Slashdot Mirror


India's "$10 Laptop" To Cost $100 After All

narramissic writes "In case you missed it, India's Minister of State for Higher Education yesterday announced the development of a $10 laptop that will target higher education applications. There were no specifications given for the laptop and the rock-bottom price raised questions about government subsidies. Today, the figure was corrected: It's not a $10 laptop; it's a $100 laptop. Still no specs though."

146 comments

  1. Give it a day... by Greenmoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll have it up to $1000.

    Pesky decimal points....

    1. Re:Give it a day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      are they sourcing it from Zimbabwe?

    2. Re:Give it a day... by negRo_slim · · Score: 1
      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    3. Re:Give it a day... by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did they calculate their costs with a Pentium II?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    4. Re:Give it a day... by Bender_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed, wasn't there a similar indian initiative that never really caught on? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simputer

    5. Re:Give it a day... by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, it was calculated by Verizon.

    6. Re:Give it a day... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      And falling dollar...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    7. Re:Give it a day... by orasio · · Score: 1

      I think we have already gone trough this before.
      The guys were planning on getting the laptop for $100 in the long term. In the begginning it was supposed to be higher.
      Add that to the fact that $100 back then were worth as much in china as 130 dollars now, and it adds up easily.
      I don't think OLPC actually missed the price objective (itÂs still less than . They just underestimated their enemies.

    8. Re:Give it a day... by homesnatch · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Zimbabwe, each laptop would cost 10 trillion.

    9. Re:Give it a day... by operagost · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It was the original Pentium from 60 to 90 MHz that had the floating-point bug. Don't feel bad: apparent at least two mods didn't know that either.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Give it a day... by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it was the Pentium Pro line from 60 to 100 MHz. I don't feel bad. You didn't remember correctly either.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug

      I did remember it being the 66 MHz FSB P6 core, which I mistakenly remembered as being early P2's. They were actually Pentium Pro's.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:Give it a day... by ovoskeuiks · · Score: 1

      Oooo an internet argument count me in. There was no 60 - 100MHz Pentium Pro's they started at 150Mhz it was the original Pentium that had the fault.

    12. Re:Give it a day... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Add to that the price target also reflects all the required software built in. So it is not $100 for the hardware plus $500 worth of software, it is $100 total. So India's effort is just another part of the global push to get low cost laptops including software (not software as an after market budget bloating shock) into the hands of every child rather that tons and tons of very expensive high carbon impact dead trees.

      So whether it is the first world or a rapidly developing 'ex' third world, they are all looking for the same solution. Obviously working together in an open format for the good of school children all over the globe would make sense.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    13. Re:Give it a day... by Cyanara · · Score: 1

      No, they just outsourced.

    14. Re:Give it a day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simputer was not a bad product at all. It lacked the right kind of support by the government and other institutions when the promoters of the product needed it. At a time when Indian IT was largely riding on software skills, outsourcing and bodyshopping some young professors of the Indian Institute of Science came up with the bold idea of making a low-cost handheld computing device. Things did not work out for no fault of theirs. India missed a great opportunity.

    15. Re:Give it a day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, the original Pentium, not the Pentium Pro or Pentium II. As described in the Wikipedia page linked by the moronic grandparent! If you're going to post links to back up arguments it's worth checking that it does!

    16. Re:Give it a day... by edittard · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was this morning, it'll be 20 trillion by lunchtime.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    17. Re:Give it a day... by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      Each laptop costs Z$1 000.

      Tomorrow, each laptop will cost Z$10 trillion.

      Giden Gn removed ten zeros.

      Fixed it for you.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    18. Re:Give it a day... by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Informative

      What really hurt computer is you couldn't buy them, even as they advertised them to you.

      I thought the better one was a pretty good deal, and it's picture based note taking appealed to me (more than handwriting recognition). As a goofy American doing there job (or whatever it said on their website) I wanted one. I contacted them, and there was no response. Not even a "We only sell in bulk". Not shocking that not many were sold.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    19. Re:Give it a day... by kabocox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, wasn't there a similar indian initiative that never really caught on?

      http://www.amidasimputer.com/

      It looks like it did catch on. Just that it looks like a PDA to us. I wish the folks that make the barbie laptop would just license that, stick a barbie case on it, and sell it in the toy department here. There would need to be a hotwheels model too, but then I could get one for each of the kids.

    20. Re:Give it a day... by operagost · · Score: 1

      I made one small error (90 for 100) and was modded down. Then someone responded with far more incorrect info and was modded up. See you in metamod!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:Give it a day... by coppermine · · Score: 1

      No. They just used a prototype of that $10 lappy..

    22. Re:Give it a day... by thexile · · Score: 1

      No no, it is Microsoft Excel!!!

  2. In before... by gparent · · Score: 5, Funny

    They must've added Windows to it?

    1. Re:In before... by dashesy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is all for poor and needy. 9$ Hardware. 10$ for poor oil industry (was 1$ for transportation before). 45$ for poor M$ stockholders. 36$ for poor politicians.

    2. Re:In before... by darkheart22 · · Score: 0

      nice....

      --
      Ever to excel
  3. Don't you just hate typos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It should have read â10. It's about $100

  4. Sheesh... by religious+freak · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm getting tired of seeing people screw up on OLPC, I think I must've seen this type of stuff at least .01 times

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011

      Ur a geek

    2. Re:Sheesh... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011

      Ur a geek

      Oh sure AC, go ahead and post the answer after I figure it out, and after I have figured it out, THEN I notice your post beneath my threshold.

      Damn you!

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  5. It's only $99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're willing to use non-buggy CPU that sometimes moves the decimal.

  6. Common sense by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 2, Funny

    There were no specifications given for the laptop and the rock-bottom price raised questions about government subsidies.

    You don't need to read the label on a $0.35 chocolate bar to figure out it's made of 3% chocolate, 60% fat, 20% lecithin, and 27% wrapping.

    1. Re:Common sense by reverseengineer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd definitely pay more than 35 cents for a candy bar whose ingredients totalled 110% of its contents, just to find out how that was possible.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:Common sense by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Duh.

      Willy Wonka math.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Football coaches do that 110% math all the time. Can't be that hard.

    4. Re:Common sense by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it's just an overlap. ie. the 27% wrapping also happens to contain 10% of the over-all fat content... To get the full caloric values listed on the label, you have to eat the wrapper.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Common sense by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      Peperami is 108% pork. :D

    6. Re:Common sense by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > I'd definitely pay more than 35 cents for a candy bar whose ingredients totalled 110% of its contents, just to find out how that was possible.

      Actually, just today while shopping I noticed a sausage with the following label (paraphrasing as I'm too lazy to go downstairs to check): "100 kg of this product contains 160 kg of pork, 20 kg of beef, spices, ...".

      In addition to some sort of reverse synergy magick of the ingredients, they also for some reason decided to show that for a 100 kg, instead of 100g or standard portion size as it is usually done with foods. Not that it matters due to the wonders of the metric system, but who the fuck eats 100 kg of sausage? The record consumption of various meats seem to be around 1.5 - 3kg.

    7. Re:Common sense by edittard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Was it a dry kind of sausage, like salami? If so, the reason is probably water loss.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  7. $10? $100? Both are shocking prices.. by Channard · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... I mean, how the hell am I supposed to sell people a $400 extended warranty on top of that?

  8. Ah, thats the ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    OLPC started as $100 laptop, but now its double the price... so this $10 laptop is now $100! So, this is the real $100 Laptop

    1. Re:Ah, thats the ticket by justdrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah but the value of the dollar's fallen a LOT since when it was announced as 100.

    2. Re:Ah, thats the ticket by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      yeah but the value of the dollar's fallen a LOT since when it was announced as 100.

      Assuming you mean the US dollar... it's certainly not had as bad a time of it as the Zimbabwean Dollar.

      When you're talking in the tens or hundreds of billions (yes, that's billions- 10^9- not millions) of dollars for basic foodstuffs like eggs and bread, you know your economy's in the shit. (*)

      Particularly when your president announces that he's going to devalue the currency by knocking off 10 zeroes.

      (*) I did have the idea of getting my hands on some Zimbabwean currency to sell as a joke ("you *too* can be a genuine billionaire/trillionaire! Impress your friends") and use for tongue-in-cheek competitions ("Win a billion dollars!" etc) Unfortunately, given that this relied on a situation with some very unfunny implications for those actually living in Zimbabwe, I quickly realised that this would also be in very poor taste, and my conscience nixed the idea.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Ah, thats the ticket by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      (*) I did have the idea of getting my hands on some Zimbabwean currency to sell as a joke ("you *too* can be a genuine billionaire/trillionaire! Impress your friends") and use for tongue-in-cheek competitions ("Win a billion dollars!" etc) Unfortunately, given that this relied on a situation with some very unfunny implications for those actually living in Zimbabwe, I quickly realised that this would also be in very poor taste, and my conscience nixed the idea.

      Actually it's probably the best way that you could help out. If enough people bough the currency then the supply would go down and the value would go up. You would be reducing inflation. Go for it!

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    4. Re:Ah, thats the ticket by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, when you're comparing your economy to that of Zimbabwe, you know your economy is in the crapper.

    5. Re:Ah, thats the ticket by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Actually it's probably the best way that you could help out. If enough people bough the currency then the supply would go down and the value would go up. You would be reducing inflation. Go for it!

      Thereby you'd also be making the currency you've just bought more valuable. That's like some sort of financial perpetual motion machine!

      And to the GP: people nowadays are humorless dicks and will probably sue you for a billion US dollars, at which point you'd be better off moving to Zimbabwe. Still, $Zim is easy to get on Ebay. That banknote will be worth less than a $USD 5 by the time the database is update with this post, so the ebay operation's ROI must be pretty good.

      Unfortunately the Zim government decided to drop 10 zeroes from its currency, somewhat crippling their chances of beating the German and Hungarian records of hyperinflation.

    6. Re:Ah, thats the ticket by proselyte_heretic · · Score: 1

      My history teacher bribed me with 500 BILLION Yugoslavian dollars (Jugoslavija) to stay at my school.

    7. Re:Ah, thats the ticket by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      "Thereby you'd also be making the currency you've just bought more valuable"

      Well, yeah, but it's conservative. So if you try to cash in, you just get back what you put in, unless a bunch of people buy currency and you're the only one that sells it back.

      And yeah, people are dicks. Humorless, too, if they think it'll bring them advantage. But Pepsi shouldn't have advertised a Harrier for such a low number of points when the actual unit price the military was paying was pretty well known. Also, offering a product for sale that they couldn't buy for national security reasons was probably not the greatest of ideas either.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Ah, thats the ticket by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      And to the GP: people nowadays are humorless dicks and will probably sue you for a billion US dollars

      Nah, firstly because I'd make completely clear in the case of selling them that it was Zimbabwean dollars that were worth bugger all and intended for a "joke". And in the second case (the competition) it'd still be obviously tongue-in-cheek and include a (prominent enough) disclaimer.

      And the other reason is that because I'm in the UK people wouldn't (or *shouldn't*) assume that they're US dollars anyway!

      However, as I said, although in isolation it's a practical idea (IMHO), it'd be insensitive and in somewhat poor taste given the real financial hardship being suffered by the Zimbabweans as a result of the currency crash. To be honest, I'd feel like some odious toff laughing at something I wouldn't find remotely funny if it affected me.

      And yeah, I realise that buying the currency might improve things slightly, but not by a lot, and it'd give the cause of all this trouble, Robert Mugabe, another excuse to make the British look bad and pass the blame.

      BTW, yeah, I did notice that they were devaluing the currency- I mentioned and linked that in my original post! It won't stop the problem, although whether things'll still get bad to a factor of 10^9 *again* is unclear.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  9. With the way the US economy is going... by langelgjm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just give it some time, the dollar will get there.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:With the way the US economy is going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      hopefully the users of this laptop will have to call and talk to someone with a thick, indecipherable American accent to get tech support. Fair is fair.

  10. I would even call 'BS' on a $100 laptop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seems like someone's outsourced bullshitting to India now.

    1. Re:I would even call 'BS' on a $100 laptop. by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      Oh, it wasn't outsourced.

      --
      -
    2. Re:I would even call 'BS' on a $100 laptop. by smorken · · Score: 1

      With the way things are going, India might end up outsourcing the manufacture of this laptop to America.

    3. Re:I would even call 'BS' on a $100 laptop. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      ...where quality has been a hallmark, not a thing to avoid.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  11. I still think $10 would be possible. by StreetStealth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if this story began as a typo, I don't think a $10 laptop is a pie in the sky.

    The key here is to rethink our expectations for a laptop versus what the developing world actually needs. The OLPC, for example, is a beautiful machine, but its capabilities are honestly far beyond a baseline which would still make a huge impact on schoolkids living in poverty.

    Imagine something like the following:

    - Reflective, passive-matrix black and white screen

    - Low-end (ARM9-based?) system on a chip

    - 256 meg flash-based hard drive

    - Custom, miniscule Linux distro consisting mostly of a web browser

    - Big, old-style NiCd batteries

    - 1995-style trackball

    - Wired network adapter; USB host with optional wi-fi addon

    With some creative engineering, I could imagine this sort of system getting down to the $tens, and with the kind of mass production you'd need to get this to many millions of kids, I think an ultimate $10 pricetag is completely doable.

    Of course, I'm not actually a product engineer, so perhaps a real one could tighten up my specs (or dash my unrealistic idealism on the rocks).

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    1. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by lee1026 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      doubtful. Typically, stuff don't much cheaper when you get much below the mainstream stuff.

    2. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by oldhack · · Score: 1

      I'd believe it if China can do it. If anyone can cook up super cheap electronic, it'll be them. India doesn't have the manufacturing expertise.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    3. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Wired's "Free" issue a while back was talking how laptop's could easily be free, in the way that a $200 cell phone is free by tying it to a contract.

      In the US a few years back, Microsoft gave you $400 if you signed up for a three-year MSN contract.

      $400 can buy a cheap laptop.

      So a free laptop is just one marketing promotion away.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    4. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by nbert · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm neither a product engineer, but I highly doubt that there is any way to produce anything resembling a laptop below around $90. Just add up the cost for raw materials and then think about the per unit cost of manufacturing the final good. For example look at CPUs: Regarding energy consumption and engine costs it's not so much difference if you build a high end chip or something very low-level. I'm not saying that they feature the same per-unit cost, but they are pretty close. The big difference is that the high-end chip must pay for all the research put into it. Just in case Intel decided to release 386 again they wouldn't be much cheaper than $30. If that doesn't convince you look at the casing: We are not talking about $1 per unit. It's more likely that you will pay around 3 just for the most basic design.

      And if you are still in doubt: Take a look at the RAM prices. This industry currently has to cope with negative margins in many areas, which means that you are paying less than it costs them to produce it. Still I couldn't find anyone selling 256 megs for less than $5.

      The computer I bought in 1993 might feature a market price below $10, but that doesn't mean that the production costs were anywhere near that line.

    5. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Torvaun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some people are already doing that. Like Royal Bank

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    6. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Bandman · · Score: 2

      I would settle for a $100 ebook reader that I could see in daylight

    7. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Nicad batteries are bad, and involve heavy metals.

      lithium ion/lithium polymer rechargeable are great for 2 reasons. 1. lithium is non toxic to humans 2. lithium is recyclable.

      lithium ion and lithium polymer batteries are going to be everywhere we're going to mass produce the hell out of them, and hopefully people with bother to recycle them, because recycling them doesn't involve getting rid of toxic waste. Lead acid recycling takes mammoth sale deposits that force people to recycle them.

      gameboys never came with rechargeable battery packs until the GBA SP, by then cell phones and laptops had brought Li-ion tech down to affordable prices, if you can run it off a standard sized battery, li-ion is plenty affordable. lithium polymer promises to bring the price down even more. so all is good.

    8. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      So a free laptop is just one marketing promotion away.

      The "free" laptop is already here. As you suggest it's a marketing promotion and you have to spend a lot of money to get your "free" laptop.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    9. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      You're confused. You gave me an informative link, and I'm all out of pithy comments.

      However, I just tried putting this in my signature, but it was sadly truncated.

      -------
      In Soviet Russia, our new naked Natalie Portman and grits-powered Linux overlords welcome you, for one. To which CmdrTaco replied, "you must be new here." I didn't RTFA, but I heard that CmdrTaco is just a Twitter sock-puppet. ??? Profit!

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    10. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Here's two estimated cost breakdowns of the iPhone for comparison. $10 is way out of touch.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    11. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the production cost of recent techs are not very different from the production cost of older techs. The price difference is usually due to R&D costs

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    12. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1
      I agree with much of what you say, including the assertion that although an old laptop may only be worth (say) $10 secondhand, you wouldn't be able to manufacture it for that price.

      However...

      Just in case Intel decided to release 386 again they wouldn't be much cheaper than $30.

      You might be surprised to know that Intel was still selling versions of the 386 until last year- as embedded systems. I don't know how much they charged for it, but although issues may be complicated by those chips (probably) integrating other functionality, I'd still expect them to be able to sell something like that for under $30.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by nbert · · Score: 1

      We both don't know. I'd argue that those might have remained in stock for a decade, so they were just selling discontinued items. Plus I know some of them are used in the aerospace industry and they might cost even more than what was paid when they originally were introduced.

      Give me some numbers and I'll just shut up :)

    14. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by zullnero · · Score: 1

      They've tried and still couldn't get down to 100 bucks. It's not as easy as you'd think. People seem to forget all the money spent in labor, quality control, setbacks due to your primary source of computer components, aka, backs of freight trucks...

    15. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      sorry chief but it's going to cost more than $10 to ship it, so your sunk right away.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    16. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A solar powered pocket calculator can be bought online for £1.47.

      Step up from there. Some more keys, a character matrix display, an arm SOC.

      I bet it could be done for around £18. At least enough for a bash prompt.

      I'd buy one. Especially with a solar panel.

    17. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by kesuki · · Score: 3, Informative

      "I'm neither a product engineer, but I highly doubt that there is any way to produce anything resembling a laptop below around $90."

      yeah there is. first off, you're ignoring one important thing. a computer really only needs an 8-bit processor. 8-bit processors use very low amounts of ram, because of their word length. 64k is often the total ram of a powerful 8-bit microprocessor.

      zilog processors can sell for as little as $1. you said there is no way no how a processor can cost $1, yet basic 8-bit zilog processors cost as little as $1 and for that you get a healthy 20 mhz, over 5 times faster than the colecovision adam home computer (z-80 at 3.8 mhz).

      they even sell a 50-mhz 8 bit processor, but 20 mhz is plenty fast.

      i don't know about intel or motorolla, but zilog still sells a wide line of 8-bit 16-bit and 32-bit microprocessors, including a low power Zilog that can run on as little as 2 volts. if that's not enough for you they sell an 8-bit chip with tcp/ip that can generate http web pages, eg: for web control interfaces for a microcomputer..

      "eZ80® is revolutionizing the high-performance microprocessor market for today's 8-bit embedded applications. The eZ80® can operate at speeds up to 50MHz and address 16MB without a Memory Management Unit. This family supports demanding TCP/IP networking applications, featuring an Embedded Internet protocol stack that enables the transmission of HTML form data and the dynamic generation of web pages, and supports additional higher-level networking functions such as email and SNMP."

      i don't know what an ez80 chip costs, but your 'everything must cost $30' assumption assumes a lot of things. how would an 'electronic controlled' thermostat cost $30 if the microprocessor couldn't be reduced below $30? the simple fact is, yeah it can be, and you don't need to make a zilog on 45 nanometer dies to get great price/performance ratios..

      also, the Z-80 product line is virtually unchanged since the 1970's

      that makes implementing z-80 products extremely cheap, since you don't have to design new code if you already have access to old code that was designed for z-80s.

      and before you say 'but you could never get windows on an 8-bit cpu' remember that the NES was a z-80 derived product. you can have a simple, streamlined 8-bit OS and gui, that works just fine without all the HZ, and does just what you need... you could get a $10 laptop, if you really were willing to restrict it to all 8-bit software and the inherent limitations.

    18. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Just in case Intel decided to release 386 again they wouldn't be much cheaper than $30.

      Bull. In Denmark I'm able to get a 1.6 GHz AMD Sempron for 29 US$ INCLUDING a 25% sales tax. And that thing will blow your 80386 out of the water on any kind of computing power. And this is retail pricing buying one cpu at a time from a store.

      Cheapest 256 MB RAM block is DDR2 at 7 dollars (again, including 25% sales tax).

      This brings us to a total cost of 36 US dollars for the CPU and memory - at retail prices.

      But you know, I remember running my Pentium 2 with 128 MB RAM just fine, which would only set us back 5.23 US$ for a Kingston DDR memory block. 4US$ if you are willing to settle for a no-name brand.

      Seriously, if we had OS' that worked fine back when we had Pentium 2s with 128 MB RAM, we should be able to manage with a 1.6 GHz Sempron with 128 MB RAM today.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    19. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by beav007 · · Score: 1

      42

    20. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      This is what I have been saying since I heard the original outrageous price of $100 for the OLPC. I even went to the trouble of looking up what I could build a portable, hand crank computer for using one off retail pricing, and I came up with something like $70. I wasn't even going bottom of the barrel. I started with a C-64 in joystick. added a black and white battery operated camping TV, a keyboard, and a hand crank generator for recharging the batteries. If I could put together a rugged portable battery/hand crank powered portable computer for $70 bucks, there is no excuse for the OLPC's outrageous price, given their claimed goal. Or should I say their vague hand waiving of having a goal.

      8-bit computers were plenty powerful enough to run businesses off of here in the US for a very long time. I'm not buying that third world countries have greater computing needs that 80's US businesses.

    21. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by nbert · · Score: 1

      You are picking on the wrong guy. First of all Denmark isn't that expensive as it used to be. There might be a 25% VAT, but even at that prices you won't hit the gross $10 mark for the CPU *alone*, which proves the point that it will be really hard to build a laptop for $10. .

      You are comparing the price of a current 2.6 Sempron with something which was build almost two decades ago - just because the chips back then did less for the same buck doesn't mean that they were cheaper to produce.
      However, I agree on your last statement. It is a miracle to me how the DE managed to surpass Moore's law,

    22. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      I wasn't arguing against the $10 laptop, I was arguing against his idea that the only cheap cpu would be a 386 costing $30, which is provably wrong.

      And I'm just using Denmark because it's the only place I know of that has a decent website for comparing hardware prices across a multitude of vendors. That way I'm not forced to advertice for say NewEgg for a product that could possibly be cheaper with a lot of other vendors

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    23. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      ... you could get a $10 laptop, if you really were willing to restrict it to all 8-bit software and the inherent limitations.

      So you've got a $1 CPU. Where are you going to get a laptop-sized (readable) flat screen, plus the control module(s) and even a minimal GPU, for less than the remaining $9? Not to mention a keyboard, pointing device, wired or (preferably) wireless NIC, case, and assorted essential glue hardware?

      $100, sure. Maybe even $50, given bulk pricing. But $10? As you yourself pointed out, an electronic thermostat costs more than that, and it doesn't even have a laptop-style display or a QWERTY keyboard.

      Software would be an issue as well. It requires a much more specialized skill set to code anything worthwhile for a 50MHz 8-bit CPU than for even a low-end PowerPC or XScale processor. You'd probably be much better off spending a few extra dollars per unit, if only for the sake of encouraging more third-party developers to write software for your platform. Even a free laptop is little more than a paperweight without decent applications.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    24. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but $30 thermostats are WAY overpriced for what they do. I suspect that has more to do with the UL stamp racket and volume issues than an inherent cost of the device.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    25. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      In fact, they are cheaper to produce though. If you take the original designs and scale them to 45 nm, they require a lot less silicon.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    26. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Wired's "Free" issue a while back was talking how laptop's could easily be free, in the way that a $200 cell phone is free by tying it to a contract.

      So free as in not really free, more like rent-to-own (do those scams^H schemes still exist?) or hire purchase?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Those things you list are mostly cheap because they're old and/or you can get them second hand. To make them new might cost as much or more as the modern tech that replaced them. It might not even be possible if they've junked the jigs, dies, plans etc.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by rwiggers · · Score: 1

      An ARM9 + memory would alone go over $10 in volume. I'm talking about the lowest cost ARM9 I know of and the smallest memories I could find for a recent project, 8MB RAM and 256MB NAND FLASH. A trackball would cost more than touch-screen. In the end, it would look like a cell phone...

    29. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you rented it, they'd ask for the phone back and you could just leave. However you purchase the item. No one else claims to own it. You however must carry a service contract.

      You ask if those "scams" still exist, and I point to the entire cell phone industry.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    30. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Just in case Intel decided to release 386 again they wouldn't be much cheaper than $30

      $30 sounds very high for a 386, since you can buy 16-bit microcontroller for under a dollar. The cost of producing a CPU goes up much more than linearly with the die size.

      Imagine you design a very complex CPU that is exactly a quarter of the size of a wafer. Unfortunately, wafers are round, so you can only fit one on the wafer - three quarters of each wafer are wasted. Now you get an impurity somewhere in the wafer. If it's in your chip, you've just wasted an entire wafer.

      Now, imagine you simplify the design a bit and it only takes up an eighth of the area of a wafer. Now you can squeeze four on a wafer easily. Now you are wasting half of the wafer - you get a maximum of four chips instead of one from each wafer. Next, you get a defect. For a single defect, you only lose one core (unless you're really unlucky and it's on the line between two).

      Now scale this up more. Each time you reduce the core size, you reduce the amount of wasted space on the wafer (and since wafers have a roughly fixed cost, you reduce the per-transistor cost) and you reduce the percentage yield cost of each defect in the wafer.

      I only found one quote for ARM chips, which was for an ARM6 core with the (brand new at the time) Jazelle extensions for $14 in lots of 1,000. I wouldn't be surprised if you can get that down closer to $2-3 in bigger lots now. ARM cores intended for use as microcontrollers cost even less than this.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    31. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true. But then you would want an OS. Lets just use one of the freedos guys out there. You would need at least a couple of hundred meg of flash to make it usefull. You could go with less but it doesnt save you much. You then need a controler for that flash. You probably can get away with no mmu controler for the cpu and ram if you go with one of those SoC types.

      I think a 100 dollar computer is doable but we end up with a mid 80s type computer. While was awsome back then is not so usable now 'for the masses'. Going back to command line type applications people are not going to like. So you will need a GUI.

      THEN given that you are using an 8/16 bit computer means many of the recent open source applications are fairly useless. Such as openoffice, java, and firefox. So those things would need to be either converted, and or replaced. So you might be able to get away with using some 90s applications on that. But those probably still cost a bit. If I owned an application like that I would charge decently for it as I would have to hire people who could fix things in it. If I could find anyone willing to work with TurboC, TurboPascal, or one of the other dozen ancient compilers out there, IF I still have the stuff backed up at all.

      Then do you want the thing to be semi rugged? Remember 10 dollars to a poor person is a LOT, so durable is much higher on the list. So 1-2 dollars for the case is out of the question. Just in connectors alone you could spend 2-5 bucks...

      It will end up in the 150-250 range. It just is not possible right now for it to be less have those nice features and be a 'more modern' os. If you go with a less modern CPU then you probably can get it under 100 but then your apps are all custom or so old the companies that made them are long gone. You will find very few where it is open sourced or they dont care.

      Now lets say it costs me 250k just to make 1 application. That cost is because you will be working with embedded systems guys, they are the only ones left who are willing to deal with those older cpus. You would need to sell 250k of the things to make the cost 1 dollar per app.

      Some people think just because it is open source it is free. There are OTHER costs here. Open source is mostly one giant donation project. People make something and are willing to give it away for free. You might get that after the project has been out for awhile and some people get interested in it. But up front you will not have it, so you will have to hire for it.

    32. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      In Denmark I'm able to get a 1.6 GHz AMD Sempron for 29 US$ INCLUDING a 25% sales tax.

      Those kinds of prices are only available because of surplus stock. ie. AMD couldn't possibly have produced that chip for that price, it's just selling below cost because it's already been made, and keeping it for any longer would make it even less valuable on the open market. It's the same reason people can buy food that is perhaps a few days from it's expiration date, nearly for free... that doesn't mean it was that cheap to produce in the first place, it's just an attempt to reduce a loss.

      But this doesn't scale-up. There aren't enough surplus parts to start building a line of systems. In short order, you eat up the cheap surplus stocks of certain hardware, and have to switch to something else, which is more expensive, and probably requires more money modifying the production line than you save using the surplus parts.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    33. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by kabocox · · Score: 1

      and before you say 'but you could never get windows on an 8-bit cpu' remember that the NES was a z-80 derived product. you can have a simple, streamlined 8-bit OS and gui, that works just fine without all the HZ, and does just what you need... you could get a $10 laptop, if you really were willing to restrict it to all 8-bit software and the inherent limitations.

      Forget Windows, I don't think you could get Dos or Linux to run on that though I'd love to be proved wrong. ;) Makes me wonder what actually runs those little Barbie laptops though. (http://www.amazon.com/Oregon-Scientific-BG68-B-Smart-Learning/dp/B000OW4C9Y/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=toys-and-games&qid=1217521448&sr=8-1 $51.21)
      Would you be able to take something like that give the ability to write to a flash drive and you'd have a $50 laptop.

    34. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Where are you going to get a laptop-sized (readable) flat screen, plus the control module(s) and even a minimal GPU, for less than the remaining $9? Not to mention a keyboard, pointing device, wired or (preferably) wireless NIC, case, and assorted essential glue hardware?

      Introducing, the $15 laptop:

      http://www.target.com/Royal-dm7070r-Personal-Organizer/dp/B000PDJ8Q4/sr=1-1/qid=1217520355/ref=sr_1_1/601-6053863-3987344

      Note the 5-line backlit display with "GPU" controller, full Qwerty keyboard, case, and assorted "glue" hardware. Although less visible, be sure to also note the high retail mark-up, extra unnecessary features that could be eliminated to reduce costs (buttons, styling, etc.) and the like.

      A low-end CPU and (substantially) more memory is really all you need to make it a real computer.

      Not to mention a keyboard, pointing device, wired or (preferably) wireless NIC,

      A pointing device is completely unnecessary. It's used with desktops only because better input methods never caught on. I'd look at something like the Links browser for the way keyboard input should properly be handled. Psion's EPOC/Symbian OS and associated applications also showed how very well input can work without requiring a pointer.

      Wired networking is trivial and proven tech... RS-232 controllers cost pennies in bulk, and can provide 2Mbps throughput. Network cabling is basically any two wires you can get your hands on (a pair of screws or clips might be preferable to DB-9 ports). This would be ideal out in the field, where two people want to exchange files. For classrooms, admittedly I don't know of any existing, purpose-built RS-232 hubs/switches, but it would be very simple and very cheap to make. Perhaps a $5 device.

      Wireless wouldn't be quite so off-the-shelf simple, but it could still be quite cheap. Think of something like IrDA, but with 900MHz RF instead of an Ir diode... If you don't want to go the RS-232 route, all you really need for basic (slow) A.M. networking is a single transistor getting a line of binary input from the CPU, and the output line to an antenna. Software could take care of all the other bits like modulation at the proper frequency and CSMA/CD. It would be an RF nightmare, but at such low power I don't think it will pose much problem. For receiving such a single, you'll also need a couple basic components (diode, capacitor, etc.), wired to an interrupt, but that is similarly cheap and fairly trivial.

      It requires a much more specialized skill set to code anything worthwhile for a 50MHz 8-bit CPU than for even a low-end PowerPC or XScale processor.

      Umm, no. Assembler or C on an 8-bit CPU is no more difficult than any other chip. What's confusing you is the fact that there's no IDEs or libraries to make it quick to put a high-level program together. That matters if you want to port Firefox, but not at all if you want to format and display text, do low-level networking, or even play compressed audio.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    35. Re:I still think $10 would be possible. by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Introducing, the $15 laptop: ... Note the 5-line backlit display ...

      I said "laptop-style display". A 5x12 text-only LCD doesn't count. This is (one reason) why the site you linked to called it a "personal organizer" rather than a laptop.

      Assembler or C on an 8-bit CPU is no more difficult than any other chip. What's confusing you is the fact that there's no IDEs or libraries to make it quick to put a high-level program together.

      That's not "confusing" me, it's exactly what I was referring to. My job involves low-level system programming in C and PowerPC assembly, and embedded CPU design (on FPGAs) is something of a hobby of mine; I'm well aware of the requirements. Programming an embedded system with limited resources and no IDEs, standard libraries, or interactive debugging is a far more demanding task than normal PC application programming, and consequently draws on a much smaller (and thus more expensive) supply of skilled labor.

      A pointing device is completely unnecessary. It's used with desktops only because better input methods never caught on.

      Pointing devices are an essential part of any modern, general-purpose computer. For symbolic input a keyboard is sufficient, even preferable, but some tasks demand an analogue input device. Could you imaging anyone choosing to enter screen coordinates via a keyboard to operate a graphics package, for example? Or even CAD? The mouse was invented for a reason, and not just because users don't properly "appreciate" the power of the keyboard. However, I am willing to grant that analogue input is likely to be less useful for a UMPC than for a normal desktop system, and may be omitted in this context.

      As for network support, I was referring to the standard 802.11 protocols (wired and wireless) for compatibility with existing systems, but if you don't mind breaking compatibility please at least use one of the numerous existing point-to-point systems (such as this 2.4GHz Nordic module) rather than inflicting yet another incompatible wireless standard on an unsuspecting world...

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  12. THEY TOOK ER JERBS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (rabble rabble ...)

    1. Re:THEY TOOK ER JERBS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coach Z, is that you?

  13. What's the hold up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to seem dense, but I have wondered for a while why we don't see far more inexpensive laptops ... I'm not exactly talking about a "$100 Laptop" but if you look at how much processing power is available in inexpensive portable devices like the Nintendo DS, PSP, and iPod Touch and how nice the screens are on inexpensive portable DVD players you'd think that someone would be able to manufacture a pretty decent system for web-surfing and word-processing (and what not) at a price that was amazingly affordable.

    In both developing and developed nations a $200 laptop could really change things ...

    1. Re:What's the hold up? by westlake · · Score: 1
      I don't want to seem dense, but I have wondered for a while why we don't see far more inexpensive laptops. you'd think that someone would be able to manufacture a pretty decent system for web-surfing and word-processing (and what not) at a price that was amazingly affordable. a $200 laptop could really change things.
      .

      Firefox needs an Internet connection.

      OpenOffice.org needs a printer. The printer needs ink and the printer needs paper....and so it goes.

      The core market for the PC is inherently middle class - the middle class can always afford something better than entry level - and the retailer sees healthier margins and stronger after-market sales.

      That is why the ratio of OEM Vista to OEM Linux at Walmart.com remains 50 to 1.

      The Compaq Vista Basic desktop PC at Walmart.com starts at $349 with 2 GB RAM. The step-up from the Celeron to the dual core Vista Premium system is $200.

  14. Oh no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I won't be able to afford one.

  15. One in five people have access to the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slightly OT, but certainly pertinent:
    More than one in five human beings have access to the internet .

    Looking good for open sourcing governments.

  16. Dollar vs. by deft · · Score: 1, Informative

    unfortunately that might just be the conversion rate... $10 US dollar to their $1.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:Dollar vs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't they use the Rupee?

    2. Re:Dollar vs. by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      Actually a 10 Rupee laptop would be less than $0.25 The US dollar might have fallen, but it is still worth FAR more than the rupee....

    3. Re:Dollar vs. by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What do you mean? An african or an european rupee?

  17. Phones - The Real Killer App for the 3rd World by StCredZero · · Score: 2, Informative

    If we distributed a whole bunch of OpenMoko phones and a whole bunch (but not necessarily quite as many) OpenMoko development machines, this would accomplish what OLPC was trying to do.

    Mobile Phones and SMS TXT services are already transforming large portions of Africa. Mobile phone infrastructure is a lot faster to set up and a lot less vulnerable to looting than wired infrastructure. It's a lot more scalable than the OLPC mesh networking -- after all the owners are economically motivated to expand it. SMS and mobile is already giving Africans access to networking and financial services that they didn't have before. (Yes, there's SMS banking in Africa now.) Completely open smartphones with completely indigenous developers would fuel innovation and economic growth in a way which is immediately practical, useful, and completely tailored to local needs.

  18. 100$ Laptop by geogob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh I see where this is going...

    Optional accessories:
    - LCD screen : 150$
    - CPU : 100$
    - 512 Mb RAM : 50$
    - Battery : 100$
    - AC Power adapter : 80$
    etc.
    There are things money can't buy, but for laptops accessories, there's mastercard.

    But yeah... I guess the laptop could be 100$ itself.
    Back to the good ol' times where GM sold there cars with "wheels" and "Steering wheel" as an option.

    1. Re:100$ Laptop by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here cars are way better than there cars. In a here car, you get in and then somebody says "We're here". In a there car, you get in and then somebody says "Are we there?".

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:100$ Laptop by consonant · · Score: 1

      What about were-cars?

    3. Re:100$ Laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dollar sign goes BEFORE the amount, dick brain.

  19. $100 is less than OLPC by kesuki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and if they stick with the same technical specifications long enough It will get down to $10.

    I remember before intel was the king of CPUs that there was the Z-80, and by the mid-90's Z-80 embedded systems (like the franklin bookman electronic dictionaries) were selling for around $40, with a hangman cartridge on flash memory.. the big cost, back then was the flash memory, and sadly Franklin moved away from the command line/text interfaces to go with more costly fancier displays, etc. only to go to more simple displays again, and 'text to speech' processors...

    here's the thing though, by the mid 90's the Z-80 microprocessor was so energy efficient that you could literally run it off 2 cr2022 lithium batteries, and while i didn't use the dictionary every day, it took 13 years for my batteries to fail, to be honest though i used it more for hangman than for a dictionary.

    if i used it daily, it would still last a long time, though, especially since it saves where you are in the dictionary so you can turn it off, then when you turn it on again it's in the same place. very easy to use, and nice.

    the reason why i know it's a Z-80 is because i took the dictionary apart to look at it once. they do have cheaper non speaking dictionaries today, as well. http://www.franklin.com/estore/dictionary/TG-450/ like that one (12 language translation! for $40) for whatever reason the language translating models cost the same as the basic english models, and they have a wide array of 'high end' speaking dictionaries, including ones with mp3 playback, and ebook reading features...

    1. Re:$100 is less than OLPC by nbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Two things which might prevent the development you described:

      First of all $40 in the '90's are not $40 as of today.

      Secondly it's not like the manufacturing cost gets cheaper just because time passes. If you start building them the way they used to be you have to take way higher energy and material costs into account (even in China it's not like electricity is so much cheaper that you will make a bargain). You could use newer technology and put them on smaller dies, but that would cost you as well. There is a reason why we don't build very old designs anymore - the benefits of newer designs outreach the cost savings we have from sticking to what we used before...

    2. Re:$100 is less than OLPC by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I they used the same Z80 as the original GameBoy, you get nearly 1024 opcodes. If that seems a bit backward (when looked from a RISC point of view), imagine being able to set or test register bits with only 2 opcodes, without messing around with other registers.

      There was probably other nifty things it could do, but I can't remember as I haven't done GB-Z80 assembly in over a decade.

    3. Re:$100 is less than OLPC by kesuki · · Score: 1

      z-80 chips are still used in electronic devices today.

      http://www.zilog.com/products/businessline.asp?bl=273

      they have a whole line of 8-bit 16-bit and 32-bit chips

      the reason? the cost of a Z-80 is super cheap and low power nowadays, and the Z-80 powered a lot or popular computing devices, from microcomputers, to the NES console. in the embedded space the Z-80 is still great.

      intel might not use it's old chip designs anymore, but the Z-80 is alive and well.

    4. Re:$100 is less than OLPC by lysse · · Score: 1

      Well, there's already a $99 laptop available with a widely used OS, if you're prepared to forgo x86 compatibility and modern specifications (although I bet it'd run RISC OS without too much trouble... hmm, maybe there's an idea there?)

    5. Re:$100 is less than OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny that you brought all that up, I was contracted with Franklin. We helped with dev and support for those odd little devices.

      Its amazing what something you might consider to be absolutely worthless junk, is so important to others. They def have there niche, and it's extremely impressive.

      Have to say, kudos to Franklin.

  20. Re:at what cost though? by quantumplacet · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, I'd almost guarantee that it will have better hardware than my first computer (Apple IIe) and that didn't leave me with less of a willingness to push forward on the internet. Ultimately, I'm just kind of being a dick here, but you do have to remember that what we might consider crappy and slow, they might still consider amazing. Yeah, it sucks when it takes 2 minutes to open a web browser, but if you've never seen the web before it's still great, and if it's your only access to the web it's still worth it.

  21. Cell Phones VS. Cheap laptop by oneal13rru · · Score: 1

    I bring to mind the blackberry. I also bring to mind the fact that miniaturization costs money... And the blackberry is already higher specs then the kids in India need for school. Whats the problem?

    --
    Never disregard the raw power inherent to stupidity... they call it "dumb luck" for a reason...
  22. Offshoring? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    From TFA:
    "A low-cost laptop being developed by the Indian government in tandem with two leading Indian education and research institutions will cost US$100 when available, and not $10 as was earlier stated by the government."

    First it was $10, then "uh oh, spageddios", it's $100... still think offshoring is a sound business investment?

    --
    stuff |
  23. Re:A $10 Laptop? The best slavery can build. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Why? Slave labour works great for us in the first world, why should developing nations have to escew their use?

    --
    It's been a long time.
  24. In 1981... by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

    The first true portable computer, the Osborne 1, sold for $1795. According to The Inflation Calculator, that's $3352.27 in 2007 dollars. It had a 4 mhz CPU, 65 kb ram, a 5 inch monochrome screen and only took single-sided floppies.

    $100, even $500, by comparison is not bad.

    1. Re:In 1981... by michaelleung · · Score: 1

      It would be portable if you could actually use the damn thing on an airplane. It had a frickin handle and required a plug to use, since it had no batteries apart from this huge thing called a battery, but was too heavy to call it a portable, technically. So the first true portable should be Epson HX-20, if you want to get technical. It had a built-in printer and didn't look as heavy (good enough).

  25. Give the guy a break! by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

    This confusion probably just stemmed from a miscommunication. India's Minister of State for Higher Education probably just called his tech center (which was outsourced to some overseas bidder) and couldn't understand the engineer because of the engineer's thick, American accent.

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  26. I'm way past all of you on this by caywen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm already talking about the $1 laptop. Respect my incredible vision.

  27. Even funnier is the fact that I was wrong. by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    Actually, now that I think about it, it would be the other way around. With the US economy tanking, the price in US dollars of the laptop would be going up, not down.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  28. $100 Lap Top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the VIP room lap tops cost $100, the rest of us get the $10 dance.

  29. Took a clue from "Catch 22" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yossarian pulled back from Orr adamantly, gazing with some concern and bewilderment at Mt. Etna instead of Mt. Vesuvius and wondering what they were doing in Sicily instead of Naples as Orr kept entreating him in a tittering, stuttering, concupiscent turmoil to go along with him behind the scheming ten-year-old pimp to his two twelve-year-old virgin sisters who were not really virgins and not really sisters and who were really only twenty-eight.

    1. Re:Took a clue from "Catch 22" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are _two_ chicks, right?

      Tell me it's _two_ chicks ...

  30. Re:at what cost though? by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

    Indeed. In my day, when Netscape only took 45 seconds to open, it was a Christmas miracle.

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  31. Specs leaked - it's the P-P-Powerbook by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have it on good authority that India is in contact with the P-P-Powerbook designers right now for large-scale assembly.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. They used the wrong currency by michaelleung · · Score: 1

    Maybe in Canadian dollars...

  33. Keyboard alone is $15+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just bought a replacement laptop keyboard for my 3 year old Dell - it was $53 shipped. Let's assume I was completely ripped off and paid 3.5x too much. That still puts the keyboard at $15.

    Next, let's suppose that the cheapest B/W TV would provide the video out - it will be a little heavy, but that's around $20.

    CPU, RAM, no battery. Ok, so that's sorta like an 802.11b router (slow is ok) - I've seen them for $20.

    Add that up and you're still at $50 and missing all those little things that make a laptop nice to have.

    Idealism dashed. I won't come out of retirement if you don't quit your day job. Ok?

  34. no by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Problem is that China can't approach quality or reliability unless pushed by the EU or US. When they are pushed, that doesn't always work too well, either.

    What good is something that needs constant service, far from anywhere capable of fixing it?

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  35. Sagging USD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, both figures were correct, but they forgot to publish which day's exchange rate for the rupee to the USD they were using.

  36. Idea by Renraku · · Score: 1

    Ten dollars always sounded way too good to be true. Most likely, it was a napkin calculation that went public.

    Its probably happened to a lot of companies, nothing to be ashamed of.

    Employee A chats with Supervisor A at a bar or company event involving alcohol. Employee A says that he doesn't know why the laptops they bought cost so much, hell, he could put one together for ten dollars! One dollar for the casing and structure, two dollars for the battery and screen, three dollars for the 'innards, and four dollars for shipping and handling! How did these laptops cost us $400USD each?

    Supervisor A, being sneaky, goes to Manager A. Who goes to Higher-Up A. Higher-Ups B and C approve, and get the gears working. Story is picked up and released. Higher-Ups A, B, and C, talk to their engineering department. They are promptly laughed at, between bites of curry.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  37. Price.... by Jager+Dave · · Score: 1

    ....as calculated by the Bush Administration. To upgrade it, you just use one of their handy $870 Sporks to pry the case open.

  38. Re:at what cost though? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Very true. On the other hand, back in the days the content was also less demanding. It is like participating in a 2008 car race with a Ford T. In its days it was great, but conditions have changed. (moderate car analogy...)

  39. oh yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you like a slurpee with your laptop?

    thank you--come again

  40. Re:at what cost though? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Possibly a better car analogy would be giving an Indian family a Model T. Even though it's horrendously out of date, it's probably better than walking in a few situations.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  41. Re:A $10 Laptop? The best slavery can build. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    No it doesn't. Even ignoring the humanitarian reasons, it makes no economic sense. If you have a slave-owning civilisation then you split the population into producers and consumers. In a healthy capitalist society, most people are both producers and consumers, and trade works. Introduce slaves, and you have a large class of people who produce significantly more than they consume, a much smaller group (their owners) who consume more than they produce, and a much larger group who become progressively less able to afford to consume and less able to effectively produce in competition with the non-consumers. The imbalance eventually leads to large numbers of disenfranchised people, and no one being able to sell anything because there is no one with sufficient buying power who is able to afford it. This would have already happened between the US and China if China were not propping up the US dollar while they develop other markets.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  42. Re:A $10 Laptop? The best slavery can build. by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Corporations almost never follow sound economic policies. Falls under "not my problem".

    --
    It's been a long time.
  43. Made in China by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

    Were the $10 ones made in China or the $100? Probably the $10 ones are made in India and $100 in China and the ones that work made not in India or China.

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  44. You are right yet wrong at the same time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Read your post, then look at our economy, then remember Dick Cheney pressuring Congress to overlook Halliburton's record of slavery. Read your post, then look at the middle east (particularly Dhubai and Kuwait) and then remember the Bush administration pressuring Congress to overlook slave labor used by "contractors" working no-bid contracts in the Middle East.

    Now, what is needed to bring about the biblical armageddon that our leaders openly pray for? Think hard and read your Revelations.

    The cattle are being led to the slaughter....

  45. Re:at what cost though? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the other hand, back in the days the content was also less demanding.

    But if there were a few million users out there with no ability to access "web 2.0" content, I presume that market niche would be filled - either by "light" versions of the heavy sites or by new sites. I'd wager that many could just use their mobile sites.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  46. low-end "Back2School" laptops not bad by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I saw one in the $300s from Walmart with 2B core, 180GB disk, wireless, and Home Vista.

  47. Re:at what cost though? by kabocox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Very true. On the other hand, back in the days the content was also less demanding. It is like participating in a 2008 car race with a Ford T. In its days it was great, but conditions have changed. (moderate car analogy...)

    Makes me want to have a model T in every race just for base line comparison purposes. It would be really sad though if that model T won over modern cars though.