Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Firms Get Behind OpenMoko/FreeRunner

mario writes "Now that the OpenMoko platform has stabilized enough to provide the OM2008 image (supporting the three major toolkits), things are starting to heat up. Linuxdevices is reporting on the start of a port of Devicescape's connect application. Koolu (another Canadian company) is also doing development for its W.E. phone (a branded FreeRunner). Which leads me to ask: Where are the American companies?"

140 comments

  1. "Where are the American companies?" by dattaway · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Investing their money in Washington crafting laws and developing new business models.

    1. Re:"Where are the American companies?" by r0b!n · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't you mean "Investing their money in Washington crafting laws to protect irrelevant business models".

    2. Re:"Where are the American companies?" by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Please, please, Aggressively monetizing their Leveraged IP in the Consumer Space...

    3. Re:"Where are the American companies?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last time I checked the map Canada was a country on the American continent. In North America, right next to the USA, to be more precise... but what do I know.

    4. Re:"Where are the American companies?" by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 1

      Is a sovereignty thing. Canadians generally don't recognize themselves as American, and hey, can you blame them?

      --
      try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
    5. Re:"Where are the American companies?" by Tanktalus · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's also called "denial." :-P

    6. Re:"Where are the American companies?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North, Central, and South America are "The Americas". There is more than just one American continent. In a manner of speaking, Che Guevera and Fidel Castro are both Americans as well.

  2. Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can we talk about the iPhone 3G instead?

    1. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ted Rogers is that you?

    2. Re:Boring by Ender+Wiggin+77 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. And if you call me now, I'll bump your data plan from $25 for 5MB per month, to $30 for 6GB per month. You'll be so glad for the bump in flat rate data that you'll forget to ask me how on earth it makes sense, or how I got away with it for so long.

    3. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we talk about the iPhone 3G instead?

      No. No we cannot.

    4. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do us a favour, Jobs-drone, go drink some concentrated sulphuric acide, would ya? I'm sick and tired of all that iCrap being praised and trolled here, OKAY? Lets at least widen the scope of troling and praising beyond apple products.

  3. Cellphones and America by ilovesymbian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm, from what I've noticed, most cell phone companies are not based in the US. Europe and Asia constitute most of them.

    Anyyway, I'm really excited about this as much as I'm frustrated about the number of SDKs to pick up, Symbian, Windows Mobile, now iPhone SDK.. Google's Android and then this!

    1. Re:Cellphones and America by corychristison · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm frustrated about the number of SDKs to pick up, Symbian, Windows Mobile, now iPhone SDK.. Google's Android and then this!

      It should be noted that this has been around longer than the iPhone/SDK as well as Google Android. The OpenMoko project was announced January 20th, 2007.

    2. Re:Cellphones and America by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Who cares about the announcement date?

      GNU Hurd was announced years before Linux, and look how far that project got.

      In computing what counts is shipping / release date.

    3. Re:Cellphones and America by tuaris · · Score: 2, Funny

      In computing what counts is shipping / release date.

      Exactly, take Duke Nukem Forever for example.

      --
      President/CEO Pacy World http://www.pacyworld.com
  4. This is a very good thing by impaledsunset · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OpenMoko is a very ambitious project, and, in my humble opinion, very important. But the quality of the result from the development of the software stack has been mediocre. I still have my hopes set that it will lift off, but it's still nowhere. Qtopia rocks, and it's free software, it's working, and it's cool, but the OpenMoko distributions aren't there yet, and I have the feeling that the effort is not focused. The old distro was cool, but it was abondoned. ASU is far from being usable (it is not even developer-friendly, not talking about user-friendly). FSO is still not mature. Now, this sets my hopes up. One commercial venture is interested in improving the phone. That for me means that one of the most important goals of the whole project has been achieved. Whatever the quality of the software stack is, we will have our free (as in speech) phone.

    1. Re:This is a very good thing by gumpish · · Score: 3, Informative

      No camera.

    2. Re:This is a very good thing by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I consider that a plus. If I want to take pictures of something, I'm gonna bring a good camera with me.

    3. Re:This is a very good thing by **loki969** · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      PLZ, mod parent up! I'm sick of phones that try to be everything but fail miserably.

    4. Re:This is a very good thing by Buran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who is forcing you to use the camera? Nobody. If you don't like the camera, just don't use it. It's that simple.

    5. Re:This is a very good thing by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a camera costs money. Ditch the camera and make phones cheaper. I'd rather have have a phone good at calling and SMSing than a jack of all trades machine that fails at everything.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    6. Re:This is a very good thing by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd rather have a good camera with me as well. However, 90% of the time that I want to take a picture of something it's unplanned. And there's no way I'm carrying yet another gadget around with me all the time. In those cases, low quality is better than nothing at all.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    7. Re:This is a very good thing by **loki969** · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay for something that I'm not planing to use, since even my pocket digicam shoots superior pics?

    8. Re:This is a very good thing by felix85 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yeah and the cool thing about this phone is that it can act as a USB master so if you have a digital camera you can just plug it into the phone and upload your images without a computer.

      The Neo1973's mini-USB port can be configured to act as a usb host instead of a usb device. This opens up a range of possibilities, such as USB cameras and usb input devices.

      Thats for the Neo1973 but it should also be true for the FreeRunner.

    9. Re:This is a very good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, but a camera costs money. Ditch the camera and make phones cheaper. I'd rather have have a phone good at calling and SMSing than a jack of all trades machine that fails at everything.

      You know... people said the same thing about SMS when it came out... "I just want a phone that makes calls, not one that sends text messages!"

    10. Re:This is a very good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sadly, the whole openmoko project seems to have been an exercise to show the world how clever the developers are and not actually provide a device which is useful to somewhat *clueful* people. By this, I mean that it was never intended for people with no technical interest/ability who'd be happy with a basic phone (or even a series 40) and would never install an additional application. Even people who've used linux regularly and are willing to go the extra mile to make it would would find an openmoko hard work and take a lot of time to get a part-working linux phone.

      it seems that no sooner do the devs get something just about working before they get bored and move on to something new.

      before people think I'm a linux hating anti-openmoko pro-osx/windows fanboy, I should say that I have TWO nokia tablets, TWO zauruses, my and my wife's laptop multiboot linux, my work laptop is linux.

    11. Re:This is a very good thing by **loki969** · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being able to SMS doesn't add a lot to the price, having a useful camera does. ;)

    12. Re:This is a very good thing by perlchild · · Score: 1

      Can openmoko support both models of phone, one with a cam, the other without?
      Most likely

      Will both models be offered
      Unlikely, business decision will likely nix one

      Your need of having the cam with you will most likely overrule the desire of those that want a cheaper phone that does whatever it does, 100%.

      It's regrettable, and I'm already offtopic anyways, since the choice you're not being offered has nothing to do with openmoko.

    13. Re:This is a very good thing by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      "it seems that no sooner do the devs get something just about working before they get bored and move on to something new."

      That describes a lot of open-source in general...

    14. Re:This is a very good thing by Buran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are plenty of phones to be had that can do all three. And do camera-less versions of a phone really cost less? I found one article on a camera-less Treo 680 that makes no mention of a price cut. Of course not; they're going to keep the cost difference for themselves. So you may as well have a camera handy for when something unexpected happens -- I know I've gotten some amusing shots with my phone's camera that I would have otherwise missed.

    15. Re:This is a very good thing by Buran · · Score: 1

      See my comment elsewhere in which I looked at camera-less equivalents of given phones that don't seem to cost less than their camera-equipped versions. Why would you pay the same to get less? That makes even less sense.

      I have two cameras (a point and shoot and a full pro DSLR) but a lot of the photos on my phone, which has a pretty decent (for a phone) camera, were captured at times when I never thought I'd see something interesting that I'd want to shoot.

    16. Re:This is a very good thing by zsau · · Score: 1

      Heh, well, for me none is better than the highest quality. Or anything in between. I have no particular need for a camera and no particular desire to pay for one (be it in $, g or mL) I won't use.

      --
      Look out!
    17. Re:This is a very good thing by mhall119 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The first few releases of Linux sucked too. However, just like Linux, once people start using it for their own purposes, their improvements will make their way back for others to use.

      OpenMoko right now is mediocre. OpenMoko in 5 years, after several companies sell products based on it, and dozens of hackers make those devices do new and novel things, and OpenMoko will rock.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    18. Re:This is a very good thing by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      it seems that no sooner do the devs get something just about working before they get bored and move on to something new.

      We geeks are known for having short attention spans it doesn't take much to...oh look, shiny.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    19. Re:This is a very good thing by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or is it really a fallacy?
      The fact that camera-less versions of a phone do not cost less does not mean they do not cost less to make. It just means that someone along the chain decided to keep the difference in cost.

      If it had a camera, FreeRunner would have cost more. Quite a bit more, in fact.
      IIRC they even tried to find a suitably free/open camera hardware, but only got a really poor camera, so they decided against it. And it is a good choice: the phone would have been noticeably more expensive, and the camera would have been quite crappy.

      Now, on a totally unrelated note, I'm actually amazed that they scrapped their old code and went with Enlightenment. I guess it did set them back, but E is an extremely fast platform, using much less resources than GTK.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    20. Re:This is a very good thing by Buran · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize that they don't cost the same to make. But when the cost is the same to the end user, what does it matter? One option is "you get more for less" and if there's no cost difference to the end user, why select that one?

    21. Re:This is a very good thing by Thing+1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Being able to SMS doesn't add a lot to the price, having a useful camera does. ;)

      I must respectfully disagree.

      Creating two separate product lines is quite a bit more expensive than one; that added expense will be passed on to the customer. Other manufacturers will create a single line, and not have extra expenses and thus be more competitive.

      So, after doing the competitive analysis, most manufacturers will decide to make phones with cameras, which some people may use.

      Me, I never use the popcorn button on my microwave, but I do not seek out or petition manufacturers to make microwaves lacking the popcorn button.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    22. Re:This is a very good thing by Nursie · · Score: 1

      What got my hopes upwas the announcement of official debian support.

      I'm sure that the openmoko guys are doing a great job, but they haven't produced anything stable and usable yet by all accounts.

      Suddenly, with debian support, you have a software distribution that supports, and makes available, pretty much all of the hardware. Plus it's debian, a big, stable software base with a lo of guys working on it. That's what'sgoing on my freerunner as soon as I get a moment.

    23. Re:This is a very good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I replaced my music player with Neo, so I'm actually now carrying my pocket camera with me quite a lot, since it's only the second device to carry.

    24. Re:This is a very good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That describes a lot of the entire IT industry.

    25. Re:This is a very good thing by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      So you may as well have a camera handy for when something unexpected happens -- I know I've gotten some amusing shots with my phone's camera that I would have otherwise missed.

      I have never seen ANY phone camera useful for anything unexpected. it takes forever to get to the damned camera app, launch it, wait for the camera to stabilize, take photo.... oh damn that unexpected event is already gone.

      $3.99 disposable point and shoot in my pocket? pull out, click, i'm done.

      NO DIGITAL photo format or camera on this planet can touch the speed of a disposable point and shoot on 35mm film for unexpected events.

      It's why most good photographers always have one in their pocket.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    26. Re:This is a very good thing by rakshat · · Score: 1

      The the good think about Openmoko is that you can install Qtopia (also under GPL now) if you want to by a simple one line command. I use it in that configuration as my main phone. I can't think of any other phone where it is so easy to choose the environment you want. Rakshat Disclaimer : I sell the Freerunner in India so my comments may be biased.

    27. Re:This is a very good thing by Troed · · Score: 1

      Sony Ericsson K810. Flip the lens cover on the back and shoot.

      http://www.sonyericsson.com/cyber-shot/

    28. Re:This is a very good thing by Znork · · Score: 1

      Creating two separate product lines is quite a bit more expensive than one;

      You're only counting the production cost. A camera in a cellphone is not 'free' in various design issues such as available space and layout complexity. Not only can you produce a cheaper phone without a camera, you can also produce a smaller one and/or have space for a larger battery, or make it thinner, etc. You catch the customer who wants the camera, but you lose the ones who'd want the alternative features more.

      Personally I have to agree with the GP, cameras on cellphones are an utter waste. The required optics and aperture size needed to produce even decent pictures simply cannot be reconciled with the other design requirements on a phone, so it remains a useless gimmick. I could see a use for a bluetooth/usb connected CCD and optical accessory, but the current crop of crap would be better left out.

      I never use the popcorn button on my microwave

      The popcorn button on your microwave doesn't add 30% to its size or reduce the other functionality. The camera on the phone does.

    29. Re:This is a very good thing by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I can pull my point and shoot out from my pocket and snap a photo in under 1 second, 2 if I forgot to wind the film.

      If that phone can do it in that time INCLUDING the time it takes removing it from your pocket... That's an impressive camera let alone phone.

      Most digital SLR's cant take a photo 1 second from power on, and that's with it already in your hands.. (the fault of having to focus, etc...)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    30. Re:This is a very good thing by miro+f · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... no particular desire to pay for one (be it in $, g or mL)...

      you can pay for phones with blood now?

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    31. Re:This is a very good thing by miro+f · · Score: 1

      that describes a lot of the entire world.

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    32. Re:This is a very good thing by Znork · · Score: 1

      Your need of having the cam with you will most likely overrule the desire of those that want a cheaper phone

      But will it overrule the desire of those that want a smaller phone, or one with a larger battery, or one with a cleaner design?

    33. Re:This is a very good thing by jc42 · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the camera, just don't use it. It's that simple.

      No, it's not that simple. I have my second phone with a camera, and my wife is still on her first. All three that we've had have had similar misbehavior: The cameras get turned on "automatically" when the phone is in my pocket (or her purse). We get lots of pictures of the inside of my pocket (and her purse). This really runs down the batter quickly. When I ask around, it seems that nearly everyone with a camera in their phone has this problem.

      In a couple of years with these phones, neither of us has kept any of its pictures. They're just crap that I'd be embarrassed to show to anyone. I've been thinking that I'll hold out on a newer phone until I can get a decent one without a camera. The FreeRunner seems like a good candidate, if I really can program a few apps of my own.

      This is significant, because in the past I've had two "smart phones", a Kyocera and a Blackberry, and despite all the ad claims, I was in fact never able to produce a running app on either. After some time, I finally got the support people for each to admit that they'd locked out that capability. (The BB was especially frustrating, because it was bought with employer funds explicitly so that I could program it for a project. The telco's double-crossing us that way led to them being excluded from further consideration for our projects. But that's a different complaint. ;-)

      In any case, I think I'll wait a few months, see what the reports are from the field, before I decide to throw away some more money on a phone that may or may not permit me to do what I want with it. I waited a few months with the iPhone, and I'm glad I did.

      But "no camera" is definitely a feature, in my mind. I'd much prefer extra battery or memory.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    34. Re:This is a very good thing by jc42 · · Score: 1

      "it seems that no sooner do the devs get something just about working before they get bored and move on to something new."

      That describes a lot of open-source in general...

      Heh. With only a slight rewording, it also applies to most commercial, proprietary stuff:

      No sooner do the devs get something just about working before they find that the marketers have been selling it and delivering it in its incomplete state, complete with promises that it'll do all sorts of things that the devs have never heard about.

      When the customer complaints about missing features start rolling in, the devs are ordered to work on those features instead of wasting time debugging the original software (which must be good enough, because the customers bought it, didn't they?) ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    35. Re:This is a very good thing by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize that they don't cost the same to make. But when the cost is the same to the end user, what does it matter?

      It matters, because if the cost were the same, it would be the cost of the more expensive device. So the FreeRunner would cost twice as much.
      I'd thought this was a geek site, where a humanities guy like me would be one of the worst in maths. Guess I was wrong.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    36. Re:This is a very good thing by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      I think there are very few people who use a cell phone camera as their 'photograph' camera. Myself I use it when I need a quick picture for a project or a nice turd picture to email to select family/friends.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    37. Re:This is a very good thing by Buran · · Score: 1

      And then you have to send it out for processing, wait for it to come back, etc. etc. No thanks. Turns into an $8 or $10 camera, too. Digital, it's paid for already.

      And you missed the point of "having a camera with you at ALL times, since there are times when you won't have a camera with you" since by definition that covers times when you didn't bring it with you, or it's in your car and you aren't, or whatever.

      Besides, in my experience those $4 disposables take even crappier pictures than even cellphones do... they're the definition of cheap optics.

    38. Re:This is a very good thing by Buran · · Score: 1

      I've never had my phone accidentally take a picture when I didn't want it to, but then I always set it up so that accidentally pressing one of the buttons couldn't take a photo or do anything else undesired. And the presence of something isn't going to run down the battery unless you use it excessively. I don't think it's fair to blame the feature of the phone for draining the battery with what you admit is excessive use, even if it is accidental -- figure out why it's happening and change whatever you need to change to stop it from happening, that's fair.

      As for not getting any good photos -- well, it's not the camera that makes or breaks the photo. It's the skill of the photographer. I'm a photographer by hobby and the same skills that help me get great shots with my full-pro digital SLR helps me get great shots with other cameras I've used -- including the simplistic cameras in cell phones.

    39. Re:This is a very good thing by Buran · · Score: 1

      You're still not getting what I'm angling at, and insulting my skills is totally uncalled for just because you don't like and/or don't get what I'm saying.

      I'm not talking about mythical camera-ified versions of a half-baked phone (where did you get the idea that I was talking about a mythical OpenMoko camera phone? I never said that; you inserted that all on your own). In fact, my example was a phone made by a totally different company that has been making smart phones for a very long time, not the half-baked OpenMoko phone that people here are having fits over in arious forms. My example was a model that is available with and without cameras. And I said that it was pointless to choose the cameraless version of a phone if it doesn't cost any less than the camera-equipped version, which seems to be the case, when both are available.

      Don't humanities courses teach you to look at what has been said before and not snatch assumptions out of the air and apply them with no basis that they're the same thing that previous dicussions in the thread have been about? You're the one who randomly applied my comments to a device I wasn't applying them to, and then used your incorrect assumption to slam me based on something I never said.

    40. Re:This is a very good thing by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... well, it's not the camera that makes or breaks the photo. It's the skill of the photographer.

      Well, I guess I must be pretty unskilled. I just can't find out how to make my cell phone's camera focus. Do you know where they hid the focus control? TFM doesn't seem to mention it, and if I google for either of our cameras' model names and "focus", I don't seem to find anything relevant. But if you can make them take pics that are in focus, there must be a way.

      Now maybe you prefer that "soft focus" effect, and I agree that sometimes it's very artsy. But it's not the style I'm usually looking for.

      One case where I've thought my cell phone's camera would be handy is for photos of funny signage, like the photos you see on sites like engrish.com or carcino.gen.nz. But in the few cases I've tried, the results weren't really focused well enough to be legible, and if you can't read the sign, the point of the photo sorta gets lost. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    41. Re:This is a very good thing by Buran · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, focus often sucks. A tip: autofocus is sometimes based on contrast so look for high-contrast areas to place in your photo, if possible. Some AF algorithms also lock more easily onto vertical lines, like the bars of a fence. Also, there is a minimum focus distance with nearly all lenses -- perhaps you're too close? I've gotten lousy images due to that before.

      Not saying phone cameras are perfect -- just useful in a pinch.

    42. Re:This is a very good thing by Troed · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you can do with your pocket camera (which, due to using film, cannot take thousands of pictures and upload them straight to your favourite web service) - I was simply pointing out that there exists products on the market since a while back that works perfectly for the situations you describe.

      The issue has more to do with your technophobia than with reality.

    43. Re:This is a very good thing by Znork · · Score: 1

      Myself I use it when I need a quick picture for a project

      Yah, I keep trying to use if for things like that myself. Taking pictures off serial numbers on servers (didn't work, the cam cant focus close enough to make out the text), disassembly pictures to know how to put stuff back together (again, focus/detail conflict), snapping shots of stuff at parties (doesn't work, not enough lighting), etc. It seems one has to carry around an industrial lighting and power supply to actually provide the conditions under which a cameraphone can take adequate pictures. Which tends to be rather more difficult to carry around than an actual camera. Not to mention that people might get annoyed when you turn on the floodlights at the party.

      No matter what use one tries to put it to, it turns out to be inadequate. Usually I'm better off with a damn pencil, drawing whatever I want a picture off if I don't have a camera handy.

    44. Re:This is a very good thing by zsau · · Score: 1

      What!? I was thinking more along the lines of millilitres measure volume i.e. three-dimensional space. Having a camera in my phone makes my phone just that much larger. Really going straight from mL -> blood is just weird and confusing. If you were here in person and realised I was making a joke I would question your sanity.

      --
      Look out!
    45. Re:This is a very good thing by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sorry, it's just that:

      1. TFA is about OpenMoko/FreeRunner.
      2. Your grand-grand-something-parent complained that OpenMoko/FreeRunner had no camera.
      3. I never got an idea you were talking about OpenMoko/FreeRunner; I was talking about them, for a very good reason (see above).

      Now, if you wanted to respond just to a little part of my post, you should have quoted that part; otherwise I was quite justified to think you were respnding to the whole. And excuse me for discussing the topic. I know it is bad manners for Slashdot.

      Oh, and please do not slam me with things I could turn right back at you. It's poor form, leads to flaming, and I'm not here to flame. I have my religious fanatics on another forum for that.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    46. Re:This is a very good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big question is how the camera affects purchasing. If enough additional people are brought onboard to purchase a given phone by the addition of the camera, such that it decreases the unit price or makes a given camera viable in the first place - does it hurt to have it in there?

      I've only just jumped on the bandwagon of cell ownership (due to pregnant wife), but have found a marginal but useful benefit to having a camera in it. Mostly taking pictures of interesting vehicles passing by on the street (like an amphicar) or my dog doing foolish things. Taken about 20 pics in the last 6 months.

    47. Re:This is a very good thing by JSund · · Score: 1

      Most digital SLR's cant take a photo 1 second from power on, and that's with it already in your hands.. (the fault of having to focus, etc...)

      If your camera has a fixed focus, you could as well compare it to setting manual focus and a small aperture on a D-SLR beforehand. If you do that, most major brands of D-SLRs include models that allow image capture in less than one second:

      Even with focusing, some SLRs with near-instant power on times coupled with fast focusing lenses should be able to get the first shot within one second of powering on given good conditions.

  5. American companies by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Insightful

    well, Apple/ATT have the iPhone. Sprint, T Mobile, google, and others are more interested in Android.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:American companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      T-Mobile is a German company.

    2. Re:American companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent isn't offtopic. T-Mobile really is a German company.

      And, by some strange coincidence, the most open cell provider in the US and the only cell provider offering Android phones. None of the US providers have any plans to do so.

    3. Re:American companies by hitmark · · Score: 1

      probably because they can lock them down more...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  6. Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the american companies have put their efforts behind Google...

    1. Re:Android by CockMonster · · Score: 1

      The American companies are putting their efforts behind everyone. AT&T jumped on the Symbian bandwagon, which is quite a big deal. Motorola has also been on it for years. It's a pity their phones sucked.

    2. Re:Android by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      You sure Motorola has been on the Symbian bandwagon, I thought they made their own junk and Nokia was the Symbian heavyweight.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
  7. But 2008.08 is broken by H0p313ss · · Score: 0

    Now that the OpenMoko platform has stabilized enough to provide the OM2008 image

    Except that 2008.08 doesn't actually work... it's pretty much alpha quality. (And yes there's workarounds but really... they called this a release?)

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  8. Working on other things than immature phones by Buran · · Score: 3, Informative

    The OpenMoko project has been around for a long time but it's been development only and unusable for the end user. US cellphone companies want to be able to sell something to end users now. They don't want an unfinished piece of junk that they don't know anything about -- they want their existing suppliers to give them USABLE phones.

    Once this thing becomes polished and usable, at least as polished and usable as cell phones get, then we might see some interest.

    1. Re:Working on other things than immature phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US cellphone companies want to be able to sell something to end users now. They don't want an unfinished piece of junk that they don't know anything about -- they want their existing suppliers to give them USABLE phones.

      You mean the cellphone companies, or the service providers? Because the service providers don't give a shit about whether the phone is usable. The first thing they do when preparing to support a new phone is rip out all the usable portions and lock them up behind exorbitant monthly fees.

      Remember Android? Google's attempt at creating an open phone stack? A total of one provider in the US is planning on supporting them: T-Mobile. And that's because T-Mobile is actually a German company. None of the US-based service providers have any intention of allowing Android devices on their networks - in Sprint's case, that's despite joining the group behind Android.

      So, not surprisingly, none of them care about OpenMoko. US companies don't care about openness, because they really don't have to. Customers are more than happy to buy locked phones in the US, and there are very few options for porting phones between providers. In fact, for Sprint and Verizon, there are no options: only phones bought through them will actually work.

      Openness and the US cell service companies go together like water and sodium.

    2. Re:Working on other things than immature phones by Buran · · Score: 1

      You do realize you're talking about an unreleased system that will be put on unreleased phones? It's awfully early to draw a conclusion about who will and won't support it, and besides, if you really want one you can buy and activate it yourself.

      People don't buy unlocked phones because they don't KNOW about them because the phone makers don't do a very good job advertising them. If that changed and it wasn't the service providers running the ads (which are naturally for their own versions) then people might buy them. But how is the average person going to buy a product when they don't even know about it? There are products that aren't advertised because of word of mouth demand being good enough (like the Honda Fit, right now) and there are those that aren't advertised for other reasons and consequently experience low demand.

      If you're going to blame anyone for the failure of a product to sell, why don't you ask the company that makes it why they don't tell anyone they're selling it?

      "Hey, why isn't my widget selling?!"

      "You make a widget? I didn't know that. Why didn't you tell me when I was in the market?"

      "Well, uh ..."

    3. Re:Working on other things than immature phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux project has been around for a long time but it's been development only and unusable for the end user. US computer companies want to be able to sell something to end users now. They don't want an unfinished piece of junk that they don't know anything about -- they want their existing suppliers to give them USABLE computers.

      Once this thing becomes polished and usable, at least as polished and usable as operating systems get, then we might see some interest.

    4. Re:Working on other things than immature phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't want an unfinished piece of junk that they don't know anything about

      Isn't this ridiculous? US phone companies have tons of money and stuff and all they want to do is wait for perfect solution and resell it using their monopoly? Those are 'other things' they work, right?

  9. Last time I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    .. Canada was still in America.

    1. Re:Last time I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as many other countries, like Mexico, Brazil, Peru, Argentina, Chile...

  10. A few Canadian thoughts... by Sentry21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After looking at the Koolu.com website, I'd almost rather they not be referred to as Canadian... it makes us look bad...

    So some Canadian firms think that an open-source handset is going to be worthwhile. Great, good for them. The likelihood is that even if they do get anywhere with it, the majority of their clients are going to be in the US anyway. The average person in Canada doesn't know or care about open-source handsets, and isn't going to care enough to learn.

    It's kind of like RIM - they were the first to really get mobile, business e-mail out into the world, and now they're famous. Everyone who doesn't have an iPhone has a blackberry these days, and most of RIM's clients are in the US. Where were the American companies? What does it matter?

    In this era of free trade and globalization, there's hardly any distinction between American companies and Canadian companies. I work for a Canadian company which is owned by an American company which is run by the Canadian company. We're traded on an American stock exchange, we all work in Canada, and we just bought an American company made up almost entirely of Brits and Irish. So what does that make us?

    'Canadian company' these days only refers to locality - where people show up for work at every morning. Beyond that, it doesn't make a difference.

    1. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      I work for a Canadian company which is owned by an American company which is run by the Canadian company. We're traded on an American stock exchange, we all work in Canada, and we just bought an American company made up almost entirely of Brits and Irish. So what does that make us?

      Subjects to the Queen?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After looking at the Koolu.com website, I'd almost rather they not be referred to as Canadian... it makes us look bad.

      Holy crap are you right. Spinning animated gifs, more bold text than unbold in a paragraph, horrible web layout with bad wrapping. Outright lies like "Freerunner is a ruggedized mini tablet".

      Best of all though, is the pyramid scheme they setup in the last paragraph. Good luck Koolu, you'll be lucky to last a week

      OpenMoko folks: find someone who's actually competent to handle your distribution, please?

    3. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After hearing about Joe Biden's tech record, almost nothing could make Canada look bad to me.

    4. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I could not agree with you more, perhaps Canada would be a better place to spout your communist hatred for the RIAA and the MPAA. Hippy.

    5. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subjects to the Queen?

      Fair enough. When we took our consitution to Britain in '82, we found she was the only person who had read and understood the documents.

      Now, when she passes and it's time to change the picture on our money, we'll probably ask if we really want to continue being a monarchy. (And say No, after looking at the princelings.) But right now and for several decades we've essentially had a genial and intelligent grandmother in the background. We seldom think about her, and when we do it's a nostalgic fondness. She's heritage like a grand building or an original forest. We are "Subject" to that.

      PS - since the poster specifically said "Brits and Irish", he meant the Republic of Ireland, who are not subjects of the Queen.

    6. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

      "The average person in Canada doesn't know or care about open-source handsets, and isn't going to care enough to learn."

      Ok, but I DO CARE!!! I just bought an Open Moko Phone during the recent iPhone controversy in Canada. I also just got an iPhone when it turned out that Fido would give it to me for FREE since I had enough Fido Dollars (whatever those are, didn't even know I had them) to pay for it fully and beyond. Ok, now the Open Moko is a brick just like my iPhone today (iPhone crashed, Open Moko has been basically useless).

      What's next? How do I upgrade OpenMoko phone? Currently it's crap. Gotta get the next stuff onto it. Can't wait for the GPhone stuff.

    7. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      The average person in Canada doesn't know or care about open-source handsets, and isn't going to care enough to learn.

      And the average person in the US does?

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    8. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      The average person in Canada doesn't know or care about open-source handsets, and isn't going to care enough to learn.

      Can't speak for Canadians myself, but I know a few non techy Apple fans that won't buy the iPhone because it is too locked down, they don't feel confident to crack it themselves and they are sick of otherwise good phones being rendered shitty by rude business practices. These are die hard Apple fans who don't know or care what open source is - computers work because plug them in and turn them on and there are two kinds, Macs or PCs which all run windows. They are starting to understand that their toys can't do certain things you'd think they should because they are deliberately made that way.

      So if OpenMoko does eventually get out of the pre alpha stage and provide something useful and pretty, I'm sure it would sell like hotcakes to these non-tech types. The fact that it's open source is irrelevant, the fact that it's open isn't.

      After looking at the Koolu.com website, I'd almost rather they not be referred to as Canadian... it makes us look bad...

      I wouldn't be so hard on them. Looking at the W.E. Appliance, I think you should be proud. There's a simple and cheap product that I find quite tempting for some applications.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    9. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the whole point. All companies don't have brand names (or funds for that matter) such as Apple or MS etc. Therefore an open standard in mobile devices is ideal for integrating with devices outside of the brand. Sure if you have an iCar and iPhone and iBook and iBed you might be able to have them communicate freely, or even synchronize them through iTunes (I don't know), but then you also submit to a real life dependency hell and before you know it you have an iLife and a halfeaten apple on your forehead (life experience might change during offline play).

      For those of us enjoying freedom of choice OpenMoko is a project to keep a future eye on, regardless of the American corporates.

    10. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      The thing I find odd about these people who complain about things like the system being 'locked down' is that in my experience, the iPhone is, in practice, no more locked down than any other smartphone.

      You can't install homebrew apps on it, but then most people never do that anyway. You can't put another OS on it, but again, no one does that. You can only use it on AT&T - ok, I can respect that people have reasons not to be on AT&T.

      In comparison to other smartphones and PDAs I've used, the iPhone beats them all in all the ways I've seen. Couple that with what's turning out to be free upgrades for life, vs. Windows Mobile's philosophy of 'Well, buy a new phone', and it looks pretty good ot me.

    11. Re:A few Canadian thoughts... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      We're in a group that plays music and we often share files at rehearsal via bluetooth so we can get to know them. The one guy that has an iPhone is left out of that one. All the Nokias, Motorolas and Sony Ericssons are happy to exchange and play mp3s, iPhone isn't.

      Anything that is done over a network has to be done through Telstra and just about every application involves using the network. My current phone pretends to be a flash drive and lets me read/write whatever I want over usb. Would an iPhone? My current phone lets me use whatever wifi point I can configure. iPhone?

      These things are all really simple and I would expect these things to be possible on an iPhone, without even touching on how easy it is for me to make my own apps. Seriously, these things aren't apples, they're lemons.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
  11. No we won't. by StarKruzr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    American carriers are not only completely uninterested in a platform that gives the end-user complete control over their phone, but actively shunning it. Their business model is to sell slick-looking, crippled devices that push as much functionality through their networks as possible such that they can charge the end-user as much as they can for things that should be free. Verizon and the V710 debacle a few years ago come directly to mind (disabling OBEX, etc.).

    I'll be shocked if we ever see a viable OpenMoko device in the next ten years.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:No we won't. by Buran · · Score: 1

      Do you mean period or from an existing carrier? If it's sold unlocked there's nothing the GSM carriers at least can do to block it from being used on their networks.

  12. Love the concept but too bad about the Glamo gpu by NocturnHimtatagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is mainly from the viewpoint of a graphics programmer (3d, gpu drivers, ...), so my comments will focus on that part. I know there are a lot good features on this devices.

    The Glamo chip can only use textures of 512 x 512 so it's impossible to use hw acceleration to decompress full screen video (unless you stretch the texture to the entire screen).

    The video bus bandwidth is 7m/s which gives a theoretical maximum of 12 fps without hw acceleration. That bus is also shared with the sd card reducing the bandwidth even further if you are accessing the sd card.

    SMedia refuses to give out the documentation of their gpu and only employees of OpenMoko have access to that documentation. Implementing 3D for the glamo is low priority. It's obvious it's low priority but it's a shame there's a gpu in there but you can't use it or even improve the driver.

  13. They're occupied elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    writing software that makes money.

  14. So I think they are American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the device scape web site they seem to have both American and Canadian offices.

  15. canada is involved in this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and here i thought canadians were a bit smarter than that.

  16. Re:second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, uh, I hear you liek mudkipz.

  17. "Where are the American companies?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waiting for a reply from Openmoko tech support.

  18. Shunning? You forget Andriod. by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    American carriers are not only completely uninterested in a platform that gives the end-user complete control over their phone, but actively shunning it

    Android answers the description you provide, and there seem to be a number of carriers embracing it.

    They are driven to do so by the iPhone but that makes little difference in that things are moving that way, and carriers realize now that it will happen sooner rather than later.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. Re:Love the concept but too bad about the Glamo gp by poopdeville · · Score: 1

    The video bus bandwidth is 7m/s

    Okay, and how long is the bus?

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  20. Re:Shunning? You forget Andriod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If by "a number" you mean "two".

    Unless by embracing you mean "offering devices using" in which case that's "one": T-Mobile.

    Sprint "joined" the Open Handset Alliance, but currently "has no plans" to allow such devices on their network. Sprint's chief concern? Android is "too open".

    That's not quite how they worded it, but if you read between the lines, you'll realize that Sprint isn't quite about to allow a truly open device on their network.

  21. Canadians are Americans!... by novian · · Score: 1

    as are Mexican and US citizens. No?

    1. Re:Canadians are Americans!... by substance2003 · · Score: 1

      In the same way that french, english, italians etc... are Europeens.

    2. Re:Canadians are Americans!... by thirty-seven · · Score: 1

      In the same way that french, english, italians etc... are Europeens.

      Canadians (and Mexicans) are North Americans in the same way that that French, English, Italians, etc are Europeans. But Canadians are only Americans to the same extent that French, English, Italians, etc are Eurasians.
      I've decided that the next time someone from a European country smugly points out that I am an "American" because I'm from "the Americas" or "the American continent" (which assumes that I am obscenely geographically ignorant to need that pointed out to me, and which also ignores the context and almost all idiomatic usage of the term "American" in any English dialect), I will point out that they are a Eurasian and continue referring to them as such until they stop calling me American.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    3. Re:Canadians are Americans!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Pangaean. Or at least I was,

    4. Re:Canadians are Americans!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Englishmen should stay on their island, drink their tea and say:
      "I've been to europe last week?"
      "Smashing! Where did you go?"
      "To France"

      Brits != Europes

      Decide yourself about Canada.

  22. I am going to get modded down for this by vosester · · Score: 2

    I remember reading about the OpenMoko long before the iPhone, and the day the final spec where out I when and bought an Iphone why, no 3G or EDGE

    Apple leave 3G out of the first gen iPhone and they get crucified, but this phone has no 3G or EDGE and it is OK because it is open source? WTF!

    I would love an open phone. But you have to be the first one to the market with mobile's because of those 18 month contracts. Why do I have to wait two years for them to catch up with other company's who have stuff already on the self?

    No other company offers the functionality of the iPhone. Yes Yes, you had email and internet on mobile phones for years but was it nice to use, I bet not.

    I think Android will be the big player in the future, but they approach is broken due to Java.

    With Linux becoming more and more popular, I had high hopes for OpenMoko because developers could code in a simpler environment as both desktop and mobile application could share the same code base.

    I know software stacks don't just grow over night, trust me the iPhone has problems of it's own.

    I also think the next big thing is MID's, when Intel announced this I thought they were mad. But after using a development one with 3G and Skype, it was one of the best experience with a mobile device bar none, crappy battery life was the only problem and this is where Intel will lose to ARM.

    If I could get the same MID with cellular phone capability's and an ARM CPU, My iPhone would be straight in the blender.

    As the 3G on the iPhone is shit, the same MID as above had a full bars of 3G where I live but the iPhone, I only seen two or three in some areas.

    So if the next software update does not fix this, I will be sending it back and looking for an new mobile. And it will not be for OpenMoko or Apple because of constant delays and sub par hardware.

    Rant over

    1. Re:I am going to get modded down for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I am going to get modded down for this

      -1, Lame Social Engineering

      You're also missing the point of the Openmoko platform as it exists today.

  23. Re:Shunning? You forget Andriod. by CockMonster · · Score: 1

    An open-source OS does not mean the end-user can do what they want. It means the phone manufactures can do what they want.

  24. If AT&T/T-Mobile could ban OpenMoko, they woul by jonwil · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If AT&T and T-Mobile could legally and technically ban use of OpenMoko phones on their network, they would do it.

  25. Unlikely by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    An open-source OS does not mean the end-user can do what they want.

    Even with a closed source OS (iPhone) users can do as they like (Jailbreak).

    The ease of developing for an open source OS is even greater, since the official SDK grants you a view to the lowest levels of operation and makes it that much easier to change what you like.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't the iPhone run a variant of Darwin? Isn't that open source? Yet, your choices even to *install* an app are 1. Jailbreak 2. iTunes.

      There will be some sort certification process involved with writing apps for Android. Otherwise, there would be open source VOIP apps that would run over the carriers' networks. They will not allow that.

    2. Re:Unlikely by hitmark · · Score: 1

      and have the apple staff refuse to look at the device because its jailbroken, what fun.

      thing is that the way android is designed, its much how osx is designed.

      sure you have a open source kernel and base libs, but everything else above that is at least somewhat proprietary.

      android has its own java variation for instance.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    3. Re:Unlikely by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      and have the apple staff refuse to look at the device because its jailbroken, what fun.

      It's called "restoring the device". Which is something you'd try to do first anyway, and you wouldn't take anything in for repair without backing it up, right?

      thing is that the way android is designed, its much how osx is designed.

      Not at all. Android has the entire system from the ground up exposed, while Apple is more careful to keep apps within a specific API that exposes some aspects of the system at all levels, but not all things at all levels.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Unlikely by Big+Bill+the+Conjure · · Score: 1

      There are VoIP clients for WinMo and S60 devices. Not open source, but freely available.

    5. Re:Unlikely by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Otherwise, there would be open source VOIP apps that would run over the carriers' networks. They will not allow that.

      No, they would love that, but only an idiot would use it.

      You seem to be unaware of the fact that with US carriers voice calls are effectively free, while data is metered at exorbitant rates. For example, SMS messages cost $0.10-0.15 each if you don't buy a texting plan.

      On the other hand, a way to disguise data transmission as a voice call might be interesting (IPOV?).

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  26. The company is Canadian. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    In this era of extranational interference, there's hardly any distinction between American companies and Canadian companies.

    Just follow the money up the top, ignoring the "holier-than-thou" shareholder class (voting, not mutual fund). You will find that they are Canadian with a desire to end-run business law.

    Where were the American companies? What does it matter?

    Quality and jurisdictional accountability, perhaps. Think of that next time when a knockoff product breaks too easily. Think of it when you get mindless tech support and shoddy code.

    It does make a difference.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  27. They're blocking it right now. by StarKruzr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Carriers are exerting pressure on baseband manufacturers to ensure that they do not open specifications required to get open-source software to work with advanced basebands that work with EDGE, EvDO, or HS*PA. So all you get is plain GPRS and voice, on the one baseband that was available to be used with the FreeRunner.

    Don't expect this to change anytime soon. It won't. If necessary, the carriers will exert pressure on Congress to pass a law banning open source operating systems on cellular devices in the name of "security."

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:They're blocking it right now. by Buran · · Score: 1

      Then why is it you can buy unlocked phones right now that have 3G?

    2. Re:They're blocking it right now. by LarsG · · Score: 1

      [Citation needed]

      I would guess that it is more an issue of baseband chip manufacturers not wanting to provide open documentation.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  28. Dialing from the command line. by Animats · · Score: 4, Funny

    At last, a phone from Linux fanatics! You can dial from the command line. Just type:

    /etc/init.d/gsmd stop
    echo 0 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/gta01-pm-gsm.0/power_on
    echo 1 > /sys/bus/platform/devices/gta01-pm-gsm.0/power_on
    cu -l /dev/ttySAC0

    AT+CFUN=1
    AT+CPIN="<pin>"
    AT+COPS
    ATD<number>

    You are now connected. See how easy it is!

    1. Re:Dialing from the command line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do this with any phone if you have the drivers.

    2. Re:Dialing from the command line. by Narnie · · Score: 1

      Sweet!!! now I can setup a script and speed dial!!!

      $sudo sh speeddial-1.sh

      Hell, I bet you could ssh into the phone and then call people too.

      --
      greed@All_Evils:~#
  29. Uploading images from your camera by dotlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You don't need to use a phone to upload camera pictures. There's an SD memory card which you can put into your digital camera that can upload images via Wi-Fi: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye-Fi/

    --
    Transmitting energy without a license.
  30. You make no sense. by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 2

    She appointed all of her power over Canada to the Governor General, who makes law whatever our government tells him to.

    She exerts no power over us at all, why rebel against her? Figure out what you're talking about for fuck sakes.

  31. Unlocked phones by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Those are still limited by their operating systems. What open Linux-based phones that have 3G exist?

    (Hint: There aren't any.)

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Unlocked phones by Buran · · Score: 1

      What open Linux-based phones that are actually usable exist, period? I don't think there ARE any, and openmoko doesn't count as it's hardly exactly usable.

    2. Re:Unlocked phones by denttford · · Score: 1

      Huh? Am I missing something here?

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    3. Re:Unlocked phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think when he says "open Linux-based phones", he means ones where you can modify the operating system and run any program you want. The existing 3G Linux phones appear to be quite closed in this respect.

    4. Re:Unlocked phones by denttford · · Score: 1

      I suppose you are right, but the GP was talking about unlocked phones (by which I assumed he meant SIM network unlocked phones) and also, I know it is not out yet, shows a 3g phone that has a fricken mouse attached to it. Nothing is going to be as open as openmoko, but as long as there is a linux phone with binary drivers for the transceiver chipset(s), it'll work and the rest is hackable.

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
  32. Re:If AT&T/T-Mobile could ban OpenMoko, they w by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if they could legally ban unlocked phones on their network they would do it. In fact most of their retarded phone workers think this already when I call up for a new sim to add to my plan...

    ME: I need a sim to add to my contract.
    THEM: SIM why? has your old one stopped?
    ME: NO I'm adding a new line to my contract and I need a sim.
    THEM: Then you need a phone as well, we have several to choose from....
    ME: NO, I need the sim I already have a phone.
    THEM: You haveto have an AT&T phone to work on our network....
    ME:NO, It's unlocked it already works, please semm me a SIM card...
    THEM: OMG!!!OMG!!!OMG!!! UNLOCKED? That against the law! FCC violation! are you a terrorist? OMG!!OMG!!OMG!!

    ME: Please, I want a sim card... please?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  33. Re:If AT&T/T-Mobile could ban OpenMoko, they w by xgr3gx · · Score: 1

    Jerkbags. I know they want to protect their business and everything, but come on...way to cripple innovation.

    --
    Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
  34. Re:Shunning? You forget Andriod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all about backing...

    Look who's behind Android. Now look who's behind OpenMoko.

    The Carriers KNOW they have to play nice with Android, lest Google create an alternate comm. system and completely undermine the existing Cell marketplace. And yes. I fully believe they have the engineering capabilities, dark fiber, and money to do such a thing.

    Now look at OpenMoko. Community developed, open design... Trying to inject itself onto a Commercially Monopolized market.

    Oil and Water my friend. Oil and Water.

  35. Where are the American companies? by kidcharles · · Score: 1

    They're in Denver.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  36. A monarch makes no sense! by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    Actually it's you who need to get your facts straight about the Queen of Canada. She still has a Corporation Sole that is Canada! She is a British Person not a Canadian!

    "The Crown represents the basic political ideals which all Canadians share. It stands for the idea that individual people matter more than theories; that we are all subject to the rule of law. These ideals are guaranteed by a common loyalty, through the sovereign, to community and country.[5]" - Queen Elizabeth II, Regina, 1987

    She does not in any way speak for me! Thus her statement is false! I have ZERO loyalty to her. She's just an old rich pompous lady pretending in silly political games.

    Canada simply does not need a silly monarchy. It's a stupid anti-democratic tradition that should be epunged from Canada. It's time to move on. It makes those who follow it look like idiots.

    Here is your lesson in facts:

    The monarchy of Canada, also known as the Canadian monarchy,[1][2] is a constitutional system of government in which a hereditary monarch is the sovereign and head of state of Canada,[3] forming the core of the country's Westminster style parliamentary democracy.[4] The terms Crown in Right of Canada, Her Majesty in Right of Canada, or The Queen in Right of Canada may also be used to refer to the entire executive of the government of Canada. Though the Canadian Crown has its roots in the French and British Crowns, it has evolved over the centuries to become a distinctly Canadian institution.[5] represented by unique symbols, and sometimes being colloquially dubbed the Maple Crown;[6] a term first coined by Governor General Lord Grey in 1905.[7]

    The present monarch is Elizabeth II - officially titled Queen of Canada (French: Reine du Canada) - who has reigned since February 6, 1952. She, her consort and other members of the Canadian Royal Family undertake various public and private functions across Canada and on behalf of the country abroad. However, the Queen is the only member of the Royal Family with any constitutional role, holding ultimate executive authority,[4][8] though her Royal Prerogative remains bound by laws enacted by her in parliament and by conventions and precedents,[3] leaving the day-to-day exercise of executive power to her Cabinet. While several powers are the sovereign's alone, most of the royal constitutional and ceremonial duties in Canada are carried out by the Queen's representative, the Governor General;[3] as such, the Governor General can sometimes be referred to as the de facto head of state.[9] In each of Canada's provinces the monarch is represented by a lieutenant governor.[3] The territories are not sovereign, and thus do not have a viceroy.