Slashdot Mirror


Carbon-Neutral Ziggurat Could House 1.1 Million In Dubai

Engadget is reporting that a new pyramid-shaped city of the future, dubbed a "Ziggurat," is being touted by Dubai-based environmental design company, Timelinks. Claiming that their design allows for an almost self-sufficient energy footprint and, obviously, economy of space, the real trick would be getting 1.1 million people to live in such close proximity. "Martijn Kramer, managing director of The International Institute for the Urban Environment told WAN: 'As a general reaction the Ziggurat Project is viable from a technical point of view. However reflecting from a more sustainable holistic approach we do wonder if the food supply and waste system are taken care for, as the concept seems rather based upon carbon neutrality and energy saving.' Kramer's initial reaction to 'Ziggurat' also raises a very important issue: are people willing to live in a mega building of 2.3 sq km? Will the thought of living in a machine comfort people?"

88 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Let's find out. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will the thought of living in a machine comfort people?

    Let's find out from some people who live in an actual machine. Morpheus, what do you think?

    Morpheus: The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

    for an opposing viewpoint, let's ask Cypher. Cypher?

    Cypher: You know, I know this steak doesn't exist. I know that when I put it in my mouth, the Matrix is telling my brain that it is juicy and delicious. After nine years, you know what I realize?
    [Takes a bite of steak]
    Cypher: Ignorance is bliss.

    and, finally, for another insight, we'll ask Agent Smith:

    Agent Smith: Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed we lacked the programming language to describe your perfect world. But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through suffering and misery. The perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from. Which is why the Matrix was redesigned to this: the peak of your civilization.

    1. Re:Let's find out. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot to get the opinion of the savior, The One himself, as to what he thinks of these Ziggurats.

      Neo: Whoa!

      So there ya have it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Let's find out. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 3, Funny

      > You forgot to get the opinion of the savior,
      > The One himself, as to what he thinks of these Ziggurats.

      Why should the people of Dubai care what Senator Obama thinks?

    3. Re:Let's find out. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why should the people of Dubai care what Senator Obama thinks?

      See, and here I thought Obama was more like Morpheus, who would lead the revolution and find The One, but that ultimately the Real Deal would be a pasty white guy who honestly isn't nearly as cool.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Let's find out. by ZedmanAuk · · Score: 4, Funny

      See, and here I thought Obama was more like Morpheus, who would lead the revolution and find The One, but that ultimately the Real Deal would be a pasty white guy who honestly isn't nearly as cool.

      Biden?

      --
      -ZA
  2. right up till... by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone crashes a A340F full of explosives into it. Or sets fires in it, or...
    Well you get the idea. Good idea but a great target.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:right up till... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok, ok, we'll build a fence around it. Sheesh!

    2. Re:right up till... by merreborn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      right up till... Someone crashes a A340F full of explosives into it. Or sets fires in it, or...
      Well you get the idea. Good idea but a great target.

      I just saw the NOVA episode about NIST's report on the WTC collapse.

      One interesting fact they mentioned: in the event of a disaster, sky scrapers are not designed to be evacuated. There isn't enough room in the stairwells to get thousands of people down dozens of floors in a timely fashion.

      In the event of fire, people are supposed to generally stay in place, while a few floors near the fire are evacuated. Fire is then fought in place on the effected floors.

      If it's not possible to get a few thousand people out of the WTC in an hour or two, then there's no way you'll ever evacuate a million people from a single building.

    3. Re:right up till... by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Someone crashes a A340F full of explosives into it. Or sets fires in it, or...

      If it's that large, nothing short of a nuke will take it out quickly. A big fire might take it out eventually, but it will take a while.

      You did remind me of something though.

      the real trick would be getting 1.1 million people to live in such close proximity.

      Why not put the poor in there? Putting poor people in close proximity housing is a great idea!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    4. Re:right up till... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Be fair. It could happen any place.
      Toyko, Oklahoma, or the Middle East.
      One of the sad rules of the Universe is that it is a lot easier to destroy than to create. It only takes a few evil nut jobs willing to die to create a lot of misery.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:right up till... by rmadmin · · Score: 3, Funny

      A white picket fence? And we'll lock it from the inside!!! BRILLIANT!

    6. Re:right up till... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's pretty dangerous to exit a skyscraper from the side halfway up. A pyramid, however, can have dozens of exits all over it's surface. They may not be all that safe, depending on the slope, but better than straight down. After all, it's an emergency exit.

    7. Re:right up till... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Informative

      If it's that large, nothing short of a nuke will take it out quickly. A big fire might take it out eventually, but it will take a while.

      Looking at the concept art, it looks like a fire would have a hard time spreading throughout the structure.

    8. Re:right up till... by kabocox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One interesting fact they mentioned: in the event of a disaster, sky scrapers are not designed to be evacuated. There isn't enough room in the stairwells to get thousands of people down dozens of floors in a timely fashion.
      In the event of fire, people are supposed to generally stay in place, while a few floors near the fire are evacuated. Fire is then fought in place on the effected floors.
      If it's not possible to get a few thousand people out of the WTC in an hour or two, then there's no way you'll ever evacuate a million people from a single building.

      Did you just not get it? Why would you evacuate a city or large skyscraper if you didn't have to? Sure, fires can spread quickly, but has NY been burnt to the ground by a few random fires in its sky scrappers? Nope, that city seems to be still standing. If we've figured out how to build single building skyscrapers that can isolate a fire and most of the surrounding floors barely notice, why don't you think we can design an entire city like that? You don't evacuate everything, only the isolated areas that are currently dangerous. This is like whining that NY is doomed if any single one of its skyscrapers burned because there would be the potential that the fire could spread to the rest of the city. Here is a clue. Dubai like NY has a fire department and will design such structures so most people don't have to leave their spots when the fire fighters pop by to put the random fire out.

      This is like complaining that just in case the structure is hit by a nuke there wouldn't be an easy way to get people out and house them afterward. Heck, any city of 1 million that was hit by a nuke wouldn't be able to move the people or house its refugees. I'd be more worried about industrial air pollution laws within the structure to keep the air quality higher than outside.

    9. Re:right up till... by WrongMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Great plan. Let's not build anything cool because it might get blown up by terrorists.

    10. Re:right up till... by vertinox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Someone crashes a A340F full of explosives into it. Or sets fires in it, or...

      Well make it out of something that doesn't burn or collapse in on itself if partially damaged by a large object.

      A building that size could be built with enough shock absorbing material to basically survive a ship tanker dropped from orbit.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    11. Re:right up till... by Teancum · · Score: 2, Informative

      The WTC was a disaster waiting to happen for a whole bunch of reasons. The evacuation plans that had been put into place when the building was built weren't even followed, nor was there any sort of realistic thought given in terms of practically evacuating that building complex.

      There were issues like fire exits sealed by sheetrock (with desks+cubicles put in their place), a design failure of the stairwells themselves, and an evacuation plan that hadn't been reviewed for well over 20 years by the tenants of that building.

      I disagree with your presumption here that sky scrapers aren't designed to be evacuated. They can be designed that way, and I've seen a number of buildings that indeed have such an evacuation plan set up and reviewed. Indeed, that very same NOVA episode that you are referencing here went into some examples of a good evacuation plan that could be implemented and safety equipment installed that could ensure a rapid evacuation of a building... including in a situation just as happened on 9/11 where you could evacuate people who were "trapped" above the fire zone and were unable to get out via the normal stairwell exits.

      One other sad fact about the WTC and 9/11: It was only at about 10% of its normal occupancy when the planes struck the building. Had the highly intelligent terrorists simply waited for a slightly later flight, the building would have been near capacity and had that 10x the number of people there to evacuate. That as many of them got out as it was is an amazing accomplishment.

    12. Re:right up till... by MechaStreisand · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you read the first link, it says that the explosive was a fertilizer/fuel oil bomb, ie, ANFO. Which is NOT a fuel/air bomb in any way. So the parent lies.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    13. Re:right up till... by hemp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You realize that out of the 50,000 people in both towers, only 2,823 died, with 105 classified as still missing?

      That is a 94.2% survival rate in 1 hour 48 minutes.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    14. Re:right up till... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of the sad rules of the Universe is that it is a lot easier to destroy than to create.

      And unlike most scientific experiments, this one can be proven with a simple adult vs. toddler scenario in a sandbox... ;)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    15. Re:right up till... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even if you can't exit all of the way up, a pyramid has a much higher ratio of ground-level surface area to volume than a tower. Every level you descend increases the area at that level, meaning you can devote more space to stair wells lower down, which makes bottlenecks less probably. In a tower, increasing the height makes no difference to the ground area (and, thus, the number of exits). Increasing the height of a pyramid increases the ground area, potentially increasing the number of exits.

      A pyramid is also less likely to collapse, since each layer is supported by a bigger layer, so you don't have such a rapidly increasing amount of force on each layer as you go down.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:right up till... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From the second wikipedia link in the parent post: " However, investigators discovered the bomb was made from potassium chlorate,aluminum powder and sulfur. For the Sari club bomb with the L300 van, the team assembled 12 plastic filing cabinets filled with explosives. The cabinets, each containing a potassium chlorate, aluminum powder, sulfur mixture with TNT kicker-charges, was connected by 150 meters of PETN-filled detonating cord. Ninety-four RDX electric detonators were fitted to the TNT. The total weight of the van bomb was 1.125 tons.[5] The large, high-temperature blast damage produced by this mixture was similar to a thermobaric explosive[6],although the bombers may not have known this.[7]"

      It appears that the first article is incorrect, and was only meant to emphasize that it was a terrorist organization that created this near-fuel air bomb.

    17. Re:right up till... by gregbot9000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about a Sperm whale and Bowl of petunias?

  3. Cool! by cashman73 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dubai considering building Arcologies! =)

    1. Re:Cool! by TinheadNed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Massive massive props to them. I could never get the population up high enough in Sim City 2000. What was it, about 90000 required before you could build them?

      Give them 10 years and they'll get bored and turn the disasters back on.

    2. Re:Cool! by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it was 120000 population.

    3. Re:Cool! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dubai considering building Arcologies! =)

      Paolo Soleri would be so proud, especially since it's being conceived as almost carbon-neutral. Soleri's latest project, Arcosanti, doesn't seem to be catching on (only 3% completed since 1970?!). Then again, most Americans aren't all that hip on living in a desert.

  4. vapor? by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The blurb is certainly buzzword compliant, but where are the specs and data? On the face of it, the project is utterly ludicrous, but sounds really cool.

    Who cares? Show us something real.

    1. Re:vapor? by Plugh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I predict the "ziggurat" will be carbon-neutral in the same way "Biosphere 2" is a "closed environment".

  5. Control of personal space by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People can live in very different conditions if their basic needs are met, if there is a cultural web to participate in, and if they have control over their personal space and possibility of advancement.

    I see challenges of propinquity here, but there are very crowded, thriving urban environments to use as examples.

    The key question to answer is: What is the reason for the people to live there, rather than somewhere else? That's the question that builds cities - or ghost towns.

    1. Re:Control of personal space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People can live in very different conditions if their basic needs are met...

      Sex. There, that's my basic need. Sooooo, 1.1 million people in close proximity = The worlds largest Toga party? Sweeeet.

      The key question to answer is: What is the reason for the people to live there...

      Refer to my previous answer for my real reason. Now, where are all the hot chicks?

    2. Re:Control of personal space by gregbot9000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I often think that people in the west hold too much of the world to their ideals. Sure people from the US suburbs might not like living in such close proximity.

      Dharavi, which is probably Asia's largest slum, has roughly 1 million people living on roughly 2 sq. kilometers already and is damn low in carbon footprint, with most things done by hand. The Fact that they can design a building to do the same isn't that impressive, What would be impressive is if they can do it without turning the lower floors into slave pens.

    3. Re:Control of personal space by Alsee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if they can do it without turning the lower floors into slave pens.

      That's not necessarily a deal-breaker.
      Just so long as I get to live upstairs, of course.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. Re:Ziggurat by mcpkaaos · · Score: 4, Funny
    Or one step closer to training Abominations.

    Summon more ziggurats!

    --
    It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  7. Obligatory, Warcraft by SlipperHat · · Score: 4, Funny

    "My life for Aiur! ... Uh I mean Ner'Zhul."

  8. Where does the food come from? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Carbon and energy neutral food I mean?

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Where does the food come from? by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Carbon and energy neutral food I mean?

      From carbon and energy neutral farms. geeze! Stop with this whole analyzing and coming up with glaring holes in the idea! Its' a dream and PR stunt! Let's keep it that way.

    2. Re:Where does the food come from? by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where does the food come from?

      You know those people that live on the bottom floor? They're soylentalicious! Now that's thinking green.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Where does the food come from? by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Its' a dream and PR stunt!

      You hit it right on the nose. Forget about where air, food, water, and energy come from or where wastes go, or about trapping a million people or more in a building for generations on end, or what happens in the event of a major fire or other disaster, etc, etc.

      Let's just shut our eyes and think happy, unquestioning thoughts!

  9. Beats mcmansions in Bakersfield by heroine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For all the billions Calif* spends propping up worthless mortgages, it could build gigantic ziggurats & actually house people.

    1. Re:Beats mcmansions in Bakersfield by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As with mass transit, that's a great idea that everyone would support someone else taking advantage of. Are you interested in living in a ziggurat in Bakersfield? (Although at least it's culturally and climatically preferable to Dubai.)

    2. Re:Beats mcmansions in Bakersfield by wumpus188 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well then obviously their Calif is not up to the task. Maybe they should try to get Emir too.

  10. Re:Ziggurat by everphilski · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once you turn to the dark side, forever will it dominate your destiny! and your dental plan ...

  11. Willingness by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are people willing to live in a mega building of 2.3 sq km?

    Sure, why not. It's not like there won't be parks, squares, expedition, lanes, views.. dense cities are essentially one mega building already.

    1. Re:Willingness by xstonedogx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have some conditions:

      I would only live there if the ziggurat itself was owned by the public and maintained with taxes. The public spaces, police department, fire department, and etc should all be cared for by the 'city'. I don't want to live in a huge gigantic apartment complex "cared for" by some corporation. Apartment complexes suck enough without the added problem of having to leave the _city_ in order to get away from a bad landlord.

      I would want to be able to own, buy, and sell "land" in the ziggurat the same way I can own, buy, and sell real land, condos, and etc.

    2. Re:Willingness by NtroP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have some conditions:

      I would only live there if the ziggurat itself was owned by the public and maintained with taxes. The public spaces, police department, fire department, and etc should all be cared for by the 'city'. I don't want to live in a huge gigantic apartment complex "cared for" by some corporation. Apartment complexes suck enough without the added problem of having to leave the _city_ in order to get away from a bad landlord.

      I would want to be able to own, buy, and sell "land" in the ziggurat the same way I can own, buy, and sell real land, condos, and etc.

      Because we all know how good the *government* is at efficiently and fairly managing and caring for it's resources.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  12. Re:Ziggurat by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take off every Ziggurat! Move Ziggurat for great justice!

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  13. Why wouldn't they want to live there? by GroeFaZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People live in large ships today which are much more of a machine and where there is decidedly less personal space, and, while on cruise, there is no chance for a change of scenery whatsoever.

    People live in large blocks of flats today, and would anyone really prefer ugly, grey, and box-shaped over clean, high-tech, and pyramid-shaped?

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
  14. Resistance is futile by randomErr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Resistance is futile. We are Dubai.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  15. Book Plug by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't remember much else about this book, but the idea of a giant city-building stands out.

    _Oath of Fealty_, by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle.

    http://www.amazon.com/Oath-Fealty-Larry-Niven/dp/0671532278

  16. Dibbs! Level 3-top Corner, North East facing by topham · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got not particular problem with spending a substantial amount of time indoors. I like to get out in nature now and then too, but within a city? Who cares?
    I do however like decent view.

    If the hallways are design appropriately, and there are some largish open spaces within also designed appropriately it's an easy sale.

    1. Re:Dibbs! Level 3-top Corner, North East facing by manekineko2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the article, the concept art shows a structure that is more of a perforated pyramid, so the surface area could be substantially longer than your napkin calculations suggest.

  17. Arcology by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Architect Paolo Solieri predicted this sort of thing decades ago. He designed several self contained cities he dubbed Arcologies.

    All predictions aside, I'd be surprised to see this ever happen. After all, the first one built in Arizonba never did fare that well.

    1. Re:Arcology by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I grew up in Arizona, and my dad took us to visit Arconsanti when I was in grade school. It was an interesting afternoon. It was pretty obvious then (late 70s) that it was not going anywhere. I'm really surprised it's still there. I always point at it when we go by on our way back to Phoenix from Strawberry. Should probably take my kids while I can.
       
      This kind of thing is always much, much easier to think up, draw, plan, etc. than to actually build and use.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Arcology by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Funny

      All predictions aside, I'd be surprised to see this ever happen. After all, the first one built in Arizonba never did fare that well.

      Yeah, because if the first one doesn't work, there's not a hope for anything else even remotely like it.

  18. Re:Ziggurat by agrippa_cash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On step closer to Caves of Steel

  19. Culture vs. Need vs. ...? by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Culture obviously plays into whether or not folks would be willing to live in something that is hyper-dense or not.

    OTOH, something that doesn't seem to be taken into account is, what happens when families change? A single guy only needs 'x' amount of space. Now when that single guy gets married*, has 4 kids, and a parent becomes decrepit/disabled and decide to move in...? Obviously there's going to be a lot of change in how much space the guy can be comfortable living in, no matter what culture we're talking about here.

    Also, what happens when some fatal communicable disease starts making the rounds? shutting folks into their 'homes' will only work for so long before even the most gregarious human being starts to get cabin fever (for lack of a better term).

    There's also the chance that the local economy could contract as well - you can only fit so much stuff into one space, and it's not like, say, Home Depot could do a whole lot besides sell wallpaper, paint, and light fixtures to the folks (just as example).

    Some folks here will happily cry against the "McMansion!" and think they're being the smartest guy in the room, but consider this: those things do get sold for a reason, especially as our society gets more and more 'crowded'... Suburbs, as much as they're derided, are actually a compromise between the comfort of wide-open spaces (and a buffer from 'the world'), and the conveniences of living in a city.

    From that point, it begins digging deeper into some fundamental human psychology - how does a human being deal with being more and more crowded in society?

    * yes, we could pack the city with programmers and handily solve the marriage problem, but we're talking people here...

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Culture vs. Need vs. ...? by kabocox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OTOH, something that doesn't seem to be taken into account is, what happens when families change? A single guy only needs 'x' amount of space. Now when that single guy gets married*, has 4 kids, and a parent becomes decrepit/disabled and decide to move in...? Obviously there's going to be a lot of change in how much space the guy can be comfortable living in, no matter what culture we're talking about here.

      Also, what happens when some fatal communicable disease starts making the rounds? shutting folks into their 'homes' will only work for so long before even the most gregarious human being starts to get cabin fever (for lack of a better term).

      Well, you could just have everyone be required to have their own rooms. That way husband/wife/kids would have to have separate living spaces. That would make sure if they got divorced they'd each have an apartment and that the kids would already be allocated space. I'm sure there would develop rules for the kids to move off into different sections of the city.

      As for plague/sickness, I think you are thinking about it the wrong way. A normal city can't shut out the outside world when a plague or flu season starts. This thing could have medical scans of everyone entering/exiting to make sure they don't bring in the flu or plague.

    2. Re:Culture vs. Need vs. ...? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So after you get sick of the Ziggurat building owners jacking up your rent astronomically every year when your lease renews (even though new tenants get far lower rates), you have to move to a totally different city?

      And if the building owners also run the police, the court system, etc., then what's your recourse when your landlord refuses to fix the broken plumbing?

      This doesn't sound like a very good idea at all.

    3. Re:Culture vs. Need vs. ...? by vertinox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OTOH, something that doesn't seem to be taken into account is, what happens when families change? A single guy only needs 'x' amount of space. Now when that single guy gets married*, has 4 kids, and a parent becomes decrepit/disabled and decide to move in...? Obviously there's going to be a lot of change in how much space the guy can be comfortable living in, no matter what culture we're talking about here.

      The same thing they do in NYC or Tokyo where real estate is a premium:

      Make do.

      There has been one compelling argument tho that suggests the end of McMansion and Surbia due to peak oil.

      The End of Suburbia (its the full 52 minutes allowed on youtube) documentary which gets into the issues with peak oil and its effects on society.

      Its worth a watch and even though I disagree on the alternative energy not being able to take up the slack, it points out how inefficient our current life style is with car transportation and how really the move towards a "New Urban" society is the best solution.

      Actually, being able to walk anywhere seems like an optimal solution even if peak oil isn't as bad as they make it out.

      Anyways... If they are right, the suburbs will be the new urban blight who no one wants to live in because no one can afford to travel anyways in your car.

      Had gas prices gone to $5 this year I'd say we're well on our way to peak oil, but even seeing we have a reprieve we might still want to consider our alternatives.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  20. Re:Easy target by repapetilto · · Score: 2, Informative

    actually arent pyramids the most stable possible structures. Its been awhile since static equilibrium so i dont remember the math or anything but I mean its wider at the base than the peak so its gotta be stable right?

  21. Integrated greenspace is a must by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    as are varied views within the structure. No one wants to live in a big, faceless glass box, nor look at big, faceless glass boxes. But if you have a large structure with integrated greenspace and human-scale details within the superstructure, to help fix the eye and give a sense of place, then it's not hard to imagine a million people living within it happily.

    Think Central Park--There are tens of thousands of people in it at any given time, but because it's made of little hills and dales and stands of trees you never see more than 20 people at one time and it doesn't feel crowded. If you did a similar thing in three dimensions it could work.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  22. One word by AshtangiMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    slides.

    1. Re:One word by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Napoleon, is that you?

      --
      The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
  23. The Machine Stops by McGregorMortis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will the thought of living in a machine comfort people?

    Not if they've read the short-story The Machine Stops by E.M. Forster.

  24. Re:Ziggurat by uberjack · · Score: 5, Funny

    dental plan ...

    Lisa needs braces

  25. Who Came First by AngrySup · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gibson, Niven, Pournell, the Matrix, they're all 'Jonny come lately's. The earliest mentions I recall are Asimov with "City" and "Caves of Steel" and Paolo Solieri with his archologies. Who was really first?

    1. Re:Who Came First by mr_mischief · · Score: 3, Informative

      The silent film "Metropolis" predates "Caves of Steel" by a few decades. It doesn't bother to explain how the city is self-reliant and carbon neutrality is never an issue. It is very much about having a rich upper class living above a poor lower class and taking advantage of their willingness to serve in the dark squalor of the depths of the city.

  26. Re:Ziggurat by kdemetter · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if these houses can also be upgraded to towers :-)

  27. Re:Ziggurat by davester666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello? Has nobody read Judge Dredd? These would be AWESOME for block wars!

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  28. Worst Cruiseline ever? by xactuary · · Score: 5, Funny
    "... and, while on cruise, there is no chance for a change of scenery whatsoever."

    My advice: Try taking a cruise on something other than a docked riverboat casino.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
    1. Re:Worst Cruiseline ever? by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Funny

      Join the Navy!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  29. Smoke and Mirrors by mrboyd · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Welcome to Dubai everyone where the greatest design meets the big money and the best projects a build out of nothing but desert sands.... OR NOT...

    I can answer his question about whether "food supply and waste system are taken care for" the answer is NO. Dubai sewerage system has been operating at twice its capacity for a couple of years and the new plant which is due in a couple of years is already not enough.

    For a quick overview of how glitzy this town really is you can check those:
    2 weeks sewerage flood
    http://www.gulfnews.com/Nation/Society/10225546.html

    This was only one "small" issue amongst too many to list. The government and whatever service in charge were overwhelmed and incapable to do anything to fix it. Or didn't care. Let's note that the residential complex has been built about 250 meters away from the sewerage treatment plant. Smell of shit can be enjoyed night and day there even where there is no flood. glitzy..

    Dubai is about glitz and money, big tower and man made island but all that is nothing but smoke and mirror, the reality is that the town has not much to live up to the reputation it is trying to build for itself by announcing mega-project over mega-project while finishing none of them.
    • Palm Island: Delayed. Some apartments were released and the outside walls started cracking due to foundation issues. Who would have thought building on wet sand would be tough. :)
    • World shaped Island: Delayed.. no one talks about it anymore around here. Full media blackout. Official statement is "Everything has been sold, we are on track". On track for what? when? no one knows. I doubt anyone ever bought any of those island. For half the price you'd get your own real island in SE Asia where the weather is nicer and the repression is much gentler.
    • Burj Dubai, biggest tower in the world. Well according the the view by my window... Delayed
    • Dubai Mall (biggest mall in the world, or so it says): Was supposed to open two weeks back in August but when I passes by it yesterday they were still busy pouring concrete.

    I could go on and on with my rant. I just want to add that we live behind a filtering proxy that bars any website that dares commenting against the UAE and it is very well possible that slashdot will go bye bye for a few days because of this comment. Just as it already did last year.

    Forget about mega-projects announced by Dubai Gov or related entities. It's nothing but an attention whoring press release from a city that would love to play in the big league.

    If you care to come around to verify that by yourself you're welcome but be careful what you pack though: http://thetruthaboutdubai.com/?p=4

    1. Re:Smoke and Mirrors by mrboyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, it happens everywhere. That was my point, Dubai has nothing special, some qualities, some flaws. Beaches, desert, night clubs, cinema, traffic jam. It's not too bad to live there provided you have a decent salary. We get 4 months of scorching hot weather and the rest of the year is delicious.

      My point was that Dubai is the only town of 3 millions inhabitants (75% expatriates on temporary visa) where they announce a new revolutionary mega-project every week even though Dubai's economy register as 17 times smaller than that of NYC.

      I just get tired of stupid newspaper reporting on every dreamy Dubai PR as something that "will happen" when the town can barely manage itself at the moment.

      Btw, did you know Dubai will have the world largest fountain in the whole entire world? http://www.sizzledcore.com/2008/07/01/worlds-largest-fountain-building-in-dubai/

  30. Re:Easy target by Tom · · Score: 5, Funny

    but I am pretty sure a pyramid can be easily unbalanced.

    Actually, I think they intend to build this one broad side downwards. :)

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  31. I predict disaster... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure, it'll be all fun and games ... until a Goa'uld ship lands on it. Then, not so much.

  32. Re:Ziggurat by joeman3429 · · Score: 5, Funny

    dental plan ...

    Lisa needs braces

    dental plan

  33. This is not an city; it's a prison. by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jeez, am I the only Slashdaughter that realizes that this is not meant to be a 'city in a building' or a theme park or an oasis, it's meant to be a prison.

        The Wackenhut of the world. Every country in the world can send their political prisoners, their purse-snatchers, uppity minorities, and urine-test-failers to Dubai. Where, for a small fee, they will be housed in the biggest, meanest, most-escape-proof, hope-for-humanity-crushing, prison that world has ever seen.

        And if the payments stop coming from the original country for the prisoner, they just get chucked outside. Naked. To die in the 120 degree F sun! No mess, no fuss, no packed airplanes dumping political prisoners into the South Atlantic Argentina-style!

        Hell, Dubai will even pick-up your prisoners in their old surplus Emirate Airlines Boeings! Tell 'em that they're going to Sweden on an Amnesty International 'Flight to Freedom'! Hell, no one will ever know! (Amnesty International workers are sure to be the first 'guests').

        Am I the only Slashdaughter with an evil mind? Or more mature, historically-accurate world view?

        And why is Dubai building all this architectural bling in the first place?

    1. Re:This is not an city; it's a prison. by BearRanger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ( SNIP) And why is Dubai building all this architectural bling in the first place?

      Because Dubai's rulers recognize that they are on the downward slope of their oil production curve. They're going to run out of oil completely in a decade or two and they're making an effort to transform themselves into a world financial capital. Now, while they've got the money. If they can siphon off a bit of business from London, New York, Tokyo and Hong Kong they'll be well placed to provide for themselves in the second half of this century.

      Planning for the future and taking a longer view is a lesson the West should take to heart...

    2. Re:This is not an city; it's a prison. by zobier · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only Slashdaughter

      There used to be annother one but it looks like the answer is yes, ma'am.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  34. Re:Live in a bathroom! by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Square kilometers = measure of geographic area.

    The "Ziggurat" is a city. Cities are measured by their geographic area, not the sum of all the floors in all their buildings.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  35. Re:Ziggurat by jaminJay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wake me when we get to Trantor.

    --
    Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
  36. The lesser of two evils... by Bragador · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The government is "us". It's a democracy. If a corporation owns a city, then we're talking about a dictatorship. It's harder to fight corruption amongst the leaders when you don't elect them...

  37. Re: Creation vs destruction by icebrain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or to put it another way:
    -You must play the game.
    -You can't win.
    -You can't break even, except on a very cold day.
    -It doesn't get that cold.

    Thermodynamics FTW

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  38. Uh, there ARE a few engineers here, right? by TomRC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Surprisingly - I don't see anyone calculating volume per person...

    2.3sqkm base means it's about 1.5km wide at the base. Looks like it'd be about 1km high from the picture. 1/3 base area * height = 0.767cu-km, or 767 million cu-m. Looks like the thing is about 3/4 open or shared space (streets, parks, corridors, elevators, theaters, stores, etc, etc), so about 190 million cu-m of living space.

    So each individual would have about 175cu-m. A family of 4 could have 700cu-m, or about 200sq-m of floor space with high ceilings - a pretty large apartment. So it isn't quite as cramped as people seem to think.

    Still, the mega-scale design is a monument to the ego of a poorly educated architect. Building collossally big is fine. Failure to build within that on a livable "human scale" is just arrogantly ignorant. It treats people as identical units to be slotted into storage compartments optimized to fit within the glorious "structure" designed by the architect.

  39. Re:right up till... science fiction takes over by proto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first post speculates a future with planes crashing into futuristic buildings, lets talk about a better future via science fiction. The article reminds me of the movie "Blade Runner". That's all I wanted to say.

  40. Re:Ziggurat by aliquis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine how fucking awesome it would be when they build a black citadel nearby :)

    1.100.000 people with an average life spann of 80 years = 37.6 deaths / day, at 8 corpses / meat wagon that makes for 5 meat wagons per day!

  41. Re:Ziggurat by chubs730 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd just like to point out that this post was made nearly an hour before the identical post that was modded 5,funny. The mods are really blowing it today. But I still love all you guys.