Slashdot Mirror


Knights Templar Sue the Pope

pdragon04 writes "According to The Register, "the Knights Templar are demanding that the Vatican give them back their good name and, possibly, billions in assets into the bargain, 700 years after the order was brutally suppressed by a joint venture between the Pope and the King of France..."." I wonder what a holy grail goes for with 700 years of compound interest.

63 of 675 comments (clear)

  1. statute of limitations? by cptnapalm · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm thinking that 700 years might be a bit past the statute of limitations...

    1. Re:statute of limitations? by pitchpipe · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm thinking that 700 years might be a bit past the statute of limitations...

      NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    2. Re:statute of limitations? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Funny

      In France it does. It is 30 years.

      Or the death of the victim, whichever comes first.

      Makes for a much less bloated legal system.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  2. DNS hack! by hansraj · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think the traffic to the register is being redirected to the onion!

  3. Re:No legal standing to sue by neokushan · · Score: 5, Funny

    If that succeeds, I'm going to rename myself "satan" and then sue the Vatican to get them to give me back my good name.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  4. Re:No legal standing to sue by tinkertim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hello! My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father, prepare to settle.

  5. WTF? by rugatero · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this may be the most surreal headline I've seen all year.

    --
    This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
  6. What about the native americans? by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, assuming this suceeds ... can the native americans sue europe for defiling their land, and ruining their culture? I mean, if europe hadn't sent over all those rejects, the native americans would rule the (un)known world...

    Or, maybe they could just sue the USA for making them look silly - I mean, those native headdresses don't look silly to people who are native - just everyone else.

    1. Re:What about the native americans? by Ziest · · Score: 5, Funny

      The English deported their religious fanatics to America and their criminals to Australia. I think we, the Americans, got the short end of the stick on that one. I want to sue the English government for dumping their religious nut jobs here. I'm going to admit videos of the 700 club as evidence of this maleficence.

      --
      Another day closer to redwood heaven
    2. Re:What about the native americans? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you cant prove you are 50% or greater american indian I think you have no case. Only american indians would be able to sue for the illegal dumping.

      Holy shit, if the remaining american indians get wind of this we are all screwed.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:What about the native americans? by nsayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think we, the Americans, got the short end of the stick on that one.

      I'm not so sure about that. I suspect religion was merely a cover for those secretly desiring improved dental hygiene.

      I want to sue the English government for dumping their religious nut jobs here. I'm going to admit videos of the 700 club as evidence of this maleficence.

      Quakers != Baptists. Different breed of nut job.

    4. Re:What about the native americans? by philspear · · Score: 5, Funny

      Okay I got modded troll I can live with that, but still the Europeans didn't send anyone. By most accounts it looks like a voluntary processes regardless of whether the group was well liked back home.

      This is slashdot. No one was upset with the historical inaccuracy, nor the insulting of americans. The troll moderation was for the insinuation that community colleges were for idiots who don't know history.

    5. Re:What about the native americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That explains a lot about Atlanta.

      Especially why when I go through the airport there, I feel like I'm being punished.

    6. Re:What about the native americans? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Funny

      >The troll moderation was for the insinuation that community colleges were for idiots who don't know history.

      Right. Everyone knows that the idiots aren't going to learn any history in a community college. :-)

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    7. Re:What about the native americans? by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Georgia also declared independence on January 19, 1861, but that one didn't work out quite so well.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    8. Re:What about the native americans? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right. Everyone knows that the idiots aren't going to learn any history in a community college. :-)

      Well said - they'd be teaching it!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:What about the native americans? by IrquiM · · Score: 4, Funny

      Psj... Europe was present more than 500 years before Jamestown!

      Best Regards,
      The Norsemen!

      --
      This is blinging
    10. Re:What about the native americans? by bladesjester · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ninety percent of them stayed in Maryland and Virginia.

      That explains a lot...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    11. Re:What about the native americans? by Grandiloquence · · Score: 5, Funny

      After 1718, approximately 60,000 convicts, dubbed "the King's passengers," were sent from England to America. Ninety percent of them stayed in Maryland and Virginia.

      Of course, descendants of those people still live in Maryland and Virginia, but instead of being called "The King's Passengers", they're now known as "The US Government".

    12. Re:What about the native americans? by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 4, Funny

      most of the posters in this are chimps with no education and no spine

      ...as opposed to ad hominem anonymous coward, who is both wise and courageous?

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    13. Re:What about the native americans? by cHiphead · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm just gonna go ahead and end this thread by calling you a nazi.

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    14. Re:What about the native americans? by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      I, insensitive clod that I am, humbly stand corrected.

      May I respectfully add that your complete inabilty to recognise an obvious (though I confess, throwaway and rather cheap) joke could be likened to the finest, first pressing (cold, for mercy's sake) olive oil; and that it harmonises with the purest wine vinegar of your interesting (it would be unique if not for William Shatner) punctuation style to form the salad dressing that is the perfect tribute to the dear departed.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. I propose a deal. by kahei · · Score: 5, Funny

    They go back and *actually* liberate the Holy Land, and *then* the Pope has to pay them all the golden doubloons in Christendom.

    10% bonus doubloons for finding the True Cross. On second thoughts, 10% bonus for each True Cross found.

    Heck, I'll even chip in a squadron of Turcopoles and some Genoese arbalesters.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  8. Re:No legal standing to sue by Smidge207 · · Score: 1, Funny

    You chose...poorly.

    =Smidge=

    --
    Is it just my observation, or is eldavojohn an idiot?
  9. Its all a coverup! by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Liar!! I've seen national treasure 1 AND 2. C'mon, you're just part of the order, trying to keep all of the other rightful heirs from becoming really rich and buying nice cars.

  10. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by kahei · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and that was rabid Catholic-bashing in post 4, still standing by for Christianity-bashing and something about open source.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  11. They have chosen...wisely. by IllGetYouAToe · · Score: 2, Funny

    But, beware: this lawsuit cannot pass beyond the courts of Spain, for it is effing ridiculous.

  12. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and that was rabid Catholic-bashing in post 4, still standing by for Christianity-bashing and something about open source.

    (see sig)

    --
    My work here is dung.
  13. Re:No legal standing to sue by JustKidding · · Score: 4, Funny

    Indeed, this seems like a rather desperate call for attention. Besides, everybody knows that the Dark Templar are far more powerful.

  14. Re:No legal standing to sue by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Funny

    Come back here and I'll bite your leg off!

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  15. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Buddy Christ mods you up

  16. Onion?... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was The Register hijacked by The Onion or something?... Surreal...

  17. If the Holy See doesn't comply. by MRe_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the Holy See doesn't comply, the warrior knights, renowned for liberating the Holy Land, will deploy that most fearsome of weapons: the Holy Hand Grenade offe Antioch.

    May the best Godwin!

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  18. Re:No legal standing to sue by lbmouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hello! My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father, prepare to settle."

    ...for a shrubbery.

  19. All I can say, is ... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ni!

  20. Re:How many Knights Templar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ever since Indy has found the holy grail, the guy has nothing better to do.

  21. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by pitchpipe · · Score: 4, Funny

    [...]still standing by for Christianity-bashing and something about open source.

    YEAH, how come Jesus didn't post the sermon on the mount for all of us to modify and improve upon instead of dictating it like Microsoft would do?

    --
    Look where all this talking got us, baby.
  22. I'm a living Neanderthal by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and I want to sue the whole of Europe for damages.

    --
    No sig today...
  23. Rightful heir of the Knights Templar by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about Sir Roger Moore? He's a Knight, and is famous for playing Simon Templar.

  24. Congratulations! by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Congratulations! You have discovered the secret of Instant +5 Insightful here in our happy community:

    "Blah blah [vapid knee-jerk complaining about vapid knee-jerk complaining and slashdot groupthink] blah blah," followed by a suggestion of patenting it.

  25. Re:No legal standing to sue by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How amateurish! The descendants of those who left came back and took the land from the descendants of those who remained.

    I can troll better than you.

  26. Re:No legal standing to sue by GXTi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pfft, the Orthodox Church already has Archons.

  27. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by mforbes · · Score: 3, Funny

    dont blame just the christians, they simply have a head start on everyone else.

    Oh no you don't! We Jews were here long before those Christians! Err wait, we've already had enough blame laid on us over the years, forget I said that.

    --

    Allegedly real newspaper headline from 1998:
    Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge

  28. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How about some actual rebuttal of his post instead of just calling it "Catholic-bashing", you Xtian retard?

    How about you refrain from out-retarding your parent poster by using the teenybopper word "Xtian"?

  29. Re:Silly by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, I'm all down with the Catholic church coughing up the New World assets as soon as the Islamic world reverts the middle east to the Roman Christian states they were before hand Islamic expansion.

    Let's go further than that! Join the Gondwanaland Reunification Movement!

    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
  30. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by Bearpaw · · Score: 5, Funny

    YEAH, how come Jesus didn't post the sermon on the mount for all of us to modify and improve upon instead of dictating it like Microsoft would do?

    It's pretty obvious that the original source code has been lost, and the current source is a combination of ignorant reverse engineering, clumsy hacks, and viruses.

  31. Re:No legal standing to sue by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Satan plays for the Penguins.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  32. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by mcvos · · Score: 2, Funny

    The funny thing is, the whole debate has been going on for centuries, and causing fractures in the church between those factions who believed that Jesus was poor, and so the church should be, and those who believed that having lots of money is really great.

    You don't understand. Money is evil, therefore the catholic church tries to make sure they have all of it, so regular people won't have to suffer from it.

  33. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

    The middle one is Luke 12:33.

    Would that be AM or PM ?

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  34. Everybody knows Freemasons by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    are the true Knights Templar, and that we have hidden the treasures of the world beneath a highly recognizable public building (no, not that one).

    Claims about us secretly directing the destiny of nations and peoples are greatly exaggerated, though. I've been in fifteen years and still only get to oversee Botswana.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:Everybody knows Freemasons by steveo777 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who controls the British Crown?
      Who keeps the Metric System down?
      We do! We do!
      Who leaves Altantis off the maps?
      Who keeps the Martians under wraps?
      We do! We do!
      Who holds back the electric car?
      Who makes Steve Guttenberg a star?
      We do! We do!
      Who robs cave fish of their sight?
      Who rigs every Oscar night?
      We do! We do!

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  35. Re:If they can liberate Jerusalem by mcvos · · Score: 2, Funny

    And if they can actually bring peace to that region, they deserve all the billions they can get.

  36. Re:No legal standing to sue by kalirion · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'll just be censored as "Hercule" then.

  37. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    I believe your last two citations are incorrect. The last should be 1 John, and was not uttered by Jesus. The middle one is Luke 12:33.

    Great. Before we had spelling Nazis and Grammar Nazis, now it's Bible Nazis.

    Is nothing sacred?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  38. Re:No legal standing to sue by Theoboley · · Score: 1, Funny

    Satan is a fabric! And I don't know how to spell

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  39. Re:No legal standing to sue by swilde23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There should be a "-1 Monty Python and/or Princess Bride" moderation reason...

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
  40. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by kalirion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great. Before we had spelling Nazis and Grammar Nazis, now it's Bible Nazis.

    Is nothing sacred?

    Off hand, I'd say spelling, grammar, and The Bible.

  41. Re:No legal standing to sue by Number6.2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope you're not expecting sympathy...

    --
    "If god did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" --Voltaire
  42. If they win all that cash... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Funny

    The the pope just might have to shit in the woods.

  43. Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Three things: Spelling, grammar, The Bible, and Monty Python quotes.

    I'll come in again.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  44. Re:No legal standing to sue by rudlavibizon · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's pronounced SHATTAN.

  45. Re:No legal standing to sue by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Funny
  46. Re:Body Snatchers by thepotoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will you people stop with the misconceptions? Tinfoil hats protect you from CIA/Alien mind control.

    The thing that protects [me, anyway] from physical harm at the hands of violent fanatics is the four solid walls, concrete floor, and hardwood ceiling of my mother's basement.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase