Slashdot Mirror


2008 Beijing Olympics as a Media Test-Bed

CNN is reporting that NBC is using the 2008 Olympics in Beijing as a test-bed to understand how people are using different media platforms. "NBC has scheduled 3,600 hours of Olympics programming on its main network, along with Telemundo, USA, Oxygen, MSNBC, CNBC and Bravo. That's the equivalent of eight days of programming packed into each day. In addition, the company is planning to make 2,200 hours of streaming video available on NBCOlympics.com. Consumers may also get video on demand via their computer and Olympics content through their mobile phones."

134 comments

  1. The Olymp-whats? by writerjosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with this test is: who's actually going to watch the Olympics?

    If they're using the Olymipcs as a test bed to see how people view media, then somebody in that department needs to be fired. You can't test a wide range of media on content that nobody's going to view in the first place (at least not enough to make it a real "test" of various media strengths).

    1. Re:The Olymp-whats? by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A surprising number of people do watch them. I don't know why- most of the sports on the list would draw record lows on ESPN8. But throw in the every 4 years thing and some flags, and all of a sudden a large number of people care.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:The Olymp-whats? by AkaKaryuu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who doesn't love ribbon dancing and curling?

    3. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Morris+Thorpe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nobody's watching? You better tell the 4 billion people who were planning to do just that...

      Beijing expects four billion TV viewers for '08 Games

    4. Re:The Olymp-whats? by mixmatch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe it has to do with the fact that it's an international competition for athletic dominance.

    5. Re:The Olymp-whats? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't stand watching them on TV, because they will show one heat of a swimming event, then cut over to the 5000meter run for a few laps, then go to curling, etc. I want to watch the freaking event. Maybe if they stream all of it, I'll actually watch the events I want to. (I don't necessarly just want to watch the media's favoritte American's compete.. Thats not the point of the olympics)

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    6. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who doesn't love ribbon dancing and curling?

      I'm a member of a Curling Club , you insensitive clod!

    7. Re:The Olymp-whats? by vertinox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nobody's watching? You better tell the 4 billion people who were planning to do just that...

      Historically, the Olympics have gotten low viewership in the West even when we host the Olympics. I think the Beijing estimates are a bit rosy even though they would now of course be higher due to domestic viewership in China.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    8. Re:The Olymp-whats? by rronda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, you are right. Who would like to watch the best athletes in the world, make their best effort, competing against each other as they strive to be the fastest, strongest human beings in history, as they strive to achieve perfection in their disciplines. Who would be that crazy? PS: I know this guy is being a troll, but nevertheless ...

    9. Re:The Olymp-whats? by sexconker · · Score: 2

      Chinese government to citizens: Watch the Olympics or be killed.

      ?

    10. Re:The Olymp-whats? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I am sick and tired of the Olympics.

      At least I don't watch TV anymore, so I can avoid some of the mind numbing crap coming out of this "cultural event".

    11. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. At slashdot, we all know that everyone will be watching computer Go.

    12. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      And how exactly does curling fit into that? I mean I could probably place in a competition involving eating nachos whilst programming, that doesn't make it a legitimate athletic event. Same goes for the luge in the Winter games.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    13. Re:The Olymp-whats? by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      In a bunch of sports that nobody cares about. Like I said- throw in some flags, and for some reason people watch.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    14. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "Olymics", stupid. Says so in the summary.

    15. Re:The Olymp-whats? by rronda · · Score: 1

      Well I don't know how to go about a set of criteria for telling whether something is a legitimate athletic event. After all, several athletic events are just throwing stuff into the air, and others involve shooting stuff, jumping on a pool, etc, so they can all be easily ridiculed. If people get really good at nacho-scripting, there is no a-priori reason why it should not make it as an athletic event.

    16. Re:The Olymp-whats? by spydabyte · · Score: 1

      Throw in some politics. They're better than flags.

      Have you ever been to a country that cares about their country and nationalism? Watch European football, live, then you'll understand.

      It's like a war... but without a death toll. Oh wait....

    17. Re:The Olymp-whats? by spydabyte · · Score: 1

      What channel have you watched on? Whenever I viewed them as a kid I remember entire sequences of events that showed most if not all the competitors performing. Sure they had commercial breaks, but they always showed the entire competitions, even if it wasn't live...

    18. Re:The Olymp-whats? by chaim79 · · Score: 1

      You gotta love Robbin Williams take on Luge:

      "What Drunken German Gynecologist came up with this sport? 'I am going to dress myself like a sperm, shove an ice-skate up my ass, and slide balls-first down an ice chute.', 'how will you steer?', 'I will clench my ass and do kegles all the way down'.

      "And don't even get me started on two-man luge, I'm going 'fellas, get a room'. 'hard right, hard right, make that turn you fucker, ohh yah'. 'You cost us 1-100s of a second with your thing going 'bbbrrrng' all over the place, dolphin boy'

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    19. Re:The Olymp-whats? by fremsley471 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This piece wonders how they count those 4 billion

      Lies, damned lies and TV viewing statistics: The most watched televised sports events of 2006

      Sport/Event/Claim/Verifiable

      Football, Italy v France World Cup final, 715.1m/260m

      American football, Super Bowl Steelers v Seahawks, 750m-1bn/98m

      Winter Olympics, Torino 2006 opening ceremony, 2bn/87m

      Football, Champs League Arsenal v Barça, 120m/86m

      Formula One, Brazilian Grand Prix, 354m/83m

      NASCAR, Daytona 500, n/a/20m

      Baseball, World Series game five, n/a/19m

      Golf, US Masters (final day), n/a/17m

      Tennis, Wimbledon men's singles final, n/a/17m

      Basketball, NBA finals game six, up to 1bn/17m

      Cycling, Tour de France (final stage), n/a/15m

      Golf, US Open (final day), n/a/10m

      Golf, Ryder Cup (final day), up to 1bn/6m

      Commonwealth Games, Melbourne opening ceremony, 1.5bn/5m

      Cricket, ICC Champions Trophy final, n/a/3m

    20. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      From the article:

      NBC has contracted with Quantcast Corp. to get a sense of who is using NBCOlympics.com.

      In that case, all the Linux and Mac users being blocked by Microsoft's dodgy deal with NBC should head over to http://www.nbcolympics.com/ and make sure they know the decision to block us was a bad one. Bonus points for leaving the site, and never returning, when you hit a lame 'platform not supported' message (I hit one in the Video section).

    21. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I'm always amazed that they manage to throw the ribbon so high in the air and catch it without slipping on the ice, all while frantically covering their footsteps with a broom.

    22. Re:The Olymp-whats? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Far far simpler. the government controls the media. just make it all olympics all the time and they won't have a choice but to watch.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    23. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      just make it all olympics all the time and they won't have a choice but to watch

      TVs don't have off switches in China?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    24. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      I went to a hockey game the other night, and a fight broke out.

    25. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Oops. I screwed up a perfectly good joke. It was supposed to be:
      I went to a fight the other night and a hockey game broke out. /hangs head in shame

    26. Re:The Olymp-whats? by QMalcolm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even more than that, it is a pure humanist celebration. Even though two countries hate each other, they compete together fairly under the same rules, and acknowledge when they lose. The entire world is also looking at one city for a while and if you follow the coverage you'll inevitably understand that place a little better.

      And that's just the sports, there is all sorts of cultural stuff that goes on. Saying the Olympics are all curling and ribbon dancing is like saying the world cup is just a bunch of people kicking around a ball.

    27. Re:The Olymp-whats? by bjmoneyxxx · · Score: 1

      You couldn't get away with having the tv shut off for more than a few minutes, unless you want guh-guh to get curious...

    28. Re:The Olymp-whats? by mixmatch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess it just depends on who you talk to. I'm pretty sure NASCAR is pretty low on the rank of international sports, but its #1 spectator sport in the USA... Lets not equate NASCAR to racing. That would be like saying that gymnastics is defined by baton twirling.

    29. Re:The Olymp-whats? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Informative

      To put it in a geek context, one word: Silverlight.

    30. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. There are plenty of people who want to watch events that aren't likely to be fully covered on television, such as preliminary rounds, full coverage of distance events, etc. The potential for full online coverage of some of these events has me giddy with excitement, assuming that it is covered that way.

    31. Re:The Olymp-whats? by smussman · · Score: 1

      Chinese government to citizens: Watch the Olympics or be killed.

      ?

      Profit!!!!

      fix'd

    32. Re:The Olymp-whats? by writerjosh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A troll? Wow

      Too bad people can't just respond without assuming they know about a person. And thanks for the Flamebait. At least I was brave enough to state my opinion.

    33. Re:The Olymp-whats? by rronda · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am sorry about calling you a troll. Rather I should have said that your post (rather than yourself) seemed like trolling. It didn't seem to me that "Who is going to watch the olympics?" was a rethoric question. You stated below that "content that nobody's going to view". If you were serious then you are very far removed from reality. You can look at some of the numbers for the Athens 2004 olympics here http://en.beijing2008.cn/16/8/article211928716.shtml

    34. Re:The Olymp-whats? by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking. The Simpsons had better not be cancelled for the olympics. I really don't have any time for that stuff.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    35. Re:The Olymp-whats? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I used to curl also (Lachine Curling Club) until those damn East European women started showing up.

    36. Re:The Olymp-whats? by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to a country that cares about their country and nationalism?

      You mean that there are countries that don't have crowds of apathetic people who dream of living in other countries?

      Can I care about my country without enjoying sports competitions? I'm sure it is a spectrum, some of us don't care about televised sporting competitions (or sporting competitions in general), though I am sure my bicycle is better because of sporting competitions, and maybe we are all better on a whole because of things like the Olympics.

    37. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Chees0rz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what I love about the olympics- even the long track events are fast (and interesting) enough that I can sit through them AND be entertained. I could never watch even a mile in highschool, or a 5k in d3 college track.
      The Olympics are when distance events aren't just excuses to give sprinters rest ;)

      NOTE: above is said with humor and respect.

      I can't watch that long ass swim event, though (like 25 laps?)... and am glad when they cut away, but that's only because I don't understand the sport. So I guess I see why they do it to track/swimming... It isn't fair to people who really enjoy the sport, but it may keep more of a diverse crowd watching.
      PS: GO MAINE CHICK IN THE STEEPLE!

    38. Re:The Olymp-whats? by benwaggoner · · Score: 1

      That's one of the coolest things that NBC is going to be doing.

      Since they're doing streaming, they're not limited to the physical channels they have available, so they can do many simultanous events in their entirety (and have the whole things available for on demand).

      And because they can do advertising around the video frame instead of having to cut to ads, they can keep the events going end-to-end without interruption.

    39. Re:The Olymp-whats? by chrish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Curling's a winter sport, dude. Come back in two years.

      When's women's beach volleyball on?

      --
      - chrish
    40. Re:The Olymp-whats? by writerjosh · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification.

      As for my original post, its been my experience that nobody I know ever watches the Olymics anymore. And it always seems that there are several jokes that go around confirming that nobody watches the "non-exciting" games anyway. So, its just an opinion from my personal experience...but maybe I'm just out of the loop ;)

    41. Re:The Olymp-whats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > Maybe it has to do with the fact that it's an international obfuscated-biochemistry competition for athletic dominance.

      Fixed that for you.

  2. will they actually cover the sports this time? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The other networks have to turn it into a fucking soap opera giving you a 20 minute tear-jerker biography of the damn athlete before each event. That cuts into time that could be better spent, I don't know, covering the actual Olympics? There are so many sports that don't even make it on television.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      There are so many sports that don't even make it on television.

      Tell me about it.

    2. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by hkgroove · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is what I hate. Just show the events and forget the Costas crap "human interest" commentary.

    3. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Unlikely, NBC is famous for the 20 minute biographicals and has exclusive rights to broadcast the Olympics in the US through the 2012 games. (So far...)

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    4. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've basically given up watching the broadcasts for exactly that reason. You only get 3 or 4 minutes of actual competition followed by a 15 minute sob story about some athlete having to deal with the deaths of her mother/father/sibling/uncle/pet goat after which they cut back to the studio where the talking head says where they'll be going to some time later but first these 10 minutes of commercials. And good luck getting any time for sports where the Americans are out of competition. Its simply not worth the frustrations anymore.

    5. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Slashdot's bid to get CmdrTaco vs. CowboyNeal Nude-nerd Mud Wrestling included as an olympic sport.

      First the Slashdot team, then it was to be expanded: Gates vs. Ballmer, Stallman vs. Eric S. Raymond, Torvalds vs. errr, Dean?

      The Olympics will never be complete without Nude-nerd Mud Wrestling.

    6. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agreed. I just want to see people compete at the highest level so I can see what something look likes when it's done "the best" it can be done.

      If I want to know someones life story I'll check wikipedia.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    7. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is what I hate. Just show the events and forget the Costas crap "human interest" commentary.

      There are essentially three ways to cover the Olympics:
      1. Nationalistic Penis Waving
      -My Country is better than yours; what a victory for [Country]

      2. Human interest pieces
      -[Athlete] worked so hard for this victory

      3. Technical analysis of the event
      -Look at his/her form in [event], the hip rotation generates power, etc etc etc

      Of those three, which do you think is the hardest and most expensive to get right?
      Hint: hiring knowledgeable & telegenic commentators for hundreds of events is not simple or cheap.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I just want to see people compete at the highest level so I can see what something look
      > likes when it's done "the best" it can be done.

      If it is indeed "the best".

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    9. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by Maxmin · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time to jump on some of those new "sports."

      --
      O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
    10. Re:will they actually cover the sports this time? by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Ugh, Bob Costas. If anything, he and Marv Albert should've called games with heavy springs in their jaws. Why? They are the ones who initiated the "talk continuously, even about things only tangentially related to the game, sometimes with a color commentator ex-professional sports guy, so that the audience doesn't figure out you can't really call sports games" school of sports broadcasting.

      Okay, to be fair, ESPN is more guilty of the color commentator proliferation.

      Some may remember that Costas said in 1988 that the Dodgers probably had the worst hitting line up in World Series history. Had he not said that, he wouldn't have had to eat his words after they won the series.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  3. BBC streamed last olympics online, didn't they? by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I recall a lot of folks were annoyed during the last olympics because the BBC blocked access to their online video streams to American IP address blocks because of NBC legal threats/licensing junk.

    1. Re:BBC streamed last olympics online, didn't they? by sunderland56 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And the reason people were going to the BBC for online content was.... NBC's coverage sucks.

      NBC insists on covering the Olympics "live", in prime time. Problem is - the Olympics are being held in a different time zone. So NBC tapes the events, blocks any "live" coverage that it can, and then presents the taped event in EST prime time as if was live. (That's why so many of the events on TV have *surprise* American winners - they just discard the tapes from events where the Americans lose badly).

      Hopefully, if NBC is streaming content, they'll stream really live content from all sports. If not... then broadcasters that do a decent job in other countries will see a large uptick in their traffic.

    2. Re:BBC streamed last olympics online, didn't they? by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think they did. They do with a lot of stuff these days. I think it's a pretty safe bet, it'll be on TV (with added 'red-button' coverage - extra TV streams so you can pick what you want to watch, either live or on a repeating basis. It ranged from 2 streams on Freeview to 5 on Sky during Glastonbury last month), on radio (5 Live probably), and through iPlayer, probably both as live streams and archived. Oh, and it'll more than likely be on BBC HD too. That is, until the sound breaks down, or the picture disappears.

  4. Re:Silverlight by mixmatch · · Score: 1

    I noticed this recently when they switched away from flash and it suddenly stopped working.

  5. it's just a reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    that whatever content you consume, it will be logged and analyzed. don't say they didn't tell ya.

  6. Quality of the video streaming by AmIyourJuliet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would love to see them actually stream decent quality video on their website. All networks want to boast their revolutionizing web access, when all they do is stream some ultra low res grainy crap. It's totally unwatchable when you are used to watching the exact same events in HD, for free. Why are content providers so scared to broadcast HD feeds via the web? They could leave the commercials in, and it would be the same as watching it on TV. It can't honestly be that they are worried about people distributing the content. I mean.... people can very easily capture the HD feed to their computer with a tv tuner. And when it comes to the "too much bandwidth" argument, couldn't they just use bittorrent? I know the reason probably has to do with money... but I'm not seeing it. Someone please enlighten me.

    1. Re:Quality of the video streaming by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      1. Can you even use BitTorrent for video streaming?
      2. We're talking about live video, too.
      3. ?
      4. Profits

    2. Re:Quality of the video streaming by QuantumRiff · · Score: 2, Informative

      An HD broadcast requires a big transmitter to be setup once, and then broadcast over the area. Big initial cost, then basically free (there are still some upgrades, power bill, etc) To show HD on the internet, your talking about Multiple Megabit connections for EACH viewer. The costs of that are astronomical. I guess, it would be similar to the differences between Multicast (transmit that 2GB file once to 100 machines), and unicast (transmit that 2GB file 100 times!).

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:Quality of the video streaming by rayzap · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plus it is in WMT wrapped in SilverLight poo! No Linux, they promised Mac but did not deliver. WMT is a great streaming format for live but not when wrapped in SL poo. WMT is fine for corporate work but consumer streaming is best with Flash so all can view. NBC is just a big lumbering media company who no longer "gets it".

    4. Re:Quality of the video streaming by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      Well I guess you can, Azureus Vuze does something like that. If the viewer is OK with a longer delay than for normal streaming then it can work.
      The server can just send to 1000 people and let them send to the others. The ones that receive the stream last could have a big delay (minutes, but hey, you have to compromise something).
      You'd also need a client that knows to prioritize the chunks at the beginning so that the movie flows without interruptions.

      --
      ics
    5. Re:Quality of the video streaming by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      couldn't they just use bittorrent?

      Not if the goal is video streaming. Bittorrent is all about maximising the use of the upload bandwidth of the peers to distribute chunks of the file. The chunks distributed are spread throughout the file ; once the seed has served a chunk, there is little point it serving it again because one or more peers can now seed it ; instead, it concentrates on uploading unseeded chunks until the full file is available from peers in the swarm. At this point, the seed is no longer required (as long as no peers go offline).

      What this does not achieve is real-time streaming at every peer. People like to watch sporting events while they are happening, for the sense of community. They can ignore an encoding/transmission delay of a few seconds, but waiting several hours (maybe listening to the cheers of the people next door) would not exactly be conducive to an exciting sport event.

      Hell, my wife insists on watching movies at their time of broadcast, because they are "better live"... even though they are coming through the HTPC and thus are exactly the same bitstream on disk whether you watch them now, later, or next year.....

    6. Re:Quality of the video streaming by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 1

      The US (Golf) Open did a great job with their online coverage. Full following of a couple marquee groups, coverage of a couple holes for all players that came by, simulcast of ESPN coverage, all of it in both SD and HD.

    7. Re:Quality of the video streaming by Bombula · · Score: 1
      Back in the stone age of internet video, about 15 years ago, streaming-only video was rationalized as a form of copy protection: if people could download videos, the quality would be higher (and compete with broadcast quality) and they would be able to fast-forward through commercials. The advent of Tivo and later DVR incarnations quickly rendered that logic bunk. But we're stupidly and annoyingly left with the outmoded architecture of that logic.

      Streaming video is simply retarded. It burns more bandwidth than simply letting people download clips because they end up stopping and starting, re-downloading packets into the buffer after connection losses or if you want to see the same footage more than once, and so on. And streaming video just doesn't work very well unless you have real broadband, which is actually quite rare in the United States. With most services, it's pixelated and you're lucky to get through a clip without it stopping or stuttering a few times. You certainly can't stream multiple videos at once, you can't enjoy a latency-free switching experience between clips, you can't watch full-screen video, and the lack of quality means genuinely live video doesn't hold up - basically, it has no redeeming qualities when compared either to downloading clips or to traditional broadcast. And in an era where any clip can be captured and piped right into youtube or a bit torrent, the copy protection angle is moot too.

      Google video's proprietary format (not available on every clip they host, I notice) is an example of hybrid-streaming, where you can start a clip anywhere in the timeline as if you were streaming, but any portion downloaded stays on your local machine and doesn't have to be downloaded again.

      Streaming video sucks in every conceivable way that video could possibly suck, and the sooner the idiots at the networks figure it out the better.

      --
      A-Bomb
    8. Re:Quality of the video streaming by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      HD feeds wouldn't work out so well, as most people don't have the bandwidth. Bittorrent wouldn't be good for NBC, because think about what happens when the masses start learning how to use bittorrent. You know someone will edit out the commercials and create new torrents that will quickly become more popular than NBC's torrents.

      However, it's not hopeless. I think they should create a proprietary, cross-platform P2P based Olympics viewer. A user could simply rank the events they were most interested in, and allow the program to download videos in the background. The program could then play these events back with a small number of ads included. The video ads should be brief, and supplemented by text ads on the user interface or below the video.

      Most people don't care much about seeing the events live, so long as they don't know the outcome. Most events won't be taking place at the time people want to watch anyway.

      There would be no need to encrypt the video. Let the determined few create torrents of the files, but the general public will accept a couple of ads in exchange for the convenience of using NBC's application, if it is well designed. Many people will also prefer the legal option, so long as NBC doesn't get greedy. Don't show 20 minutes of ads per hour like television, instead show 30 seconds every ten minutes. Otherwise you can't compete with bittorrent.

      The Olympics is a global event, so the cost of recording the events should be shared among the various countries. Each country can then simply place their own commentators and graphics over the video feed. This will keep costs in check. (If they're really clever, they'll share the cost of developing the viewer application too.)

      With globally shared video costs and P2P replacing broadcast costs, the expenses could be brought down so that the reduced number of ads still make a nice profit for NBC.

      It may never happen, but one can dream...

    9. Re:Quality of the video streaming by benwaggoner · · Score: 1

      Bittorrent isn't exactly designe for low-latency live broadcasting :).

      Have you watched any of the Olympics sample content yet? If you have enough bandwidth, I think it looks pretty darn good.

    10. Re:Quality of the video streaming by capnal · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Not only is low-latency a problem, but not crashing your seed when one million people try to start watching a feed all within a few seconds is probably a problem. Not to mention if you want HD, too!

    11. Re:Quality of the video streaming by Inda · · Score: 1

      You chaps in this part of the thread should look at technologies such as SopCast and the other 'pirate' video streaming applications. With a decent seed the action is more than watchable with minimal delay.

      I wish the FOSS community, with their huge knowledge, would start a project like this. Blow the big boys out the water and make them compete properly... ...oh, and the BBC uses P2P for some of their streaming. It can be done.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    12. Re:Quality of the video streaming by MilesAttacca · · Score: 1

      I love your idea. I'm looking forward to using that program to watch the 2028 Olympics.

      --
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smoke, and have sex. Put this in your sig if you like bagels.
  7. Time shifting options by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    My fiancee is a big fan of the olympics. We'll be out of the country for the first few weeks of August with no intentions of watching any TV. So she's looking into DVR options. I think every minute of coverage will be available somewhere on the internet after we get back. It'll certainly be easier than trying to pick everything to record beforehand. But she's afraid to take the chance that she'll miss something.

    So will NBC or others make all of the video available online immediately after the events? Will someone else? Is DVR the best option? Or will she have to spend hundreds of dollars on DVDs next year to see the olympics after-the-fact?

    1. Re:Time shifting options by vertinox · · Score: 1

      So will NBC or others make all of the video available online immediately after the events? Will someone else?

      Seeing the Olympic is an international event you might be able to foreign websites to view streaming video as long as you don't mind it being in your native language.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Time shifting options by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Seeing the Olympic is an international event you might be able to foreign websites to view streaming video as long as you don't mind it being in your native language.

      Ummm.. But assuming that all the people on Slashdot have English as their native language there are lots of other countries that speak English that may have it streaming, though some may have IP blocks for US IPs...

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Time shifting options by irondonkey · · Score: 1

      Seeing the Olympic is an international event you might be able to foreign websites to view streaming video as long as you don't mind it not being in your native language.

      There, fixed that for you.

      Also, consider that if you speak or are learning a second language, it might be a beneficial experience to watch in a foreign language.

  8. You mean OLYMPICS right...with a P? by codeonezero · · Score: 1

    Just making sure, we're all on the same page.

    --

    ....
    int main (void) { ... }

    1. Re:You mean OLYMPICS right...with a P? by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      No, they definitely meant mean Olymics. The idea of media covering the Olympics is just obvious and completely un-newsworthy. Slashdot would never do that. I haven't RTFA yet, so I don't know what Olymics is, but considering neither of us have heard of it it probably needs news coverage, right?

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    2. Re:You mean OLYMPICS right...with a P? by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      Well I think he was trying to make a joke but I do agree with you that I haven't heard of Olymics so his joke while it might be brilliant is way too obscure. Google doesn't really know either, he keeps hinting that I didn't search the right thing. Maybe he just didn't know how "Olympics" is spelled and wanted to make sure because the kids in school laughed at him, who knows.

      --
      ics
    3. Re:You mean OLYMPICS right...with a P? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      No, the olympics are a completely different thing, and most americans can't afford such luxurious name-brand products with the dollar in its current condition.

      Thus, china and wal-mart bring us, the OLYMICS!

      the 400 lb limited hurdles, the permanent vegitative state skydiving competition, the senior citizen milk run championship! tune in, and see it all on FSPN!

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  9. Re:Silverlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Flash is crap and Silverlight is far superior.

  10. What is this thing? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Funny

    They keep bragging about something called the Beijing Olympics in NBC. What the hell is Olympics?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  11. A Joke by rayzap · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am a track coach and the latest Olympic Trials streaming for track was a joke. They only webcast the same hours they broadcast. No in depth streaming, just re purposed broadcasting. Plus, if I have to watch stories instead of performances I am pissed. NBC is lost when it comes to Track and Field (as opposed to the NCAA where I happily sat at my desk and watched hours of great events. It's Ok to watch streaming as we are a streaming provider and I am the owner, haha.

    1. Re:A Joke by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      The coverage may be bad, but, hey, be thankful your favourite sport is in the Olympics. Some of us love sports that are ideal candidates, but don't make it in because of stupid IOC politics. :-(

  12. In other news: NBC declares war on our minds! by Cordath · · Score: 1

    "The whole idea is to get the same person and to touch them across all different sorts of platforms,"

    Spielberg's "Minority Report" might not be a classic, but it was very savvy in it's predictions about technology. In particular, the above quote brings to mind the excessively invasive advertising keyed to individuals via eye-scans. You can tell these NBC bastards have a hard-on for that kind of future.

    We're basically in a one-sided war. Advertisers are pulling together intelligence and getting organized for an all-out assault on our senses. They want control of our minds and they're willing to fight for it. What are we willing to do? Buy more ringtones?

  13. The Olympics are Vista and Silverlight only by symbolset · · Score: 1

    So it's more of a narrow test even than you might think. To participate you have to have more money than sense. The advertisers should love it.

    Until the servers go down, anyway. Microsoft might have some smart folks, but they're no YouTube.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:The Olympics are Vista and Silverlight only by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      While Silverlight is not Vista-only, you're right in another respect: we've had four different beta versions so far for Silverlight in the past four months. Somehow, I sense panic in a certain room in Redmond.

    2. Re:The Olympics are Vista and Silverlight only by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Read that again. I definitely did not say "Silverlight is Vista only.". That would be silly. Microsoft wants Silverlight to be widely adopted. That would never happen if people had to have Vista to use it.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:The Olympics are Vista and Silverlight only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, stop spreading your BS.

      First of all, it's 2 betas in over a year.

      Second of all, this is the standard MS release cycle. They do an alpha or CTP. Then they do one or two betas. Then they do one or two RC's, and finally RTM.

      Gosh, Firefox 3 went through what, 6 RC's in one month. YEAH! DESPERATION!!!!! I SPITE AT THEE MICROSOFT, FROM MY MOTHERS BASEMENT!

      idiot.

    4. Re:The Olympics are Vista and Silverlight only by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Interesting
      First of all, it's 2 betas in over a year.

      Since September 2007, we've had Silverlight 1.0, Silverlight 1.1, Silverlight 2 Beta 1, and two weeks back, Silverlight 2 Beta 2. None of the versions are backwards-compatible, in fact, between 1.0 and 1.1, the computing model had completely changed. code developed for one version isn't operable in others.

      Second of all, this is the standard MS release cycle. They do an alpha or CTP. Then they do one or two betas. Then they do one or two RC's, and finally RTM.

      The Olympics start on 8-8-08. Today's date is 8-7-08. We're at Ver 2 Beta 2 now. By your words, they need to do an alpha, at least one RC and then release NBCOlympics.com in production. All this in a month.

      Gosh, Firefox 3 went through what, 6 RC's in one month. YEAH! DESPERATION!!!!! I SPITE AT THEE MICROSOFT, FROM MY MOTHERS BASEMENT!

      I work with Silverlight on a daily basis; you can see some of the work my team did on the Silverlight showcase site (won't point to the exact entry). None of the work, though, was developed on Firefox, nor did we do any of it in my mom's basement.

      Trust me when I say this, MS has been _extremely_ aggressive in rolling out new features and versions in Silverlight. We think the only reason they're so aggressive is because of the Olympics; this is a hard production deadline they can't afford to miss. That is why we have versions every month. Hence my supposition of there being panic in Redmond.

    5. Re:The Olympics are Vista and Silverlight only by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Your title says the Olympics is Vista and Silverlight only. Unless you're saying that the Olympics uses other Vista-only technology that I haven't heard of, one would presume you were saying Silverlight was Vista-only.

    6. Re:The Olympics are Vista and Silverlight only by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The only thing silverfish brings to mind is mothballs, which is exactly what M$ will do with the development team when it fails to succeed with a package that no one wants or has any interst in, mothballed that is of course;). I wonder how many events M$ can pay off to be silverfish only and how the advertisers will feel when no one is watching their adds.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:The Olympics are Vista and Silverlight only by rts008 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The message I got trying to watch one of the videos:

      "Video is currently supported on the following browsers:

      - Internet Explorer 6, 7 for Windows (2003, XP SP2 or greater, and Vista)
      - Firefox 2 for Windows (2003, XP SP2 or greater, and Vista) and Mac OS 10.4.8+ (Intel only)
      - Safari 2, 3 for Mac OS 10.4.8+ (Intel only)

      - (coming soon) Firefox 3.x for Windows (2003, XP SP2 or greater, and Vista) and Mac OS 10.4.8+ (Intel only)"

      *Disclaimer* I knew it would not work, just curious on what would happen. I run Kubuntu 8.04 and ff3.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  14. Re:Silverlight by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just tried looking at a few videos on that site, and it requires Silverlight. Why can't they use flash like everything else?

    Microsoft Silverlight Gets a High Profile Win: 2008 Beijing Olympics.

    NBC got incentivized. After Microsoft failed to gain control of Yahoo to use it as a channel to force Silverlight dominance, the NBC agreement was the fallback.

  15. well duh by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    Well gee, with 2 events potentially being held at the same time or at 3:00 in the morning in a US time zone, obviously on demand is going to beat everything else because then people can watch it whenever they want. Plus, people without DVRs can't just pause and re-watch anything so they'll double up with on demand also. Here's another prediciton too: all the traffic is going to melt the freakin internet!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  16. On Demand too? by stevenbeb · · Score: 1

    But will it be available on demand? With a roughly 12 hour time difference between Beijing and the US a large number of events are going to be in the middle of the night. Without allowing on-demand even with this wide a coverage it's still going to be difficult to know when a particular event is going to be broadcast.

  17. if you get CBC... by wardk · · Score: 4, Informative

    they do an outstanding job covering the Olympics, if you can get it.

    while they of course emphasize Canadian athletes, they don't cater to them exclusively.

    and you get to actually watch complete events. not flip from event to event in a format apparently designed only for those with attention deficit.

    I bet CBC even gets some of the smog on screen. what a wonderful place to run long distances...

    1. Re:if you get CBC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. CBC does a pretty good job of showing the big ticket events, like track and field, or anything from the pool. Too bad they lost their Olympic bid after the next winter event in Vancouver 2010.

    2. Re:if you get CBC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the past, New Zealand coverage has been the same - relatively high quality commentary and focused on the event. I sure hope that the same people who have said "people want to watch adverts" wont look at the NBC coverage as something to emulate.

    3. Re:if you get CBC... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I bet CBC even gets some of the smog on screen. what a wonderful place to run long distances...

      I was just reading about China's plans to combat pollution.
      http://news.google.com/nwshp?q=china%20olympics%20factories

      Since taking hundreds of thousands of cars off the road hasn't done the trick, they are planning to shut down a whole bunch of industrial factories. It really says something when a country has to turn down its industrial output just to have breathable air.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  18. Stupidest test bed ever - Vista ONLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Last I heard a few weeks ago, the technology NBC will use is supported ONLY on Windows Vista.

    If that is still true, this "test-bed" will only be testing that tiny percentage of the market that swallowed the hook and upgraded/bought Vista.

  19. Back in the Atlanta olympics by OzPeter · · Score: 1
    There was a cartoon in the paper that read something like:

    "We have just had a report that other countries are competing in the olympics. Now back to our coverage"

    That has pretty well summed up every telecast I have seen in recent times, and what I fear will happen for Beijing no matter how many hours of coverage they stream/broadcast

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  20. Bravo? by ya+really · · Score: 2, Funny

    What exactly are they going to carry? Synchronized swimming?

  21. Not just Silverlight only by symbolset · · Score: 4, Informative

    The actual events will require both Silverlight and Vista.

    Thereby making absolutely certain that the videos won't be cached, transcoded and redistributed within seconds of their first webcast. You won't be able to archive them or time shift them or view them on the evil Lunix or your otherwise capable crackberry or eee pc. Right? Right? Because Vista's secure media transport and display has been perfected and will never be cracked.

    This streamed olympic footage will not be available for fair use, ever. Not even long after even those who participated have ceased to care. Me, I don't care already. If they stream it to an open platform I might watch some of it but Vista alone is too much of a price to pay, let alone Silverlight. I think instead I'll click over to CNN and see if they manage to smuggle out footage of protesters.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Not just Silverlight only by DraconPern · · Score: 1

      The actual events will require both Silverlight and Vista.

      Stop spreading the FUD, it may use Silverlight, but Vista is not a requirement. Silverlight 2.0 is even available for the Mac at http://silverlight.net/GetStarted/

    2. Re:Not just Silverlight only by symbolset · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, really?

      The Seattle PI reports: "However, there's a catch- this generous helping of everything from taekwondo to equestrian is exclusively available to Windows Vista users."

      Now read my post again. Is some part of it not in agreement with the facts?

      I think you're deliberately misunderstanding me in order to muddy the issue.

      The NBC "Olympics On The Go" service will only be broadcast to users of Windows Vista . You can have the Olympics in "up to HD" but only if you take Vista too. I can only presume they are afraid their servers couldn't handle the load of allowing it to the broad audience of popular operating systems and handheld devices, even though users of that equipment are a much bigger market for their advertisers.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Not just Silverlight only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of the how secure the streaming technology is, you can still easily record a high def video using a tv tuner card or a vcr.

    4. Re:Not just Silverlight only by markpeak · · Score: 1

      I can confirm watching archive video with Silverlight 2 Beta on Firefox 3/Mac.

  22. YEA!!! Eight hours a day with 20 minutes of action by SengirV · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't even watch the Olympics anymore thanks to NBC bastardizing it. It's like they swap out the NBC sports division with the staff from Lifetime.

    Guess what NBC, I WANT to see the fucking prelim races for ALL of the track and Field events. Not just 1/10th of the final race/event with 10 hours of stories about the F'n athletes that don't even win.

    DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! You've killed the Olympics NBC, and your network is in last place for a good reason. Isn't it time for Law and Order Peoria to make it's debut?!?!?!?

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

  23. At least the Chinese will be all set by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    They're sure to have full access to online coverage. Even if the Chinese teams were to lose to Taiwan or protests were staged during the event, I'm sure the government wouldn't be so petty as to use their Golden Shield to#`%${%&`+'${`%&NO CARRIER

  24. Beijing by clydewax · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new car dealer prices overlords.

  25. NBC Still Sucks by Cadre · · Score: 1

    Same story as two years ago. NBC Sucks. Microsoft has bought them and is using them to push their platform and is refusing to support anything other than Windows and Windows Media Player.

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
    1. Re:NBC Still Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Are you kidding me? NBC is owned by GE. No matter how big and powerful you think Microsoft is, GE IS BIGGER! They use and test what they want. True, they usually choose Microsoft, and that's sad. But to insist that NBC is Microsoft's puppet is wrong.

  26. Wheat and Chaff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they put synchronized swimming, rhythmic "gymnastics", the other non-sports, and all of their sickening "in depth" tear-jerk background pieces even Oprah wouldn't touch onto one of the obscure cable channels. If you are televising an athletic event, show us competition, not BS!

  27. That's a huge investment.. by searchr · · Score: 1

    Just to determine that most people will be watching "House" reruns on their iPod.

    1. Re:That's a huge investment.. by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does it look as though the Olympics are flush with cash. I think it is more of a case of, "we have a dumptruck full of money, how can we cash in on this internet" type of thing? There is going to be advertising, correct?

  28. What codec? by maciarc · · Score: 1

    NBC ... Telemundo, USA, Oxygen, MSNBC, CNBC and Bravo. That's the equivalent of eight days of programming packed into each day.

    Eight days of programming each day on seven channels? That's only 87.5% compression. They can get up to 80% with H.264. Then they could have 8.75 days of programming each day on the same 7 channels!

  29. Skewed Results by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    NBC wants to use this to discover how people view media. But if the streaming is restricted to Vista, they'll be forced to come to the conclusion that only a small minority of people use their PC's to watch television sports.

    All because the vast majority of people are still using Windows XP, not Vista. Somebody at NBC sure isn't thinking straight.

    I guess they figure that anyone who watches TV on a computer isn't interested in watching sports to begin with (what is known as a self-fulfilling prophesy in this case).

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
    1. Re:Skewed Results by ZigMonty · · Score: 1

      Or they *are* thinking straight and just want a certain result.

    2. Re:Skewed Results by jocknerd · · Score: 1

      This is probably Microsoft's doing. Some idiot at Microsoft probably thinks that people will upgrade to Vista in order to watch streamed video on their PC that was already shown on television. How do these idiots get in the positions of making decisions at these large corporations?

  30. WTF is Olymics? by GuyverDH · · Score: 1

    Now we can't even spell for posting of stories? Sheesh... Or are we afraid of some potential copyright issues over the term Olympics?

    --
    Who is general failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
  31. TripleCast by booch · · Score: 1

    This doesn't sound all that much different than the Triplecast idea that NBC tried with the 1992 Olympics. Spoiler: it went over like a lead balloon.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  32. Re:YEA!!! Eight hours a day with 20 minutes of act by baomike · · Score: 1

    I assume you are too far from the border to get a CBC station.
    These people can help, I think you have enough time.

    http://global-cm.net/
    http://forums.canadian-tv.com/index.php
    http://www.satelliteguys.us/canadian-satellite-services/

    There are also some french language programming. ie Canal Evasion with the Tour de France.

  33. Why your math is off by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 1

    You're listing single day events.

    Please think about why your comparison fails because of that.

    Thanks.

    1. Re:Why your math is off by fremsley471 · · Score: 1
      No, the comment was with regard to the exaggerated nature of claims for sporting events. Except for the blue riband events, how many people will watch minority sports for 16 days? The only big unknown in this is how many Chinese will feel that turning on a tv is their patriotic duty.

      If you go and look at the Olympics' own figures, they state that the numbers are those 'who have access' to see the Athens Olympics are 3.9 billion, and then watch 12 hours of coverage. Both figures are simply not credible but go unchallenged.

    2. Re:Why your math is off by D.McGuiggin · · Score: 1

      "No, the comment was with regard to the exaggerated nature of claims for sporting events."

      You're saying "no" when you didn't refute my point.

      ALL of your events are for a single day, which has fuck all to do with total viewership. You;re wrong.

      "Both figures are simply not credible but go unchallenged."

      Fine, but challenge them with relevant numbers, not list of single day events. The Olympics IS NOT a single day event, so total viewership is the number, and it has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE NUMBERS YOU LISTED. It doesn't matter that they didn't watch EVERY day, that's a stupid criteria that is irrelevant.

      You're wrong, and your examples are useless.

  34. Watchable on DVR by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to watch Olympics, but it's just so painful to find the event you want, wait for it to air, watch the boring "human story" of the american athletes who are expected to place 4th or 5th because it isn't US's best event, all to get to a few minutes of events. I tend to give up quickly

    Recently, I watched a swimming qualifier after recording it. After getting rid of the crap, an hour of coverge was 15 minutes of a great swimming meet! I even watched a couple of the post event interviews.

  35. Check your header by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "olymics?" You may want to check that

  36. Who is being tested? by vettemph · · Score: 1

    With the Olympic committee censoring the athletes and their families, dis-allowing blogging regarding the events, only allowing certain networks to cover the event, etc...

      The Olympics and China are a perfect match.

    Furthermore, NBC Universal(having exclusive rights) are teaming up Microsoft(a convicted monopoly) to bring you internet coverage using Silverlight(closed, proprietary, no Mac or Linux) technology for the coverage of events in (the censored country of) China.

      The sheep are their oyster.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.