Slashdot Mirror


GDocs vs. ThinkFree vs. Zoho vs. MS Office

CWmike writes "Web-based productivity suites, once almost a contradiction in terms, have become real challengers to desktop applications. Google Docs, ThinkFree, and Zoho, have all made major improvements in recent months. They're becoming both broader, with more applications, and deeper, with more features and functionality in existing apps. The question is: Are these three applications really ready to take on a desktop-based heavy hitter like Microsoft Office?"

226 comments

  1. eh by alexborges · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No!

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:eh by repvik · · Score: 1, Redundant

      my thoughts exactly

    2. Re:eh by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1, Funny

      nor can they stand up to the awesome might of wordpad. Seriously, I tell anyone over 40 to use wordpad lol.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    3. Re:eh by miknix · · Score: 0

      Yes! If not, an Open Office download is still worth a lot more than a $400 Office CD.

      OpenOffice++

      Also, Google Docs is always ready to use (no need to pay licenses and fill your windoz boxen with more crap) and supports collaborative editing.

      Just my 2cts.

    4. Re:eh by Vectronic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      LOL...

      Assuming that you (the AC) are WillyHill, you are becoming as disturbing of a thought as Twitter himself is.

      The links above are circumstantial evidence of the ownership of each account.

      WTF?

      Epic shill threads

      FTW?

      Due to trolling, this journal entry has comments disabled. If you would like to report a new account, just post on one of my open JEs

      TFW?!

      Are you building a civil case over this? Or are you going to start a Not-For-Profit Twitter Reduction Organization, Or are you just trying to invoke some sort of Slashdot method to delimitate user accounts, perhaps a mandatory subscription? Is there a newsgroup, or a website in the making?

      You can't stop "Twitters" by imposing more rules, you just make them more devious, and by creating such "following" of him/it/them you are solidifying his position as The Most Infamous Troll On Slashdot and most likely if not certainly making him more eager to continue, notice how he seems to be picking up the pace with new accounts? there's what like 8 or so vvillyhill/wiIIyHiII/wlliyhill accounts now... you are feeding the problem, unless of course, you actually are the problem, and a little more adept shilling method, pretend to combat your own trolling or something.

      How hard is it to mod him down, or to roll the wheel on your mouse past his comments?

    5. Re:eh by $random_var · · Score: 1

      Long answer: For certain tasks, especially anything that needs to be formatted or used with multiple Office products, no. For very simple tasks where collaboration takes precedent over formatting or power, YES.

      I LOVE love love Office 2007. But I use Google Docs for team docs that are constantly being worked on and referred to by multiple people.

    6. Re:eh by Z34107 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I, the President of the Twitter Reduction Organization, request that you cease the unnecessary and vulgar bandmouthing of our organization. We provide a valuable service, and as of July 100% of all proceeds go directly towards Twitter suppression activities.

      We accept Pay-Pal.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    7. Re:eh by KGIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is not exactly the same but years ago we all computed with terminals connected to a program that run over the network (well, not all, but a good portion of us did). This is the same thing, for the most part, as the computing in the cloud bit of today. I say that unless your organization is already capable of running thin clients and reliably using networked applications than you probably shouldn't base your businesses productivity and communications on cloud level software. With an installed application you are subjected to fewer potential problems in my opinion. Even if it is Microsoft's Office suite you're subjected to their EULA and the length of time that they maintain the product and file formats. With an online suite you're subjected to all of those plus connectivity, privacy policy changes, business plans that don't model your own meaning that they may go out of business, and more. The ends don't justify the means in this case.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:eh by rtb61 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Twitter has a long way to go to be the most infamous poster on slashdot. The worst and hence most infamous trolls on slashdot are the paid to post losers. If you pay attention to them you can even start to readily recognise the different sources. Generally the better ones are sitting in tech company offices posting whilst at work with a distinct bias to their place of work. Next up are a swag of US government propagandist, from better to worse, US government intelligence agencies (NSA>FBI and bottom of the barrel CIA), US government military (air force> navy>army and bottom of the barrel the marines) and of course the worst of the worst party political hacks (democrats>libertarians and bottom of the barrel republicans). However it is all a part of slashdot and not too bad as long as it is somewhat amusing.

      Back to topic, this was bound to be a pretty inflammatory topic and overall does not really make much sense as it is two comparisons at once, web served office applications versus local office applications and of course for the second part you really need to compare just off line office applications. Low cost hardware and storage getting cheaper every day along with free quality office suits really makes putting up with the hassles of web based office applications a pretty pointless exercise as you need to pay for additional hardware to connect to the net as well as of course paying for your internet connection. Big point in computer security, if you need absolutely need to connect work computers to the internet then do so, however in you can possibly avoid it then simplify your network security and just don't do it.

      Oh, and yeah and, you are a bad person and a crappy slash dotter if you mod a person down, rather than just particularly poor postings.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:eh by FredThompson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. Nothing which is remotely hosted, unless it's hosted on your own server, will ever be a serious office application.

      Proprietary information is only proprietary as long as access is controlled.

      Anyone who thinks a web-based office application is a good idea does not understand TANSTAAFL.

    10. Re:eh by xalorous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This article/discussion is not Open Office vs MS Office. It's about whether web based apps are ready for prime time. I know /. commenters are expected to go off the headline only, then spout their opinions without regard to validity, but come on. At least keep your fanboi comments related to discussions that pertain to Open Office. (BTW, I use it, I just don't think it's better than MS Office, only cheaper.) This isn't even open vs. closed discussioin. It's web 2.0 vs locally installed software. Webapps vs (PickOne: MS Office, WP Office, or OO)

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
    11. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Twitter has a long way to go to be the most infamous poster on slashdot. The worst and hence most infamous trolls on slashdot are the paid to post losers. If you pay attention to them you can even start to readily recognise the different sources. Generally the better ones are sitting in tech company offices posting whilst at work with a distinct bias to their place of work. Next up are a swag of US government propagandist, from better to worse, US government intelligence agencies (NSA>FBI and bottom of the barrel CIA), US government military (air force> navy>army and bottom of the barrel the marines) and of course the worst of the worst party political hacks (democrats>libertarians and bottom of the barrel republicans). However it is all a part of slashdot and not too bad as long as it is somewhat amusing.

      When will people realize that it doesn't matter what agendas a poster has as long as the points are good? Saying anything else is just ad hominem.

      If a poster says "Software X is bad because it misses this feature" and is correct, it doesn't matter if he is secretly paid by a competitor too. If anything, it helps us rest to evaluate things when two competitors actually pay people to tell us about the flaws in their competitors' products or why their products are better.

      And I'm posting AC because I work in a web marketing company and will now head to do some guerrilla marketing on another, very popular website. That shouldn't invalidate my earlier points.

      Oh, and yeah and, you are a bad person and a crappy slash dotter if you mod a person down, rather than just particularly poor postings.

      It seems that perhaps the parent did get it afterall. Now, to the rest of the posters...

    12. Re:eh by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Twitter has a long way to go to be the most infamous poster on slashdot. The worst and hence most infamous trolls on slashdot are the paid to post losers.

      How do you know they are paid by the Uncle Sam/Israel/RIAA/CIA/FBI/Microsoft etc?

      I often defend all of those organizations (and much worse ones) just for shits and giggles.

      No one pays me a cent.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No!

      Bollocks, zoho is the best. You can do anything at zohocom! Oh wait...

    14. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, he has his own cute list. Don't miss the "death threats" while you're there.

    15. Re:eh by penix1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only problem I have with web based apps, and one of its major stumbling blocks, is it is useless without an internet connection. Lose your connection, lose your productivity. No amount of portability can make up for that simple fact.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    16. Re:eh by andy9701 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google has tried to get around this with Google Gears. When installed, it lets you use Google Docs offline. Sadly, it doesn't support all browsers (I know that it works in Firefox, not sure about IE or Opera, pretty sure that it doesn't work in Safari).

      While not an ideal situation, it works. You do have a point, though, in that if you don't have an internet connection you are pretty screwed if you need to access your data that is only stored online.

      Hopefully as Wi-Fi becomes more ubiquitous this will be less of an issue, but not much else can be done about it really.

    17. Re:eh by bschorr · · Score: 1

      Exactly right - and why I won't rely upon web-based apps for mission-critical applications. And I'm extremely sensitive to where my data is stored - I want to keep control over sensitive work documents.

      --
      -B-
    18. Re:eh by IchNiSan · · Score: 1

      That is what google gears is for. for Google docs anyway.

    19. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Docs do offer offline capabilities using Google Gears.

    20. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem I have with web based apps, and one of its major stumbling blocks, is it is useless without an internet connection. Lose your connection, lose your productivity. No amount of portability can make up for that simple fact.

      Apparently you've never heard of Google Gears. It lets you use Gmail, Google Docs, and lots of other applications (including competing online office suites) while you're offline. When you get your internet connection back, everything resyncs.

    21. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with google gears you can edit and view your documents offline

      http://gears.google.com/

    22. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Safari already has native HTML 5 offline storage. This is basically what Google Gears was emulating. Now Firefox 3 has native support for this standard as well and Microsoft claims that IE8 will too. Opera is no slouch when it comes to standards, so I am sure they will implement it soon.

      That is the solution.

    23. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem I have with web based apps, and one of its major stumbling blocks, is it is useless without an internet connection. Lose your connection, lose your productivity. No amount of portability can make up for that simple fact.

      Gears is functional and present in Gdocs, and does address this issue.

    24. Re:eh by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

      You can use GoogleDocs without a web connection: http://googledocs.blogspot.com/2008/03/bringing-cloud-with-you.html

    25. Re:eh by xalorous · · Score: 1

      Locally installed, browser based software. Sounds like a hybrid. I think we should use whatever locally installed productivity suite we want to or what the company provides. The focus should be on open document formats and ways of sharing documents online.

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
  2. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you honestly think a business is going to allow its private correspondence to be handled over the Internet by one of these programs? Unless the company has nothing it would like to hide from its competitors, this isn't going to happen. There is too much fear of corporate spying.

    1. Re:No by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But how many businesses use e-mail? A bunch. How many use even plain-text e-mails? A good amount. How many use Windows and don't keep up with security patches? A ton. How many do you think have an outdated version of Apache running the webserver they have? One with a known flaw? How many even use unencrypted wireless networks? Or weak passwords? There are a lot more things the businesses have to and should worry about than a reputable company (Google) being hacked or broken into by a competitor.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:No by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Hell, the company I work for (financial) won't even let us install google search on the desktop, because I could enable the option to keep the search index on google servers.

    3. Re:No by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "There are a lot more things the businesses have to and should worry about than a reputable company (Google) being hacked or broken into by a competitor."

      Yeah yeah, but the real world doesn't run on 'should'. The reality is lots of executive types won't be thrilled with the idea sensitive data being hosted on a website.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:No by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      So once their suite is out of beta, and Google offers an G-Office Appliance which you can buy outright and install in your own server room, you'd have no objections?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:No by milgr · · Score: 1

      At my recent college reunion, I talked with a colleague who was setting up a new company. Initially she plans to use Google services and not buy Microsoft Office (or exchange). Google apps handle most of the Microsoft Office capabilities that the employees need.

      She is saving thousands of dollars in not paying for Office. She doesn't need anyone administering an exchange server.

      Admittedly, I didn't ask her about security concerns.

      --
      Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    6. Re:No by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      The huge issue is still connectivity. Internet may seem overly prevalent with wifi/3g/ethernet available all over corporate offices and big city settings but try getting work done somewhere rural where it is hard to get even a usable voice connection (forget 3g outside of a intermediate city and its nearby suburbs). Add to that the amount of work done on flights and you will see where google docs is just not right for reliable business use.

      An installed desktop version would be great but it is going to need to come a long way to compete with office. Even if *you* don't use some particular feature, as long as somebody in some department needs it to do their job, it makes more sense to standardize everyone on the tool that works (you'll be paying for the volume license anyways and maybe you will need to deal with someone elses document that uses an extra feature).

      --
      Bottles.
    7. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SaaS is picking up steam. There are tons of buisness willing to trust their data to reputable companies such as google and Salesforce. Salesforce has some big name customers and they've become very close to google, offering integration. I wouldn't write it off so quickly.

    8. Re:No by yppiz · · Score: 1

      Businesses come in many sizes. The majority of businesses are small - so small that they cannot afford an IT person.

      They aren't running their own mail servers, and if they are, chances are very good that they're doing it badly - no backups, no patches, unplanned downtime, etc.

      Most are instead currently using their ISP for services like email accounts.

      So the question they ask isn't 'why should I trust Google,' it's 'do I trust Google more than my low-cost DSL/Cable ISP?'

      And the answer is probably "yes."

    9. Re:No by chiger_bite · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. I'm not sure that the corporate environment is ready to take productivity to this level yet, for security reasons. The thought of confidential documents accidentally getting cached in the wrong place on a google server gives me shivers.

      I'm not that familiar with ThinkFree or Zoho, but if Google releases appliances that don't phone home except for software updates, I think they'll be a major competitor, provided they can keep the cost for the appliance under the cost of licensing for MS Office.

    10. Re:No by micheas · · Score: 1

      A sample implementation

      1. Look at googles terms of service.
      2. Realize that if you have any presence in the USA that presence is subject to the patriot act. (google is in the USA)
      3. Set your firewall to deny port 80 connections to google or put in a transparent proxy that makes all google.com requests via ssl.
      4. At that point you are probably as secure as the lame passwords your users chose.
      5. Issue real passwords to everyone.
      6. Run around and yell at everyone that has their password on a yellow post-it note on their monitor.
      7. Give up and supplement your income via corporate espionage selling accounts that have their passwords displayed on post-it notes.

      Though, doesn't every implementation look something like this?

    11. Re:No by micheas · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah, but the real world doesn't run on 'should'. The reality is lots of executive types won't be thrilled with the idea sensitive data being hosted on a website.

      Sunguards primary business is doing almost exactly that. (not with a web interface last time I dealt with them, but still)

    12. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many use even plain-text e-mails?

      Even worse, how many companies don't use plain-text e-mails, but HTML-"formatted" ones instead? Horrific ...

    13. Re:No by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      The huge issue is still connectivity

      Yes, that's what a "G-Office Appliance" addresses.

      It would be like these search serverssearch servers, but with an office suite.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    14. Re:No by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I don't think you understand what I mean by connectivity.

      For your suggestion to make any sense at all it would mean that when you are in middle of nowhere iowa with no 3G service, you just pull out your G-Office Appliance from your backpack, set your laptop on top of the nice big rackmount case, and start working. Still doesnt solve the no-connectivity issue in terms of all documents being stored remotely on the office suite server.

      Of course you could just have a local copy of the apps, but then why not just have a local copy of Office (or OO.o which is still way more featured than the web-based ones) that you can run no matter the status of the internet.

      --
      Bottles.
    15. Re:No by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      Why choose one or another? Keep you data for you and also exchange encrypted emails, have patches OS, etc

  3. No.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think that web apps will ever replace desktop apps for a while. First off, the issue of screen resolution. It is really easy to get OOo to work on my EEE PC even if it wasn't already installed, on the other hand, Google maps shrinks to a tiny little box. And even though decreasing the size in Firefox 3 makes it bigger, the font size becomes too tiny to even read. That's not to mention all the mobile devices that can have a ported version of OOo or Office to them with a customized interface to work well with each device while the web-based app doesn't cut it because it is too small. Will all these bugs be ironed out in the next 5-10 years, I would think so. But for now, no web app is ready to take on the desktop environment until it works well with various screen resolutions. (Google docs doesn't suffer from this problem, but Google maps does and I haven't tried either ThinkFree nor Zoho)

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:No.... by Inner_Child · · Score: 3, Informative

      I haven't used an EEE myself, but I imagine that hitting F11 would still put Firefox in fullscreen mode, and get rid of the toolbars, giving you a lot more room to work.

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    2. Re:No.... by cmacb · · Score: 1

      I don't think that web apps will ever replace desktop apps for a while.

      Well, which is it? Never, or not for a while? :)

      I'll go up the middle. There are clearly people using Google Docs right now (me for instance, but I am not in a situation that requires me to do either a lot of documents or spreadsheet work).

      I work with several small companies and whenever they send me either Excel or Word documents I load them into Docs (if I feel the need to save them at all) and so far I haven't run into any problems. Translation: Many small companies as well as individuals just stick to the basics when doing these things, and for the basics, Google Docs not only works, but provides its own advantages (doc sharing without a dedicated server, multi-user versioning, and less dependence on flaky home machines).

      So... I think the user base is going to be gradually dividing, with "casual" users from both home, home business and small business gravitating to "free" web-based tools, and everyone else continuing to do what they are doing now.

      What happens when (if) growth in Office licenses finally stalls? I think it will, I don't know when, but it will change the nature of being Microsoft in ways that are hard to imagine right now.

    3. Re:No.... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      I think one of the biggest reasons is Database access.. I know where I work, and many other places, Excell has become less of a calculation tool, and more of a reporting tool.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    4. Re:No.... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      can have a ported version of OOo or Office to them with a customized interface to work well with each device while the web-based app doesn't cut it because it is too small

      Will all these bugs be ironed out in the next 5-10 years

      Seriously? That long? They can make a version of OOo and Office for each new small device in less than a year, but making a customized version of web clients takes 5-10 years?

      This is a trivial problem. The thing that web clients are made to do is work well at different resolutions. All they really have to do is devote a week or two to the problem. They just aren't really intending it for what you're using it for yet.

      The bigger problem is that the standard GUI tools and events available to the desktop aren't available for the web. Web forms are basically a small subset of what you can easily do with desktop apps...which is why we have all these javascript libraries now. Once those deficiencies are gone from HTML, things will likely be extremely different. All of a sudden, web programming will be as versitle as desktop programming.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    5. Re:No.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, which is it? Never, or not for a while? :)

      Well, 10 years ago we couldn't imagine anything like YouTube, and the idea of streaming media was almost laughable back when most people had dial-up. The very idea of a browser on a cell phone would have been seen as impossible, and a phone that would be driven purely by a touch screen was the stuff of science fiction and would have cost $1000 easily. 10 years ago, Linux on the desktop seemed like something that was impossible. 10 years ago, a $200 desktop or a $300 laptop would have been looked at as if it was a scam. Yet today just about everyone visits YouTube, uses streaming media, and nearly every phone has a browser, and the iPhone has been a success and now only costs $200 (well more if you count in what expensive plan AT&T tries to put you on). Linux is pre-installed on many laptops and desktops today, and we have the $200 gPC and a $300 EEE PC. So, when I say, for a while, it means that today it sounds impossible, but 5-10 years from now, we might all be using it.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    6. Re:No.... by utnapistim · · Score: 1

      I modded you redundant by mistake; I meant 'insightful'.

      --
      Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    7. Re:No.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been 11 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment Chances are, you type faster than one word per minute

      HTH. HAND.

    8. Re:No.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. From a personal privacy perspective and from a commercial proprietary data perspective, I'd feel more comfortable with the data living on MyServer rather than someone else's server.

      To make universal network access a reality, though, OpenOffice would need to interact with something like a Web widget set (XUL?).

      An intelligent, standardized, client side, non-trivial, securable, web widget set is what is missing.

    9. Re:No.... by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Wot? Nah.

      Nine years ago my mobile phone had a WAP browser in it. It wasn't a full Web browser, true, but we all knew what the aim was... and speaking of phones with a touch screen, in 1999 I was working at a major telecommunications company on a phone which, though it had a full set of normal controls also, could be driven purely via the touch screen. So, not the stuff of science fiction. OTOH the product failed miserably for various reasons, but this is hardly the point. Equally, ten years ago I had Linux on my desktop, and there was nothing very unusual about that.

      True about the $200 desktop, though.

      The point I'm making I guess is that things realistically separate out into the stuff of SF and the stuff of 'too expensive, too bulky, too impractical, too slow'. Costs adjust as things change, electronics gets more compact, battery technology improves. But that doesn't mean that they were unimaginable or seemed impossible, although it may have seemed like that from the viewpoint of the general public. It just means that there were engineering problems that made the product prohibitively expensive or difficult. Your description just makes it sound a bit as though we are living today with kit that seems like magic because, 10 years ago, we would never have believed it could exist, and I just don't think that is the case. It's more of a progression than a series of breakthroughs - with rare exceptions, the breakthroughs happen in marketing. The rest is more or less incremental.

    10. Re:No.... by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      I don't think that web apps will ever replace desktop apps for a while.

      Boy, there's a commitment to your opinions. Yeah, I agree that they won't ever replace it for a while, if "a while" is defined as at least a week. Beyond that, I dunno. :)

      Google maps shrinks to a tiny little box.

      As opposed to? Desktop maps? Must have overlooked that app in my searching.

      (Google docs doesn't suffer from this problem [... ] I haven't tried either ThinkFree nor Zoho)

      So when it comes to actual web equivalents of desktop apps (the thing we're discussing), you think they're ready and/or don't know if they're ready, but when it comes to some other application which doesn't really have a desktop equivalent, you don't like the online version, so you don't think web equivalents of desktop apps are ready, even though you do?

      I don't think they're ready yet myself (though they're certainly useful in some special cases), but I have to say that I'm just totally confused by your post, even though I think I maybe agree with your conclusions. Do you think Google docs is ready or not?

  4. Missing Option by RuBLed · · Score: 0

    Emacs

    1. Re:Missing Option by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Emacs is never an option. SSH in from another machine and kill it from the command line.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Missing Option by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Other missing option:

      vi

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    3. Re:Missing Option by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Text editors for morons.
      sh with dd is enough for everyone.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    4. Re:Missing Option by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 2, Funny

      sudo rm -f `find / *emacs*`

      Nuke it from root. It's the only way to be sure.

    5. Re:Missing Option by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1
      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Missing Option by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Emacs is never an option. SSH in from another machine and kill it from the command line.

      Why use another machine? I'm sure EMACS has an SSH client built into it somewhere...

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Missing Option by ibmjones · · Score: 2, Funny

      Emacs is never an option. SSH in from another machine and kill it from the command line.

      And then nuke it from orbit - it's the only way to be sure.

  5. well by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I spent a decent amount of time today reproducing an OO.o spreadsheet in Google Docs - still a long way to go there before it is a threat. The gDocs spreadsheet does some cool things for a web app - and I was impressed with some of the features (for a web app - see how I have to keep qualifying?) but it still doesn't come close to the desktop app.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't you just import it?

    2. Re:well by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      Because I wanted to see what it would take, and if it would be possible. Last time I had tried I thought I couldn't even do it, since then I've learned some more about how the Google product works and wanted to check it out.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  6. Not alone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when they merge into SuperGoogleThinkZoho, they can slay the evil Microsoft Office!

    1. Re:Not alone... by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, they need OOo. Of all the competitors to Office, OOo is the most used one. I know a good amount of people who use OOo and most are even Windows users, yet I know of no one that uses Google Docs, ThinkFree, or Zoho. I'm sure there are some users, but no where near as many as OOo.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Not alone... by rubberglove · · Score: 1

      I'm keeping my eye on koffice.

  7. Are web apps the new cross-platform darling? by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From TFA:
    And because you work in a Web browser, they're cross-platform applications by default:

    At work we are going through some issues because Apple decided to deprecate Quicktime for Java and now we are scrambling to find a replacement that will work on Windows and Macs. However, honestly writing cross-platform apps that play movies and deal with databases and lots of networked files isn't trivial to make cross platform, but it might be pretty easy if we went to the web. Is this the future direction for "cross-platform" applications?

    1. Re:Are web apps the new cross-platform darling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that Quicktime for Java was deprecated back in 2003 why are you just now "scrambling" to find a replacement?

    2. Re:Are web apps the new cross-platform darling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Apple only deprecated part of the QTJ API, as part of a clean-up when moving towards QT6?

    3. Re:Are web apps the new cross-platform darling? by chasd · · Score: 1

      Adobe Integrated Runtime. Windows and OS X versions available now, Linux version available soon, beta available now. Since it has a Flash runtime built-in, it is capable of playing On2 VP6 and MP4 / H264 video.

      --
      :wq
  8. Are we serious here ? by Cochonou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last time I had to use the Google Docs suite (3 months ago), it was to access a shared spreadsheet: each people had to fill in what food or drink they were bringing in at a party, in order to have some kind of co-ordination. The "shared document" concept is really nice, however the AJAX controls were killing the performance of my laptop from 2004. So I have trouble imagining doing work with such a solution - at least with my configuration.
    Of course, it would be probably better with a newer computer, but I feel sad that an application which is recognised as being a hog such as MS Office runs better on my computer than Google Docs. (I took a glance at TFA, and it seems to imply that Google Docs is the fastest solution of all 3).

    1. Re:Are we serious here ? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      The performance of any web based application will depend on A) Your browser and B) your connection speed. If you are using IE 5, it is going to be really slow. If you are using Firefox 3, it should be at least reasonable in speed. If you are on dial-up it will be slower then the guy on a 8 MB connection. All web based apps suffer from this, and is one of the reasons that they aren't used as much.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Are we serious here ? by batkiwi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm posting this right now on an hp pavilion ze4430us bought in early 2003. It was $990 at the time from Circuit City (close to bottom of the line) with 512mb ram and a "mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2400+" (so says cat /proc/cpuinfo).

      We run a google spreadsheet with 5 tabs and a few hundred rows in each tab (and some longrunning calculations on the front page) and it never has any performance issues with google docs, even with 3 of us editing at the same time. This is in firefox3 on ubuntu hoary something 8.04.

      So an almost bottom of the line usable PC nowadays (i just use it for web and chat) has no problems with it...

    3. Re:Are we serious here ? by lastchance_000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the performance of any RIA will depend on your browser's javascript implementation. That's why I use Webkit as much as possible.

    4. Re:Are we serious here ? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      The ability to collaborate in a very natural fashion is a strength of GDocs (and I assume the other web-based suites) that is going to be very hard for MS Office, OOo, or any other PC based office suite to match.

      OTOH, the local desktop office suite is likely to stay around for a long time. It has strengths with regard to customization of the user interface, macros, templates, boilerplate insertions, and tie-ins to local databases or datastreams that will not be easily duplicated by the online tools.

      Performance remains a problem for the online suites. However improving client-side hardware is not going to help that much, for most users. What will help, and has already shown some big improvements, is better implementations of Javascript and DOM management in the browsers: FF v3.0 is noticeably faster with some GDocs than earlier versions. This is likely to improve even more in the next 12 months when Javascript 2.0 debuts. And, of course, fatter pipes will help a lot. Probably the degree to which the average joe uses his online office tools vs his local office tools will be determined by the limitations in online performance. My guess is that a lot of people will have both open concurrently, and do a fair bit of copy/pasting back and forth.

      As far as security goes, that's a non-issue. Most companies are content with letting a bank hold their money; they will be just as content with letting one of Google's Fort Knox storage facilities guard their data.

      So the online suites and local suites are likely to co-exist since they have complementary strengths. A major factor in determining which specific products emerge as leaders is going to be the ease with which content can be moved between online and local suites. At the moment, that means the products that best implement the ODF standards are going to emerge as the industry leaders.

    5. Re:Are we serious here ? by R_Dorothy · · Score: 1

      Something that has been suggested before is enabling Open Office to act as a client for Google Docs to combine the best of both. This would give you the full featured desktop client but with the online storage and collaboration of the web. You would also be able to use the web interface if you didn't have (or want to use) the desktop suite - such as in an internet cafe, a locked down work desktop or other system without OO.

      --
      Stupid flounders!
    6. Re:Are we serious here ? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      The ability to collaborate in a very natural fashion is a strength of GDocs (and I assume the other web-based suites) that is going to be very hard for MS Office, OOo, or any other PC based office suite to match.

      Why? What magical power do you think web browsers have to transfer your data quickly and accurately from one place to another that other applications cannot implement? Do you think shifting all that data via a third party is going to give you more bandwidth just because that third party is "teh Google" or something?!

      People have been using things like IRC and instant messaging on the Internet for decades, and they are a heck of a lot more efficient at transferring data in real time than anything based on HTTP and browsers.

      I'm afraid the rest of your post is similarly wishful thinking. Performance is always going to be a problem because, for a start, Internet connections are not free (and bandwidth is only fixed-cost up to certain limits with today's price plans, which in turn have a rather limited life expectancy in a world of streaming video and on-line apps like these). Security is a non-issue? It will be after the first big leak, and even the mighty Google has had a few major problems in the security/identification area lately (captchas cracked, inadvertently leaking all GMail users' names...).

      Ultimately, there is nothing you can do with an on-line office suite run by an external service provider that you couldn't also do with a client application with an Internet connection and your own server to host any shared data. Being centralised, the on-line applications have the advantage of ease of administration, which no locally installed software will ever completely match, though whether that really matters with one-click deployment and updating tools available is a different question. On the other hand, no on-line solution can ever offer the same degree of control, security and reliability that a local set-up can, no matter how hard you try.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:Are we serious here ? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll feed the troll a bit. Others might enjoy watching.

      Why? What magical power do you think web browsers have to transfer your data quickly and accurately from one place to another that other applications cannot implement?

      I don't expect that of the browser at all. I expect the browser to do exactly and only what it is intended to do: function as a client.

      Meanwhile, the server-side software of GDocs (for one example) will assure that all collaborators are working with the same version of each tool in the toolkit. When a bug fix or new feature is added, all collaborators benefit immediately. Further, the hardware or OS any collaborator is using has no impact on the form or substance of the document. Everyone sees the product of their joint work the same way. Asssuming that they are using a standards compliant browser.

      The server-side software also handles versioning issues, assuring that all collaborators are seeing the same revision, and that all have equal access to the history of the document.

      There are additional security benefits in using a star topology for collaborative work. The server that sits in the middle of every process can be hardened against various forms of attack with relative ease (compared to hardening all collaborators' individual systems). And in collaborative work, the amount of bandwidth used in updating a document is much smaller for a star topology than for a point to point (which not only reduces exposure to security threats, but improves efficiency of operations and lowers connectivity costs).

      Finally, the number of collaborators that a server-side system can handle can increase easily up to the limit of the server's connection bandwidth and is independent of connection limitations of any of the clients. In a point to point, the effective speed of the group is typically reduced by the limitations of the members with the narrowest pipes. This becomes a serious issue when some of the collaborators are using dial-ups in remote locations.

      People have been using things like IRC and instant messaging on the Internet for decades, and they are a heck of a lot more efficient at transferring data in real time than anything based on HTTP and browsers.

      Uh, yeah, sure. I collaborate on spreadsheets and video scripts using IRC all the time. It's a natural outgrowth of the way we all used to use Post-Its and a community bulletin board to contribute to the group spreadsheet and tweak the dialog of the tv commercials.

      I'm afraid parent post is devoid of much thinking, even wishful thinking. For wishful thinking usually starts from a basis in reality. Parent post exhibits an amazing freedom from the constraints of the reality box wrt understanding these here intarweb tubes.

      Ultimately, there is nothing you can do with an on-line office suite run by an external service provider that you couldn't also do with a client application with an Internet connection and your own server to host any shared data.

      This is true, but it is a tautology devoid of any real meaning. Ultimately, somebody could build up a server and set up mechanisms for keeping all his collaborators current on the latest client-side upgrades of the software, handle the versioning issues, etc, etc. Taken to the extreme, that somebody would end up with a privately owned functional duplicate of what GDocs et al. provide. Basically on this point parent post comes down to the "make or buy" question of Cost Accounting 101, and asserts without proof or evidence that rolling your own is always the best solution. I'm not buying that "argument" since it is an empty one: there is no content here.

      Can a corporation do a roll your own replacement of the functions that online office software is moving toward? Of course it can, if it wants to take on the tremendous costs involved in development and maintenance of the beast. Unless it designed this with excess capacity it could sell to othe

  9. File format!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I havent read TFA, but the biggest hurdle by far which will hinder the adoption of any office suite, web-based or otherwise, would be compatibility with MSoffice file formats.
    Oo.o has way more features than any of the web-based suites, but even that cannot beat simply because it isnt sufficiently interoperable with MSoffice.
    I'm desperately hoping that things would change in the near future, with ooxml stirring up storms.

    1. Re:File format!!! by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      because it isnt sufficiently interoperable with MSoffice.

      Wait a second... Lets see, I can save an item in OOo and I can open it up in Office and still get all the text just fine. I can use a saved file from Office and open it up in OOo and still get all the text just fine. However, I can take a saved file from Office 2003 and open it up in Office XP which should be compatible, but wait... The file from Office 2003 looks totally different on Office XP! But aha! I have Office 2003 installed on my laptop... But wait! It looks different on there then on the Office 2003 at work!

      Face it. Even Office isn't good at being sufficiently interoperable with Office. But that hasn't killed Office... Yet.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:File format!!! by DougReed · · Score: 1

      That is not an accident. That is by design .. Microsoft wants to sell everyone the new version... By making it break every year, yours eventually gets so lame you upgrade it because it can't open anything anymore.

      Standard Mafia style tactic, for a normal criminal organization... But that's OK, because Bill Gates gives to the poor.

    3. Re:File format!!! by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1

      Common anti-microsoft fud. MS released a compatibility pack for older versions of office when Office 2007 was released.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    4. Re:File format!!! by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      So did Pablo Escobar...

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
  10. performance seems to have improved; who'll use it? by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The last time I tried the google docs spreadsheet (maybe 6 months ago?), it was ridiculously slow. I was about to post here and point that out, but then I thought I ought to check how the performance was today, in case it had improved. Well, I don't have any real data, but my subjective impression is that they must have made vast improvements in its performance since the last time I tried it. It really seems fine now.

    The question in my mind now is how many people are really going to want this.

    • A lot of users aren't going to use it, for the same reason they're still running IE5 -- they've always "had Microsoft," and they're not the kind of people who are interested in tinkering with software.
    • Serious users aren't going to use it, because it doesn't have the right features.
    • I'm not going to use it, because I'm getting along fine with gnumeric and ooo, and I see web apps as a free-as-in-beer solution that would be a step backward from free-as-in-speech.

    I teach physics at a community college, and I have a bunch of linux boxes in the lab alongside the windows machines. The linux boxes only have Ooo, and the Windows boxes have both Ooo and Excel. It's been interesting seeing how students react to being presented with a choice between Excel and Ooo. I actually have documentation in the lab manual for Ooo, and none for Excel. Nevertheless, the vast majority don't want to mess with Ooo. Even if they have never used a spreadsheet before in their life, Excel is a brand name they've heard, so that's what they gravitate toward.

  11. Office is da bomb. by inTheLoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just give up already, you want to spend the money and buy a nice new Vista PC. Piano black, the ribbon, veterans love it and newbies grok it. It all works together so well it's like a dream. Opens your old documents and saves the new ones in a better than internationally accepted standards way. Worth every penny, $450 for the ultimate OS and $450 for the bestes Office suite, so your computer should not cost much less than $1000. Think of how it will train your children in the skills every office demands. Yeah, now your wallet is moving.

    --
    No calls now, I'm ...
    1. Re:Office is da bomb. by aussie_a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I spoke with several people before buying Windows XP a couple of months ago. They all recommended XP over Vista.

    2. Re:Office is da bomb. by right+handed · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You missed a blinking sarcasm tag. "da bomb", "Yeah, now your wallet is moving"? That can't be serious. Then they pointed to a journal article ...

      I can't recommend any of it. Having to pay $900 for a Windows/Office upgrade is bad. Spending $150 on top of $900 so you get to install and patch two versions of Windows verges on madness. What's best is to use free software. The interface change is only shocking for a month or two but you can get comfortable with anything, then you start to notice real productivity helpers like session management. The same thing can be said about Open Office and Google Docs. They do what you need, sometimes more and they are free.

      --
      M$, because life is too short to type icrosoft frequently.
    3. Re:Office is da bomb. by KGIII · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Could this be yet another twitter clone? It sure looks like one... Clones are Usually aNnoying Twitter...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Office is da bomb. by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Think you got the prices wrong.
      Office Ultimate here in Australia is $1,200.

      A drop in the pond compared to the $8,000 computer you need to run it. :)

    5. Re:Office is da bomb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They misguided you. MacOS was the answer: Office works and so does anything else.

    6. Re:Office is da bomb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stay classy, twitter.

    7. Re:Office is da bomb. by CrazedSanity · · Score: 0

      $450 for Vista Ultimate
      $450 for Microsoft Office
      $400 for new PC

      Realizing you paid more for software on your computer than for the computer itself: PRICELESS.

      --
      Sanity is like a condom: rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.
    8. Re:Office is da bomb. by dedazo · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure looks like it. He hasn't posted enough to make a definite call.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    9. Re:Office is da bomb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't get any better than seeing you modded down for giving the perception that you're trolling yourself. and all for a few funny mods that don't even move your karma one bit.

      good job willy.

    10. Re:Office is da bomb. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Considering I need to buy an entire computer for MacOS, I wasn't prepared to do that. Once MacOS removes the DRM, I'll give it a try.

  12. easier way to quit emacs by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you knew more about emacs you would know that you don't need to ssh to quit the program. From within the program just type Control-Z ... then after the Stopped message type "killall -9 emacs"....

    1. Re:easier way to quit emacs by Trogre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... and then remember that you had another emacs session open in another terminal.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:easier way to quit emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use the butterfly shortcut in EMACS to manually transmit via cosmic rays commands to the CPU. That's the most simple way.

      http://xkcd.com/378/

    3. Re:easier way to quit emacs by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Funny

      type "killall -9 emacs"

      No. "shutdown -r now" from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    4. Re:easier way to quit emacs by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      then after the Stopped message type "killall -9 emacs"....

      And then you remember you were running Solaris (damn !)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    5. Re:easier way to quit emacs by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      wouldn't you want -h if you really wanted to be sure?

    6. Re:easier way to quit emacs by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      How did that strategy work out the last time someone tried it? ;-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:easier way to quit emacs by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      I was considering that, but I decided that since a nuke doesn't stop the area from existing, its more like a clean-slate reboot. Of course, if you put emacs in /etc/{init,rc}.d, you deserve what you get.

    8. Re:easier way to quit emacs by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      kill -9 -1 is a classy alternative...

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
  13. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by nawcom · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm guessing these are entry level physics classes? 111 or 101 perhaps? I don't mean anything bad at all, because the last time i had a physics class no one was using MS Office stuff at all. Pretty much everyone writes stuff up with LaTex.

    Just for humor's sake, you should teach a lesson one day about how Microsoft software makes your intelligence fall. I'm sure it's pretty easy to come up with a reasonable formula for it's rate of change. Even better, play the Balmer videos. Everyone loves those. :-P

  14. You should try flex by Rix · · Score: 1

    If you don't need it to be Java.

    1. Re:You should try flex by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      My thinking exactly. Sort of. That might be a step up coming from quicktime for java, but still doesn't sit well with me. I haven't had a ton of experience with either Qt for Java, flex, or any other alternative. But, this being slashdot I'll make an ignorant complaint/ suggestion anyway. The right way to do that is Smil. Its an xml based multimedia presentation language, thats poorly supported by very few companies (real doing the least worst job). Why, why, why didn't anyone at all make it work well? It would have been awesome. Even with all resources on the same computer, the real implementation sucks. Being real, it trys to buffer the multimedia sources before beginning. Anyway, I haven't looked at Silverlight, but it sounds like the same idea, but infected with microsoftish style. I've seen enough crappy microsoft xml to know better than to trust them to design anything using it.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:You should try flex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might want to use QuickTime to support codecs other than those supported in Flash, in which case Flex won't cut it.

  15. My objection exactly by Nursie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Same objection I always had with GMail.

    Google is then in charge of your data.

    I don't care if google is staffed exclusively by Ophanim (closest rank of angels to god), I'm not willing to trust a third party with my stuff, and neither should any self respecting company.

    1. Re:My objection exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you trust 3rd party software?

    2. Re:My objection exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if google is staffed exclusively by Ophanim (closest rank of angels to god), I'm not willing to trust a third party with my stuff, and neither should any self respecting company.

      Blasphemy! And they are, see their motto! And there are 50 reasons why you're wrong: http://www.preachingtoday.com/illustrations/topicalreference.html?keyword=Trust!!

    3. Re:My objection exactly by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I can use it offline and store my files locally.

      I'm not relying on a third party to transport and store my confidential data.

      These are different levels of trust.

    4. Re:My objection exactly by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not willing to trust a third party with my stuff, and neither should any self respecting company.

      Like Microsoft ?
      MS Word could be FTP-ing your docs to Redmond every night for all you know.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    5. Re:My objection exactly by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I'd see the traffic. As would other people. That wouldn't stay secret very long.

    6. Re:My objection exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can use it offline and store my files locally.

      Your machine is disconnected from the internet when running 3rd party software?

      I'm not relying on a third party to transport and store my confidential data.

      You are relying on 3rd party software to not transport and store any confidential data.

      These are different levels of trust.

      More like different levels of expectation. You should trust them the same: When using a service or software you didn't compile yourself after inspecting the code (in a compiler you wrote yourself in assembly, etc...), you still have to trust the authors and designers. IOW, if you don't trust a web company such as (Google, Amazon, etc) why would you trust company that patches and compiles your software (Microsoft, Red Hat, Ubuntu, etc)?

    7. Re:My objection exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an independent provider of internet services and one of the things I offer is email hosting.

      So I operate an email server for about 50+ companies and there staff. Also for some friends and in some cases their wives.

      I work alone and if I read any or all of the emails going through my server there would be absolutely nobody looking over my shoulder or reviewing access logs.

      But come on, reading any of their messages would be worse then being forced to watch an entire episode of Survivor. How the hell would want to do that?

      With that said what if you could pay an extra $50/year for SSL and encrypted storage? Would you upgrade?

  16. Re:Oh no, it's twitter again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Please mod parent up

  17. Re:HEY TRUT! by miknix · · Score: 1

    Google? It's garbage.
    Linux? It's shit.

    Best stick with MS. Always works.

    Someone is throwing chairs out there...

  18. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of my teachers in school required us to submit assignments in LaTex. There was quite nearly a full scale rebellion. I was pissed off enough that she required us to use a program of her choice to generate a PDF that I simply didn't bother to learn. I just OO.o, same as always, and exported to PDF. The marker didn't know the difference.

  19. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

    I should also note that this was a computer science class, not physics. We really just needed to answer questions about Databases, and nothing more complicated that a text based word processor would offer. (Sorry if that's completely inaccurate. As I said, I didn't bother to learn, as it rubbed me the wrong way, and I don't use any word processor enough to learn a new markup language just to submit an assignment.)

  20. Litmus test by narcberry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The simple litmus test: Would you submit a resume using those tools?

    --
    Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    1. Re:Litmus test by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Considering people who receive resumes are often HR luddites, it's a test - but not of how good the tool is. More a test of adoption.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    2. Re:Litmus test by gbobeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wrote my resume in Google Docs. Overall, it did a pretty good job, and made it a lot easier to not only track revisions, but also to share it with a few chosen people who were givnig me some assitance in writing it.

      After it was finished, I found it trivial to save it as a .doc and do last minute formatting in Open Office. Most of the formatting issues were really caused by minor font differences created by the constant changes and revisions. I have since re-uploaded the final version to google docs.

      So to answer your question, yes.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    3. Re:Litmus test by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      At this point, I wouldn't submit a resume in anything other then .doc format. Hell, I wouldn't even submit it in .docx format... They are still making progress.

    4. Re:Litmus test by againjj · · Score: 1

      I hear from Google people that it gives you extra points if you do for a Google application.

    5. Re:Litmus test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's how I plan to submit my next resume... GDocs spreadsheet saved as a pdf.

    6. Re:Litmus test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simple litmus test:
      Would you submit a resume using those tools?

      Done!
      --I wrote my resume with Gdocs.
      --I attached my Grandcentral number to various links sprinkled throughout the document. i.e. worked with ELISA, Western blotting techniques, and centrifuges. For more details on machine versions and assay kits click here and call me right now! OR I am proficient with Microsoft Office, Excel, Access, and many other basic to intermediate office computer tools. If you are unsure whether the version I know is compatible to the one in your office click here to call me right now and ask, this resume will still stay open while we chat.
      --I included a link to a form in my resume which was made with Gdocs. The link was in a section on all the scientific conferences/symposiums/discussants I went to throughout my career. There were radio button in the survey next to the major events. When they choose their conferences it was submitted and added to page one, then matched to page two where the values were returned and displayed for them via a link in the thank you for using this survey. They were shown what conferences matched mine and given a link to Grandcentral me once again and talk about any of the conference research.
      --I used the live data graphing function (the same as the one that is used for google finance. And I used the motion mapping graphing function for all sorts of projects I worked on. I also had a gantt chart for small "goals" I was looking to complete in and out of work.
      --Every time I added the grandcentral option to my resume when I sent it off I got calls about picky details which were on the mind of the HR people while they were reading it. It worked wonders.
      --I made a special Google calendar which allowed and showed the HR people and interviewer what days I would be free for an interview and let them make an appointment right then and there. Of course with a Grandcentral link to confirm the appointment.
      (I also included many non-google items. Like DropBox for all sorts of things that they may want to look at. Research data, financial lab management, current and past studies, etc. No downloads just easy access to more info right away.)

      I WAS TOLD THAT I GOT HIRED SOLELY B/C EVERYONE GOING ALL THE WAY UP THE CHAIN WAS IMPRESSED AND SOME IN AWE DUE TO MY EASE OF COMMUNICATION.

      I still get told this by random people who were showed my resume which had a face pic next to my name a good while later.

  21. Re:File format! (Equation editor) by lahvak · · Score: 1

    For me the major incompatibility is the equation editor. Most of the time I produce all my documents and presentations using TeX, but every once a while I need to work on a project where the documents need to be in MS Word format (that's usually when I do a job for the education department). That's a bit of problem for me, as I run Linux on both my home and office computer. Openoffice is fine for opening an occasional email that somebody clueless sent in a Word format although it really contains nothing but text, but when the document must have bunch of formulas and equations, Openoffice will not do it. I can create equations in Openoffice, and it will even open a Word document with equation objects in it and display them just fine, but an equation object I create in Openoffice will not display correctly in Word. I don't blame Openoffice for this, the problem is that Microsoft and DesignScience created a format that is even more cryptic and less portable than .doc, but the problem is there, and it makes it impossible for me to use Openoffice for these documents.

    Do any of the web based wordprocessors have a decent equation editor?

    --
    AccountKiller
  22. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by chelsel · · Score: 1

    You might just be using a different browser with a better JavaScript interpreter... both Safari and Firefox have made great strides with JavaScript performance.

  23. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    You might just be using a different browser with a better JavaScript interpreter... both Safari and Firefox have made great strides with JavaScript performance.

    That could be. I think I was using ff 2 last time I tried it. I'm using ff 3 now.

  24. Yes by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So many companies (particularly smaller ones) don't really know much about computer security, backups etc and what Google provides is probably better than what most mom&pops can do themselves.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  25. No indeed by Shandalar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bad article, bad greenlight. Office is way beyond any of the web based 'productivity' apps.

    1. Re:No indeed by andy9701 · · Score: 1

      While that is true from strictly a feature perspective...does that really matter if the majority of users don't use any of the features of Office that the online-based word processors don't have?

  26. Doesn't sound like it by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just visited the home page of each of the three alternatives mentioned, and read their own words about what features their word processors offer. It was hard not to laugh: they actually describe things like being able to save your files and collaborate with others as features. I'm not sure any of them even mentioned a single real word processing feature anywhere on their list. And while some of the on-line features they plug have some merit — though I suspect many of them are really only gimmicks of little real world value — of course being on-line comes with some major downsides in the security and reliability areas.

    Then I read TFA. (Yes, really. It's quiet night. ;-)) I think this quote is the most telling:

    All three of these word processors are capable of tasks such as formatting the typefaces, placing and sizing graphics, arranging paragraphs, and setting up tables. But only ThinkFree offers the really sophisticated features, such as letting you format a hanging indent.

    (Emphasis added)

    If adding a hanging indent is sophisticated, these things aren't even glorified text editors, never mind word processors. Where's my real-time word count and spelling checking? My document structuring and organisation tools? My cross-references, footnotes and bibliographies? If they're going to pimp my pages, can I at least have a smart H&J algorithm and use my professional grade OpenType fonts? There is more to a word processor than basic text editing and the occasional picture or table!

    I think it's safe to say the guys in Redmond don't need to start throwing chairs. The on-line apps aren't even Word from nearly two decades ago, yet.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Doesn't sound like it by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it was a document I really cared about, I wouldn't use Word either. It has horrible typography.

      For stuff that I really want to look beautiful, I use Latex, and for very technical documents that need to be really precise, DocBook/XML.

      Rich.

    2. Re:Doesn't sound like it by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I never said Word's typography was good. :-)

      But if they want to beat it and are going to try and do so on the basis of better-looking documents, it would be nice if they at least did a couple of the obvious things Word doesn't.

      And yes, for some types of document LaTeX does a much better job; personally, I use XeLaTeX more these days, so I can use those OpenType fonts. But LaTeX is not without its fundamental flaws: it has an unhealthy obsession with messing up vertical spacing, and its control of floats is limited, to give two obvious ones that will hit most people writing a long document sooner or later.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:Doesn't sound like it by dookiesan · · Score: 1

      The letters always look nice, but I struggle getting them to appear where I want them to with (you've got to be a master to get an embedded image not to appear in the worst possible place).

    4. Re:Doesn't sound like it by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      Where's my real-time word count and spelling checking?

      From Google Docs

      flibbertigibbet is the correct spelling and the count info is below.

      Counts
      Words: 3
      Characters (no spaces): 23
      Characters (with spaces): 25
      Paragraphs: 1
      Sentences: 1
      Pages (approximate): 2

      Readability
      Average sentences per paragraph: 1.00
      Average words per sentence: 3.00
      Average characters per word: 7.67
      Average words per page: 1.50
      Flesch Reading Ease: [?] 6.39
      Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: [?] 13.00
      Automated Readability Index: [?] 16.00
      Done

    5. Re:Doesn't sound like it by tyrione · · Score: 1

      I never said Word's typography was good. :-)

      But if they want to beat it and are going to try and do so on the basis of better-looking documents, it would be nice if they at least did a couple of the obvious things Word doesn't.

      And yes, for some types of document LaTeX does a much better job; personally, I use XeLaTeX more these days, so I can use those OpenType fonts. But LaTeX is not without its fundamental flaws: it has an unhealthy obsession with messing up vertical spacing, and its control of floats is limited, to give two obvious ones that will hit most people writing a long document sooner or later.

      XeTeX and with the upcoming SoC projects it's get even easier to use TeX with native Unicode Support.

      http://code.google.com/soc/2008/tex/about.html

  27. Internet Access by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    Many companies don't even like given internet access to all their employees (which I agree with) so a web-based office solution is less than optimal.

    I'm still holding out for a sleeker version of OpenOffice with an improved UI and improved load times.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  28. Ob Single-Page Print View Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Ob Single-Page Print View Link by ockegheim · · Score: 1

      Does this open 14 pop-up windows?

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
  29. For basic use, probably. by zmjjmz · · Score: 1

    The convenience of online docs (at least in a school setting where Gmail is blocked, fucking Websense) far outweighs the functionality of desktop docs, especially because I and most people I know won't be using half of that functionality.

    1. Re:For basic use, probably. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I tried it my job (I also emailed the file to myself just in case)

      The funny thing is, I can access gmail just fine at work, but google docs is blocked as a personal storage sever.

      Sorry to tell you, but Websense will most likely follow you to your next job as well.

  30. Office + SharePoint better for large businesses by bentronic · · Score: 1

    I can see a lot of smaller businesses going towards Google Docs, OpenOffice.org and the like. Google Docs has the collaboration stuff built in, but Microsoft has SharePoint, which is a collaboration server/solution kinda thing. It's pretty slick, integrates with Office and Communicator/Messenger and stuff. But it requires a lot more infrastructure and is way overpowered for most small- to medium-sized businesses.

    1. Re:Office + SharePoint better for large businesses by Shados · · Score: 0

      Office has Groove for smaller businesses... I've never tried it though, I like Sharepoint too much, especially since I'm a .NET dev and it integrates really well with Team Foundation server.

    2. Re:Office + SharePoint better for large businesses by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 2, Funny

      the parent company of the company where i work recently invested in a sharepoint installation. i haven't yet used it, but i saw an attempt to demonstrate it. that was quite embarrassing.

    3. Re:Office + SharePoint better for large businesses by bentronic · · Score: 1

      TFS for version control strikes me as a watered-down ClearCase. At least Microsoft finally gave VSS the boot.

    4. Re:Office + SharePoint better for large businesses by Tungbo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we don't have all the bells and whistle enabled, but we do have sharepoints in the company IT environment. It seems very much like a clunky version control system with a web interface and ACL. The functionality that I've seen can be duplicated easily on a webserver, so I don't understand the attraction given all the overhead....

    5. Re:Office + SharePoint better for large businesses by Shados · · Score: 1

      Thats pretty much what it is. TFS is like the many Source Control + Team Management systems out there. It does have much less features than things like ClearCase, but it has more sensible default settings for the teams most likely to use it, and it is more accessible $$$ wise for smaller teams. Its mostly aimed for teams that have outgrown stand alone source control, but aren't ready for things like ClearCase: and that happens to be a -lot- of teams. It does the job, and its easy enough that I was able to set it up without knowing much about stuff like that. Its definately not the best, but it works for its targeted audience :)

  31. The thing is.... by greenguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    None of them are all that great. Do Google Apps do everything Office does? No, clearly not. But frankly, I think Office is overrated. Granted, my copy is a couple of years old, but I just don't have much use for it. I open most things in OpenOffice, but even then, I'm converting a lot of it to text. I find all office suites ponderous and bloated, more by feature creep than any particular flaw in coding. Send me text, and I'll put it in Scribus or LaTeX.

    Google Docs should be thought of as a highly-collaborative text editing environment, not a word processor. It looks exceptionally good when you look at it that way.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    1. Re:The thing is.... by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      None of them are all that great. Do Google Apps do everything Office does? No, clearly not. But frankly, I think Office is overrated.

      The point of Microsoft Office isn't that it's the greatest Office suite ever, it's that in a Microsoft setting, it's easy to integrate with a lot of other things so that everything ends up as Word documents or Excel sheets (or starts that way and ends up being something else).

      As a standalone suite, pretty much anything will do the job unless you're always locked into Microsoft land (especially with huge Excel macros).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:The thing is.... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      None of them are all that great. Do Google Apps do everything Office does? No, clearly not. But frankly, I think Office is overrated. Granted, my copy is a couple of years old, but I just don't have much use for it. I open most things in OpenOffice, but even then, I'm converting a lot of it to text. I find all office suites ponderous and bloated, more by feature creep than any particular flaw in coding. Send me text, and I'll put it in Scribus or LaTeX.

      Ok; and since everybody in the universe is identical to you, that must be Microsoft will be going bankrupt any minute now. Any minute... now. Any minute... ... now! Hm.

  32. I use Zoho for sharing docs by rochlin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I use Zoho Writer everyday to share frequently updated docs among co-workers. It's buggy, terrible for printing, and not completely dependable. But it's damn convenient for that kind of sharing. Especially if updates are only needed a couple times a day. When I started using it a year ago, it was better than Google's alternative, though I think Google has now passed it.

    Still, if I'm going to type anything for printing I'll use Word. If I'm going to do anything that doesn't need to be continuously shared, I'll use one of the office apps. If I need a spreadsheet of any complexity, I'll use Office.

    I'd much rather see Google & Zoho polish the features they do have (Zoho still can't print in Landscape format, has nothing close to WYSIWYG printing, and frequently locks. Google has no locking to prevent users from overwriting each other (last time I tried it...). Don't bloat till you've got the skeleton working.

  33. Zoho is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Zoho for everything now, office-wise. The developers are great about responding to issues, the apps are at least as usable as MS/Open Office for anything I need, I can access my docs from anywhere, I can work offline with Google Gears and Zoho Writer, and I can save the files to any number of formats if I really need to. I really don't see any need to install an office suite anymore.

  34. Not much need for MS office here... by tylersaurus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Microsoft Word: Not as useful as Latex, and too much of a pig for writing quick ideas. If I want to jot down ideas or write a short story or something informal, I will take TextEdit or Google Docs any day! There is no reason it should take 10 minutes for my word processor to load up. If I need to make a legitimate paper for a journal or symposium Latex is hands down the most superior.

    Excel: In general I have no use for spreadsheets. Occasionally I will take jobs where I will fill out time-sheets, and in general Excel works best with these since OO sometimes has some problems properly running the macros.

    Powerpoint: According to Edward Tufte this is totally useless anyways. I wish I could say that Latex's beamer is the superior choice... and for some people it might be. But I have never relied too much in a talk (I prefer to use handouts) and a lightweight WYSIWYG editor is nice to have. So Google wins on this one.

    All the other things in office like Groove: meh...

    I think the general public could easily phase out Microsoft Office, but it is pretty unlikely to happen.

  35. Welcome to the 21st Century, Print is Dead. by right+handed · · Score: 0

    they actually describe things like being able to save your files and collaborate with others as features. I'm not sure any of them even mentioned a single real word processing feature anywhere on their list.

    Writing only has value when people read it, aka sharing. Collaborative writing is the primary purpose of physical offices. Google and other online tools are providing the most valuable features any office and word processor could.

    If you want things to look good on paper, use LaTex. If that sounds archaic, it's because it is.

    --
    M$, because life is too short to type icrosoft frequently.
    1. Re:Welcome to the 21st Century, Print is Dead. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      My point wasn't that collaboration was bad. On the contrary, good collaboration tools are very useful in modern offices, as you point out yourself. But I can already save files, and share documents with others by saving them to a common disk. Doing it using someone else's disk across the web doesn't get me anything I couldn't do already. None of the three alternatives made any comments about review and version tracking features, nor about being designed to make their documents look good on-screen, either.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:Welcome to the 21st Century, Print is Dead. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      I can already save files, and share documents with others by saving them to a common disk.

      You are not the centre of the world.

      These online suites are in their infancy, and already they're as or more useful than the old-school suites for many purposes. They'll only get better.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:Welcome to the 21st Century, Print is Dead. by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      at the firm where i work all the programmers where recently asked to help write a tender for a software contract. because we're a small firm, the boss is used to writing these himself. the result was that we had to use word. within short time it became clear that we had to implement a mutex for access to the document. for example, the boss told us not to open the document, then he'd write some stuff, then he'd email us all his newest copy (email was in his mind necessary because we have offices at three different locations). as well as this, the document was being edited in three different versions of microsoft office and also openoffice.org. you can imagine how much fun that was...

      doubtless there are more classical methods of collaboration, but googledocs would have helped my boss here.

    4. Re:Welcome to the 21st Century, Print is Dead. by tero · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure if you knew this or not, but Word actually has had "Track Changes" feature for quite a while - I agree it's not the greatest of implementations, but it does the job - especially in smaller office situations like you describe above.
      Also, if you have your document on a shared drive and someone else is editing it, you have the option of letting Word notify you when the document is available again.

      That might help your boss next time.

    5. Re:Welcome to the 21st Century, Print is Dead. by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      as we were working from different locations on different platforms and my boss is terrified of vpns, a shared drive is not possible. change tracking would also not have helped. we were working on different parts of the document. my idea was to use a wiki and have one page per chapter.

  36. Web apps serve different audience by beachdog · · Score: 1

    I propose, web apps are a toolset for doing a better blog.

    Web apps are pieces to use in establishing an Internet communication situation.

    I have a blog, I plan to put a spreadsheet in it, make the spreadsheet do calculations based on visitor inputs. maybe draw colored circles on a map based on visitor clicks on a map.

    Maybe do a narrated slideshow presentation online, again this is where apps can help.

    I see that I am beginning to build structures that need another layer to enable description and auditing.

    The interesting thing about ZoHo is it looks like they are beginning to assemble the components for building a complete business "system" as a bunch of online components. Way beyond just a blog or just a communication solution made by an individual or small team.

    I am using Google Apps Hacks by Philipp Lenssen as an idea book for my communication project. As titled it is mostly about the Google family of applications. The methods for linking are not restricted to google only.

    It looks to me that Google will accept links to documents created using ZoHo, EditGrid, Thinkdfree and PbWiki.

    ----------

    Separately, yes Google spreadsheet did strange things to my data when I deleted columns. For primary data crunching I find Gnumeric has better input data handling. Then I copy the presentation level spreadsheet up to Google docs.

  37. interoperability more important than many realize by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work at a non-profit. While we use Office internally, some of the groups are shifting to Google Docs for community outreach. Why? Because there's no software to buy, information can be shared between remote and local users, updated instantly.

    I've tried using Word's version tracking features and they tend to fall down. Google Docs will allow simultaneous editing but it's auto-save feature needs work. It saves every 30 seconds so you can end up with a thousand edits that don't really mean anything. Two features that need to be added: the first feature is a data edit session. If Joe reviews the document, he can open a session, make his changes, and close the session. So when I want to see what Joe did, all I have to do is hit a filter that says "Highlight Joe's last session." Or maybe I could say "highlight all of Joe's changes." The other feature that would be great is versioning. After I finish my first draft, I promote the document to second draft and continue editing. Then I can track changes between draft 1 and draft 2, 3, etc, Joe's contributions between draft 1, 2, etc.

    At this point in time, Excel is the only Microsoft application I actually like. Google has a way to go to equal that. But for data aggregation, Google Spreadsheets work just fine. Anyone can open the sheets, enter data, and I can copy and paste into Excel for anything more. Nobody has to own Excel or download anything, they can enter the data from any desktop in the world. Word gets grudging credit as the only good option for funky printing requirements. I haven't tried out OO for this yet, it may be up to snuff now.

    Where Word really chaps my ass is that there's been no improvements in what's broken since I first started using it. Styles is borked, formatting is borked, there's little flexibility in layouts, tables are buggy, trying to size ANYTHING becomes an exercise in frustration because you cannot position by pixel but by arbitrary jumps, etc, etc. None of these problem areas are addressed, we're just buying the same old broken code with new turd polish each and every version.

    Microsoft is still the king for now but there are dozens of companies and open source projects in the race to smoke their asses. If they keep standing still, they're going to be in it like kippers. Office 2007? Fucker can't even share user resources properly. If I want to share contacts from 2007 to someone with 2003, I have to go onto his fucking machine and add myself in as an alternate mailbox. I have to go into tools, mail servers, exchange, add it in. WTF? And the stupid mail invite that goes out when you invite someone, nevermind getting permissions proper when it does things automagically. Grr!

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  38. collaboration dataloss bugs by guanxi · · Score: 4, Informative

    We tested and use Zoho and Google; both had serious collaboration bugs:

    * Users could overwrite each other's others changes without knowing it. For example if Amy edits a cell (in the spreadsheet app) or text (in the word processor), and the update doesn't reach Bob in time, Bob could overwrite the same data with his own.

    * Edits sometimes are not updated on other users' sessions quickly enough or, in some cases, at all.

    Before you count on it for serious work, beware. It seems like a fundamental issue they should have anticipated on day one.

  39. Re:Oh no, it's twitter again. by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

    Uh, except this guy's UID is a lot lower than twitter's. It's probably just someone genuinely agreeing...

    --
    All your base are belong to Wii.
  40. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but at some point people will become 'used to using' online tools, as they have become 'used to using' firefox (because its better) and liked I've become 'used to using' GMail because its convenient. Once these two ideas merge why spend money for software when it's convenient and better or equal to use an online app (assuming Johnny's term paper isn't full of corporate secrets, but hey maybe daddy's corporation should make their own online app? licensing...?).

  41. Print Version by thefekete · · Score: 1
    --
    The cool things is to have windows that bounce up and down like a good tits.
  42. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just got an email from a google developer working on google docs who saw my comment on above, and was happy that someone had noticed the improved performance. He says they started a feature freeze a few months ago, and spent the last few months working exclusively on performance.

  43. Huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If web-based office apps were any competition at all, then this post would be titled "GDocs is a Real Deal MS Office Killer". Its very obvious from the title itself that there is a lot of catching-up to do. We seen the same kind of posts with respect to Linux desktops vs Windows for years now haven't we?

  44. Yes! Good enough in 90% of the cases by dinther · · Score: 4, Informative

    I run my own one man IT business and all and I really mean ALL of the documentation is handled through Google Docs.

    It is great for collaboration purposes. Version management build in and to top it all off, I never have to worry about access or backup! Especially not with Google Gears that ensures access even when the internet is down (Never happens here)

    Now google docs is indeed not too great if you want to do Desktop publishing which is what some people seem to think MS Word is for. I do need the odd picture included in my documents but I wrote a little application to streamline that process.

    I made it available for free on my Google site of course. My program Pastry will archive every bitmap you copy and allow for easy upload to Google or anywhere else for that matter. Have a look on: http://vandinther.googlepages.com/pastry

    1. Re:Yes! Good enough in 90% of the cases by Zukix · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yup, collaboration must be a killer feature for a one-man shop.

    2. Re:Yes! Good enough in 90% of the cases by redkazuo · · Score: 1

      I run my own one man IT business [...] It is great for collaboration purposes.

      Come on now, I think you could collaborate fine with yourself with just notepad, couldn't you?

    3. Re:Yes! Good enough in 90% of the cases by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I've yet to have Google Gears work properly once.

      I think it may be because my Internet connection isn't just plain "not available", but instead it's a wifi with a weak signal which comes in and out. Nevertheless, every time I tried to access documents while offline, I saw nothing but:

      http://blakeyrat.com/2008/05/27/google-docs-offline-is-a-great-idea-too-bad-it-never-f-ing-works/

  45. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, whats the point of learning a popular markup language used in most academic articles while in college.

  46. Google with Gears will compete by Nano2Sol · · Score: 1

    Will anyone of them replace MS Office? Not in the short term but watch out for Google with Gears ready for their apps. The ability to work on docs etc. offline will appeal to a lot of people.

    1. Re:Google with Gears will compete by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if the competition at least caused MS Office to lower in price, but that doesn't seem to be happening either.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
  47. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't take 5 minutes to learn LaTex, if you are using the right software that will generate the syntax for you.

    If you are a computer science major, I found it difficult to understand why there is a problem with using a simple markup language.

    That being said, there is probably a misunderstanding somewhere, as LaTEX isn't a word processor, it is mainly used for typsetting proof and theorems. Try writting a 10 pages mathematical proof in OO.o every single week, now that's painful. Thanksfully, LaTex saved my days.

  48. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by pato101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was pissed off enough that she required us to use a program of her choice to generate a PDF that I simply didn't bother to learn.

    Seems you completely misunderstood what she was pretending: my guess is that she wanted you to learn another point of view in the field of documents creation.

    I just OO.o, same as always, and exported to PDF. The marker didn't know the difference.

    Just because she didn't say anything does not mean she didn't know. She knew most of you would not use LaTeX.

    This course I've driven a final career project, and convinced the boy to use LyX (I helped him installing it on windows, which is pretty easy by the way). At the beginning it was tricky for him, but after a couple of days he was comfortable. At the end he recognizes how much work he has avoided respect writing his work on MsOffice.
    The point is that his mates were puzzled about how elegant his work looked like. I've been reviewing some of the works and none come close to LaTeX look -further, there are some horrible looking ones-. Ensuring style consistency is pretty hard at tools so elastic as office packages are.

  49. Re:Litmus test - Yes by calagan800xl · · Score: 1

    I have a variety of resumes in different formats (from plain text to Flash depending on where I'm applying to), but for the more sober version, I'm pretty happy with the one I did in Google Docs. It's quite handy to be able to generate a .pdf wherever you are located.

  50. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

    Yeah, whats the point of learning a popular markup language used in most academic articles while in college.

    If you can't read the article without knowing the markup language, then it's not really a good language, is it? Regardless, I've only read 2 academic articles in my life (that can really be called that), and that's because they were assigned by the prof. One was mundane, and the other was ridiculous. They were distributed on paper, so I can't really tell what created them.

    We have things called textbooks that are a wealth of knowledge. I suggest you try them out sometime AC. I don't really have a whole lot of free time, and they tend to sort out the mundane/ridiculous from the good. (Assuming you purchase a good book, which can usually be discovered by asking your peers)

  51. Re:Oh no, it's twitter again. by SevenSpirits · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Please mod exactly two of parent, grandparent, great-grandparent and child up and the other two down.

  52. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

    Seems you completely misunderstood what she was pretending: my guess is that she wanted you to learn another point of view in the field of documents creation.

    This was a database class. Not a business class. I don't think that document creation is something I should really be concerned with. I quite honestly don't care what program creates the document. When I have to write documentation, it's usually in the form of a wiki, html, or source code comments. I don't think an office document is all that good of a medium for carrying most of the information I want to convey.

    Looking through my documents directory on my PC, I see a number of word processor documents. And do you know what they are? Resumes. Different versions of my resume. And I've NEVER written any sort of office document professionally.

    My problem was that it was a completely pointless exercise that had nothing to do with the material being taught in the class (Databases). LaTex might be the most awesome thing since sliced bread. I don't care. It was out of the scope of that class, and if I wanted to learn how to use it, I would do it in my own time. It's a trivial process (as you yourself have stated), but I have absolutely zero use for such a skill. I simply do not write documents, and I resented being forced to learn how to use a program I would never use again.

  53. It's where data originates that matters by vic-traill · · Score: 1

    A week ago I was booked for flight and hotel by a client's travel service. The e-ticket showed up in one of my Gmail accounts (multiple accounts with +append addresses and thought-through forwarding really does help) along with address info and an expense form. Google's integrated service meant that I was able to move between e-mail, the expense form and the mapping service while all the while auto-formatting/transferring documents between services. It worked very well.

    Seriously, it just wasn't worth the hassle of doing a Save As ... waiting for Office to fire up, and then attaching the resultant file(s) back into the mail service.

    Obviously YMMV, and I wasn't doing anything particularly sophisticated. But I could do everything I wanted in a browser, and that's where the data showed up originally, so why move it anywhere else?

    --
    [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
  54. Wua.la by iwein · · Score: 1

    I've been trying Wua.la (alpha) they enable P2P disk sharing, so you can actually share and access normal files over a P2P network. It's encrypted, so you shouldn't be exposed to peers reading your data.

    I love the theory, and I think it makes much more sense than the online alternatives.

    (I'm not related to Wuala other than being an enthusiastic user)

    --
    Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Wua.la by BBird · · Score: 1

      a good thing about online docs is the robust and clear version control. you know who edited what and when, and you can revert to previous version. not like the clumsy revision and track changes of ms office + unlogged file changes

  55. Re:No - SaaS is here to stay by beanerspace · · Score: 1

    Absolutely I "honestly think a business is going to allow its private correspondence to be handled over the Internet ...?"

    Only it's not "one of these programs" but a whole cornucopia of online office 'sweets' that are otherwise known Software as a Service or SaaS for short.

    And they're doing it in huge ways, just look at the dominance SalesForce has in the area of CRM applications, or the online offerings by 37 Signals."

    Fact is, the cross-platform, concurrent collaboration qualities of these SaaS based office tools are also making huge gains in moving the corporate world away from the office space and into the web space.

    Case in point, everyone who doesn't have a gmail account, please raise your hand? Yeah, I didn't think so.

  56. Re:interoperability more important than many reali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I also think that Google Docs is a very good solution for some scenarios such as small non-profits. I work with coffee coops and one of the biggest problems is maintaining machines running because they all want to run Windows OS and Office... from what I've seen, in the international arena Microsoft is one of the biggest stumbling blocks to any real development. Organizations that are strapped for resources spend too much time and money on maintaining their Windows crippled boxes.
    One of the things that I have done is to convince a few of them that they need to shift to Ubuntu, and to start using Google Docs (OO if not connected to the internet).
    So far one of the complaints I've heard is that the machines running ubuntu make them nervous because they are not crashing regularly... as if that was a bad thing. Also, by using Google Docs they have their vital documents backed up and not at risk of getting lost if the machine they are using gets damaged or stolen (there have been significant flooding in the last few weeks... at least the data is safe).

    Most of the world does not have the unlimited resources that US companies seem to have. Coffee growers in the global South have incomes that are well below the $4 bucks people spend for a Venti Caramel Machiatto (whatever that is... ), sharing their meager incomes with Microsoft should be considered a crime against humanity.
    So with this in mind, I think that any solution that is open source and improves the day to day experience people like the farmers I am working with, is the best route to take (I have not dealt with crashes now in a few weeks, nor do we have problems with viruses, malware, etc.)

  57. Re:File format! (Equation editor) by doxology · · Score: 1

    Have you tried latex2rtf? I don't know what it does with equations though...

    --
    sigfault. core dumped.
  58. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by pato101 · · Score: 1

    This was a database class. Not a business class.

    The value a professor should transmit to their students is much more than following certain program for certain subject. Think integral!.
    Students are sometimes busy and don't like working aside the established program. I understand that. But let me state that ignoring these extra works you lose opportunities to gather knowledge which can be good for your personal formation and which can feed your resume as well.
    Workarrounding your teacher requirements is a good point also, because you react an adapt instead of crying and complaining. Just hope you don't always do that way...

  59. Automation by heffrey · · Score: 1

    We use Office automation a lot at work. There's nothing else that comes close to matching.

    End of story (for us at least).

  60. simpler isn't always simpler by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    With an installed application you are subjected to fewer potential problems in my opinion. Even if it is Microsoft's Office suite you're subjected to their EULA and the length of time that they maintain the product and file formats. With an online suite you're subjected to all of those plus connectivity, privacy policy changes, business plans that don't model your own meaning that they may go out of business, and more.

    Except that all of these "pitfalls" may add up to much less than the pitfalls of relying on a local office suite and operating system. If you could be relatively certain that you can save documents such that if (when?) your Windows system crashes, you can reliably recover your data, would you call that a plus or a minus?

    If you can instantly coordinate the activity of people in several counties on a website, do you have a net loss since you don't also control the website?

    Combining a solid company with a strong contract can be very, very reliable when providing a technical solution.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  61. Re:File format! (Equation editor) by clive_p · · Score: 1

    Do any of the web based wordprocessors have a decent equation editor?

    Zoho writer has an equation editor which is usable - you should try it and see if you think it's "decent". The author of the software seems to be a Latex enthusiast.

  62. Is your data *that* invaluable? Really?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get real. Difference between you and "self respecting companies" is that they don't have a stash of porn they're trying hide.

    "Self respecting companies" usually have a CFO whose job it is to make sure that money gets spent wisely. Let's consider having you or some other geek team manage my corporate data vs. doing it at Google:

    Security:
      Geek: encrypts stuff, holds me hostage
      Google: Google datacenter security

    Risk:
      Geek: let's face it, would sell his mother (never mind the customer database) to get laid
      Google: Google approach to risk management

    Litigation & discovery:
      Geek: will send lawyers whatever he's been asked to by his boss, and maybe a bit extra "by mistake"
      Google: Will respond to specific and valid legal requests

    Service cost:
      Geek: can never have enough (hardware, salary, perks, etc.) can't bother to come in wearing a clean t-shirt
      Google: $50 a year. Regardless of volume or usage. Upgraded continually.

    I won't even mention the fact that you already trust a number of companies with your data - unless of course you've dug your own ditch and laid your own fibre between offices.

    Google is staffed by asswipes like every other company. Unlike your employer, they just manage that risk.

  63. Google Docs by doomedpr0digy · · Score: 1

    Is good and getting better. M$ has reason for concern. The article doesn't mention M$'s latest online offering to compete with these other services...I think that alone is an indication that they are being effected by them.

  64. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is way off-topic, but given the series of posts you've made, I think it needs to be said here.

    Sometimes, a course of study at a school is designed by people who are actually smart, and they weave general knowledge of the field and awareness of the possibilities carefully throughout the various classes on more specific subjects. When you're taking such a course, almost by definition it is unlikely that you have yet gained the skill and experience to appreciate this.

    Your attitude implies that you think you know better than your teachers, and that you insist on making your own judgements on the merits of what they teach. While both self-driven learning and healthy scepticism can be good things, you might like to stop occasionally and ask whether you are missing something that someone more experienced is trying to show you. From your posts here, it will be very clear to many of us who do work professionally that you have missed an opportunity to learn several useful things here: not only LaTeX, a widely used tool in its own right in some fields you might work in later, but also the experience that learning a new tool often doesn't take as long as you think, for example, and perhaps a few practical skills for preparing a good formal document. And you have given all this up just because instead of taking the enormous 5–10 minutes required to learn a new tool recommended by your teacher, you have stubbornly insisted on doing something your own way. If that is your mindset, you are pretty much doomed in any future career you might wish to pursue in the computing field.

    You do not know everything. Suck it up, learn a bit of humility, and make the most of opportunities to learn about stuff, because you will probably never have the same kind of opportunity again and you will regret it if you don't. And please don't think I'm writing this just to patronise you. I used to be like you, and so probably did a lot of the other posters here, and I bet every one of us would take a different approach if we could do it again.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  65. Re:Is your data *that* invaluable? Really?? by Nursie · · Score: 1

    I don't have a stash of porn either. In fact I have nothing to hide. That doesn't mean I want to share all of my information with third parties, even if they swear blind they won't look at it.

    Security:
    The data never leaves the company network
    vs
    it travels over the net and then gets stored by people I don't know

    Risk:
    The data never leaves the company network
    vs
    it travels over the net and then gets stored by people I don't know

    "Unlike your employer, they just manage that risk."

    You have no idea who I work for but I'll tell you this, it ain't Bub's Computer shack in South Buttfuck, Nowhere. Even if it was, it doesn't matter. trusting other companies to look after data is a bad plan from start to finish. Just look at all the leaks and losses.

    I know this is google and you'd fellate every last employee of theirs if you could, but that doesn't make it either a good idea or a solved problem.

  66. Webapps by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

    Initally I found it easy to think that web apps would displace desktop applications like Office. But the truth is, these solutions depend greatly on wireless technology. I need to be able to be connected to my documents everywhere. This is the reason thin clients just don't work... yet. I always picture the typical scenario of being on a plane. Until I have fast, broadband speed internet on a plane, these will not gain any footing on Office of OpenOffice.

  67. Let's come back to this discussion in 5 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and maybe have a good laugh then.
    S.

  68. if you think about it... by ypctx · · Score: 1

    1. keeping data on a hosting services provider - is a small company *really* more trusthworthy than Google, who actually has to care for their name? Can they get bribed, subpoeaned, bought-out more easy than Google?
    2. keeping data at home - is your home *really* better protected than Google's datacenters? From lightnings, tornadoes, floods, fires, thieves?

    1. Re:if you think about it... by Nursie · · Score: 1

      3. keeping data on your own company servers, with a secure offsite backup facility.

      Is it more secure?

      That remains to be proven. I prefer to keep things as untransmitted as possible. Especially in a commercial situation.

      And it's not like they'd have the only copy of the document. Sharing it with google can only increase your risk of them either losing, exposing or using your private information.

  69. Re:Webapps offline by BBird · · Score: 1

    most (including google docs) already have a offline+synv feature. still bulky but improving.

  70. The New Meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems the meme is about to morph from "Is This Teh Year of Teh Lunix On Teh Desktop?"... into "Is This Teh Year of Teh FOSS in Teh Office?".

    I have the feeling both will meet the same fate. Like Rick Flair said, "To be The Man, you have to beat The Man". And it doesn't appear anyone has what it takes to beat The Man... especially when there isn't even a financial incentive to do so.

  71. These alternatives missed their market by bamwham · · Score: 1

    There is a group of people who already do the majority of their publishing with a non-office like program. Many scientists write using LaTex or a variant. We do large collaborative projects with people scattered throughout the world at different institutions, we travel often, and our work need not (at least for those of us at public institutions) be kept very secure. Since Google docs started I've been writing them email begging for a Latex processor to be included. There are some online LaTex processors up and running, and while interesting they still have some problems which I had hoped google would try to fix.

  72. Re:No - SaaS is here to stay by ottothecow · · Score: 1
    hey...I've got a few gmail accounts...but when they make the system invite-only you are going to want to feel all exclusive and get in on it.

    I'm not saying it is a bad system--it's the best webmail out there--but give me my imap accounts and thunderbird any day. I would use it as an on-the-go system for checking my accounts but a lot of its great benefits are lost (the whole label/tag paradigm doesn't really jive with thunderbird although it would be a nice future direction).

    --
    Bottles.
  73. Paragraphs by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I keep looking at Google Docs, but so far the answer is no; it doesn't even replace WordPad. The main defect is that it doesn't support paragraph spacing. How they can claim it's a word processor without paragraph support is beyond me.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  74. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by kaiidth · · Score: 1

    Perhaps your prof was under the assumption that some/many of you would like to continue as postgraduates, in which case LaTeX is very useful indeed. From your opinion of the academic articles that you have read I guess that this is not terribly likely, but the AC is right that if you had wanted to continue in academia, or indeed if you had a long final report to write or similar, you would have likely found some knowledge of LaTeX very useful. Most of the major comp sci conferences prefer articles to be written using LaTeX and provide templates for this purpose, though some are kind enough to provide equivalent templates in MS Word that are nearly as effective, except that they are generally a pain in the backside to use because Word has its own ideas about everything.

    Still, as you say, you don't write documents and it is not a useful skill for you, which is fair enough. But it is a skill that could usefully be taught as part of a degree in CS, or physics, or other science in which LaTeX is widely used, so I can understand why your professor might have come to the conclusion that it is a reasonable thing to expect.

  75. Need Vision replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I can ever replace Microsoft Visio, I would say completely goodbye to Windows. I would love if Google, Sun or anyone else would release a Visio type application on the Web.

    The best killer Visio application was Netviz, but after it was purchased by Computer Associates, I lost track of the product.

    Here is to hoping that someone is listening.

  76. Party cheet sheets! by plunderphonic · · Score: 1

    In New York City, there are a bunch of things happening every weekend. My girlfriend and I put together a "cheat sheet" with the parties we know about, and our predictions about what will be cool. We then share it with 100 or so of our closest friends friends. They can add more information if they like. Very convenient! Everyone seems to like this system. p.s. Social geek with girlfriend? This is not a troll, I promise

  77. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

    Yes, I am very stubborn. Yes, I can be pig-headed. But I might lack humility. It really depends on who I'm talking to I think. I've had many teachers that I've looked up to, and did their extra work without complaint. This one in particular bothered the hell out of me. She was very stuck on processes and procedure. Drawing outside of the lines is something that I personally find real value in, and in her class, things had to be done her way or no way at all. I didn't appreciate that, and made it a point to subvert the process whenever possible.

    Do I regret not learning LaTex? A little. As you've mentioned, it really doesn't hurt to learn something new. I am a naturally inquisitive person, and I know a great deal of things that I will never use again, simply because they interested me. But I have a really bad taste in my mouth about LaTex, given that it was presented to me in such a way. If she had recommended its usage, I probably would have checked it out. But by requiring it, and telling us that assignments would not be graded if they weren't submitted with LaTex? That just challenged me to defy her. I took the alternate route, and generated them in OpenOffice, then altered the metadata to say they were generated with tex2pdf (or whatever the tool was called).

  78. Re:performance seems to have improved; who'll use by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

    Ah yeah, I can see that. There was really never much possibility of me going on to grad school. That's just a huge time commitment with very little payoff in the real world. I did take an extra year on my undergraduate degree to get a coop degree (I took 3 semesters back to back). And I think that was invaluable for preparing me for the real world. But I don't have much use for a Master's Degree, other than the cool sounding title.

    And I agree, it probably should be taught in computer science. But as I mentioned in another post a little down from here, my main problem with her teaching it to us was her presentation. I disliked being forced to use a tool of her choice. It was probably more difficult to defy her than simply learning the tool (I had to modify metadata with a hex editor). But I very much dislike it when a prof insists on a specific method of getting to a correct solution. The best profs that I've ever had will recommend a method, but if something works better for you, then they don't discourage that. (I'm not saying that every solution is created equal, or that a prof should allow a student to submit every assignment in assembly. But oftentimes there are many just-as-good solutions to a problem.)

  79. Host it yourself by splante · · Score: 1

    ThinkFree allows you to host the server yourself. You can make it available only via VPN or SSL if you like.

  80. Re:Oh no, it's twitter again. by repvik · · Score: 1

    Ok, so this whole "twitter" thing is just bullshit then... Was wondering about that. Do you really think twitter signed up early enough to get an uid that low?

  81. Re:Oh no, it's twitter again. by repvik · · Score: 1

    Indeed, I am not twitter. Thanks for noticing ;)
    (One may also check my posting history to see that I'm not)

  82. just a question by alexo · · Score: 1

    If you keep your documents and correspondence on a 3rd-party documents, what happens if at some time the regime declares your interests illegal and the service provider is persuaded (or eager) to support a fishing expedition?