Slashdot Mirror


Russia and Georgia Engaged In a Cyberwar

doctorfaustus writes "I first picked this up in bits and pieces last week off Daily Rotation. A more in-depth story is available at ZDNet, which reports 'a week's worth of speculations around Russian Internet forums have finally materialized into a coordinated cyber attack against Georgia's Internet infrastructure. The attacks have already managed to compromise several government web sites, with continuing DDoS attacks against numerous other Georgian government sites, prompting the government to switch to hosting locations to the US, with Georgia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs undertaking a desperate step in order to disseminate real-time information by moving to a Blogspot account.' There is a question whether the computer work is being done by the Russian military or others. ZDNet's story offers further analysis of the attacks themselves and their origins. Some pretty good reporting." And reader redbu11 contributes the news that Georgia seems to be censoring access to all Russian websites, as confirmed by a Georgian looking glass/nslookup tool. The access is blocked on DNS level (Italy censored the Pirate Bay in the same way). Here are a couple of screenshots (in a language other than English) as of Aug 12th 5:40 pm: www.linux.ru nslookup — FAIL, www.cnn.com nslookup — OK.

ComputerWorld guy CWmike adds "In an intriguing cyberalliance, two Estonian computer experts are heading to Georgia to keep the country's networks running amid an intense military confrontation with Russia. Poland has lent space on its president's Web page for Georgia to post updates on its ongoing conflict with Russia. Estonia is also now hosting Georgia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs Web site."

68 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. Poor Atlanta... by polyomninym · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was just too dang hot for them to see it coming.

  2. Propaganda? by PacketShaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am all for freedom of the press... but these two countries are more or less at war right now (whether they should be or not is topic for another discussion).

    It seems perfectly reasonable to me for one country at war with another to stop information flowing in from the enemy to the local populace.

    1. Re:Propaganda? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So it is reasonable for the US to have blocked all Iraqi and Afghan sites during our invasion?

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Propaganda? by PacketShaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see why not (if there was actually a declaration of war, which we will not get into).

      But since we invaded them, I would say it is absolutely reasonable for them to block our sites from their citizens.

    3. Re:Propaganda? by loteck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not sure how this is propaganda? The summary and articles are reporting facts, and it's interesting to consider, since this is some of the first reporting ever done on the subject of an active "cyberfront" of a currently waging (albeit de-escalating) real war.

    4. Re:Propaganda? by gnick · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It seems to me that it depends on the situation. If the war's on our soil, blocking communication with the enemy seems fine. It also seems just fine to block our troops access to our enemies sites when they're on enemy soil. Also, if we're on their soil, blocking access to our sites seems fine. Basically, you want to interfere with orders being issued to a saboteur or similar and make sure that your citizens aren't subjected to foreign propaganda (only domestic propaganda).

      Note that that's a very different thing than launching DDoS attacks on servers that blocks your enemies from accessing their own servers or communicating internally. That may be fine too depending on the situation. If you're disrupting military communications, that's probably OK. If you're blocking civilian access to sites advising them on emergency procedures or preventing them from accessing medical assistance, that's pretty shady.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re:Propaganda? by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It seems perfectly reasonable to me for one country at war with another to stop information flowing in from the enemy to the local populace.

      If one country (Georgia) moves their websites to some other country (the USA) and the aggressor (Russia) continues the cyber attack, is the aggressor committing an act of war against the "other country"?

      If it isn't an act of war, what should the "other country" do about the attack on their infrastructure/website.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Propaganda? by gnick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sorry for the self-reply, but TFS just got more interesting with the computerworld thing.

      Assuming that Russia cyber-bombing Georgia's sites is a valid war-time maneuver, is it also OK for them to do the same thing to the servers in Poland and Estonia that are now hosting the offending sites? If those sites are dangerous enough to be considered targets, can hosting those sites be viewed in the same way as supplying weapons to Russia's enemies? Methinks that we'll see some ugly traffic between Russia and these Estonian and Polish servers (that Russia will of course disavow all knowledge of).

      Of course, the US is hosting too. Surely none of our Communist comrades would ever be brazen enough to launch attacks on servers hosted here? ;o)

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    7. Re:Propaganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe it is. The same way we would consider it an act of war if Russia invaded Turkey and just happened to destroy our military base(s) in Turkey.

      But different from NATO bombing the Chinese embassy in Belgrade?

    8. Re:Propaganda? by Machtyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Something about an errant bomb, a Chinese embassy, and during the wag-the-dog 90's era, seems to put a chill in me. Thank you for reminding me :-/

    9. Re:Propaganda? by penguin_dance · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, that's a nice, logical, disinterested way to look at it. However it IS pertinent in that someday this is going to happen to us. Someone is going to attack on a large, coordinated scale and we had better be more prepared than what we've seen in the recent past. We do have a larger structure. Unless of course they are taking the electrical grids down (a likely target) which would cut off all mass communication in the area along with taking down our economy.

      It should be somewhat alarming to those of us in the US (although, not surprising) that Pootie-Poot is trying to overthrow the leader of a sovereign nation that is pro-Western. We should be concerned that Russians are moving back into their old nation-building ways and back-tracking on freedoms that seemed to be coming to their people. They are not our friends, nor have they been even remotely in several years, if ever. This is one of the countries that was going around the UN embargo of Iraq to supply them with weapons and enriching themselves under the "oil-for-food" debacle.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    10. Re:Propaganda? by dwye · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if a Russian flagged vessel were to dock in a neutral country, like the Ukraine, George would be within its rights to attack that port and destroy it.

      Probably false, and certainly stupid.

      Real Life Examples:

      When a German vessel docked in a neutral port, Buenos Aires, the British could/did demand that Argentina either (1) expel the Graf Spee within 24 hours after immediate danger (from damage received) to the crew had passed, or (2) intern the ship and its crew for the duration. They did NOT attack Argentina, though.

      Only if the neutral port was being used for German military purposes (as they did with Goa) could the port be attacked as a belligerent, and even then the British tried to have plausible deniability and to damage only the German ships, since the Portuguese may not have realized that they were passing signals to local U-boat packs (or wanted to claim that), and you do not want to force them onto the enemy's side.

      Back To Theory:

      In your case, attacking the Ukraine for letting a Russian (especially civilian) ship dock to take on needed supplies, medical assistance, etc., is an Act Of War against Ukraine. Only if Ukraine is obviously letting the Russian military use their ports freely and blocking you is it grounds for war.

      Same thing here. If Poland wants to allow Georgia to use their servers, they shouldn't be surprised if Russia "hacks" those servers with a 2,000 lb bomb.

      Is Poland a full member of NATO, yet? Maybe Russians don't want to invite the Wehrmacht (Bundeswehr, same thing) to attack them, especially for non-military servers, given the damages left the last time. Especially, since this time, the Germans will NOT be classing the other Eastern Europeans as subhuman trash to be reduced to slavery, thus driving them into the Bear's arms. We will leave aside the USA forces, as they will have been busy before the tragic Russian mistake. Afterwards, target priorities may change.

      A DDoS attack against the relocated Georgian servers, OTOH, is just a good idea, especially for the Foreign Ministry one. Killing the Polish sysadms, however, is a bit too extreme for politeness.

  3. Well, that's a relief by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard all this talk about a war between Russia and Georgia and got kind of anxious, but itturns out it's just a cyberwar. The media really should stop sensationalizing these things like that.

    1. Re:Well, that's a relief by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was not started by Russia.

      Rather than getting into the "he did this, oh yeah, well he did this first" thing that will have us talking about Attila the Hun in short order... I'd just like to point out that Russia's latest response was pretty over-the-top.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Well, that's a relief by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Though to be fair, if you go and kick a big, tough, strongman in the shins, you can't complain that he reacted disproportionally, and you're now in hospital.

      Oh, no question there. Georgia was definitely reckless here.

      but then they side with the Georgians against the mainly Russian South Ossestia.

      I'm new to this as well and am still catching up on history. But I think that the Russians are more interested in control than they are in the welfare of 70,000 people in South Ossetia. They stuck their nose into a civil war, and then complain when their "peacekeepers" (who actually seem to run the government) get killed in the process. And then granting South Ossetians Russian citizenship when they are still part of Georgia? Well, that's pretty brazen. Even more brazen is claiming that now "Russians" are being killed in South Ossetia. They have effectively annexed South Ossetia... and now are grabbing even more of Georgia to "protect" it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Well, that's a relief by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly.
      Georgia was stupid enough to think it could invade Russian territory and not get the shit raped out of their little country.

    4. Re:Well, that's a relief by Smauler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Georgia never gave any Russians permission to act as "peacekeepers" in South Ossetia. If there were any armed Russian "peacekeepers" in South Ossetia they were operating illegally within another country's borders.

      Georgia is _entirely_ within its rights to police any province within its borders. None of the allegations of genocide etc have even remotely been substantiated. Russia invaded Georgian territory, that's all there is to it.

      South Ossetia is basically a tiny place, ie nowhere near the size of Kosova. If my town (Colchester, which has about the same population as South Ossetia) had a referendum, we might vote for independence from the UK. We wouldn't get it though.

  4. Direct translation to Battlefield... by deft · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems that Georgian military units are pinging off the map, while russian units are enjoying first shot capability.

    This has allowed the Russians to clear each map easily, with little resistance.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  5. Dupe? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 2, Informative

    I first heard about this by reading an article titled "Evidence of Russian Cyberwarfare Against Georgia". It was posted on this site you might have heard about called /. (or Slashdot).

    --
    GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  6. Re:let it loose! by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Wouldn't it be grey hat hacking?

    A grey hat, in the hacking community, refers to a skilled hacker who sometimes acts legally, sometimes in good will, and sometimes not. They are a hybrid between white and black hat hackers. They usually do not hack for personal gain or have malicious intentions, but may or may not occasionally commit crimes during the course of their technological exploits.

    A black hat hacker would hack the firewall in order to get credit card numbers.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  7. Re:You know what's great about Soviet Georgia? by baldass_newbie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not as many white supremacists morons, either.

    I don't know, dude. This is the Caucasus we're talking about. Lots of Caucasians there.

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
  8. Re:How much more of this until browsers adapt? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's a terrible idea - the phishers would be all over that. Anyone who needs to override DNS should know how to do so themselves - and a IP-based address is useless for long-term use, so you wouldn't be able to use them in stable links either.

  9. Re:You know what's great about Soviet Georgia? by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know, dude. This is the Caucasus [wikipedia.org] we're talking about. Lots of Caucasians there.

    Yah, but they're mostly self-loathing caucasians, as opposed to white supremacists.

  10. a Language other than English by seyyah · · Score: 3, Funny
    That's crack reporting there:

    Here are a couple of screenshots (in a language other than English)

    It's Georgian. In language and alphabet.

  11. Without country by Statecraftsman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cyberwar is global. What's to stop widespread vigilante justice against either side? What's to stop US or Chinese hackers from joining in independently to fight on the side they choose? When does blogspot or the Estonian site become the target?

    1. Re:Without country by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's to stop widespread vigilante justice against either side?

      Hot double agents who promise to aid the hackers in their jihad against perpetual virginity in return for non-interferenece.

  12. NOT CYBER WAR, It's something else... by davidsyes · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've listened to NPR yesterday about this, and the best experts have been able to say so far is that it is cyber VANDALISM. No major infrastructure has been crashed. Hospitals and such have not been imploded.

    There is even speculation that Georgians themselves crashed/trashed their OWN systems to exploit the current bad image Putin (yes, PUTIN is calling the shots, not Medvedev. Moreover, and ironically, a US-based outfit in, guess where... GEORGIA (yes, the state) offered and took on the hosting for the Georgian President's web site. Guess what? It wasn't working out. It was still being crashed/taken down. So, another party (seems to be Estonia) is helping out.

    I really fracking wish some of these sensationalistic headers on Slash would get slashed.

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/talk/2008/08/august_12th_show.html

    Now, given that Putin/Medvedev claim Russian advances are immediately ceasing (purportedly) there really isn't "cyber warfare" going on, isn't there? If things continue, or escalate, THEN it might truly eclipse the bounds into "warfare".

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  13. Re:How much more of this until browsers adapt? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just like we can specify a URL like "http://username:password@www.somewhere.com/" can we come up with a way to specify a given virtualhostname at an IP address (say... "http://www.somesite.com>192.168.1.5/")?

    Just put "192.168.1.5 www.somesite.com" in /etc/hosts, or whatever the Windows equivalent is.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  14. Re:let it loose! by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Define "legally" in a war...

    Seriously, black hat, white hat, grey hat or technicolor hat, it kinda loses meaning when legality itself isn't really applicable anymore.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Re:How much more of this until browsers adapt? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just put "192.168.1.5 www.somesite.com" in /etc/hosts, or whatever the Windows equivalent is.

    It's actually /etc/hosts, believe it or not.

    Well, or something like C:\Windows\System32\etc\hosts. But the format is identical, save for maybe using \r\n instead of \n (and I'm not even sure about that).

    Must be all that BSD code in the Windows IP stack.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  16. Haha, LOL, but not really! by ShieldVV0lf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Georgia: c2c?
    Russia: Yes, I would love to cyber
    Georgia: 2 late lol..just got 3 msgs
    Russia: Die
    Georgia: ?
    Russia: I winnuke you
    Georgia: OH *@#@)(! I am still running win95!

  17. Re:How much more of this until browsers adapt? by scalarscience · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually it's Windows\System32\drivers\etc (the file is hosts without any extension). On Vista UAC may block your access to the file by default as well, the easiest way to get around this (aside from disabling UAC altogether) is to run your editor with elevated privileges.

  18. I didn't know Georgia had computers by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh wait, you meant the other Georgia.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  19. In Soviet Russia... by scubamage · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...service denies you!

  20. Censoring access? I think not. by arcade · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the claim that Georgia is censoring traffic is probably misleading.

    What's happening is that they've got incoming DoS-attacks, and have probably nullrouted quite a few russian IP-ranges. This probably includes quite a few DNS servers, making DNS lookups fail.

    I haven't taken the time to _check_ any of this, but if you nullroute the DNS servers, of course DNS lookups will fail. If you're under a DoS, of course you nullroute quite a lot.

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
  21. Re:let it loose! by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it's safe to say they are black hats- they're deliberately, maliciously attacking other networks. The distinguishing feature isn't legality, it's the goal of the attacker.

    Grey hats generally disregard the laws but don't want to cause harm. Black hats steal credit card numbers, deface servers, and generally bork things up. White hats do the same as black hats, but with the end goal of hardening systems.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  22. Re:Uh? People? by Bryansix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, people just don't understand. The Internet is not down there. The packets get routed. It's the web servers that are being vandalized. The actual servers that host the actual content the Internet delivers. Hence, Garbage in, Garbage out.

  23. Re:let it loose! by Namlak · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know you've arrived when your hat's gone to plaid.

  24. Re:let it loose! by DriedClexler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Define "legally" in a war... when legality itself isn't really applicable anymore.

    Now that's just a bit too cynical. War itself involves a lot of actions where the combantants will disagree about legality, but it is meaningful to call some of them "illegal" as a bystander.

    For example, if a Georgian troop goes into Russia and kills a Russian troop by firing at him with a rifle, Russia would certainly love to characterize that as "murdering" (i.e. illegal killing of) a Russian citizen. But it's not (in and of itself) a "war crime".

    There exist widely respected protocols for what a well-intentioned nation can do to conduct a war, such as the Geneva Conventions and U.N. mandates. They never ban ALL killing of people, and for good reason: if it were to say, "to conduct a just war, you must kill no one", then no nation would respect the authority of that enumeration of norms, and they'd just go back to whatever they were doing before, which could include targeting of civilians, torture, disguising as aid workers, etc.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  25. Re:let it loose! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Define "legally" in a war...

    See Conventions, Geneva.

  26. Re:let it loose! by beckerist · · Score: 5, Funny

    hmm...Russia....RED hat hackers?!? ehh? ehhh?? get it?!

  27. Teh Googles by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Speaking of cyberwar... So, I google mapped Georgia (I'm reasonably good about knowing geography... but come on, Georgia? Sorry Georgians...) Anyway... I was rather disappointed to find that... there's nothing there. Really odd. Roads end, obvious cities aren't even labeled as cities. It's not like Google did a cursory mapping of it and skipped parts... it's just that aside from the border and the country name it doesn't exist. Also... good luck finding it by typing "Georgia" in google maps. The country isn't even an option. I had to wander through eastern Europe until I got over by Turkey before I saw it.

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  28. Hear from the security team defending the website by unity100 · · Score: 4, Informative

    here : http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=714632 these are the people working at that atlanta web host, hosting georgian president's site from russian bastardiness. they havent had enough sleep in the few days but they made a fight of principle out of it.

  29. Re:let it loose! by Kozz · · Score: 3, Funny

    hmm...Russia....RED hat hackers?!? ehh? ehhh?? get it?!

    So... red hats... a bunch of old ladies?

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  30. Re:let it loose! by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nope, just a paid for version of Fedora http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RHEL

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  31. Re:let it loose! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't "causing harm" the idea behind a war? I mean, if I don't want to hurt you, your country, your economy, why bother going to war in the first place? So I can shoot people legally?

    So is the attacking hacker a "black hat" and the defending hacker a "white hat"? I guess Russia would disagree.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. Re:let it loose! by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You mean the stuff you'll be tried for in Den Hague when you break it, unless you have bigger guns than the rest of the planet so they don't dare to pull you to the court?

    Yeah, I'm sure Russia is afraid of that.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Re:You know what's great about Soviet Georgia? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    I don't know, dude. This is the Caucasus [wikipedia.org] we're talking about. Lots of Caucasians there.

    Yah, but they're mostly self-loathing caucasians, as opposed to white supremacists.

    You think white supremacists don't loathe themselves? I always figured those who have to denigrate others to feel better about themselves must have a pretty low opinion of themselves to start with.

  34. Isn't this an act of war against the U.S? by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A foreign power is using illegally obtained U.S. resources (compromised PCs) to attack another power. I believe that is a serious breach of international law. It would be no different t

    --
    meh
  35. Re:How much more of this until browsers adapt? by Ghubi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at here. If you know the IP address you're trying to reach, you can just type the IP into the address bar.

  36. Re:let it loose! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need a "hat colour" for a war hacker. This will become a lot more common in the information age.

    Any takes on a good colour?

    Digital Camo of course. Sheesh, what's your excuse? Your UID isn't THAT high.

  37. CyberWar Weapon by rafaelolg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why don't russian just link some Georgia's site in slashdot? The chances of service survival after a slashdot rampage are minimal.

  38. nope, I think it can be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are 'asshat' hackers.

    Russia behaves like an organized crime gang on a superpower scale. There is little mercy or love left in the Russian soul.

    That being said, Georgia made a serious, serious blunder when it attacked the Ossetien separatists.

  39. Re:You know what's great about Soviet Georgia? by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not as many niggers as US Georgia.

    In Soviet Georgia, Blacks lynch you.

    Yes, you specifically.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  40. Re:You know what's great about Soviet Georgia? by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Russians, Georgians, and Niggers are all sub-human."

    History of the Internet, Chapter 5: David Duke gets his first email address, Slashdot account.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  41. Re:let it loose! by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Define "legally" in a war...

    Seriously, black hat, white hat, grey hat or technicolor hat, it kinda loses meaning when legality itself isn't really applicable anymore.

    When I was a kid, my best friend's dad was a WW II Navy vet, one that saw a lot. He scoffed at the very notion of "rules of war".

    As he put it, "If I have an 'illegal' weapon, and an enemy is trying to kill me... guess what... I'm using the illegal weapon".

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  42. Well, it was NOT Russian territory by coder111 · · Score: 2, Informative

    South Ossetia is a Georgian province. Population there is NOT Russian, but they were given Russian passports around the time when Georgia split off from Soviet Union. The region was mostly governed by Russians, and they supported it with weapons and fueled separatist movement there. And there were provocations from Russian/Ossetian side before Georgia invaded last Friday. See August 1-7 buildup on Wikipedia article. Same thing with Abkhazia. Russian occupation and annexation of Abkhazia was completely unwarranted and unprovoked- Georgia did nothing to Abkhazia.

    In general, this is just a part of The Great Game. Divide your enemies, make Abkhazians, Ossetians, Georgians hate each other and fight each other, and rule them all. But I still think that Russia provoked this war, and they were preparing for this war long time before Georgian strike on Friday. Russia has been meddling and fighting in Caucasus for hundreds of years now. They have been meddling with other neighboring countries as well. And if the world doesn't stand up to their bullying, this will make Russia feel invincible and beyond punishment. I wonder who would suffer next. Ukraine? Baltic states? Poland? Chechnya is still occupied, and genocide there is still ongoing. Russia never cared and will never care for lives of people, their own citizens or not, nor for peace.

    And don't get me started on peacekeepers. Russia having "peacekeepers" in Ossetia is similar to Nazi Germany having peacekeepers in Poland.

    --Coder

  43. Re:let it loose! by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I humbly propose a new term for hackers who engage in warfare: "steel hat".

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  44. Re:let it loose! by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To quote my army trainer, rules of engagement exist for Generals and other cushion-poopers who don't have to worry about bigger problems. Like, for example, bullets.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  45. Re:Hear from the security team defending the websi by Kesha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why are you calling Russians bastards?

    On the night of August 7th/8th, Saakashvili launched an operation to "restore constitutional order" in South Ossetia. He started by bombing the crap out of Tskhinvali using Grad rocket launchers, resulting in hundreds of dead Ossetian civilians (1500 according to Ossetian and Russian numbers). Why wasn't there an outcry over their deaths in the western media? Whenever the Ossetian death toll was called it was qualified as unconfirmed. However, when a Russian plane missed a military target on August 9th and 5 Georgian civilians died in Gori it was all over the news.

    Perhaps it's best to avoid name calling, and re-evaluate the reasoning behind your prejudiced attitude towards Russians. They aren't the bad guys every time you know.

  46. Re:Many people do not realize:Georgia started the by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Georgia attacked separatists and criminals within their own borders. Yes, it was a stupid move, but all that different from Russia attacking Chechyneyan rebels and criminals within its own borders.

    Granted, there were a lot of soldiers there as "peacekeepers", and a lot of people who had been given Russian passports (not really Russian citizens). It was a stupid move of Georgia to start a crackdown on the separatists when it was obvious it was in a precarious situation. Don't poke the bear in the eye if you want to keep your finger.

    But the Russian response was amazingly out of proportion. Tanks crossed into a sovereign country, beyond even the disputed South Ossetia region in question, without any delay for negotiations or even an hour or two of threatening postures. This is not like US invading Iraq after months of rhetoric and misinformation to the UN and a small bit of planning.

    Of course there was a cyber war. Russia tried it against Estonia. I don't think the government itself was behind it, as it's an ultimately futile gesture. But the government certainly took no action to find or punish whoever was behind the cyber attacks there. Probably better to wink at the script kiddies aimed against outside countries than to have them focus on targets at home.

  47. Re:over the top? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The US has been "advising" the Georgians until a few weeks ago, last month they had a thousand guys there "training".

    You know what the US was advising Georgia? Not to pick a fight that they can't win with Russia.

    just shelling the city hard, but they couldn't take it

    They actually did take it, which is why the Russians rolled in.

    So what is over the top about fighting back if you get attacked,

    Russia was not directly attacked. Some of their "peacekeepers" who were occupying part of Georgia were killed during the blitz. Now here's where the finger-pointing starts.

    How about if it was your relatives that got wasted by the Georgians being "advised" by the US?

    That depends... am I pro-Georgian or pro-Russian? I could probably find a way to blame this on the separatists or the Georgians depending on my stance.

    There is no such thing as a "fair fight" in war, you fight to win, period.

    I'm all for that, but... why are the Russians in this fight? It's not their fight - they have actually worked very hard to keep international peacekeepers out. I say it is ulterior motives.

    The US not only invaded a nation and took it over that had a peripheral involvement in the 9-11 attacks that killed 3,000 people, they went ahead and attacked and took over another nation that had absolutely nothing to do with it and have killed who knows how many people, many thousands, figures vary wildly, based on lying about the involvement.

    Two points. One, the actions of the US have no bearing on whether what Russia did is right or not. Second, Russia has managed to de-facto annex part of Georgia, even giving Georgians Russian citizenship. Iraqis and Afghans do not get US passports, and the US has no intention of running either country.

    , the US and the Georgians screwed up bad

    The US advised Georgia NOT to provoke the Russians. But I agree that Georgia screwed up. That said, while the Russian response was to be expected, it was still way over-blown.

    Of course they are desperately trying some fast quick lies in the press like they always do

    Both sides are guilty of this. Russia was claiming that "their citizens" had been killed, which is garbage - and there was no end to Georgia's exaggerations either.

    absolute dullest of the stupid and the fanatical flag wavers

    Both countries have no shortage of those people.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  48. Poor Georgia...living under the Russian boot... by reporter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Despite the tone of the preceding comments, the conflict between Georgia and Russia is deadly serious. Please read "Vladimir Bonaparte" by the full editorial board of the "Wall Street Journal" (WSJ).

    The WSJ editorial board wrote, "No matter who fired the first shot last week in the breakaway Georgian region of South Ossetia, Moscow is using the separatist issue as an excuse to demolish Georgia's military and, if possible, depose its democratically elected government. Russian forces moved ever deeper into Georgia proper Monday. They launched a second front in the west from another breakaway province, Abkhazia, and took the central city of Gori, which lies 40 miles from the Georgian capital of Tbilisi. These moves slice the country in half and isolate its ports, most of which Russia has bombed or blockaded. Moscow dismissed a cease-fire drawn up by European nations and signed by Georgia.

    Russian bombers have also hit residential and industrial areas, making a mockery of Moscow's charge that Georgia is the party indiscriminately killing civilians. Russian claims of Georgian ethnic cleansing now look like well-rehearsed propaganda lines to justify a well-prepared invasion. Thousands of soldiers and hundreds of tanks, ships and warplanes were waiting for Mr. Putin's command."

    1. Re:Poor Georgia...living under the Russian boot... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      Russian troops have since then retreated from Georgian controlled territory back into Ossetia and Abkhazia. It seems that we have a ceasefire in effect now, for some time at least.

    2. Re:Poor Georgia...living under the Russian boot... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      Russian troops have since then retreated from Georgian controlled territory back into Ossetia and Abkhazia. It seems that we have a ceasefire in effect now, for some time at least.

      *sigh* You can mod my parent post down as "-1, Wrong Guess", it seems. We broke the ceasefire once again.

  49. Re:You know what's great about Soviet Georgia? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because the USSR spent 70 years building a large economy out of those little states, and they moved a lot of people around to keep the piece. Then the 1990's hit, the wall fell and the USSR was carved up into little ethnic groups while NATO held a gun to Russia's head. Now that the US is over-committed it's a good time for Putin to grab some home points and get some wayward "states" back.

  50. Re:let it loose! by Atario · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Define "legally" in a war...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crime

    Clearly, the US ignoring this concept has been going on long enough that people are returning to the Bad Old Days when "there's a war on" meant "we can commit any atrocity we want, fuck you".

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  51. Slashdotted by isorox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, the preseident's site seems to be down now, I guess they could handle the attacks, but not slashdot. I wonder if Slashdot should be considered a WMD?