, and... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      And, of course, everything that isn't related to killing people runs over the regular Internet and would be crippled.

      Oh well thats alright then... the military can get on with its core business.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    9. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know several people who participated in the attack - I'm not connected to hacker underground but they are. They say that almost all people they know that participated in this attack also dislike Putin and his regime.

      It doesn't take an 'ultranationalist' in Russia to protest against the destruction of war memorials - Russia lost 30 million people in WWII (that's about 50 times more than USA lost in WWII).

      Personally, I see this as an evidence of how easy is to wage electronic 'guerrilla warfare'.

    10. Re:Yes, yes, and... by locketine · · Score: 1

      Did you hear about the Microsoft Word exploit that potentially garnered top secret data from the pentagon a few months back? Also, the networks you're referring to were just recently released from the federal court order that had demanded they stay offline. I doubt it will be more than a year before they are accessible from the net. You'd also be interested to know that Estonia has one of the most advanced civil networking infrastructures on the planet. The US government is not prepared for this kind of attack.

      --
      Think globally but act within local variable scope.
    11. Re:Yes, yes, and... by jd · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You will also no doubt recall that these were found infected by malware that had been transferred from unclassified networks. What difference does an airwall make when it's being run by an airhead?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    12. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well if they didn't put thiomersal and ethyl-mercury in as "preservatives" then maybe people would be more keen. That and the fact that the medical industry has never had a good reputation for honesty.

    13. Re:Yes, yes, and... by jd · · Score: 1
      It doesn't take an 'ultranationalist' in Russia to protest against the destruction of war memorials - Russia lost 30 million people in WWII (that's about 50 times more than USA lost in WWII).

      In the battle for Stalingrad, the Russian side was initially fought by DIY militias, where ordinary citizens would leap on tanks and bung Molotov cocktails down the hatches. (Americans who consider an armed citizenry to be useful against an army would be advised to remember that Stalingrad's citizens only won because the streets were too narrow for the tanks to have a chance and because there were more of them.) After the citizens were defeated by the Germans, the Russian army counter-attacked and slaughtered as many Germans as they could. Surrender was not in the dictionary that day.

      As a wargamer and (amateur) military historian, I am very familiar with not only this battle but many of the others. The Russians very nearly lost against the Germans, only the terrible winter allowed a late rally, and even that was almost not enough. The Russian air force was badly outclassed (even though the Germans had lost most of theirs attacking Britain) and the Russian government was hghly sympathetic to Nazi aims.

      Personally, I see this as an evidence of how easy is to wage electronic 'guerrilla warfare'.

      I agree with you, but would point out that there are enough defences that aren't being widely deployed that it is far easier than it has any right to be.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    14. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Pedrito · · Score: 5, Informative

      Estonia I can almost forgive, as they're relatively poor and didn't have much time to go from Soviet-era attitudes to something saner. They should still have done more. What bothers me much more is that the scorecards for US departments make it clear that the US is even less prepared for a cyberwar than even Balkan castoffs.

      Actually, Estonia isn't very poor. They're a member of the E.U. They're the wealthiest of the Baltic States and their market economy has "one of the highest per capita income levels of Central Europe" (CIA World Factbook). Their unemployment is comparable to the U.S., at just 5.2%. They're actually quite modern. Most of their population files tax returns online. Does that sound like a poverty-struck backwards nation to you?

      There's nothing very Soviet about them, really. They speak their own language, Estonian, which is quite similar to Finnish. Estonia and Finland have very close ties, culturally and financially.

      You're clearly thinking of some other Estonia.

    15. Re:Yes, yes, and... by sir+fer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Germany during the 20s with the "les boches payeront" (if you don't know what it means, google it, it's about war compensations). what is this "google" of which you speak? If you want me to learn something you had better damned well hand it to me on a silver platter and not expect me to do any tedious "reading"!

      obligatory- in SU, google searches you!

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    16. Re:Yes, yes, and... by niiler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The war memorial was moved to a Russian cemetery, not destroyed. This was far more appropriate considering that most Estonians felt that Stalin was FAR worse than Hitler. Sheesh, 10% of the Estonian adult population was deported to gulags and death camps by the Russians. Under the Nazis, if you weren't Roma, gay, or Jewish, you were OK. [I'm not saying that the Nazis were nice folks. On the contrary, they were horrid too.]

      So the bear rescued the rabbit from the falcon, the bear still tried eating the rabbit. It's either disingenuous or ignorant to claim that the rabbit ought to be thanking the bear.

    17. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 2, Informative

      DoE uses those networks as well. I did an internship with a DoE contractor and as part of my gig, created an internal informational site for the government contractors there consisting mostly of stuff pulled off of Wikipedia and other public sources to 'create awareness'. Fact of the matter is, the same 'tubes' used as the infrastructure for the public side and SIPRNet arethe same, just that everything is heavily encrypted.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    18. Re:Yes, yes, and... by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Naturally, it is the spread of rampant capitalism, infrastructure to the lowest bidder, maintenance to the lowest bidder, profits today, cost are someone else's problem tomorrow, after the bonuses have been paid out.

      Even real oddities can occur ie. when you charge for traffic across a network, DDOS attacks can prove very profitable to those selling bandwidth and it would actually cost them money without any financial return to stop them.

      So it requires legislation to force privatised infrastructure providers to secure the network against hostile attacks, they will of course voluntarily spend inordinate amounts of money to prevent people stealing bandwidth but when it comes to securing their customers from attack they will only do so if they are forced.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:Yes, yes, and... by bob.appleyard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the US, it was all about "mercury based preservatives" causing untold woe and suffering.

      In the UK, it was all "oh it'll give you autism."

      Both claims were basically specious, and they were both cut from the same cloth -- luddism. There is, and has been since pretty much their inception, a staunch group of idiots that want to do away with vaccines, God only knows why.

      I'm beyond cynical when it comes to the behaviour of pharmaceutical companies ("social anxiety," anyone?), but you're basically invoking a conspiracy theory in an attempt to discredit epidemiology. If you're going to attack a fundamentally sound discipline, you're going to have to do better than misunderstandings of chemistry and "oh, that nasty Big Pharma wants to kill you" rhetoric.

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    20. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 3, Funny

      > You're clearly thinking of some other Estonia.

      He must've been thinking of Elbonia.

    21. Re:Yes, yes, and... by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

      ..."oh, that nasty Big Pharma wants to kill you" rhetoric.

      Well chaaa... dead people make lousy customers. Sick people on the other hand...

      --
      What?
    22. Re:Yes, yes, and... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, when you get infected with a virus it can't phone home. That's worth a lot. (Not enough, maybe, but a lot.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    23. Re:Yes, yes, and... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For the rest of the world who isnt so spun up in anti-US fervor to see what the real problem is.... Vladamirs Putins political party is heavily involved in supporting "youth" organizations which can act for the state, without the state getting any stains on its hands.
      You're not keeping up with the news. The "youth organizations" had one sole purpose - their members were supposed to clash on the streets with opposition supporters after the elections, if their results would be disputed so much that the people would go out to the streets (as it happened in Ukraine and Georgia earlier). Now that elections are past (and were relatively quiet), Kremlin has little use for all the skinheads they've hired, so most "youth orgs" have been basically told to go screw themselves.

      Oh, and you really do not need any sort of government backing to mount a pretty massive cyber-attack on Estonia here. Most Russians hate the Baltic countries (thanks to all the Russian TV propaganda about suppressing the Russian minority and glorious marches of SS veterans that happen there), there are plenty of semi-serious jokes about "our tanks in Riga (/Vilnius/Tallinn)" etc. All that was needed was a spark, and the events in Estonia gave it. I would be surprised if the "youth org" members didn't heavily participate (for one, because they are strongly brainwashed), or that there was tacit government support for that. But it's hardly organized by the Russian state as a whole.

    24. Re:Yes, yes, and... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This whole Russia-bashing is quite annoying. First, the cold war ended 18 years ago, and hands were shaken, cheeks were kissed, TV shows with USA and SU children holding hands were aired, promises were made that it's a peace without winners or losers, Russia let everybody go their way without much opposition and I personally saw Moskva 1 TV channel (was able to watch it because I lived just across the SU border at that time) arranging to show hot female teens saying stuff that would be unimaginable in USA or any nice Western European country, namely "For me Russia means those that want to stay".
      The cold war ended 18 years ago, indeed. A second one began in 2000, with the change of power.

      If anybody still imagines that a handful of dissidents that in July 1989 were in prison or home arrest managed to topple the Communist regimes, that person is rather naive, since s/he believes that a state apparatus with complete control over the life of its citizen managed fell to the anger of the righteous.
      By the time the USSR has collapsed, it didn't have "complete control over the life of its citizens" for a looong time. It started in Brezhnev's time already, Gorbachev and his ilk just sped up the process by giving up the reins completely.

      In 2001 Putin himself was hinting about Russia getting into NATO
      Russia has never, ever, seriously considered joining NATO, even during the more Western-friendly Yeltsin times. "Hinting" is a stretch, and well, Belarus' Lukashenko also "hints" things like that sometimes - usually when he wants something from his friend Putin, and doesn't get it as quickly as he likes. It's hard to take these things seriously.
    25. Re:Yes, yes, and... by capologist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the Russian government was hghly sympathetic to Nazi aims. Wasn't it a Nazi aim to wipe out Communism? Didn't they see Communism as a giant Jewish conspiracy that posed a great threat to the Aryan race?
    26. Re:Yes, yes, and... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't take an 'ultranationalist' in Russia to protest against the destruction of war memorials
      It does take a rather brainwashed person to see all the lies about "destruction" on the state-owned TV and believe it without double-checking. Russian TV channels were feeding not only propaganda, but outright lies, even showing a picture of the statue's feet standing on the pedestal, the rest apparently torn off (the pic was later found out to be photoshopped). Meanwhile, everyone who had been tracking the events on the Net - and not just RuNet (which is also overwhemingly jingoistic) but elsewhere, knew what was actually going on. Some people were still offended even by the move, of course, but I doubt this would be strong enough reason for such "protests".
    27. Re:Yes, yes, and... by jd · · Score: 1

      I'll correct that: the aims the Nazis let the Russians know about, prior to the Blitzkreig manoever.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    28. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So has Slashdot received a Nation Security Letter yet requesting your IP address? If you really do know people who participated in this attack than you are basically admitting that you know living breathing terrorists and perhaps you have information of interest.

      Looks like you have been posting everyday or so for the last week, if your posts dry up maybe we could send you a post card:

      Attn: Cyberax (705495)
      Guantanamo Bay Naval Base
      Cuba

      *note to self: don't reveal my involvement in dangerous secrete terrorist cyber war activities to Cyberax

    29. Re:Yes, yes, and... by capologist · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hitler was very open about his attitude toward Communism long before Operation Barbarossa. He wrote about it in Mein Kampf.

    30. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      30 million The difference is that Russia didn't count losses in the same way that the anyone else did in that time. To Mother Russia, it was a number. To just about every other country it meant the life of a soldier.
      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    31. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      one of the highest per capita income levels of Central Europe Hey! I have seen Euro-trip! They might be the wealthiest of the Baltic States, but I bet you could still buy a car with the change in your pocket!

      Its humor, not flamebait.
      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    32. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WWII begun on September 1, 1941. Allies nazi and soviet troops occupied Poland.

    33. Re:Yes, yes, and... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I won't be surprised if there's a very small percentage of the population who are more sensitive to mercury.

      In my opinion I think the safety levels for something that's compulsory for _everybody_ should be higher than medical treatment that's elective.

      For treatment that's elective it's not too bad if 0.1% have serious problems - since you only take it if the doctor thinks you're sick, and there's a good chance that it'll help.

      Whereas if you have 1 million _required_ to take it, even if only 0.01% have serious problems, that's 100 who weren't sick before who are now sick.

      Given what we know about mercury compounds, if it was me in charge, I wouldn't feel so good about injecting everyone with a mercury compound, even if 100 out of 100 humans have no problems with it, and 1000 out of 1000 mice have no problems.

      --
    34. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Lincolnshire+Poacher · · Score: 1

      > Sheesh, 10% of the Estonian adult population was deported to
      > gulags and death camps by the Russians.

      Stalin was Georgian, not Russian. As was the majority of his retinue.

      If you're going to tar an entire national group, be accurate.

    35. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I see this as an evidence of how easy is to wage electronic 'guerrilla warfare'."

      If it was easy, I'd think it would be done far more often. It's harder than real guerrilla warfare because those waging it need to have a fair amount of technical knowledge in order to make the tools and carry out the attack. The tools to carry out a real guerrilla attack can be made with far simpler technologies invented seven or so decades ago.

    36. Re:Yes, yes, and... by JoeInnes · · Score: 1

      Actually, Estonia are not as poor as their Baltic neighbours, and are surprisingly Westernised in terms of their attitudes. Estonia have no excuse for allowing this sort of thing to happen. The only possible excuse is that their neighbours are considerably poorer than them, which has perhaps resulted in bottlenecks coming into the country, which are totally unavoidable.

      Also, please, learn the difference between Balkan and Baltic. Baltic is north-east Europe, countries such as Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia. The Balkans are another area completely, with countries such as Bosnia, Albania, Serbia, Kosovo, and so on, in south eastern Europe. The Baltic states are pretty stable, whereas the Balkans are not.

    37. Re:Yes, yes, and... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      You may want to read Winston Churchill's take on Communism - old Winnie was none too keen on the Jews himself.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    38. Re:Yes, yes, and... by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      The racial makeup of Stalins henchmen changed over time - quite dramatically. The Cheka (the first incarnation of the KGB) was principally staffed by people of Latvian and Polish descent until the mid-1930s when it was purged for the first time. The next "generation" of operatives had a much more mixed ethnic background. The Politburo itself contained a veritable mix of nationalities from Russians like Molotov and Voroshilov to Ukrainians like Kruschev (even Beria was from a different ethnic group to Stalin, albeit one that is classed as a Georgian sub-group). This is to be expected, as the revolutionaries (at least during their slightly more idealistic phase) were internationalist in outlook. As for the Georgians in Stalins immediate circle, with the exception of Beria they were as likely to end up with a bullet in the back of the head or in a Gulag as anyone else. The assumption that "Soviet citizen" means "Russian" or that "Stalin henchman" means "Georgian" is a somewhat gross misconception.

      A good book on this subject is Stalin and His Hangmen, which includes a fascinating account of how the heart condition of a former Stalin favourite was deliberately mistreated. This mistreatment was on Stalins orders, but ten years later it was used as "evidence" for the doctors purge that was mercifully cut short by Stalins death.

    39. Re:Yes, yes, and... by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Those youth organisations still have a use. They were recently employed to picket the premises and harass the employees of the British Council (the Wikipedia article includes information on the Russian difficulties. This is part of an attempt to intimidate the British government in the ongoing diplomatic shenanigans surrounding the murder of Alexander Litvinenko.

    40. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about looking at the map before putting Estonia in the Balkan area?

    41. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germans can't count their casualties either. The number of German burials on the territory of *former USSR only* surpasses Nazi propaganda reports on all seats of WW2 including Africa, Atlantic, Western Front, Poland and Yugoslavia.

    42. Re:Yes, yes, and... by maxume · · Score: 1

      The counter argument is that 100 cases of autism are better than 100,000 cases of mumps or measles (those numbers are made up to make the point that vaccination is not done in a vacuum, not in an attempt to justify the current outcomes, which I don't know).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    43. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but the monument was moved and not destroyed.

    44. Re:Yes, yes, and... by catman · · Score: 1

      Off by two years. It was 1939. France and the British Empire declared war on Germany on Sept. 3. You're thinking Pearl Harbour, Dec. 7 1941?

    45. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe the Balkans extend that far North... you maybe meant the Baltic?

    46. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Placido · · Score: 1

      >> The cold war ended 18 years ago, indeed. A second one began in January 20th 2001, with the change of power.

      Fixed that for ya.

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
    47. Re:Yes, yes, and... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Estonia has nothing to do with the Balkans. It's one of the Baltic states and it was part of the Soviet Union itself. And it's not poor, either.

    48. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Larry_The_Canary · · Score: 1

      And in Canada it was Mercury preservatives will give you autism....

      It's not a single vaccine you should be worried about, because the amount of mercury in a single vaccine is nothing, really. It the cumulative effects of multiple vaccines.

    49. Re:Yes, yes, and... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      If those 100 cases are avoidable, then it's more a matter of how to avoid them and how much it costs.

      And perhaps there are other people damaged just not as severely.

      After all, apparently a lot of people voted Bush back in for a second term ;). Just kidding :).

      --
    50. Re:Yes, yes, and... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Oh, not at all. Don't think Bush made much difference when it comes to US-Russia relations. The low was hit during Clinton already, when US has campaigned for and lead the bombings of Serbia and invasion of Kosovo - Russians are traditionally very protective about Serbs. Everything that Bush has done is really peanuts by comparison; though after Kosovo, pretty much every target the Americans chose would automatically be considered a potential friend here - so yes, Iraq, Iran, you name it, we're going to sell weapons to them especially if you invade them - just to spite you...

    51. Re:Yes, yes, and... by jd · · Score: 1

      Ah, but could Stalin read?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    52. Re:Yes, yes, and... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Well of course you want to do whatever minimizes problems overall, but the point stands that from a public health perspective, a vaccine with small problems is much better than a disease with large problems. Life, averaged across society, would be much, much, much worse without vaccines.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    53. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but Russian channels reported that the memorial was being moved to the cemetary.

      It doesn't make a difference - it's no less offensive.

    54. Re:Yes, yes, and... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      What excuse does anyone have, today, for being vulnerable to this? Money. Everything you talked about costs money. More links, new equipment, more staff, etc.

      Estonia I can almost forgive, as they're relatively poor It's not like they need the money for public works, energy costs, FOOD. The reality is that expensive network equipment is a relatively low priority for most nations, and rightly so.

    55. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Well, I think I'm well outside the reach of US-hired goons (I'm in Ukraine). ...wait... Someone's knocking at my door.

    56. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      You also need a cause to wage a guerrilla warfare for it.

      As for tools - they are easy to get. And there's a surprising number of people who can use it.

    57. Re:Yes, yes, and... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      The US government uses networks completely disconnected from the internet to conduct its real business, as posted repeatedly on slashdot. This is incredibly wrong. The US military uses a disconnected network "SIPRNet" for SOME classified information and communication between military equipment (tanks reporting their position to the command center). That's it. Every other part of the US government, like the IRS and the FBI, use the public internet as do all local and state agencies. Yes, the IRS transfers your tax data on the public internet.

      Vladamirs Putins political party is heavily involved in supporting "youth" organizations which can act for the state, You are right in thinking this was probably a staged attack by the Russian government.

    58. Re:Yes, yes, and... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      well, if the high-tech and web savvy Estonians were not able to block the attacks, or, according to the pdf report, even accurately pinpoint the origin of the attack, how could Putin's government do that Because Putin's cronies organized the protests and cyber attack.

      How would it be in the interest of the Russian government to appear to the world as a bully? Remember how Putin poisoned one of his detractors with polonium, and exotic isotope used only by Russian Intelligence which ends in a very painful death? Putin obviously WANTED his critics to know that he was willing to hunt them down and kill them wherever they are. He compares himself to STALIN, for God's sake.

      This whole Russia-bashing is quite annoying. It's not "Russia-bashing" it's "Putin-bashing", or even "neo-communist nationalist-bashing" because that's what we're attacking, not the Russian people. If I wanted to bash the Russian people I'd bash for for supporting a nutcase like Putin.

      Second, the cold war did not end because the economy of SU was in collapse ... The collapse began about 1991-1992, when a economy that previously functioned as a single company suddenly was split into a myriad of smaller companies You're contradicting yourself. The SU collapsed largely due to economic pressures, both internal and external, on RUSSIA which made Russia unable to maintain control of the satellite states (as you describe) and that lost of revenue led the the complete collapse of the Soviet system. Much of this pressure was external. Soviet citizens weren't doing so much WORSE (as you pointed out, things and be bad for a long time) but they came to realize that the Soviet system was never going to IMPROVE economic conditions, certainly not to the level of the West. Decrying the evils of "Western materialism" can only last so long when you don't have clothes on your back or food on your plate.

      the deluded Western governments imagining that they won the cold war and they are entitled to a "winner takes all" attitude, not unlike what happened in Germany The "deluded Western governments" haven't imposed anything even remotely like the sanctions placed on Germany post-WWI on Russia. All Russia/SU lost was territory they seized through force. And the West didn't "take it way from them", they declared independence. Most of the current criticism against Russia is because Russia is moving AWAY from democracy and because they are selling arms and weapons technology indiscriminately.

    59. Re:Yes, yes, and... by medlefsen · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that many countries have long since banned the use of mercury in vaccines to no effect on autism or anything else for that matter. The whole thing sounds like a case of post hoc ergo propter hoc. Vaccines are given before signs of autism show up and grieving parents look for something blame.

    60. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

      I read about this youth groups who take the name of Nashi, meaning "Ours!". It's supposed to be an extremely nationalist and Putin-oriented (or hailing) group with military/fascist trademarks akin to that of Hitler Jugend (yes it should be said out loud).

      Having read the article I confronted a pretty high-ranking (and democratic) Russian professor I was working with at the time with this image, and he merely scoffed. "No one takes them seriously." Then again, this person could have overlooked them because this person was working on a bigger perspective.
      To that: I'm not so afraid of the youth organization itself (there are neo-fascists in different clothing all over the globe) as I am of what it might signify. Still, it's too early to say whether it will 'blow over' taking into account that Putin has replaced his own hard-line with a mild-mannered, western-friendly puppet to ease the transition (that many researchers as well as Russians do believe is taking place). In an interview Putin did say that moving from the post-Soviet era to a modern democracy requires a period of strict, authoritarian rule.

      As for the public opinion of the USA, good on you. Even though many (if not most) of those posts are completely beside the point, they are a clear expression of sentiment. How did the New World, with all its great and marvelous ideas, suddenly become so very Old and abominable?

    61. Re:Yes, yes, and... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      > Because Putin's cronies organized the protests and cyber attack.

      FYI: There was no need to force anyone out to the streets then, so organization was purely on the level of "We meetup at 10 AM".

      > Remember how Putin poisoned one of his detractors with polonium

      That guy was one of the LEAST known people. Killing Berezovsky would have been more effective, while generating same amount of publicity.
      Sidenote: My problem is why the hell wasn't anyone investigating HOW a lethal amount polonium got into UK in the first place. I don't care that a former KGB agent(the people that swore to give their lives for their country) dies, I need to know what is done to prevent any such polonium "leaks" from EVER happening.

      > If I wanted to bash the Russian people I'd bash for for supporting a nutcase like Putin.

      Often this translates into lose understanding of what is anti-Russian and what is anti-Putin. I've seen this happen too often.

      > You're contradicting yourself. The SU collapsed largely due to economic pressures, both internal and external, ....

      OMG. You talk like you were there... You can't imagine how many minds in US I have changed by telling the REALITY.
      Those external pressures were negligible to the people that pulled down SU. And that is a long story...
      Just the moral: Do not attribute fall of SU to US, attribute to SU people.

      > Most of the current criticism against Russia is because Russia is moving AWAY from democracy
      A: In Russia meaning democracy = anarchy.
      B: The result is the first head of state in history(and I mean from the 9th century) of Russia that abides by the constitution!
      C: Thanks to the drunk Yeltsin, Russia was held as a joke state. And do you actually consider that if you interact with someone in a demeaning way they would take after you? Demeaning is what the people of Russia saw during the 90s.

      > because they are selling arms and weapons technology indiscriminately.

      Oh no, they are selling weapons very strategically. Do you know how far is Iran from Russian border? How many Shia Muslims are there in Russia?
      Their strategy is simple, keep the nut-job US president from attacking Iran and creating a hot spot at Russian borders. You know the way that Iraq turned out....
      And they are doing it right for once... Same as US did forever: support anyone that will guarantee stability at their borders.

    62. Re:Yes, yes, and... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      FYI:
        The reason why those protests occurred, is that Estonians did it at their own discretion bu passing a local directive. The main problem was they they didn't even put an effort to communicate it to the veteran organization.
        I put blame for the protests on both sides, one overreacted the other thought they can do anything they want.

    63. Re:Yes, yes, and... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Hate to burst your bubble, but Estonia's economic bubble is showing fractures...

    64. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I see a big difference between relocation and destruction. Go and be offended all you want, but to call them equivalent sounds like pointless whining and petty emotionalism to me.

    65. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      No.

      Estonians destroyed the war memorial by moving the statue to another place. Also, it was done several days before the May 9 ("Victory Day") to add even more insult.

    66. Re:Yes, yes, and... by capologist · · Score: 1
      Here's an excerpt:

      http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv2ch14.html

      And so we National Socialists consciously draw a line beneath the foreign policy tendency of our pre-War period. We take up where we broke off six hundred years ago. We stop the endless German movement to the south and west, and turn our gaze toward the land in the east. At long last we break of the colonial and commercial policy of the pre-War period and shift to the soil policy of the future.

      If we speak of soil in Europe today, we can primarily have in mind only Russia and her vassal border states.

      Here Fate itself seems desirous of giving us a sign. By handing Russia to Bolshevism, it robbed the Russian nation of that intelligentsia which previously brought about and guaranteed its existence as a state. For the organization of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race. Numerous mighty empires on earth have been created in this way. Lower nations led by Germanic organizers and overlords have more than once grown to be mighty state formations and have endured as long as the racial nudeus of the creative state race maintained itself. For centuries Russia drew nourishment from this Germanic nucleus of its upper leading strata. Today it can be regarded as almost totally exterminated and extinguished. It has been replaced by the Jew. Impossible as it is for the Russian by himself to shake off the yoke of the Jew by his own resources, it is equally impossible for the Jew to maintain the mighty empire forever. He himself is no element of organization, but a ferment of decomposition. The Persian I empire in the east is ripe for collapse. And the end of Jewish rule in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a state. (Note: When he speaks of the rule of the Jew, he is referring to Communism.)

      (Note #2: When he refers to "The Persian empire in the east," I have elsewhere seen it translated as "The giant empire in the east.")
    67. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The truth that I see is that you people are desperately searching for reasons to be insulted.

      That is the only plausible explaination that I see for people that see relocation as destruction.

    68. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      You see, if it was 'just a relocation' than a public outcry about it from a Russian-speaking population would have been enough to stop it. It was destruction of a _symbol_ and Estonians themselves understand it quite well.

      You see, Estonia is openly Russophobic - a quarter of Russians live there as 'aliens' (without rights to vote, etc.) even though they were born in Estonia (while it was a part of USSR). It was another reason the destruction of the memorial had such a great effect.

      Another interesting fact: a purely _voluntary_ boycott of Estonian goods which followed the destruction of the memorial resulted in e450 million loss for Estonia. That's just to give you some perspective about feelings of Russians.

    69. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That's hardly convincing. Just because a lot of people feel a certain way doesn't make it so. In this case, all that makes them is emotionally immature people. Letting the emotions get in the way to the point that relocation is equated as destruction, as well as the examples you gave, are basically examples of a people that just can't let go. It doesn't even look like it's really about WWII memorials, that was over six decades ago now, now it's just a bitter grudge.

    70. Re:Yes, yes, and... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Would you be offended or would you consider it a good real-estate deal?

      Or another example: what if someone decides to build a brothel on the site of WTC towers?

      "It doesn't even look like it's really about WWII memorials, that was over six decades ago now, now it's just a bitter grudge."

      You don't UNDERSTAND the impact of WWII. Jews still talk about the Holocaust and Russia lost 6-8 times more people in that war.

    71. Re:Yes, yes, and... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but Russian channels reported that the memorial was being moved to the cemetary.
      They've started doing so after they've been caught lying. Before that, they were foaming at the mouth about how the move was extremely destructive (on RTR, it was told that, in order to move the monument, it was "cut into pieces" - that's when the photoshopped legs-alone-on-pedestal pic was showed on TV; here's another such article on NTV web site - notice how it also mentions that the monument has been "cut into parts").

      It doesn't make a difference - it's no less offensive.
      A monument in the centre of the city was treated as a symbol of Soviet domination, and rightly so. The monument has been moved into an appropriate environment, a Russian military cemetery, where those who are willing to pay their respects to it can do so. What is offensive about it? We move such monuments in Russia all the time - as you surely remember, there was the case of doing so in Moscow right during the whole Tallinn story, and that was done for much more mundane reasons - to make room for a building...
  5. Expert? by lambent · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sorry, but ... wait, no I'm not.

    Gadi Evron, while undeniably prolific, is questionably informed. Take what he has to say with a grain of salt, and don't for a second believe there's anything more involved here than using well-known industry best-practices for evaluating vulnerable infrastructure and dealing with this type of traffic.

    We now return to your regularly scheduled cross-post flame-fest between nanog and full-disclosure.

    1. Re:Expert? by tyler.willard · · Score: 1

      And why, exactly, should anyone take your word over his?

    2. Re:Expert? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Don't take either's word - read their words, and then form your own conclusion. It is clear from Gadi Evron's document that he has very little useful to say. Someone being derogatory about him and it because of what they read within is certainly someone with a better grasp of fact and logic than the laughably-titled "expert" Gadi Evron.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    3. Re:Expert? by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      So, you think EuSecWest should let Muniz present? If n3td3v is right (and ofcourse he is) this could destroy the internet (I heard he has already put in an application for MI5)

  6. Too bad. by cdrguru · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Internet as it stands today is a consequences-free zone. Nations can't "do" anything about such attacks because there are no effective ways to conclusively track them back to individuals or even organizations. Even if there was, how much is some official going to do in China when handed a report of some kind of attack against some other country's computers?

    As continuously pointed out, an IP address does not identify an individual. Today, with today's laws, unless you leave clear tracks to other forms of identification just having an IP address does not connect a deed with an individual. You can threaten, harass, and, yes, DDoS, with impunity. I don't see this changing anytime soon.

    This pretty much means that any real online presence lives or dies by how much they draw attention to themselves and how motivated the attackers are. Estonia sounds like they were particularly vulnerable with little in the way of offline backup for basic services. This is not true in the US today, but it could easily be that way tomorrow. Could a group of disgruntled folks cripple government services in the US? Maybe. Given the current climate with laws, enforcement and international cooperation, there is no way that anyone outside the US would ever be prosecuted unless they bragged about what they did.

    1. Re:Too bad. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If they ahve an IP while the event is happening, they can find the computer and get who is using it, or was using it at that time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Too bad. by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, you can't rely on that.

      IPs can be faked, and trying to track down a specific IP across uncooperative ISPs and political borders is a fools errand.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:Too bad. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Investigations into this are not only done behind a PC doing a whois and a traceroute. They are being done by going into the field and see what is going on. Who gave the orders and so on.

      The trace routes and so on a a mere start that could catch some small fish. It should not be anything else and it could even mean that nothing technical is used.
      The main investigation will be happening on a complete different level. That means on a more social level.

      Don't think you can solve a social problem with a technical solution.

      A link could be that somebody from the Kremlin started to finance a group of crackers after the crackers proposed the idea. It could be just that. The difficulty then lies in to prove that the financing is directly linked to the proposal of the attack. That means more investigations that have not much to do with the actual attack.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  7. I was close to participation by RCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember how I was also enraged upon hearing about Estonian plans and yes, I wanted to join the resistance (or "cyber-war" as they called it immediately in the West). But a bit later when emotions calmed down I changed my mind, because it all was immature and not that effective anyway (and yes, reading about the events from Estonian POV helped me to get calm, too).

    Let God/History/Nature/whatever be the judge for Estonians, not me. If they prefer Nazis over Soviets, so be it. They made their choice.

    1. Re:I was close to participation by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I never really understand when someone gets enraged when a different country does something considered an insult by another. These aren't personal insults. They're insults to a government, often a past government. Ie, US "patriots" foaming at the mouth when France won't be a lap dog, or someplace objects to expanding military bases, etc. It makes no sense.

      For Estonia, it's their country, they can do whatever they want with some statue that they never asked for. If moving the statue means anything to the Russians, it should have meant some sort of introspection about why they're not seen as the glorious savior of eastern europe. Why the anger? I honestly don't understand it, except that most people growing up in the Soviet Union were fed propaganda and haven't learned to see things from other viewpoints.

      Such as the viewpoint that this statue was never seen as a "war memorial" to the ethnic Estonians, but was a symbol of occupation and Russification, and had become a flash point for conflicts. If anyone was insulted, it was the Soviet occupation. Do modern Russians still fondly love the Stalinist era? Should Germans become enranged if someone tears down a memorial put up by Nazis? Do Russians still honestly believe Estonia is fascist, that they loved the Nazis? Given a choice between Stalinist brutality and Nazi brutality, why are Russians still pissed off that they weren't the first choice?

      And yes, I am equating Stalinist excesses to Nazi excesses. I don't believe praising the lesser of two evils.

    2. Re:I was close to participation by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are Russians (ethnic Russians, not Russian Federation citizens) in Estonia, and Estonian government from the very beginning established a policy of excluding them from pretty much everything by denying them citizenship on a bogus premise of "not speaking Estonian well enough".

      Promoting Nazi organizations and removing the war monument from a public square was seen by them, and Russians outside Estonia, as a continuation of the same policy, revealing its true political goals.

      So far the best excuse for siding with Nazi the Estonian nationalists presented was along the lines "but Nazi did not kill ethnic Estonians, so they are alright for us".

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    3. Re:I was close to participation by RCL · · Score: 1

      That's because they don't just dislike government: they dislike Russians as a nation. The memorial does not depict authorities, it is a "commoner", a soldier like millions.

      About sympathies: yes, both Nazi and Stalinists enjoy some support in their respective countries. But even people who do not support those regimes may still be emotionally linked to German or Russian side, just because they share common ethnicity and/or nationality. I remember talking to one young German who said: "thinking about WW II makes me sad, because we lost - but OTOH, had we won, it would be even worse".

      Nowadays Russians do not feel themselves responsible for the deeds of the past, they don't often know POV of other nations and disregard all accusations as propaganda, just because "we're not animals, we couldn't be that evil - they say that because they want to humiliate us". And indeed, quite often the accusations you hear are so wild that they discredit the western opinion in Russian eyes altogether.

      And also do not forget, most of todays 20- or 30-years olds have been growing up in late USSR, pretty different from one of Stalinist era. What was an "evil empire" for you, was a peaceful and calm (compared to post-Soviet conflicts) realm for us. Wherever we're now, in Israel or in States, we still cannot fully accept your "evil empire" image: it was our childhood, it was bright, everything was easy and everyone was peaceful. That's the USSR Russians (and other ex-Soviet emigrees) remember and that's the USSR they long for.

    4. Re:I was close to participation by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are Russians (ethnic Russians, not Russian Federation citizens) in Estonia, True. The vast majority of ethnic Russians in Estonia though immigrated during the Soviet era, as part of russification and build up of industrialization. Should Estonia be allowed to try and restore a national identity and choose it's own national language?

      So far the best excuse for siding with Nazi the Estonian nationalists presented was along the lines "but Nazi did not kill ethnic Estonians, so they are alright for us". Nazis did kill ethnic Estonians. But the Soviets killed far more. Estonians welcomed the Nazis as liberators because they had been recently forcibly annexed into the USSR and were being repressed. This in no way means they approved of fascism on the whole (though in every nation at the time there were some who did like fascism). Many Estonians, unwilling to side with the Nazis, enlisted in the Finnish army.

      It was only after the war that the Nazis gained the association of being the ultimate evil of all time. The horrors of the holocaust were not very well known at the time, and rumors of it were often dismissed as exaggeration. At the time of the war, the conflict was probably viewed as yet another chapter in an age old tug of war between super powers in Europe.

      There are countries all over Europe who were occupied by the Nazis and who had some population willingly side with the Nazis. Are modern Russians all angry with them also? What are the feelings about Finland, which had a war against the USSR with Nazi support?
    5. Re:I was close to participation by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ethnic Russians who have consistently supported the Estonian independence in Soviet time (before it was actually declared) have all received Estonian citizenship according to the new laws regardless of language knowledge. The rest were either apathetic or outright wanted Estonia to remain in the USSR (essentially, to remain occupied). Why does the new state owe anything, much less citizenship, to the latter two categories?

      It's ironic, really... we hear a lot about how Russians are oppressed in Estonia, and the talking heads in TV often liken it to the Nazis. Yet very few Russians actually bother to leave Estonia for Russia - apparently they are still better off there, even as non-citizens...

    6. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i find this trail of thought incredibly narrow minded - "if they dont like communists they must be fascist."

      those so called cyberattacks against relocating a war monument from a trolleybus station into a war cemetary was obviously caused from such narrow mindedness

    7. Re:I was close to participation by frn123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just a bit of clarification:
      There really is NO promoting Nazi organizations or siding with Nazi in Estonia. Can i ask from where does this false information come from?

      Also the bogus premise of "speaking language x well enough to get citizenship" is needed in the vast majority of European countries (correct me if i'm wrong).

    8. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of the Soviet resettlement policies (not unlike those in Tibet and the West Bank), almost one half of the Estonian population is ethnically Russian. The ethnic Estonian patriots want to turn back the clock and are wishing the Russians away. However, many of the Russians have lived in Estonia for generations already and really have no other home country.

      So at the fall of the Soviet Union, the ethnic Estonians (and a handful of primordial Russians) were declared citizens, while the other half of the population was given the status of permanent residents who'd have to go through the regular naturalization procedures to obtain citizenship. And even though half the population speaks Russian natively, only Estonian is official.

      Most Russians don't really care one way or another, but a sizeable minority of them is wishing for the return of the Soviet Union so they could show the arrogant Estonians their rightful place. The government of the Russian Federation is exploiting and encouraging that sentiment to give headaches to the Estonian government, as the Russian government resents the NATO membership of the former Soviet states.

    9. Re:I was close to participation by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Yet very few Russians actually bother to leave Estonia for Russia - apparently they are still better off there, even as non-citizens... That's not a very sound argument. Just because someone cannot leave their home and become a refugee doesn't have to mean they are better off being where they are...

      I mean, how many Kurds "bothered" to leave Saddam's Iraq, or how many Albanians left Yugoslavia in the 1990s? Armenians in Turkey? Or what about 400,000 Tutsis that were slaughtered by the Hutu folks; you think they didn't move because they were better off dead? Amerindians? The six million Jews, very few of them left Nazi Germany alive...
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    10. Re:I was close to participation by shiznatix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they prefer Nazis over Soviets, so be it. They made their choice.
      Holy shit! You obviously don't understand anything. Nobody liberated Estonia, ever, except for the Estonians themselves linky and linky 2 (granted we got a bit of help from our neighbors). We (I am an Estonian) do NOT prefer Nazis. We just hate both Soviets and Nazis. If there was some crazy Nazi war memorial at the same place it would have been removed as well.

      Also, how in the world is removing a Soviet statue saying "I love Nazis"? Every single year the Russians would gather at the memorial during VE day and get wasted and wave the Soviet flag around. Naturally the Estonians would come by with signs like "During the occupation X amount of people were deported" and whatnot. Then a fight would break out and the cops would have to come stop a small scale riot from breaking out because someone told these idiots the truth. To stop this from escalating we moved the monument. We did not destroy it, we did not desecrate the bodies, we did not cut the statue into pieces as the Durma said, we moved it with full respect for the dead.

      Saying we prefer Nazis is strange. My own family was killed by the Nazis and my grandfather deported to Germany to work in a forced labor camp till the war ended and the guards just disapeard one day. I hate Nazis. I have about 1 or 2 living relatives left in Estonia because of that. But that does not make me a Soviet lover. You don't have to pick a side here, you can hate both.

      Yes, we made our choice. We chose freedom and thats what we have. Don't like it, comrade? Tough.
    11. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Estonia did not choose Nazis over Soviets - Both were really really bad. As far the monument is conserned, it was moved to the military cemetary. It was not destroyed nor removed.

    12. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government isn't "denying citizenship on a bogus premise".

      The law is based on the "ius sanguis" where citizenship is automaticaly granted to the children of a citizen (like in most other European contries and unlike America which is based on "ius soli" granting citizenship to children born on their soil).

      A fairly simple procedure exists for applying for citizenship, which includes a standard test covering Estonian history and being able to speak Estonian at a communicative level (similarly to such procedures in other countries).

      The rules are the same for anyone residing in Estonia (except perhaps EU citizens, where there might be some legal diffrences but they still have to take the test) and don't discriminate in any way against Russians.

    13. Re:I was close to participation by RCL · · Score: 1

      Well, as I said, I read about the events from Estonian POV so I know the details (and about not desecrating bodies as well) - but thanks for providing yet another view on the subject (the more the better). Initially, news available in Russian (including blogs of those living in Estonia) were far more dramatic.

      About preferring Nazis over Soviets: obviously, there are your fellow countrymen who prefer them. So the rumours about pro-Nazi sentiments in Baltic countries are not unfounded.

      And about calling me a comrade: I'm no communist. Actually, despite I'm Russian citizen, I'm not an ethnic Russian as well. I have relatives across the Europe (including Baltic states), so I don't identify myself with single ethnic group. That's why I despise nationalist movements, seeing them no better than "religious wars" about what OS/desktop environment/language is better. The reason why I was willing to participate was because I do respect people who fought the Nazism, not because I want Estonia back to Russia (actually, I don't care - if Europe wants to have itself fragmented into small factions, so be it). And I refrained from participation upon reading more on the subject and finding out that it was more about Russian nationalism than anti-Nazi resistance.

    14. Re:I was close to participation by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      There are countries all over Europe who were occupied by the Nazis and who had some population willingly side with the Nazis.

      Including large number of Soviet citizens, including ethnic Russians. The SS raised a number of Ukrainian divisions, and large numbers of Don Cossacks, Azeris and other nationalities fought against the Red Army in more ad-hoc units. This is not to forget the large number of non-combat personnel that were employed in anti-partisan and police roles. The Nazis ideology limited their willingness to use those dissatisfied with Soviet rule on a larger scale, which was a major mistake - many Soviet citizens, particularly Ukrainians who had suffered a massive famine in the early 1930s, welcomed the invaders as liberators. This was largely forgotten in the aftermath of WWII, as the Western allies had agreed to repatriate any Soviet citizens (even those from areas like the Baltic states). Of course, almost all those who were repatriated were shot or died in the gulags. Remarkably, a large number of Ukrainian SS volunteers did survive to become British citizens by claiming to be from formerly Polish areas (when Red Army officers came to a major POW camp to find Soviet citizens they pissed off the British commandant so much that he refused to repatriate any of the prisoners - the Red Army officers were not interested in taking only Soviet citizens, they wanted anyone who had fought on the Eastern front and made it plain they would be summarily executed).

    15. Re:I was close to participation by fatphil · · Score: 1

      If you're going to compare the Estonians' views on Nazis and Soviets, then how do you explain the fact that the Estonians moved the Nazi war-memorial statue years ago?

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    16. Re:I was close to participation by fatphil · · Score: 1

      From the small sample of European countries with which I'm familiar, such as the ones where I've lived, you are not wrong. Every single one has had such a requirement.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    17. Re:I was close to participation by fatphil · · Score: 1

      There *was* a Nazi war memorial - you moved it 5 or 6 years back.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    18. Re:I was close to participation by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      That applies to people who IMMIGRATE into the country, not ones who lived there for generations -- those get citizenship at birth when they can't possibly speak any language beyond "Waaa!". Estonia refused to convert former USSR citizenship into Estonian citizenship, thus forcing those people into having no citizenship at all.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    19. Re:I was close to participation by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      And nevertheless all those people are traitors, and deserve all derision they got.

      Glorifying the WWII version of "welcoming the overlords" is something that only people completely blinded by their hatred of Russia and USSR could do.

      If someone forgot:

      Confirmed victims of Stalin: about 2 millions.
      Confirmed victims of Nazi: >50 millions.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    20. Re:I was close to participation by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      No European country except former USSR, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Yugoslavian states, recently faced the situation when they had to "grandfather" citizenship of former larger country.

      Of them three Baltic states alone have the distinction of refusing to do so. Think of it -- they managed to outdo Baltic states, the showcase of ethnic conflict in Europe.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    21. Re:I was close to participation by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      ...meant "outdo Balkan states, formerly parts of Yugoslavia".

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    22. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying that Stalin was a good guy? Lesser of two evils is still completely evil. Besides, Estonia did not choose Nazis overs Soviets. If it would have been their way, they would have been independent since 1918. You should get out more and not believe everything Russian propaganda tells you. But since you seem to have Russian relations, if you're not Russian yourself, I think your comments should be taken with a grain of salt.

      Peace.

    23. Re:I was close to participation by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      No, I am saying that if you join Nazi to fight Stalin, you are still a Nazi. Isn't it obvious?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    24. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The germans made it pretty clear. You fight with them or you die. Same thing with the soviets. True, estonians fought on both sides but not for Soviet nor nazi ideology. Both these times they fought for the freedom of Estonia.

    25. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do not prefer Nazis over Soviets. They wanted the controversial and increasingly politically loaded statue out of the city centre. Granted, it should have been moved 18 years ago together with the rest of the Soviet statues; granted, it was a case of botched PR. But it had to be removed, or the biannual demonstrations around it would have turned even bloodier. It was already dangerous to be near the statue on 9 May and speak Estonian.

    26. Re:I was close to participation by m1z · · Score: 1

      It was erected on a private property by one of our crazy nationalist. It was removed shorty by goverment. This could happen everywhere.

    27. Re:I was close to participation by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      The difference here is that Estonian Russians have a place to move to, and they would be granted Russian citizenship without much hassle. In fact, IIRC, 1/3 of holders of the "non-citizen" Estonian passports also happen to have Russian citizenship - yet they choose to stay in Estonia. A very large number of participants of the Tallinn protests actually belong to that category - it was rather ironic that the toughest punishment considered for those who participated in the looting that followed was deportation from the country.

      At any rate, I find it hard to call the position of Russians in Estonia persecution. The only thing that's being asked of them is to learn the language. Those who do happily integrate and don't have any problems (I know a few personally). Those who don't, well - if they want to speak Russian exclusively not only at home but also at work and when visiting government officials, and want their children to study in the (free, public) schools entirely in Russian, and then enroll into universities and continue studying in Russian there - well, guess what, there's a neighboring country where Russians are the majority, and Russian is a state language. But Estonia is a nation-state of the Estonian nation, and I believe they are fully justified in protecting their culture.

      The only real point there is that Russians make 1/4th of the whole population, and as such can be called a significant minority. However, it is a pretty weak case, since this population influx is fairly recent, immediately following the occupation of Estonia by the USSR in mid-1940s - in other words, there is very weak historical reason for these people to be there. Still, noone is speaking of deporting all Russians from Estonia en masse or anything - they are just being told that, if they want to be true Estonian citizens, they have to integrate; otherwise, they are still free to live in the country as guests, but they shouldn't ask for native population to change things purely for their convenience.

      P.S. I am Russian, and I live in Russia. I just happen to have a different perspective on things than most of my compatriots.

    28. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd tend to disagree that the "ethnic cleansing" carried out in the Balkans is outdone by refusing to automaticaly grant citizenship to people settled in Estonia and Latvia during the soviet occupation and to their progeny.

    29. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word! That's quite nice explanation of how we (estonians) really feel.

      About the cyber war though, so we couldn't visit the bank online for a few hours. So what? Big deal ... nothing bad really happened. I think the worst thing is that you can't watch .. emn .. movies online. That's it.

      The powerstations, traffic control & phone lines can work independently of internet, so no problem there.

    30. Re:I was close to participation by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      No.

      Estonian (and other non-German) Waffen SS were volunteer forces.

      It's also absolutely normal for a country under attack by a foreign aggressor to issue a draft, however I don't expect Americans to know anything about that -- the last war you, guys, had on your territory was your Civil War.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    31. Re:I was close to participation by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Confirmed victims of Stalin: about 2 millions. Stalin is responsible for the deaths of approximately 60 million people - from a combination of murder, war, famine, and neglect. That includes some of the Russians killed by the Nazis, as Stalin often sent military units into hopeless battles deliberately to eliminate his "opponents". His collectivization policies completely destroyed Russian agriculture causing famine, which he encouraged to purge more of his "opponents". Of course, he also outright kidnapped and murdered millions of innocent people.

      Stalin is almost the definition of evil, even moreso because people in Russia still try to defend his madness. Stalin was worse than Hitler but slightly better than Mao. But even the People's Republic of China now admits that Mao was basically a monster.

      None of this is a condemnation of communism or even the Soviet Union per se. Virtually everyone agrees that Lenin and Khrushchev were far better leaders.

    32. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Estonia refused to convert former USSR citizenship into Estonian citizenship This is true, but

      thus forcing those people into having no citizenship at all. this is false, every former soviet citizen can get a Russian citizenship if they wanted to.

      Ofcourse many would still prefer a passport which would give them EU citizenship (and thus making it easy to travel and/or migrate into other EU countries) and for that ofcourse they have to have at least a basic knowledge of the language and history of the country in which (as you claim) they have lived for generations. Could you imagine living in the USA for generations yet only speaking russian?
    33. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About preferring Nazis over Soviets: obviously, there are your fellow countrymen who prefer them. So the rumours about pro-Nazi sentiments in Baltic countries are not unfounded. Ofcourse their are people who prefer the nazi occupation to the soviet one. Not only that but their are people of actually like the nazi ideology (hating yews etc.), but it is not something that makes the Baltic countries special. By that standard you could easily say that Russia has pro-zazi sentiments, perhaps even more so than any of the Baltics could ever imagine.
    34. Re:I was close to participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We (I am an Estonian) do NOT prefer Nazis. looks like you do

      Monument of Lihula

      enjoy your hypocrisy
    35. Re:I was close to participation by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      >>There are Russians (ethnic Russians, not Russian Federation citizens) in Estonia,
      >True. The vast majority of ethnic Russians in Estonia though immigrated during the Soviet era, as part of russification and build up of industrialization. Should Estonia be allowed to try and restore a national identity and choose it's own national language?

      They absolutely do, but doing things that do irritate a part of their population(and they knew that it would irritate) is not really helping their cause.
      And in any case Out of 3 Baltic states, Latvia and Estonia chose an interesting way of integrating the russians into their societies - they decided that integration is a one way street - Estonians and Latvians are waiting at the end of it for Russians to integrate, without any incentives.

    36. Re:I was close to participation by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      The figure most widely accepted by historians in both the West and the former Soviet Union for those who died in Gulags between 1930-53 are 1.9 million, which doesn't include the 1.8 million believed to have been shot without being sentenced to the camps. That's 3.7 million already. The brief access to the KGB and state archives that occurred during the Yeltsin era reinforced these conclusions, although the records are missing for a number of periods and regions. An additional 20 to 25 million Soviet citizens are believed to have died of all causes in World War II. As for the motives of individuals in siding with the invading forces, bear in mind that for many they were seen as the lesser of two evils - especially for the Balts and Ukrainians, of whom the latter had died in their millions during the famine of the 1932-3. It's also worth remembering that most citizens of the Soviet Union had not chosen to live under that regime (the only relatively free election under the Bolsheviks had resulted in a clear win for the Social Revolutionaries, and was promptly annulled by Lenin).

      And by the way, only a stubborn apologist for Stalin would confuse my original comment for some sort of "glorification" of Nazi ethnic ideology.

  8. Short summary of the original by MikePlacid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cyber attacks are dangerous (impact on Estonia described). The are too easy to organize (Russian blogs described). We need draconian laws to punish offenders. Russia (and other poorly governed countries) can't be relied upon to establish draconian laws. We must lead the way! (and probably force everyone else to follow).

  9. I wonder when... by Fluffeh · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder when the "Usual suspects" in terms of global terrorism and splinter governments realize that this sort of warfare is much cheaper to run than what they are doing, and can cause just as much if not more harm to the target country.

    Lets hope it's later rather than sooner.

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:I wonder when... by archeopterix · · Score: 1

      [...] that this sort of warfare is much cheaper to run than what they are doing, and can cause just as much if not more harm to the target country.
      In rational terms - maybe, but terror relies on emotional rather than rational assesment of the damage.

      Two buildings and a few thousand people? More of each perish everyday for natural reasons. And yet it made headlines.

      "GNP damage due to internet attacks estimated at 2 bajillion dollars" won't make it to page 1.

  10. Oh hey by kjzk · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, riots cyber you!

  11. No, no, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...
    What bothers me much more is that the scorecards for US departments make it clear that the US is even less prepared for a cyberwar than even Balkan castoffs. Estonia a Balkan state? Where did you study your geography?
  12. What did they expect? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A government of a tiny country, that has no achievements other than supporting relatively comfortable life for its microscopic population on subsidies and investments, and acting as US agent in EU (aka member of "New Europe"), imagines itself important and invulnerable, and pisses off hundreds of millions of people.

    An extremely small minority of the pissed off hundreds of millions performs otherwise meaningless juvenile prank, that multiplied by the number of participants causes visible problems.

    What the Hell did Estonian government expect? That the strength of their self-righteousness, or their American overlords, will protect them?

    Learn some international politics beyond "do what sugar daddy says, and everything will be fine".

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:What did they expect? by Wes+Janson · · Score: 2

      I am neither Estonian nor Russian, and have never visited either country.

      That being said, this attitude that the Estonian government is somehow horribly evil for moving a statue I find to be utterly incomprehensible. If the United States government decided tomorrow to move the Vietnam wall across the Mall and plunk it down over somewhere else, you'd have a few thousand disgruntled veterans. You might see a few angry op-ed letters. The idea that there would be violent rioting in the streets and destruction of public infrastructure is absolutely insane.

      I strongly suspect there are more layers and levels to the nationalism behind this issue than one simply of respect. Population growth and ethnic tensions seem to be what's really at heart. Blaming the Estonian government for the situation, though, is bafflingly illogical.

    2. Re:What did they expect? by upside · · Score: 1

      Hmm, so you're saying a nation's right to self-determination and to conduct internal affairs depends on
      - it's size
      - it's achievements
      - perceived humility towards a neighbouring nation so insecure they get aroused by a small gesture

      You're simply betraying your own sense of superiority and arrogant imperialist tendencies.

      Russians need to grow up and realise they don't need to care what others think of them. Their reaction is no different from Muslims issuing fatwahs on Danish cartoonists. Oh, and learn to see there is usually more than one valid viewpoint on a given issue, and respect others' views.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    3. Re:What did they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or sure, that's why they in US renamed French fries to freedom fries. Because they are fully grown up and always respect other people's points of view. As long as it agrees with US point of view.

      Speaking about sense of superiority and arrogant imperialist tendencies, please shut up, American dumbshit.

    4. Re:What did they expect? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      That being said, this attitude that the Estonian government is somehow horribly evil for moving a statue I find to be utterly incomprehensible. If the United States government decided tomorrow to move the Vietnam wall across the Mall and plunk it down over somewhere else


      No, actually, think about it more like: think that France decided to dismantle some monument to the WW2 American soldiers and send it back to America, together with a very loud and very melodramatic message, along the lines of, "fuck you very much, we didn't invite you here in the first place. Oh, and we liked the Nazis and Petain more."

      I'm guessing there would be a _lot_ of fist shaking and bellicose declarations in the USA. Remember that USA is the country where a lot of people renamed "french fries" to "freedom fries", over a _much_ smaller offense. In fact, over little more than France refusing to toe the line in a war of aggression. There was a whole freaking tsunami of posts along the lines of, "fuck the french! we saved them! how _dare_ they show some free will when we say 'jump'??!"

      Kids proposing a DDOS? There was at least a reverend who proposed to move an aircraft carrier next to a France port to scare them into submission, and that's off the top of my head. Now he may have been a woefully uninformed about the size of France and its military might, if he thought they're that easy to scare, but nevertheless, he was proposing an act of _war_.

      And we still haven't seen the end of _that_ from various loud kids and shotgun-waving rednecks from the USA.

      So I'd say that if all that happened from Russia was a bunch of disgruntled script-kiddies proposing a DDOS, then the Russians are quite peaceful.

      you'd have a few thousand disgruntled veteran


      Yes, you'd have a few _thousand_ disgruntled veterans. Now think that Russia has lost 50 times more lives in WW2 than the USA did. There'll be _lot_ of disgruntled veterans, plus the children and grandchildren of people who died in that stupid war. If you start dismantling their monuments, don't be surprised if you have some tens to hundreds of thousands of people who get pissed off.

      Now I'm not trying to defend the act in any way, but it helps to see it in perspective.
      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    5. Re:What did they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That being said, this attitude that the Estonian government is somehow horribly evil for moving a statue I find to be utterly incomprehensible. If the United States government decided tomorrow to move the Vietnam wall across the Mall and plunk it down over somewhere else, you'd have a few thousand disgruntled veterans. You might see a few angry op-ed letters. The idea that there would be violent rioting in the streets and destruction of public infrastructure is absolutely insane. The USA hasn't been occupied by a foreign country in a LONG time. I don't really think this is an applicable analogy in any way.
    6. Re:What did they expect? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Hmm, so you're saying a nation's right to self-determination and to conduct internal affairs depends on
      - it's size
      - it's achievements
      - perceived humility towards a neighbouring nation so insecure they get aroused by a small gesture That's a part of it. Otherwise every gang will claim its stomping ground to be their "nation". In addition to that claiming that they were oppressed while being a member of large federation (USSR, where small Estonia had 1/15 of votes in Soviet of Nationalities, one of two Supreme Soviet chambers) only to join one large union (EU) and act there in the interests of yet another large country (US) pretty much discredits the whole idea of "freedom-loving Estonian politicians". Estonian independence was a windfall from USSR dissolution. They did nothing to achieve it -- dissolution of USSR was entirely a result of talks between leaders of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, with no other former USSR members involved. They could've used it in a more responsible way.
      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    7. Re:What did they expect? by catman · · Score: 1

      And "French fries" didn't even originate in France, but in Belgium. Oh, the irony ...

    8. Re:What did they expect? by Rycross · · Score: 1

      I missed the part where the poster said he was American, or what America has to do with a dispute between Estonia and Russia...

      And since when is criticizing Russia the same as supporting America's behavior? Or are you just making assumptions about the person's beliefs? And you call him a dumbshit? Look in the mirror.

    9. Re:What did they expect? by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

      Ummm..... Ok.... You quite clearly seem to be part of the russian majority that has been brainwashed by govenment controlled media and their twisted versions of the world's events. The population of Estona isn't really big compared to the population of the Russian Federation, as the're called these days, but it still doesn't remove them the right to make up thier own political agenda and decide for themselves. Unlike most of the Russians think, the bronze statue of the russian soldier symbolized a completely different thing for the Estonian people than what it did for the Russians. As mentioned before here, it symbolized the crimes and cruelty and crimes against the Estonin people after the second world war by the USSR. Shure, for the minority of russians in Estonia mostly offspring from Russians moved there by Stalin, but still they ARE a minority. And as a lot of people have mentioned before, it was moved to a more suitable spot than a buss station, a military graveyard. The other events sparked by this were also quite shocking. Noting, I mean NOTHING gives a right to go to another country to loot, pilage and destroy property worth tens of millions of dollars. So, Russia has absolutely NO right to interfere with Estonian domestic politics. Estonia is now an independent nation, not a part of the USSR or Russian Federation as sounded like you were thinking in your post.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    10. Re:What did they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other kinds of international politics besides the realpolitik that Hans Morgenthau, Henry Kissinger and the Russian missiles represent. There are other ways to look at it. Your take on international relations is probably "we got the guns and ammo, you are weak, kowtow now!"

      The root of the problem is quite simply the matter of the diminishing of the Russian sphere of influence, something that its overlords cannot tolerate. The web of deceit that they weave using their state-controlled media is effective, as can be deduced from your outburst. Off the record, they admit: Estonia did everything correctly. BUT! "Vy nas ochen oskorbili!" And that is that.

    11. Re:What did they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      saywhat?
      international politics my ass, if you want to move russia's reaction and action up to this standard.

      if you see some fag beating granny on a corner, go tell him to stop, get a good kick in your head... are you wrong for saying "stop" or you should have "expected" problems and did nothing for this.

    12. Re:What did they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or to put more simply "the Ests should do what we tell them to becouse they're small and weak, but those meddling prevent us from showing them their place"?

    13. Re:What did they expect? by rtechie · · Score: 1

      No, actually, think about it more like: think that France decided to dismantle some monument to the WW2 American soldiers and send it back to America, together with a very loud and very melodramatic message, along the lines of, "fuck you very much, we didn't invite you here in the first place. Oh, and we liked the Nazis and Petain more." When did the USA march the French into concentration camps? Oh that's right, THEY DIDN'T. Stalin killed way more Estonians than Hitler.

      The situation is more comparable to Native Americans asking for a war memorial dedicated to the US Army removed from their territory. Sure, at various points the US Army did "defend" Native Americans, but they slaughtered a lot more of them.

    14. Re:What did they expect? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Actually I lived in US for the last 14 years, and have rather negative impression about all involved countries' propaganda.

      Estonia is still a small, weak and insignificant country that exists entirely as a result of its neighbors' decisions and therefore is at their mercy, Estonian government's anti-Russian policy is still ethnic discrimination that is unheard of in post-WWII Europe, and its behavior in EU is still whoring to US influence.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    15. Re:What did they expect? by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      >> Blaming the Estonian government for the situation, though, is bafflingly illogical.

      They are to blame. As a citizen of Lithuania, ethnically Russian, I know that a country CAN avoid those problems when they actually TRY to talk to the WWII veteran organizations. The level of integration of minorities into Lithuania society is very good, maybe due to more than 8 centuries living together.
      Estonian problem is that they believe that they are autonomous from the Russian minority. And the tremendous lack of communication is on both sides, but if Estonians want to be the good ones, they should step up the efforts. And I seriously doubt that the Russian side will do the first steps there....

    16. Re:What did they expect? by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Your comment would be correct, if you actually knew that there a a lot of ethnic Russians and WWII veterans in Estonia, some of them even have Estonian citizenship.

    17. Re:What did they expect? by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Hey, hey, hey....
      Estonians did a lot to gain their independence, that was their own choice made in a peaceful way.
      And on a side note: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania left USSR BEFORE it was officially disbanded.

    18. Re:What did they expect? by upside · · Score: 1

      Not American. Sorry, no cigar.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    19. Re:What did they expect? by upside · · Score: 1

      I understand the Russian political situation in that they are worried about more independence-seeking parts.

      But, there is a _slight_ difference between being invaded and forcibly joined into a federation (and then being mistreated), and voluntarily joining an *international* organization composed of *sovereign* states. Either you are blind or choosing to ignore the reasons why Estonia joined EU and NATO, it's precisely because they don't want to be invaded by Russia again. I also strongly object to the suggestion that you need to do something (I assume you suggest to sacrifice thousands of lives) to deserve independence. The flip side of that argument is that it's OK to invade any country that doesn't put up a fight. What did Switzerland do to "deserve" independence?

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  13. Don't fuck with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    motha nature, motha-in-laws, or mothafuckin Russian botnets

  14. Improperly moved monument by Mick+Malkemus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The issue here was how the Russian people of Estonia were disregarded when the monument was moved. The monument could have been moved by involving the Russian people, not simply uprooting it and moving it. Any culture would have taken deep offense at the way this was done. The move was meant as an offense, a way to show how Estonians feel about Russian Estonians. I think Estonia is lucky it was just a cyber attack.

    1. Re:Improperly moved monument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you involve someone in something they are completely against to the point of rioting and looting?

    2. Re:Improperly moved monument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. The monument was relocated the night that the april riot broke loose. It was not meant to show a negative attitude against russians. It was meant to end the damn conflict. Do you know that actually most of the russians in Estonia are happier with the statue moved to the war cemetery? Only two groups are pissed off: Russian government that always wants to show how they are constantly hurt by others without doing anything wrong and then there is the part of veterans and youth who actually want the conflict, would prefer that Estonia would become part of Russia again and are the ones that are seen every year trampling on estonian flags, getting drunk and picking fights with anyone who doesn't agree. Pretty much everyone else, both estonians and russians are quite content with the current solution. The monument stands calmly in the war cemetery and can be respected in peace.

    3. Re:Improperly moved monument by Mick+Malkemus · · Score: 0

      This isn't the story according to the Russians I know in Estonia. Sorry.

  15. Fear not Estonia! by highwaytohell · · Score: 1

    Pauly Shore and his Encino Man will come to the rescue!!

    shoooooshhh

    *duck*

  16. I have to disagree there. by jd · · Score: 1
    Luddism was founded on the principle that the way technology was being implemented was costing jobs (it actually triggered widespread poverty and a total economic collapse in some areas). It was not a campaign against technology or advances, merely against short-term gains by management at the expense of everyone else. If companies had been willing to use technology to enhance the productivity of individuals and transfer people from redundant, tedious work into more profitable specialty areas, I doubt Ludd or his followers would have raised a finger. They'd probably have invested their efforts into helping.

    In this case, people generally eat better and live better, reducing the strain on their immune system by diseases. Instead of working with the health care industry, though, there has been an effort to marginalize it through these sorts of autism accusations. Thus, it is actually the health care industry that is in the same boat Ludd was in, NOT the mainstream individual, and their reaction is little different from Ludd's, opting for ethically unsound retaliation and paranoia.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:I have to disagree there. by emilper · · Score: 1

      Luddism was founded on the principle that the way technology was being implemented was costing jobs


      were they losing jobs ? Not really.

      If companies had been willing to use technology to enhance the productivity of individuals and transfer people from redundant, tedious work into more profitable specialty areas, I doubt Ludd or his followers would have raised a finger.


      That's exactly what was happening: companies used technology to transfer people from redundant tedious work into more profitable specialty areas. Except "the people" had the law with them saying that "only certified cloth cutters can do this", and the companied did away with the need for certified cloth cutters by using machines to cut the cloth faster and better, and could employ any bum to operate them, so the "certified" folks had to find some other way to become indispensable. The way they found was to wreck the machines.
    2. Re:I have to disagree there. by bob.appleyard · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know who the Luddites were originally. Who are the Luddites now, though?

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
  17. Government is not directly responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian authorities do not encourage web attacks, they encourage anti-Estonian sentiments. According to the Russian media that is under government control, half of the world is our potential enemy - right now the focus is on Ukraine, so quite many people have already learned to hate our neighboring country. I have seen some Russian hacker boards - most (if not all) of the 'hackers' responsible for those attacks are brainwashed teenagers. I guess a DDoS attack on an Estonian web-server pleases their twisted patriotic feelings somehow - and it also doesn't take a lot of skill. So the government is not directly responsible for the attacks (what's the point of encouraging those attacks anyway?) but of course they are responsible via encouraging the anti-Estonian feelings.

  18. The Truth (tm) by Nephrite · · Score: 1

    The truth is that every little nation from the former Soviet Union wants their piece from big fat (still) Russia. As Georgia in Caucasus, Ukraine in Sebastopol so is Estonia. But... well no one wants anything with Estonia! It is a small weak country. So they try all kinds of provocations, some successful some not. The last one I remember is the fuss over the Bronze Soldier. Now they accusing Russia of cyberwar. Why am I not surprised at all?

    1. Re:The Truth (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because you are ignorant?

  19. Expert Ignorance of Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Experts seem to ignore the social and political phenomenon that caused and motivated the upheaval in the first place, and prefer to view this as some kind of cyber war instead of what it really was: social unrest caused by Estonian discrimination of their Russian minority.

    Anonymous is powerful when they are motivated.

    If this was a cyber war, then so is the Anonymous crusade against the Church of Scientology. There is no real difference. An injustice is perceived and people become motivated to fix it through whatever activist means they have.

    The funny part in this is the perseverance with which USA and US military specialists insist on it being a full scale cyber war attack, and the fault of Russian government, without any actual hard proof of it that I am aware of. Not to mention basic logic.

    Of course, recent military cyber war budgets and "cyber war attacks by Russia" go well in hand, so it's more beneficial to view this incident as an organized Cyber War, instead of what it most likely was: a group of Anonymous, skillful, annoyed, activists in pursuit of social justice.

    Racism and discrimination of Russians by the Estonian government should be a lesson to us all in treating minorities: Increasingly, the minorities can bite back with the help of Internet.

    1. Re:Expert Ignorance of Anonymous by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      The funny part in this is the perseverance with which USA and US military specialists insist on it being a full scale cyber war attack, and the fault of Russian government, without any actual hard proof of it that I am aware of. Not to mention basic logic. They have spent half a century accusing Russians and USSR in everything imaginable, so they had plenty of practice.
      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  20. official goverment doesn't respect its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    it wouldn't happen if Estonian goverment had some respect for its citizens with non-estonian ethnic origin. What they should expect from citizens(actually they even don't have that status) whom they don't respect? All the same in all baltic states. The national TV openly calls such citizens 'the 5th column', which IMHO is politically incorrect.
    How about lithuanian law(still in project status) that would grant double-citizenship only to emigrated citizens that are of lithuanian ethnic origin :) Yeah, they are 'partners' of the greatest and justiest country in this world: THE UNITED STATES

  21. I actually saw it by Jay+Tarbox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A customer of mine (small college) reported issues with their (smallish) internet pipe one evening. Something appeared to be hogging a bunch of bandwidth.
    Long story short, a sniffer revealed a huge amount of traffic coming from a particular student machine directed at an IP address ARIN showed as belonging to Estonia's government. We said huh, wierd and shut down his switch port and went to bed.
    Of course we found out a little bit later about the attacks. I don't have the sniffer traces anymore.

  22. yes i am by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    opinionated nationalistic "gentleman" all he is...
    http://blogs.securiteam.com/?p=481
    worried about Pro-Palestinian Hackers vs. Pro-Israeli Hackers then China vs. Taiwan hackers,
    now its estonia vs russia, he has minimum interest getting to the core of the issue, it looks like ethnicity is of much bigger interest to him...

  23. False info in TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article seems to provide some false information:

    The attacks began in April 2007 when authorities from the former Soviet state disclosed plans to move a Russian World War II memorial out of a town square and into a military graveyard. An outcry from ethnic Russians in the country led to a series of real-world riots as well as an outbreak of cyber-attacks on Estonian government websites. Actually the monument was moved because of the riots. It was decided that moving the memorial from the middle of the city to a calm war cemetery would soften the conflict and it did. The statue gets the respect it deserves now instead of standing in the middle of a trolleybus station causing annual problems.
  24. I hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you learned a little lesson on "correcting people"...