Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Bets Big On Computing For the Car

dstates writes "The automobile industry may be hurting, but Microsoft is doubling down and making a massive new investment in its automotive business unit. Microsoft already works closely with a number of car companies and will enhance that effort with more people and more resources. Sync developed as a collaboration with Ford Motor Co. allows motorists to control their cell phones, music players and navigation systems with voice commands while they drive. Microsoft is also making 'Live Search' technology available to automakers to develop in-car search and navigation. Detroit native Tom Philips, the new unit leader said 'There are a lot of technologies that are two to three years out that are going to provide even more connectivity and innovation. There's such a disconnect between what people experience in their cars and what they experience in the rest of their lives.'"

11 of 378 comments (clear)

  1. TomTom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The major navigation units like TomTom run embedded linux.

    1. Re:TomTom by wireloose · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have a TomTom and it's a darned nice unit. The cheapest model is around $100 (refurbished) from places like TigerDirect.com. I bought two of them, and they're more than enough for the wife and me. I can't foresee MS making anything that cheap that goes into a car.

  2. Of course! by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's going to be as big as tablet computing, I tell you!

    As someone who drives a 8.5 year old car (and is still happy with it) without a board-computer like the ones Microsoft sells, I still don't see the need for one. I do have a "board-computer" but it only calculates l/100km, driven time, and stuff like that. I don't think it uses an operating system.

    In-car entertainment is something I cannot comprehend. If you've got kids they most certainly have a Gameboy or something like that, or they can read a book. That's what I did when I was a kid doing long trips (Okay, it was a Game Gear, but that's not a big difference). On short trips enterainment systems shouldn't even be turned on.

    The only value I could see is a GPS system, but that really doesn't have to be based on Windows. Even then, in the 14 years I drive, I have rarely felt the need for a GPS. The few times I was in a foreign city without a map (and if you got there, you make sure you actually have a map *grin*).

    Anyway, I know this is just my opinion and my needs are surely not reflected in what "Joe Driver" needs. Now get off my lawn!

  3. Obligatory by Belaj · · Score: 5, Funny

    Deploy airbag? [Cancel | Allow]

  4. experience?! by jcgam69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's such a disconnect between what people experience in their cars and what they experience in the rest of their lives.

    I have a novel idea: maybe we should focus on DRIVING while we're in the car.

  5. Re:Slightly off-topic by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's that, the geek equivalent of wrapping it around a tree?

    Just doesn't have the same ring to it..."So I jailbroke my Mustang, and then the new firmware bricked it, and now it's just sitting in my driveway saying, 'Please to fasten seat belt' over and over again...So...You wanna go sit in it?"

    It's just not going to draw the girls.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  6. Re:You can pry it from my cold dead hands by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want to retain control of my car, thank you very much, and adding a bunch of so called 'var computers' is not going to do that.

    Keep your grubby mitts off my vehicle.

    It's far too late for that. You "lost" control of your cars in the early 80's, when they started using computers to regulate everything from fuel flow to your transmission. The only difference now is that you can actually see the computer interface.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  7. Re:a prediction by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    PREDICTION: Microsoft is rehashing old failed attempts again...

    They did this in the 90's with the autoPC platform. it was an utter failure.

    Just like how tablet pc's have been a failure to the masses over and over and over again..

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  8. Hmmm by Kelbear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Detroit native Tom Philips, the new unit leader said 'There are a lot of technologies that are two to three years out that are going to provide even more connectivity and innovation. There's such a disconnect between what people experience in their cars and what they experience in the rest of their lives.'"

    Maybe, just maybe, the reason for the disconnect is that we're in a giant heap of metal hurtling at 70mph amid a bevy of other giant heaps of metal.

    I think we should preserve that disconnect.

  9. Re:why not an AC socket or a microwave oven, inste by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With all these electric cars, when will they put in something really useful instead of this flaky electronic shit, especially from MS?

    Actually, it turns out that these things (automotive entertainment systems0 actually have to be extremely reliable. Windows Embedded for Automotive has to be way more robust than regular Windows Embedded, for example. The pressure comes from the car manufacturers themselves, not the public.

    The reason is quite simply, if the system fails within the warranty period, it's a warranty repair. Warranty repairs are expensive, especially with prices dropping and margins thinning. Like the technology sector, a profit or a loss can be made simply by the amount of warranty work that needs to be done. (As a side benefit, people perceive a car that has to be in the shop to be of way lower quality, even if it's in the shop because the entertainment system keeps dying). Anyone remember the classic VW radio with the anti-theft that keeps going off on the slightest electrical spike?

    Here's the other nasty thing about automotive systems - the parts must be available for years after the model is discontinued. With external DVD players, aftermarket stereos/DVD players, etc., it's not a big deal since the owner can buy a new one. But that new in-dash GPS/radio/climate control/etc. unit, if it breaks within that time period, it has to be replaced. (Think about all those 5 year "bumper to bumper" warranties, too). Given how fast technology moves, it's actually quite difficult to design a system and still have parts available for it 5-10 years after it was made.

  10. Re:Late to the party by Bert64 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally i'd prefer not to have digital convergence...

    What i want instead, are the separate systems...
    Multiple separate units that each do one function well and work together, allowing me to replace one piece at a time.

    I have a tape deck that is 20+ years old, a turntable that is 20+ years old (i have very little media to play on either of them anymore), a radio that's a year old (digital), a radio thats 10+ years old (analog), a cd player thats about 10 years old, a streaming media player that's a couple of months old, several games consoles etc etc, all connected through an amplifier that's around 5 years old, and a TV that's less than 1 year.
    I replace it piece by piece as i need new stuff, i have very few tapes or vinyl records, but i do listen to them occasionally so buying a modern all in one system that didn't support them at all would be a pain. Also as stuff gets replaced it's repurposed, my old TV is in the bedroom for instance.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!