Slashdot Mirror


Mars Soil Frustrates Phoenix Again

Tablizer writes "The Phoenix Mars lander has been frustrated yet again by Mars's odd soil. The wet nature of the soil they are targeting appears to have made it get stuck in the scoop rather than drop into the oven. Past problems with similarly clumpy soil may have damaged the lander because the vibrator had to be used longer than it was designed for, resulting in a short circuit."

62 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. Neato by Datamonstar · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's pretty interesting learning about the problems encountered while analyzing alien soil, but I'm not even going to touch that vibrator comment.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:Neato by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I'm not touching that vibrator either. Who knows where it has been shoved into.

    2. Re:Neato by chuckymonkey · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    3. Re:Neato by FlyingBishop · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mars, apparently. Didn't know he was into that sort of thing. But then he is Roman.

    4. Re:Neato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Waaaaaaallllll-EEEEE!!!!

    5. Re:Neato by oldhack · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, I ain't touching that with my 12" pole... something like that.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    6. Re:Neato by Benaiah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Besides the fact that your post was mostly rant there were a few good comments.

      All of the problems so far could have been fixed by a guy with a hand trowel. He could dig, sieve and work the vibrator.

      I think its time for a more general purpose robot to go.

      Also this really should have been more thoroughly tested. I mean one of those things that help you get icecream off the scoop would have been useful now. Guess next time they will think "what if the soil is clumpy" before blowing a cool 1/2 billion. I'd rather watch a redneck playing golf on the moon then hear about mars landers.

    7. Re:Neato by jberryman · · Score: 5, Funny

      $ man vibrator
      No manual entry for vibrator

    8. Re:Neato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Could be worse - it might have been Uranus, after all.

    9. Re:Neato by ibbey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Professor: "I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all."
      Fry: "Oh. What's it called now?"
      Professor: "Urectum."

    10. Re:Neato by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'd think NASA scientists knew more about the reliability of vibrating devices...

    11. Re:Neato by mjwx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Could be worse - it might have been Uranus, after all.

      Not really, the only thing we'll find by probing Uranus is gas.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:Neato by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll go there:
      "because the vibrator had to be used longer than designed, resulting in a short circuit" ... that's what she said!

      --
      stuff |
    13. Re:Neato by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

      to which phoenix replies to mars regarding the short circuit: "i swear, this has never happened before..."

      --
      Good people go to bed earlier.
  2. Fess up.... by WaxlyMolding · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many of you saw the word "vibrator" and clicked it?

  3. Vibrator had to be used for longer than designed.. by greenguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's got to be a joke in here somewhere.... Wet nature... Drop into the oven... Got to think... Lemme get another beer.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
  4. Re:Vibrator had to be used for longer than designe by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's got to be a joke in here somewhere.... Wet nature... Drop into the oven... Got to think... Lemme get another beer.

    Why stop there? Anything can be a euphemism.

    Frustrates phoenix...Wet nature...drop into the oven...get stuck in the scoop...damaged the lander...and of course, the universal problem everyone faces: ...the vibrator had to be used longer than designed, resulting in a short circuit.

    --
    An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
  5. Re:YHBT by exley · · Score: 4, Funny

    Considering that this is from the "pulling-out-doesn't-sound-manly dept." I think the editor was all too happy to play along.

    Timothy may also be getting an email shortly from Taco.

  6. Definition of 'wet'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What exactly is 'wet' about the soil? I see that the soil is icy (H2O ice or CO2 ice?), but as far as I knew 'wet' and 'icy' are mutually exclusive. Perhaps 'sticky' would be a better term? Or... is this some kind of cool ice that is 'wet' at very cold temperatures as opposed to good old fashioned dry ice?

    1. Re:Definition of 'wet'? by dnwq · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Wet" and "icy" are not mutually exclusive. Go watch an ice-cube melt.

    2. Re:Definition of 'wet'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      the melting point of ice isn't 0 degrees C, except at one standard atmosphere of pressure, which Mars doesn't have.

    3. Re:Definition of 'wet'? by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ahh but the triple point of water is pretty close to zero C, so you have to check the phase diagram to see whether it melts or sublimes at mars surface temp.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  7. PLEASE TAG VIBRATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This would make my day. I'm a girl btw :)

    1. Re:PLEASE TAG VIBRATOR by khing · · Score: 3, Funny

      i'm going to be really immature and say "pics or ban" :P

  8. A phoenix using an oven! by pagewalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Phoenix putting something into an oven... there go our tax dollars! Any competent phoenix would wait until its body burst into flame, then use the spare heat to analyze the sample.

    I don't know about you, but I intend to write to my Congressperson.

    ---
    Thousands are enslaved every day: http://www.riverofinnocents.com/

    --
    Thousands are enslaved every day. A River of In
  9. Re:Vibrator had to be used for longer than designe by RuBLed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The research data collected from this event would be used to pave the way for human colonization of Mars. I hope...

  10. Preparation Oversight by Joebert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't mean to troll, but I'd like to think that in a mission they're hoping to find water or ice or something along those lines, they'd anticipate the possibility of moist soil when designing their instruments.

    Hopefully the next mission includes an icecream scoop.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Preparation Oversight by moteyalpha · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree with that, I can't imagine sending something that far away and not testing it with every weird thing that you might find in a child's room like gum in hair, silly putty, slinkies, plastic peanuts, ice cream, cheese whiz, dry ice and on and on, It does seem a rather large oversight in testing. BTW the jokes were great and I assume that the article was somewhat of a setup for that. Now -that- is good planning, informative and easy jokes.

    2. Re:Preparation Oversight by thewiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like the soil is the consistency of clay. Trying to get clay out of a scoop takes water and a lot of patience.

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  11. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you use the vibrator, obviously the scoop is going to get wet.

  12. Re:Inadequate testing? by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i'm guessing the lower gravity is why it didn't work scooping wet dirt like it did on earth. i'm pretty sure they tested it as well as possible.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  13. Bad vibrator by mdemonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's how it goes when they send a vibrator to do a mans job. Anyway, are the exploring that hole they found a while back?

    1. Re:Bad vibrator by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's how it goes when they send a vibrator to do a mans job. Anyway, are the exploring that hole they found a while back?

      Oh come on!

      You can send 1000 vibrators for the price of one man.

      Vibrators always do what they are told.

      Vibrators never get tired...

  14. Unmanned missions by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The nice thing about robomissions is that they are so much cheaper than manned missions and there are no widows when things do wrong.

    Because they are relatively cheap you can screw up plenty and still do the work for less cost than a manned mission.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Unmanned missions by RetroGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The nice thing about robomissions is that they are so much cheaper than manned missions and there are no widows when things do wrong.

      And yet all it would take is for a human to crumble the soil in his hand.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    2. Re:Unmanned missions by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they are relatively cheap you can screw up plenty and still do the work for less cost than a manned mission.

      The problem is, they aren't relatively cheap. You pay a fraction of the cost, and you get less than a fraction of the science.

    3. Re:Unmanned missions by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, humans are far more adaptable and can modify plans and experiments in a way no robot yet built could. Sometimes, you have to take the risks. If you want to consider costs, then let's say a robust manned mission costs fifty times as much as a robot mission. If you consider the missions that produced uncertain results (Viking landers and early probe photographs), minimal results (Phoenix) or no results at all (everything that has crashed), you are beginning to approach the cost of a manned mission, where a manned mission could have produced ALL of the useful data so far collected AND much of the data that has been lost due to unexpected conditions and unforeseen circumstances.

      Yes, manned missions are extremely risky, and that means a danger of bereavement, but it is better to die with your boots on, making the discoveries of a lifetime, than to live in fear at the back of a cave. Indeed, if we look at places that are most risk-averse, we see that unexpected risks (when they arise) are actually the more dangerous for it. Risk aversity is no healthier than plunging straight into danger without care. Indeed, in a way, it is the same thing, except being risk-averse means you are always plunging into unknown dangers, never known ones. The correct solution is always to be risk-aware, to anticipate and minimize, but never to eliminate, danger. Eliminating danger is probably the most dangerous thing you can ever do.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Unmanned missions by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I strongly agree. One of my life mottos is:

      "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
      Mark Twain

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    5. Re:Unmanned missions by Shihar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are two very large problems with a manned Mars mission.

      1) It cost a shit ton of money. Don't give me "but it just costs X days of Iraq war!!!" crap. That might be true, but Americans will open up their pocket books for "making the world a safer place". They lynch presidents that spend a few trillion on science experiments. Sure, we did it with Apollo, but that fell into the "making the world a safer place... by kick the ass of the communist in a metaphorical sense". If it Apollo had been pure science, it would have never of flown. Because Apollo was about one upping the commies, we were okay with it.

      2) It is a suicide mission. Sure, there are plenty of people that would sign up for a suicide mission if it meant they got to stick their boot print on Mars first. That doesn't change the fact that it would never fly. Americans, and even more extreme, Europeans, are extraordinarily risk adverse to the point of absurdity. Pools kill thousands of kids and no one really cars. Unhealthy food kills an absurd number of Americans (millions) and we just shrug it off. Toss an airplane into a building and kill a couple thousand and all of a sudden it is OMG OMG LETS CHANGE SOCIETY AND TOSS OUT CIVIL LIBERTIES TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS MINOR AMOUNT OF DEATH NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN!!!11!!! KILL ALL THE ARABS!!!! NEVER AGAIN!!!1!!!! Europeans are even sillier these days where NATO and UN have to beg plead and extort to get a handful of European soldiers to come within a few hundred miles of a place where they might possibly get shot at. NASA blows up a shuttle filled with adrenaline junkies every quarter of a century, and now we can't fly the foolish things if a bird happens to fly by and drop a shit on one before it takes off.

      Our (western) priorities are so far out of whack and screwed up that this will never happen. The monetary argument is at least logical and something I can get behind. The utter terror at letting someone willingly sacrifice themselves doing something they want to do is a sign that our lives are way the hell too comfy.

      Space exploration is dead to humans until someone finds a cheap way for individuals to get into space, governments to damned. The second you can head west, hit the California coast, and go up a few thousand miles, you will have the US population drop by 10% as the crazy pioneer genes that are still floating around from the crazy immigrants that pushed into the US over the past few hundred years reassert themselves and people throw themselves into space.

      Until that day, the pragmatic and rational folks are going to tell you to fuck off once they see the price tag, and the people begging for a nanny state will break down into tears cry about the inhumanity of it all to let a person willing sacrifice themselves.

    6. Re:Unmanned missions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Speak for yourself there. Why exactly should we come and clean up after you start not one, but two illegal and pointless wars?

      As a European (a Finn), I'd like to correct you: The war in Aghanistan has at no point been illegal and maybe your memory isn't all that good but European strongly supported action against Aghanistan as a consequence of their decision not to hand over Osama - NATO members to the point that they for the first time in the history of the organization invoced the collective defence clause. One source of many:
      http://www.euractiv.com/en/general/nato-invokes-collective-defence-clause-support-us/article-113773

      The war in Iraq was illegal because international law states (in brief) that
      (1) military action against another country is illegal except in two cases:
      (2) it's legal as an immediate defensive action
      (3) it's legal if it has a UN mandate

      Arguably, neither case was true and ironically any military action by Iraq against the US would've been legal but actually probably only resulted in making action by the US slightly legitimate instead. Considering that the US had recognized Iraq's independence and is a UN member and in its constitution talks about honouring all treaties with foreign powers (and I'd say that UN membership is a treaty with plenty of foreign powers) it wasn't necessarily illegal under international law only... But that's for Americans to decide and sort out appropriately.

      And just in case your curious, I'd like to add that when the Iraq war began, I was personally in favour of it (to some extent as a consequence of an Iraqi friend here being cautiously optimistic about it then). With the benefit of hindsight, I'm tempted to say that once Saddam was toppled, the US should've pretty much gotten the fuck out and left the Iraqis to shape their country into something better. That way the action would only have served to speed up what would've happened anyway at some point - eventually the Iraqis themselves would've gotten rid of him one way or another. The result now could hardly be worse than the current situation and I fail to see why the US couldn't have gotten back in, if necessary. The worst case would of course have been a country with various factions fighting each other, which isn't very tempting to invade so any estimate of the number of casualties made beforehand would've been made higher (and thus probably closer to what the number has turned out to be now) and such an invasion would obviously have been harder to sell to a domestic audience - not to mention to explain to the masses when there's no single "bad guy" to get rid of anymore. Sadly, I've - whilst following the news - seen signs that the Iraqis just might have done a pretty good job. To me the suggestion many Iraqis made to instead of creating a new Iraqi army "clean" the existing one and let that maintain order. It was a functioning army so simply trying officers suspected of war crimes could've gotten it in shape quickly. But all that is of course pointless speculation.

    7. Re:Unmanned missions by Soporific · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he's posting from Mars? ;)

      ~S

  15. All that money.. by handmedowns · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And we couldn't implement "ice-cream" scoop technology =P

    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  16. Re:Vibrator had to be used for longer than designe by j01123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's got to be a joke in here somewhere....

    Mars hasn't had contact with any life forms in hundreds of millions of years, at least. Of course it needed an unusually long time with the vibrator.

  17. Re:Inadequate testing? by emeade · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After the loss of the first vehicle, they did extensive testing. The whole Phoenix story is truly rising from the ashes, and very interesting. I think it was on the Discovery channel.

    My first thought was gravity as well, though I'd think we have enough physics simulations that we could at least do simulated testing under low grav. Looking at the homepage for Phoenix, it looks like they are looking into heat caused by the rasping might be contributing to the problem. Digging holes on Mars just isn't the same as digging them in your backyard, at least not yet.

  18. Except.... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He would not have survived the trip or the landing.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Except.... by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

      So send a politician.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  19. Re:One sad conclusion by goldsaturn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, we could have found out exactly what Martian soil is like beforehand. We should just send up a robot to scoop some up and analyze it...oh wait.

  20. MOD PARENT INTERESTING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since I'm a guy and all :)

    1. Re:MOD PARENT INTERESTING by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mod grandparent unique, given it's slashdot and all.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  21. Actually, by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this was tested in all sorts of areas around the earth. To make something like this IS difficult. It is part of the reason why I really want to see us on mars. Once we are there, all the exploration will continue to be by robotics. It is just that ppl on the planet will put these systems together as well as fix them. I suspect that the fun jobs will still be handled by ppl on earth.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  22. One Big Mega-Probe, or Incremental? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your joke raises an interesting question: is it cheaper to send up a single big swiss-army probe that has everything, or simpler probes that use lessons borrowed from the last probe? Phoenix is relatively cheap, probe-wise, such that its not like we put all our eggs in one basket on this one. A later probe can now be more focused to the task based on known soil characteristics.

    It is hard to calculate a clean answer to such questions without having some experience with different designs. Mars is still a new world. Our experience with biology experiments with Viking suggests that the incremental approach may be better. We've learned how Mars may "trick" such experiments and how sneaky life can be based on Earth samples. We can now design experiments that rule out the traps that Viking discovered. Sure, we'll probably find new traps along the way, but nobody says exploration must be easy.
             

  23. Perhaps, just perhaps.... by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Informative

    They should have had you on the mission? I am sure that you really would have expected the exact kind of conditions that they had. After all, being nearly 2x as far from the sun, in the middle of winter, you might be more worried about hardness of items rather than stickiness, but that is just me. To be honest, I seriously doubt that you or the other ludites could even get a rock off this planet let alone deliver something to another planet.

    BTW, if NASA is SOOO incompetent, why do they have a much better record at delivering vehicles to other planets than ANY other group? Me, I have my issues with them, but I have worked on a small part of MGS and know that there is a lot involved. These folks are doing good work.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  24. Re:Lotta problems on Mars by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seems that Mars is a harsh mister

  25. Re:One sad conclusion by typo83 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You ever run a front end loader? In January when the temperature is 9 below zero Fahrenheit? You know the 'scoop' on the front of the loader is called a 'bucket'? What happens when the loader operator digs into a pile of steaming coal, or gravel? The material is 'steaming' because it is warmer and wet than ambient air. The bucket is -9 degrees F, and the material freezes in the bucket. What does come out of the bucket goes into a dump truck (in some cases), where it freezes to the inside walls, corners and bottom of the dump body. At the end of the day, the truck driver, and the loader operator have to dig that material out by hand, with a shovel. Been there, done that. Why would it be any different on mars with colder temperatures, and 38% earth normal gravity?

  26. Not wet by katakomb · · Score: 5, Informative

    The word "wet" implies the presence of a meaningful amount of liquid water. In this regard, the soil at the site is very unlikely to be wet (and note that the linked articles don't actually say that it is). The temperature and pressure conditions at the site only allow for solid and gas phases for H2O. Solid ice slowly converts to gas through sublimation when the ice is exposed by the scoop. Materials can clump for a variety of reasons. For example, lunar soil can cling to itself and to things like spacesuits even though absolutely no water is present at all. All sorts of factors can influence the cohesion of planetary soils, including the physical shapes of soil grains, the electrostatic properties of the grains, binding by spatter through micrometeorite bombardment (unlikely on Mars due to atmospheric protection) and, in the case of the Mars soils, even small amounts of ice have the potential to bind grains.

  27. Yo mama by devotedlhasa · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yo mama ... may have damaged the lander because the vibrator had to be used longer than designed

  28. Don't worry by krkhan · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Phoenix isn't working, I'm sure Firefox shall fix all that stuff.

  29. Phoenix Mars Mission Logo by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It looks suspiciously similar to the Firefox logo, I wonder if the artist was the same. At least he got the face pointed in the right direction this time.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  30. I can see the fleet street headlines by EEPROMS · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA scientists break vibrator

  31. Re:One sad conclusion by KingRobot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Phoenix was built by the UofA... No wet, clumpy soil in AZ.

  32. Silly idea? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if it would be that silly to try and turn the scooper upside down and LIGHLTY bang it on the inside of the oven so that gravity can do the rest and let it fall out...although I dont know how sturdy that oven is nor do I know if the robot is able to apply small pressure turns instead of full tilt ones.

  33. Worked fine in the lab by grikdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like one too many what-ifs got pruned from the decision tree. Nice. Probably saved a couple million bucks on the ground, got the pup out the door, and sent it all the way to Mars before it flushed its entire budget into thin air. Speaking as a taxpayer, at least the show's been entertaining.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_