Slashdot Mirror


China's Cyber-Militia

D. J. Keenan notes that the cover story of the current issue of National Journal reports in depth on China's cyber-aggression against US targets in the government, military, and business. We have discussed China's actions on numerous occasions over the years. The news in this report is the suggestion that Chinese cyber-attackers may have been involved in major power outages in the US. "Computer hackers in China, including those working on behalf of the Chinese government and military, have penetrated deeply into the information systems of US companies and government agencies, stolen proprietary information from American executives in advance of their business meetings in China, and, in a few cases, gained access to electric power plants in the United States, possibly triggering two recent and widespread blackouts in Florida and the Northeast, according to US government officials and computer-security experts..."

196 comments

  1. Microsoft? Windows? by westbake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "A computer virus" is as close as this article came to the reason power companies are so wide open to any aggressor.

    --
    I am a name troll of Westlake. Visit my homepage to learn why.
  2. My power went out for an hour yesterday by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    Now I know the truth- it was the Chinese cyber-militia!

    1. Re:My power went out for an hour yesterday by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      The US Gov't should buy some or all of the storm botnet from the Russian Mafia(capitalism at it's finest!) and DDoS the hell out of any offending Chinese I.P.'s.

      That'll teach them reds! Oh, wait.

    2. Re:My power went out for an hour yesterday by rootpassbird · · Score: 1

      US Gov't should buy some maybe already done...
      maybe stated design goal...
      Agreed it sounds too far-fetched, but it's not impossible, given the way most govt secret agencies produce results - through proxies.
      --
      Hackers have long memories. It works both ways.
  3. Huh!? by fluch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are vital parts of power plants connected to The Internet? Why?

    1. Re:Huh!? by ChowRiit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You beat me to it - hell, my old SCHOOL didn't have their servers that contained student records connected to the internet, and this was back 5+ years ago when people were less well educated on these things.

      That ANY major infrastructure would be connected to the internet is shocking, and I'd really like to believe that people aren't that stupid...

    2. Re:Huh!? by rfreedman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what I find equally amazing is that the U.S. military commonly uses MS Windows and both commercial and Open Source software. Just google 'U.S. Military COTS Software' - COTS means 'Common Off The Shelf' - yeah, the gub'ment has an acronym for everything :-)

    3. Re:Huh!? by grizdog · · Score: 1
      The article was so vague that it may not be that vital power systems are on the internet - I hope we get some comments from people who know about such things, especially people who work in power company IT departments.

      I remember years ago I was consultant for the NSA, and on one occasion I entered a computer room at the Friendship Annex ("why is that red light flashing?" "Because you're in here"). I saw the low security machine that I would use to communicate with my contracting officers, and right next to it was a high-security machine, not on arpanet (this was a real long time ago), but connected to the low security machine. People do strange things sometimes.

    4. Re:Huh!? by Stradivarius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the alternative to COTS? Custom-building every piece of hardware and writing every piece of code from the firmware, to the operating system, and applications in-house?

      There's a lot of reason to believe that doing so would result in less secure software. The software would have less people trying to break it, thus less opportunity to find and fix the inevitable bugs. There's something to be said for the trial-by-fire that is a public release of software. And in many cases it probably wouldn't get the same investment of dollars into the software as the commercial world can afford, so you have less money to fix said bugs when they were discovered.

      Similarly the software would likely be less functional, given that even the defense budget is not infinite. It just makes sense to leverage COTS, provided you can ensure adequate supply of parts in a major conflict. That is a challenge with the effects of globalization.

      Using COTS where it makes sense doesn't mean you should hook everything up the Internet though.

    5. Re:Huh!? by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they've got those servers online by now. People have learned a lot about how to monetize the value providers in the last 5 years.

      Snarking a bit more, Google has a HUGE amount of infrastructure connected to the internet. It's almost as if their business depends on it. That isn't the kind of infrastructure you are talking about, but it is still a mildly amusing counterpoint.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Huh!? by blhack · · Score: 1

      They aren't.

      However, the computers that hook into the SCADA systems are.

      Although, I would love to see the manual for operating a power plant start like ths:

      "Open a web browser (internet explorer is recommended(read:required due to some fucking activex crap on the page)) and navigate to http://10.8.0.15441/ you will be promted to log in. The default password is "Admin" with no username. Please change this as soon as possible".

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    7. Re:Huh!? by _xeno_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've always heard it as "Commercial Off The Shelf" - and Google seems to agree with me. (Yes, even Linux use would generally be commercial, because it usually comes with support contracts from someone.)

      But anyway, part of the reason for using COTS products in general is that people bitch about "government waste" and things like "$500 hammers" - so in response, the government and the DOD started a mandate to use more COTS products.

      The idea is to save money by not reinventing the wheel where it isn't needed. Quite a lot of the government and the military is paper pushing, and when COTS software can be used instead of custom designed software, it's a win in cost - which means spending less taxpayer money, which means taxpayers are less upset.

      Which isn't to say everything is COTS, but the government likes the idea of using products that are easy to obtain and have a wide knowledge base of users to draw on. That way, if a COTS product breaks, it's easier to replace or repair, since it may be possible to have it fixed/replaced without going back to the original vendor.

      Using COTS products where possible saves government money, which is taxpayer money, which is likely your money. It's a good thing.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    8. Re:Huh!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That ANY major infrastructure would be connected to the internet is shocking, and I'd really like to believe that people aren't that stupid... I'd just like to take a moment to appologize for being a stupid arse, once upon a time.
      I'm sorry I designed applications with a hidden global password for accessing a database, then used fake users/passwords on top of that through the application.

      I didn't put holes in the security of any place that'd be considered "major infrastructure" - just one institution's bread and butter. I DO know better now, but the design flaws were not understood or protested by anyone - and I even brought up the subject once and pointed out how someone like me could circumvent it. There was no way I could've known the right way back then. It must've been secure enough though, because the flaws were never (widely?) discovered...

      Thank the great zombie I'm luckier than I am smart.
    9. Re:Huh!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > COTS means 'Common Off The Shelf'

      Commercial Off The Shelf, actually.

      Most FOSS stuff isn't considered COTS since it doesn't have a vendor contact. Doesn't keep it from being used, but it does make for a separate classification.

    10. Re:Huh!? by Niten · · Score: 1

      To be fair, your school probably didn't have to worry about remote management or distributed load-balancing issues, problems which are well suited to control systems operating over a computer network. Proactive security would dictate that this should all be conducted over a private, dedicated line; cost effectiveness says that it should be done over the Internet. Guess which imperative is more likely to win the hearts and minds of shareholders?

      I agree, they should know better. I'd bet most of them do know better. But security is not the primary objective here, and it will never win out against the bottom line without regulatory intervention.

    11. Re:Huh!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you see it has to do with this little thing called reliability. FERC dictates that there is certain information that has to be shared between local utilities to promote the overall integrity of the power grid. Unfortunately that requires a connection to some sort of public network. Most utilities have a good deal of buffer, and tight control (in addition to IDS, threat mitigation, and so on) between what's public and the control systems. However, most of the data that needs to be shared comes from the control system, so we need to share it somehow. What's really bad is now we have congress being told that it's possible to blow up a generator by simply hacking into the control network. In case you missed it the first time around... IDS, threat mitigation, multiple firewalls, routers, threat detection software, 24x7x365 monitoring, not to mention fail safes in the generators themselves, this is highly unlikely. Look forward to higher power bills though as our government saves us from this terrible problem (that doesn't really exist).

    12. Re:Huh!? by solitas · · Score: 1

      My doctor has to send all his stuff to Medicare either by mail or fax or a phone modem direct to their number, using their app on his winbox (I've had to set it up for him every time he's gotten a new machine). THEY still don't connect directly to the internet...

      You should be able to verify this with your doctor.

      Hospitals and agencies may try to jazz the system, but Medicare doesn't have to suffer electronic break-ins.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    13. Re:Huh!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be 24x7x52 - not 24x7x365.

      "Twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, fifty-two weeks a year" builds logically; "twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, three hundred and sixty-five days a year" does not.

    14. Re:Huh!? by saintsfan · · Score: 1

      energy technicians need to send email and surf /. too. I don't work for an energy company, but at the company I do work for, plenty of people connected to mission-critical applications use the internet.

    15. Re:Huh!? by 0xG · · Score: 1

      Just like: July 4, 2008 or 123 Any St., Apt 212 Yourtown, USA etc.

      --
      A pox on web designers who feel that window.innerWidth == screen.availWidth
  4. Difficult since hackers hide behind huge NAT by amrik98 · · Score: 0

    It's hard to prosecute hackers and spammers when they hide behind the Great Firewall of China. The information is of course in the NAT logs, but these are controlled by their government. Thats why when I see automated SSH cracking attempts at my computer I can't really do anything other than block it.

    1. Re:Difficult since hackers hide behind huge NAT by david.given · · Score: 1

      It's hard to prosecute hackers and spammers when they hide behind the Great Firewall of China. The information is of course in the NAT logs, but these are controlled by their government.

      You do know that the Great Firewall is not, in fact, a NAT? It's just a simple filtering service applied on the master gateways to the outside world. It does proxy DNS, but that's it; all other packets are either passed through unchanged or blocked entirely, depending on the firewall policy.

      Go look at the Wikipedia article; it's got a reasonable amount of technical information.

    2. Re:Difficult since hackers hide behind huge NAT by Ziest · · Score: 1

      Yep, These bozos were banging away at my sshd process for weeks until I changed the port sshd listens on. Now, I change it every months or so and alert the people who need to login into these servers that the port has changed.

      --
      Another day closer to redwood heaven
    3. Re:Difficult since hackers hide behind huge NAT by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Ummm. China's firewall is not NAT, and is in fact pretty much transparent. In fact it works the same way SandVine does with BitTorrent: it forges RST packets to both ends.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  5. I hope this guy isn't getting paid by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Computer hackers in China, including those working on behalf of the Chinese government and military, have penetrated deeply into the information systems of U.S. companies and government agencies, stolen proprietary information from American executives in advance of their business meetings in China, and, in a few cases, gained access to electric power plants in the United States, possibly triggering two recent and widespread blackouts in Florida and the Northeast, according to U.S. government officials and computer-security experts.

    Wow, has professional writing ever gone downhill. Ever heard of a period?

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    1. Re:I hope this guy isn't getting paid by dotancohen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, has professional writing ever gone downhill. Ever heard of a period? Some guys just don't like doing it on the rag.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:I hope this guy isn't getting paid by Cairnarvon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sentence is as clear as it can be, and splitting it up would only serve to add padding and dilute the information content. I realise catering to short attention spans is the in thing to do right now, but come on.

    3. Re:I hope this guy isn't getting paid by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wow, has professional writing ever gone downhill. Ever heard of a period? You've obviously never read anything written over a hundred years ago.
      Professional writing used to be a competition to put on paper the longest sentence with the least amount of punctuation possible.

      What we call a paragraph, they called a sentence.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:I hope this guy isn't getting paid by couchslug · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Wow, has professional writing ever gone downhill. Ever heard of a period?"

      No

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:I hope this guy isn't getting paid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: Joseph Conrad.

  6. Some quotes from the article by D.+J.+Keenan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    [I am the submitter.]
    It is a long article, but worth reading. The suspicion of Chinese involvement in two major U.S. power outages is extremely worrying. Following are quotes on related aspects.

    The Central Intelligence Agency's chief cyber-security officer, Tom Donahue, said that hackers had breached the computer systems of utility companies outside the United States and that they had even demanded ransom.

    ... many of the systems that [U.S.] utility operators use were designed by others. Intelligence officials now worry that software developed overseas poses another layer of risk because malicious codes or backdoors can be embedded in the software at its creation. U.S. officials have singled out software manufacturers in emerging markets such as, not surprisingly, China.

    "Numerous computer networks around the world, including those owned by the U.S. government, were subject to intrusions [in 2007] that appear to have originated within" the People's Republic of China. ... the [Chinese] Army is "building capabilities for information warfare" for possible use in "pre-emptive attacks."
    1. Re:Some quotes from the article by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Informative
      How about another view on this.

      If you don't want to go there, the short version is that the data for hacking into the power systems is pretty darn weak.

      Since we can't beat up Iran anymore, we have to have somebody to hate.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Some quotes from the article by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

      Intelligence officials now worry that software developed overseas poses another layer of risk because malicious codes or backdoors can be embedded in the software at its creation.

      Perhaps now they will see the value in open source :P Although come to think of it, if the US government outsources its software from other countries, isn't it just prudent to demand for the source code, too?

    3. Re:Some quotes from the article by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a theory, since it is obvious we will never win the "War Against Terror" we need an alternative to keep ourselves busy and afraid with another big, bad enemy of the scale of the Soviet Union. Then we all give up our rights without a grumble. Happy Days are here again, as we fight another Cold War (we understand those) or is it WWIV (ok, make it six).

      The content is too breathless. The words fed us smell like the b.s. we had before on lesser security issues. This all makes me dubious. I find it hard to take this seriously. We have too much incompetence that is too wide spread. Those leading only value ever enlarging cash piles while strenuously waving patriotic flags. It is just too familiar. So it has to be a foreign threat not good old American (U.S.) incompetence?

      Push this too far, we will be taking on an enemy so large it might mean those so used to sending the dispensable off to be killed or horribly injured may join the party. That is, this time it will be close up and very deadly for the even erstwhile avid supporters of the military, albeit previously from afar.

    4. Re:Some quotes from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A smart hacker will never let you know that you got hacked. The ability to cripple the electrically system is extremely valuable strategic capability that should be guarded and only used when there is reason to. To initiate an attack that had no strategic gain and at the same time revealed hacker's own identity and capability is the dumbest hacker. This article about Chinese hacker is so contradictory that it is as accurate as Saddam's Africa nuclear deal report.

    5. Re:Some quotes from the article by dodobh · · Score: 1

      We have always been at war with Eurasia.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    6. Re:Some quotes from the article by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Cannot argue, but I had memory that last week we had a truce that lasted a century. Perhaps it is my memory is failing ... Ah those that love war and the solidarity it brings. Good times are here again for some of us.

    7. Re:Some quotes from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't figure out why the suspicion of UFO's involvement in two major U.S. power outages is less worrying.

  7. Washington is full of pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Here we are fighting this "war on terror" on a bunch of arabs hiding in caves, and a bunch of arabs hiding in iraqi slums who are not a threat whatsoever to the USA while we have the 1000 pound behemoth that is China completely owning our infrastructure through investments, and espionage. The folks in Washington are a bunch of pussies who can not get their priorities straight. Well people we are in for a rude awakening. China has a brand spanking new fleet of nuclear armed subs just sitting off the coat of the USA, THAT is a true threat, NOT a bunch of arabs hiding in caves. World War 3 will start with a conflict with China, not these arabs hiding in caves. Washinging needs to grow a pair and focus it's efforts on China. I can't fathom why we are still in the middle east. I guess it's just a power hunger grab for arab oil.

    I hope the Chinese own Washington's computers and shuts down the Shithouse (Whitehouse) then possibly(?) Washington will grow a pair and get us the fuck out of the middle east to focus on more imporatant issues.

    1. Re:Washington is full of pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the Chinese own Washington's computers and shuts down the Shithouse (Whitehouse) then possibly(?) Washington will grow a pair and get us the fuck out of the middle east to focus on more imporatant issues. But before we rush off and start another cold war let's also make sure that these claims of evil Chinese hackers trying to assassinate the American way of life are more accurate than reports of WMD's in Iraq turned out to be.
    2. Re:Washington is full of pussies by adamchou · · Score: 1

      World War 3 will start with a conflict with China, not these arabs hiding in caves.

      Neither government is stupid enough to ever fight each other. In today's modern global economy, the entire world's economy would go to shit if the US and China went to war.

      The only front that a war with China will take place on is the digital front.

    3. Re:Washington is full of pussies by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Neither government is stupid enough to ever fight each other. In today's modern global economy, the entire world's economy would go to shit if the US and China went to war.

      Funnily enough, that's what everyone in Europe was saying in 1913.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:Washington is full of pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Funnily enough, that's what everyone in Europe was saying in 1913.
      1934 as well. The problem is that when at least 1 country has decided to fight, it will happen. Bush invaded and occupied Iraq on false pretenses. Many did not reason it out beforehand because of 9/11. Yet, the same thing will happen in China. Even now, China is gearing up for war to take Taiwan. They have a number of new nuke subs and are building at a MUCH faster rate than they admit to. These are designed to park off of japan, south korea, and USA to launch nukes. They are indending to threaten US interests when they want to take over Taiwan. Sadly, with US so involved in an iraqi occupation, we will almost certainly not have the ability to stop this BEFORE it gets started.

      One of Americas big advantage is that we were the big kid on the block. But we were expected to use this force WISELY. W. has shown the world that it only takes one idiot to do otherwise. IOW, when China decides to go after Taiwan, many (mostly 3rd world countries ) will cheer for China. Others will sit on the sideline (mostly EU) and wait to pick apart the carcass.

    5. Re:Washington is full of pussies by adamchou · · Score: 1

      Do you have references to support that statement? Even if thats what people did think, the economy in WW1 and WW2 is no where near as intertwined as it is today. There are so many American companies in China and vice versa. Billions if not trillions would be lost from both sides if the US and China went to war with each other.

    6. Re:Washington is full of pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>the entire world's economy would go to shit >Funnily enough, that's what everyone in Europe >was saying in 1913 Funnily enough, the world *did* go to shit...

    7. Re:Washington is full of pussies by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Others will sit on the sideline (mostly EU) and wait to pick apart the carcass.

      You mean, sit it out for the first half of the war while our main rivals for world domination blow the hell out of each other, quietly take over all their markets and business interests overseas, and then get involved late on and claim all the credit and a major say in the post-war settlement?

      Interesting idea. Sounds good, actually. Might work very well. Has it ever been tried before, do you know?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  8. of course by r00t · · Score: 1

    People need to communicate. There is no place to
    draw a line, cutting off more-vital parts from the
    less-vital parts.

    There mechanical protection systems, so you won't
    be making meltdowns over the net.

    1. Re:of course by fluch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The computers which control the plant should be physically separated from the computers which are needed/wanted for connection with the internet. Otherwise you are begging for disasters.

    2. Re:of course by ChowRiit · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure what you're saying, your grammar is appalling, but I think you're trying to say the need for communication means all systems should be networked.

      Why does communication need to be on the same network as the critical systems? Surely critical systems should be kept off ANY system connected to the internet. Hell, even communications should probably be done over a private network/system that isn't integrated with the main internet...

    3. Re:of course by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Funny

      The computers which control the plant should be physically separated from the computers which are needed/wanted for connection with the internet. Otherwise you are begging for disasters. It's more like the trees which grow next to the powerlines should be kept trimmed.
      Otherwise you are begging for disasters.

      Did Hackers Cause the 2003 Northeast Blackout? Umm, No
      http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/05/did-hackers-cau.html

      So China would have to have planted the race condition in a [General Electric] product used around the world, then, using the most devious malware ever devised, arranged for trees to grow up into exactly the right power lines at precisely the right time to trigger the cascade.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:of course by Dersaidin · · Score: 1

      Why do I imagine someone who runs a power plant reading this post and thinking "hmmmm" then modding it +1 insightfull...

    5. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not entirely sure what you're saying, your grammar is appalling
      I'll say... -1, grammar.
    6. Re:of course by kitgerrits · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's quite easy to draw lines.
      Things line Demilitarized network zones, staging servers and protocol filters can do an excellent job of deciding what information goes in what direction.
      Actually bothering to design and implement them is, unfortunately, beyond the interest (and knowledge) of your average factory operator.
      (Yes, I have worked for one)

      They will happily say:
      80% of MD's in the US use a MS SBS server.
      I say:
      80% of MD's in the US don't know the difference between a modem, a router and a firewall. They just want to be able to work from home.

      --
      "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
  9. And the point of the article is...? by adamchou · · Score: 1, Insightful

    China isn't the only country hacking US interests so whats the big deal here? I'm pretty sure we have just as many hackers hacking into not only Chinese systems, but probably every country out there that doesn't align with our interests.

    This just seems like more propaganda.
    1. Re:And the point of the article is...? by jeiler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The US not only hacks into governments that don't "align with our interest," but in all probability with governments that do. Remember, we've had folks kicked out of Israel (and, IIRC, England) for espionage within the last two decades--and these are two of our staunchest allies.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    2. Re:And the point of the article is...? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Yes, and Israel constantly spies on the US as well. Just because someone is your "ally" doesn't mean that they always will be, and I suspect that all countries keep tabs on as many others as they possibly can.

      In the generic sense, there is "nothing wrong with" this, but whatever can get people to realize that outsourcing and free trade, especially with commies like China is bad for us, then I'm cool with attention being brought.

      It's only an issue if they start making stuff up. I'm not cool with being lied to, even if I like what I'm being told.

    3. Re:And the point of the article is...? by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

      China isn't the only country hacking US interests so whats the big deal here? I'm pretty sure we have just as many hackers hacking into not only Chinese systems, but probably every country out there that doesn't align with our interests.

      Yes, but China is known to A) do more hacking than other nations (perhaps because it has more people in general) and B) to do better hacking/cyber crimes than a lot of other nations. Most other nations (example: Nigeria) have people who commit cybercrimes and fraud, but they tend to be far less sophisticated and rely on social engineering a lot. And additionally, the criminals don't tend to be as well organized or work collectively, which is more common with Chinese hackers (possibly because their military coordinates it). That's why the Chinese are a bigger threat: they have more hackers, they are working together and have many more weapons in their arsenal of cyber attacks than criminals in other countries.

      And as for us hacking into others systems, I'm sure our military may do some of that, but our companies don't tend to engage in stealing the intellectual properties of others. Many Chinese companies, however, are perfectly happy to break the law if they can make a quick buck. Just look at their knockoff industry... they do more of that than original thinking.

      --
      Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    4. Re:And the point of the article is...? by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

      I agree, this all sounds like utter FUD. Blame Canada? Oh no, blame China!

    5. Re:And the point of the article is...? by jeiler · · Score: 1

      Espionage (even mutual espionage) has nothing to do with free trade, outsourcing, or socio-political philosophies. We spy on our trading partners, and we spy on countries we've never sent a single dollar or job to--the only difference, actually, is that it is easier to spy on nations that you have an established economic presence in.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    6. Re:And the point of the article is...? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      They have to do with each other in that anything that makes the public leery of the Chinese is going to increase pressure to divest from them.

    7. Re:And the point of the article is...? by jeiler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Every time I hear about divesting from China, I think of this picture.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    8. Re:And the point of the article is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty damn funny that a "Free Tibet" t-shirt would be made in China.

    9. Re:And the point of the article is...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, for starters, we're happily funding all this work by sending billions of dollars over every year by shipping our manufacturing over to China. Quick-- name five purchased items in your home *not* made in China.

      Thought so.

    10. Re:And the point of the article is...? by adamchou · · Score: 1

      but our companies don't tend to engage in stealing the intellectual properties of others

      maybe we just don't hear about it? http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2008/05/tarnovsky?currentPage=all
  10. Ahhh anger at China by Adambomb · · Score: 1

    Why must either the chinese government or the organization involved continuously act so amorally in the pursuit of profit (monetary or otherwise) despite the terrible impact it has on others and ignore any 'outsiders' outcry against their actions.

    oh...wait...familiar that.....sounds like a good chunk of humanity.

    Not saying its not wrong, just putting a perspective stick in the spokes.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
    1. Re:Ahhh anger at China by mi · · Score: 1

      Why must either the Chinese government or the organization involved continuously act so amorally in the pursuit of profit (monetary or otherwise) despite the terrible impact it has on others and ignore any 'outsiders' outcry against their actions.

      This is not the worst thing done in preparation for a (possible) war.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  11. Just wait by LM741N · · Score: 4, Funny

    From now on every instance of government stupidity and incompetence will be blamed on Chinese Hackers. Well, maybe the 13 year old hacker in his parent's basement is finally safe.

  12. power plant + internet = duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are effin' power plant controls accessible on the internet?

  13. It's not just power companies. by westbake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article mentions large scale government, military and industry intrusions. They also mention criminal gangs and others besides China as those responsible.

    This is an odd issue that gives neo-conservatives fits. They like trading with China, so they don't like hearing old school anti-Communist and human rights complaints. They place the interests of large American companies above those of American people, so they don't like hearing bad things about Microsoft. This leads to a large scale head in sand act.

    --
    I am a name troll of Westlake. Visit my homepage to learn why.
    1. Re:It's not just power companies. by Macthorpe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're supposed to switch sockpuppets before you reply to yourself, Twitter.

      Such a basic mistake... I thought that the multiple accounts game was "dreadfully easy"?

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    2. Re:It's not just power companies. by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The article mentions large scale government, military and industry intrusions. They also mention criminal gangs and others besides China as those responsible.

      Why not? If Scientology has managed to infiltrate US institutions then why can't China do it with their forged Cisco equipment at every gateway?
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:It's not just power companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think they couldn't do it with real cisco equipment?

    4. Re:It's not just power companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think they couldn't do it with real cisco equipment? What makes you think people will expend energy answering an AC?
    5. Re:It's not just power companies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Experience. Now shut the fuck up and get some.

  14. "hacked by chinese" by bsDaemon · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be sweet revenge if they suddenly started seeing their government websites reporting "hacked by Tibet"

    1. Re:"hacked by chinese" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously they haven't hacked their way into our earthquake weapon yet.

  15. cyber-attakers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attak! Attak!

  16. You may be more involved than you think you are. by Odder · · Score: 1

    If you run Windows on a cable modem or DSL, there's a good chance your computer is part of a botnet.

  17. We are at war... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When will we finally admit that the Chinese government declared war on us some 20 years ago? Now we are seeing the fruits of the action. Our infrastructure is more vulnerable to the Chinese than to Al Queda, they have been stealing key nuclear and missile technologies, we can't make portions of OUR key IT infrastructure, without Chinese products...the list goes on.

    If you go to any US port, you will find that almost every single shipping container in almost every US port is loaded and moved with a container crane made in China. ZPMC has something approaching a monopoly on container handling equipment. We can't even build the infrastructure to participate in the world economy independently anymore.

    Unfortunately, the actions of the PRC government do a grave disservice to the Chinese people, who I'm sure would love to interact with the rest of the world in a fair (possibly democratic) way.

    1. Re:We are at war... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I have spent too much time in China, and I know you are wrong. The Chinese people are in-line with these kinds of actions, and wish their government would do more (not less). While they love western-esque (I say that because they really only use conterfiets) products, they hold a private dis-dain for western culture. Believe me when I tell you they are not to be trusted. They will do all they can to put a smile on your face, so they can quietly put a knife in your back.

  18. Offtopic by westbake · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm not Twitter and I'll post how I'll do as I please.

    --
    I am a name troll of Westlake. Visit my homepage to learn why.
    1. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a mouthful. Have a cookie.

    2. Re:Offtopic by Macthorpe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm not Twitter Yeah, you are. I'll also mention that I found the two anonymous posts you put on one article on the Register. I'm yet to find anyone who can write "Windoze" with quite the same amount of smug venom as you.
      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    3. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm not Twitter

      Reality begs to differ

    4. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Twitter. And not westbake.

      Windoze.

  19. wake up people by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0, Troll

    When are we going to consider it an act of war and bomb them back to the stone age or at least stop buying their cheap plastic crap (and only buy their useful electronic crap) so their economy goes down the toilet, we can get cheaper oil, and their people sink into poverty and rise up against their opressive government and turn into a democracy? Sounds like a plan to me. We should at least anonymously EMP blast some of their major government datacenters to send them a message.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:wake up people by rhakka · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean kind of like we did with Cuba (minus the EMP bit)? I mean, that works really well, right? Or Iraq? Embargo the heck out of them, and sooner or later those pissed off commoners will throw off their shackels!!

      right?

      So, how do you seriously get to the point where a couple of blackouts and some economic competition justifies bombing around 1 billion people because you're paying too much for gas? Do you kick puppies for training, or are you just born that much of an asshole naturally?

    2. Re:wake up people by wonnage · · Score: 1

      Because when you do that your fat american ass will be sad as all your shit is made in china for a reason - you're expensive and incompetent. Tough luck, lardy.

    3. Re:wake up people by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Wow. Umm. You seriously believe this? That the US can anonymously EMP their data centers? That the US can just stop buying Chinese goods (check out a Walmart - almost everything there is from China)? That we can bomb them back to the stone age without getting hit by at least as much in return? That the Chinese really would respond to outside pressure by turning on their government?

      You are clueless and naive to a degree that is both astounding and frightening. Good job.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    4. Re:wake up people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Umm. You seriously believe this? That the US can anonymously EMP their data centers? Sure they can, haven't you seen Ocean's Eleven?
    5. Re:wake up people by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When are we going to consider it an act of war and bomb them back to the stone age Congratulations. You are doing exactly what the publishers of the article wanted you to do - go apeshit over innuendo. The article had zero proof, but lots and lots of speculation about China causing power outages. You know what speculation is, right? Its just bullshit they want to trick you into believing without actually outright lying.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:wake up people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because when you do that your fat american ass will be sad as all your shit is made in china for a reason - you're expensive and incompetent. Tough luck, lardy.

      We're so incompetent that China is constantly trying to steal our secrets. Sure, perfect sense there.

      Oh, and the greatness of your people in contrast to Americans is that you're skinnier, enjoy a lower standard of living, and are too fucking stupid to exploit cheap labor. Sure, greatness.

      Must suck to be born, live, and die knowing you're 2nd-rate at best, knowing we can blissfully ignore you, but you can't do shit without thinking about us.

    7. Re:wake up people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That big whooshing sound you hear is the GP's sarcasm flying over your head!

    8. Re:wake up people by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      ...cut out the multi-billion dollar toy trade and China's toast. Are you on glue?

      From this site it lists 2007 total imports from China at 321.5 b$, Imports of "toys and games" as 26.1 b$. While significant, I really don't think an 8% change in China->US imports is going to make China close up shop. (This leaves aside the ridiculousness of getting consumers and businesses to collectively say "We're willing to do without or pay more just to shave a few percent off of China's trade." Good luck.)

      As far as the EMP nonsense is concerned, it's possible that such a thing could be done without the Chinese having enough evidence to bring the US to court, but do you really think they wouldn't be able to gather enough evidence to consider that the likely origin and be able to retaliate in kind? Hell, if it's that that easy to avoid being legally busted, they might just do the same in Tokyo or Moscow as well, on the outside chance it was them. I suspect they would more or less ignore it, though. Anything that small (costing a few tens or hundreds of million, or whatever, and causing slight, temporary destabilization) probably wouldn't be worth bothering with in any publicly noticeable way. Maybe an excuse to disappear a few more dissidents, but that's about all that would reach the public radar.
    9. Re:wake up people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm should only be attempted by good writers.

    10. Re:wake up people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would happen if china stopped all exports to America?

      Would the US economy completely fail and fall?

      Would this not be a better tactic as well as knocking out the power grids?

  20. What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by istartedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What kind of un-patched Windows crap is running the power grid?

    Of course the attackers are guilty; but that doesn't excuse foolish security practices. Nevermind bad security on the end-point, or in the software. It seems like the power company, with all its rights-of-way, shouldn't even have to route over the public network. Routing over a private network would provide physical security. Breaking into that requires putting your actual body at the point of attack. Since the power company came before the Internet, I would have thought they had a private network of some kind in place already, or close cooperation with telcos. I guess not.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      What kind of un-patched Windows crap is running the power grid?
      Windows is the only hackable OS / network? You're making an assumption that might not be true.
      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is why is the power grid hooked up to the internet? Shouldn't it be on a closed circuit network?

    3. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by Detritus · · Score: 1
      It's a question of money. How many corporations still operate private networks? Not many. It's so much cheaper to piggyback on the Internet.

      If you are operating a system under configuration control, you can't just apply patches to Windows without a process to test and approve them. Testing can be very expensive, and third-party software vendors may only provide support for their software in configurations that have been tested in their own lab.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    4. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, whilst china may be backing some already good hackers who will be even better with more powerful resources there is no excuse for this happening at all. That is to say the actual blame should lie primarily with the electricity companies. They could have prevented this, they should have, and it was entirely predictable that someone would want to take the power grid offline; terrorists, bored hackers, foreign governments, etc. Companies who have had their servers hacked probably deserve a little more sympathy, but I doubt much more... I'd be willing to bet most had security well under par - security is everyone's responsibility!

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    5. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares?"

      Your sig needs work. It's actually "intents and purposes." And "who cares?" is correct as is. You would use "whom" if "him" or "her" is the subject. "Who" is used for "he" or "she." As such, there's no irony in your sig.

      Just doing my job...

      Grammar Nazi

    6. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by $random_var · · Score: 1

      I think a whoooole lot of sarcasm just flew right over your head.

    7. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by princealvin · · Score: 1

      "for all intents and purposes" would correct your sig line...

    8. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by dw604 · · Score: 1

      they probably just cracked a password with an automated tool... that and it was a guy in russia, going through a US computer, to china

    9. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      With a name like "Frosty Piss" you should have no trouble recognizing a good Karma-whoring when you see it.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    10. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh, a power grid that needs to communicate over long distances. Think your VPN is perfectly unhackable too? How exactly do you expect to get your data to and from substations all across the country? They might not be "on the internet" but they're flowing over the same "tubes"

    11. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by nikolag · · Score: 1

      It is rather interesting that this article, in fact, deals with responsibility of a vendor, and to some extent, efforts of some structures to shift that responsibility away.
      Wasn't that the point of this article, posted on /. yesterday'
      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/31/1323230

      As a meter of fact I am aware that such cases are spread all over many parts of our society. I know that one major (EU and US) ISP/telco provider had to use winNT with certain, 5+ years old service pack until 2005 (and somewhere maybe even now) because control software made by also major provider could not be run on any other OS.

      I am aware that many hospitals, and other institutions have PC's with sensitive data and unprotected connection on the net. Trick is, it is easier to blame the hacker than to take responsibility.
      If one can blame the invisible enemy that could be used in the future, even better.

      --
      Doing a good job is like spilling coffee on a dark suit, you feel warm all over, but nobody notices.
    12. Re:What kind of un-patched Windows crap... by saintsfan · · Score: 1

      consider this-

      1. internet
      2. you on lan using internet
      3. your emulated session to private sub-network
      4. company's critical components, i.e. mainframe based applications

      4 isn't connected to the internet, but you are. too many people often need access to these components either by operational or technological design flaws/constraints. in the end, a targeted attack only really needs to take control of your desktop computer.

  21. Stolen proprietary information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on Slashdot, they were only infringing copyright!

    1. Re:Stolen proprietary information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Obviously China is a magical word to make the Slashdot crowd stop thinking on their own (or has it ever happened?).

      Marvellous, we've got an REAL enemy!

  22. Or.... by thermian · · Score: 1, Insightful

    China is just doing exactly what the US, Russia, England, and every other nation is doing, and has done for hundreds of years, which is stealing each others secrets...

    And the recent power outages are due to badly maintained and or out of date hardware thats not very fault tolerant.

    I might have my cynical head on though.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    1. Re:Or.... by TheHandsomeOne · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine england is morally capable of this kind of thing, though you may wish to single out France here.

    2. Re:Or.... by thermian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't imagine england is morally capable of this kind of thing

      You may find it instructive to research how England got its first tea plants from China. That is possibly one of the finest feats of industrial espionage in history.

      Also, check out the antics of the East India company, and ponder what happened to all that money and power, think it evaporated away and england is all cuddles and sweetness now?

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    3. Re:Or.... by thephydes · · Score: 1

      No, I don't believe you have your cynical head on. You could probably go further and say that the US (or any other country instead of US) just has more sophisticated means of detecting/catching cyber infiltrators, or that they break the news first to "show" superiority or gain a few points. As for attacks on power plants : 1) inevitable at some time or other 2) easier to blame it on some faceless chinese hacker than on poorly designed and implemented security 3) any power plant problem is fuel for conspiracy theorists

    4. Re:Or.... by TheHandsomeOne · · Score: 1

      I was sort of er.... joking. I future I'll flag any instance of feeble humour (what's the ASCII equivilent of a ship's horn?)

    5. Re:Or.... by mateomiguel · · Score: 1

      the proper name for that East India company you're referring to is the DUTCH EAST INDIA COMPANY. That's because it was based in the Netherlands.

    6. Re:Or.... by thermian · · Score: 1

      nope, they were two distinct companies. The english east india company was in direct competition with the dutch one.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  23. Security not a real concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No business or government agency can claim to be seriously concerned about security if they continue to insist on running MS windows on the dekstop.The Air force, for example, is transitioning to thin client desktops because they REALLY CARE about their users getting hacked.

  24. Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Computer hackers in China, including those working on behalf of the Chinese government and military

    Can they prove that? This sounds like regular old corporate espionage -- nothing unusual or even foreign there. Is xenophobia starting to take hold, or are those statements substantiated? No time to RTFA.

    1. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Leaving the question of whether or not they can prove that on the table (I don't know if they can either, and those who do know probably aren't going to talk about that publicly), I'll go to the corporate espionage angle.

      I don't know if you're familiar with how business works in a communist country, or have ever lived in one to see it up close, but I worked for a foreign-owned consulting company in a communist country in East Asia, and a great deal of the companies there are government corporations, in whole or in part. We were importing wide-area wireless networking equipment and re-selling it, but we couldn't import it directly. The actual importer had to be another company, which was a wholly owned subsidiary of... the army. One of our largest prospective customers was a wholly owned subsidiary of... the post office.

      In short, to say it's regular old corporate espionage when you're talking about a communist country is pretty much the same as saying "those working on behalf of the government and military" because most of the corporations are in fact owned by the government or military.

      Just to touch on the power outage issue, that's not the sort of thing corporate spies do. If there were induced power outages, whoever did it had an agenda other than corporate espionage. That doesn't mean it was necessarily China - there are a number of state or non-state entities that might want to do something like that - but it makes corporate espionage highly unlikely.

    2. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's xenophobia.

      If China continues to grow at its current rate - economically, technology, and in terms of its military abilities (militarily? is that a word?), it'll eat the USA and Europe for breakfast in a generation or two at most.

      Brace yourself for a US-led war against China in the mid-term future. This is really just the foundations - the FUD that is supposed to ingrain the "evil Chinese are our enemies" thinking in the general population.

    3. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      In short, to say it's regular old corporate espionage when you're talking about a communist country is pretty much the same as saying "those working on behalf of the government and military" because most of the corporations are in fact owned by the government or military.

      Wow, that is an excellent point. Those damn commies.

    4. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Just to touch on the power outage issue, that's not the sort of thing corporate spies do.

      You must have forgotten about Enron already. Granted, they had some unique motivations (energy in cali was deregulated so they could turn off the power to create artificial price spikes), but I could probably stretch my imagination and name a few foreign companies that would benefit from power shortages in the U.S. ... like Japanese automobile manufacturers!

    5. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Enron manipulated the heck out of the market and controlled energy in ways that led to power shortages, but they didn't go around making attacks on infrastructure. What is being discussed here is not fallout from greed, but actual malice.

    6. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Stop and think about my example. One of the primary sources of competition for Japanese auto manufacturers in the U.S. is locally-based auto manufacturers, like Ford. If those Japanese companies (or even German companies, for that matter) could hire hackers to cut off the power to large municipalities that supported locally-based auto factories, it would necessarily drive up the cost of American automobiles because the power shortages would reduce the amount of time available for production, increase the cost of production, and in turn create a shortage. This would increase demand for the more reasonably priced foreign automobiles, so there could be a greed incentive (increased sales/revenue/stock prices) for the company owners or managers to hire the hackers.

      This sort of tactic would be feasible for any sort of industrialist / manufacturing corporation. Producers of disposable lighters, pencils, computer hardware ... the list is practically endless. Cutting off the power paralyzes the economy, and that's exactly what companies exporting to America want -- increased demand.

      By triggering rolling blackouts in California, Enron did attack the infrastructure. It wasn't their primary goal, of course, but as I said, a lack of power paralyzes the entire economy. We depend on it. Enron preyed on California's economic prosperity for their own gain, and it isn't inconceivable that another company could do the same.

    7. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      Is xenophobia starting to take hold...? You must be new here.
    8. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by emilper · · Score: 1

      Take a breath.

      "those Japanese companies" have their factories in US too.

      "German companies" are moving their toys to US, too. Ever heard about Airbus ?

      Check your statistics ... US is still the largest industrial producer in the world, and US companies own about half of what is manufactured on the whole damn' planet. And if you worry about ruthless industry magnates sacrificing the poor US workers and moving plants to China, look it up and you might discover that lots the shares of the companies that moved capacities to China are paying for someone's retirement.

      Check out the regulations in California and also find out when was the last new power plant built there, then repeat after me "goddamn' Greens caused blackouts".

    9. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      No kidding. In San Diego County, to which my family moved in 1971, the last new power plants were units 2 and 3 at San Onofre (nuclear plant) in the early eighties. The population of the county during that same 25 years has increased incredibly, and a lot San Diego's electricity is now imported.

    10. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blaming the own disability to maintain national infrastructures on foreign nations is something previously only done by states like North Korea.

    11. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is US Government encouraged xenophobia.

      This sounds like the usual US government and their shills blaming the Chinese government for everything that they can't pin on the "terrorists".

      The US is simply prepping us to accept China as the next "enemy" so they can pretend to have a major victory over the "terrorists" just in time to influence the November elections enough so that people will not be surprised when McCain wins.

      Then, the process continues: civil rights in the USA will continue to be eroded, the US Constitution will continue to be ignored, and the US Government will extend its reach beyond its constitutionally described boundaries. More people will be declared "enemy combatants" or "terrorists" for weaker and weaker reasons. Big Brother is coming to the USA.

      I'm posting this as an AC for obvious reasons. I don't feel like being declared an "enemy combatant". I don't want to go visit Room 101.

    12. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, who's to say that US officials aren't doing the same to the Chinese? Is the only difference that the Chinese government simply doesn't admit weaknesses in the same way western governments do?

    13. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      This is just as baseless and hysterical as the original claim that China hired the hackers. Would you guys try not to let your tinfoil hats show so much?

    14. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Please have a look at the documentary "Enron -- The Smartest Guys in the Room." There are taped conversations of low-level energy traders at Enron doing things like calling the managers of power plants and telling them to find a creative reason to trigger a "forced outage."

      Whether or not California has enough power plants today is a separate issue. The fact is that as soon as California let the price of electricity in the state float, Enron used the opportunity to engineer a shortage with their monopoly in order to jack up the price.

      Also, I don't give a fuck "about ruthless industry magnates sacrificing the poor US workers and moving plants to China," you obviously have mistaken me for some sort of altruist like the rest of the baa-baa sheep here. We act like we're capitalists here but we have protectionist, nationalistic immigration and trade policies, and a price floor on labor, designed to prevent foreigners and immigrants from competing in our marketplace. We extol the virtues of free markets and then bitch and moan when markets equalize as a result of globalization. Give me a fucking break. Even you feel like you have to "justify" it by "assuring me" that "good Americans" are still getting the profits. Fuck you, hypocrite.

    15. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      I responded to the other guy. You probably have a point, but there is actually evidence that Enron tampered with the power infrastructure after California voted to "deregulate" energy and allow the price to float in the late 90's, before Enron's bankruptcy in 2000-2001. They started shutting down plants, exporting energy out of the state, and then importing it back in when prices were something like 2000% higher than they had been before "deregulation." It was a brief but dramatic episode.

    16. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      P.S. Your point about the US being the largest industrial producer in the world is irrelevant to my suggestion that hackers could perform a targeted attack on the power infrastructure in a specific municipality. If it were within their power to do that, then they could just figure out what "zones" their competitor's factories were in and cut the power there while maintaining power in zones that their factories operate in. Any company from any country could do it -- after all, if someone were to attack the electricity supply, they would do it in a targeted fashion, they wouldn't just randomly try to cut off power to the entire U.S.A.

      Also, I don't have to "check my statistics" because I didn't actually cite any statistics in my post. And neither did you. So fuck you, you snarky asshole.

    17. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      P.P.S. You are so fucking ignorant that when I said "so there could be a greed incentive (increased sales/revenue/stock prices) for the company owners," you didn't acknowledge that "company owners" is synonymous with "stockholders," regardless of the size of their stake. Hiring hackers, of course, wouldn't be profitable for smaller shareholders in the company, but it could be profitable for a large shareholder, or maybe a small oligopoly of shareholders.

    18. Re:Did Red China really hire the hackers? by emilper · · Score: 1

      so much passion ... I shall take it as a compliment: thank you.

  25. China is well situated. by westbake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The submitter quotes the most frightening parts of the article and our current "trade partner" China is well positioned to spy. We trust them to make equipment and non free software like Cisco routere has proved itself impossible to check.

    Still, most of the hacks are common and anyone could do it. Time and time again we read about autopropagating botnets for Windows and how they cover large parts of the internet. When that system is used on corporate and government desktops, anyone can exploit it.

    --
    I am a name troll of Westlake. Visit my homepage to learn why.
  26. FUD by US Gov by kubitus · · Score: 1

    at least the US governement learned from Billy or is that the Caine example is till around! or the Vietnamese Canon boat attack on US ships or the WTC attack 911 so the next to blame is not terrorists but China who is the next scapegoat - framed or not! who trusts the US??

    1. Re:FUD by US Gov by Enderandrew · · Score: 1
      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  27. When will we retailate? As soon as... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...China gets rid of their nuclear weapons.

    Till then, they get to do as they please, same as any nuclear-armed country.

  28. Re:MIlitary doesn't allow Firefox by purpleraison · · Score: 1

    I wanted to have Firefox installed and use it instead of Internet Explorer 6 (yes, 6), but it is against regulations to have it installed these days.

    Clearly military security is reactive, as opposed to proactive -- sad, but true.

    --
    I am open source, and Linux baby!
  29. Complain all you want... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    What are we going to do to China? Sanctions? Trade Tariffs? Probably just a "stern speech"

    Even if it is Chinese Government sponsored hackers, the american people still want their cheap goods.
    Just like most americans we care more about the price of gas, than what type of government is in Iraq.
    We want fresh fruit picked by illegal immigrants who have no healthcare.
    We want cheap power, but as long as the nuclear power plant is built in someone elses backyard.

  30. solution .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "gained access to electric power plants in the United States, possibly triggering two recent and widespread blackouts in Florida and the Northeast"

    Solution is, don't put your SCADA units on the Internet. And even if this were true the more likely explanation is that they didn't have enough spare capacity.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  31. What really happened .. by rs232 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "a leading trade group, said that U.S. intelligence officials have told him that the PLA in 2003 gained access to a network that controlled electric power systems serving the northeastern United States"

    No, what really happened was the grid was overloaded and the SQL virus was playing havoc with connectivity, then a tree fell over and tripped out a line, which spread in a domino effect all the way to Canada. A similar virus tripped out the control system in a Nuclear power plant.

    http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/cs_20080531_6948.php

    "During the hour before the Aug. 14 blackout, engineers in the control center of an Ohio utility struggled to figure out why transmission lines were failing and complained that a computer failure was making it difficult to determine what was going on, transcripts of telephone communications released Wednesday show"

    http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2003/09/60285

    "Software failure cited in August blackout investigation .. A malfunctioning alarm system may have played a big role in the outage Dan Verton Nov 20 2003"

    http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/info-notices/2003/in200314.pdf

    http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/recovery/story/0,10801,87400,00.html

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  32. Power cut responsible for at least one death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this woman was killed as a result:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1022699/Woman-lived-inside-iron-lung-60-years-killed-power-cut.html

    1. Re:Power cut responsible for at least one death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the woman in the article which says "Authorities said the electrical failure had been caused by a tree falling on a power line."?

      Did Chinese 'cyber-attakers' travel through the internets to chop down a tree and kill her? I'm guessing no.

  33. It does happen after all... by theinvisibleguy · · Score: 1

    I never realized the severity of these articles until a couple months ago my boss noticed someone from a Chinese i.p. trying to get root access to our Linux server. Fortunately they didn't get in but it did make these articles a lot more real for me, we're just a small software company and even we were targeted.

    1. Re:It does happen after all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you and every other computer connected to the internet.

    2. Re:It does happen after all... by emilper · · Score: 1

      oh, so if most of the attacks on my net come from US universities, should I alert the Army and then head for the fallout shelter ? Zombie computers are everywhere.

  34. It sounds like China is saying that they involved by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    It sounds like China is saying that they are involved in our power grid going down when they did not do anything. It's our poor grid setup that took it down.

  35. Re:MIlitary doesn't allow Firefox by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    The answer is to use portable firefox, and then you don't have to install it.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  36. Re:When will we retailate? As soon as... by Drakonik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ding ding ding. We have a winner.

    The concept of M.A.D. is what is keep the world in one piece, and not a giant puddle of radioactive sludge. Thanks to modern intelligence tech, all countries capable of launching ICBMs are also capable of knowing when OTHER ICBMs are launched, within minutes. If one gets launch, then other countries will launch retaliatory strikes, and eventually, EVERYONE will launch their weapons, hoping to at least destroy the enemy before they are destroyed themselves.

    China is a threat to us. They have enough nuclear warheads to pepper every population center with deliciously lethal Uranium goodness, and they can launch theirs five to ten minutes after we launch ours. Considering that an ICBM would take twenty to forty five minutes to travel to its intended target, that's more than enough reaction time. That's why we buy their cheap shit, take their insults and attacks, and let the Communist thing slide.

  37. Re:Microsoft? Windows? by willyhill · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I see you forgot to switch sockpuppets before replying to yourself.

    Maybe we could organize a code bounty and have someone write you a Firefox extension that makes this easy. A combination HTML highlighter (so that you know you already posted in a thread) and account changer. It could be called SockpuppetSlashFox. Or SlashPuppetFox. Or TwitterSlashPuppetFoxSwitcher. Or just pathetic.

    Then you could continue to promote free software in your very special way.

    --
    The twitter monologues. Click on my homepage and be amazed.
  38. "attakers"? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For God's sake Slashdot, get it together.

  39. Deterrence has been beneficial... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ...in preventing global wars, but I fear it is going to end up the same as our efforts to prevent all forest fires. The population grows and grows, and disputes like this little thing mount and mount, until a huge war/fire destroys everything.

    M.A.D. just squashes down the desire to slaughter each other by the millions. Eventually it's going to pop back out of the box with a vengence.

  40. Already losing the next war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only is this administration losing the last war, it's losing the next war as well.

  41. Sucessful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA
    "in a few cases, gained access to electric power plants in the United States, possibly triggering two recent and widespread blackouts in Florida and the Northeast"

    The secret to success is knowing who to blame for your failures.

    Spend a few minutes and think about this. What is there to gain? If China really did it, they completely expose their capability and for what???

    Perhaps the author should ask himself one question. Would you do it if you are in control? That's right my friend!!Exactly!

  42. It is not all windows fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The feds are liars. A number of the network switches that are coming in from China are made with custom chips from China. They are out and out openings that allow China into our network. China is very caustious about using that backdoor. The real problem is that we have so many of these switches in our network, that we would have to replace ALL of them. Slim to no chance of that happening. But the feds keep quiet about because it will cause a sheer panic at a time when about the ONLY thing propping up the market is tech. IOW, Bush's admin and the republicans are lying all the time moving us from one disaster to another. GD their black hearts.

  43. Thank you China by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is fantastic news, and I can't thank China enough for these attacks. The fact is, vulnerabilities in our systems exist whether they are under attack or not. These attacks should serve as a wake up call and lead to security being taken much more seriously. Can you imagine if these weaknesses were left open and were exploited by terrorists, or by some country we find ourselves at war with in the future?

    1. Re:Thank you China by Pasajero · · Score: 1

      Sheez!

      Can't you see China is your enemy? They have actually make you believe you're friends but are taking your money and working skills away.

      Imagine what would happen in a few years when practically everything you use is made in china and they decide not to supply you any more?

      Will they obey agreements, contracts, deals? Hahaha!!!

      The whole world can see it but you!

    2. Re:Thank you China by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      You're missing my point. China's intentions and their future actions are not relevant to what I'm saying. The fact is, by attacking us now in ways that cause relatively minor damage, we will become stronger and better prepared. Those who are doing the hacking don't mean to help the US, but it will be a side effect of their actions.

      China certainly has a looming presence, and they could become a terrible enemy. However, it doesn't have to turn out that way, and I try to keep a positive outlook. Frankly, it's people like you jumping to conclusions that are most likely to make an enemy out of China.

  44. good old propaganda by Gearoid_Murphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've often scoffed at the seemingly obtuse propaganda used by communist nations in their media, to be fair, usa has plenty propaganda too, but this is just laughable, if you read about the North East blackout, you'll see that a bug in a Unix based system was primarily responsible for the failure of the electricity infrastructure to react when it should have.
    Now, if I was a Chinese spy, I'd infiltrate General Electric, install a bug in the operating software responsible for the control of the energy distribution network, wait till those dumb ol americans had got complacent and then, for no strategic advantage whatsoever, cripple their energy distribution network, and then laugh my black communist heart out.

    --
    prepare the survey weasels.
    1. Re:good old propaganda by joocemann · · Score: 1

      You don't know what you're talking about. The Chinese have a brigade-sized element of hackers trained and exercising attacks throughout the globe. If you don't know this, go find out, I'm not lying. Furthermore, you need to look up what the act of espionage is, how such acts are conducted, and what a spy is; your concept is much like the fantasy "james bond" idea that is completely untrue and operationally implausible. Start googling.

    2. Re:good old propaganda by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Frightening thing is, people will actually believe this crap.

      Well, the USA needs an enemy, now that "terrorists" have replaced "drugs" instead of the USSR.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:good old propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now, if I was a Chinese spy, I'd infiltrate General Electric,"

      It's already worse than that. Much worse.

      Haven't you noticed? Every town has Chinese restaurants. These USED to be run by harmless, chubby little old Chinese grandpas and grandmas.

      Not now! Every one I've visited lately has been staffed by 30-something fit Chinese men. With
      short haircuts and good posture.There's someone shouting orders at the others, but I can't understand him. Must be talking in code.

      They're here, just waiting for the word from General Tso to take over.

      I know this, and I'm worried.
      Soon as I finish this Moo Goo Gai Pan, I'm going to take action!

    4. Re:good old propaganda by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a FACT that they attack India on a regular basis. What makes you think we're so special? You live in fantasy land if you think they haven't been probing our infrastructure for vulnerabilities that they can exploit should the need arise. To me, what's frightening is that people will just think this is a bunch of racist bullshit. China takes cyber-warfare very seriously. Unfortunately, we're only just starting to.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
  45. The Red Hacker Army by zunipus · · Score: 1

    The Chinese 'cyber-militia' has a name. It is called the 'Red Hacker Army'. Google them up. From what I have read they were formed in 1998, immediately after China was given 'Most Favored Nation' status by the Clinton administration. Way to go Clinton Cult. The Red Hacker Army has always been funded by the Chinese communist government and are featured frequently, by name, in public Chinese newspapers. Their published exploits are followed and cheered by many Chinese citizens. Remember that the next time you buy Chinese at Wal-Mart etc.

    Meanwhile, back in the USA, the military will only admit exploits by the RHA starting in 2003. And only this year have they begun publicly disclosed counter measures against these attacks that have been going on for 10 years. Way to go Bush League.

    :-P

    I have read comments that the military would not be stupid enough to make secret information accessible via the Internet. Um, sure. Right.

    And that's why the military was ordered last year to begin migration to Macintosh Internet client and server computers. Yup. Someone over there managed to figure out which commercial OS is the single LEAST secure on the Internet. It's you know who...

  46. Looking for a scrap ... by golodh · · Score: 1
    Am I alone in thinking that the good old US of A is looking for someone to have their next scrap with in case Al Quaeda peters out early?

    For about 40 years now all kinds of utility companies have wiped their collective backsides with the idea that any kind of information processing system that has any kind of actuator needs to be thoroughly secured. After all, when was the last time you casually strolled into a waterworks or a power plant? All those things are locked down, if not guarded.

    Has it come to the point that without an "enemy" we cannot bring ourselves to put decent security all IT equipment connected to public utility companies that has actuators?

    Ah well ... I guess that if even the military can't be bothered to maintain elementary password discipline across their IT installations no-one else can.

  47. A So They Know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that GeorgeWalkerBush, CondiRice (GWB's Candy thang) are pedofiles. The reason for the Telecom Forgiveness Act is to cover up GWB's And CR's downloads of porn and their porn accounts ... it has nothing to do with nailing Elliot Spitzer.

    Guess they got the goods on Billie G. and Stevie B. too!

    OOOOHHHHH!!!!!!GGGGGOOOOODDDD!!!!!

    Toodles ;)

  48. I'm cutting through the typical arguments here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUD, who really cares. Basically there are a bunch of other arguments here but essentially this one comes down to the old adage, "business is business," "The hand that bites the hand that feeds," etc. FUD or not, stuff like this more than likely happens depending on the bigger or more moronic targets. Why do you think the whole push for open source. It wasn't just about seeing if someone is spying on you. It's to tweak the software to make it harder for things like this to happen. While it won't make it uncrackable, it does make it more harder for attackers due to the level of diversity existent in the wild.

  49. Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should worth mentionning that the Chinese fluoridate US water supplies too... Ever heard of Dr. Strangelove?

  50. Dumb and Dumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A half brain hacker can cover his track pretty well and led others to believe the origin of the attack wherever the hacker wanted. All this talk about China's hack sound like the dumb had hacked in to dumber's unbreakable network. If we can trace the origin of the hack that easy then whoever is doing the hack is pretty dumb. Or we are dumber than the dumb hacker. I think neither case is truth. All this talk about Chinese hacker is pretty lame.

  51. Nuke the bastards! by gchesney0001 · · Score: 1

    Melt all the lead before it reaches our shores.

    --
    Bite me
  52. Scaremongering by jandersen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The submitter writes as if these things were solid facts written in stone, whereas the fact is that nobody really knows. Sadly, building on what "intelligence" comes out of CIA just isn't feasible, as the arguments for the war in Iraq amply demonstrate. SO, the power outages "may have been caused by hackers" or something; or they may have been caused by something else. We rely heavily on advanced technology, which is a bit like balancing on a knifes edge - it is bound to go wrong from time to time, sometimes massively so, especially when stiff competition makes funding for maintenance less abundant.

    Apart from that, it isn't exactly difficult to break in to this kind of system - in the past we have seen hackers walk all over the place where they aren't supposed to have been. If script kiddies can do it, is isn't surprising if higly trained miltary personnel can do it too.

    But I sincerely doubt that they would leave lots of traces and clues lying around for the more paranoid factions on slashdot to play with. Script-kiddies, yes, but if you are professional, whether criminal or some foreign government, you don't just blunder stupidly in and trigger alarms, or leave your droppings all over the place.

    I can see how this kind of nonsense is politically useful. Hasn't the American public caught on to this yet?

    1. Re:Scaremongering by 0xG · · Score: 1

      Just like "WMD"... Arguably though, China is a far greater threat to the American Hegemony than Iraq ever was. And so, the propoganda war begins...

      --
      A pox on web designers who feel that window.innerWidth == screen.availWidth
  53. they are accurate by WindBourne · · Score: 0, Troll

    Look at how the yuan is tied to the dollar. It is designed to drain us. China's top people are in a war with us. But Bush's admin is the LAST person I want to see taking them on. Obama or Clinton would be superior in everyway. I suspect that both will try to negotiate this first, before escalating slowly.

    W. has screwed us so bad, that we keep North Korea and Cuba on the terrorists list, of which NEITHER have been involved with anything since the 80's and have new leadership, while we have loads of proof that Venezuela is all over the war in Columbia. Yet, we do not put Venezuela on the list because we import too much oil from them. Had W. kept Clinton's battery research going, we would be on electrical cars. Of course, BC killed off Poppa Bush's IFR which was just about as stupid.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:they are accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forget batteries, we need cars that run on fucking idiots. Slashdot has shown me that that's something we'll never run out of, cuz we got plenty here. (Of which you're just one example.)

    2. Re:they are accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no doubt, you are also an idiot.

    3. Re:they are accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The yuan hasn't been tied to the dollar since July 2005.

  54. You couldn't make this shit up! by sean4u · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh wait...

  55. Re:When will we retailate? As soon as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only for as long as it takes to implement full scale deployment of its railgun systems. 200 mile range with 5 meter accuracy, and total TOT control spells... not good; be it for ICBMs, SRBMs or any underground installation ever made, because a five kilogram tungsten/titanium/Depleted Uranium rod is NOT something you wanna meet at 15 miles a second.

  56. ReSomequotes - US gov FUDding US citizen & wor by kubitus · · Score: 1

    Chinese do what US services do since a long time. The US eavesdrops on the world and by Google steers the way people view the world. Echelon serves US ( GB & NZ too ) military, secret services, and companies. Why do you wonder. I bet Cisco has a bootloader for US services in all Cisco routers. ( like Xerox built a camera in photocopying machines for the Eastblock )

  57. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US (actually western world) is AGAIN using their typical terrorist act. When "they" do it for "us" it's terrorist attact, but when "we" do same for "them", it's anti-terrorism.

    ""We" are good and "they" are bad" -mentality is so stupid. Cant US, UK and all other big countries stop that world-wide-terrorism and start taking care on their own country?

    If US makes cyber-attack to china, why china shouldn't do same to US? Because then US does it same back and write some news from it, what someone post to slashdot. Point is not that WHO is guilty for what, but that everyone are supporting terrorism and defending own actions "This is just a war against terrorism".

    If I would have the power of universum, I would build such walls around US, China, UK and many other countries that they could play only with themself and stop terrorising whole world!

  58. Chinese proxies? by dvs01 · · Score: 1

    How is the security on the machines in China? Another way to look at it is that China can be a fat target for bot herding, etc. Just because a connection comes in from China, doesn't mean that it didn't originate from the States.

  59. Oh noes - there's a devastating cyber-milita gap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US must act with all urgency to close the cyber-militia gap with those pesky chinks. If not those pesky russky cyber militias will kill all our chillun and convert us all to godless capitalism. The US must develop multiple independently retargetable cyber-militias to close this gap.

  60. Lonely Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Computer hackers in China, including those working on behalf of the Chinese government and military, have penetrated deeply into the information systems of US companies and government agencies..."

    Sigh. As a Chinese, I only wish my government were so competent. All those with power are so preoccupied with carving up the national wealth that it seems absurd to suggest they'd have any room left in their fat brains to care about hacking U.S. power grids. Yeah, that's how corrupt the communist government is. And the so called "Chinese hackers" might be one of the most overrated entities in the world. It's true that some patriotic nerd can hack "Free Tibet" sites maintained by voluntary work, but infiltrating the U.S. government? Nah.

    I can understand the motivation behind all this China hype. The U.S. wants somebody to fill in the void left by the former Soviet Union -- it must be *so* lonely to stand alone as the world's only superpower. Communist China just happens to be the most promising candidate, with a dictator government, different cultures, and different values. Sadly, in reality China is no where near a rival as the USSR was, and it's highly unlikely that she will ever reach that height before the inevitable downfall of the communist regime. Thus these "cyber warfares" between communist China and the U.S., can only remain in the imaginations of /. readers.

  61. Actually, it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a based on a "formula" that only the Chinese gov. knows. As the dollar drops, so does the yuan (though only slowly). When the euro went up against most other money, the yuan remained steady. When nearly any single money shifts except for the dollar, the yuan is steady. Only when the dollar shifts against all others, does it finally shift. IOW, it is tied to the dollar.
    Also, it is disingenuous to say that it is not tied to it. In doing so, it is similar to say that America's Terrorist list is about terrorism.

  62. oops, my bad by saintsfan · · Score: 1

    "I suspect, as the system went down, the PLA hacker said something like, 'Oops, my bad,' in Chinese." haha had to post it

  63. although funny, you make an interesting point by saintsfan · · Score: 1

    the article alludes to misinformation by the US government... tall trees in ohio and a computer virus were blamed. what is the real truth, and would we ever be able to tell? i agree that a 13 yo script kid could probably pull off the same (depending on the actual circumstances), so how would we ever know?

  64. General William Lord accuses China by Vrst1013 · · Score: 1

    General Lord, Commander of AFCYBER, has gone on record repeatedly accusing the Chinese PLA of large-scale military and economic hacking. The US is never going to present proof, but Lord has more weight than a journalist, beltway consultant or slashdotter. Search on 'General William Lord' && 'China'.

  65. Well done slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are now part of the American propaganda machine. Why would anyone beleive any "Intelligence" information from your country after the UN WMD debacle. pfffft

  66. maybe.... by eatfastnoodle · · Score: 1

    maybe next time levy breaks around New Orleans, the government can blame Chinese for that? I'm amazed by how people here who usually don't trust the federal government, seem to jump to believe what CIA tell you guys this time. Remember slam dunk WMD?