Slashdot Mirror


Unsolicited Offer For My Personal Domain Name?

Batzerto writes "Last Friday I received an unsolicited email offer for my domain — click the link below for the message. Their company name matches my domain, but with a country-specific top level domain (.NL in this case). They do seem to be legitimately using the domain in their country. As for my usage, the domain is my last name(.COM) and I'm only really using it for email. I'm not really that attached to it other than the hassle of changing email addresses. There are other flavors of the domain available (.US for example) that would suit my purposes just fine. So, Slashdot veterans, I ask you, what should I do? I'm leery of making an offer and falling into someone's legal trap. I wouldn't mind getting a chunk of cash out of the deal though."


From: ---
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 4:56 AM
To: ---
Subject: sell your domain ?

Dear Sir,

For my company I need the domain --- .
Is it possible to sell your domain to me?

Best Regards
N. de Robles

68 of 542 comments (clear)

  1. Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is capitalism.

    Google bomb your url with their company name by creating a Slashdot user account with their name and submit thousands of stories each week with your url in the homepage. You can also drop the company's name with an href to your url in CNN comments and on comments for popular blogs to get your pagerank up.

    Then inform them that your Search Engine Optimization Chief just caused your URL to be at the top of Google's result list.

    If they fail to triple their offer, begin redirecting to goatse. You should see them quadruple their offer then. It's called hardball.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe the quote that best describes your views on life is "This is why we can't have nice people."

      The offer does seem legitimate, though. Go for it, submitter!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Informative

      You should see them quadruple their offer then. It's called hardball.

      Or they bring out the lawyers and everybody loses. It wouldn't be the first time, either.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. The submitter has a legitimate cause to use this domain name. He's also free to sell it to anyone at whatever price he/she wishes.

      It's mikerowsoft.com all over again.

    4. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I would certainly mention that you own it because it is your name. That would give them the reason why you have it, and that you aren't trying to squat on it.

      Everyone's talking about lawyers and whatnot... what happened to just being polite? I guess lawyers have ruined that too.

      On that note, I wonder if it would hurt your case that you posted the question to Slashdot? It's not hard to figure out the site name as others have posted it already, which would turn up a search result... you get the picture.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by ArTourter · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is an exception to this which is valid in this case. The trademark in question (if it is a trademark, as the submission is not explicit here), is the last name of the person owning the domain. In this case, the last name should take precedence over the trademark unless it was registered "in bad faith".

      It appears that the Respondent registered the Domain Name in order to be identified by his surname, in line therefore with the provision of paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy.[...]The use of one's own surname in a domain name corresponds to a legitimate customary practice and is, as a rule, sufficient evidence of a legitimate right or interest in the domain name. The scope of the Policy is limited to cybersquatting. Trademark owners shall not be allowed to use the Policy to dispossess summarily a third party of a domain name reflecting his or her surname (G.A. Modefine S.A. v. A. R. Mani, WIPO Case No.D2001-0537).

    6. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by QuasiEvil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Everyone's talking about lawyers and whatnot... what happened to just being polite? I guess lawyers have ruined that too.

      Actually, I think you've hit on something there. If you go in with the intent of having a low-key, civil discussion, often times things you would say in the course of those discussions may damage your case if things escalate.

      In your case, I'd state that you own it because it is your name, and have used it for X number of years to provide services X, Y, and Z for yourself. That should help establish the legitimacy of your ownership, and may (IANAL) protect you against any trademark issues. Given that, you'd obviously be losing something of value and have a transition cost, and then invite them make a reasonable offer.

    7. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      Screw that. Zerba.nl is nothing but flash. Do the web a favor and never sell to them.

      --
      John
    8. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by rfc1394 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a trademark issue. If you ask for money for a domain name that includes their trademark, then they have a legal case against you for domain squatting.

      Not if they came to him first. And not if his name is the same as theirs. I can open a store called "Paul Robinson's Department Store" and the currently existing Robinson's Department Store (actually J.W. Robinson or Robinson-May depending on what part of the U.S. they're in) chain has no grounds to stop me (especially if I included the note "Not affiliated with the J.W. Robinson Co." on the entrance door of my store); one may always use one's birth name (or married name in the case of a woman, since men don't change their names when they get married) to do business even if it is identical to an existing company in the same line of business.

      Further, they would have to argue that they are well known in the United States and also that he has no legitimate use for the domain. As I just pointed out, one always has a legitimate use of one's own name.

      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    9. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you use it for email, you could possibly request that they forward mail to your username for a certain period of time, as part of the sale agreement.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    10. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 3, Informative

      And I would certainly mention that you own it because it is your name.

      That didn't work too well for Mike Rowe, of Mike Rowe Software. It was genuinely his name, but a certain agressive trademark defender made him give up his domain. (Ref:JFGI)

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    11. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When Shakespeare wrote "first kill all the lawyers"* his ire was somewhat misdirected.

      You know it was Jack Cade, the villian of the piece, that said this right? In a bit of exposition establishing him as a braggart and buffoon? Is attributing to authors quotes from their villians out of context really a good practice?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by elgatozorbas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, you can just write them a polite email informing that you use the domain and it is not up for sale. However if they really need the domain, and are willing to recompensate you for the hassle of moving to another domain, you would be willing to help them out.

      "It's not for sale, except if you offer me big $$$". What does that make you? Not respectable, I would say. Nothing against selling the name in itself, but don't play childish games (the only reason for which is fear of legal trouble, apparently).

      Only in the US could such a simple situation (one party wants to buy, the other wants to sell) be complicated by the fear of losing a lawsuit.
      (I know, say something bad about the US of A and be modded down, so be it.)

    13. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by Thinboy00 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You should see them quadruple their offer then. It's called hardball.

      Or they bring out the lawyers and everybody loses. It wouldn't be the first time, either.

      I think this link is more informative about the nissan.com issue.

      --
      $ make available
    14. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a good thing he didn't start an argument with the guys who make Uzis. Though getting shot might be a better way to go than being run over.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    15. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by Zordak · · Score: 3, Informative

      And not if his name is the same as theirs. I can open a store called "Paul Robinson's Department Store" and the currently existing Robinson's Department Store (actually J.W. Robinson or Robinson-May depending on what part of the U.S. they're in) chain has no grounds to stop me (especially if I included the note "Not affiliated with the J.W. Robinson Co." on the entrance door of my store); one may always use one's birth name (or married name in the case of a woman, since men don't change their names when they get married) to do business even if it is identical to an existing company in the same line of business

      This is not true. If you use a name that is confusingly similar to another's trademark, the fact that it is your own name does not make it okay. The whole point of trademark is to enable consumer's to identify the source of goods and services based on a known mark. If everybody with the last name of McDonald was able to open a burger joint called "McDonald's," that purpose would be frustrated. Consumers would be confused because they wouldn't know if this McDonald's was going to sell them a low-quality slapped-together microwaved piece of McCrap, or if this one happened to be some mom-and-pop knockoff instead.

      As for the domain name, if it's not that important, sell it. If they make a legitimate offer (like "We will buy your domain for $X") and you accept it, you have a contract. They can't then go to a court and say, "Look, he's trying to fleece us." (But that's not legal advice. Hire a lawyer)

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    16. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jeebus. Never hit 'Submit' until you know you have a handle on the situation! If you don't read all the necessary information properly and then mouth off at someone for being an asshat, you'll actually end up making yourself look silly. I almost did it earlier :)

      The part that's cracking me up is that he was modded "insightful."

    17. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know, say something bad about the US of A and be modded down, so be it

      Exactly what site do you think you're on? Blaming the US is like blaming religion; it's almost certain to get you modded up, even if it's a non-sequitur or blatantly false.

    18. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by Dare+nMc · · Score: 3, Informative

      In your case, I'd state that

      Without legal advice I would be very hesitant to give any non-public information. Even giving public information, that they obviously already know, *might* even be used to imply in a court, by omission, that you have no other claims to the domain. Simply fishing for more information, without making any claims, or anything that might be lost in translation as a threat Would seam safer. (IE re-stating what they already know, may sound more like a "lets fight", than "I also know what you know.")

      Simply, "I have received your letter. I would be interested in receiving any information you are willing to share relating to any plans you may have relating to "mylastname.com" "

      simply to get a feel for "are they legit" and "are they just fishing." before assuming anything more.

    19. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by fumblebruschi · · Score: 3, Informative

      It isn't out of context. In that speech Cade is listing all the great things that will happen, come the revolution: two chickens in every pot, free beer for everybody, we'll make Friday part of the weekend and give every new baby a chocolate eclair. And the very first thing, of all these great things we're going to do, is kill all the lawyers. It means exactly what it sounds like, and Cade said it because he was a populist and he knew it was what everybody wanted to hear.

    20. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by jc42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Another interesting case, if you can find the history from a decade ago, is the newton.com domain. It was owned by Mark Newton for years, and used by his small software shop, until Apple came out with the Newton and wanted the domain. Apple didn't negotiate; they just gave him the choices of giving up the domain or being bankrupted by the lawyers that Apple would sic on him. There were a few stories recently about Apple renewing the registration for newton.com, although they no longer actually use it for anything. It now just redirects to apple.com.

      So companies can be nice about it, or extremely nasty, or anything in between. I wonder if the US has any more legal protection from such things now than it did 10 or 15 years ago. Probably not; the big corporations can always bankrupt the little independents.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    21. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by HoboMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is out of context, because William Shakespere didn't say that himself. It came out of the mouth of one of his characters. A villain, nonetheless. You can't attribute to the author what a character says. Characters frequently say things their authors disagree with.

      --
      Remember kids, tin foil doesn't work, so use LeadHat.
    22. Re:Turn the Screws on Their Thumbs by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nissan is a common spelling/pronunciation of Nitsan, an Israeli name.

      The name Nissan is not the same name as Nitsan. Nitsan is a flower bud. Nissan is a month in the Hebrew calendar. Both are names.

      I wrote to Uzi Nissan about a year ago when I bought my Ford Focus. I let him know that I didn't even look at the new Nissan models because of what the company is doing to him. Nissan is losing sales over their treatment of the little guy. Uzi Nissan was in the car business when Nissan was still called Datsun. It should be Uzi suing Nissan Motors over the use of the name, not the other way around.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  2. Trap by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can they accuse you of domainsquatting if you ask for money or something like that?

    Seems like I've heard similar horror stories of people losing their domains because they asked someone to make an offer.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:Trap by smilindog2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since this is his actual name, it's technically not domain squatting. Here's what I'd do. Just ask for a few thousand dollars. It's not enough to piss off the buyer, or to convince him to send lawyers to take the domain by force.

      I know someone here in Chapel Hill, NC who realized how slow the South was picking up on the web. He bought several domain names, of local businesses, and asked for $2,000 any time they asked for the domain. The amount was too low to bother with lawyers, so they just paid it. It's slimy, and I wouldn't do such a thing, but in this case, the guy's just being asked for his personal domain.

      Here's my favorite domain related suit. This guy's name is Nissan, and so is his business.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
  3. On the condition... by DavidpFitz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sell it, on the condition that you can keep your email address on the domain.

    Win-win!

    1. Re:On the condition... by HFShadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You would trust your personal email to a random company who bought your domain off you?

      The world you live in must be nice.

    2. Re:On the condition... by Loether · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yeah and i was thinking from the POV of the business. They are going to support this guy who they bought the domain from. the guy doesn't work for us, we don't know him at all and he's going to be able to send out valid emails from my companies domain.

      No thanks. Pass.

      --
      TODO create witty sig.
  4. Finally a use for the 'itsatrap' tag by Idaho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As you probably noticed yourself, it's likely a legal trap; if you show that you're interested in taking money for the domain name, they will then use that as an argument during legal proceedings that you're a domain name squatter.

    So simply don't respond.

    --
    Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    1. Re:Finally a use for the 'itsatrap' tag by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is /., people would rather get wrapped up in a 1/1,000,000 chance of something being a big trap than suggest this guy try and profit.

      I've sold three domains I was legitimately using and made a pretty nice wad of cash. They all initiated with similar emails. The highest one being $19k USD.

      Let fear reign and opportunity escape.

    2. Re:Finally a use for the 'itsatrap' tag by cecom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I saw this in several comments already. Think, people, think ! :-) How the f*ck can be considered a domain name squatter if the domain carries his own name ??

    3. Re:Finally a use for the 'itsatrap' tag by tinkerghost · · Score: 3, Informative

      In this case, the submitter indicated that the domain name is his last-name. That sounds like a pretty solid defense in any court against the squatting argument. In terms of any squatting or trademark dispute, his claim (last name) is equally valid to the company's claim (company name).

      Depends on the name & the country. McD's doesn't push trademark restrictions too hard in the UK because Lord McDonald of McDonald told them to lay off or else. In some places, a person's name wins every time. In the US it depends on timing & scope. However, in most instances, trademark violations have to show the potential for confusion - with few exceptions, a personal website cannot be easily confused with a corporate homepage.

      In terms of squatting, it would depend, since he's using & has been using the domain for email - the presence or absence of a website is irrelevant to squatting. Showing active use of the domain for some purpose other than ad-parking is usually sufficient to kill a squatting complaint.

    4. Re:Finally a use for the 'itsatrap' tag by sjf · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is the internet. If you're not browsing with your credibility threshold set to "999,999/1,000,000 offers are scams," then I've got some little blue pills I'd like to sell you - I'm the manager of an implausibly sounding bank in Nigeria, and if you'd just pay some advance fees, I can increase your bust size while you make money at home !

  5. www.zerba.com by Stubtify · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this is the website in question.

    Don't know if I crossed a line, but it took all of 1 second on the google.

  6. dear slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A lonely girl has sent me an email seeking a relationship. I am a man and this sounds good. Should I seek to get into a relationship with this unknown but self admitted pretty girl?

    1. Re:dear slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      See if you can trust her first. Send her all your bank account info, and see what happens.

    2. Re:dear slashdot by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't matter. If he gets married, it's the same thing only slower.

      --
      John
  7. Why? by jesterzog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they fail to triple their offer, begin redirecting to goatse. You should see them quadruple their offer then. It's called hardball.

    If you wanted to be really evil and as much of a bastard as a typical domain squatter for some reason, then sure. But why? By doing what you've suggested, you also end up polluting Slashdot, CNN and Google with crap, which is no better than your average link spammer.

    There are many domains which people own that they're not particularly attached to and would be happy to sell. For someone looking in from outside, it's reasonable to think that this might be one of them, particularly if it's not immediately clear that the person's using it. (Lack of a website would imply this to some people.)

    All they've done so far is politely ask if they can buy it. The request was short on words but that looks more like translation issues rather than an angry demand to hand over from a corporation full of lawyers. It could just as easily be someone's small family business which thought it'd be useful to have .com on the end of their name. How else are they supposed to find out if the owner's interested in selling if not by asking?

    1. Re:Why? by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And the voice of reason speaks up.

      It doesn't appear to be that hard to be reasonable, does it? I really must try it sometime.

      But seriously, I would negotiate a price and probably ask nicely if I can keep an email address on that domain for a while. It's no real hassle for the other side's servers, unless you're getting multi-gigabytes of spam a day. Then at least you've got a good period of time to phase out that address.

      Or keep the MX records for your domain and sub-let the www section out to them for $200/year. That way everything essentially just stays the same for you, and they get a .com webpage.

      Plenty of options if everyone's talking nicely at the table.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  8. Sales 101 by Kagato · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tell them you'll entertain offers. If they throw out a number, it can only go up. If you throw out a number, it can only go down.

  9. Offer to Post Link by Deton8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As others have noted, offering to sell your domain to them can be used as evidence of bad faith if there is other evidence you are cybersquatting. However, you can write them a letter and say you aren't really interested in selling the domain, what with the heavy email use you've been making with it for years, but if they request it you will put a link on the front page which says "Looking for Zerba the fashion designer? Click: www.zerba.nl" You could also offer to forward email to specific accounts to them if applicable -- in my case I have the dot-com for a name which some bloodsucking lawyer has the dot-net for, and people are forever sending me his mail. I have set up auto-forwards for all the accounts that seem popular at his office (so that I'm not accused of looking at private legal mail).

  10. And why did *you* own chrysler-dodge-jeep.com? by billstewart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you were a car dealer or specialized repair shop, then it may have been reasonable for you to own a domain using several of their trademarks. That's certainly too broad a set of categories to be a likely hobbyist organization. Sounds like you were cybersquatting.

    That's a different case from acquiring generic names (which can be rather dubious as well), and a much different case from what the main article was about, which is somebody who owns a domain that's based on his own name.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:And why did *you* own chrysler-dodge-jeep.com? by ribit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have only suggested a couple of examples of fair use... there's plenty more. Mine was editorial-related. I produce an online automotive industry magazine and started to buy related domain names in case I wanted to expand into brand-specific publications. Sometimes acquiring relevant domain names can be the spark to finding a new market niche or convincing a potential business partner that a new publication idea will fly. Not all of them pan out, so I was prepared to sell in this case.

  11. DNS is your friend by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keep it, but offer to lease DNS records to them. Basically, rent "www IN A ....." while keeping control of the domain itself.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  12. No, not likely by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Legal proceedings are expensive, lengthy, and not guaranteed. Thus a company would rather pay a reasonable sum to just get what they want, rather than have a fight. If you make them a reasonable offer, maybe a grand or two for your trouble, they'll likely accept.

    The company my father used to work for went through this. They wanted a domain that a guy had. So they contacted him and offered him $10,000. They figured, as it was just a personal site, that he'd jump at it. It was an easy way to get what they wanted, and not a lot of money in the scheme of a company's operations. However, the guy decided that he wanted millions. Well, then they took him to court and won. However it probably cost them over $10,000 in legal fees.

    So, if you respond with something like "Yes I'd be willing to sell my domain. However, there is going to be some inconvenience in dealing with a transition. So if you'd agree to $2000 to cover my expenses, I'd be happy to sell." I'd bet they go for it. That's not expensive to a company, and it makes everything real easy.

    1. Re:No, not likely by tsalmark · · Score: 4, Informative

      In all correspondence I'd use the term transfer in place of sell.

    2. Re:No, not likely by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So, it is as the consensus of the comments suggest. If you sell it for inconvenience money, then they will probably pay the money and go away. If you choose not to sell it for a price they wish to pay, then they may take you to court. If you were foolish enough to fall into their trap and offer to sell, then they will use this to take away your property even if you don't wish to sell it.

      What people don't seem to understand is that really, in the scheme of things, if I own something it is mine. The legal system should protect that. If I don't want to sell it, then I don't, in most cases, have to. One way of saying I don't want to sell it is to offer it for an insane amount of money.

      Taking used to be used primarily for government sponsored project. Now it is used because some random company thinks that just because they can make money with a property, they should own it. This is why this question came up, and why the guy should try to protect himself. It is your domain name, fair in square. Even if you are squatting, there is a element of possession being nine tenth of the law. As the parent indicate, there are people who will do anything to take things that they want, unless the owner is willing to accept a token amount to 'voluntarily surrender the property'. This is not good. Sure, maybe trademarks need to be protected, but if my name is Coke, is there some fundamental reason why the beverage company has a higher claim on it than I do? If I had the foresight to register the domain, should I not be allowed to profit off that foresight? Is there something in the free market that one is allowed to make money unless it pisses off the multinationals?

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:No, not likely by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure, maybe trademarks need to be protected, but if my name is Coke, is there some fundamental reason why the beverage company has a higher claim on it than I do?

      Yes: supreme power. In the end, that's the only thing that truly matters. Everything else is just philosophy, which is fine as long as everyone plays along nicely; but when it goes down to a fight, might wins over right.

      Is there something in the free market that one is allowed to make money unless it pisses off the multinationals?

      "Free market" is also free in the sense that the 500-pound gorillas are free to squeeze you underfoot. That's why I lean towards socialism myself; a single gorilla - the government - is easier to handle and if necessary distract than the small number of King Kong corporations of libertarianism or the endless hordes of rampaging killer apes of anarchism.

      Yes, I'm very cynical.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  13. I had a good sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently sold my domain to a french company that reached me in a similar way. I told them i had no interest in selling the domain as I use it for personal and business reasons. I told them if they wanted to buy my company, then to make a reasonable offer (but again I had no interest in selling the domain at this time).

    They provided a very attractive offer and I did end up selling the domain. They simply redirect the .com to their french site. I got 6 months of email forwarding.

    My experience was good, but that does not seem to be what people here are saying...

  14. Keep the domain name by zchang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You may be using it for email now, but who's to say whether you or any of your relations will develop some sort of product in the future that can be marketed via your .com address. It is, after all, your own name so you have sufficient right to hold the address without anyone accusing you of cyber squatting.

    Similarly, there's a chance that the company will grow much larger in the future and their buy out offer will increase. Consider it an investment.

    Simply add a redirect link at the top of the page. "Perhaps you were looking for company X? They can be found at [their URL]."

  15. The lawyers are not completely to blame. by richardkelleher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lawyers do not get involved unless they are invited, but, there is always a lawyer who will take any stupid case that some idiot brings to their door.

    1. Re:The lawyers are not completely to blame. by antijava · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought that was vampires.

    2. Re:The lawyers are not completely to blame. by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      Same thing.

      --
      John
    3. Re:The lawyers are not completely to blame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only real difference is the stakes involved...

  16. No need to be....... by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ......a dick.

    Seriously. We all complain about the bullshit that surrounds us on a daily basis here at /. yet we see posts like the 1st one up. I am hoping he was being funny/sarcastic (as he was properly modded).

    Try being the good guy, write them an HONEST email explaining your concerns, and ask them for a reasonable offer. You will always retain the right to reject (unless you foolishly give it away). So, what have you got to lose by being honest about things up front? IF, and I emphasize, IF, it ends up in a courtroom, you will have already scored some points in that you will be able to prove a good-faith effort to remedy the situation.

    While I can agree with the "talk to a lawyer" suggestions, to some extent, I do feel that lawyers are sometimes wholly unnecessary and are merely a moneypit. Send the email, get a response, and then decide whether or not a lawyer is called for. And don't forget your gut. It talks to you. Listen.

  17. Maybe the sender is lonely and wants a response? by MarkvW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The letter is very unbusinesslike. Its grammar is poor. It doesn't have the 'look and feel' of something legitimate. Most interestingly, the email conveys absolutely nothing to identify the potential purchaser.

    If somebody doesn't have the time or ability to compose a good email, I would suspect that they wouldn't have the money to fund a substantial domain name purchase either.

    If somebody isn't going to tell you (verifiably) who they are, why would you want to do business with them?

    This smells bad.

  18. Re:Maybe the sender is lonely and wants a response by poptaart · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually the style of the email and the grammatical errors are very Dinglish. (Dutch + English). Especially the closing and the way he signed his full (first initial last name). Most dutch people rarely include their full first name in correspondence, usually using only their first few initials. This is proper business etiquette. On the flip side, in the news, the first name last initial is commonly used to "anonymously" name suspected criminals who want to stay anon, for example Ali G.

    Seeing as he comes from .nl - at least that part is legit.

  19. Try to help them out by lakeland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think about it from their perspective. They're probably worried they're missing out on a small number of customers who inadvertantly go to your site instead of theirs.

    I would guess their lost revenue is low to very low, so don't get greedy. There are plenty of reasonable alternatives that could be worked out to make you both happy. Examples:

    A priminent link on your website to theirs would be my favourite - sell it to them as 'advertising space' or donate it if they seem nice and you can't be bothered collecting a few dollars.

    Offer to sell them a HTTP redirect service and keep the domain yourself.

    Sell them the www subdomain but keep the MX pointing to you.

    Sell them the domain and ask for an email alias.

    Think of it as a normal business transaction between two individuals. Bargain in good faith and you're not opening yourself up to much legally. Try to charge something outrageous and you're likely to fall foul of the squatter rules.

  20. This happened to me by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This happened to me back in 1999. Actually, it happened to me a lot, but 1999 was when I finally won the domain name lottery.

    I told him the same thing I tell everyone who asks: "Well, I'm not really looking to sell my domain name but feel free to make me an offer."

    He said, "I'll give you $5000."

    I said, "That's a reasonable offer, but I have both the .com and the .org and I'd want to sell them as a pair."

    He said, "Okay, I'll give you $5000 each."

    I said, "That's a very fair offer. I need to think about what it would take me to change my address and migrate everything off the name."

    A week later he called and asked for my decision. I said, "You made me a very fair offer. I'm still thinking it through. Give me a little more time."

    A few days later he called and asked for my decision. I said, "You made me a very fair offer. I'm still thinking it through. Give me a little more time."

    He said, "Look, I need to move forward, have graphics made for my business and so on. If you'll decide now, I'll double my offer."

    I said, "Give me one hour. I'll call you back in an hour."

    An hour later I said, "$20k? Done."

    Down payment on my house, right before the real estate market headed for the sky.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  21. Alternate hypothesis by rewt66 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe the sender is:
    - a person who does not have English as their first language, and/or
    - a techie?

    That would account for the rough grammar and the informality.

    I mean, seriously, if an IT guy from .NL wrote it, would you really expect it to read like an American lawyer wrote it?

  22. I've done it; exact opposite, though by rfc1394 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Several years ago I registered a domain name for something I was trying which I was thinking about. Some guy, whose last name was the same as the domain I registered asked me if I'd be interested in selling it. Well, I needed the money so I quoted a reasonable offer. After the check cleared I did a change of the owner from me to him.

    I took his personal check because he was in the U.S., the rules are very different when it's an international transaction. (I once paid for a shareware registration to a guy in Canada using a personal check drawn on a U.S. bank, I presume Canadian banks have no problem handling those; but I wouldn't accept anything but a guaranteed payment for an international transaction.)

    Since the possibility of fraud is high when the buyer is outside the same country (on low value transactions where there's no money to chase them if you can't recover it), you make sure it's a guaranteed payment. I would suggest either wire transfer (and make sure the payment additionally includes your bank's incoming wire transfer fee) or Western Union for the same reason scammers use them: so the money is guaranteed and can't be revoked or a fraudulent transfer such as a forged check. Especially since the funds transfer is from a foreign country, it might cost you $30 or more to clear a check issued on a bank in some other country, presuming you don't get the check back in six or eight weeks as a forgery. If they want a written bill of sale or something, fine. But you get guaranteed payment before they get the domain.

    Another option if the amount of the sale is not over the limit: set up a new, fresh account using Paypal or Google Checkout that goes to a new checking account at a bank (other than the one you do business with now) that will allow you to open one with no monthly fee (and check the paperwork they give you, sometimes they sneak fees in there), then, once the transfer clears, take all the money out except a token amount ($1) in cash, and then deposit the cash in your other account. Or close the account as you no longer need it.

    This way, they can't undo the transaction and you've got the cash. Even if they try to reverse the transaction, the bank can't reverse it because you didn't use paper; if you took a bank check from them they could reverse the payment to your bank. Also you don't want to use the same bank as your own because they can use set off if the other side tries to renege on the transaction.

    In fact, if they are going to use wire transfer, use a new account because I suspect the information needed for an incoming wire is the same as could be used for an outgoing one, and they might be able to siphon money out of your account. Or check with your bank to find out how to have a wire transfer that doesn't allow them to extract money from you, but I think wire transfers are ridiculous because of the fact that your bank charges you for the incoming transfer as well.

    Automatic red flag: if they offer you more and want you to arrange something to send them money back. 99.9999999999999999999999999999999% of the time it's a scam for them to rip someone else off and leave you on the hook to make the person they stole from whole, since they can't be found, but you can.

    I just went and looked it up for an example transaction, a Western Union transfer of $1,000 from Netherlands to the U.S. is about 711 Euros and costs around 41 Euros for the transaction, probably less than it would cost them for both ends of a wire transfer. If you're charging less than $1000 for the domain, the transfer fee to them will probably be less.

    If you do these things and the transaction goes through, it hasn't cost you anything but a little time and you've protected yourself.

    Otherwise it's no different from selling anything you own to someone else. A domain name has a registered owner, you transfer the registration to someone else, they own it. Most personal property doesn't have registered owners, if you sell something they just t

    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  23. *NEVER* throw out a number by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the domain were just his name, none of this would matter. But the fact that the company's name matches the domain makes it a potential trademark dispute, so you must be mindful of ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. It explicitly lists several types of "bad faith" registrations, and the first one is acquiring a domain primarily for the purposes of selling it. If you throw out a number, that can be interpreted as evidence of intent to sell, and thus bad faith and grounds for losing your domain.

    Instead, get them to make an offer first. Something like, "I hadn't really thought about selling it, but my bills have been getting kind of high recently. How much were you thinking?" Although the most bulletproof is, "Sorry, not interested" and hope they make an offer.

    Go to Moniker's domain auction site for some ballpark figures of how much domains similar to yours are selling for.

  24. Obligatory by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  25. Review Chaco.com decision by drgreening · · Score: 3, Informative

    You should solidify your ownership of the domain immediately, and consider specifics about offers, etc. later.

    I had an interesting challenge to my ownership of the Chaco.com domain. We were using it legitimately to host material on Chaco Canyon, as well as hosting our MUD client (formerly owned by our company Chaco Communications). And yet, we were challenged by Chaco Sandals. The challenge was close; we almost lost the domain, just because we were a little sloppy.

    The details are here:

    http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/791739.htm

    Based on my experience, I would suggest that you get all the domain ownership issues in a solid form: Use your own name, make sure the addresses are correct and usable, don't use a "privacy filter" like GoDaddy sells to hide your identity.

    Good luck.

  26. Been there... got the legal papers to prove it. by stonewolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I also own the .com version of my name. In my case my last name is the name of a company that does about $100 million a year and has had a trademark on my name and a few versions of it for over a 100 years.

    I can tell you for a fact that companies that are serious about getting your domain name do not send you a polite email asking to buy it. They have their agent or lawyer send a registered letter and follow up with a phone call.

    Most likely the guy who contacted you won't pay you enough to make it worth the hassle of changing your email address. But, speaking as someone who has turned down offers ranging from a couple of shirts (no, I am not making that up, they were very nice wool shirts...) to $20,000 for my domain name and as someone who has been threatened with being sued over my ownership and use of the domain name 6 times over the last 12 years here are a few things to think about.

    1) It is your name. (The web cred for being first-name @ last-name . com is incredible.)

    2) It will only become more valuable with time.

    3) Don't fall into the nice guy trap. You are not doing this guy a favor, he doesn't give a shit about you. This is no different than if someone walked up and offered to buy your truck. (That has happened to me too.) You have something he wants, but you want it too. You do not have to share.

    4) Research the company. What does D&B say about them? How much can they afford to spend? How much is the domain really worth to them?

    5) Never never never tell them what you will sell it for. No matter what price you mention they will make a lower counter offer and will never (well... almost never) pay what you ask. More importantly, they will pay *no more* than what they *think* it is worth to them. If you quote a price that price will be the maximum they will pay. If they quote the first price that price will be the minimum they will pay.

    6) If the sale is contingent on your getting a .us domain then make sure you have that domain before you finish the deal. My dear friends went out and grabbed all the names I might want as an alternate domain just so they could use them as bargaining chips.

    7) If they make an offer get a lawyer. Do not reply to an offer until you have a lawyer. BTW, a *good* intellectual property lawyer is not cheap The first one I tried to talk to wanted a $30,000 retainer. So, I had to go with a not very good lawyer... BTW, you should note that the cost of a *good* lawyer started out $10,000 higher than anyone ever offered for the name.

    My best advice is to send back a polite email asking what he is offering. When the reply turns out to be less than $100 you can laugh, tell the guy to blow you, and at least know you had the fun of getting a personal question posted on /.

    Oh yeah... in the end I still own the name and I am in the hole a few thousand for legal bills. I am pretty happy about that. They could have sued (even though they would have lost) and bankrupted me with the legal fees of winning the suit.

    Stonewolf

  27. I've sold domains from unsolicited offers as well. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've sold three domains I was legitimately using and made a pretty nice wad of cash.

    I registered a domain name about 6 years ago with the intent of starting a company that offered a service pertinent to the domain. It was a mashup of two words that I created myself. About 3 months after registering it I got an email from someone in Israel asking me if I would consider selling it. My response was along the lines of, "No, I hadn't considered selling it but so that I can compare with what I had planned to do with it, could you let me know your offer?" He came back and said $1,000. That is not a lot of money, but I had a pipeline of about 20 other web projects in front of the one I was considering for this domain so I took it.

    We did an escrow.com jobby and everything worked flawlessly.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  28. Escrow.com by hedronist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    +1 on escrow.com

    I sold a domain 2 years ago using escrow.com and everything went smooth as silk. To this day I do not know who the buyer was, but his agent handled a few details, and the money was wire transfered - ba da bing.

    This was a domain I registered back in 1992 and I got an ridiculous amount for it. But if I knew then what I know now ... Sigh. I could have had sex.com, auto.com, business.com, etc.com. Sigh. Back to working on the perpetual motion machine.

  29. This is what's wrong with corporations by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At a certain point, when you realize the guy isn't squatting, you cut him a check for $250K and you're done with it.

    Nissan has spent more than that on lawyer's fees and are further from their goal. If I was on the board of directors, I'd ask to have the guy pushing this fired. Not because of the money, but because of poor judgment. If you can't use common sense in obvious things, you probably can't suddenly turn it on for complex issues.

    Really, fire the guy at Nissan Motors who keeps pushing this lawsuit, and then pay the guy a few bucks for the domain.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you