Slashdot Mirror
Sarah Palin's Stance On Technology Issues
Revolution Radio writes "BetaNews has a short description of what we might expect from Governor Palin regarding technology issues. She demonstrated her familiarity with the internet by initiating an online education program for state workers, using the web for government transparency, and a supporting the general concept of 'long-distance distribution of services' (similar to net neutrality?)."
We've previously discussed Senator Joe Biden's tech voting record and compared the technology platforms of Obama and McCain. In addition to the above story about Palin, Betanews also has analyses of Obama, McCain, and Biden regarding tech policy.
Isn't the fact that if it was up to her our schools would be teaching creationism enough for a Slashdot reader? You can call me a troll/off topic, but I think if we have a FAIL in basic science, technology issues are unimportant.
Did you read the article you referenced?
"Palin has not pushed creation science as governor"
"As a candidate for governor, Sarah Palin called for teaching creationism alongside evolution in public schools. But after Alaska voters elected her, Palin, now Republican John McCain's presidential running mate, kept her campaign pledge to not push the idea in the schools."
"When asked during a televised debate in 2006 about evolution and creationism, Palin said, according to the Anchorage Daily News: "Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.""
"In a subsequent interview with the Daily News, Palin said discussion of alternative views on the origins of life should be allowed in Alaska classrooms. "I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum," she said."
"Palin said during her 2006 gubernatorial campaign that if she were elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum, or look for creationism advocates when she appointed board members."
"Palin's children attend public schools and Palin has made no push to have creationism taught in them."
"Neither have Palin's socially conservative personal views on issues like abortion and gay marriage been translated into policies during her 20 months as Alaska's chief executive. It reflects a hands-off attitude toward mixing government and religion by most Alaskans."
Sounds like she understands basic science and theory just fine. Also she seems to have a grasp on that "separation of church and state" thing.
um, Palin's current stance is that doesn't believe that creationism should be taught in school in addition to evolution, but that it should not be a prohibited topic. If you're going to diss a candidate, at least don't act like a raving fool and use actual arguments and assessments.
How so? They quoted both the former Mayor and the Time magazine, who interviewed other people.
Sorry to disappoint:
Stein says that as mayor, Palin continued to inject religious beliefs into her policy at times. "She asked the library how she could go about banning books," he says, because some voters thought they had inappropriate language in them. "The librarian was aghast." That woman, Mary Ellen Baker, couldn't be reached for comment, but news reports from the time show that Palin had threatened to fire Baker for not giving "full support" to the mayor.
Source http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1837918,00.html
Her scandalous record on the environment alone should perpetually disqualify her from government.
you had me at #!
"She would like to see it taught, but won't push the issue" would be a more accurate description.
If what this guy said is true, they/she are not against the use of Linux at the state level.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
How is this a knee jerk reaction? Creationism as you say, is not worth being called a science. You don't teach evolution and creationism side-by-side. Agree with other comments here: teach about it, fine, in a *world religions* class. Not present it as an alternative to the evolution model, which it is not.
Evolution is archeology. Natural selection is biology.
One's history, one's science.
Right, she was unsuccessful. However, it has been confirmed that she did indeed attempt to have the books removed. The librarian refused.
http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/story/515512.html
I did PCR and created transgene bacteria (glowed under UV) in my High School biology class... in 9th grade. In a public school. And evolution was integral.
What were you saying?
I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
I had to think of that quip when you mentioned "Powerful people starting wars because they think their supreme being would like that".
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080903/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_iraq_war
Unfortunately I'm not aware of any sources that don't cite the AP release, but no particular rebuttal either.
Yum.
Thing is, though, she's not even for less government spending. She took plenty of handouts from Ted Stevens until his fortune started to sour, at which point she jumped on the bandwagon in labeling him a pork peddler. She was for the bridge to nowhere, until that became politically sensitive. And from what I've read of her time as mayor, she took a town that had a budget surplus when she came into office and squandered it, taking out loans to cover unnecessary civic works projects and leaving the city with massive debt. Hardly in line with even the most basic libertarian viewpoint.
Just to add to your excellent comment, when there is legitimate scientific disagreement, teachers generally do introduce students to the conflicting points of view. Consider the various interpretations of quantum mechanics. (I'm an Everett many-worlds man myself.)
According to the Anchorage Daily News (Largest paper in Alaska) Palin asked the town's librarian during a town council meeting about banning books and was flatly refused.
According to the article:
Four days before this exchange took place the librarian had received a letter from Palin asking for her resignation. Similar letters were also sent to the Police Chief, Public Works Director, Finance Director, and Museum Director.
Again according to the article (emphasis mine):
The article is not clear what effect the other letter had. The librarian did, due to public popularity, survive a call for her resignation but later resigned for a better job in Fairbanks. The Meusum director was let go when Palin cut his job from the city rolls.
According to the article there is no documentary evidence that any books were ever banned from the library although the article does not quote the present librarian.
It is known that Palin subsequently cut funding for an expansion of the library and the museum while pushing for the construction of a local hockey arena that, according to other articles remains in litigation as it was built on land that the town did not own clear title to.
From this I don't see it as fair to call her someone who is obsessed with banning books but it is apparent that she places an emphasis on "loyalty" and has priorities that focus more on hockey than education.
As to the less porn more drugs line or the "country folks" I'm not sure either one is deserved. Meth problems aside Palin's stance on the bars was a backers issue. And once in office she didn't spend, apparently, much effort campaigning against porn so much as for hockey. As culture warriors go she clearly stumps on it but only acts on it in general terms.
"there appears to be no truth to the claim made by the commenter, and no further documentation or support for this has turned up."
It looks to me like Jessamyn's saying there is no evidence to back up the commenter's list, the one people are complaining contains books published after Baker left.
There doesn't appear, however, to be any evidence that Time's original claims regarding Palin's confrontations and threats against Baker are false.
Tweet, tweet.
Economist:
...Alaska's economy is built on two things... The first is federal spending, especially the little-scrutinised grants known as earmarks. Between 1996 and 2006 per-capita federal spending in Alaska rose from 38% above the national average to 71% above. Scott Goldsmith, an economist, reckons a third of all jobs in the state depend on it.
...the other pillar of Alaska's economy: windfall taxes. Last year (Palin) championed a tax hike on oil companies which is helping bring in huge sumsâ"more than $10 billion in the fiscal year that ended in June... Suddenly flush, the state has promised $1,200 to every man, woman and child...
So Alaska's growth streak, now in its 21st year, is unlikely to break soon. But the good times obscure a big weakness. The state government has become dependent on revenues from oil, which are likely to decline as the major fields dry up.
Palin is a social conservative, raised taxes numerous times, expanded the size of government in both her role as mayor and governor, and made questionable use of eminent domain to seize private property in a manner that had previously been unprecedented in Alaska.
Basically, her position is the exact opposite of the libertarian one on most issues you care to look at.
10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10
What influence would any V.P. have over national education? None, I think.
Yeah, well you're missing the point of what a V.P. is. Let me review that for you: The V.P. is one that becomes the P. if something happens to the P.
Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
---
Note the bolded part. The prime intention of the first amendment is to prevent an established state religion. To establish a religion, you just have to teach its precents at the exclusion of other religion. To teach only "creationism" in science class, which is exclusively the judeo-Christian god's creation story, just as "intelligent design" really is only the judeo-Christian story of design, you have in fact established an official religion in terms of which one is taught as fact in public education.
Also teaching evolution doesn't fix that - nor does placing it in science class make it science.
Ryan Fenton
So, all those cities you mentioned are isolated from their suburbs and exurbs by 2500 miles of foreign soil? San Francisco is smaller than San Jose, but the mayor of San Francisco (at least before Willie Brown and Gavin the Model-Boy) is considered to be a far more difficult position.
We've had 9 Presidents leave office (4 assassinations, 4 natural deaths, 1 abdicated) out of 43 people. That's over a 20% chance just to begin with.
Actuarial tables give McCain a 1 in 3 chance of dying in the next 8 years, though I don't believe that adjusted for things like the treatment he received as a POW or all the plane crashes he survived, both in training and the time he was shot down.
McCain's thousands pages of medical records didn't get much scrutiny, either. They gave a few friendly journalists a few hours to go over them. I don't know about you, but 100 pages/hour is a pretty good clip for me reading a story, let alone medical records. There's no way they could have read them all, so we just don't know.
It was ironic that Karl Rove attacked Obama over the mere idea that he might choose an inexperienced VP for "political" reasons. There's a great table about Rove contradicting himself here, as well as a link to the video.
I have heard this myth spread by uncountable numbers of people, but just because something is said a lot doesn't make it true. It might make more people THINK it is true, but it doesn't make it true.
In order to prove a statement, you need to present a solid proof starting with first principles, followed by provable deductions and ending with a logically following conclusion. Disproving something, however, is quite simple: one merely needs to find a counterexample. In your case, disproving your statement is child's play.
I have a sister studying at the second highest ranked vet school in this nation. There, she is pursuing a dual vetiranary degree and Ph.D. She does not believe in evolution, but believes in creationism. Yet she has had no trouble dealing with a VAST amount of different biological lifeforms, and understands them deeply enough to even treat their conditions, as most vets do. She has already contributed to research in both animal and human diseases as part of her Ph.D. reasearch. Before attending vet school, she recieved triple undergraduate degrees in biology, biochemistry and political science (for balance :D). Not all of the teachers she has had believe in evolution either. Yet it has not stopped them from making contributions to their field, nor has it stopped them from teaching biology in a meaningful way to others, as you claimed it would. If someone is capable of advancing knowledge of both human and animal diseases, I believe that others would agree that she must have been taught something meaningful, wouldn't you?
The statement that evolution must be believed in order to understand biology is patently false. Molecules must be understood to understand chemistry, but that is because they actually DO play an integral role in the day to day science, and are testable. Origins of biology do not play a day to day role in the field, and it's a good thing too, because even if evolution is true, it's quite clear that no one has really has much of a clue about it yet. Consider for a moment how often the books get rewritten on evolution... today they say man descended from this prior species of hominid, the next day they say we came from a different species, and then a few weeks later it's neither one, and the new claim is all three species are actually descendents of some other new in-between species. So think for a moment... if evolution truly had the bearing on biology that molecules have on chemistry, would we not be having to rewrite all biology, biochem, medical, and vetirinary textbooks just about every month? Instead, all these stories about a new evolutionary theory are usually greeted with a mild curiosity and then largely forgotten, as people go back to the work they've been doing for years, which hasn't changed one iota because of the new discovery in the "fundamental science" of evolution.
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
"Palin's current stance is that doesn't believe that creationism should be taught in school in addition to evolution,"
Except you are lying.
"In a 2006 gubernatorial debate, the soon-to-be governor of Alaska said of evolution and creation education, "Teach both."
http://www.thelangreport.com/religion-or-lack-of/sarah-palin-wants-creationism-taught-in-school/
If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
They sure can do alot with tubes in Alaska
Hey... she knows how to use EBay***
*** Sarah Palin remarked on her ability to reduce graft by putting a state-owned luxury jet worth $2.7 million dollars on EBay.
Technically, she told the truth -- her exact quote in her speech was "That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay."
The whole truth is that the jet never sold on EBay. Sure she "put it on EBay", but if failed to actually ** SELL **. The jet only received one bid and that fell through -- apparently the buyer wasn't "vetted" thoroughly.
Instead, the plane was sold for $2.1M to Republican entrepeneur Valdez in a no-bid transaction that basically had no oversight at a $600K loss from the original purchase price.
The same plane sells on the open market through airplane brokers for about $2.4M. Still the $2.1M sale price was $300K below the price she should have expected on the open market if she went through a broker than doing it herself on EBay -- which contrary to Republican opinion, EBay is not the best marketplace to sell a luxury commercial quality jet.
But selling off a gov't resource to a rich friend of a fellow republican at $300K below market value in a no-bid transaction doesn't sound nearly as down to earth as, "she sold a luxury jet on E-Bay because she likes to drive to work".
Wanna know how McCain is telling this story now : "You know what i enjoyed the most? She took the luxury jet that was acquired by her predecessor and sold* it on eBay â" made a profit*," McCain said, introducing Palin. (*Technically not true statements)
. . . Nope, it didn't *SELL* on EBay and it certainly didn't make a profit . . .
Then here's what matters:
District of Columbia:
population: 581,530
Fed Money: $58,600,000,000.00
per-capita: $100,768.66
State of Alaska:
population: 670,053
Fed Money: $8,500,000,000.00
per-capita: $12,685.56
Washington DC gets about 8 times the money per-capita than Alaska does.
3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
We can, and did, observe the process of evolution. Note that "God" has nothing whatsoever to do with this physical, replicable in the lab, observable process with mountains of evidence to support it. Just as it is with the shape of the Earth. Creationism on the other hand has exactly zero scientific evidence to support it, very much like the existence of "god".
This statement indicates that it is you who does not grasp even the most fundamental principles of science and wish to confuse your audience with your fained "outrage" as to our supposed scientific "heresy".
Here's the list and a brief explanation of how succession works.
Gerald Ford, President of the United States from 1974 to 1977, never won a national election. He was appointed to be Vice President when Spiro Agnew resigned, and then became President himself when Richard Nixon resigned. He lost the next election to Jimmy Carter.
In the TV show The West Wing, which I highly recommend watching in its entirety (starting with the pilot), there's an incident that prompts President Bartlett to temporarily turn over the Presidency to the next in line. Normally this would be the Vice President, but the VP had just resigned, so it fell to the Speaker of the House. The awkward thing was 1) the President is a Democrat while the Speaker of the House is a Republican, and 2) the Speaker of the House must resign from Congress before he can be sworn in as President (only the Vice President can serve in two branches of government at the same time), and when President Bartlett decides he's ready to resume his duties as President, the former Speaker of the House cannot simply return to the House; he's out of a job until the next election (House elections are every 2 years). Interesting stuff.
$x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
$x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
Sorry, I should quote my sources. The $300K below market came from the Chicago Tribune. I'm sure you will continue to say that number is just "spin" though because all the press is "liberal media" trying to smear Palin rather than an actual attempt to get news out about an unknown candidate who's suddenly a possible VP for our nation.
Instead, the 23-year-old 10-seat Westwind II was sold in August 2007 for $2.1 million to a Valdez, Alaska, entrepreneur; that's about $300,000 less than a broker's asking price, according to news accounts. -- Chicago Tribune
Sarah Palin did not need the jet because she could drive to work. However, there are areas of Alaska where there are only two forms of transportation: airplanes and boat. Any Alaskan can tell you that air transportation would be a necessity for a governor who lived in one of those areas since boat is too slow for state business. However, there is no reason such a governor could not use public air flights instead of a private jet.
BTW, there is one small mistake in my post, the entrepeneur is not named Valdez but from Valdez. His name is Larry Reynolds and he is a good friend of Republican speaker of the Alaska House, John L. Harris, who brokered the no-bid deal. Reynolds made campaign contributions to both Palin and Harris in 2006 and 2007.
Sorry, I should quote my sources. The $300K below market came from the Chicago Tribune.
It's not $300K below market, but $300K below the offer price. Given the aviation slump, this is not unusual. How about some sources from the time, free of the election spin and the Chicago-spin:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/25/us/25jet.html?pagewanted=all
http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=6422443
Republican speaker of the Alaska House, John L. Harris, who brokered the no-bid deal.
Not true. The plane was sold through a private aircraft broker named Heckmann, who is anything but a state lackey, having had prior legal encounters with state contracts.
The final price did indeed end up saving money, given the costs of insurance, storage, maintenance. The bid fell through because the buyer backed out.
As a lifelong liberal, even I am disgusted at this smear campaign. It's okay for Obama to be selective about stories from the past, but not for Palin? Let's not lose sight of the fact that she pledged to get rid of the plane and did so, responsibly and through a private broker who signed off on the deal.
Really? Washington, for example, used to go to church because it was expected, but he always walked out before communion. When the priest suggested that he might be setting a bad example, he agreed - and stopped going altogether. Lincoln wrote some incredibly antitheistic things over the course of his life, with his early writing expressing doubt over the benefits of religion and his later ones expressly condemning it.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
They make so much in oil that each citizen is paid $3,200 annually.
The fact that they're getting any federal money when their state is positively rolling in oil money is substantially more outrageous than if you examine the per-capita federal money sent to that state.
My brother is an Alaskan citizen, people who are complete hermits can still get this money without contributing anything at all to either their state or federal government. This is more than most Alaskan citizens pay annually in federal taxes.
Sorry, it doesn't make sense to examine per-capita money when the Alaskan government makes so much more in alternate channels.
A lot of people maintain a mailing address in Alaska and maintain their Alaskan citizenship, then just have the check forwarded by a buddy to the lower 48 states. They shouldn't be receiving any federal money as long as there's this sort of absurd excess.
In fact, this amount of excess speaks significantly to the unsuitability of Palin for VP role. She hasn't had to balance a budget even for a small town. She hasn't had to deal with limited funds at all in fact. Their government doesn't even know how to spend all the money it does have.
Slay a dragon... over lunch!
That's a pretty big haul of pork for a district which doesn't even have a single voting representative to gather the pork. What do they mug congressmen on the way into congress?
That's not pork, it's a chart of Federal Government Spending. You might be surprise to find out that Washington, DC is chuck full of Federal Government buildings. Those buildings need services, including roads, security, and your figure likely even includes the salaries of the Congressional and Executive staff. Truth is that Alaska is practically a welfare state, and pulls out of the federal government nearly twice as much as it puts in.
The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
While this topic is about technology, this is nonetheless an interesting article, concerning her attitude to the environment, corruption and more;
Go here.
I don't come from the US, but the thought that she could quite easily become President, well, the thought is a scary one.
Trying to associate Microsoft with "fun" is like trying to associate Satan with aromatherapy. -Tycho
Here's a guy who, with his Harvard law degree, and the ability to make hundreds of thousands of dollars, instead put aside his own greed and got his hands dirty on the streets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_and_career_of_Barack_Obama
If you notice, the Harvard Law degree came after the Community Organizer phase of his life.
It's good to keep your facts straight, just so people don't use those errors to pull apart your argument.
That said, after reading your post, are there any presidents in recent memory that lived up to their campaign rhetoric?
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!
Still the $2.1M sale price was $300K below the price she should have expected on the open market if she went through a broker
You are wrong, at least on this detail.
According to the article cited by the other poster, "that's about $300,000 less than a broker's asking price ".
If she went through a broker, the broker would ask for $2.4M, possibly collect that amount, then pass along the rest--less expenses and a hefty commission. Going through a broker also would have required additional red tape to the process because of the extra middle man.
- RG>
Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
The mayor of a town of 6000 is responsible for whether it's the meth capital of her state. Especially when she becomes governor of that state, with so much more power, but the problem gets only worse.
The senator from a big state like Illinois has zero control over whether a giant city in it like Chicago has a lot of drugs (that it's had for centuries). A state senator has a little more control, but even that's not much.
You zombie Republicans are so incompetent at knowing anything about government that you'll grunt how Obama has less "executive experience" than Palin has, when hers is all bad, and of course therefore also more than McCain has, either. But then you'll grunt how Obama is more to blame for executive incompetence that has nothing to do with him, as some demented argument that Palin's executive experience means nothing.
Congratulations! You're a zombie army.
--
make install -not war
What insight. Why didn't I realize that? Palin is more qualified than Obama! Let's just run down the timeline here:
When Obama was graduating from Columbia University (Ivy League) with a degree in Political Science with a focus in International Relations, Palin was graduating high school and competing in beauty contests.
When Obama was President of Harvard Law Review, then organizing Chicago's largest voter drive in history and teaching Constitutional Law, Palin was switching between six low-key colleges before finally getting a degree in journalism (polisci minor)
When Obama was in the state senate drafting over 800 bills (so many that he created a backlog; there's still some working their way through today), Palin was being elected of a tiny town of 5,000 (at the time) with 53 employees that she didn't even control (a city administrator did that) with just over 600 votes. Pushed for policies that drove the town into $22 million dollars of debt -- and that *with* the massive sales tax increase (spending increased ~34% during her tenure) and over $20 million in federal earmarks. $1.5 million of the debt due to bungling an attempt at eminent domain to build a sports complex.
Obama was elected to the senate from one of the US's largest states with 3.5 million votes, where he has served for twice as long as Palin has been governor (elected with 114,000 votes, to run a state with about as many people as Fort Worth, Texas). Obama served on 13 committees, including the prestigious Foreign Relations Committee, and has met world leaders in dozens of countries across Africa, Europe, and the Middle East. Palin got her first passport in 2007, and her campaign claims the following foreign policy experience: Canada, Kuwait, Germany, Ireland, and Russia. Canada because she's crossed the border before. Kuwait because she flew there to visit the Alaska National Guard (never left the base). Germany because she stopped at a base there on the way back (never left the base). Ireland because her plane stopped there to refuel (never left the airport). Russia because "Alaska is close to Russia".
Hmm... since Obama's senate term (involving sponsoring over 500 bills and drafting over 100, including the most sweeping piece of ethics reform since Watergate) is twice as long, that's probably not a fair comparison. I guess we should merely compare his *presidential campaign*, which is about as long as her governorship. 1.5 million donors versus ~680,000 taxpayers. ~80,000 campaign volunteers versus ~50,000 state employees.
You're right -- Palin is clearly more experienced!
Do you work at Taco Bell? The guy at the drive-through said that to me last night.
Oh, darn, I wasn't fair to Sarah there. She didn't do nothing from the time that she majored in Journalism to when she ran for mayor. She served as a sportscaster, part time fisherman, and city council member. Also, later, she was appointed to the oil board, where she stayed briefly before making a name for herself by outing the commissioner for using state eq for Republican Party business (this right after her failed Lt. Governor run in which she ran her campaign out of her mayoral office, using taxpayer dollars for mailings) My apologies for demeaning her career by not mentioning these things.
.
Do you work at Taco Bell? The guy at the drive-through said that to me last night.
Maybe I read it wrong, but your post implies Obama has a cult of personality. If I didn't misread that, you're confusing charisma and perspicacity with what a true cult of personality is - where the government forces the media to unquestioningly and unhesitatingly extol virtues of a political leader - real and fake - in order to prevent citizens from ever hearing anything bad about their whitewashed leader.
Cult of personality notably has a negative connotation, and indeed it should, it's a form of repression. If you want to see what a true cult of personality is like, examine Eric Lafforgue's Flickr photo set from North Korea, where citizens are required by law to wear patriotic pins, and required by law to have photographs of their illustrious leaders in their home, tilted slightly downward so the eyes follow you everywhere. Where citizens are required by law to have a radio in their home which they cannot turn off that periodically spouts political propaganda. Where every hour, on the hour, from 6 am to midnight, loudspeakers blast out a patriotic song. Where reading material for children is war propaganda espouting the virtues of their leader and speaking in vague terms of the threat of the west.
Obama doesn't have a cult of personality. He has the clarity, insight, and speaking ability to make people feel good about the chance for change in the future, to feel good about themselves and who they are and can be. He inspires people. And even though you try to make that out to be a bad thing, it is in fact a very good thing.
Perhaps you haven't looked. Here, Obama covers current foreign policy issues in detail, giving a good background on each, and detailing his plan for each: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/foreignpolicy/
Slay a dragon... over lunch!
First, Obama and Hillary had 21 debates, including four one-on-one debates. I believe it set a record for debates during the primaries.
Second, McCain and Obama just recently finished making the schedule for debates, on August 21st. Three debates and a VP debate is pretty much standard.
Third, McCain invited Obama to town halls to debate questions from normal folks, and Obama never showed up. But wait... turns out that the "town hall" was actually invite-only, and filled with only Republican supporters. (link) I wouldn't exactly trust any town hall that was set up by McCain's camp.
She won't, well why not? Or have you had your head under a rock?
She has had several interviews before she announced her candidacy. After she was reveled as the VP pick and the convention, she has went on a tour with McCain and it has only been 10 days since the announcements. Actually less then that considering they wanted to wait until the convention to introduce her to the rest of the world. ABC is going to interview her later this week, and I'm sure others will follow.
Don't excuse your own ignorance for something she hasn't done yet. There is only so much time in a week and there will be plenty of time for interviews that are already scheduled.