Slashdot Mirror


OEMs Looking to Ubuntu for Netbook Market

Anon writes "Mark Shuttleworth provides much more detail today about development of the Ubuntu netbook platform, and says OEMs are calling Canonical when they want to start building netbooks. Channelweb notes: 'It's actually a big deal. For example, Dell CEO Michael Dell has been carrying around an early version of a Dell mini-notebook, and referring to it as the device for the next billion Internet users [...] Asus has become an industry rock star by using GNU Linux to power its Eee PC. HP's niche Mini note runs SLED 10 Linux. The iPhone, of course, doesn't run Microsoft software. Is anyone paying attention in Redmond?'"

224 comments

  1. They are listening by snl2587 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And here comes the next round from a company on it's way out the door and no longer truly innovating: litigation!

    1. Re:They are listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and patents!

    2. Re:They are listening by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe Microsoft will counterattack through the legal system so much as they will have to start giving the licenses away for a much cheaper price.

      A big problem is that Vista is too much of a pig to run on these lightweight machines, so they either give XP or a mobile version of windows away for nothing and further cement their lastest OS's status as a turkey or lose market share altogether.

      It's hard to see a winning scenario here for them, at least until they can develop an OS that isn't so resource hungry. By then it might be too late.

    3. Re:They are listening by amirulbahr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Which raises the question: What are the competition watchdogs around the world going to do about this?

      Here in Australia, ASUS has somehow managed to price its Eee PC 900 with XP Home cheaper than the Linux version by about $50. They claim that it is justified by the difference in storage capacity (12 GB in the XP version versus 16 GB in the Linux one).

      This reeks of anti-competitiveness, yet not a word to be heard from the ACCC (Australia's consumer and competition watchdog).

    4. Re:They are listening by amirulbahr · · Score: 1

      Troll, Flamebait or Funny?

    5. Re:They are listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is out the door. Failing. They haven't innovated for years. How can they sell products and services without innovation? Of course. Now they'll just file a bunch of "give us money" suits. Cuz that's how the courts work.

      Thanks for contributing so much to the community.

      i see the microsoft bash automod still works fine, despite the irrelevance and wrongness of the post

    6. Re:They are listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really trying to suggest that Microsoft intends to "litigate" its way out of its alleged innovationless death-spiral? Why yes, I believe that you are. I believe this because you wrote that.

      It's good to see that the Microsoft-bash auto-mod still works. Really.

      Thanks for contributing so much to the community. Truly "insightful." I hope metamoderators have a field day.

    7. Re:They are listening by Drive42 · · Score: 1

      Funny

    8. Re:They are listening by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Mooronic.

    9. Re:They are listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you post twice in two rambling three sectioned posts? Why yes, I believe you did.

    10. Re:They are listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In France, the EEE PC 900 with Linux isn't even available!!! We only get the XP version... Talk about corporate censorship!!!

    11. Re:They are listening by a.ameri · · Score: 2, Informative

      The ACCC has only so many eyes. If you listen to House question time, you'll see that its hands are full with watching petrol, grocery and child care prices (which the public care much more than say, ASUS Eee PC).

      Nevertheless, the ACCC says: "think a business may be breaking the consumer protection and fair trading laws, you should contact our Infocentre on 1300 302 502 or lodge an electronic complaint or inquiry form
      http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/54217#h2_38

      stupid lame filter.

      --
      -- /* Those who don't underestand Unix, are condemned to reinvent it poorly */
    12. Re:They are listening by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You fail to understand our motivation. Guns are for pansy girly-girl Americans who are scared of everything and want to stand far away from someone who scares them too much when they shoot them in the back (partly so they don't get blood on their frock). Real men fight face to face with knives and fists fully expecting to have to take a bullet, stab wound or hit upside the head. We hate pansy frew-frew behaviour like yours so much we made it illegal here so that even our women would have to act more manly than you.

    13. Re:They are listening by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm right with you on the pansy-ass pussies who are too scared to take a punch to the head. That's not at all what I support guns for. Guns are a last defense against totalitarian government, which is where you're quickly headed in Australia, just a little bit behind the UK.

    14. Re:They are listening by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Totalitarian? Look, I'm sure locked inside your bunker it seems like you have an excess of "freedom", but to those of us outside most of your system is a laughable broken joke. From the Gerrymandering, to a broken and non-uniform polling system, to outrageous financial influence peddling, to political influence in the voting system itself, your democracy is more busted than a whore's hymen. Your patent and copyright laws are some of the most restrictive in the world, you are spied on by the powers at be at will and your government constantly favors the biggest corporate interests over those of the common public. So how are those guns doing for you at preventing the outbreak of totalitarian government?

  2. Of course they do.. by nikostheater · · Score: 0

    Of course they do...they are busy trying to sell Vista,Zune and stuff.... And laughing at the price of the first gen iPhone of course...and throwing chairs..and..feeling sad about Bill leaving Microsoft..

    --
    Bill Gates said:"I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine" My favorite number is 09 F9 11 02 9D 74
  3. Similarities by paulatz · · Score: 0

    Someone thinks people will use WinCE just because it looks like windows xp; but Vista doesn't look like windows xp either.

    --
    this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
  4. Re:I'm looking for buttsex! by paulatz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    OMG!1! It's the first modern-greek-themed porn novel I read

    --
    this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
  5. ASUS Eee PC by murp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, if you read the latest Distrowatch Weekly, they say that Linux on the Eee PC is almost a thing of the past.

    1. Re:ASUS Eee PC by houstonbofh · · Score: 0, Troll

      "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

      Microsoft is in the last stage now.

    2. Re:ASUS Eee PC by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, if you read the latest Distrowatch Weekly, they say that Linux on the Eee PC is almost a thing of the past.
      Which is especially strange since the linux version of every model of the eeePC is outselling the windows version on Amazon. I would say it's the larger hard drive, but the older model linux version is selling better too and it has a slower clock speed than the XP one. I don't know, I don't pay attention to this stuff.
      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    3. Re:ASUS Eee PC by kesuki · · Score: 1

      well, i never trusted Asus in the first place(for personal reasons).

      They've gone to the dark side, the linux version was just posturing, to get microsoft to cave, on pulling windows XP support.

      Let's face it, getting Linux on home broad band routers was pushing it. getting linux on internet only laptops? with touch screen inputs? you can bet microsoft will help those OEMs 'see the light' of putting clunky, windows OSes on their devices.

      At least as geeks, we can promote Linux as a 'desktop replacement' for those people who always come down with the 'latest' viruses and rootkits, or help them turn an 'old junker' PC into a smoothwall firewall to help keep hackers out, and maybe even to keep roommates from coming to fights over P2P downloading by showing them how much better VoIP and gaming works with smoothwalls QoS capabilities...

      when these 'mysterious' OEMs announce their linux products, they'll see the light if balmer has to throw a few chairs around for them to see it.

    4. Re:ASUS Eee PC by VENONA · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...then you are murdered.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    5. Re:ASUS Eee PC by ThePhilips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do not get me wrong - I'm all for Linux. But I guess the mini-notebook producers have put Linux there because they didn't need anybody's permission to do it. First. Second. I think they also tried to provoke M$ to get some bargaining chip in negotiations.

      Now that new market have opened, rest assured, M$ will do anything to grab it.

      After all they already brought XP from dead...

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    6. Re:ASUS Eee PC by notdotcom.com · · Score: 5, Informative

      ..but if you read Linux Format, the cover story this month is the Eee PC and the Eee 900. From (Linux Format's TFA: "A current poll of Eee users shows that only 29 percent are running MS Windows."

      --
      Grandpa: My Homer is not a communist. He may be a liar, a pig, an idiot, a communist, but he is not a porn star.
    7. Re:ASUS Eee PC by tknd · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of people are buying the linux version for the larger SSD and installing Windows xp themselves.

      I've tried the default Xandros linux and it didn't cut it for me. For browsing the net and doing simple things like reading a document it is fine. It will even read your usb thumb drives and other things without issues. But it is hard to customize and does not like you going about installing your own software. I expect that Ubuntu for netbooks will be much easier to customize and will likely be a real replacement for the large laptop or desktop.

    8. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Heather+D · · Score: 1

      It's marketing strategy. Linux helped them get an edge and introduce the older model, now they've got competition and are hedging their position against it. If their competitors get market traction expect Asus to begin pushing Microsoft as the "Mature solution" and probably sell the fact that it runs older games and their DRM'ed media better or some such.

    9. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are winning!?

    10. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's contrary to every other report from the show.

    11. Re:ASUS Eee PC by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is loosing its death grip on the PC market. They are having to drag the loyal customer base kicking and screaming to Vista, and the biggest disruptive product surprises of the year (iPhone and eee) have nothing to do with them.

    12. Re:ASUS Eee PC by compro01 · · Score: 1

      The OS isn't too bad if you ditch the simple interface, though there are numerous better distros to put on it, K/X/Ubuntu at or very near the top.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    13. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you start quoting Gandhi to feel better about yourself."

    14. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ASUS Eee PC is a great machine but would be better with a better built-in keyboard. The ones sold in my city in Canada only supported linux with English or Chinese. No foreign European languages were currently supported by ASUS/Linux at that time according to the Linux/ASUS help screens in the computer

    15. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Probably some sort of deal - we give you Windows for such and such, you push ads for us. Linux got plenty developers but few marketers to compete with Microsoft, it's not so easy to convert one into the other. Still Linux keeps improving so I figure it just means Linux will be a lot better than Windows by the time people realize that it is.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    16. Re:ASUS Eee PC by davolfman · · Score: 1

      Bah! The real games worth running should be just fine on Linux. Viva la DOSBox!

    17. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those distros you mentioned, how did they fare with the eee's wireless and webcam?

    18. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Drive42 · · Score: 1

      B u u u u u u r n!

    19. Re:ASUS Eee PC by compro01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No idea about the webcam (friends have the webcamless ones) but the Ubuntu site[1] says it works out of the box, though not with flash (though the Ubuntu site also has a workaround for that).

      The wifi requires you to download and build the madwifi driver, but it then works fine. Last I've heard, 8.10 should see it work out of the box.

      [1] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EeePC/Fixes

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    20. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you read the latest Distrowatch Weekly, they say that Linux on the Eee PC is almost a thing of the past.

      Which is especially strange since the linux version of every model of the eeePC is outselling the windows version on Amazon. I would say it's the larger hard drive, but the older model linux version is selling better too and it has a slower clock speed than the XP one. I don't know, I don't pay attention to this stuff. It costs less. People are pirating windows.
    21. Re:ASUS Eee PC by InlawBiker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They're losing because they're complacent and huge.

      They do a good job eventually but it's the story of low-hanging fruit. Microsoft is raking is barrels of cash because they can leverage their market position. Now suddenly, BOOM! UMPCs are all the rage. Agile companies like Asus can produce one within a year and Linux is infinitely flexible, especially with Ubuntu on board. They can produce a new distro in a quarter or two.

      It would take at least two years with all hands on deck to produce "XP Light" for UMPC's. They know this so they probably subsidized the hardware on the higher-powered EEE to run XP. Problem solved! Besides, they've spent a gazillion dollars gambling on Vista and the trend towards more powerful computers. They don't want to admit they were wrong.

      But the price is creeping up towards $600 now. The whole point was to make a $300 'Net surfer you can use from your kitchen.

      MS will do their best to not miss this boat but they'll have to subsidize the hardware somehow to bring the price down, or hope people don't mind paying more.

    22. Re:ASUS Eee PC by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 1

      This is really a golden opportunity for the open source community, I think. I've never switched to Linux -- never wanted to, never needed to, and Linux never offered me anything that I wanted that I couldn't get on Windows. But with the advent of Windows Vista, a great many people are unhappy; with the notion of cheap laptops running Windows Vista laughable, and with Windows 7 looking to be like more bloat on top of Vista, there's a huge hole that's opening up in the cheap laptop and computer market.

      Once Windows XP is phased out, then cheap laptop market will have no choice but to switch almost fully to Linux, or else force their users to use a horribly slow version of Vista on hardware that it's not meant to be run on. In the next coming months and years, I hope the prospect of a huge adoption of Linux on laptops could spur excitement in the Open Source community, and the community as a whole can then work together (seperately, but with a common goal) of making an OS that is truly mass-market ready and ready to be rolled out on exactly the kind of laptops that OEMs are looking for -- less PC and more gadget.

    23. Re:ASUS Eee PC by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really usefull, a poll on a Linux biased site asking their visitors what they're running on their eeePC.

      --

      ---
      "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    24. Re:ASUS Eee PC by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not just yet, when Intel releases the Atom it is basically designed to run Linux and not Windows. I posted about this a while back from a link on TomsHardware. Basically Intel were screwed by MS last time round with their Origami platform, so this time Intel doing things their way and partnering-but-not-really-partnering with MS.

      The only Atom chip that can run Vista, apparently, is the highest end one. The one Intel is releasing with a huge price tag. The others will run a version of Linux.

      I think its a good thing, the beginning of the end for MS at the moment, just like IBM or DEC before them, they got too big, too interested in vendor lock-in, and the marketplace shifted away from them.

    25. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1
      Nice article!

      This is the time of the Empire Strikes Back and Microsoft will surely come back a little, but we all know how the trilogy ends...

    26. Re:ASUS Eee PC by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      to get microsoft to cave, on pulling windows XP support.
      It's a hidden bonus of linux that many don't see; merely by existing, it keeps MS on their toes (I almost said honest, but that would be stretching it).

      It's similar to this military historical concept.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:ASUS Eee PC by rtechie · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for that drop-in Active Directory/Exchange/Outlook/Office/Sharepoint that is so critical in most modern businesses today. Linux does not seem to be poised to replace Windows Server in the "LAN server" space, he way NT4 replaced Netware. And Netware was never as big as Windows Server is today. Given that the back-end server isn't going away, and that Linux has nothing like the manageability of Windows, it seems unlikely to me that most companies will be replacing their infrastructure soon. Of course, disruptive technology could change that, but I don't see the drop-in Active Directory/Exchange/Outlook/Office/Sharepoint replacement that Linux would need.

      This requires more elaboration. It is really not enough that Linux has a drop-in Active Directory/Exchange/Outlook/Office/Sharepoint replacement. Nor is it enough if it's free (this is probably actually a bad thing). It must be DRAMATICALLY better than MS's solutions. It must offer far more features and be easier to use. That's exactly what Microsoft accomplished with NT4, and it's what Linux is going to have to replicate.

      So if you want Linux to succeed on the desktop, start working on a groupware package with impressive new features, like "cloud syncing", built-in P2P sharing, built-in webmeetings, built-in PKI that works flawlessly, live document collaboration, out-of-the-box clustering, auto-configuration, easy GUI management tools, etc.

      And don't tell me Linux can win the home desktop without wining the corporate desktop. Tell it to Apple. MS won all desktops because they won the corporate desktop. In large part people buy Windows at home for three main reasons:

      1) First and foremost, it's what they use at work (and for most, at school) so it's what they know how to use and configure.
      2) Any piece of random hardware you buy at Best Buy will work.
      3) It's much easier to get support for Windows than MacOS or Linux, because they might be able to get support from their corporate IT guys. And if not, the guys at Geek Squad know Windows.

    28. Re:ASUS Eee PC by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Now suddenly, BOOM! UMPCs are all the rage. Yeah, it's not like Microsft was shipping Windows on these kinds of devices many years ago. Oh that's right, they ARE. Remember Oragami? MS had this idea years ago, Asus finally managed to do it cheaply.
      The triumph here is not that Ubuntu runs on another platform (it runs on my old XBOX, yay!) but Asus' innovative hardware.

      It would take at least two years with all hands on deck to produce "XP Light" for UMPC's. It already exists. It's called "Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs". It looks to be what they ported to the OLPC. Or they could just run Windows XP. It came out in 2001, people. It runs fine on a 300mhz PC with 256MB of memory (assuming you run in Classic mode). It's a lot lighter than you seem to to think it is.

      Besides, they've spent a gazillion dollars gambling on Vista and the trend towards more powerful computers. They don't want to admit they were wrong. {sarcasm}
      Computers getting more powerful? What a dangerous gamble that is!
      {/sarcasm}

      For about 6 months after Vista's launch, many entry-level PCs could not reasonably run Vista/Aero. This was bad. RIGHT NOW however, most $300 systems you can buy at Wal-mart can run Vista/Aero just fine. I've talked about this before, but I blame the OEMs for not being ready despite YEARS of delays in shipping Vista. The bitching and whining from hardware vendors (you have to make actual new drivers instead of just hacking old Win98 drivers like you've been doing for 10 years) has been a big problem. Despite this Vista has better hardware support than ANY operating system. Yeah, even XP. XP has lousy support for SATA (for example).

    29. Re:ASUS Eee PC by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Not just yet, when Intel releases the Atom it is basically designed to run Linux and not Windows. So I suppose that this and this are just fantasies? I'm not aware of any shipping Linux-based Atom product.

      Basically Intel were screwed by MS last time round with their Origami platform How exactly? The problem was the cost of initial Origami devices. As soon as the price dropped, they became popular. And most of these devices are/were running AMD and Via CPUs, whch certainly isn't MS' fault. Intel simply didn't have a low-power x86 processor available at the time. Which is the void Atom was developed to fill. ASUS' eeePC and other "netbooks" are basically UMPCs with cost-reduction measures, like no touchscreen. But fundamentally they're very Origami-like.

    30. Re:ASUS Eee PC by awrowe · · Score: 1

      No, thats the Zimbabwe version.

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    31. Re:ASUS Eee PC by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1
      This is where I got the remarks from, seems quite sensible to support Linux on the lower-specced, lower-priced systems. Also, the Poulson chipset is based on the i915 chipset - the one that caused a lot of the 'Vista Ready' controversy. I don't know its specs, but they've obviously upped them.

      But what about Microsoft and Windows? Yes, you can run Windows on an MID and there will be MID versions that come with Windows Vista. But a Windows Vista MID will require the expensive high-end version of Atom. While a Linux MID can run on a $45 Atom+SCH system, the same Atom platform for Windows will cost $160. And not only is it more expensive, it also has a 20% higher TDP (2.4 watts instead of 2 watts) than the "Linux" Atoms.

      The only Windows SKU (1.86 GHz) is priced at a 68% premium over the most expensive Linux SKU (1.6 GHz, $95), which means that Windows MIDs will be substantially more expensive than Linux versions. Intel told us that Linux MIDs will debut at a $499 (and higher) price point, while Windows versions will start at $599

      Kedia said that Intel is "working with Microsoft", but he has no idea what Microsoft's strategy for MIDs is. "It will be interesting to see which way they will go. But right now, we really don't know."

      This story certainly sounds different than what we heard at the UMPC launch. Back then, Microsoft's Origami marketing campaign virtually screwed Intel and device manufacturers when it promised a product that had nothing to do with the products that were coming to market. Sounds like you said, Microsoft made promises Intel couldn't deliver. This time, they could so easily decide to do their own stuff instead of partnering so closely with MS.

  6. 2008 is the year by lyml · · Score: 4, Funny

    See, I told you soo; 2008 is the year of linux on the desktop. For real this time.

    1. Re:2008 is the year by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      For a certain stretch of the definition of the word "desktop", I suppose.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:2008 is the year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... if not the desktop, it definitely is the year of Linux on the laptop!

    3. Re:2008 is the year by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've commented on this before in a Previous post. We are not trying to bring about the year of Linux, we are trying to prevent the LAST YEAR of Linux.

      See: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=572739&cid=23648009

    4. Re:2008 is the year by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      "Laptop" is almost a stretch, too.

    5. Re:2008 is the year by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      not really, it may be the year of linux on the cheap ultraportable but even that is far from certain. The 900 series have got the screen size up to the point where using XP is not at all unpleasent and I bet as people realise thier EEEPC can be reformatted to become a standard PC a lot of them will get reformatted by the local geek with a pirate XP CD.

      And I bet cheap ultraportables make up a pretty tiny fraction of the overall PC market. Probablly even a pretty small proportion of the laptop market.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    6. Re:2008 is the year by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      No, it is not the year of Linux on the desktop, but on the laptop...
      Now, some have doubts about the future of desktop anyway...

  7. Is anyone paying attention in Redmond? by sconeu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Is anyone paying attention in Redmond?"

    Yes.

    At least OLPC and Asus are.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re: Is anyone paying attention in Redmond? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Whoops! I though TFS asked "Is anyone paying attention TO Redmond!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re: Is anyone paying attention in Redmond? by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of the up and coming subnotes will have options for Linux and Windows XP, such as the Aspire One, and the MSI Wind

    3. Re: Is anyone paying attention in Redmond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is anyone paying attention in Redmond?"

      Yes.

      At least OLPC and Asus are. They are too busy writing up new patents.
    4. Re: Is anyone paying attention in Redmond? by AlHunt · · Score: 1

      >"Is anyone paying attention in Redmond?"

      I certainly hope not.

      --

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    5. Re: Is anyone paying attention in Redmond? by zaivala · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, neither OLPC nor Asus are in Redmond...

  8. If ya think about it.. by TheDarkener · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It really is pretty simple here - there are those who want overcoded, overprotective, overhyped operating systems. And then, there are those who want to use their computer.

    The eee, Netbook remix, ume-launcher and all OSS-friendly friends fit into the latter. Let's face it - the operating system is slowly melting into the background. Vista, for instance, is trying to kick and scream its way back to the front of your widescreen LCD - but sooner or later, people are going to 'ho-hum' them into oblivion, and get on their Intarwebs the easier way.

    P.S. lolsauce.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:If ya think about it.. by jmcbain · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How old are you, kid? When you say there are those who want to *use their computer*, are you referring to those of us who want to use full desktop applications, like word processors, Matlab, Powerpoint, Photoshop, g++, video games, and Maya? Will be able to *use our computers* on these netbooks? Or do you think the only thing we can do is surf the web looking for lulz? Grow up.

    2. Re:If ya think about it.. by TheDarkener · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm referring to those who want to do the basics - e-mail, WWW, maybe some light word processing - on the go.

      Does that clarify, Daddy? =p

      P.S. lolsauce on the age factor remarks. How petty of someone to assume that people of a certain age group all think a certain way.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:If ya think about it.. by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you know you're enormously in the minority, right? I mean, I'm in there with you, as are a lot of /. readers, but compared to the general public, we're really a very small minority. desktop email/web/photos/mp3s/minor document editing - that's *it* for most people. And who's to say that's wrong?

    4. Re:If ya think about it.. by Locklin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Funny, I write graphics accelerated visuo-motor psychology experiments and collect data using Python, do data analysis in R, and write papers/presentations in LaTeX, all using less of a computer than those netbooks (when I don't feel like being chained to my workstation).

      Maybe you are the one who needs to *grow up* and get over the *clickety clickety* toy software.

      see how fun pointless insults are?

      Oh yeah, get off my lawn!

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    5. Re:If ya think about it.. by thekm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It really is pretty simple here - there are those who want overcoded, overhyped, overprotective, operating systems. And then, there are those who want to use their computer."

      ...I thought I knew what operating system you were talking about until I got to "overprotective" and then you lost me, but I think my head was swapping in "secure" to mean the "overprotective" part, hence the mix-up. You can be "overprotective" and completely screw up security at the same time... like a father that is always barging into his daughter's parties to make sure that everything is safe, yet thinking she's safe at home he doesn't bother her much, so the guys sneak in through the window to get the freak on.

    6. Re:If ya think about it.. by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      I'm referring to those who want to do the basics - e-mail, WWW, maybe some light word processing - on the go.

      you know... pretty much all of the consumer portable market... and desktop for that matter.

    7. Re:If ya think about it.. by Nulifier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think you'll be running Photoshop, Matlab, video games, and Maya on a subnotebook. Subnotbooks are more geared towards the things that Linux does really well and it doesn't do any differently from Windows, like surfing the internet, reading email and word processing. The way that you can get people to be open to trying Linux on their main computer is showing them that it is not just a command line (every non-tech person I talk to thinks it is) and that it is as capable of being the full-fledged OS that we all know it is.

    8. Re:If ya think about it.. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Besides... all the other stuff that the OP was ranting about is done just fine under Linux.

      There's no "secret sauce" to this stuff on Windows.

      Apple perhaps has an edge in the quasi-power-user area with
      media apps that come with nice templates and lots of useful
      "clipart". Trying to figure out what "you're missing as a
      Linux user" really puts the Windows offerings in to the
      proper perspective (relative to the Mac).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:If ya think about it.. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      minor document editing
      Which if they value thier sanity they will want to do with the same package they are already using on thier other machines.

      And maybe that is it for most home users (though I would add at least some level of gaming for many of them) but buisness users are going to want to be able to run whatever apps they use for thier job. I would bet that most buisness users use at least one specialist or internal application. What that application is will of course vary.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    10. Re:If ya think about it.. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The limitation will be the size of the terminal, and not have anything to
      do with whether or not those sorts of apps have been available for Linux
      since when a machine like the EEE would have been considered a beefy
      pro graphics workstation.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:If ya think about it.. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Photoshop -- screen would probablly cripple this.

      Video games -- perfectly feasible as long as you don't insist on the latest and greatest. Zoo tycoon, starcraft and even the 3D rendered ports of duke3D all run just fine (though unfortunately many older games require configuration tweaking to run in 1024x600).

      Matlab -- you wouldn't want to run big similuations but for writing the code and testing with small datasets/low iteration counts it should be fine.

      Maya -- no idea, never used it and have no idea what it's requirements are like.

      and I beleive there are a huge variety of specialist applications that are not all that demanding on system requirements and would be usefull to have with you all the time.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:If ya think about it.. by mweather · · Score: 1

      Which if they value thier sanity they will want to do with the same package they are already using on thier other machines. Then they need to buy another license, or switch to OpenOffice, Gnumeric, Abiword, Koffice, Lotus Symphony, etc. Many of which work just fine across multiple platforms, ensuring they can use the familiar program on whatever computer they like.
    13. Re:If ya think about it.. by the_womble · · Score: 1

      every non-tech person I talk to thinks it is

      Most non-tech people have never heard of Linux

      Those that have think it is developed by hobbyists

    14. Re:If ya think about it.. by joocemann · · Score: 1

      How old are you, kid? When you say there are those who want to *use their computer*, are you referring to those of us who want to use full desktop applications, like word processors, Matlab, Powerpoint, Photoshop, g++, video games, and Maya? Will be able to *use our computers* on these netbooks?

      Or do you think the only thing we can do is surf the web looking for lulz? Grow up. I used to throw that same argument around, until I installed ubuntu on my wife's laptop, tried it on my PC, and discovered WINE!

      I kept wondering when a good number of the quality games in windows, like COD4, TF2, etc, would ever make it to linux, but they are already there! There are loads videos on youtube of people playing games, usually with the same, but sometimes even better performance than on their XP/Vista install!

      I fell in love with ubuntu once I gave it a shot. I can't move my current PC over because I produce music and some of my hardware is so rare that I wouldn't care to deal with trying to make it work; But my next computer will definitely run an ubuntu/linux install primarily, if not solely. I will keep a spare hard-drive waiting for XP Pro just in case a few games I treasure do not run in Wine (though it seems that most do).

    15. Re:If ya think about it.. by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      you know you're enormously in the minority, right? I mean, I'm in there with you, as are a lot of /. readers, but compared to the general public, we're really a very small minority. desktop email/web/photos/mp3s/minor document editing - that's *it* for most people. And who's to say that's wrong?

      Exactly right. With any product, from a vegetable peeler to a house, there are going to be hacks out there who want one with the lot, but everyone else wants something they can afford and that doesn't get in the way of what they see to be of value/what they want to get done. If Linux can provide a simple, cheap, functional interface that allows people to do basic stuff, then it has the right formula. It's definitely on the way there. Actually, I reckon it's there already.

      The fancy-apps that the grandparent referred to will migrate to the system that has users on it. But those apps are not in the majority and are less important than the basics.

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    16. Re:If ya think about it.. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Not sure on the current status but I'm sure at some points copies of MS office came with rights to install it on your laptop as well as your desktop as long as you are the primary user of both machines.

      and of course not everyone cares about staying legit.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    17. Re:If ya think about it.. by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Hey! I write distributed Multi-Agent simulation systems, saving data in SQL and processing it with awk/bash-and-friends to process it in R (including charts). And doing 3D plots with gnuplot...

      Of course papers and presentations in latex are a must (isn't beamer just beautiful!)

      Oh yeah, get off my lawn!

      But I am not that old =oP

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    18. Re:If ya think about it.. by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      If you live on country what does not know what OS is, it might be true. But on Finland, many non-tech people knows what is the Linux, the OS and the complete System, and how it is development and how it is commercialized (distributions) for normal users.

    19. Re:If ya think about it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing this "kid" is plenty old enough since his UID is 1/6th of yours.

    20. Re:If ya think about it.. by initdeep · · Score: 1

      and the day that any one of those product TRUELY outshines MS Office in the corporate world (Exchange sucks ass but it is the de facto standard), is the day people will do so.

      until then, they will want to use the same thing their employers provide to them and that they can easily "acquire" either pre-installed on their mega mart box or through a nice little boxed app they purchase (or not).

    21. Re:If ya think about it.. by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm getting old. How do I know? I get a warm feeling whenever I read 'get off my lawn!'

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  9. Linux critical mass by poopie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure that Microsoft and most hardware vendors are really not thrilled that customers aren't demanding exponentially faster machines with exponentially more RAM and disk space.

    How do you drive customer upgrades to more bloaded OSes when customers are demanding devices with lower cpu/ram specs?

    As the price of systems drops from thousands of dollars to hundreds of dollars, having to pay Microsoft hundreds of dollars for OS + Office licensing becomes a non-trivial fraction of total system cost.

    Also, you can bet that the hardware manufacturer's profits on a $500 device are razor thin. If they can cut $20 to $100 or more off the cost by using Linux, it's worth it.

    So, at this point, I have to wonder whether Microsoft is going to try to converge WinCE code with Vista code for Windows 7 to have a single OS that can run on phones / UMPCs / netbooks / laptops / desktops (or at least the same codebase even if CPUs aren't the same). That's probably going to be hard for Microsoft. I expect they'll try to reimplement apps in silverlight instead.

    1. Re:Linux critical mass by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, at this point, I have to wonder whether Microsoft is going to try to converge WinCE code with Vista code for Windows 7 to have a single OS that can run on phones / UMPCs / netbooks / laptops / desktops (or at least the same codebase even if CPUs aren't the same). That's probably going to be hard for Microsoft. I expect they'll try to reimplement apps in silverlight instead.


      I'm sure that's what they'll want to do, but for Microsoft the chief problem is while everyone else is concentrating on mimimalistic systems whose specs were top-notch six years ago, everything in Microsoft's code base has been going the other way. By the looks of it, they're going to try to reposition Windows XP for low-end systems, because it will run reasonably well on these systems. Vista and Windows 7 are going to be no-shows. There's simply no evidence I can see that suggests that Windows 7 is going to be any less a resource hog that Vista.

      And good luck to them recoding for Silverlight. I think they're going to need it.
      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Linux critical mass by evilviper · · Score: 1

      How do you drive customer upgrades to more bloaded OSes when customers are demanding devices with lower cpu/ram specs?

      Microsoft figured that out 15 years ago... You sell OEMs and customers a nice lean mean OS, and then provide critical security updates which steadily increase the CPU and memory load. That way, your system is seriously dragging, and the next version of the OS, with no such updates, seems reasonably quick compared to your bogged-down old OS.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Linux critical mass by fwarren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, at this point, I have to wonder whether Microsoft is going to try to converge WinCE code with Vista code for Windows 7 to have a single OS that can run on phones / UMPCs / netbooks / laptops / desktops (or at least the same codebase even if CPUs aren't the same)

      Microsofts choices are few

      They can keep selling XP on small devices. But linux is still capable of being scaled down further. Where it goes XP can not follow.

      WinCE cant run real Windows XP software. It does not even compare to what can be run in Linux. No body wants CE. Microsoft has not even offered it as a choice.

      Vista and Windows Seven are two heavy

      Microsoft would be forced to write a new OS or bring back windows 98. WinCE is too different under the hood. It does not even have the concept of "current directory". Microsoft stripped out the mouse API, then realized when it was time to work on smartphones that they needed a mouse API. So did you add it back in. No, they wrote a new API incompatible with the win32 api. They are not going to be able to merge WinCE and Windows Vista.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    4. Re:Linux critical mass by joocemann · · Score: 1

      How do you drive customer upgrades to more bloaded OSes when customers are demanding devices with lower cpu/ram specs?

      Microsoft figured that out 15 years ago... You sell OEMs and customers a nice lean mean OS, and then provide critical security updates which steadily increase the CPU and memory load. That way, your system is seriously dragging, and the next version of the OS, with no such updates, seems reasonably quick compared to your bogged-down old OS. I can testify to your statement. I have an older laptop with 256mb ram and a 6gb hard drive. I Installed windows XP Pro with an intial 1.2 (or so) gigabytes being used by the HDD.

      Then I did updates and brought it up through Service Pack 2... Guess what, my OS now takes over 4 gigs of space on my HDD and I cannot find a single file I can delete (like .cab files that you don't need anymore).

      It bogged down my system so much that I've installed UBUNTU! HAH!
    5. Re:Linux critical mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You'd be surprised at how far down XP can be scaled. 82mb install with microXP, and it runs all of my graphics, modelling and sound application just as out of the box XP would.

      Just because Microsoft won't offer it as an option, doesn't mean it can't be done.

      Same goes for Vista, you can chop it up and have a very useable system which takes up a fraction of the space and resources. I've gotten it trimmed down to 600mb, but that's because I wanted to play with AD, IIS7 and SUA, it could stand to get much, much, smaller.

    6. Re:Linux critical mass by Cato · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This also applies to low end desktops that are still far more powerful than PCs a few years ago - even in the UK which often has overpriced components, you can build a PC yourself for £100 (including delivery and tax, no monitor/keyboard/mouse) = $200 US. A recent PC magazine spec'ed this out and the 'premium' version was only $240 - and at this price point Windows XP OEM is £50 or so, a 50% increase, compared to Ubuntu/Kubuntu which works very nicely in just 512MB. If you are cutting specs to the bone you can run Xubuntu (XFCE) in 256 MB quite nicely.

      Or you can buy pre-built systems for around $250, which also don't include Windows for the same reason: http://www.aria.co.uk/SuperSpecials/Other+products/Arianet+Value+AMD+Starter+?productId=31454 is about $250 US including delivery and tax, and there are other models that cost a bit more.

      Savvy consumers are the real threat here - once people realise they can get PCs for almost nothing that are fine for Internet use (not video editing or 3D apps), there's far more price pressure on Windows and Office. Naturally Microsoft will cut their prices enormously, but there'll be resistance to doing this as much as they need to, which should help Linux on such systems.

    7. Re:Linux critical mass by Mutant321 · · Score: 1

      Moore's law does some funny things. OEMs in partnership with MS have been using it to their advantage for the last 20 years. Now, it suddenly seems to be turning against them.

      The smart OEMs are trying to adapt. MS is backed into a corner. People have been predicting the end of MS's reign for a long time. Sure they've always been behind in the Internet arena, but that's periperheral for them.

      This is the first *sustained* attack on MS's heartland - Windows and Office. With problems at the top (Ballmer still a psycho, Gates leaving), the debacle that is Vista, and their continued inability to make significant inroads against Google, the company clearly has some serious problems.

      And it doesn't seem like they have a way out. The attempted aquisition of Yahoo is a "hail mary" to my mind. They won't go under, they won't even stop being an important part of the IT eco-system, but they'll have to get used to no longer dictating terms sooner or later.

    8. Re:Linux critical mass by fwarren · · Score: 1

      I can see why WinCE would not be offered. It is NOT ready for a knock down drag out fight with Linux.

      I am not sure why they dont offer MicroXP? Maybe they think this XP thing is a fluke and if they don't encourage it to much it will go away?

      Even trimmed down, I don't see that Vista with Anti-virus protection loaded running on a 1gig of ram would be very usable. And forget about 512k. I remember seeing XP on 128 megs of ram and it was not a pretty sight.

      Then again no one is making a UMPC with 800x768 128megs of ram, 1gig of flash memory and puppy linux.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  10. Stop the mind control by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just call it Linux. Calling it Gnu/Linux completely ignores the work that's gone into making Linux a household name. "Linux" is a weird enough name, throwing a little-known water buffalo that nobody knows how to pronounce is disastrous.

    1. Re:Stop the mind control by TheDarkener · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe a new name would be best?

      How about "Tux & Friends" ? :p

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:Stop the mind control by pembo13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can call it what you want. But at least on Slashdot, you should try to be specific.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:Stop the mind control by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't worry, the consumers will be sufficiently confused by there being ubuntu linux, suse linux, fedora linux, mandriva linux and so on. The most damage it could do is that people mistake it for another distro. At any rate, I think GNU/Linux is either redundant or insufficient. "Linux" is enough to identify it, to describe my system KDE/x.org/GNU/Linux would be in order. I think all four are about equally fundamental to me, I don't think I'd run any other three if one was missing.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Stop the mind control by DittoBox · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lets apply that logic to, say, other operating systems:

      - Mhac Oh Ess Ecks
      - Wendoze Mee
      - BeOhss
      - Windows Ultimate Venti Burrito Triple Shot FTW!!!110#cough

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    5. Re:Stop the mind control by arotenbe · · Score: 0, Redundant

      And if you have to call it GNU/Linux, at least get the punctuation right. It certainly isn't "GNU Linux", which would imply that Linux is a product of the GNU project; it even says so on their web site.

      --
      Tomato wedge sperm darts that are Republican.
    6. Re:Stop the mind control by Provocateur · · Score: 5, Funny

      GNU/Linux is the new term to use over a bad breakup. Instead of the tired ol'

      I faked every one of them!

      you can say

      And it's GNU/Linux!

      then you storm out and slam the door. Can be used with soon-to-be ex-girlfriends and/or soon-to-be ex-bosses. Can be preceded with the phrase "And another thing:", which is more effective when spoken quite emphatically.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    7. Re:Stop the mind control by Paaskonijn · · Score: 1

      Mhac Oh Ess Ecks Actually, it's pronounced Tehn, not Ecks.
    8. Re:Stop the mind control by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      But I thought it was Bee Eee Oh Ess? Ahh screw it, I'm shelling out $200 for vista. /sarcasm

    9. Re:Stop the mind control by xant · · Score: 3, Informative

      Christ, could anyone be more self-important than Richard Stallman? There are fifty-two justifications in that FAQ about the fucking name! If you feel that insecure about something, maybe it doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

      I agree with the GP, stop the mind control already.

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    10. Re:Stop the mind control by nawcom · · Score: 3, Funny

      It reminds me of when I was a young little shit-ling arguing over whether that megaman X game was "megaman ten" or "megaman-ex". Then megaman X-2 came out. That's when I decided that I will set afire every marketing co-worker I meet.

    11. Re:Stop the mind control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've never understood why Stallman feels so strongly about the naming thing. GPL says nothing about naming, does it? There are OSS projects being forked and renamed all the time, and nobody gets so angry about it. I mean sure, credit should be given to the where credit is due, but there's no requirement whatsoever for giving it in the name. So that should be the end of it, it shouldn't matter what you call your GNU+Linux combination.

      So dear mister Stallman, just think about it as a fork. OK?

    12. Re:Stop the mind control by the_humeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah no kidding. In terms of the system I'm using, the majority of the files taking up my harddrive space comprising the system are: KDE, x.org, GNU userland, Linux kernel in that order. Should I call my system KDE/x.org/GNU/Linux? It does get a little ridiculuous. You don't see the KDE people advocating this. You don't see the x.org people advocating this, espeically when the sheer amount of space taken up by KDE + x.org on the harddrive dwarfs the amount of space taken up the the GNU userland + Linux.

    13. Re:Stop the mind control by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, so I should call my system KDE/x.org/GNU/Linux? Otherwise GNU/Linux would just imply that you're just using the command-line interface.

    14. Re:Stop the mind control by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      You don't actually need GNU or Linux to run KDE/x.org since those can be run on any unix-like system or even MS Windows

    15. Re:Stop the mind control by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      Agreed that there should be a simple label for it, but that's for the general populace, those who aren't looking for a technical definition. Technically, you should note the distinction, because there is a difference between the kernel, Bash, X, etc, because those are separate parts and should be modular enough to stay separated. That way, you can use a different kernel if you want, or a different graphical environment, or a different window manager, or whatever.
       
      So yes, agreed, they should lighten up, but that's for the general public. Don't forget who normally prowls the Slashdot grounds. :)

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    16. Re:Stop the mind control by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's X, Megaman is referred to as X and there was no Megaman 9.

    17. Re:Stop the mind control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think GNU/Linux is either redundant or insufficient. "Linux" is enough to identify it, to describe my system KDE/x.org/GNU/Linux would be in order. I think all four are about equally fundamental to me, I don't think I'd run any other three if one was missing.


      If you were going to choose just one name out of the major components of the system (KDE/x.org/GNU/Linux), then logically GNU should be that name, not Linux.

      GNU is by far the largest portion out of the four of those components named. GNU is about five times the code size of Linux (the kernel) for example.

      Also ... it is possible to have a GNU/KDE/xorg system without Linux ... GNU/Hurd and GNU/Solaris and GNU/BSD are examples. OTOH a Linux system without GNU/KDE/xorg is practically useless.
    18. Re:Stop the mind control by mweather · · Score: 1

      Just call it Linux. Calling it Gnu/Linux completely ignores the work that's gone into making Linux a household name. Calling it Linux completely ignores the work that's gone into making GNU/Linux.
    19. Re:Stop the mind control by mweather · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the consumers will be sufficiently confused by there being ubuntu linux, suse linux, fedora linux, mandriva linux and so on. They seem to handle the different flavors of Linux and other OSes on their cell phones. In the end it's up to the interface. If it's familiar and/or intuitive, they'll have no problem using it.
    20. Re:Stop the mind control by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Otherwise GNU/Linux would just imply that you're just using the command-line interface.

      Not at all. It implies that you're using that OS that the guy who coined the term GNU/Linux refers to with that term. And that term definitely was intended to refer to all of the GNU project software including - for example - Gnome.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    21. Re:Stop the mind control by the_humeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're using Gnome, then it should be called GNU/x.org/Linux. What if you're using KDE on FreeBSD? It should be called KDE/x.org/FreeBSD, right? The problem with GNU/Linux is that it's awkward and cumbersome (especially if you use the officially sanctioned hard "g" sound, yuck!). Personally, I just tell people I'm using Debian 4.0 and where to get it and be done with it. None of this need for a 10-20 minute dissertation on the appropriateness of Linux vs. GNU/Linux

    22. Re:Stop the mind control by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better calling it Ubuntu or Suse or whatever OS, using "Linux" technology.

      If you generalize all those systems as "Linux", people will (and they now do) get pissed off because of all the differences between the Linux in they eee (Xandros GUI) and the Linux in their Dell (Gnome) and the Linux in their school (KDE) and whatnot...

      Merchandise it as Apple does, "Mac, with Unix tech. inside"... similarly, Ubuntu with "Linux tech inside".

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    23. Re:Stop the mind control by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      If Linux is just a kernel, but synonym for the OS and whole system what comes in distributions, why it's so wrong to use GNU/Linux from OS, when it's the tech specification from it? Should we start talking like browser or music player IS the PART of the OS? Linux is synonym for much greater amount of stuff than kernel or OS. GNU/Linux is for tech people and last time I checked, that Slashdot was for tech people, now it has gone down in few years when most writers try to get "+5 Funny".

    24. Re:Stop the mind control by slux · · Score: 1

      Because we all know the best way to measure the importance of a piece of software is how much hard drive space it takes.

    25. Re:Stop the mind control by kalbzayn · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that no Gnus is good Gnus?

    26. Re:Stop the mind control by CheShACat · · Score: 1
      This all kind of harks back to what Kjella said in a completely different context right at the top of this page:

      "Linux got plenty developers but few marketers to compete with Microsoft, it's not so easy to convert one into the other." What everyone in this argument is doing is proving Kjella correct. A catchy name WILL help gain market penetration; 'Linux' is becoming a recognisable 'brand' and, while it's technically correct to call it GNU/Linux, it will help immensley if coders the world over ease up on this asbergers-like dependency on absolute correctness about this kind of detail.

      The alternative is to peg it on "Ubuntu" as the marketable name... Would you rather intrigued kids were saying "I want to try Linux, I've heard a lot about it" or "I want to try Ubuntu, I've heard a lot about it". Which of these two scenarios is the more unjust? Obfuscating the 'Linux brand' with arguments about 'GNU/Linux' could quite easily lead down this road.

      At the very least, training yourself to just think of it as 'Linux' will help your own sanity. If the market does swell like most of us want it to, imagine how much more of your time, energy and patience is going to be wasted having this argument monthly, then weekly, then daily with an exponentially increasing influx of n00bs?! But, of course, at the end of the day, it's free software we're about , and that extends as far as being free to call it whatever you want :)
    27. Re:Stop the mind control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling it GNU/Linux completely ignores the work that has gone into Xorg and KDE/GNOME and everything else that GNU/Linux doesn't cover.

      At the end of the day Linux is a unusual but reasonable sounding name, GNU/Linux is a crap name and if you want a name to be adopted you need to at least make it reasonable, that is why most people don't want to use GNU/Linux instead of Linux.

    28. Re:Stop the mind control by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      Don't forget who normally prowls the Slashdot grounds. :)


      People who are well aware of what GNU is and what Linux is, and don't need the superfluous inclusion?

      The only time "GNU/Linux" would make sense would be if Linux was primarily used with BSD utils, and someone was packaging it with GNU.

      Since that's not the case, the GNU is implied. Just like how if someone asks what gps nav unit I have I say "Garmin Nuvi 750", not "Navtech/SiRF/Garmin Nuvi 750", but mapping software and gps chip itself is just as important as GNU's userland is to linux.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    29. Re:Stop the mind control by wayward_bruce · · Score: 1

      Just call it Ubuntu, SuSE, Fedora, whatever. Simply drop the entire "(GNU/)Linux" thing. Do you hear people talking about NEXTSTEP/FreeBSD/Darwin OS X? Nope. The name (Ubuntu) means a collection of software. Wanna know what exactly goes into the mix? Feel free to read the docs.

    30. Re:Stop the mind control by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Or... maybe compromising accuracy and integrity for imagined publicity games is actually a PR mistake. It's possible that users like integrity.

      More realistically, It's likely that the only reason why this debate matters is the question of giving / not giving the GNU project attribution for their work on a free OS.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    31. Re:Stop the mind control by CheShACat · · Score: 1

      > It's possible that users like integrity.

      Most of them don't give a shit about integrity: they are, after all currently using Microsoft products. 99.999% of those that do can still spot the huge difference between the level of integrity offered by Linux vs the rest without needing to be obsessive.

  11. What's a "Microsoft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "'...Is anyone paying attention in Redmont?'"

    Ah, ignorance is bliss...especially when you are a monopoly -- and think that you will be forever.

    Their cellphone market is still pretty big...oh, wait, what about Android (and its competitor, whose name I always forget)?

    1. Re:What's a "Microsoft"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, retard? microsoft is on more cellphones than apple is. i guess ignorance is bliss in your case.

  12. what does this have to do with ubuntu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The iPhone, of course, doesn't run Microsoft software. Is anyone paying attention in Redmond?'

    if anyone is a bigger offender of lock-in it's apple. why do slashdotters act like it's some kind of victory? is this about a brand or about freedom as you all caw on about?

    1. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think in the case of Apple, it's the lingering mindset that they're the ailing underdog (which was true for a number of years). I think that as they become larger and stronger, they're losing some of the underdog image, and some people (such as yourself) are beginning to notice that they're just a company, and worse in some ways than the companies we love to ridicule for their success (Microsoft). People as a whole aren't logical. Expecting them to be consistent is further straining credulity, haha.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    2. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      they might lock you in, but at least what they lock you into isn't a flaming turd

    3. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by battjt · · Score: 1, Troll

      My Ubuntu Dell laptop is an open system of open APIs.

      My macbook is a closed system of open APIs. (at least I can guess what is going on, even if I can't change it)

      My w2k VM is a blackbox. I don't have a clue what it is doing or why or how to change it. (and that's why it is sandboxed in a VM)

      Apple is a step better than microsoft from my perspective and it just works where Linux hasn't. It's been a long time of watching Linux develop and my dell ubuntu box still didn't work when I took it out of the box (I had to upgrade to 8.10 and delete the modem driver to get sound and suspend to work.)

      Joe

      --
      Joe Batt Solid Design
    4. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by trouser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My macbook is a closed system of open APIs. The implementation is closed source but the APIs are documented.

      My w2k VM is a blackbox. I don't have a clue what it is doing or why or how to change it. The implementation is closed source but the APIs are documented.
      --
      Now wash your hands.
    5. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      my dell ubuntu box still didn't work when I took it out of the box (I had to upgrade to 8.10 Can I borrow your time machine?
    6. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      It is because we hate Microsoft, and like competition. Either you have only just arrived here, or you really are very thick.

    7. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Apple are far worse than MS in many ways, Microsoft lockin was mainly through technical (e.g changing formats every version) & economic ( offering cheaper OEM versions to MS only shops) means, but Apple go the whole hog and have a stupid legal restrictions too. That said Apple do base a lot of their stuff on OSS software (although they wrap it away and have no intention of open sourcing anything they dont have to).

      So while Apple weakening Microsoft's dominance is good, I'm not sure if id rather see apple overloards to Microsoft ones.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    8. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because the iphone is expanding fast in a once windows powered environment.

      It may be a locked device but I like its simplicity and stability.

      Lastly it is showing the world what a UNIX based platform can do.

    9. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by crhylove · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... Did you ever hear about OS 9?!?

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    10. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Apple are far worse than MS in many ways, Microsoft lockin was mainly through technical (e.g changing formats every version) & economic ( offering cheaper OEM versions to MS only shops) means, but Apple go the whole hog and have a stupid legal restrictions too.

      Lock-in is annoying, but normally something the market can deal with. The reason we complain about MS's lock-in methods are because they are a way of illegally exploiting their monopoly to hurt software producers in other market segments. So long as Apple doesn't have a monopoly, who cares what lock-in strategies they use?

      That said Apple do base a lot of their stuff on OSS software (although they wrap it away and have no intention of open sourcing anything they dont have to).

      Actually, Apple releases a lot of stuff as OSS that they don't have to. Darwin, the subsystem for most of their OS, was licensed via the BSD license when they adopted the code. That means they don't have to publish any of it, so long as they give credit (MS adopted BSD code for their networking stack, and never republished it). Apple publishes Darwin and many other chunks of OSS code because they understand the advantages of doing so. Your assertion that they only give back what they have to is not even remotely supportable. They give back what they think will benefit them in the long term.

      So while Apple weakening Microsoft's dominance is good, I'm not sure if id rather see apple overloards to Microsoft ones.

      If MS's dominance in the desktop OS market can be dropped to 70%-50% the entire industry will change. It will reintroduce competition. Investors will have incentive to dump money into Linux, Solaris, and other competitors because MS won't have the leverage to kill them or artificially break them. MS's inability to break compatibility and this investment will lead to renewed innovation, not the current, stagnant market we're dealing with today. At that point, Apple will have to give customers a better solution than everyone else, or they will not become any sort of "overlord" and probably they will not do so unless they stop bundling their OS and hardware and open source more of their core OS.

      I, for one, don't want to see MS lose their dominance to punish them. I want to see the desktop OS market advance again and give me a number of better products and innovative solutions. Whether it is Apple or Canonical or a combination of many vendors that does it (as it almost surely will be) I just want a non-monopolized market and hopefully that will be enough to stop Apple from gaining a monopoly right there.

    11. Re:what does this have to do with ubuntu? by battjt · · Score: 1

      er, uhm... 8.04

      --
      Joe Batt Solid Design
  13. LIMP by deanston · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OEM such as Dell and HP has always relied on MS to tell them when to upgrade hardware and drivers, but all the time half listen and looking for cheap outs, ergo the Vista flop. They've long lost the ability to innovate or motivate on their own nor understand their users. Linux companies ought to beware of established OEM as partners when they come knocking looking for help on that next sale to bail them out. As soon Ballmer slip a 'We'll give you a Windows XZ for a nickel!', the same OEMs will drop Linux on a dime. And will the same vendor offer dedicated support to help novice users upgrade the ever-evolving OS 3 times a year? To ensure long term success and real Linux traction, whoever the Linux company is supplying the netbook OS must keep up the positive user experience for years, not months.

  14. a case of gaining a different victory than sought? by cptnapalm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems to be the case that, while the Year of the Linux Desktop may never arive, 2008 may be the Year of the Linux n(ote|et)book.

    In trying to compete for the desktop, the open source guys have managed to get a strong foothold on the newest, latest, cheapest portables. Perhaps not the particular victory which was sought, but perhaps victory here would gradually translate into victory on the desktop. If people like what they use most of the time (Linux on the portable), it would be reasonable that they would want the same thing on their own desktops.

  15. iPhone DOES run MS software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [quote]The iPhone, of course, doesn't run Microsoft software. Is anyone paying attention in Redmond?[/quote] http://www.apple.com/iphone/enterprise/

    1. Re:iPhone DOES run MS software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How dare you introduce facts into the discussion. Bad AC. Bad!

    2. Re:iPhone DOES run MS software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more, TFA don't mention the iPhone, is only the apple astroturfing at work.

  16. Is anyone paying attention in Redmond?' by pembo13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What kind of ignorant semi-question is that?

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  17. The link reads like a rant by symbolset · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Like the author didn't find the linux eee booth and decided that was a lack of marketing push, a step on the road to deprecating linux on the eee.

    I don't see this at all yet, and if I did it would not worry me. There are plenty other and bigger OEMs fishing for the premium experience you get with linux on the netbook now. Asus got an early lead but if they want to throw their advantage away and return to differentiating their product only by price and color that is their right. There are more than enough other mfrs eager to push the mindshare across the threshold and bring about the unchained era of personal computing.

    It will be chaotic for a while. That's when the interesting things happen.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:The link reads like a rant by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having used an EEE 900 series with windows (it is my brothers) the experiance felt just fine to me. I could run normal windows applications including some older games just fine and the screen size wasn't a problem for most applications (the only time I had to go into top/bottom scroll mode was for a settings dialog in itunes).

      To a non techie if it doesn't run windows it's not a PC.

      ASUS's default windows install needed a bit of cleaning but that is nearly always the case with machines from the big OEMs.

      I think asus put linux on for two reasons, firstly to make the headline price of the initial model even lower. Secondly to make it clear to MS that they had another option for the machine (load linux from the factory and let people put warez XP on themselves) if MS refused to keep selling them XP.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:The link reads like a rant by locofungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asus got an early lead but if they want to throw their advantage away and return to differentiating their product only by price and color that is their right. There are more than enough other mfrs eager to push the mindshare across the threshold and bring about the unchained era of personal computing.

      Actually I think the eeepc is another example of the fact that manufacturers "just don't get it" when it comes to "free" software.

      The eeepc has a significant number of closed source bits and pieces. Most of them don't work quite the way people want, so people learn how to hack things in order to get it to do what they really want - an example is the popup when you plug in an SD card or USB stick. And then ASUS releases an update that breaks that previous hack and people get annoyed.

      Also, because there are pieces that aren't open, nobody can easily support the factory install. So openssl is still broken and, last time I looked, no fixed package is available. So ASUS are probably finding that it's quite expensive supporting Linux.

      Had they just made the whole thing open then there would rapidly have grown up a "support team" around the factory install. Security issue - within 24 hours the sourceforge project would have been updated. Asus then just need to have someone monitoring the sourceforge project and "backport" any fixes into their official distribution.

      A little more work would be involved if they also want to pull in "improvements" from the sourceforge project. But not that much work.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    3. Re:The link reads like a rant by Excelsior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To a non techie if it doesn't run windows it's not a PC.
      Interesting that you state that as a matter of fact. My non-techie fiance uses an Eee every day and the only thing I've ever heard her say is how much she loves it. Of course, she doesn't even know what a "PC" is. She does know computers don't usually fit neatly into her purse, weigh next to nothing, and start up quickly.

      Further, many non-techies love OSX. I'm not sure where you got your opinion from.
    4. Re:The link reads like a rant by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1
      To a non techie if it doesn't run windows it's not a PC.

      A real "non-techie" would have trouble installing their applications on the Eee. Whereas the Linux version of the Eee comes with a full suite of apps. As the word gets out that the Windows version doesn't really "work" but the Linux one does, guess which version will outsell the other.

    5. Re:The link reads like a rant by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Lets see the standard EEE 900 windows load

      web browser - yes (IE)
      word processor - two, you get both MS works and "starsuite" (which appears to be the new name for staroffice.
      im client - windows live messenget only, but people usually install theese from downloads anyway so thats a non issue.

      so the basics are covered in the default install, it is not as though it is a plain install of windows and nothing else.

      but you are right if thier tech skills are so low they can't work out how to copy an install CD to thier flash stick or share a CD drive over the network and they are too cheap to buy a CD drive to go with the machine they are going to have some trouble installing software. I doubt most of them will have too much trouble finding someone who can helpt them with that though.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  18. Difficult to beat the price by feranick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When user see that they can get more with less money, it's a difficult deal to resist...

    1. Re:Difficult to beat the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      This is how Redmond fights back.

      With viral marketing, astroturf and blogspam.

    2. Re:Difficult to beat the price by feranick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Must be something typical of NZ. In the US, Linux versions are sold out (check Amazon). while there is plenty available with XP. In addition (reading reviews from real users), Linux version works out of the box, while there is nothing useful in the default installation of XP. It'd be interesting to know what are such things you believe being "wrong".

    3. Re:Difficult to beat the price by Akzo · · Score: 1

      Being sold out is an indication of supply not meeting demand, it has nothing to do with the popularity of the product. Amazon could simply be stocking extra copies of Windows XP due to it's popularity while only ordering Linux when requested.

      --
      Sig is for Signature, so you don't have to manually sign every post.
    4. Re:Difficult to beat the price by feranick · · Score: 1

      And I am sure Amazon is so stupid to stock only the version that in principle should sell well, and not the one that actually sells well. If the Linux version is sold out, that means there is demand for it. Why then don't they stock more of the Linux version? Is it because they rather stock the more "popular" Windows version? Bah....

  19. Interface needs a make over by Macka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've tried playing around with the Eeee PC, and while I can see the appeal, the GUI experience is a bit sucky. Gnome as is, just wasn't designed with a screen that small in mind, and it shows with the amount of real estate consumed by control buttons and what not in proportion to the data.

    What's needed is a kind of minimalist mode, where contol buttons and menus don't get in the way, but can be exposed easily and intuitively as they're required. That's going to be a lot of very hard work.

    1. Re:Interface needs a make over by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 3, Informative

      The EeePC doesn't run Gnome by default, and it does run a very minimalist interface. Not minimalist enough for my tastes, but that should be mitigated when the 9" ones come out.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    2. Re:Interface needs a make over by tknd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ubuntu netbook remix or whatever it is called is going to address this by providing a new interface designed for small screens. Ars has a bunch of screenshots and more information. The solution isn't perfect but is in a step in the right direction.

      This (good interface real estate usage) is one area that I have to give credit to Apple for doing very well. Apple interfaces are very clean and for the most part a good use of screen real estate (minimal window border, fewer menus and toolbars). Gnome tends to be a little on the fat side with buttons, menus, and toolbars but hopefully that will start changing with this new market. I do wish that application developers would stop using the default "file" menus as a crutch to stuff things into or stuffing toolbars with buttons all over the place (gimp, open office, old versions of ms office, many IDEs). On small screens that becomes especially annoying since there is no more room to grow the windows.

    3. Re:Interface needs a make over by NullProg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've tried playing around with the Eeee PC, , and while I can see the appeal, the GUI experience is a bit sucky.

      I haven't bought one yet because I need the new wider screen for my wife. When I do buy one I'm following the instructions here:

      http://wiki.eeeuser.com/ubuntu:eeexubuntu:home

      Not to dismiss Gnome or KDE, but try Xfce (No, I am not affiliated).

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    4. Re:Interface needs a make over by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      You mean something like Openbox, Fluxbox, or Jwm on the desktop. You could do that with ease - apt-get install ...

    5. Re:Interface needs a make over by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh my...now even some slashdotters assume that desktop Linux = Gnome?... :/ (Eee Xandros install runs KDE)

      Oh well, I guess still better than computer = Windows...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    6. Re:Interface needs a make over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the EeePC uses KDE, not GNOME:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASUS_Eee_PC

    7. Re:Interface needs a make over by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      EEE runs KDE not gnome, i mean a 4 digiter should know better.

      and the issue is being addressed

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    8. Re:Interface needs a make over by replicant108 · · Score: 1

      Xubuntu runs really well on the Eee. Compiz is super slick and makes the small screen much more usable.

    9. Re:Interface needs a make over by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I've tried playing around with the Eeee PC, and while I can see the appeal, the GUI experience is a bit sucky. Gnome as is, just wasn't designed with a screen that small in mind, and it shows with the amount of real estate consumed by control buttons and what not in proportion to the data.
      I own a Eee and I will tell you right now, the Eee does not run Gnome.

      The default setup runs a IceWM as a window manager and Asus Launcher (a tabbed based interface made by ASUS just for the Eee).

      What's needed is a kind of minimalist mode, where contol buttons and menus don't get in the way, but can be exposed easily and intuitively as they're required. That's going to be a lot of very hard work.
      Eee already does that. I honestly don't believe you have actually played around with it with the things you have mentioned.

      Here are some people who have really played around with the Eee
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  20. Re:The Year of Netbook Linux is here by WeblionX · · Score: 1

    So, as a computer engineer, I have to graduate to Photoshop?

    --
    (\(\
    (=_=) Bani!
    (")")
  21. Re:a case of gaining a different victory than soug by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I guess what I'm a little worried about is if the market perception becomes that Linux is only good for small portable computers/cell phones/etc, that the larger distros will stop paying as much attention to the desktop.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  22. Re:The Year of Netbook Linux is here by lupis42 · · Score: 1

    You know, probably 90% of all work done on computers is done in one either in a basic office app, (like Word, Excel, or Powerpoint), a browser (like Firefox, IE), an email and scheduling program (like Outlook/Notes), or a frontend for a server side app. That goes double for the in-browser apps. Not that there's anything wrong with the heavy desktop publishing stuff, but netbooks have nothing to do with playing, and if anything, I think it more likely that workplaces like mine will graduate to them then that users will graduate from them. After all, the hardware required to do Photoshop and heavy desktop publishing is mostly wasted on office apps, and is very expensive. Oh, and please don't talk about professional quality software. Professional quality software means nothing to me. I'm a professional, is the software I use "Professional Quality"? Some of it is downright crap, but I use it because changing now would be very difficult. Some of it is awesome. There is no correlation between profitability of the producer and quality of the software.

  23. mmm now all makes sense by indi0144 · · Score: 0

    Right now I'm writing this from an IBM Thinkpad A21m Using Ubuntu 8.04. Right in Live CD mode, Ubuntu configured all of my hardware, even Wifi, the mic, infrared can detect an old phone, No Wonder why Ubuntu have been chosen.

    It's a dual boot, having the choice of Win 2K pro, Now I'm planing to install Wolvix in there, I have not so much problem with the speed in Ubuntu .. 256Mb should be enough for everyone (I know I need 512Mb but believe me it runs fine).

    BTW I'm using Firefox 3no beta, no RC.. Updated just an hour ago! Why I haven't seen an article on this here? http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/6682/ff3gb5.png

    1. Re:mmm now all makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Re:The Year of Netbook Linux is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This comment disregards the whole point of these sub-notebooks:

    Photoshop -- on a 10" screen? Really?
    Apache -- running on a laptop? Perhaps as part of development...
    Desktop publishing -- see Photoshop comment. Hard to do page layout when you can't see enough of the page.

    As far as Office goes, again, you're missing the point. Sub-notebooks are fine for creating quick docs and even presentations, but the real work is to be done on a desktop with a much larger display.

    Software engineering is a *great* use for this type of system. vi isn't all that resource hungry. :)

    Sub-notebooks are for people who want to carry ready access to a few simple functions: web, email, quick document editing and the like. This are to augment your full desktop, not replace it.

  25. Sounds good, but Dell should do more by realmolo · · Score: 1

    Dell has the bucks and "political" power to get some of the big commercial software packages ported to Linux.

    Maybe they can convince Adobe to port all their stuff. If Linux had the Adobe apps (and Flash, for God's sake) and Quicken, that would go a long way to filling the major gaps in the software library.

    Of course, there is still the problem of games, but I think that is becoming less-and-less of an issue as consoles take over the market.

    Hell, Dell should just *buy* Canonical, and spin off their own version of Linux that fixes all the usability problems that make it not-as-good-as Windows for general desktop use.

    1. Re:Sounds good, but Dell should do more by nawcom · · Score: 0
      To have flash on FreeBSD would be great. Hell, they don't need to port it, then just need to open the source, or perhaps make it so part of it remains closed, but the player itself can be compiled for different OSs. I'm sure I'm dreaming there. Flash 9 is the number one reason why I still keep rebooting back into Linux; it plays a big role in the internet right now.

      With Dell getting involved in Ubuntu development; I'm not sure if that would be easy since they would have to follow GPL and associated licenses. I'm sure they would love to make a linux kernel with their name on it, but closed source? nope, can't do that.

    2. Re:Sounds good, but Dell should do more by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Dell has the bucks and "political" power to get some of the big commercial software packages ported to Linux.

      I don't think they have the expertise. I'd bet on Sun, IBM, Sony, or HP before Dell at managing to do this well.

      Maybe they can convince Adobe to port all their stuff. If Linux had the Adobe apps (and Flash, for God's sake) and Quicken, that would go a long way to filling the major gaps in the software library.

      Adobe is very, very resistant to change. For the most part they seem to have liked and encouraged the Windows monoculture, even going so far as to buy up software companies making good money selling non-Windows solutions and then killing the non-Windows versions. Right now they seem confused as to what to do. MS is bundling more and more competing products with their monopoly and slowly squeezing the life from Adobe's offerings in those markets. At the same time, Apple got tired of Adobe's poor support on OS X and started providing their own competitors, in some cases doing serious damage to Adobe's share in those markets. So Adobe seems to want to punish Apple, by supporting OS X less, and at the same time stop MS from holding all the cards... but they haven't figured out how. Someone there could wise up and launch a company-wide effort towards Linux, but I doubt it. Frankly, I think they're going to lose share on both ends gradually becoming less and less relevant as new companies, Apple, and MS all start eating away at their markets until they collapse and are bought up (probably by MS or less possibly Apple) or they reinvent themselves around whatever products they still make that still have any relevance. Right now, their ability to make strategic decisions seems to be nil.

      More likely the gap will be filled when some company invests in Linux native, OSS solutions to compete with Adobe apps.

      Of course, there is still the problem of games, but I think that is becoming less-and-less of an issue as consoles take over the market.

      I don't think so. The big market for games on the PC is the casual gaming market. The entrance of consoles (okay the Wii) into that market will probably expand the market more than it steals it. That said, the casual gaming market does just fine on OS X, with the Sims and other such huge, sellers. As the Linux market grows, these game makers will target it as well.

      Hell, Dell should just *buy* Canonical, and spin off their own version of Linux that fixes all the usability problems that make it not-as-good-as Windows for general desktop use.

      You're assuming Dell can buy it. It's a private company founded by a rich 'weirdo' on a mission. It's possible, but by no means a foregone conclusion that Dell could buy it. They'd probably be better off contracting Canonical or IBM or someone to create customized solutions for their systems, at least until they gain some experience.

    3. Re:Sounds good, but Dell should do more by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Flash 9 is the number one reason why I still keep rebooting back into Linux
      Why aren't you enabling Linux binary support in FreeBSD's kernel and running the Linux version of Firefox with the Flash plugin instead of dueling booting with Linux?
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  26. Netbook Specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wonder whay you can only by the lowest end of the netbooks with linux on them.
    I want the top range HP netbook with 2 GB RAM, and the 60GB flash drive AND SLED10 please! If you deduct the cost for windows, about $100 that puts it at about the same price as the entry level Windows one with the 160GB spinning platter HDD.

  27. We'll know next year by russlar · · Score: 1

    If people stop saying "This is the year..." next year, we'll know that this year really was the year.

    Until then, it's still just a meme.

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
    1. Re:We'll know next year by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Then we can use it in the past tense when we want to sound like old codgers

      "It was two thousand and eight, the year of the Linux desktop ... I was just a young pup at the time, didn't know the difference between a DLL and a bash script but we didn't care, times were simple and we had all we needed to be happy. I remember sitting down on that old dock at the fishing pond with my seven inch EEE PC. Damn but that thing was small ... only sixteen gigs of storage is you can believe that ... sixteen gigs! But I didn't care, times were simple after all ..."

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  28. People in Redmond WA are paying attention by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do you think the Gates Foundation has sold so much Microsoft stock?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  29. geotalk linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.geo-talk.com

  30. Re:Ubuntu by Khaed · · Score: 1

    Pretty much everywhere and easy to use?

  31. Re:a case of gaining a different victory than soug by nawcom · · Score: 0
    Then use another distribution? I guess I don't understand what there is to worry. As long as there is x86/x86_64 support in the linux kernel, desktop software will get developed. Using one distribution over another doesn't affect a certain program's dependency-wise. I'm an active Slackware coder myself, and if there's a linux program that only comes with lets say Ubuntu, like that Synaptic manager, and for some strange reason i want it on my Slackware distro, i just compile it and its dependencies, and throw it into a Slackware package.

    If you are talking vendor support wise, I can understand. Drivers for more wireless cards might be opened up, but it doesn't mean another vendor will open up a pci TV card driver.

  32. Re:a case of gaining a different victory than soug by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

    A perfectly valid point of concern. I think, though, that at least some of the larger distributions, like Debian, would almost certainly remain.

    To go somewhat off topic, the one concern I have is that the hardware companies start doing the Tivo and lock down their machines so they only do certain specified tasks. This would certainly be something a bit off on the horizon, but even the potential demise/greatly increased cost of a general purpose computer makes me anxious.

  33. Razor thin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most of these companies (asus, acer, etc) are taking in 10-20% profits. Nothing razor about those. But no sense in throwing away money. If they can lose Windows AND have a better platform, then they will do it. Finally, These are chinese companies. They all want to remove the American influence. Once MS is gone, it will be pretty easy to remove Intel and AMD and other American companies.

  34. Paying for codes by NotZed · · Score: 1

    Of course, it means they have to pay for the licenses for the codecs.

    Perhaps every sale even sends a little bit of money to M$.

    Nice way to leverage the free cost of free software while at the same time selling out to proprietary interests and immoral anti-competitive laws like patents.

    Although it was a one-off payment, they even got some money out of the Samba team. Novell are long gone. It seems they're the ones (proprietary interests) dictating the terms under which free software is now developed and used.

    --
    _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
    \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
  35. Not just Netbooks... by dominique_cimafranca · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here in the Philippines, we have full-sized laptops going for $400, the cheapest they've ever been. Not Via processors, mind you, but dual core. Not just no-name brands, either, but Acer and Lenovo. And they all ship with some version of Linux or other. I've seen units preloaded with Ubuntu, and the horribly named Linpus is very popular with Acer notebooks.

    However, it's likely that once the buyers bring the unit home, a bootleg version of Windows gets loaded on it. Linux is preloaded just to show that the unit is working.

    On the other hand, netbooks aren't really living up to the name. They're coming in with more memory and more disk space -- case in point is the Deep Blue H1 (not sure what the designation is in other countries): 1GB memory and 40GB hard disk, and all of $300.

    1. Re:Not just Netbooks... by miscz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Linux is preloaded on such machines mostly because Microsoft "convinced" the governments of many countries that no computer should be sold without OS to reduce piracy. Manufacturers get around those laws by preloading Linux and even sometimes FreeDOS - seems that they have a good sense of humour :)

  36. Define win by mrwolf007 · · Score: 1

    Is everbody using linux the "win"-situation?
    Well, i also offer it preinstalled as an alternative to windows (and even add the propritary gfx drivers and some user-wanted software).
    On the other hand i dont usually recommend it.
    I dont really like the idea of selling linux, i prefer to use it.
    Someone with no linux knowledge will probably just be coming around to often asking for help (you know the time and money thing?).
    I give advice freely in the local lug, but this just doesnt really scale into a pc-shop.
    And you know the goddamn thing about it? Probably linux will win the sub-notebook market and the mobile phone market just as it won the router market, but nobody will really notice or even bother or even know whats its running.
    Face it, we are weirdos doing things most people dont understand and thus often enough fear.
    People dont usually understand what i do when i look in to dsl router via telnet. Not even when i drop to cmd to figure out the ip address via ipconfig. Stuff that looks weird, but well, thats what the "guys who get the thing to work do*".
    You think youll look less like a weirdo if do that stuff on a phone or subnote?

    *Call it Hacker/technical personell/whatever

    1. Re:Define win by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linux was the intial factory option on the EEE which was one of the first cheap subnotebooks.

      But now on the EEE series windows is availible from the factory and runs very nicely. I would imagine once people realise that for a little more (or even a little less in some cases) they can get the familiar XP and use thier familiar appliacations while also getting the micro form factor and of course avoiding vista the EEEPC 900 with XP will look like a very attractive option.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Define win by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is everbody using linux the "win"-situation?

      For me the "Win" is having an open enough environment that you can use most software without "Having" to use Windows. Like the IBM PC eventually became. I also think Vista is Microsoft's "Micro-Channel Architecture" which was IBM's last attempt at lock in. It seems to be doing about as well. :)

  37. They needed no permission by symbolset · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is exactly it. Manufacturers are learning that if they ignore the WinTel platform definitions and just give us the good tech that makes sense, we'll gobble it up.

    Some of us will even think of new and clever things to do with it. It sounds scary, but that's where you build the brand values that matter in the long run.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  38. Microsoft not interested by juventasone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I imagine Microsoft is being short-sighted and deciding they don't want to promote another platform like Windows Mobile that will never sell a $300 Office or any of their bread and butter.

  39. anyone paying attention in Redmond you ask? by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  40. Typo in Summary by Obsidian+Butterfly · · Score: 1

    Is anyone paying attention in Redmond?

    More like, is anyone paying attention TO Redmond?

  41. Re:Celebration a bit premature? by arstchnca · · Score: 1

    I was GOING to complain about snl2587's unique combination of "zero content post" plus "score of insightful," but that injustice pales in the face of the one before me. You see, I just couldn't live with myself knowing that I didn't do EVERYTHING IN MY POWER to let you know:

    You suck.

    Or is this poorly executed anti-linux rhetoric some sort of pro-linux troll?

    --
    -- arstchnca
    --
  42. Can and can't by symbolset · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The nettop is not intended to replace your laptop. That is what your "desktop replacement" laptop is for.

    The nettops are way cooler than that and if you would get out of your "can't" rut you could probably think of a few applications in your life that are worth the three hundred bucks to you.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  43. Re:Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    How can a scripting language suck cum from an anus? It doesn't have a mouth, lips or lungs.

  44. Ugh by solune · · Score: 1
    Frankly, I've never been a big fan of Ubuntu. Maybe my brain is wired funny, but the last time I looked at it - about 8 months ago - I just didn't like it, and especially Gnome.

    Yes, I admit it, I'm a KDE fan. It's a helluva lot easier for me to tweak it to my liking.

    As much as I like it, though I have to admit, for what I mainly use my computer (photography) windows (shudder) works best.

    I still haven't figured out how to calibrate my monitor in linux.

  45. Re:Celebration a bit premature? by snl2587 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was GOING to complain about snl2587's unique combination of "zero content post" plus "score of insightful,"

    Save your personal attacks: I'm not the moderator, and the post was never intended for an "insightful". At all. I had just spent seven hours doing full Windows re-installs on a server pool so, frankly, I was a little anti-Microsoft.

  46. Re:a case of gaining a different victory than soug by nosfucious · · Score: 1

    Linux has always done well with Servers. Thanks in no small part to the Techie/Admin.

    Low end consumers at one end, and a constant battle for the hearts and soul of the server. I guess the middle ground is (eventually) going to have pressure from both ends.

    --
    Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
  47. exactly what the oems ordered by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

    i can imagine the oems really grasping this opportunity to get away from microsoft. if one considers that ibm even sold off their notebook business to get out of their contract with microsoft, the emergence of a new market must be a god-send to the oem of today.

  48. Re:a case of gaining a different victory than soug by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

    What desktop? My Xandros EEE is my main computer now. If I find an external TV card for it, I have no reason to boot up the old desktop anymore. It's just taking space.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  49. For those who don't want to bother to click by spitzak · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is mentioned 4 times in the linked-to article:

    With iPhone 2.0 software, iPhone does even more for your enterprise. It supports Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync, delivering push email, calendar, and contacts.

    With support for Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, PDF, JPEG, and now iWork, attachments can be viewed exactly as they were designed to.

    And now that iPhone has built-in support for Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync, users get all the benefits of push email.

    Support for Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync and industry-standard corporate security standards allows IT professionals to seamlessly integrate iPhone into their corporate environments.

    Whether this counts as "running Microsoft software" is hard to say.

  50. "the iPhone doesn't run Microsoft software" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares? There are all sorts of other mobile phones that us silly mainstream people use running Windows Mobile - and guess what, they cost a lot less and do the same things! I'm guessing that means people in Redmond are paying attention.

  51. Re:Ubuntu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It doesn't have a mouth, lips or lungs. Just import them.
  52. That is why choice is good by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    You can be sure that there will be at least one distro aiming any ninche, no matter how small. By the way, wasn't Linux only good for the server?

  53. That's a big if..... by crhylove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wasn't particularly enamored with the distro pre-installed on the eee. Other than a nice webcam and skype implementation (which is not FOSS, so really, what is the point?), I found it a big cludgy, unnecessarily kid like, a little unreasonably slow, and basically not nearly as clean or simple as standard Ubuntu, OS X, or Windows XP. Now, if they put out a Linux eee clone that was even cheaper, and ran faster and basically looked and felt like a clean XP install.... Then, yeah, I think people would enjoy their Linux time and want to use the OS again in the future. In it's current implementation, it was much better than sugar, but I'd only rate it somewhere in between windows 98 and mac os 9 in it's feel and speed and look. Not a very high mark on my scale.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  54. Re: anyone paying attention in Redmond? =Nintendo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. Re:a case of gaining a different victory than soug by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1

    Debian, one of the largest Linux distros (maybe the largest), is completely community driven. It will have desktop support as long as there are programmers using desktop computers.