Linux Not Supported For Democratic Convention Video
bucketoftruth writes "If you browse to the Democratic Convention website and attempt to check out any of their upcoming streams, you bump into the following limitation: 'We're sorry, but the Democratic Convention video web site isn't compatible with your operating system and/or browser. Please try again on a computer with the following Compatible operating systems: Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista, or a Mac with Tiger (OS 10.4) or Leopard (OS 10.5). Compatible browsers: Internet Explorer (version 6 or later), Firefox (version 2), or, if you are on a Mac, Safari (version 3.1) also works.'"
I'm not going to the website anyway.
Most Linux users are going to write in Ralph Nader anyway right?
Vote McCain/Whoever 2008
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
Since invention of flash video we are free from unnecessary plugins and related burden.
Right, because Flash is free software, so it works with every current OS and browser.
Don't blame me. I voted for Hitler.
Since invention of flash video we are free from unnecessary plugins
Plugins like, oh, I don't know, maybe, FLASH?!
Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
We're sorry, but the Democratic Convention video web site isn't compatible with your operating system and/or browser.
Phew. That's a relief.
Anyone considering watching these things have their minds made up, and are just joining a circle-jerk.
Ever joined a jerk-circle, Anonymous Coward?
Thought not.
They're fun, and stopping people from taking part is not cool.
"Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
"Since invention of flash video we are free from unnecessary plugins"
*headexplodes*
Sam ty sig.
So what? You're gonna vote for the candidate whose website supports Linux? Pfft, how silly. I'll only choose my candidate based on their web server's OS.
In 2008 vote for the candidate whose server runs FreeBSD!!
You just got troll'd!
You must be new here.
They want me to pay for my operating system??
Oh well, I think I have windows installed in a PC in one of my seven houses....
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Really? If it were the "most technologically-savvy event" wouldn't it at least make an effort to support ALL operating systems
Damn right! If it doesn't work on either my Amiga 5000, NeXT cube, or BeBox, Obama's DEFINATELY losing my vote!
Lex orandi, lex credendi.
It specifically says that he believes in protecting children from porn and the RIAA's War on Sharing, but NOT 'prescriptive' legislation like Net Neutrality.
Well two out of three isn't bad. Children should be protected from all three: porn, the RIAA war on sharing and prescriptive legislation like net neutrality.
Except it's the no-sound version.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
obviously the best technical solution is that which requires minimal investment, is an open standard, and available to the largest number of platforms with the least additional per platform support cost.
the most technically savvy event would use moving ascii art, and it would be sweet
I agree completely! The options are mutually exclusive, when you think about it. The concept of a 'Download this video' button on a website with streaming video is utterly ridiculous -- nay, utterly impossible. That would require some kind if 'hyper' linking technology, a ludicrous fantasy in a world with browser-embedded video players such as ours. They don't care what the cost is, those damn those Linux nerds will ruin the Internet for all of us normal folk!
In other words, given his experience being tortured in Vietnam, he's very familiar with what it feels like trying to get Linux installed and running on your computer.
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Your message was not delivered because the destination computer refused
to accept it (the error message is reproduced below). This type of error
is usually due to a mis-configured account or mail delivery system on the
destination computer; however, it could be caused by your message since
some mail systems refuse messages with invalid header information, or if
they are too large.
Your message was rejected by mail.demconvention.com for the following reason:
5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering.
The following recipients did not receive this message:
Please reply to
if you feel this message to be in error.
Reporting-MTA: dns; xxxxx.xxxx..xxx
Arrival-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:07:40 +0200
Received-From-MTA: dns; [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
Final-Recipient: RFC822;
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: dns; mail.demconvention.com (67.132.2.16)
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 Message rejected as spam by Content Filtering.
From: xxxxx xxxxx
Date: 26 August 2008 11:07:39 GMT+02:00
To: info@demconvention.com
Cc: news-tips@nytimes.com, letters@washpost.com
Subject: How much did Microsoft pay you?
Hi,
at http://www.demconvention.com/dncc-video/ clicking on the link asks me to install Microsoft's Silverlight plug-in in order to view the videos streamed there. Given that around 90% of the world's computers already have Adobe's Flash plug-in installed which is the basis behind sites such as youtube, etc (and, yes it does do HD video and streaming), and about 0.1% of the world's computers have Microsoft's Silverlight technology installed and that Flash works on all browsers on Windows, Mac and Linux (and most mobile phones), one really has to ask oneself what incentive Microsoft gave you to get you to use their technology, and how one can square that incentive with the claim that the Democratic Party is a party with a platform aiming to avoid the stain of lobbying and corruption?
One also has to ask oneself how and why a supposed convention interested in reaching out to as many people as it can is using technological means that almost guarantee a smaller audience than using existing ones.
I've already written to a number of newspapers, including the NYT and the WashingtonPost, alerting them to this.
I would truly love to hear what you have to say about it.
Regards
xxxx
xxxx
xxx
Linux is a multi-headed hydra
I thought it was a pinguin. Maybe we can come to a compromise; can someone paste a few heads onto Tux ?
Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
the "Linux not supported" error message is delivered by a Linux server.
From netcraft:
Linux Apache/2.0.52 Red Hat
Tech Public Policy stuff