Slashdot Mirror
Firefox 3 Hits Release Candidate 2
Barence noted that Firefox has announced release candidate 2 of their highly popular web browser. You can read the release notes while you download. And since my copy just finished downloading, I guess I'll go install it. I hope I don't have any
Anyone have the actual RC2 release notes instead of just the Ffx3 general release notes?
-dave
http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
Are there any themes or settings where we can set everything back to the way it was? I'd love to look into the new back end features but I hate the new UI.
(I'm one of those guys that still has the single close tab in the upper right corner rather than on each tab).
Wow, the update retroactively screwed up the story submission? That's slick!
I was just thinking, I will have just upgraded by the time I am done reading this po
Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
I guess I'll go install it. I hope I don't have any weasels in my trousers.
I guess I'll go install it. I hope I don't have any eels in my hovercraft.
I guess I'll go install it. I hope I don't have any embarrassing mistakes visible to the entire world, or at least as much of the world as comes here when bored.
Kwisatz Haderach
Sell the spice to CHOAM
This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
This link may help: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_crashes
What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
..that have been around for years such as this one:
,what do I know.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235853
Then I won't hold my breath for this release to me any more reliable or stable than any other from the last N years. Its about time they stopped doing a Microsoft and dicking about with "coooo , its so preeetty" UI stuff and bloatware functionalty that no one needs and starting fixing bloody bugs!
Yeah mod me down fanboys, see if I care, I'm just a user
Just clicked help > check for updates in Debian. Upgraded just fine and is working as normal. :-)
None of us have any, you insensitive clod!
Yes
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080317-firefox-3-goes-on-a-diet-eats-less-memory-than-ie-and-opera.html
http://www.thebrowserworld.com/2008/03/29/firefox-30-beta-4-vs-opera-950-beta-vs-safari-31-beta-multiple-sites-opening-test/
http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/26/cybernotes-browser-performance-comparisons/
What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
If it's gone to late, will it be back?
Yeah, I suck as a spelling Nazi.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
One of the features I'd like to see in Firefox is the ability to "tear off" a tab into a new window. My surfing experience is something like this. It would be nice to be able to right click on a tab, and convert it to a new browser window.
When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
Having one hung tab make the others unusable is not cool, in addition ive encountered a few infinite 'yes-no dialogue' loops attacks that force you to either select 'yes', or force quite-- an attack vector that shouldn't have gone past v0.1a IMO.
It would be great if the plugin authors would get on the bandwagon and update their own code, so many of us can upgrade to 3.x. Hint hint.
Huh? Are you using the same "Firefox" as me?
1. What do you mean? Yes, Firefox 3 isn't compatible with (some) Firefox 2 extensions. But then again, Firefox 3 is a whole new version... and it's still at release-candidate level. I've never had extensions break during an incremental upgrade, for instance. (If they become marked as incompatible, that's the fault of the extension author, who should have set compatibility as 2.* or whatever.)
2. I've never seen that. Normally it just downloads the incremental update and applies it on the next restart.
3. Well many of us happen to like the new functionality of the combined address-bar/search-bar. However, it's trivial to return to the old-style behavior if that's what you want (e.g. this). The same is true of most other changes. Firefox is very customizable.
4. Sorry to hear that it's unstable on your system. On the systems I use, Firefox 3 has been decidedly more stable than Firefox 2. Faster, too. From various things I've read, it sounds like the typical experience is that Firefox 3 is faster, more stable, and more robust than Firefox 2. But, as always, your mileage may vary.
5. Huh? When you try to exit, there is a single confirmation box, which can be disabled. It doesn't pop up "a thousand confirmations". Exaggerate much?
6. Huh? I've never had to re-download extensions when upgrading Firefox (even when installing a whole new version). The only time extensions re-download is when a new version of the extension is available. But... how exactly do you propose to get the new version without downloading it?
I'm sorry that you seem to be having troubles with Firefox. From what I can tell, this isn't a typical experience. Also, note that you're most welcome to keep using older versions if they suit you better.
One feature I haven't seen any release notes or anyone else talk about, is true scaling of web pages. It always amazed me that in this day and age, that the Alt-plus and Alt-minus zoom only scaled the text, not the graphics. Not terribly useful for zooming in on a page, or seeing more of a page by zooming out. Opera has had this for ages (from the start?), and it's not as though scaling images is processor intensive (I've written blinding fast C code to do this, with smoothing, myself in the past).
Glad to see this is finally in Firefox. Hopefully they've fixed a couple of other annoyances I've seen; the random refusal to load pages (that load after a restart, or in other browsers), and the failure of Alt-F search to find things that I can see right in front of me on the page.
Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
What's your solution here? Freeze the extension API forever? It's up to the extension developers, not Mozilla, to make sure they're compatible and mark them so. If you know what you're doing you can bypass this check, but at your own peril.
New versions force you to use new features without providing functionality to back it out even when the user wants it. Eg. The new supercoolsearchbar garbage. I don't want my browser looking though my bookmarks when I type a URL but I don't mind it searching history that clears itself regularly.See, there's this great new search engine called Google.com, and if you go there and type "Firefox 3 disable awesomebar", the very first link describes exactly how to do that. But somehow I get the feeling you'd rather complain about it than actually take it upon yourself to do something about it.
Firefox is the one application i use regularly that I find myself killing using task manager regularly. It either hangs or hogs memory which is only released by restarting. Don't deny or try to explain in excruciating technical detail why the browser slowly saps all your memory if left on a page that refreshes itself regularly. It's a bug. Deal with it. Fix it. Even refuse to fix it. But stop denying there are memory management issues.OK, now it's painfully obvious you're either a troll or haven't been paying attention at all. Every Firefox 3 article I've read since the betas started coming out gushed over how memory management was so much better than in 2, how faster it is, etc. The Mozilla devs publicly discussed in many locations all the work they went through to find and plug memory leaks, prevent circular references in Javascript and extensions from tying up memory, etc.
Again I'm pretty sure you'd rather just complain than actually read about it but your friend Google will help you find plenty of information on this.
There's no graceful way to exit that doesn't pop up a thousand confirmations if you do keep the close tab confirmation active.I can't even parse this one. You leave the tab-close confirmation on, but don't want it to confirm when you close tabs? Whatever your issue here is, I'm sure there's a setting or extension for it if you'd take 2 minutes to research.
I can't download and keep my extensions for future install. I really don't like using up bandwidth downloading the same extensions each time I install Firefox.Right-click, Save Link As...
Firefox USE to be a better user experience than IE. I can't say that anymore and it stinks that I can't. I want my Firefox browser back!What exactly is it about IE you would like Firefox to emulate?
And how does drivel like this get modded "Insightful"?!
Correct, it has been in feature freeze for quite a while and no more changes will be made to the rendering engine.
.. a bug fix not making a release and sitting on a major bug for *4 YEARS*
Listen, if you don't use oldbar, don't suggest it. Because anyone who has used oldbar even ONCE knows that it is nothing but a UI hogwash - the awesomebar's aweful features still remain - they just don't look fancy.
I think it was his little joke, Jerry.
Why you should have all possible options and possibilities on Tools > Options? Why we cant keep the browser itself small and add those features as addons, even the old features what are OLD features. At least you can have the old feature with add-on, and you dont need to take source code and start coding to get it...
Firefox 3 added a new Plugins tab to the Add-Ons dialog. If it's not present for you, I'd suggest starting with a new profile; your old FF2 themes or extensions may be keeping it from showing for some reason...
Beta Beta Beta Beta Mushroom Mushroom
I used to be able to set the bookmarks.html file location in firefox 2. it seems this functionality doesn't exist for the places.sqlite file.
Does anybody have any idea how to share and modify bookmarks between a windows and linux install in Firefox 3 ?
I've tried sharing profiles and places.sqlite between the OS's. Best case i can get is view but can't add any bookmarks in Linux.
Every single time there is a post about Firefox on Slashdot, someone whines about how Mozilla refuses to address memory issues.
1 - Firefox 3 uses far less memory than Firefox 2.
2 - Most "memory leaks" come from poorly written extensions. Turn them all off and check out the difference.
3 - The biggest reason Firefox starts using a slew of memory after a bunch of browsing isn't a bug, but literaly a feature. It keeps fully rendered versions of pages in memory, so when you hhit the Back button, it can pull them up quicker. You can disable this feature if you want.
4 - People have this misconception that they should never use their memory. Unused memory does you no good.
5 - Next time try Google before you post a stupid quesiton.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
To clarify Mozilla's position on the matter:
Thank you for your understanding. :)