Slashdot Mirror


Google Has All My Data – How Do I Back It Up?

shadeshope writes "Slowly but surely Google has taken over my computing life. How can I back it up? Bit by bit with their mantra, hip image and brilliant services, Google has gained my trust and all my data. I am doing almost all of my computing in the cloud. Google Reader, Calender, Email, Docs and Notes have become my tools of choice; even to the point where my day book, research notes, etc., are all on Google's servers. It was just so easy, enabling me to effortlessly work from multiple computers, operating systems and locations. I know, I know, this is foolish — all my eggs are firmly in one basket. It has crept up on me. As a long-time computer user and committed pessimist, I have used many schemes over the years to ensure my data is safe. Now I have ceded all control to Google. How can I regain some control and back this all up? Is there a one-touch solution that will take all my data from the various online apps and archive it on my home server?"

55 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. Kill Somebody by LearnToSpell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then the gov't will back it all up for you! Easy.

  2. Easy! by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once you get all your data back, buy a Mac, subscribe to MobileMe and be safe, knowing that all your data is in the safe hands of a single compa...

    Oh wait.

    1. Re:Easy! by Divebus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Idunno, Sergey. Ask Larry what he does.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    2. Re:Easy! by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once you get all your data back, buy a Mac, subscribe to MobileMe and be safe, knowing that all your data is in the safe hands of a single compa...

      You chose a poor example. Pretty much all the Mobile Me services store the data both on Apple's servers and on the local machine, by default.

      I know you meant this as a joke, but your suggestion actually would allow a user to regain control of their data, albeit probably not in the most flexible way.

    3. Re:Easy! by me+at+werk · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's also notMac, which replaces .Mac.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    4. Re:Easy! by mpe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know you meant this as a joke, but your suggestion actually would allow a user to regain control of their data, albeit probably not in the most flexible way.

      It might enable them to regain control of their future data. But they have almost certainly lost control of their current data.
      About the only way of retaining control over your data whilst having a third party store it would be if you encrypt in such a way that that party will never have access to anything other than the cyphertext. Which has the side effect that you can't process that data with web based apps.

    5. Re:Easy! by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah I mean that as a joke (since a lot of people here think Apple is as evil as Google).

      Any sane person using Leopard will also have Time Machine enabled, on an external hard drive, meaning a local and external backup for most people, and three backups for those also using MobileMe.

      You're right, using a Mac as an example was the worst possible choice.

  3. Uh, Google? by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gbackup, of course! Well OK, not yer, but apparently coming soon. If you need it now, um, Google is your friend. And there's more, if you check Google.
    And BTW, web apps != "the cloud".

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:Uh, Google? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And BTW, web apps != "the cloud".

      Huh? Google web apps, at the very least, can be considered "the cloud", unless you are arguing that the term "cloud computing" has no meaning.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:Uh, Google? by pitchpipe · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Slowly but surely [Meth] has taken over my [...] life. How can I [get it back]? Bit by bit with [its seductiveness], hip image and brilliant [highs]. [Meth] has gained my trust and all my [money]. I am doing almost all of my [living] in the cloud. [Meth Labs and narco-traffickers] have become my tools of choice. Even to the point where my [home, business] etc are all [Meth labs].It was just so easy, enabling me to effortlessly work from multiple computers, operating systems and locations. I know, I know, this is foolish -- all my eggs are firmly in one [drug]. It has crept up on me. As a long-time [cocaine] user, and committed pessimist, I have used many [drugs] over the years to ensure my [highs] are safe. Now I have ceded all control to [Meth]. How can I regain some control and back this all up? Is there a one-touch solution that will take [] my [life] from the various [drugs] and [recover] it[]?"

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    3. Re:Uh, Google? by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      unless you are arguing that the term "cloud computing" has no meaning.

      Correct, it's an unnecessary buzzword (is that an oxymoron?) to cover something that's existed since the days of mainframes and dumb terminals. You know, that limiting, ancient paradigm that led to the microcomputer revolution because it sucked so bad? :)

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    4. Re:Uh, Google? by chunk08 · · Score: 5, Informative

      (is that an oxymoron?)

      No, it's needlessly redundant.
      Necessarily redundant is an oxymoron.

      (And so are many people when burnt.)/jokealert

      --
      Do away with our corrupt tax code. Support the Fair Tax
    5. Re:Uh, Google? by SoVeryTired · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're confusing an oxymoron with a tautology.

      --
      Slashdot: news for Apple. Stuff that Apple.
    6. Re:Uh, Google? by Bob+The+Magic+Camel · · Score: 2, Informative

      is that an oxymoron?

      No, it's rhetorical tautology.

      --
      This signature is esoteric
    7. Re:Uh, Google? by couchslug · · Score: 5, Funny

      "How can I regain some control and back this all up?"

      I suggest searching [Meth] for answers!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  4. why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    google's redundancy is legendary. why bother?

    i can see if they maybe canceled a service or somesuch, but that's highly unlikely, especially for their more popular stuff. (spreadsheets, email, pictures)

    i can understand the urge to keep it all local, but with their diversity, it's much more safe in their "cloud" than it would be at my house...

    1. Re:why bother? by corsec67 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That would work, unless Google itself deletes your account or all of your email.

      Backups are meant to cover more than just hard drive failures, otherwise RAID 1/5 would be sufficient.

      Also, if you can't backup your data from Google, you can't switch from Google to anyone else, so you are locked in.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:why bother? by hedwards · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right, and not to mention that time that they had an error and a lot of people really did lose messages.

      Personally, I don't keep anything vital on google services except email. The email gets backed up via imap periodically.

      This works fine for me because I don't usually have items that I'd be upset about losing, most of the things I do have are not sent over email or are easily backed up individually.

    3. Re:why bother? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe a better argument is for company-level control of user information rather than just user-level backups. If an employee deletes all of their e-mail, the company can't comply with document retention requirements. Likewise, deleting a user eliminates all of their data with no backup recourse.

      For e-mail, I imagine what you have to do is migrate service from gmail to positini (google subsidiary) to get the added functionality.

    4. Re:why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, if you can't backup your data from Google, you can't switch from Google to anyone else, so you are locked in.

      Switch!? What is this crazy talk!

  5. * shrugs shoulders * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know ... Google it

  6. Not sure about one-touch... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Informative

    But Google solutions tend to at least support established open standards.

    That is: You can archive your Gmail account via IMAP. You can probably download your Google Calendar appointments as an iCal file. While I'm not sure of the best way to automate it, all of your documents in Google Docs are available in OpenDocument.

    Still, these are all "some assembly required".

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      But Google solutions tend to at least support established open standards.

      That is: You can archive your Gmail account via IMAP.

      You might have to rejigger some of your tags to end up with a folder structure in your IMAP archive
      Otherwise it'll just be all your mail in one folder.

      http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/10/nested-folders-in-gmail.html
       
      /Unless Gmail has changed something since that was written.
      //Personally, I don't consider tags a replacement for folders

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by Daengbo · · Score: 4, Informative
      For Google Docs:
      1. Get the Google Docs:Download Greasemonkey script.
      2. Get DownThemAll! 1.0.3
      3. Profit!

      For Google Calendar:

      1. Find your private iCal link in the settings
      2. Create a cron script to use wget and a timedate stamp.

      or

      1. Install Conduit
      2. Set up a sync

      For GMail:

      1. Use POP or IMAP

      For Picassa:

      1. Install Picassa

      or

      1. Install Conduit
      2. Set up a sync

      For YouTube

      1. Install Conduit
      2. Set up a sync
    3. Re:Not sure about one-touch... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You appear to have linked to yet another Google technology which is used internally, which they've open sourced because they've found it useful.

      It's no more relevant to this discussion than what filesystem they're using. (And, for the record, they rolled their own FS anyway.)

      Remember: I said "support open standards". I didn't say "exclusively uses open standards for everything, including stuff the public was never meant to see."

      Are you running on OpenFirmware? Have you flashed your BIOS with Coreboot?

      No? Then how is Google any worse? I'd call this better -- at least they've given us some source to play with. I still wish Apple would give me the firmware to my fucking keyboard.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  7. Not one solution by vrmlguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thunderbird can back up gmail, and the Zindus extension will back up you address book. Lifehacker had a story in the past month about using wget to backup your del.icio.us bookmarks; I presume it can be adapted to Googlepages and your blog. Finally, if you install Google Gears, a lot of content will be cached on your laptop. I don't know how you'd retrieve it, but at least you'd know where it was.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  8. It's simple! by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny

    File -> "Save As..."

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  9. Back away, slowly... by mnslinky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Use the Google services only where necessary. We've been doing this for a company I've started, but we only put documents and information on Google's services while we need it there. Not only is all our data on our backup server, but we only put data on their servers while it's needed. Visiting customer sites, etc.

    In addition, isn't this the kind of thing that makes laptops so great? Bring it with you! There are tons of sharing apps about for various uses. Use a VPN and sshfs for remote file access. Use iCal/whatever to sync with your google calendar. That sort of thing.

    In short, slowly migrate to a safer solution you're in more control of. You may lose a bit of your convenience, but safe data is worth it, in my opinion.

    1. Re:Back away, slowly... by silanea · · Score: 2

      [...] we only put data on their servers while it's needed. Visiting customer sites, etc. [...]

      I do hope you don't put any sensitive data there, like any kind of customer data? At least at my current employer we'd grill you for good if we found out about something like this. We already have quite a hard time keeping our employees from storing company data anywhere outside approved locations. Contractors are required to sign an agreement that forbids them from doing such a thing under penalty (along with requiring them to encrypt all data they receive from us).

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    2. Re:Back away, slowly... by maestroX · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't appear to be the cautious type, Mr. Fucking Security man.

  10. Re:stupid question by mnslinky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What part of Sarbanes-Oxley requires they backup data that has nothing to do with their finances? I think you don't know what you're talking about. SOx is very much misinterpreted, and you're only continuing the trend.

  11. Cloud Addiction by daveime · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a long-time computer user, and committed pessimist, I'd have hoped you'd think about backups long before you placed all your trust in the cloud.

    This is exactly the model that all clouds will eventually mutate into ... once enough people become dependent on the cloud, they will announce it will become a paid service the following week.

    Your eggs, Google's basket.

    Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!) Erm, you mean you can't detect which it is ???

  12. Ask Slashdot Troll ? by vic-traill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does This 'Ask Slashdot' have the air of a troll to anyone else? It's like the questioner is serving it up so that every Google-hating/privacy-loving/I-told-you-so'er can go *apeshit* on it.

    --
    [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    1. Re:Ask Slashdot Troll ? by Nymz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While /. management might encourage /. editors to troll in order to drive page views and profits, I imagine there are a number of people out there, that one day woke up and realized 'the Google has you Neo'. Not that Google is the only bad guy, or that they must be demonized. But each person or company needs at some point to take some responsibility for themselves. Asking /. readers for a little advice seems reasonable.

  13. Re:why back up by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google does NOT have your backups. They have redundancy in their data storage, but when their servers get the command to delete something, it gets deleted everywhere, permanently!

    See their own faq: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=50208

  14. Re:why back up by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Google has their own backups I am sure.

    What makes you think that they back up the users' data? (Note: users, not customers.)

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  15. Re:stupid question by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Informative

    The only data S-O requires Google to back up is their own financial data. They have no legal obligation whatsoever to the users of their free services. They could delete all of the OP's data right now for any reason or none and he would have no recourse.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  16. Backing up email by betelgeuse68 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Use Outlook and connect to GMAIL through IMAP, then save off your email to a .PST file via the Import/Export tool.

    -M

    1. Re:Backing up email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ewww... Outlook? PST file?! I think you're on the wrong site.

  17. one-touch solution? by Noke · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is there a one-touch solution that will take all my data from the various online apps and archive it on my home server?"

    no.

  18. Easy scripted Backup for Gmail at least by carpediem55 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use http://www.gmail-backup.com/ to backup my gmail accounts. It works with regular gmail and google apps gmail. It has a click and backup view, but I use the cmd line interface to automate a daily backup of all my mail and labels to a folder as .eml files. It also lets you restore to gmail if needed. It has a few quirks, but over all is very useful.

    --
    Sig!
  19. Has anyone asked Google for a restore? by Bazman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I delete something at work, and then six months later think 'whatever happened to that file?', there's a chance it'll be on our backup archive and I can get it back. Or I can roll back to any of the last week's daily backups. Can Google do that? Has anyone tried? Does it keep versions?

    They seem to encourage you to not delete anything, but that doesn't help with undoing several revisions of a document, does it?

    I'm not a big google docs user, so I might have missed this somewhere.

  20. Just a few thoughts... by CaptainTux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, Google did not 'take over' your life or your data. You willingly gave it to them and, now that you find yourself a bit worried about the implications of one company having all of your data, you are trying to paint them as some sort of evil entity that cajoled and nearly forced you to turn over your data to them.

    They didn't.

    Take responsibility for your decision to hand over your data. Just because a service or company is cool and sexy doesn't give them any special powers to make you do anything. Google included.

    Now, as to backing up your data, I'm not sure what the problem is. Google isn't holding your data hostage at all. With the exception of maybe Notes, you can get your data from Google to your local machine pretty easy:

    Email: setup a POP3 client and download all your mail to your machine from GMail.

    Documents: Go to FILE->DOWNLOAD AS and export each document to a file on your hard disk.

    Reader: Spend some time looking at each feeds URL and bring them into a desktop feed reader.

    Calendar: Find a tool (and there are some, I just can't think of the name now) that will allow you to bring Google Calendar data off of the server and into a local app.

    The truth is you are not a slave to Google. You can leave anytime you want. That doesn't mean it's not going to take a little work on your end to do so but, then, why shouldn't it? YOU chose to go 100% with Google (as many of us have including me) and it isn't Googles responsibility to make it super simple for you to up and leave.

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  21. Re:Customer Service? by brian_tanner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My friend tried to get special permission to publish a figure that had a Google Map screenshot in his Ph.D thesis. If you read the T&C on maps you're not technically allowed to publish such things.

    Anyways, the result that he found was that Google doesn't *have* a phone number. Their buildings and offices do, their sales people do, but I can almost guarantee that there is no "getting to a person" for any query you might have from a technical or legal standpoint.

    I guess.. on that note, have you tried posting in the relevant Google groups?

  22. What does Google owe you? by beaststwo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder precisely what promises Google has made and what responsibilities have they disclaimed themselves of? As any business school graduate knows, one of the keys to keeping customers is to make it easy to start with them but tough to leave.

    Does Google owe any level of data integrity and privacy? Do they owe return of user data without claiming rights to use it otherwise? Do they make any promise of data protection and disaster recovery? What due diligence does the use owe in the process?

    As we move to an environment where more and more people simply 'trust" corporations to hold and protect their (potentially personal) data, I fear that we're way ahead of the law in defining the rights and responsibilities of both users and providers. In the absence of law, providers, such as Google, will write naturally terms of use that mostly benefit themselves. Users will simply lose.

    1. Re:What does Google owe you? by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > In the absence of law, providers, such as Google, will write naturally terms of use that
      > mostly benefit themselves.

      Real providers with whom you have a contract are obligated by law to do whatever the contract says they have to do (assuming that you hold up your end by paying the bill). Advertising agencies such as Google that provide free services for promotional purposes have no legal obligations to their "users" whatever. Nor should they.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  23. Conduit or other synchronization software by MrvFD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm personally excepting to Conduit to fulfill my needs in backing up from different sites. Of course synchronizing is different from backing up, but when I have all the data on my local machine I can backup those easily.

    I'm not very keen in using Google or any other services for my calendar, contacts, photos etc. data. If I'll think I'll need on-the-fly syncing, I'll rather just setup a sync server on my home server.

  24. whatelse? by jsim · · Score: 2, Informative
    Mail - Download use POP3 or IMAP

    Documents - Use "offline access for Google Docs"

    Contacts - export to CSV or vCard

    calendar - export it as a private address in ical format (also XML, html)

    blogs - HTTracker

    photos - try picasa

    what else?

  25. Have you checked out Google Gears? by MichaelPenne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google Docs Offline If the 'cloud' explodes, I guess you can open your Docs offline folder with a web browser, and save the documents as OO, HTML, etc. Other folks have posted about using IMAP to get your email, etc.

  26. Tried that. by Fencepost · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now how do I get the prosecutor to return those backups to me?

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  27. several solutions by speedtux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mail and Calendar, you can simply back up by subscribing to them using IMAP/POP and iCal.

    Google Sites, you can kind of backup with wget; just make a copy of the site from a cron job.

    For Google Docs, you can use Gears; it won't be a full backup, but it will have local copies of the most important documents, and you can cut-and-paste out of that in a pinch.

    In the long term, something like Gnome Conduit will probably solve this problem once and for all; until then, one just has to muddle through.

  28. All your data are belong to us by largesnike · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Putting stuff in the cloud sorta worries me as well, which is why I've kept out of it.

    I find that things like Picassa are OK because these are only copies of your digital stuff at home. But even then, your comments, captions and arrangements would, it seems belong to them.

    --
    "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
  29. Re:backup by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 2, Informative

    POP3

  30. Re:why back up by Anpheus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm saying that if that if the Sheriff, well, to be honest, the FBI rolls in, and says, we're taking these backup tapes, then they'll have it. Not deleted.

    But if you roll in and say, hey, I want my old emails, they'll say, sorry, no, we have no way of giving you just your old emails back in a timely manner.

    That said, Google has resisted what it correctly considered to be unlawful demands for information.