Slashdot Mirror


Text-Messaging Behind the Wheel

theodp writes "TIME interviews 21-year-old Taylor Leming, creator of the 600-member Facebook group I Text Message People While Driving and I Haven't Crashed Yet! While Alaska and Louisiana just became the latest states to pass laws banning text-messaging behind the wheel, Virginia resident Leming is still happily texting away while driving despite some near-accidents. 'Sometimes it just seems easier to text 'Be there in 5' instead of calling,' explains Taylor."

83 of 517 comments (clear)

  1. Darwin by j_sp_r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it important to text that you'll be there in 5 minutes anyway? You can also wait 5 minutes.

    And I hope when he crashes and kills himself he doesn't take others with him. Driving and calling (even hands free), texting, or doing anything else (tuning the radio, setting up your nav system) for that matter is just dangerous.

    1. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      God: Where are you?

      Idiot: Be there in 5 mins.

      CRASH!! BANG!!

      Makes sense to me.

    2. Re:Darwin by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 5, Funny

      God: Where are you?

      Idiot: Be there in 5 mins.

      CRASH!! BANG!!


      God: That didn't seem like 5 minutes to me.

    3. Re:Darwin by Daengbo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Driving and calling (even hands free), texting, or doing anything else (tuning the radio, setting up your nav system) for that matter is just dangerous.

      My taxi driver the other day was obsessed with his nav system while driving me home -- He was playing solitaire on it. If I had been able to communicate with him, I would have cursed him out.

    4. Re:Darwin by gemada · · Score: 5, Funny

      The best example yet of this occurred here in Canada. A teenage girl was driving her parents' minivan and got into an accident while texting her boyfriend.....and here is the kicker....HE WAS IN THE BACK SEAT!

    5. Re:Darwin by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God: Where are you?

      Idiot: Be there in 5 mins.

      CRASH!! BANG!!


      God: That didn't seem like 5 minutes to me.


      Idiot: I didn't die immediately!

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    6. Re:Darwin by cyberwench · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And yet, barely anyone gives a second thought to tuning their radio while driving or talking to a passenger while driving - both things that are shown to create just as much of a distraction.

      I don't think there's anyone out there who never ever deals with distractions while driving. Having a sandwich, drinking something, changing tracks on a CD, driving while not having enough sleep... everyone does it on one level or another. All of it is dangerous, but the only thing that seems to get people keyed up is cell phone use. Can anyone explain to me why?

      --
      ~ Leilah
    7. Re:Darwin by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People who use their phones while driving don't grasp how dangerous it is.

      I'll tune my radio on the road, but only when I'm in a clear patch when nothing is happening at the moment. I also take as little time as possible to do so; all of my favorite stations are programmed into buttons, so it just takes a moment, and doesn't take much attention.

      The same is true with my passengers. When the driving gets tough, I will stop talking to them, often in mid-sentence.

      But people who use cell phones on the road don't seem to understand these ideas. They will frequently place the cell phone first, driving second. They won't interrupt their conversation for a difficult section of driving, they won't try to minimize their conversation, and to compound it all they frequently have only one hand free for actual driving, which means less steering control and poor or nonexistent use of turn signals.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    8. Re:Darwin by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 3, Funny

      it took him 10 seconds to decide if he wanted to send the text message. linky

    9. Re:Darwin by brownsteve · · Score: 5, Funny

      The girl's name is Taylor Leming. This cannot be a coincidence.

    10. Re:Darwin by Stickerboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >And yet, barely anyone gives a second thought to tuning their radio while driving or talking to a passenger while driving - both things that are shown to create just as much of a distraction.

      I don't think there's anyone out there who never ever deals with distractions while driving. Having a sandwich, drinking something, changing tracks on a CD, driving while not having enough sleep... everyone does it on one level or another. All of it is dangerous, but the only thing that seems to get people keyed up is cell phone use. Can anyone explain to me why?

      Mostly because it's the bigger idiots that try to text message while driving. There seems to be a tiered system of stupidity while driving. On one level there's the eating a sandwich or sucking on a soda pop or leaning over to tune the radio. On a higher level of idiocy, there's the people reading a newspaper, doing makeup, driving without your seatbelt, and texting or calling on a cell phone.

      Unlike talking to a passenger, who should have a nominal idea of what's going on in traffic, the person on the other end of a call has no sense of when they should shut up or avoid bringing up issues requiring heavy thought. I have no problem with someone making an essential short call when it's safe to say, "Hey Dave, the meeting is canceled today. See you", and then hanging up. It's just that most people who I actually see talking on their cellphones in traffic aren't that bright, and continue to natter on forever while they're swerving and stomping on their brakes.

      The title of the Facebook group says it all about the people who text message while driving. "Haven't died, yet!" Congratulations... you win the dumb luck award? Soon to turn into another Award?

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    11. Re:Darwin by socsoc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    12. Re:Darwin by Drakonik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because to use your cell-phone for texting, you must look AWAY FROM THE ROAD and at a small screen to read texts.

      When you're talking to a passenger, yeah, you're distracted, but talking and listening does not require that you take your eyes off the road. Nor does adjusting the radio, once you're used to using it.

    13. Re:Darwin by bhtooefr · · Score: 2

      OK, seriously, I need a source for this shit.

      That's just slightly too hard to believe.

    14. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is why (just picked the first relevant example from 30 seconds' Googling):

      http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080602/lf_nm_life/driving_cellphone_dc

      Almor also explained that when applied to the visual task of driving, the results show that simply using hand-free devices are not very helpful.

      "This isn't getting through to many legislators," he said, adding that with driving talking on the phone is also different from talking to someone in the car.

      "When you have someone sitting next to you they are acting as an extra set of eyes, something that a remote person can't alert you to."

      The person on the other end of the phone can't see what's going on, and won't know when they need to shut up. Additionally, it takes more brain power to decipher speech coming over a crappy digital connection than when it is coming from somebody who's right there, so the distraction is actually far greater.

    15. Re:Darwin by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pedant is also a noun.

    16. Re:Darwin by Gewalt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      6 billion years didn't seem like a week either.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    17. Re:Darwin by xZgf6xHx2uhoAj9D · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People who tune their radios while driving don't grasp how dangerous it is.

      Seriously, your post comes off as a bit condescending. "Other people who do something seemingly safe are too stupid to realize that it's dangerous. But when I do something seemingly safe, it's because I'm smart enough to know that it actually is safe!"

      That's fantastic that you only do it when you're on a barren straightaway and only press one button. Phone talkers who only phone while on straightaways and only press one button to do it (speed dial) can make exactly the same argument. Guess what? It's still dangerous. Changing the radio station while driving is dangerous. Period.

    18. Re:Darwin by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why couldn't you SMS him? Did you at least try to ask him for a phone number? After all, he's right there.

    19. Re:Darwin by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't want to discourage you from being a skeptic. By all means, be a skeptic. ;^) But did you even read what he said? He said, "Canadians". ;^p

    20. Re:Darwin by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know what else is dangerous? Driving.

      I'm not saying that I'm safe while other people are not. I'm saying that there are things you can do to limit your distraction and reduce the danger of the activity. The problem is that people who talk on cell phones while driving by and large do not do these things. Some of them do, and are thereby reasonably safe, and I have no problem with them.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    21. Re:Darwin by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But people who use cell phones on the road don't seem to understand these ideas. They will frequently place the cell phone first, driving second.

      Sorry, but that is nonsense.

      Using your mobile (cell)phone whilst driving is illegal over here, because our Orwellian government passed a law against it. I don't think it's sensible. Before that, I did talk on a phone whilst driving and you know what? I was able to put the mobile phone SECOND and driving FIRST. What makes you think that the class of drivers who are unable to prioritize tasks properly are limited exclusively to those using a mobile phone whilst driving?

    22. Re:Darwin by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you think that the class of drivers who are unable to prioritize tasks properly are limited exclusively to those using a mobile phone whilst driving?

      Absolutely nothing at all! There are plenty of worthless drivers out there, both with and without cell phones.

      However, most people using cell phones on the road will be this worthless sort. Why? Well, first, because most drivers are this worthless sort, period. Secondly, because people like you and I will generally make short calls out of necessity, whereas this worthless sort of driver will make constant long calls. Thus the odds are extremely high that any given driver on a cell phone is a worthless moron who can't prioritize.

      Yes, there are people who can do it responsibly, but they make up a vanishingly small proportion of the population.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    23. Re:Darwin by Fjandr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Phone talkers who only phone while on straightaways and only press one button to do it (speed dial) can make exactly the same argument. Guess what? It's still dangerous. Changing the radio station while driving is dangerous. Period.

      Talking on the phone engages your attention for a continuous period of time. A half-second to push a button != several minutes of distraction. Not saying the momentary distraction is not dangerous, but it does not even come close to approaching the level of danger that talking on the phone while driving presents.

      Text messaging is even worse though, since it requires the concentration to produce the text mentally (much more thought intensive than speaking naturally) and some form of error correction (or worse, watching your phone constantly as you enter text). Sadly, these people don't always have one-party crashes. If they only killed themselves in car crashes, I'd be fine with it.

    24. Re:Darwin by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Text is a noun, not a verb.

      Welcome into the English language. Any noun gets turned into a verb, adjective, whatever else that's not a noun, verb or adjective, and it's been like this for a while.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    25. Re:Darwin by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cell phones impair driving, and that's why cops should be able to pull anyone on the phone and behind the wheel. They take your attention away from the road, reduce your reaction times, and usually tie up one hand. You may think you are some kind of amazing driver who can do both at once, but like everyone else who says the same thing, you're not. That's my point.

  2. Idiot by jrothwell97 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    despite some near-accidents

    Enough said.

    Also, just because someone hasn't had an accident in the past, it doesn't mean they won't have an accident in the future.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    1. Re:Idiot by iPodUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. If they've already had near accidents then it's just a matter of time until something bad happens. And so help me if they crash into me...

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Idiot by tonycheese · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did ANY of you actually RTFA (including the person who submitted it???)? Clearly, the group was created as a joke and she said in the article that she supports the law even if it would be hard to enforce. She says that although she does do it sometimes, she realizes it's stupid and dangerous and would follow the law if it were to become one.

    3. Re:Idiot by jrothwell97 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But surely if she considers it irresponsible, she shouldn't do it, EVEN if it is not specifically illegal?

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    4. Re:Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. People like her are the reason why religion exists. Let me explain. Despite her reason and common sense telling her that it's not a good idea, she's going to continue doing it simply because "it's not illegal." The only way to get her to actually change her behaviour (and that's a big maybe) is to have some sort of "punishment" go along with the action.

    5. Re:Idiot by kirbysuperstar · · Score: 3, Funny

      But surely if she considers it irresponsible, she shouldn't do it, EVEN if it is not specifically illegal?

      Bit of a case of "do as I say, not as I do". And don't call me Shirley.

    6. Re:Idiot by wk633 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I would support [a law], however, because I consider myself to be a pretty good law follower and would feel pretty horrible if something happened because of me breaking a law."

      Yeah, because something bad happening because you do something you know if fucking stupid would be ok.

      What, she'd only feel bad if she killed someone while doing something 'against the law'?

      Idiot.

    7. Re:Idiot by skiingyac · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot states have laws like this. In DE, my wife got rear-ended (lightly) by some teenager when coming to a stop at a red light in good weather (she was not the first car to stop and didn't brake hard or anything), and his explanation was basically "sorry, I didn't see you".

      The trooper gave him a ticket for "inattentive driving". It didn't matter whether he was texting, eating, or whatever else (he claimed he wasn't doing anything), because he obviously wasn't paying attention to what he was doing. I'm sure it didn't help him that his insurance card was expired, it was a weekend, and my wife was pregnant, but the necessary laws do exist.

      The problem is enforcement is hard until they hit somebody.

  3. Kids these days by iPodUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't believe these people! What's so "fun" about text messages? Why the aversion to real communication? I'd much rather talk to someone than exchange emoticons while risking the lives of those on the road around me.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Kids these days by jrothwell97 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In my experience, this is how people carry out such short conversations.

      Party 'B': Hello, B speaking.
      Party 'A': Hello, it's me.
      Party 'B': Hello, A.
      Party 'A': Whereabouts are you?
      Party 'B': I'm just walking past the music shop opposite the church. Where are you?
      Party 'A':I'm walking past the hotel. I'll meet you at the swimming pool.
      Party 'B': OK, see you later. Goodbye.

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    2. Re:Kids these days by Yosho · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree. I just don't have time for text messages. It can take an hour of back and forth to have a two minute conversation. I can barely put up with IM, but it is required in our office so that people can interrupt your train of thought if you accidentally get on a productive streak.
      I have no "text plan" on my phone, so incoming texts that I didn't ask to receive cost me 15 cents. Outgoing don't cost me anything because I don't do them. I don't have time. Life is too short for text messaging. Call up, get your conversation done and move on.

      As you honestly don't seem to understand the use of text messages, I'll explain why I find them useful: for communicating small amounts of information that don't require conversation, and out of respect for the other person's time.

      Let's face it, most people don't want to be interrupted whenever they're doing something. You might be out shopping for groceries, visiting a friend's house, or eating a restaurant, and you probably have your phone with you in case there's an emergency and/or you need to call somebody, but you don't want somebody to call you and suddenly want to have a conversation. Heck, at least in those situations you can talk if you want to; you can't exactly answer your phone and have a conversation at all if, say, you're watching a presentation at work, or if you're already on the phone with somebody else.

      When you get a text message, rather than answering your phone immediately, you can view it at your leisure, and it only takes a second of your time to read it. I can tell my girlfriend, "working late tonight, I'll be home in an hour," or my D&D buddies, "On my way, be there 30 minutes," or a couple of my coworkers, "Meet for lunch at Rudy's BBQ", and it only takes ten seconds of my time and effectively none of theirs. I can even send the same message to half a dozen people at once, and that's much faster than calling half a dozen people and repeating the same conversation every time. If, for some reason, they need to answer the message, they can also do so without disturbing any people around them who don't want to listen to somebody chatting on their cell phone.

      Does that make more sense? Yes, text messages are a horribly inefficient way of having a conversation, but they're not for conversing, they're for disseminating information.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    3. Re:Kids these days by L0rdJedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since I wasn't logged in at the time, here's my post again:

      As you honestly don't seem to understand the use of text messages, I'll explain why I find them useful: for communicating small amounts of information that don't require conversation, and out of respect for the other person's time.

      Let's face it, most people don't want to be interrupted whenever they're doing something. You might be out shopping for groceries, visiting a friend's house, or eating a restaurant, and you probably have your phone with you in case there's an emergency and/or you need to call somebody, but you don't want somebody to call you and suddenly want to have a conversation. Heck, at least in those situations you can talk if you want to; you can't exactly answer your phone and have a conversation at all if, say, you're watching a presentation at work, or if you're already on the phone with somebody else.

      Ever heard of voicemail? If I'm somewhere where I can't answer the phone and I get a call, I simply let it go to voicemail. If it's that damn important, leave a short message. If the voicemail notifier goes off, I excuse myself and check it. Otherwise, I figure I can call them back later.

      If I ever get a text message asking me a simple question while I'm in the grocery store, I would probably be 1) pissed because it just cost me $0.15 and 2) pick up the phone and call the person back. Pick up your damn phone and call. I will decide if your call is important enough at that time to take. If it's not and I'm really busy, it can go to voicemail. Most people have enough sense to realize that if it's really important, they'll either leave a voicemail or they'll call back right away a second time.

      When you get a text message, rather than answering your phone immediately, you can view it at your leisure, and it only takes a second of your time to read it.

      Who says I have to answer my phone at all, even when a call comes in? Again, that's what voicemail is for. If I decide your call is important or I'm not doing something important, I'll answer. Otherwise, go to voicemail. And that one second is one second more than I want to not be looking at the road.

      I can tell my girlfriend, "working late tonight, I'll be home in an hour," or my D&D buddies, "On my way, be there 30 minutes," or a couple of my coworkers, "Meet for lunch at Rudy's BBQ", and it only takes ten seconds of my time and effectively none of theirs. I can even send the same message to half a dozen people at once, and that's much faster than calling half a dozen people and repeating the same conversation every time. If, for some reason, they need to answer the message, they can also do so without disturbing any people around them who don't want to listen to somebody chatting on their cell phone.

      Ten seconds that you're not paying attention to what you're doing. With all the groups you mentioned, you should be able to call one person and let them know and then they can tell everyone else. Sure, it takes a little longer, but if you've got a bluetooth headset with voice dialing, at least you'll be looking at the road and not your damn phone.

      YWhy even text 5 or 10 people if they're all waiting in the same place? That makes even less sense then a short, 1 min phone call to tell one person "Be there in 5 mins". If that one person can't let everyone else know, then maybe they're just retarded.

      Does that make more sense? Yes, text messages are a horribly inefficient way of having a conversation, but they're not for conversing, they're for disseminating information.

      Yes, and we all know that everybody uses every piece of technology exactly the way it was always intended to be used. In short, no, it doesn't make more sense.

  4. Get a phone and bluetooth headset by trolltalk.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What a moron!

    exting away while driving despite some near-accidents. 'Sometimes it just seems easier to text 'Be there in 5' instead of calling,' explains Taylor

    With a bluetooth headset, I say the person's name, my cellphone dials the number, I say what I have to say, and never have to fumble around with the phone.

    Any bets on how long before this guy gets his darwin?

    1. Re:Get a phone and bluetooth headset by ozbon · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you'd RTFA, you'd know that "this guy" is actually a girl.

      TIME's Sarah N. Lynch contacted the group's founder, Taylor Leming, 21, of Round Hill, Va., who submitted her responses via e-mail

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    2. Re:Get a phone and bluetooth headset by AmaranthineNight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I think you missed his point, which was that driving with a headset has been shown in studies to be no less dangerous than driving with a phone in your hand while you are talking to people. The "hands-free" wasn't the problem, the problem was that being on a phone and carrying on a conversation is distracting, whether you're holding it up to your ear or not.

      I'd like to see a study done on whether talking to somebody in the passenger seat is just as dangerous as talking on the phone (handsfree or not) while driving. Because if it is just as dangerous to talk to a passenger, then really they can either ban talking in cars (imagine the outcry) or stop passing laws against doing other stuff in cars (talking on a cell phone). Although the texting thing is definitely a no-brainer.

  5. Moron by smolloy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I hope her first accident, the one that teaches her how dumb and selfish this is, only injures/kills her and no one else.

    I also hope her insurance company reads time.com.

    1. Re:Moron by owlstead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You learn or you die, you cannot combine the two. Anyway, I hope she crashes and just seriously damages the car, with the insurance company not paying out. There is no reason to wish her harm just because she (at 21 years old) makes some stupid mistakes.

    2. Re:Moron by mrbah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That last part is actually a very good point. With employers checking up on prospective hires' Facebook profiles, I don't find it a stretch to think that insurance companies would do the same thing. Here's hoping they quadruple the rates of everyone in that group.

  6. As has often be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the really effective way to make people drive more careful is to replace the airbag in all cars with a big pointy spike aimed at the driver's head.

  7. Why a law? by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure people are dumb. But how can anyone be so mind-boggling stupid that they would think that texting while driving is a good idea? I mean, why not just go to the next step and drive blindfolded? There shouldn't even need to be a law because no one should be dumb enough to do this. But I guess I have too much faith in humanity.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Why a law? by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ever been stuck in traffic for 30 minutes on a freeway, going 2 MPH?

      You can read a book, eat a burger and write out a 2 page email with absolutely no concern for the cars around you.... there's no where to go and nobody can go fast enough to even dent your car much less cause an accident.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  8. Great Idea... by deadmongrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am starting another group:
      "I am drunk While Driving and I Haven't Crashed Yet!"

    It sucks that we have to make laws to compensate for commonsense.

  9. Make Organ Donor Mandatory for These Idiots! by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to make organ donation compulsory for these people. At least they can be of some use after they crash.

    1. Re:Make Organ Donor Mandatory for These Idiots! by gnasher719 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would like to make organ donation compulsory for these people. At least they can be of some use after they crash.

      I like the idea of compulsory organ donation, but why wait until after they crash, when the organs might get damaged?

  10. Stop killing people by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've lost two people in pointless car crashes.

    Please use your goddamn head and pay attention to the goddamn road.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  11. This is what happens by pembo13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    when society looks down on physical violence. A solid punch to the chin and that guy may see the error of his ways.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  12. Darwin Award here we come by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We can all remember this thread when the asshat wins a Darwin Award. I've been near clipped many times by people fumbling with their phones. Usually they are gabbing, but more and more it's young kids texting. Youth tends to think it's invincible anyways.

    They even reference 'near accidents'. All it takes is for one other person around you to also have a lapse of attention to turn that 'near accident' into a real accident.

    If you need to say 'be there in 5' then pull over, or just make them wait 5 minutes. Duh.

  13. Re:It's not easier, it's harder! by Coopjust · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also, I recognize that you do have to continually think about your conversation during a voice call, but you at least have the ability to keep your eyes on the road...

  14. Re:Why such a specific law? by trolltalk.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not simply have a law where you must drive with "due care and attention".

    Too vague ... one person's "due care and attention" is anothers recklessness.

    Besides, banning texting for the driver while on a highway is a no-brainer ... because obviously people with no brains think they can do it "despite a few near-accidents."

    I finally bought a bluetooth earpiece when the laws changed, even though my cell already has speaker-phone capability, so it already was "hands-free"; after a couple of weeks, I now wish I had bought it sooner. (Hint - buy a good-quality one with noise and echo cancellation - you don't want to sound like you're talking in a garbage can).

  15. Re:Voice Recognition by jrothwell97 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In that case, how long would it be since I get a text reading

    Hello deer, I'm on the mane road and will be hone in to innits.

    And in that case, WTF is wrong with just making a phone call?

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  16. Here's A Challenge For The Statisticians... by DieByWire · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given that at some point the rate of new members signing up will equal the rate that existing members die, calculate the maximum number of members of 'I Text Message People While Driving and I Haven't Crashed Yet!'

    --
    Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
  17. Don't make me hurt you... by astralan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's thrilling to think of driving south on I-95 in the left lane and see someone driving five feet behind me staring at a phone than my bumper. Isn't that how road-rage gets started? It's more than an accident waiting to happen.

  18. Re:Why such a specific law? by deadmongrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with non-specific laws is that its open to interpretation. Also we can get rid of all specific laws and have one law: "do no evil".
    Your definition of evil may be different from mine.

    Also, most states have laws against careless operation of vehicles already.

  19. Get robbed by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just because you haven't crashed doesn't mean the extra few seconds it takes you to catch on to what's going on around you doesn't irritate the shit out of everyone else on the road an cause roadrage.

    Don't get mad when I smash out your car window with a tire iron and take your phone at a green light, if you were paying attention it wouldn't have happened.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  20. Stop Texting and Drive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I ride a Motorcycle, and I can truly say that I am sick and tired of almost being hit by idiots that are text messaging or chatting on their cell phones...
    I have seen people read books, news papers, work papers, shave, eat cereal out of a bowl, put on makeup, etc...and texting or talking on the cell both rank up there with "extremely stupid" behaviors while behind the wheel...
    The next person who nearly hits me ... well, I am building an EMP cannon, it should have an effective range of about 20 feet, and should be able to destroy small electronics, possibly an ECU...

    1. Re:Stop Texting and Drive... by kesuki · · Score: 3, Funny

      http://www.dhbolton.com/articles/diy-emp-generator.html

      the site suggests making the entire device DIY, but i think finding a nice titanium alloy tube that is extremely thin, and extremely strong, to propel a shotgun/handgun round pushing a magnet through EMP coils would be easier, and would launch a much stronger, larger EMP shockwave... the ignition chamber can be thick iron, just the tube needs to be extremely thin and long enough, to create the EMP wave. the coils are going to be a real expensive part, because tightly wound coils cost a lot to make. if you doubt me, just consider the development cost of magnetic containment fusion devices... they're in the millions, for conventional magnetic devices, and tens of millions for superconductive super magnetic coils.

      besides, i somehow doubt a nail would create enough electrical charge pushed through coils no matter how thin or however tightly wound to create a large enough EMP to kill a cell phone..

  21. Hey Taylor, out of the gene pool! by Max+von+H. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I nearly got killed a few years ago by a "distracted" driver who was happily chatting on his cell phone while running a traffic light. It took me over a year to recover and be able to work again and I'll feel the secondary effects of this accident for the rest of my life (definitely NOT a nice thing, trust me).

    In most European countries, using a cell phone while driving is considered impaired driving and you basically face the same consequences as if you were drunk in case of an accident, meaning your insurance will happily run away from you and you'll be declared responsible for the accident even if it's not initially your fault.

    I'm looking forward to the day it'll be the same here in Ontario as a lot of people don't seem to be able to distract themselves from their crackberries while driving. Maybe a $1000 ticket and a license suspension will teach them a lesson before they get to injure or kill someone.

    I for one hope this moron eliminates himself from the human gene pool without injuring or killing someone first.

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  22. Re:It's not easier, it's harder! by AmaranthineNight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know people who text without looking (Why would you need to check your output? It's close enough to what you meant) and if the text message in response isn't important, like in the case of texting "be home in 5", it requires lifting up your phone for a couple of seconds and hitting send. Calling could definitely be more distracting depending on how proficient you are at text messaging vs. carrying on a phone conversation.

  23. Re:It's not easier, it's harder! by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you still have to look at the screen to check your output multiple times, distracting you from the road.

    Like flipping through the radio stations? Here here! Let's call all radio station flippers names and ban radio station flipping!
    Honestly, the cell phone, or the texting, isn't the problem. There are times when it is perfectly safe to text (long empty roads on the way to the coast, for example). As someone above said, the rule should be that you "drive with due care and attention." Banning a particular technology because your view can't apply it in a safe way doesn't seem to be the right answer.

  24. How hard is it to read the fucking article by davmoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A number of comments here have asked questions like "how hard is it to pull over" or "why not just call them". Here's another one...

    Why not RTFA and discover that its a joke group and its creator is not trying to condone texting while driving.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  25. ook by pak9rabid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    between shit like this and the countless pictures I've seen of girls on facebook taking pictures of themselves while they're driving, remind me again why auto insurance is higher for males?

  26. Calvin by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny

    Text used to be a noun, now it's used both interchangeably as a verb and a noun. So many words in modern English are starting to be used like this.

    Verbing weirds language.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  27. Cognitive load by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 5, Informative

    the only thing that seems to get people keyed up is cell phone use. Can anyone explain to me why?

    Higher cognitive load.

    Carrying on a conversation is more mentally taxing than turning a radio dial, and isn't as interruptable, since you're only in control of half of it. See, for example, this research:

    "the Carnegie Mellon study, for the first time, used brain imaging to document that listening alone reduces by 37 percent the amount of brain activity associated with driving. This can cause drivers to weave out of their lane, based on the performance of subjects using a driving simulator."

    1. Re:Cognitive load by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem isn't the cell phone. It isn't the radio. It's the fact that the majority of driving does not require a lot of concentration. It has a low cognitive load. Thus drivers have a lot of free attention that needs to be channeled into something: listening to the radio, talking on the phone, etc. Otherwise they get bored and sleepy. That's why a lot of highways have rumble strips on along the side.

      The problem occurs when driving suddenly requires a lot more concentration/attention than we have to give it. If we can't shift mental gears fast enough to act to avoid a situation, we crash.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  28. Striking Back at Traffic Threats by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I drive a motorcycle in NYC, which is already really dangerous even when people are running only one machine, their car. It's even worse now that people are in their SUVs, sealed from the rest of the world and throwing their weight around in traffic - especially when they're not really NYC residents, but drive those trucks mostly in the suburbs where there's room for them to drive like fools. It's even worse than that with them talking to their phones pressed to their heads, distracted by what's in their hands rather than concentrating with their hands on the wheel. The worst are the SUV drivers with phones in their hands, and of course the very worst are the ones with both hands on a phone, looking at it while they text someone. It's totally insane, though they don't care since they feel like their giant truck will protect them in a collision.

    A month ago, one of these assholes cut me off downtown, almost driving me into a parked car (except I'm a very good driver, so I barely recovered to save my life). They raced to the next red light, which was only a block away anyway. I drove up next to their window and waved at them. I wanted to tell them to watch out, as most of them just aren't aware of motorcycles at all, which don't register in their vision like cars do. They were busy texting someone, as they'd clearly been while they cut me off, and they ignored me. So I knocked on their window. They ignored me. I knocked harder, angrily now. They glanced up at me, obviously having seen me the entire time, and waved one hand, mockingly making an "oh, I'm scared" face (even though I wasn't threatening them or anything). They laughed silently inside their big truck, and bent back down to resume texting.

    So I bashed off their side rearview mirror. I ripped it from the truck, and smashed at their truck over and over again while they watched in shock.

    Then I drove away and got lost among NYC's millions of other cars. Fixing that mirror's got to cost hundreds of dollars and days off the road. If only I could have smashed their window and grabbed their phone, I'd call to check in on how it's going. Maybe next time. If they haven't learned to just shut up and drive already.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Striking Back at Traffic Threats by ari_j · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many motorcyclists have the advice to always assume that you are invisible to other drivers. I make a slightly different assumption when I'm on my bike. I assume that every other driver is aware of my presence but actively trying to kill me. It's a lot easier to remain vigilant when you are being hunted rather than simply ignored.

      I'm glad you survived that asshole and, while I can't advise anything unlawful, if I were in charge of your insurance company I would gladly indemnify you for any claims that result from what you did, lower your rates to thank you for making the roads safer for other motorcyclists, and keep the other driver's insurance company embroiled in legal battles long enough to drive up his/her (you used "their" consistently) rates.

      One time, near Sturgis, SD, the week before the big rally, I was on my bike on a road with two lanes in each direction and no median strip, just a turn lane. I was behind about three or four Harley owners (I won't call them "riders" as a matter of principle) in the left lane. They were passing a minivan in the right lane, slowly and safely. The minivan suddenly, without using its signal (please, people, use your signal even when you think nobody is around to see it - chances are that you just aren't aware of the people who need to see it most), moved into the left lane. Two of the bikers were past it but one was next to it and, being less experienced, barely managed to wobble his way around and in front of the van.

      I decided to at least let the minivan driver know that the world was upset with him, so I sped up into the right lane (after checking that it was clear, of course, and with correct use of my directional signal), pulled up alongside the van, and looked inside the passenger window to see two men, aged in their mid-50's. I knocked on the window while maintaining my position next to the van until they were both looking at me, flipped them off until they both comprehended, and then sped up to get the hell away from their vehicle of mass destruction.

      Everyone, pay attention: Motorcyclists are highly vulnerable to the mistakes that you are too self-centered to care about making. Even a helmet and full leather body coverage can't save a life against being run into oncoming traffic, a guard rail, or the bottom side of your tires. They will be polite and courteous to you as long as you do the same for them. This includes crotch rocketeers, BMW road warriors, Goldwing tourists, and Harley biker dudes. There are exceptions, like the morons you see popping wheelies with their unhelmeted girlfriends on back or wearing flip flops, shorts, and nothing else as they cruise along the road (hint: your body doesn't care if your skin is one inch left of center or one hundred feet), but by and large a little bit of awareness on your part will make the world a better place.

  29. Motorcycles by Platinum+Fire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I drive a motorcycle and it was already bad enough with people not paying attention, and not seeing you in the mirror and about taking you out, and lately about 90% of the time when someone pulls into the lane and about hits me I notice they are on their phones usually texting. they need to just drive off a bridge already and rid the world of some more morons.

  30. Everybody gets distracted by Zen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, I agree that texting and using phones in general while driving is a bad idea. But it's not that bad in small doses. It seems that lots of Baby Boomers seem to think it's one of the most dangerous things ever. Let me help you understand - it's not.

    Multitasking is a learned behavior. Depending on how often you do it, unless you're incredibly dumb, you get better the more often you do it. Things like talking while jogging - you can't do it when you first start out because you can't control your breathing. It takes a while to learn how to do it. Same with multitasking while driving. Yes, it does distract you. But as long as your not inept, it shouldn't distract you any more then reading billboards and streetsigns that you pass, changing stations on a radio, talking to passengers, drumming on your steering wheel when your jam comes on the radio, etc.

    Yes, I text while driving. But on a blackberry, not a cell phone. Blackberry's are different - one button per letter. Since I've been using blackberry's for so long, I can pretty much type without looking at the screen, and I just have to glance at it every once in a while to make sure the last sentence was correct. I don't glance away any more then I do to look in the sideview mirrors or look at my center console to check my speed.

    I agree it's bad, but I disagree that it is always dangerous. I think there is a small percentage of people who happen to be bad at multitasking who try to talk/text and drive at the same time. Same as there's a small percentage of semi-truck drivers who are dangerous and cut small cars off at the last second, but we all watch out when we're around any truck because they have a bad reputation. Some people can compartmentalize and do multiple things at the same time, and some people can't handle it.

    I don't understand legislating the use of a phone while driving, because it's already covered under reckless driving laws. If you're sending a quick message, or having a few sentence conversation I don't see a problem with it at all. If you're having a heated argument, that's going to take a lot more attention away from you, and you should know better then to do that while driving.

    1. Re:Everybody gets distracted by Kabuthunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that it makes no difference if some people are good at texting while driving. Hell, it doesn't matter if 98% of people could do it flawlessly. In today's day and age, all you need is one jackoff to be retarded, and laws are created that affect everyone.

      These days, things are always put in place to appease the extreme minority, even if it pisses off the rest of the majority.

      Why do you think the warning "do not stop chainsaw with hands" exists?

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  31. Hands-free is no safer by Dire+Bonobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I finally bought a bluetooth earpiece when the laws changed

    "a 2006 study concluded that talking on a cell phone while driving is as dangerous as driving drunk, even if the phone is a hands-free model."

    The problem isn't the phone occupying your hands; the problem is the phone occupying your brain.

    one person's "due care and attention" is anothers recklessness.

    Apparently.

  32. Texting and driving should be illegal by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, really, folks. If you've constantly got that phone in your hand pushing buttons, how the hell are you supposed to hold on to your beer?

  33. Re:It's not easier, it's harder! by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You seem to be claiming that if you give everyone a wide berth, you could close your eyes for 10 full seconds at highway speeds without danger. Stupid.
    Without danger to others, yes. Without danger to themselves, no. I don't care what people do to themselves as long as they don't hurt other people.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  34. They should totally amalgamate groups! by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's another group on Facebook called 'I've had unprotected sex with 258 crack whores I've picked up at homeless shelters and I haven't caught any life threatening STD's yet'. I think that group and the text messaging while driving group should join forces. They could rename the groups 'we're a gaggle of stupid morons who're really pushing it'

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
  35. I want a morsecode key as a serious HID by DF5JT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously.

    For years I have had a shortwave transceiver in my car and since I don't like voice communication, I had a morse code key between the seats. I am quite proficient at the code, doing something like 40 WPM easily while driving on the Autobahn and I found that concentration was more difficult when I had an actual person to talk to in the car.

    I wish there was a mobile phone with twoe keys, one for dots, one for dashes to let me input text messages. Anything less than a full size keyboard is a PITA for text input; morse code would be a fine alternative, but i realize it's not for everyone. I look forward to a new generation of mobile phones that is open enough to make something like this possible.

    Please no hint at Darwin: I am an experienced driver and listening to music is just as distracting as watching parts of the landscape and in fact when doing morse code at 120 mpH I never need to take my eyes from the road. I would agree, however, that any input interface that requires a look at the input device is an invitation to cleanse the gene pool.

  36. Yet another redundant law by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is already illegal to drive impaired. Why do we need another law to say the same thing is illegal?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  37. How about Killed By a Textor?... with source by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is an accident where a driver who was texting killed someone because he was not paying attention to the road.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  38. IDIOTS! by stanjam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I ride a motorcycle. It is MY LIFE these idiots are playing with out there. It is bad enough I have almost been killed numerous times by people on their cell phones, but TEXTING??? I see anyone texting near me they are gonna get a fender kicked in!

    --
    Open Source: Eroding the Digital Divide